We fly the sleek, new, mid-sized PC-24, a jet that can handle some of the toughest landing strips you can throw at it.
Пікірлер: 200
@kurtroosli57135 жыл бұрын
PC24 a Legend right after its Launch
@brianb55945 жыл бұрын
Just need the winning lottery numbers! Sweet!
@rodolfolasparri5 жыл бұрын
"What makes a plane fly?" asked the instructor...."Lift" said one student...."Thrust" said another "Wrong!"....said the instructor......."money makes a plane fly"
@brianb55945 жыл бұрын
Rodolfo Lasparri right on! LOL
@edmonddantes16175 жыл бұрын
thats only 8.9million usd. very affordable. but one think i dislike this plane is the position of lavatory
@paulgarthhypnotherapy99834 жыл бұрын
AOPA's Super Cub Giveaway program has to run out of inventory at some point. The PC-24 is a great second option. Just putting it out there...
@JRudd3 жыл бұрын
Exactly!!!
@richardmasters84244 жыл бұрын
This is such a pretty aircraft - I want one!
@angelotig5 жыл бұрын
Love that “Space Age” glass dash!!!
@VagabundoOMC4 жыл бұрын
The cartels are going to love this!
@nick_yeah4 жыл бұрын
No cargo door, no deal - Carlos.
@Altenholz3 жыл бұрын
They know how to build airplanes, even in this category!
@rpnanda92693 жыл бұрын
Really happy to see the performance of pc24 amazing
@rthelionheart5 жыл бұрын
I drive an 18-year-old compact car, how did I end up here!?😂
@fahadkazi71254 жыл бұрын
i do not even have that
@manganvbg904 жыл бұрын
Goals man
@jeanmacagnan63674 жыл бұрын
Tem que fazer conexão aqui em Várzea Grande aeroporto marechal
@nyariemarcy3344 жыл бұрын
Dream big 😂
@smartcatcollarproject56993 жыл бұрын
Maybe a plastic model, or a Chinese "Pilatus PC-24 mug", on e-Bay ? Much lower maintenance costs...
@andrewsmactips5 жыл бұрын
Plus it looks great.
@mobuvat5 жыл бұрын
Probably my best medium range PJ!
@andresrudelli68925 жыл бұрын
Beautiful aircraft !!!
@f900ex55 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for the Pilatus PC-24ER
@RobinsM5 жыл бұрын
Thats what I'm wondering if they will come out with an Enhanced version like Honda Jet and Cirrus did with their new jet models
@UncleKennysPlace4 жыл бұрын
Yeah. Need SFO to HNL range.
@-smm17985 жыл бұрын
Perfect! My dream!
@jericogaming19524 жыл бұрын
I'm in love with this beauty!
@ChaklitTea3 жыл бұрын
When i buy it I’ll charter the hell out of it
@blairjoyce37784 жыл бұрын
Excellent reliable PC-24 .. 🇦🇺😉🙂👍
@beno1775 жыл бұрын
Who is better then Tom...Great work Tom. Tks.
@airzulu27333 жыл бұрын
Great looking aircraft.
@christophmeyer91295 жыл бұрын
Good job Steve )))
@ChrisZoomER4 жыл бұрын
The window shades look like blinds, how cool is that?!😀
@charlesreed36725 жыл бұрын
Fancy: But I think I will stick with my PC-12. Its paid in full!
@heavyizthacrown-58425 жыл бұрын
Agreed!
@Smokeyr674 жыл бұрын
I’ve ordered my PC 24, I wish it was as cheap to fly as a PC 12, but that’s life, you get what you pay for.
@gregbuck7014 жыл бұрын
My wife and I both like the "12" alot. But for 1 to 1.5 less you can pretty much restore a very low time Marquise to a fantastic level, cruise 300 +, land and t/o on the same type runways, or worse.....oh...and be 100+ kts or so quicker with an engine out.
@daniell18694 жыл бұрын
@@Smokeyr67 i've ordered 3 PC-24s and a backup PC-12 for good measure. why not? god gave me money so have to use it somehow
@Smokeyr674 жыл бұрын
Daniel L cool, did they throw in the floor mats and fluffy dice for you?
@peachtrees275 жыл бұрын
440kts cruise with a 95kt over the fence? Talk about an unusual wing...
@Blazingspitfire5 жыл бұрын
more like 420kts.
@DanFrederiksen5 жыл бұрын
@@Blazingspitfire really? a weed reference?
@Blazingspitfire5 жыл бұрын
@@DanFrederiksen what?
@lootbox2895 жыл бұрын
@@DanFrederiksen his name is literally blazingspitfire. it better be a weed reference.
@thisismagacountry13185 жыл бұрын
@@DanFrederiksen It's legal, you know
@kongazizi68704 жыл бұрын
Simply fantastic and an irresistible mid jet aircraft to fly wherever you want to. Thanks so much for this meaningful information on KZbin and really looking forward for more of these interesting flights on your KZbin channel. Regards. From The Flight Deck .
@gjman19724 жыл бұрын
I just got evicted from my apartment maybe I’ll move into this plane
@sapede4 жыл бұрын
Impressive craft.
@Flightsworldwidevideos4 жыл бұрын
Awesome jet!!
@topofthegreen2 жыл бұрын
This will give the Phenom a run for its money.
@wanderleyapparecidovieira22824 жыл бұрын
That's the plane ! For sure!
@mvanphilips5 жыл бұрын
Great jet, but 2000 mile range is fairly short in this segment. No nonstop intercontinental flights possible. Maybe in the future?
@karlsandin45155 жыл бұрын
fam van Philips it’s niche is for short and soft field opps , I assume if they upped the weight and fuel tank it would be counter productive to such, but what do I know
@UncleKennysPlace5 жыл бұрын
That range is typical in this segment. There aren't really any single pilot jets that can reliably reach Hawaii.
@RobinsM5 жыл бұрын
@@karlsandin4515 If they Upped the weight they wouldn't be able to get single pilot certification
@mvanphilips5 жыл бұрын
@NonyaBusiness! My mistake. I was thinking of Phenom 300E (only 1971 Nm though, but extremely likable nonetheless) and the Citatation C4J (barely 2165Nm, so not really that longer range). But it would be interesting to see with mix biofuel and hybrid engines coming into the market in 10yrs time, that eventually these planes will have a longer range, long enough to reach NY-Paris none stop.
@dekster14LP4 жыл бұрын
@@RobinsM Why is that? What is the link between weight and single pilot certification? (serious question)
@erikrussi50955 жыл бұрын
Why do I watch these videos? It's Grant Cardone's fault. Now I need to follow his advice and get rich.
@zaheerkader74264 жыл бұрын
10x that shit and get a jet. 💥
@darrelpatzner99264 жыл бұрын
Not a problem Erik. We have a plan for that
@ols8844 жыл бұрын
Bs from fake rich liars
@dougball3284 жыл бұрын
So is the Tom Horne doing the flying a former F-16 pilot and GD engineer?
@sugershakify5 жыл бұрын
The coolest plane nobody can buy even if you had the money.
@purplemonkeydishwasher93603 жыл бұрын
Does the pc-24 share the same Honeywell primus avionics suite as the pc-12? It looks a little different than the one on pc-12ng.
@segredosdotiosam99894 жыл бұрын
Love the Navitimer.
@markdstump3 ай бұрын
Fun video
@philgooddr.78503 жыл бұрын
A flying Swiss watch...
@rpnanda92693 жыл бұрын
Can after sales service available in India
@paulbickley6585 жыл бұрын
Very impressed!
@aleksandrnestrato5 жыл бұрын
What do you mean predecessor? - 0:30 'Predecessor' is usually something that was before and gave birth to something new. In industry that also means 'previous model'. I don't think Pilatus will give away their share on the market and just leave the sector they have created. Especially now when copycat Cessna Denali is here.
@joelclark46105 жыл бұрын
The PC12 was before the PC24, Pilatus continues to produce PC12’s and I doubt they have any plans to stop
@bradleybarker96335 жыл бұрын
Aleksandr Nestrato agree. Poor wording.
@ACPilot4 жыл бұрын
Love it ♥️
@drpatriot20014 жыл бұрын
The Drug lords aircraft of choice!!!!
@midas19294 жыл бұрын
Australian Flying Doctors plane of choice!
@sircognac123 жыл бұрын
Can you fly this single pilot?
@omerinkucukdunyas97914 жыл бұрын
Süper , çok güzel hayırlı Ramazanlar
@ankurdahiya10924 жыл бұрын
what if that cargo door comes out in air.
@TJ-USMC5 жыл бұрын
"NICE !!!"
@DanielMorales-dz4nv5 жыл бұрын
Why it doesn't have winglets?
@gregbuck7014 жыл бұрын
A properly designed wing.
@Bushy_P5 жыл бұрын
Low stall speeds are great, this looks like an amazing aircraft. Especially when you consider the Medevac mission. My question, coming from a Canadian Medevac B350 Captain, what is the perfomance for this aircraft out of short runways 4000 feet or less, when there is a contaminated runway? It is my understanding that this aircraft has no reverse thrust, it concerns me that balanced field length will be a limiting factor with a contaminated runway.
@pokethewoke5 жыл бұрын
What do you mean with contaminated? It can land on on gravel!
@Bushy_P5 жыл бұрын
Daniel D. Runway ice or water on the runway.
@TonyA47665 жыл бұрын
Does it come with a bumper to bumper warranty?
@Shurgazy23 жыл бұрын
Красавчик!!!
@12345fowler5 жыл бұрын
Interesting hinsight
@mosesImmanuel-sc6zy5 жыл бұрын
How much miles to the gallon Is there a number to number waranty
@vinomsikol46814 жыл бұрын
My goal is to win the lottery this year. Once I hit it, I'll place my order.✌️
@mohsin1784 жыл бұрын
And what about flying lessons?
@terezacardona40795 жыл бұрын
Hermoso me voy a comprar uno ✈
@ivanmercado58315 жыл бұрын
Bathroom?
@ChloeLouiseeB3 жыл бұрын
Why am I watching this. I fly a Cessna 172 😂😂😂😂😂
@salvadoralberto93295 жыл бұрын
i need to win the mega
@savagekingx13215 жыл бұрын
Very comfortable but it should've been longer then it would have been the best
@savagekingx13215 жыл бұрын
And ur point is?
@savagekingx13215 жыл бұрын
I meant it looks comfortable
@heavyizthacrown-58425 жыл бұрын
NonyaBusiness! AND YOU MUST BE RICH, right? Well stop harassing people on KZbin will ya?
@savagekingx13215 жыл бұрын
Thx for saying that
@AdrianA-ui1mm4 жыл бұрын
How much im goeing to pay?
@tanujsabharwal64354 жыл бұрын
Price?
@silverhorder19692 жыл бұрын
I need the cargo door since my wife has a big fifth wheel
@TheGreatLoco4 жыл бұрын
No wing tips?
@dougball3284 жыл бұрын
Unless there is a constraint on wingspan, you are always better off with more span than some kind of tip treatment. Commercial airplanes use tip treatments because of gate span constraints.
@MyLifeChronicles.4 жыл бұрын
No Toilet? The HondaJet has a toilet
@ekibajukakilima4 жыл бұрын
Hargane pinten niki pak
@sergyk95884 жыл бұрын
👍👍👍
@shawnkimbrel53203 жыл бұрын
It basically have has rocket turbine engine
@Repented0084 жыл бұрын
90-95 kts probably empty.
@giovannyvictoria42084 жыл бұрын
Muy bonito avión hojala alcance 7000kilometros y pueda volar tormentas y de noche
@logancr8264 жыл бұрын
Nooo puede volar vuelos transatlánticos lástima
@giovannyvictoria42084 жыл бұрын
Resistan tormentas y huracanes la estructura de aviones
Puedan volar 8000kilometros y tengan alas grafeno y colas grafeno y carcazas grafeno
@edwinadduran20134 жыл бұрын
❤❤❤😍😍😍😍👌👏👏👏👏
@allangamayev36145 жыл бұрын
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@giovannyvictoria42084 жыл бұрын
Nuevos tanques grafeno o fibra carbono
@starshiptrooper13025 жыл бұрын
Wish they had not raised the price to 12m.
@delantwine40815 жыл бұрын
Wow I thought it was cheaper than that
@delantwine40815 жыл бұрын
@Soul Journ You stupid for that . Ha Ha Ha 😂 you can't buy it Lol I sence your frustrated. HA HA HA HA
@halo7ification4 жыл бұрын
They raised it to 10.5 not 12,
@starshiptrooper13024 жыл бұрын
Are there better choices for less? Yes!
@superchargedpetrolhead4 жыл бұрын
When it was launched it was sold for $9.8M now they have increased it to $10.5M
@shafiqahmad94573 жыл бұрын
I am not buy this Airplane but very Good in world
@joseolivares47965 жыл бұрын
Excelente
@dennism1035 жыл бұрын
Great until a bird strike...
@DorianTMChannel4 жыл бұрын
Bird strikes can happen to any plane. And they are pretty rare
@harveysmith1004 жыл бұрын
Even with both engines taken out, that thing will glide like an Eagle and land on any dirt road or flat field.
@ederoliveira48265 жыл бұрын
Just compare the technical data with Praetor, ou at least try! :)
@jnphi15 жыл бұрын
You're right, the Praetor is well above, if we compare price, operational costs and devaluation...
@superchargedpetrolhead4 жыл бұрын
It is more of a competitor to the phenom 300 due to the price and range. The praetor jets are a class or two above this.
@nickaoke4 жыл бұрын
where the toilet at? i gotta have a shitter wherever I go
@xstensl88233 жыл бұрын
problematic potty, fix this please
@juancasas40534 жыл бұрын
$$$$?
@superchargedpetrolhead4 жыл бұрын
Around $10.8 million.
@3204clivesinclair4 жыл бұрын
The Lav is in the wrong place... had to be put there because of the large cargo door. IMO a mistake.
@gamergomali60313 жыл бұрын
H
@DanFrederiksen5 жыл бұрын
Looks like a capable bird but 11m is also a price. As Pilatus I would look to getting rid of the turboprop PC-12. The front prop roaring 20s image weighs the company and at 5m$ why would anyone buy that over a twin engine jet. I would look at two things. Making their own engines because that is such a critical cost item and they are not that difficult to make. And second, developing a design that's very easy to make, light and with very few failure points. Specifically a single piece woven body with no windows and only one small door and one minimal emergency exit, maybe rear top for water landing. Bare minimum cockpit windows and rely on camera vision. A single piece fiber body can be super light yet have extreme confidence will not rupture. The lighter the plane, the better everything else is. I would reduce the cross section for better drag and use reclined seats in a slight inward fishbone angle and use the full height of the hull, no raised floor at the middle. 4 or 6 seats plus single central pilot seat. Maybe a light weight offset second pilot option 'jump seat'. The plane could maybe be so light that a long chord wing could work without any flaps. Tremendous advantage in avoided complexity. Aim for sub 1 million dollar price tag. Sell 10k of them. Rock the world. Might even do something really aggressive as having very short fixed thin aerodynamic landing gear. Being limited to paved runways is not a huge sacrifice. And in emergency could still land on grass/dirt. Super light also makes ballistic parachute easier. I'm not sure any jets anywhere offer that?
@tdgdbs15 жыл бұрын
Turbo prop sales are still their bread and butter; for sure your recommendations will result in a better plane, but the cost of R&D and tooling make it a poor financial choice. Communications among avionics and engine are also critical; design a new avionic suite for a new engine is beyond the capability of most manufacturers; if it was that simple, Airbus and Boeing would certainly had the their fist dips. Some major manufactures even outsource certain components of the airframe, mostly wings.
@aleksandrnestrato5 жыл бұрын
Dan, honey, ask the buyers of Pilatus PC-12 why the hell did they choose front prop roaring 20s image over a twin engine jet. There are some people around the globe who received new PC-12 or pre-payed full price for it in 2019, same year you text your genius ideas. Reading the rest of it made me think only - how many aviation engineering companies did you lead/do you lead? 'Cause it all resembles childish fantasies a lot. However, I may be assumptive here, thus that's what I came up with: why don't you create your own aviation company and built such (an) airplane(s)?
@DanFrederiksen5 жыл бұрын
@@aleksandrnestrato that's a common mindless reaction. I just have to fix all the world's problems and realize all opportunities because I'm not allowed to speak about it according to your mindless pettiness. The Embraer 100 costs less and is 50% faster. And has two engines. I don't know why some buy it. Maybe the cargo door. Certainly not for the prestige. And I imagine it's horribly noisy compared to a rear engined jet.
@aleksandrnestrato5 жыл бұрын
@@DanFrederiksen Same here: ask the buyers. Both ones of Pilatus PC-12 and ones of Embraer 100. I'm not trying to blame you for something. Please, excuse me if I seem offensive to you. My point here is that I perceive your thinking model as primitive one and that's why. You seem to insist that two jet engines are better than one turboprop engine. But it's not so. First. To get permission to 'drive' jet airplane one has to get way more expensive, profound and long training. And type certification for that particular jet as well. In costs money. Or you can hire a pilot and pay him/her salary. Money again. Second. Fuel burn of a jet engine is twice more than of a turboprop. We compare one turboprop versus two jets, that means four times more fuel. Money again. Third. Flying jet means air space A where all commercial airliners fly. You have to pay for that. Also you have to accord your flightplan with certain authorities. You can't fly your own route as if you were flying in the air space G. Money again. Fourth. Jet airplanes have substantially higher speeds. All the speeds. Stall speed, rotation speed, approach speed, landing speed. That means you'll be flying fast not only when you want it, but also in every situation where you'd be glad to go a lot slower (that's why special education for jets is required btw). And if you go fast on takeoff and landing you have to use airstrips both longer and with smoother surface. That means using airports for jets. It costs more money. Money again. And the number of such airports restricts you to certain landing and takeoff locations from which and to which you will have to use some other transportation, be that a car, bus or train. Loss of time can be loss of money. Money again. The jet in example me be twice cheaper, but considering all the operational costs it can result in much higher price overall. There are numerous types of applications where you'll be happy to spent those $5million on a PC-12 and at the same time you won't find a spot for a jet, even if it costs half the price. About you. I don't think you have to fix all the world's problems and realize all opportunities, no. I never meant that. What I propose you is - get your personal experience and then judge. You write "I don't know why some buy it. Maybe the cargo door." That's what I'm talking about - you don't know. You have no information nor experience. That's why you kinda not allowed to speak about it. But it's not me not allowing you, God forbid. That's YOU who doesn't allow yourself speak about anything you don't know. Again: excuse me, Dan. Never meant to wound you. All the best!
@DanFrederiksen5 жыл бұрын
@@aleksandrnestrato phenom 100 doesn't burn 4x the fuel of a pc12. That's just not true. Most of what else you say is wrong too. It doesn't cost money to fly at high altitude.
@Henriburger15 жыл бұрын
The pilots loud fake laugh and gum falling out of his mouth is a bit distracting but nice plane.
@killingfields14244 жыл бұрын
I'm not suppose to watch this. I'm just fuckin hurting my self when I see real planes right before my eyes cause I was less than an inch closer to owning one, when my adoptive mother pull the plug and drain all my chances to become a pilot and got my own aircraft... a Shrike Commander