Peter Hurley Reviews the Canon 5DS

[@Kazzzo]

Peter Hurley reviews how great Peter Hurley is.

[@mozzmanau]

Typical iDumb LOL

[@kellhound1]

Literally what I was thinking 2 minutes into this useless video

[@425gabe]

A true professional! He knows the gear and what its meant for, he's not hung up on specifications like many reviewers.

[@JeremySmithPhotography]

I wonder why go with the 5Ds and not the 5dsr...the medium format digital backs he's used to using don't have AA filters...

[@ThoriumHeavyIndustries]

+Jeremy Smith also they are CCD not CMOS :D

[@JeremySmithPhotography]

Not all of them...many new medium format cams use Sony's new CMOS sensor. And regardless if it is CCD or CMOS the same effects of an AA filter still applies :D

[@ThoriumHeavyIndustries]

But none of the cameras have moire-filter :D

[@MichaelMa]

Softer shadows, smoother skin.

[@100sryoung]

I have been shooting wildlife and events video with my Canon 5Ds for over a month now, I also plunged in my Tascam mixer with a shotgun microphone into the Canon 5Ds mic jack and the audio / video was fantastic. Was it better than A/V I have shot with my 1DX or 5DM2, no, it was just fantastic. I also tested my Canon 5Ds against my Hasselblad H3 and well, I didn't expect Canon 5Ds to beat Hasselblad and I probably never will.

[@keithteaser]

I like the camera but I prefer less light on the subject or at least natural light as the eyes on the models is showing the light reflection ? this loses a lot of the eye colour.? Although I do like my Nikon d90 which is still a high selling camera and takes very good photos I am looking forward to trying a second hand canon eos 5ds which is coming my way!

[@genomunari4111]

Great video and I want to buy a camera for my needs. I am an Appraiser and photograph historical documents, old movie posters, copy photos (negatives) and some I want to reproduce. Is this the camera for me? Can you tether it since it doesn’t appear to have a movable LCD screen which may be needed to copy 5x7 negs? I really appreciate your opinion. Geno Munari

[@nicholasjude7937]

What is the name of the equipment at 0:21 thats says 'SELECT' and what is the name of the eye lash and gel he uses to remove the shine on the face ? Adam Sherwin

[@freddieslaughter1107]

What kind of tripod head are you using? What is the difference between the s & sr?

[@BenjieDavies]

Which canon camera, would you recommend; is lower, or around the same price, but can shoot better video??? Need something that cuts even in both performances!

[@anoophcl]

Go for used 5dmark4

[@KaoukabiJaouad]

how about the quality of the lenses that we have to put in front of a 50.6 MP Sensor .... there is very few that have an effective resolution ... that can make a full use of the resolution power of the sensor the only name that come to my mind is the OTUS Zeiss the 85mm and 50mm ones .... a camera that can only be effectively be used just with few lenses .... ....yeah well i have a weird feeling concerning this camera. ..... its useful on a very narrow niche ....

[@Aps3FanBoy]

Still looks like a dslr though res wise ye it's close to medium format but the sensor size is no were near so the qualities are completely different

[@domzbu]

Bet that model will enjoy watching himself back at the 2.50 mark

[@traianima]

hold the chicken That's how people would see him in the real world everyday

[@domzbu]

Traian Constantin lol yeah but you wouldn't pay $1000 for a spotty nose headshot session

[@domzbu]

***** amazing wit.

[@lepadus7926]

I lol on that one.

[@muaathe78]

Do you agree with me about depth of field is unusual with this camera? . even at F4 the nose still blur !!

[@nolaPIC]

hard to tell, since it depends how close he was to his subject, and what the lens was that he shot it with, f4 ain't not a lot of dof by any means.

[@formattester6]

Muaathe Aziz this camera is FF. shouldn't be any different than any other FF body.

[@BigAntTVMedia]

i told people canon wasted $$$ making this 50 MP belong on a 1dx not 5d body the $$$ and production line used for the 2 cameras is man/machine hours needed too make and release a 5D mark 4 people will be wanting/needing asap

[@nolaPIC]

plenty landcape and studio photographers will buy plenty these bodies... I'll wait for the 5D Mark IV. The 1dx is the high iso king and fast Fps, so they made the right choice.

[@RayValdezPhotography]

Muaathe Aziz He uses a 100mm macro lens. he loves the macro even in medium format So f4 is going to be a bit different.

[@baltimore52394]

what software is he using on the desktop? I haven't upgraded from LR 4 so excuse my ignorance.. Is that Lightroom or something else?

[@Mcdowells]

Capture One

[@christopherbessis491]

nice review thanks, because i was between 5dsr or 5ds.... and am scare about the moire....u helped me.....

[@dougslocum9668]

At 8:07, Peter holds up a a "de-shine" lotion. What is it?

[@AdamSherwinNYC]

Hey Doug, The product is called "Peter Thomas Roth anti shine mattifying gel." Thanks for watching!

[@firemusic82]

Wow I was a royal Dink 5 years ago. I apologize for any insults that I wrote. I still don't own multiple digital bodies, but I totally understand why you'd want an extra body in case of a malfunction. Again, I apologize for my crappy attitude.

[@sermonshaba]

Hi! Which lens do you use here ?

[@kienddao]

High ISO performance probably is my most concerned aspect of the coming 5DS. And I am getting very mixed signals here. Firstly, in this video, Peter says that the camera delivers very nice results at ISO 1600, and it does actually look nice in the video at 100% view. Even at ISO 3200 there's just "a little bit of noticeable noise in the black background. But that's about it; the file looks good..." (:4:15) It only falls apart at ISO 6400. So isn't he actually commending its low light performance? Though he did mention that if you're a low light/high speed shooter, this probably isn't the camera for you. But come on, who shoots serious, professional work at ISO 6400 and above? Secondly, as far as I know, the 5DS and the 7D MII have the same pixel density, using the same technology. So, in theory, 5DS's high ISO performance should be a leap forward from the 5D Mark III and 6D (as how 7D MII is compared to 7D and 70D). DXOMark has the ISO performance scores for these cameras. I own the 7D Mark II and see consistent results. ... But I have also read many reviews that mention an official information from Canon that the 5DS has better low light performance than the 5D Mark II (but not III). (Plus the fact the Canon limits the ISO to 12800). What am I supposed to make of that? Really confusing!

[@elonex777]

Kien Dao Don't forget that each time you don't need 50mpx you can reduce the file to 35 or 25 and the noise will be even less noticeable, so i think 5Ds file reduce to match 5D III and 6D size will be much better. The 12800 limit is a way to split customers and they think 5Ds owners are more exigeant than 5D III/7D II. Magic lantern will remove this software limit.

[@vexphoto]

Great video, than you! One quick note though, the music in the background is a bit distracting, annoying actually...

[@11557bexley]

Can you shoot HSS with a moonlight with 5Ds

[@azhax6127m]

*Canon C300 Mark II cinema vs Canon EOS-1D C* ???

[@ChrisAdval]

what does he use to "de-shine" ?

[@Gadgetsjon]

"I'm a medium format shooter."

[@Crashoverall]

great review. dont get all the hate people throw at him.

[@joseph-the-seventh]

Peter is too alpha for the sensitive millennials out there trying to get into photography. His micro-aggressions are off the charts!

[@CodeTravelwithRizwan]

To Counter attack Sony A7RII Canon is going to release Canon 5D mark IV with 10-axis image stablization, 8K with 120p, 4K with 1000p, 60 mp BSI sensor (Multilayer) with ISO 5,40,000. Tilting touch screen, Autofocus of 70D, 15fps, buffer unlimited. and big thing Dynamic Range is Excelent beats Nikon 810, Sony A7II. Price $3500/=

[@marckydasaint8730]

I am a Canon 5D and 5D mark III owner. I rented the 5DS for a wedding last week and here are my thoughts on the camera. The 5DS is super sharp... Too sharp! The 5DS seems to also try and sharpen BOKEH in shots. I tried lowering the resolution to Small Raw, and I also tried the crop feature, neither had any affect on this issue. The bokeh looks, "God Awful," with this camera! On the positive side, if you are shooting at small aperture like f16 and are going for sharpness, the photos look amazing and very close to Medium Format in terms of detail. I used the 5ds with an EF 50mm f1.2 L and what normally is a Bokeh Monster Lens, made the background very busy and a bit nauseating. I will say that I was prepared for a poor lowlight performance, but it actually performed very well under these conditions. I found 3200 to be very useable.

[@marckydasaint8730]

Marcky Da Saint Before you purchase the 5Ds or 5Dsr, I would recommend that you go over to Flickr and examine photos taken at wide open apertures and see if the bokeh you see is attractive.

[@max801]

I found a brand new 5ds for a good price (850 £). I will mainly use it for weddings. Do you reccomend to buy it or not? The alternative would be a 5d mk4 but at a higher price (1600 £). Thanks

[@EnidAgnusDei]

Last year I bought a 5DS R, hated it, hardly used it then learnt how to master it. Don't care re video nor mega high iso, let me just say this, I love my 5DS R that much, I bought a 5DS as my main second camera. To me, the best camera ever.

[@marcelo_afonso]

How different are they? I have a A7IV and a R6 but I own a lot of EF glass and I'm really into product photo so I've been willing to choose between a 5DS and a 5DSR but I don't know if the extra 300$ of the R really make that difference or the 5DS will be more than enough to blow me away

[@EnidAgnusDei]

@@marcelo_afonso I'd hire them both to see which suits you the best, I have shot both side by side and viwed the images side by side and whilst the DS R is a tiny bit sharper, honestly I really struggle to tell them apart, I am sure with either, they will blow your mind. Good luck!

[@jmvc1977]

What is the camera lens? thks

[@AdamSherwinNYC]

Hi Manuel, The lens Peter is using during the shoot is the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM. Thanks for watching!

[@jmvc1977]

Thanks for the response :)

[@wanneske1969]

What lens did you use ?

[@richarddavis6716]

conon 135mm

[@HEREONOUTBAILEY]

Wrong. It’s the 100mm macro 2.8 IS II.

[@RayValdezPhotography]

I am glad that he was pretty honest. He wasn't like OMG this is the best camera ever everyone switch to it. Like some of the guys that get checks from Canon.

[@RayValdezPhotography]

Every word I wrote was spelled properly. I did write was instead of wasn't. Stop being a "spell check bitch." Especially when nothing was spelled wrong.

[@e5211]

RayValdezPhotography cheques not checks

[@RayValdezPhotography]

Hurley and I are from the US. We spell it check. Cheque is more of international English spelling. In case you are serious

[@colgiljnr]

The low high tone in this video is weird

[@prasad_0046]

Can you please tell me which is that software you are using to see all the images while shooting?

[@rohansanjay3241]

Capture One.

[@igokmen]

thnks

[@D4ni3lS4nk3]

name of the song please?, its really cool

[@maryw8720]

+Peter Hurley, how well all this would hold if +Canon was not sponsoring you? If +Nikon gave you the same deal would you be singing a different tune? How about your move from +Phase One? You happily downgraded?

[@albertocabrera6614]

Did Peter Hurley actually went on the record that 50MPs equals more details in a image? Really, Peter. The man is wrong. All that 50MPs get you is a bigger file. Now it will provide a big enough file to print a 6'X8' booth graphic and not lose sharpness or detail. But if all you do is web, magazine and standard prints...16 and 24MPs is more then enough. Especially if all you do is web. I guess money will get you to say anything, even if its the wrong information.

[@michaels3003]

The smallness of your mind is astonishing.

[@albertocabrera6614]

@@michaels3003 why thank you what kind thing to share.

[@michaels3003]

@@albertocabrera6614 , it was based on your comments. If somebody else wrote these comments using your name, then I'm sorry.

[@albertocabrera6614]

@@michaels3003 your kind words have really enriched my life here. I mean, I only bestowed a bit of wisdom here. But instead of being such a kind person, why not tell me what I said that was wrong.

[@albertocabrera6614]

@@michaels3003 rewatched the video. Still stand by what I said. You don't need a 50 megapixel camera for instagram and web photos. A bit of overkill if you asked me.

[@twotrees510]

Yep. It's a studio cam and it's good for that. Don't expect to take good outdoor/landscapes with this

[@fredh999harris8]

"don't expect..." . Nonsense, this camera is a superb outdoor/landscape tool - easily beats hell out of the mark4.

[@sujamohamed9240]

I have 5Ds that's amazing

[@lepadus7926]

If you think the newest camera is going to give you better photographs you are going to have a bad day.

[@DessieTots]

Hope you removed the acne from the guys nose? Just too much detail there. I take it that the Pentax 6x7 is in the bin now?

[@firemusic82]

Haha.."you need 2 bodies and multiple lenses". Lets spend stupid money on camera gear so we can make lame head shot after head shot after head shot. Sounds good to me!

[@glowbright]

+Edward James i think he's just saying you should always have a backup incase of a malfunction or accident on the day of the shoot...

[@michaelbell75]

+Edward James Yes, every pro needs two bodies because if you are on a shoot and the client has paid for a location, hair/makeup and your fee and your camera goes out, saying "oh well I guess the shoot is over" spells disaster. Good luck getting more work after that. This guy is a true pro, stick to internet trolling. You know nothing.

[@firemusic82]

Michael Bell I know that i've shot several weddings with one body and one lens. And the shoots keep coming. A pro shouldn't be labeled as such based on the amount of gear he has. Because those kinds of photographers typically have no talent. They have so much gear that they can't truly learn how to use it. Have fun with your amazing boring head shots with your loads of gear.

[@Bass_Tee]

+Edward James you didn't get it ... stay with your one and only body and pray, that this won't break at the beginning of the wedding...

[@pscully1969]

+Edward James I'm willing to bet one or two of his "lame" headshot sessions will pay for a 5DS body, maybe two.

[@resistenzainutile]

that haircut...

[@PaavoLammikko]

The music is so bad I have hard time watching the whole video...

[@Crewchief227]

Wow it's amazing how much they paid him to tap-dance around all the faults with this camera and how un cutting edge it really is.

[@PruskiWawrzyniec]

Joel Aparicio It's a review of the camera that has not been released yet. It's obvious that Canon made some agreement before they've let him get his hands on it. I think that it was still a reasonably honest review. Peter commented on the qualities of the camera, mentioned the downside which is poor performance at high ISO and shown the examples. He said it clearly that this is not a low light camera. He said what type of photography it is suited and not suited for. Also you accuse him of being biased and at the same time you make a clear judgement about the performance of a camera that so far very few people had their hands on. And I bet that you are not one of them.