Paul Feyerabend - Problems of Microphysics (1963)

[@Tymbus]

Wow! Oh well, I got what I asked for and more;-Feyerabend takes on Khun's saccount of the history of science. That's filled up my weekend!

[@yoramgt]

25:20 "Unlike perhaps in politics". Why? It seems that the battlecry should be the same, for the same reasons. Pluralism is required for progress, as well as for intellectual well-being. But credit should definitely be given for the insertion of that "perhaps".

[@Mujangga]

So he's saying that Microphysics can't be determined by relying on a foundation of Classical Science?

[@syedadeelhussain2691]

He should have mentined Copernicus

[@pectenmaximus231]

the work for which he is best known, “Against Method”, makes a central argument based on Copernicus

[@jalepezo]

Like why philosophers want to be seen like bad boys, they are nerds, except for Plato who was buff and still a fan fic boi