As a passenger, it helps me understand what the people up front are doing while I'm working on my 2nd donut and already have spilt coffee on my shirt.
@BullDog-r3r2 ай бұрын
Lmao
@Hunter-ze4euАй бұрын
The bigger commercial aircraft have more than this to deal with. He can probably fly through all these procedures if he wasn't explaining all this to us
@captainchaos36673 ай бұрын
Until seeing your hand I had no idea if this was real or in-game, the visuals have become that good. The movements could have been done with Track IR or something.
@ChristopheLimpalair2 ай бұрын
Same lol I thought this was MSFS footage until I saw his hand. The lights outside looked a little bit pixelated. So wild.
@greentelly2802 ай бұрын
Same... probably due to some blurring in the capture but it is crazy to think that... and it's just the beginning. We all thought that FS2020 would be hard to beat but FS2024 is visually even better.
@DarthVenomuss2 ай бұрын
same, sad realization
@SwiftractPtss2 ай бұрын
For real, we have came so far in gaming graphics. Its almost indistinguishable from reality.
@edwindungdung19982 ай бұрын
Literally clicked on this video to check whether the footage was in-game or real life. MSFS has some really good emulation, and I have been fooled in the past. The camera movement felt like it could've been VR honestly.
@UberGeek3 ай бұрын
That is very realistic MSFS 2024. I gotta get me that VR that you are using . 😂 Thanks for sharing.
@grimreaper686003 ай бұрын
I thought the same, what a realistic video
@espido3 ай бұрын
@@grimreaper68600 same here, i said damn that's some good graphics until i saw his finger 😆
@wilddoktor2 ай бұрын
I don't think I can afford whatever GPU he's using! 😂
@Alexis672702 ай бұрын
Liar, is not MSFS 24, is MSFS 38
@DarkAndVelvetNights2 ай бұрын
@@wilddoktorMust be the IRL 5090 super
@Nfarce2 ай бұрын
I found your "Don't rush things" in these Honeywell avionics memorable! My father was a USAF pilot for eight years between 1962-1970. After he got out he went into the tech industry and computer engineering. So he knew tech. Our first home computer he bought us was in 1980, an Apple II, and he bought Sublogic's Flight Simulator for it. I remember him telling me way back then as a kid to not "rush" things and let the computer do its thing before hitting keyboard keys and moving the joystick. I remembered this lesson when I started flying in the late 1980s and letting the old school King NAV/COM avionics take their time warming up in our aero club 172s. Even today when I try and flip my Xfinity DVR cable box too quick between channels from time to time it has a meltdown. Additionally, I have thoroughly enjoyed MS2020 for the past three and a half years with a dedicated $3K PC built for it, but I still have to let it "settle down" before jumping into things. Some things never change! 😄 Great content and thanks!
@blackbrd992 ай бұрын
Damn I can't wait for the release, the VR looks incredible.
@maroofr2 ай бұрын
I skipped the part that said preparation. I was blown away by the graphics until I realized I'm witnessing real life lol!!!
@Denis0763 ай бұрын
Thank you so much! You’ve done an amazing job, and you truly stand out from other KZbinrs with such class. Many pilots who create videos could really learn from your example. Keep up the great work, and I’m sure your channel will grow exponentially!
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
@@Denis076 Wow…glad you enjoyed it! Cheers.
@tristandoran6013 ай бұрын
Thanks for the real world information and tips. Very much appreciated from a non pilot.
@wilddoktor2 ай бұрын
Wow! I'm glad the Tube thought I needed to see this content. It was right! I'm an IT Professional working at a company that owns both a PC-24 and a Bell 429. Over the last year I've gotten to be a pax on both many dozens of times. The pilots all know me as "the flight sim guy", and I love talking with them about the details of flying. But I've never had the chance to be there for the PC-24 startup procedures...just can't make myself get to the airport at 4am. 😂 I was so happy to hear that there will be a PC-24 in MSFS 2024!! And your video just got me even more jazzed for Nov 19. Thanks...you have a new subscriber!!
@ThaFuzzwood2 ай бұрын
THe level of texturing detail on those hands are amazing!
@MrMihawes2 ай бұрын
Love the PC-24 and Bell 429, how did I not know about this channel! Loved this video. As a pilot of light aircraft who would love to fly this aircraft but probably never will, I appreciate the detail in the video. Now, got to watch all the other videos in the channel. Please!!! keep them coming.
@cyberpunkalphamale2 ай бұрын
I love both of those. I think you will fly one.
@OngoingFreedom2 ай бұрын
I fly CJ4’s and Falcon 900’s for my company. We *almost* pulled the trigger on replacing our two CJ4’s with PC24’s but didn’t, and upon seeing your video in my suggested feed I was fascinated to watch. The PC24 didn’t have the range we needed the CJ4 for so we didn’t pull the trigger, and watching your video I see that we made a good choice, though I would have loved to learn this airplane. Thanks for posting.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@@OngoingFreedom well I’m glad I could help but sorry the pc24 didn’t work for your application. It’s a fantastic platform though. Let me know if I can help with any real world details.
@OngoingFreedom2 ай бұрын
@ just one question for now: did you go 19 minutes of video (and maybe more) on BATs 1/2 without accepting the GPU (understanding you were conducting an instructional video)? If you selected it earlier I missed it. If not, that felt long but every airplane is different, and protecting the battery on a jet is something that took me a bit to embrace (reasons). Thanks again, and greatly appreciate your quick response.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@ there is a little editing magic there…so not quite that long. But these lithium ion batteries are able to hold their voltage much longer than tradition NiCad or lead acid. In anyway, BAT 1 runs the avionics and BAT 2 is for starting. You’ll see little to no amps are drawn on BAT 2, preserving it for the start. The 24 is very well designed for GPU independence.
@OngoingFreedom2 ай бұрын
@@more-left-pedal yep, went back and found where you were still using battery (and could tell you had Li-ion) and then later had GPU input. The CJ4 originally had a single Li-ion (we had two 4’s) and made it through the transition away from that. The Gen 3 CJ4 supposedly returns to its roots, battery wise. Again, fascinating video for me. BTW, you appear to have the patience of explaining things as a CFI, just curious if that’s true.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@@OngoingFreedom lol no just dual ATPs and have a 10 year old that is obsessed with anything that flies.
@helderalmeida3417Ай бұрын
This is the most amazing virtual flight simulator setup I've ever seen. Everything looks so real!
@ThorNjord3 ай бұрын
You are the best! Love your channel, this plane and the heli. It’s awesome to see you will be giving us insight into it. 👍🏻
@southof.nowhere6096Ай бұрын
For split second I was thinking "wow! that cabin lighting is insanely realistic" xD
@hunyesmith032 ай бұрын
It’s amazing we’ve come to a point where I genuinely thought it was a VR version of MSFS. Only think that gave it away was your hand!
@superedilaviation78353 ай бұрын
The best videos, more please! Starting the engine like in this video is very nice; great videos indeed.
@brianharris18304 күн бұрын
Tremendous video and effort, thank you
@cbboiii11002 ай бұрын
Ayeee I live in San Antonio. I can watch the planes take off to the North and East from the house. Maybe I'll get lucky one day and watch this beauty fly. Happy flying
@ronbrock28712 ай бұрын
After flying B737's for the last 30 yrs, I am amazed with the tech advances in avionics. Very nice job showing power-up sequencing. Looks like a very nice aircraft.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@@ronbrock2871 thank you
@alexschmitz4910 күн бұрын
It's scary when you start watching the video, and think, what type of setup is he running? Then you see his arm and realize, it's real life. I thought initially it was FS2024.
@ur_local_person-86 күн бұрын
Haha real, it said “MSFS-2024” and when I heard his voice I was like “whaat?”
@markscars10692 ай бұрын
Really looking forward to the PC-24 in, er, ‘24 :) and really hope Asobo do it justice. Checked across KZbin a few months ago for some P24 content and little came back. And now here you are. Awesome 👍 Subbed
@jowah2 ай бұрын
Thanks for this. I trained for my PPL at KSAT in 2004. So much of this process used to be manual paperwork and radio calls. It's surprising how much has changed since then.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
Indeed!
@moog2472 ай бұрын
This was super interesting and puts the faff of getting dressed to ride my motorcycle into context 😂
@00001234523 ай бұрын
wow this is gold, thank you so much mate
@klauss.26962 ай бұрын
this video is literally so cool.
@andresvalencia-motorsportn73242 ай бұрын
Ive been so used to the CJ4 (in the sim) that this cockpit seems super alien to me but i love it. I will try to follow this step by step ms2024 and see if they modeled everything you are doing
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
Sadly the PC24 in MSFS is pretty half baked. I’ve been getting tons of messages asking to do a differences video but I’ve just been so busy. I’ll try and find some time.
@Slowly_succeedingАй бұрын
I’m not a pilot but I had a chance to talk with one of the Honeywell engineers who designed the (upcoming?) avionics for the PC-12. It was very interesting to hear about the planning that goes into the placement of the computers to minimize the amount of space being taken up, while getting adequate cooling to them and such. Wish I was more knowledgeable so that I could’ve asked better questions 😅 Anyway, thanks for sharing this from your point of view. Who knows, I may also be in the front seat someday!
@alang9112 ай бұрын
BRILLIANT THANK YOU !
@lpg123382 ай бұрын
Very interesting, thanks for sharing. 😎👍
@craigchadwick_2 ай бұрын
Great video! I work at APC and see you around often, just too nervous too approach and say hi. Great video and maybe one day we will cross paths! I am getting my IFR currently out of CCR.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
Congrats on getting your IFR! CCR is a great training airport. Say hi anytime! 👍🏼👍🏼
@craigchadwick_2 ай бұрын
@@more-left-pedal I’ll stop by when I see you. I help out in the hangar just to the left of ya!
@sadface2 ай бұрын
I thought it was a game until I saw his hand, my brain was working overtime there!
@seanfarley17582 ай бұрын
This was awesome! Please post more videos like this. Like some others I genuinely thought this was a VR video of MSFS24! Any way you could do some explanations on IFR flying, like how to vector to your NAVAIDS as I feel like the game is pretty lacking in explaining that and I'm currently doing the trainings to get my IFR rating. Or just videos of that amazing aircraft flying around/showcasing more of the features. Thanks Captain!
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
Great idea
@brandonchappell15353 ай бұрын
Perfect, cheers man !
@alejcarba3 ай бұрын
amazing video!
@PilotFARAIM3 ай бұрын
Very helpful video. I hope to fly the Pilatus PC-24 someday.
@marcosavila82153 ай бұрын
Jezzzz MS2024 looks so good..for a moment i thought it was real
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
@@marcosavila8215 😂
@RotatingBombWithADogOnIt3 ай бұрын
Will you be doing PC-24 tutorials in MSFS 2024? I'd love to see you covering just about everything to do with this aircraft. VFR and IFR flights too.
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
Sure why not! Let's hope that they model the avionics well.
@RotatingBombWithADogOnIt3 ай бұрын
@@more-left-pedal Thanks for responding. Looking forward to it. By the way, if you don't know what VATSIM is, I suggest you look into that to maximize the realism of virtual flights.
@Bell429Turbo3 ай бұрын
How about doing one for the Bell 429.
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
@@Bell429Turbo Sure thing.
@Bell429Turbo3 ай бұрын
@more-left-pedal Thanks that's great. Just don't see any other doing this with the bell. All seem to be the Roberson.
@twharton12 ай бұрын
Thank you for posting. With all the automation doesn't the Honeywell system offer the capability to have ForeFlight transfer the flight plan to the panel? Additionally I'm curious why you are requesting FL43? I thought west bound flights were even numbers (ex FL44 or 42) and eastbound odd. If I remember my old John and Martha King training videos...east is least and west is best.🙂
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
Yes it does. I just use Datalink because it’s slightly faster.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
Per your other question regarding altitudes. Everything changes above FL410. Remember that RVSM altitudes start at FL290 and go to FL410. You are allowed 1,000' of separation inside RVSM ONLY if you are RVSM capable. Otherwise it's 2.000' of separation. Therefore above FL410 separations switch to 2,000'. So then Eastboard your options are FL410, FL450, etc and Westbound would be FL400, FL430, etc. Now you can request split altitudes like FL420, 440, but it would be non-standard and they will not give them if there are traffic constraints. Hope this helps.
@salmopr2 ай бұрын
I thought it was flight sim till I saw your hang, the reason I say this is because my sim look alike, wow
@fjs1111Ай бұрын
That cockpit is so sleek, clean and modern it almost looks fake wow
@Tygrecor2 ай бұрын
Hi, it's a very instructive video, since you show the step-by-step procedures in great detail. Also, the Pilatus PC-24 is an aircraft with a very clean and uncomplicated cockpit. Thank you for sharing the video. Would it be possible for you to share the checklist of normal procedures? If not, could you make a video showing all the procedures in all categories?. Thx.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@@Tygrecor thanks. Yes I’ll work on that
@leexgx11 күн бұрын
How catastrophic would it be if those two battery switches were flipped off mid flight would the generators from the engines still keep the plane online (you would think critical switches like that would have flip covers on them for gen 12 and battery 12) I can imagine trying to restart the plane while you’re flying could be a bit jarring
@more-left-pedal11 күн бұрын
LOL...well I've never tried this in the SIM and I'm not even sure it would be modeled properly. But I'll give it my best shot to explain what would happen. If only Bat 1 and 2 were shut off in flight, the respective GENs would power the buses on their respective sides. Would you have some CAS messages for the batteries being off but beyond that, it would just be a matter of flipped them back on. Pretty uneventful. Now if all 4 were shut off, both gens and both batteries, well everything would go dark on you. However, the engines would continue to run since the FADEC have their own engine driven power supply, the throttles would continue to respond, and you would be able to control the aircraft from the yoke (no hydraulics). You'll then have to get everything back online. Needlessly to say, don't touch them in flight unless required by procedure in response to an EP.
@enderwiggen36382 ай бұрын
One of the key things with my setup is my now ex-wife complained about the amount of space it was taking up … I agreed and kicked her out of the house so I could use her craft side of the room to build my copilot side of the cockpit.
@luisarevalo71729 күн бұрын
Just do whatever you have to do and get me to my destination.
@MekazaBitrusty2 ай бұрын
It’s crazy how complicated flying is compared to driving. It’s only one extra dimension. I can’t see flying cars ever being a thing. 😄
@jjstevenzАй бұрын
I love Primus Epic 2.0
@CubeAtlantic2 ай бұрын
i don't even pilot that plane, but this is interesting & high-quality. 💜✅️👏
@Topofdescent552 ай бұрын
Awesome thanks a lot!!!!
@PhilippSeven3 ай бұрын
I think you can use simbrief data as datalink data in msfs.
@lucasschofield8716Ай бұрын
I was tripping like "man the Graphics are amazing, in VR? Is that a hand?! Wait..."
@qthemerrybandofanons44813 ай бұрын
They can do it. DCS has full military datalink simulated and it can be used from handing off target information, sending messages and much more.
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
@@qthemerrybandofanons4481 Wow that’s amazing.
@Hunter-ze4euАй бұрын
When you insert your flight plan, our EFB on MSFS2024 has a "send flight plan to aircraft" button then on a pilatus aircraft, ill then click activate and guide the aircraft to the green route and once it turns pink, im able to use autopilot to follow my route and set up my altitude and vertical speed etc.
@DoogieFresh2 ай бұрын
Holy smokes!! What graphic card are you using?!? Looks so real. It looks like your actual hand!
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@@DoogieFresh 😂
@celricaviation2 ай бұрын
I hope the PC24 in MSFS2024 will be that deep simulated then your aircraft you showed us ;)
@aidenstanley73052 ай бұрын
The flight plan uplink is actually a thing in MSFS for many aircraft, thanks to Simbrief integration
@exploretheworldbyairplane3 ай бұрын
Can't wait to fire her up in MSFS2024! Great video! Thank you! --> May there be a comparison RL PC-24 vs. MSFS2024 PC-24 once?
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
Sure that could be fun.
@larrya78222 ай бұрын
In the 70's we had to do our speeds and plot our flight using graphs, charts, flight plotter and what we called a flight computer. Which was NOT electronic ! It was like a circular slide rule. Do they still teach that ?
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@@larrya7822 yes the E6B. I had one in flight school too. It was taught when I was in flight school 15 years ago…haven’t seen one in a decade honestly. Sadly I don’t think it’s taught anymore.
@JSRRADIO3 ай бұрын
After all that I want to see you fly now lol
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
@@JSRRADIO Lol…yeah…this is the “boring” side of aviation. Maybe we need a video on cabin prep (vacuuming carpets, wiping down the cabin, loading snacks) ; )…lol Anyway, there are several flying videos up on the channel. Enjoy and be well!
@JSRRADIO3 ай бұрын
@more-left-pedal no it was not that it wa boring because it was not at all boring it just made me crave the flight aspect of set up processes. Truly loving aviation will only do that to ya I suppose lol
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
@ Ahhhh copy! I love all parts too.
@ImpendingJoker3 ай бұрын
@@more-left-pedal Kelsy over at 74Gear will help you with the snacks but you might not have any left for the PAX if he does. XD
@retinaquester3 ай бұрын
Love aviation and this technology, and fly MSFS2020 love the 787. I do have some trouble understanding automation in aviation. It's a bit of a mixed bag. So you are asked to run the checklist. while the aircraft can easily verify the setting itself. Also Explained in the video is that a engine start during automation startup causes problemes. it should be automatically prevented in the first place. If the cockpit has a long start sequency it could be inidated by a time bar. Now you have chosen a set of landmarks that tell you where the process is.
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
Well while the airplane does do “configuration checks” such as during take off, you’ll get a “NO TAKE OFF” aural alert if you have the flaps set incorrectly for example. Or you’ll get a “GEAR” aural alert below a certain radar altitude and in a certain configuration. So the automation is helping out the pilot who found himself behind the airplane but there an many phases of flight where the configuration possibilities are just too vast and only a a pilot can properly tell the automation what to do. Flows are efficiency/speed, Checklists are safety.
@retinaquester3 ай бұрын
@@more-left-pedal Thank you for you're answer. In my opinion the wost error is "NO TAKE OFF" I would like to mention with Boeing the message is: "Aircraft not in take off config". It will tell you something is wrong, then it won't mention what send of the warning. My example lead to 121 fitalities on a Helios Aircraft. Where the Airplane said that. Pilots after check-list dismissed it. and tuned out to have a disabled cabinpressure system. But I do agree automation on the navigation part must be great compared to pre-GPS. Can't wait to have a look at the PC-24 in MSFS.
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
@ No system is perfect. Have a great time exploring the PC24 in MSFS.
@DownTheRabbit-Hole2 ай бұрын
Freqs are rotary knob only or can we use keypad? Great single pilot cert aircraft. Even has big boy toys, like autothrottle. I expect this to be medivac aircraft of choice due to large cabin doors. Thanks for video. Are manuals on internet for msfs 2024 users? Love the Longitude G5000 with AT, nosewheel steering, and thrust rev, but this aircraft could take its place for me. AT really makes single hand much safer and easier.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@@DownTheRabbit-Hole you can change freq with both rotary knobs and the TCS (touch screen controller) there are always 2-3 ways to do everything in the avionics package. You are right, you find features in the 24 you only see on Gulfstreams or Falcons. It’s really in a league of its own.
@RyanRoberts152 ай бұрын
This may be ignorance and inexperience speaking but manually inputting the flight plan seems to be waaaaaaay easier and less convoluted in an aircraft with a traditional MCDU (such as the proline 4) than slewing around with the cursor that the PC12 has.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
You're possibly correct, but I really don't have a basis for comparison outside some older Collins units. Datalink flight plan input is definitely the way to go. ; )
@dean-lv6db2 ай бұрын
Unreal, what are the hand mods and how do you get such high frame rates?
@_PSantos3 ай бұрын
Hi Thank you for all the inputs for the PC24, I do have a question, what are the differences between the US and Europe procedures for the same Aircraft, PC24? Thank you again
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
@@_PSantos There are subtle differences between EASA and FAA rules but for the most part very similar. I could answer better if you had a specific question on a certain procedure.
@_PSantos3 ай бұрын
@@more-left-pedal Thank you for coming back. I have no specific questions but, and I´m just hopping that you will be posting some more of these wonderful videos, chances are we´ll be learning a lot from you, so if there are to many or to big of a difference things wont be as easy. Been from Europe myself that´s where I´ll be using the PC24. Again, thank you so much for the start of a great thing (I hope)....
@subwhiffy02Ай бұрын
plane is so clean that i thought this is a sim
@more-left-pedalАй бұрын
It’s my office…got to keep it tidy. 😊
@timarb51772 ай бұрын
Multi functional display...no shit. I tested Multiple Function Color Displays for the B-52. So cool
@SWAFanPilot2 ай бұрын
Sexy airplane! Can't wait for FS2024 too.. 15 days!!
@Teslafreek2 ай бұрын
How is the app caled you use on the iPad?
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
ForeFlight
@JoeDFWAviation2 ай бұрын
10:00 flight plan uplink will probably be a simbrief import and/or MSFS world map import with their new flight planning system.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@@JoeDFWAviation sweet that would be awesome
@rondootf6321Ай бұрын
Bro I thought it was flight sim the whole thing for a good 10 seconds. I said bro has the rtx 5090 pre release
@more-left-pedalАй бұрын
😂
@caprica_132 ай бұрын
Never could warm up to honeywell systems, not even their more traditional FMS boxes. Call me old fashioned but my ProLine 21 could accomplish all of this much faster, and there is no "waiting for amber boxes to go away" - you power it on and it's ready to go. I feel like Collins just does it better, with the exception of their newer fusion systems, those are trash. Unrelated PC-24 question though, how often do you guys actually use QPM to do all this kinda like how we'd use the APU. And can you cool/heat the cabin with just GPU power or do you need bleed air for that?
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
Yea I don't disagree. It's a little how I feel about the flight deck in the Bell 429. It's a fantastic single pilot IFR platform that has served me well for nearly a decade. The Honeywell is obviously an extremely advanced path/vector based full FMS. On the surface, I agree it seems to be fussy with its million BIT checks. But, if you look at the time you save on the back end not having to do a functional test of each system like most airplanes, I think it's a net benefit. Either way, it's the future and I'm learning to enjoy working alongside this deeper level of automation. As for your question regarding QPM, essentially Engine 2 can enter a sub-idle mode to provide 250A of power to the aircraft systems. This includes all environmental. We use it like an APU when waiting on passengers at a remote airfield without access to a GPU. It sips fuel and is pretty quiet. It's a handy feature.
@WearyArbiterАй бұрын
I like how the landing gear lever is literally right next to your knee. And by “like” I mean I hate it.
@more-left-pedalАй бұрын
@@WearyArbiter lol….you couldn’t “bump it” if you tried. It’s locked by the UMS when not in a safe envelope, and when safe it’s an “up and over” style movement. Very fool proof design.
@WearyArbiterАй бұрын
@ Honestly the PC-12 has it in the same spot and it hasn’t been an issue either. Camera gives a different perspective than when you’re sitting in the seat I think.
@381delirius9 күн бұрын
Looks real
@KAPAFlyer2 ай бұрын
As excited as I am for the PC-24......it's from Carenado, who aren't known for their systems depth (or are known for a lack of). However, a different developer is doing the systems, so it *might* wind up exceeding my expectations.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
Let’s hope that they focus on the awesome avionics.
@KAPAFlyer2 ай бұрын
@@more-left-pedal Yup. Working Title, who rebuilt the 2020 SR22 and reworked the 787, are building a custom version of the Epic Primus II for at least the PC-12.
@captainzeppos2 ай бұрын
That was an excellent presentation and I initially thought "damn those graphics, amazing"... I take it no one has seen the MSFS2024 PC-24 yet? Seeing how the real thing works and how an in-game PC-24 works may be completely different experiences if half the knobs and buttons are INOP as usual and fidelity is at a bare minimum to appeal to casual users mostly. I'd rather SWS released PC-24 like they did with PC-12. Guess we'll have to wait and see what happens. Also PC-24 will only be included in the Premium Deluxe version of MSFS2024 and I didn't want to pay $140 for this, but I now see it's only $90 at gray key sites so I'm definitely getting PD and PC-24, yay.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
Thank you for the comment! That’s too bad it isn’t included in the base level software. I’ll have to read up on this more. Cheers!
@LewehotАй бұрын
Where’s the progress bar?
@TheBks573Ай бұрын
Can never have enough cup holders!!
@rb343Ай бұрын
In flight school does it take longer to actually learn how to fly the aircraft or all the computer stuff leading up to starting the engines? 😭 I hope these never get the dreaded blue screen like a home PC. 😂
@more-left-pedalАй бұрын
By the time you learn an aircraft like this you’ve likely been a pilot for many years and have flown thousands of hours in other aircraft. The systems on the PC24 are pretty easy to learn. Initial type training is very comprehensive…once type rated your very well prepared.
@wayneschenk55123 ай бұрын
It must flow quickly with practice I’ve seen a few departures get going pretty quickly.
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
Yes but this isn’t a phase to rush. I get started one hour prior to departure, especially single pilot.
@ryanmlt12 ай бұрын
Have you tried out the PC24 in MSFS 24' yet?
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
Yes...it's disappointing. I was really hoping they would match the quality of the Longitude. It doesn't even have a TOGO button, fuel flows and air speeds are all wrong, synoptic screens are all missing. There is just too much wrong with it... I hope they continue to refine it. I've been asked to make a video about it...but I fear it will just be too much negativity. "If you can't say anything nice..."
@ryanmlt12 ай бұрын
@ That’s what I’m hearing as well. I think you should make a video. Maybe they will give it some additional attention.
@FloBorge2 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing that! Is that an iPad Mini?
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
standard size.
@jorgepadua5802Ай бұрын
Until I saw your finger I was like "ain't no way"
@bradkeener072 ай бұрын
Slightly more complicated than starting the 152 I used to get my private.
@nikolaaskaas2 ай бұрын
I thought I was watching FS2020 until I saw your hand
@JoeDFWAviation2 ай бұрын
I used to gawk at how slow the PC24 was at mach .74 but in reality it’s not all that bad. Definitely faster than a turboprop…..or a car lol
@JoeDFWAviation2 ай бұрын
Can’t wait til I get fs2024 to try the pc24 for myself 👍🏻
@JoeDFWAviation2 ай бұрын
Do you ever run into problems with sequencing into an airport with the airliners? Especially because of the slow mach speed.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@@JoeDFWAviationno not at all. We can fly 280 knots (290 is our VMO) which is usually the fastest speed you see on most arrivals. Then when you get close into the field we can easily match speeds with the big boys by just landing flaps 15 instead of 33. But if you don’t think ahead, it’s true they aren’t expecting a jet to have a 91 knot ref speed 😆
@JoeDFWAviation2 ай бұрын
@@more-left-pedal 😂
@RyanRoberts152 ай бұрын
Do you not run into issues with battery degradation doing all this prep with the GPU turned off? Seems like a lot to be doing on battery power only. In the airplane I fly we have a limitation of 5 minutes for avionics cooling before AC power must be established.
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
The PC24 has these amazing Lithium Ion batteries from TrueBlue that are incredible. Not only do they hold their voltage for a much longer period of time, BAT1 can run all of the avionics, preserving BAT2 for the engine start. You'll see that there is a SOC (state of charge) indicator under the respective battery on the bottom MFD synoptic page. As long as that is in the green, you are good to go. Once you get external power or an engine online, they charge back up super fast.
@RyanRoberts152 ай бұрын
@ that’s amazing! Super cool info! Thanks for the reply.
@HeckyReckyOfficial2 ай бұрын
I wanna see what happens when you proceed to battery 1 and then let the battery run down, how it will be rendered in game
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@@HeckyReckyOfficial They don’t even have a TOGO button…you think the charge level is going to change over time? The PC24 in game is a disaster. They have a lot of work to do.
@johnmitchell267213 күн бұрын
Do you accept private flights 😊feel safe already, seeing that your better than an apple watch
@KB-dg2gr2 ай бұрын
when you push those levers forward gets ya speed are they are to push or little resistance
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
They are very smooth with a little resistance. There is no friction adjustment
@KB-dg2gr2 ай бұрын
@more-left-pedal oooo ok thanks fur the reply
@sergey793 ай бұрын
Who is releasing PC24 for FS?
@mattsedgwick3082Ай бұрын
Ok what happens if your cockpit goes dark then what you lose all your instruments that’s why I hate glass cockpits same thing goes for boats too
@more-left-pedalАй бұрын
The systems are extremely well designed and redundant. Besides this screen technology having been tested for millions of operational hours, the 4 display units sit across different dual data, power and graphics processors. Any one or multiple of the systems can fail and you’ll retain full capability. If there is a complete failure of both system we have a third fully independent ESIS back up PFD that can help get us safely on the ground. I’d be pretty comfortable with these operational odds.
@mattsedgwick3082Ай бұрын
@ thank you
@mattsedgwick3082Ай бұрын
@@more-left-pedal so essentially there’s a backup for the backup for the backup lol
@cmon89Jarhead89cmonАй бұрын
Why msfs 2024 in title?
@more-left-pedalАй бұрын
Because the PC24 just came out in MSFS 24 and I was asked to make this video by people interested in understanding how the aircraft is booted up.
@EmeryE23 ай бұрын
Ngl I thought this was a sim with eye tracking at first.
@more-left-pedal3 ай бұрын
Haha just shows how amazing modern graphics are!
@EmeryE23 ай бұрын
Precisely!
@LateNightFire3 ай бұрын
Right? I was like "no way these graphics are that good"
@leifashleyАй бұрын
Why does this say MSFS 2024?
@more-left-pedalАй бұрын
Because when I made this video it was because MSFS 2024 was about to come out with the PC24 and people were asking for a walk through on the avionics.
@381delirius9 күн бұрын
even the finger is realistic
@Sherminator20102 ай бұрын
Just to avoid confusion this is not MS2024 and it is not VR - This is real life and it just to show how it will work for the upcoming MS2024 version
@leonardusl51412 ай бұрын
Why can't you turn on both batteries at the same time?
@more-left-pedal2 ай бұрын
@@leonardusl5141 the initialization of BAT 2 starts a host of system BIT checks that can only begin after certain systems are initialized after BAT 1. Basically things need to happen in order.
@luka9083 ай бұрын
at the beginning i thought it was msfs new graphics before i saw the hand xD