President DONALD TRUMP - seriously WTF?!

[@VeganTruth]

Thumbs Up to all who donate and who share this video! You guys are awesome! kzbin.info/www/bejne/mKjOeIh9lsl4Zqs

[@vigneshk198]

Trump is better than Hilarious Clinton

[@dawnhuddleston2365]

atheist vegan. voted for Trump. I am educated, married to a Mexican man, peaceful and absolutely not racist.

[@VeganTruth]

why did you vote for him? Still happy with that decision?

[@smoothiegamer6084]

Dawn Huddleston Hilary husband is vegan we could of had plant based man I'm the office

[@dawnhuddleston2365]

+TheVeganAtheist I am a Republican. I agree with Trump's platform. He is my President now and I wish him success and hope he is able to accomplish what he promised the American people.

[@Sara-706]

Dawn Huddleston: I am also in an interracial marriage, am vegan, and an atheist, and support Trump. The guy who made this video wants explanations, but no one should have to explain their political views just because they are asked.

[@dawnhuddleston2365]

+sara thanks Sara :)

[@VeganTruth]

I find the reaction in the comment section below quite enlightening. Rarely do I see such emotion on both sides of the debate. It seems a lot of people voted Trump because they disliked Hillary more and there were no other viable options. Others think he is the change the American government needed. Seems like Trump supporters here are very easily triggered and not even willing to discuss. I find it interesting how easily a person can unsubscribe from a channel, when they are confronted with someone who holds a different view on 1 topic. Interesting. I will have to look into this comment section and maybe start a new series... Stupid Trump Supporters Comments?

[@NotesFromTheJourney]

Please do make that series, I'm sure a lot of people would enjoy it including me. (: -a trump supporter

[@brideut]

TheVeganAtheist Go for it! The Internet needs a Stupid Trump Supporters Comments series.

[@brideut]

SriLankanSupremeLeader OfTheSriLankanFirstOrder Please don't compare feminists to Trump supporters. At least a good number of those SJWs look into the issues that affect non-whites with an open mind.

[@josephstout2046]

TheVeganAtheist yes, please do it

[@levijaeger1181]

And then make a video on the stupid Hilary-supporter comments? I've found quite a few silly ones. Yes, those who threatened to unsub are behaving hysterically, but your video was deliberately antagonistic. I certainly won't be unsubbing.

[@HYEOL]

... still better than Shillary

[@antonk23148]

HYEOL you know Trump wasn't the only option beside Hillary?

[@t-gmailaccount6796]

Jon 93 what about global warming is "basic"?

[@SweRaider1993]

At least she doesn't deny basic science and is willfully ignorant about the world.

[@SweRaider1993]

T-Gmail Account The evidence is overwhelming, hence the answer is obvious.

[@ImDemonWolf]

No, they are equally TERRIBLE in corruption! Gary Johnson would be better than Shillary and Drumpf and Jill Stein would have been the best out of the other 3 candidates.

[@frostbite7955]

I am vegan, atheist and voted for trump

[@brideut]

Frostbite Atheism =/= rationality.

[@mykx1386]

lol get triggered trump supporters

[@manjunathanulaganathan9152]

triggered?! LMFAO that is what libs are we didn't riot the streets, cried foul, blamed Russians, asked the electoral reps to change votes if anyone is triggered, it should be liberal cunts

[@haloshadowsnipe3014]

Triggered? Isn't that the perfect word to describe the liberals? Please cry more, I enjoy your salty tears.

[@therianet]

no snowflake, we in perpetual Christmas cince election and my boner already hurt but it worth it

[@TheAmericanPrometheus]

*"Triggered Trump supporters!!!11!!"* he said while blocking airports, breaking windows and vandalizing stores.

[@haloshadowsnipe3014]

*"YOU'RE SO TRIGGERED I'M GOING TO RIOT"*

[@JermaineSam]

Atheist vegetarian here that also supported/voted for Trump. Why? Well, things like trade and immigration as well as school choice. Stein, Hillary, Johnson or Bernie did not persuade me. My dad is also a veteran and I like that (for a long time) Trump is supportive of our veterans. With immigration, a lot of Americans and recent legal immigrants have felt neglected because of the system we built catering to "undocumented" immigrants before our own. Also the social shift to valuing feelings over real word problems. It's almost become offensive to state facts, to disagree with others and say "hey, we've been taking care of others for so long, why not pay attention to the people that FUND this country? The American people. I don't follow feminism and I've almost hated labeling myself as a vegan/vegetarian/atheist because I'd rather not be associated with a majority of people that all think Trump is literally Hitler. I'm a gay Native American atheist that supports Trump because I don't vote by my identity. I vote with my own independent mind.

[@nocturnal03]

''Also the social shift to valuing feelings over real word problems.'' Funnily enough it's Trump voters who did this. You elected an incompetent, narcissistic reality tv star simply because of the spectre of ~PC culture~ which was not even an electoral issue, and shallow us vs them populism. Bernie/Hillary, while having to appeal to millenials, are not social justice warriors but experienced politicians. Now weeks into his presidency, it's the total shitshow we all knew it was going to be, but Trumptards once again do something they accuse SJWs of doing : conspiracy theories and victimization. Can't trust ANYONE or ANYTHING that doesn't kiss Trump's ass! Fuck the free press! aww poor Donald , he's had it so hard and everyone is conspiring against him!

[@BeepDerpify]

*>Trump is supportive of our veterans* I'm finding that hard to believe. First there's this: www.cnbc.com/2017/02/14/trumps-hiring-freeze-hurts-young-veterans-who-were-already-having-trouble-getting-jobs.html Next there was he comments before the campaign that members of the military develop mental illnesses like PTSD because they are not 'strong' or 'can't handle it'. I don't know how a veteran could be okay with that kind of thought. *>With immigration, a lot of Americans and recent legal immigrants have felt neglected because of the system we built catering to "undocumented" immigrants before our own.* In what ways?

[@roebuckpayne]

Jermaine Sam The argument is where we draw the line between undocumented workers and refugees. Our drug policy has created bloody and violent conflict in our southern neighboring countries which result in people loosing their possessions, including their documentation, and ruins their lives. It is similar to the refugee crisis in Syria. Like it or not, we created that mess and should own the responsibility. Problem is, many people don't want to accept refugees so badly that they fail to realize that it really is America's responsibility. At least, this is my view. Rebuttals welcome

[@JermaineSam]

I'm going to try to respond tho these comments in one since I don't have much time to spend responding to everyone personally. 1. If you disagree with my choice on a "moral" basis that's fine, everyone has (or not) their own morals in which they conduct themselves and to argue with your set of morals is a waste of time. I voted for him and you see that as morally wrong. Cool! Now what? 2. Americans and recent legal immigrants feel neglected as a result of things like sanctuary cities and funding that is going to these "undocumented" immigrants when it could be going to education, the American poor, infrastructure and the like. 3. The social part. We have to tip toe around using terms like "undocumented" when people have broken the law to get here illegally while legal immigrants have spent their hard earned time and resources to get in line. Crime happens in bad neighborhoods and it's racist (or any numerous buzzwords) to police these neighborhoods to keep the law abiding citizens in those bad neighborhoods safe. 4. The whole "America is sticking it's nose where it doesn't belong/Americans are buying illegal drugs/starting wars therefore we need to let in everyone and their mother cuz its our fault" argument. I pay my taxes, I have never been in jail and I do not currently support any kind of real war. Why should I or anyone else be responsible that? Sure, you want to take them? Put them in your house, in your neighborhoods. You may want to take that risk but there are other people out there that don't want to take that risk.

[@BeepDerpify]

*>funding that is going to these "undocumented" immigrants* What do you mean? What funding? Could you specify? Also, you have not responded to my points about Trump and veterans. How can Trump be supportive of veterans when he says things like that that are so wrong and disrespectful? Would you tell a veteran that has PTSD that they were weak and not strong enough - and that is to blame for their PTSD?

[@BasicShapes]

How did this video get so many dislikes? Regardless of how bad you think Hillary was (and she was really quite bad) that doesn't detract from the fact that Trump is one of the biggest idiots on this entire planet, and should never have even come close to becoming president. If this is not obvious to you, especially after watching this video, then you need to open your eyes. 5:41 - I felt the same way. Couldn't believe more people didn't vote third party like I and all my friends did. Both main party choices were unacceptable.

[@CarbLoaders]

Hey, ad hominem attacks are NOT AN ARGUMENT.

[@Peasham]

Fluffy Waffles That's assuming the third party had a chance. It really didn't. Not that I think either candidates were acceptable, but that doesn't change the green party not winning.

[@nocturnal03]

it got so many dislikes because Trumpism is almost a cult at this point and vegans/atheist are not nearly as logical and rational as they claim to be. Thinking about all the militant vegans who voted for the candidate with the worse outcome for animal welfare to the point he was denounced by the Humane society, for the candidate who will scrap all little progress has been made to combat climate change, but they will nonetheless keep lecturing everyone to go vegan for the animals and the planet. Lol...

[@DylanLenn]

+CarbLoaders What ad hominem attack..?

[@WilliamAncich]

Kim Bolduc So taking an issue with the video and leaving a dislike means you're part of a cult, irrational and illogical? Incredible.

[@Pvt-Lenny]

Ratio says it all. You misread your audience.

[@wolflink9000]

True. People don't realize how many people even liberals support Trump. They just live in echo chambers.

[@josephstout2046]

WoopWoopDk his channel is not for affirming the audience's believes. the Trump issues is very divisive innature. I'm sure he knew that some people are going to be angry about his opinions.

[@Pvt-Lenny]

Well Joey. If he was not aiming at a "laugh" with his like minded fans. This was a stupid gamble of subscribers over a subject not really core to his channel. And even if he was to do a slander of Trump. Why not do it with reason and proper arguments. Instead of yet another slander edit.

[@josephstout2046]

WoopWoopDk ok....the edit in the beginning was a joke. later on in the video he used examples of how Trump is not a great leader. this video is made, because the audiences voted for it to be made.

[@haydencooper9095]

WoopWoopDk he has opinions that differ from his audience. is that a problem

[@AtheistsGoneWild_Arthur]

There's so much to call Trump out on. Calling him racist is an unnecessarily weak attack that makes your solid arguments look invalid.

[@joseantoniolago5857]

I hated both candidates .

[@Milklover1131]

jose lago you could have LITERALLY voted for anyone else i did

[@Chamelionroses]

lilkhalim I did too. I tried proscience...

[@GRBtutorials]

"Nothing makes my channel grow more than likes, shares and comments" You forgot dislikes. Dislikes, ironically, are treated exactly like likes by the KZbin algorithm. Why? Literally, nobody knows, not even the creators of the AI.

[@Thaden0]

Funny how many negative comments are already up, even when the video hasn't been up long enough to watch it. Such sheep that they don't even listen to alternate view points.

[@chadatchison145]

I'm starting to think they're bots or something because the same people show up on any video critiquing Trump and say the same thing in every comment section.

[@Thaden0]

Chad Atchison That's a good point. They did show up mighty fast to a channel that typically has a smaller and very specific audience. I think you are right.

[@dhruvab5]

Exactly... and they call us sheep. Well, to think about it, most humans are* sheep. :p

[@daniels4338]

Why would I want to watch yet another KZbinr regurgitate the same bullshit, error-laden argument we heard for a sold year?

[@Thaden0]

Daniel S You can't know it's the same if you don't watch it. It could surprise you. But more important, if you didn't want to watch it, why did you come here to comment on the video you didn't even watch?

[@XHellPriest]

Trump wants God to be taught in Public Schools.

[@tabularasa0606]

God belongs in history classes. "This is what the people in the 20th century thought, weren't they silly"

[@XHellPriest]

tabularasa0606 in a public school. You have to talk about other religions, not just one. Trump wants the schools to be taught in a Christian way. Meaning, science education is going to be harmed

[@levijaeger1181]

Hilary wanted to start WW3. Take your pick.

[@XHellPriest]

Levi Jaeger let's see if Trump starts that war, as well.

[@levijaeger1181]

Well, his words and actions indicate the opposite. Hilary didn't even attempt to hide her desire.

[@WeeWeeJumbo]

Everything is political. Don't bite your tongue on topics like this - it's your channel and you're good at clarifying difficult subjects. Terrific video, more please

[@AtheistAllosaurus]

First of all: I'm big fan of your work! When I went vegan, this was one of the first channels I subscribed to help me build up on my skepticism, and it was great to see how many people make illogical and irrational defenses for religion and meat consumption, (also this is on of the MANY channels that led me to becoming atheist agnostic). So thank you for your work! Second: I am not unsubscribing just because you and I differ slightly in a few ideas of politics. My best friend is Catholic and a Classical Liberal, and he and I can have a lengthy, intellectual, and entertaining conversation about our differing ideas of politics, sciences, and religion without being accusatory or angry at each other. (Side note, I've convinced him to go vegetarian and he keeps coming back to me on tips on how to make recipes and substitutes for animal products) Third: I understand that you're not likely to find too many intellectual and honest disagreements in the comment sections about defending Donald Trump or debunking Hilary Clinton, as that is the nature of the comment section. But if I could offer my input, I have found more profound people who voted for Donald Trump or at the very least defended Trump in his policies, and a good number of these people aren't either Conservative or American, and yet they can see the value of Donald Trump. Some examples of this include Sargon of AKkad, Roaming Millennial, Anthony Brain Logan, Some Other Black Guy, ShoeOnHead, Tyler Preston, Paul Joseph Watson, and my personal favorite Naked Ape. NOTE: I'm am not using these people as a monolith or as a "leader" of a "community". They are just individuals whose content I enjoy and just happen to agree with. Fourth: I did vote for Donald Trump, but I will be the first to say that he by no means was the best choice for the Leader of the Free World, but he also isn't the worst (at least in my opinion). But there are a few notable points that I would like to address. 1) You said that Trump is a racist, but I have been listening to both sides of the politics, and yet neither side has provided any evidence that would suggest that claim to be accurate. Not to mention that the majority of Black, White, Latino, Asian, etc votes went to Donald Trump and that's telling because people of various ethnicity don't vote for a racist person. 2) I can't find anything misogynistic about Trump. Even if he did say "Grab them by the pussy", that was more Trump inflating his own ego, as his is a billionaire, than it was him saying it's okay to assault women. 3) I don't think Trump has any plan to enforce any sort of religious idea to implement into America. At the RNC, Trump told the United States that he would be doing everything he could in his power to defend the LGBT community from any dangers from people who would dare harm them just because of their sexual preference. When asked what his stance was on the LGBT people allowed to marry he answered that what he thought was irrelevant because it's already now the law that they may marry. Even if I don't agree with your POLITICAL stance, I am more than happy that you said it and gave your thoughts on it. I'm not the kind of guy that would shame anybody for simply having an opinion different from mine (as said in the points above), so the most I can do is disagree. So as I said, I'm not unsubscribing and I'm going to continue watching and sharing your videos. I hope I could articulate my stance without coming across as condescending or rude. I would love to hear feedback either from you or your subscribers (but you especially)! Thank you!

[@bennyroe6667]

That opening is EPIC!

[@LotsaJunk]

"I know plants, I have the best plants. I have the best plants, but there is no better and good smelling plant than Titan Arum." - Donald Plantrump

[@LotsaJunk]

(By the way, this is basically my take on what would happen if Trump became a vegan. Or, to put it better, a plant hugger.)

[@titaniumxete97]

I'm an Atheist and a Conservative, I don't like labels but I think it's important to establish that. I was and still am in full support of Donald Trump. I'm open to debate unlike many others because i truly love debating and hearing other points of view, however many left leaning people these days (not all) are less interested in talking and more interested in name calling. As a trump supporter I've been called more things than I've even heard of. Confidence: Trump does give me confidence, as a true outsider Trump is the closest America has ever come to "anyone can be president" he has shown that the will of the people cannot be crushed by money and government, It's what inspired me to get into politics myself in all honesty. You claim Trump has made crude remarks about Women, Disabled people, Hispanics, and Muslims. That's wrong I'm afraid, I can get more in detail on it if you wish but here is the long short of it: Trump has said things about SPECIFIC women which by all means do not represent ALL women, women are not a collective they are as separate as men are from each other. Trump was not mocking a disabled guy, look it up the "disabled" guy in question was perfectly fine with just a messed up hand, that's it, he wasn't some mentally handicapped young kid with down syndrome, he was a normal guy all things considered, and Trump uses his flailing hands to mock other people like Ted Cruz (if he was really flailing his arms to imitate the "disabled" guy how would that make sense? the guys hand was solid not flailing.) Trump has said ILLEGALS are terrible people for the most part not ALL MEXICANS, big difference. And he has said nothing about Muslims I don't know where you got that from. Honesty: Trump is the most honest politician ever! He's doing everything he said he'd do (something most presidents don't do) he did not lie about crowd size, he did not lie about voter fraud we ALL know Hillary was up to some shenanigans (for instance when they recounted Wisconsin's votes Trump got MORE than the first count, now how is that possible? did some people take back they're votes?) hell you want to talk about lies? Look up Hillary Clinton. Conclusion: Look Trump isn't the second coming of Christ, he has flaws everyone does, and I do agree with you on some points but calling him Racist, Sexist, and all these other meaningless buzzwords does nothing but silence the conversation. You wonder why people don't want to discuss this issue with you while you flat out call them misled, gullible, and even hint at thinking they're generally bad people. I agree the cabinet isn't amazing, but they haven't done anything yet, don't shit on them until they've done something bad, give them a chance, give Trump a chance. Of course he has an Ego man, to be President of the US you have to have a certain level of Ego to make it that's just the truth. Trump's election proves that the american people are sick and tired of a society leaning way to far Liberal, and I have never been happier to see our country start moving back in the right direction. We shouldn't be a Liberal society, nor a conservative one, we should be Centrist as a whole and that is what our country is moving towards I believe. Trump is nothing like what you think he is, you back the media even though the media is nothing but Character Assassination and Liberal Propagandists these days, not real news. If you want to debate I'm all open for discussion. But if you keep calling me and people like me gullible, stupid, and hateful I'm afraid I cant discuss anything with you. Thank you for reading.

[@TheAmericanPrometheus]

Problem with anti-Trumpers is that they have a bad habit of slandering and smearing the opposition by labeling them every "ist" in the book. Then when the opposition voices their rebuttals he quickly takes the small amount of haters and uses them to say "Trump supporters are triggered" and "not even willing to discuss".

[@titaniumxete97]

Yes. I'd love to have a debate with these people but not if I'm just going to get called names and have all my points ignored.

[@MrMac5150]

I Love Trump, and I believe he will clean the swamp. God Bless you Trump.

[@antonk23148]

MrMac5150 he is clearly not fit to be a president

[@levijaeger1181]

Sorry, I agree, but no gods on this channel please.

[@therianet]

+Levi Jaeger all poweful Kek will punish you heathens and his smug prophet Pepe will shit in you mouth

[@roebuckpayne]

MrMac5150 he made a Goldman Sachs executive Treasury Secretary......how is that cleaning the swamp?

[@antonlanthier5122]

Levi Jaeger Please don't attempt censorship on this channel, or anywhere else. 👌

[@jazzie634]

You're voice is unexplainably amazing and soothing.

[@fitnessoni7881]

What does being a vegan has to do with politics?

[@gailisaacs2]

FitnessNerd animal welfare and agriculture + environmental vegans.

[@fitnessoni7881]

Gail Isaacs Okay, that makes sense. Thanks

[@antonk23148]

FitnessNerd he says in the beginning that the viewers wanted a video about politics and that's why he made this video

[@haydencooper9095]

why wouldn't it have anything to with politics? veganism isn't just about health

[@zidneya]

I think he was referring to himself. His official youtube account is vegan atheist after all.

[@jasonalbano5052]

Completely agree. Wouldn't mind more political videos.

[@Lucrecious]

You should put the voting link in the description so I just click it, my man.

[@Altcapball]

Calling someone stupid isn't an argument.

[@BaconMaken]

I thought Gary Johnson was the best choice. Believed in personal freedom, fiscal responsibility, and he was a successful governor of New Mexico. But unfortunately, he didn't know the name of a Syrian city. So we have a liar with no political experience instead.

[@NoExitLoveNow]

Trump is a vile person and not at all a reasonable choice for President. That said, I think that you should limit to your political commentary to specific vegan/anti-vegan and anti-atheist policies.

[@Andrew-re8by]

This video is GOLD

[@davidevans7477]

I am atheist. I voted for Trump. Having him in office would make a lot of people start questioning everything. He also is at least claiming to be against tolerating undocumented immigration. We barely take care of our own people, balance is needed, even if from a very questionable person.

[@K0ragg]

I'd suggest you do a video on the actual nice and well thought of responses and answering their points of view and things they said. Would probably be more constructive, albeit it would take longer. I found quite a few of those comments, most are prolly a tad too long but you could make it work.

[@terryzdallas]

You have to understand that 1/2 of your viewers like trump. I unsubscribe. Bye

[@DocStrange0123]

If you like someones content but you find out in one video that you and that someone don't agree in just one tiny topic and that's the reason to unsub, well, it's your choice but isn't that a bit childish? Oh you said something I don't like about someone I like I'm not gonna play with you anymore...

[@izzyira]

Big reason why a lot of Trump supporters might be annoyed by this video is because you give no arguments, just assertions. That's fine if the debate continues so we can refine both perspectives, but if the debate ends with the video, then it's pointless.

[@mattzilla331]

everyone loves democracy until their candidate loses

[@BlueDirt_ProAggressive]

sir, that opener was hilarious! sorry u had to listen to him that much to get all those clips.

[@VeganTruth]

rakland187 thanks. that took so much time and I had to go through so much footage.

[@JacquesDSilva]

I'm still trying to figure out how I feel about the people who voted for Trump. . .

[@0x0x00]

I disagreed with your points ...

[@joolstyler9718]

Saw Trudeau for the first time yesterday, 😂

[@FernandoTorres-bd7im]

PRAISE KEK

[@cloejarozenski3097]

Once Bernie was out of the race, I didn't give a crap. If you're going to flush the country down the toilet, you may as well flush it down with a cherry bomb. Donald Trump is that cherry bomb.

[@georgejohnson1144]

Canada in 30 years will just like France or Belgium 🇧🇪

[@antonk23148]

Lnay Niang ??

[@egosaber651]

but trump has meme magic and you cant beat meme magic

[@ilap381]

So happy you are back!

[@dieforme8522]

im So Proud of President Trump i love TRUMP

[@adrianharris1592]

I like how all these people just didn't even listen to the points this man made lol

[@r.hiramhouck3498]

While I don't agree with your political viewpoint, I do respect the way you presented your case. Many Donald Trump critics have spoken from an emotional standpoint. You did so yourself but at least admitted that you were doing so. I appreciate your concern though about our economy. In my opinion, the two previous presidencies have been dismal failures and both have contributed to the future financial collapse of the American economy. I use the word "American" instead of "US" because our financial collapse will certainly affect Canada and Mexico as well as the nations of Central and South America. You should note that many of the criticisms of Trump you presented could easily be applied to Obama and Bush, Jr. as well. If you look at a graph of our national debt over time, the debt remained steady during the Clinton administration but drastically increased by the end of the Bush presidency. Sadly the slope of the line (I hope you know algebra) increased even more during the Obama administration. While Barack Obama presents himself well and is quite the diplomat when it comes to political correctness, his policies and programs and put this nation into further debt to the point of no return. My hope is that someday we will have as much debt as China, which has none. For that to happen the next eight terms of presidents have to make continual cuts for us to get to the level of China. As a Trump voter and supporter, I have cringed when he made inappropriate comments during his campaign and even while as president. I will also stipulate that Obama was much more "presidential" However, I believe that Trump can lead us on a path toward debt freedom than Obama would have. You should not be concerned about how a president acts or what he says compared to whether or not we can be saved from financial collapse. On a side note, just because one Trump supporter throws a tantrum does not mean we are all like that. You wrote a week ago: "Seems like Trump supporters here are very easily triggered and not even willing to discuss. I find it interesting how easily a person can unsubscribe from a channel, when they are confronted with someone who holds a different view on 1 topic. Interesting. I will have to look into this comment section and maybe start a new series... Stupid Trump Supporters Comments?" Please check your prejudice or maybe someone might start a series like "Stupid Vegan Atheist Comments." One last question though, you criticized Trump's comments about Muslims even though you are an atheist. I would think that you would support his negative comments about a religion that believes and practices many concepts that you are or should be vehemently opposed to as a vegan atheist or anyone else would who believes in common decency. While you may think all religion is farcical and ridiculous, you should at least acknowledge Islam as one of the worst.

[@Jaeger320]

In my eyes this election was lost before the president was even voted. I can't support the idea of voting 'the lesser evil' so both Trump an Hillary would have been no option even if that means that my vote wouldn't have changed anything. Yet this election managed to divide the country like i never could have imagined. Both sides call each other names instead of working out their differences as it is evident in the comments and I believe that this could really cripple america.

[@personalperson5095]

Trumps ego is constructive. It will be good for the country. The swamp needs to be drained first though. I'm a fairly consistent vegan cause I'm not heartless, and a conservative/libertarian cause its dangerous to allow progressive feelings to drive policy.

[@greenbannanna123]

I find videos slamming both of the 2016 candidates humorous. I don't really care for either.

[@The9gods]

I only spoke to one trump supporter at length and that was my father who I rarely speak with. He admitted the reason he vote trump was emotions. He decided to vote with his emotions and from our talk he made it sound like that was a common practice among trump supporters he knew.

[@PrisonKilljoy]

It's actually how most people across the political spectrum vote.

[@texaspoontappa2088]

I MISSED YOU SO MUCH!

[@izzyira]

I'm a vegan atheist Trump supporter. Debate me.

[@thepolokid44]

A vegan Agnostic Hindu with a PhD I support President Trump.

[@brideut]

Hey TheVeganAtheist, how can I become a vegetarian without messing up my iron levels? That problem has happened to me more than once, and I would appreciate your advice.

[@VeganTruth]

Do you have an issue getting enough iron or too much?

[@brideut]

TheVeganAtheist I think I have an issue with it dropping easily. One time, I couldn't donate blood because of my problem.

[@luismedeiros7139]

You just triggered the Deplorable Snow Flakes :D

[@levijaeger1181]

I don't see anyone claiming to have been offended. In fact, there are several calm and reasonable responses. I think you're projecting.

[@NyxTheBraix]

I love to see you back!

[@mlm_academyofficial2041]

racism, misoginy? Where has he said that one race is superior to a nother? Where did he say that he hated women?

[@davidyoung3833]

your opinion doesn't matter

[@IagoMotaVFX]

It does if it's justified.

[@davidyoung3833]

Iago Mota everything he said this video was untrue

[@haydencooper9095]

David Young no it wasn't...

[@davidyoung3833]

Hayden Cooper V you people are sheep

[@IagoMotaVFX]

David Young "Someone disagreed with me!! I'll just call him a sheep, because reasons!!" ʇuǝɯnƃɹɐ ƃuᴉɔuᴉʌuoɔ ɐ ɥɔns

[@spaceghost1388]

Hillary definitely wasnt a better choice. To me, its like picking which poison to ingest. I voted 3rd party, Jill Stein to be specific. And no, i dont agree with everything she dishes out (about 60%), but to me it was about not voting for corruption or idiocy. I wish more Americans would vote 3rd party.

[@NathanaelDuke]

I'm both vegan and an atheist, and I'm not a Trump fan, but I can take a crack at this: Trump is an unashamed, uncomplicated, and vocal figure who, despite his wealth, took it upon himself to speak aloud the thoughts and grievances of the forgotten working poor and middle-American middle class. Whether he can or will do anything to help those of us in those groups improve our situation was completely irrelevant to the voters who selected him, since the other side made it clear that they had no intention whatsoever of fighting for them and addressing their problems. Add to that the fact that the opposition worked vigorously to silence their populist candidate, it's hardly a mystery why nine percent of registered Democrats voted for the only populist left standing by the end of 2016. All in all, was a good year to be a lifelong third-party voter. Have never cast a vote for a Democrat or Republican in a federal election, and at this rate, I might not have to to make a difference.

[@marzbarz5293]

he is a master of psychology. Whether you realize it or not he has mastered the system.

[@SangoProductions213]

He was elected for the same reason why every other president is elected: the other side is seen as much worse, and the other side didn't see their side as good enough to give a fuck. Let me lead off with: I think there definitely could be better presidents....in theory. I liked Bernie Sanders, and I like to say I associate myself with the Green Party. Now, even though I think Trump is a dumbass for being a climate denier, and (possibly) supporting creationism, you've got to admire something about him: He is earnest, hardworking, and transparent, all things completely - *completely* - atypical of any president in recent history. You know all the campaign promises that Obama said he'd do? And how all of...2 were done over 8 years? In a month or 2 of Trump being president, there've been how many executive orders in line with his promises? He doesn't hide behind PR people. He talks directly to them. If he doesn't like something, he's not going to go "hmm. Will this make me not get elected again?" He just says it. He doesn't pander. Trump sold a vision of the future of making "America great again", as the meme goes. Compared to the other side, who's vision was "hey, you get a literal pussy in office, and I'm not Trump! Vote me!"...yeah. Don't forget that many Americans are Ameri-centric, in large part. America being "great" is....great for anyone who thinks he can do it. Your remarks about him saying petty/crass/etc remarks about women/etc (and claims of racism/sexism) ...makes me think you are probably informed by the mainstream media who've been fighting against Trump in the same way they most recently fought against PewDiePie. Oh, btw. Did you know PDP is a nazi now?

[@Loronus]

nice to watch someone on the other side on the issue trump. Got some new perspective out of this. thx

[@padraicloingsigh421]

he lost the popular vote, the electoral college appointed him.

[@missyc86]

I am a vegan atheist latina conservative and if I lived in the USA I would have voted for Trump. I don't agree with everything he says (esp in terms of economy) but I wish him and americans the best. Hope you can soon overcome the terrible social divisions created in the past years by liberals and the media.

[@missyc86]

You describe Trump as "a self centered capitalist, not one who works for the benefits of society". Capitalism is the system that helps society the most, the one that creates the most richness, the ones who makes the poor less poor, and yes, it is driven by selfishness and self interest, but what's wrong with that? A businessman creating companies and doing transactions with others creates jobs and generates value, which helps people way more than any dirty communist blabbing about common ownership and surplus value.

[@neotericphoenix5811]

I fucking love Canadians

[@Roamingraven37]

there is a lot of fake news about him. most of the things said about him has been debunked. I didn't like him till I did research myself and learned he's a really good person

[@GRBtutorials]

Could you please post evidence of your claim?

[@roebuckpayne]

Don't forget, Trump being better than Hillary Clinton, which I agree with because of TPP, doesn't automatically make him good. We are going to have fallout from his economic deregulation and based on his cabinet picks, no decrease in corruption. Don't play Red Vs. Blue people, look at each issue and give a logical reason Trump's policy on it is good *Remember* -we aren't arguing that the policy positions are 'better than BLANK's'....we are arguing whether or not they are good. Be critical thinkers always, don't just pick A side

[@Baelish-fx7ew]

oh yes and trump is soooooo unqualified... compaired with your substitute drama teacher and part time ski instructor who ponces about publicly wearing various cultural dresses.

[@Peasham]

To objectively say that either president would be better or worse, is flat out stupid. Facts on both candidates being shit was widespread, it was incredibly subjective, who'd be worse.

[@ilanbens1]

do you know I don't care about all of these chararteristics ?because for whatever reasons people voted him into office and that's all that matters

[@TheTurbanatore]

I am a Sikh and I support Trump. Lets just hope he doesn't deport me...

[@saranoel6622]

I am all about political disagreements and hearing opposing opinions but don’t just regurgitate the same accusations and claims spewed out by the main stream media… pretty weak video

[@genesisbustamante-durian]

I think you are forgetting that the other option was worse.

[@alan62036]

How would a voter being vegan affect their decision?

[@jacobrh1]

A leader that's not afraid to hurt people's feelings is why an atheist supports Trump

[@GRIMGORIRONHIDEROCKS]

MORRRRRE vids on politics plox!

[@hanicegutierrez9829]

I can't believe there are so many thumbs down!! Scary world we live in! Your channel and Unnatural Vegan's channel are the best! :) so glad you guys have been putting out a lot of videos lately. Please keep it up!

[@Marxist-Chillest]

Coming from a fellow leftie, It's hard to name any other leftie I've heard give a respectable criticism of Trump that wasn't full of it's own lies and cancer.

[@tabularasa0606]

He'll have a nervous breakdown soon enough. He's already showing signs.

[@Lavarusity]

your first and last video on the Donald please Im Vegan, Atheist, my grandmother is mexican, and I support Trump

[@XxpurplezombiexX]

I'm a vegan athirst college student who has forced myself to accept Trump as president. Rather than whining and bitching about the president of the United States, thus putting my self in a shitty mindset, I look at the presidency in a positive mindset just so I don't get depressed and letting it effect my grades xD.

[@colchadom]

I'm a Hispanic vegan atheist who voted for Trump. I thought you were opened minded and questioned everything that is being spewed but sounds like you have only heard one side or just care for one side of a political spectrum. You sound like you have been spoon fed by the liberal media.

[@garybrocklehurst6784]

who's next President Sharon Osbourne?

[@sayuas4293]

The alternative was worse. Can't stand her.

[@Nothin2seehere-e4z]

Trump>Pence and I dislike President Trump.

[@ProperComment]

I'm a non-believer, a vegetarian, but I somehow feel, US had no good choice for Presidential run 2016. It's just that Trump was less harmful of the 2. Can't go into details, but hope you might get the point. TBH, it's a fact (harsh fact) to accept Trump as President and try to get the most out of it. There's nothing much anyone can do about it. IMPEACHMENT !!!!

[@lobete]

Was Hillary a great pick for the Democrats? Hell no. But she was still an adult that knew how to actually do the job and someone who could act outside of egotistical needs. I think Sam Harris said it best: *"I say this is someone who understands everyone's reservations about Clinton, but one thing you can't say about her is that she is not qualified or that she is profoundly ignorant of how the world works or that she's unintelligent. These are these are not things you can say about her no matter how much you hate her personally"*

[@DylanLenn]

Anyone else notice that trump supporters will often criticize mainstream media as unreliable "fake news" but then goes on to cite it whenever they say something they like?

[@LokiWolfe1985]

Me at the voting booth: "Non-political billionare who many people take for an idiot, or a known criminal who doesn't care if she incites world war III?" There were many other considerations, but for me that is what it ultimately boiled down to. I may be a skeptic but I would rather vote for a Christian man, as opposed to a feminist and criminal warmonger who wants our planet to be her own little personal chessboard.

[@chrisrj9871]

Yet in 2020 before the plague, he very nearly started WW3 anyway when he assassinated Qassim Soleimani.

[@jamjam4065]

Hey, guys I'm a creationist and I know this is not a "stupid Christian" comments video but I just wanted to share my thoughts about evolution. This is what I think about evolution and some of the many evidence I have against it. I don't intend to offend anyone just sharing my thoughts. Much love and god bless: Jam 1. Lack of intermediate species If the creatures today evolved from other kinds of creatures we would expect to find in the fossil record there intermediate or transitional forms there should be lots of examples of this instead we find fully formed fossils with a few debateable transitional fossils this is a real problem for evolution Darwin said "why is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this is the most obvious and serious objection which can be urged against this theory." (origins of species page 413) Fully formed organisms appear abruptly in the fossil record for example the first bats and birds are indeed fully fleged flyers more over the oldest know turtle in the fossil record is fully formed we have no intermediates between turtles and cadalasaurs which are the organisums evolutionists claim turtles came from and the "imperfection of the fossil record excuse will not work because organisums like trutles leave excellent fossils but still show no intermediates this is because evolution is a delution. the imperfect fossil record excuse will still not work because a biochemist Michael denten in his book called evolution a theory in crisis says 97.7 % of living orders of land vertebrates are fossilized including 79.1% of living familys of land vertebrates are represented as fossils 87.8 excluding birds. Infact all 32 mammal orders apear abruptly and fully formed so the idea the fossil record is incomplete is false. 2. The Cambrian explosion The Cambrian explosion is a good refutation of evolution aswell. the word Cambrian refers to early period of geological history. Scientist Stephen Meyer Notes: "during this geological period many new and anatomically sophisticated creatures appeared suddenly in the sedimentary layers of the geologic column without any evidence of simpler ancestral forms in the earlier layers below" (Darwins doubt page 7) If evolution is true and these creatures in the Cambrian evolved from simpler forms the earlyer layers below should contain such forms but they do not this is a serious problem for evolution. Another aspect of the Cambrian explosion is brought up by John d moris "the Cambrian explosion constitutes a major episode in the history of life. If evolution were true, one would expect the record to start with one type of animal life then increase to two and so on. Yet fossil studies have shown that essentially all phyla were present at the start each distinct from the others and each fully equipped to function and survive." "Even vertebrate fish were present in the lower Cambrian......there is no evolutionary tree found in the fossils as Darwin and his disciples have claimed. Rather it is more like a lawn than a tree." (the real nature of the fossil record in creation page 228) 3. The chance of abiogenesis (evolution) Zoologist and physiologist G A Kurkut defined abiogenesis as: "the theory that all living forms in the world have arisen from a single source which itself came from an inorganic form" The idea of abiogenesis states that ammonia carbon dioxide water and other gases at the time of the early earth were jump started either by lightning or radiation which acted as an energy source to somehow form the first singal celled organism life from non life a cell contains among other things proteins which are formed by amino acids however sicentist Stephen Meyer calculated if one factors in the need for proper bonding and homocurality. "The probability of constructing a rather short functional protein at random becomes so small (1 chance in 10 to the power of 125) as to approach the universal probability bound of 1 chance in 10 to the power of 150, the point at which appeals to chance becomes absurd given the probabilistic resources of the entire universe." (evidence for design in physics and biology. Page 75) More over he calculated that to generate a single fuctional protein of 150 amino acids exceeds 1 chance in 10 to the power of 180. Stephen notes "it is extremely unlikely that a random search through all the possible amino a sequences could generate even a single relatively short functional protein in the time available since the beginning of the universe" 4. Helium in the atmosphere. Helium in the sun is generally believed to be formed by nuclear fusion. This is where nuclei of hydrogen, the lightest element, combine to form helium with huge amounts of energy released. On earth, it is produced mainly by radioactive alpha (a)-decay. The great New Zealand physicist Ernest Rutherford (1871-1937) discovered that a-particles were really the nuclei of helium atoms. Radioactive elements in rocks-like uranium and thorium-produce helium this way, and it leaks out into the air. Scientists can work out how fast helium is forming, how fast it escapes from rocks, how much enters the air, and how much can escape from the air into space. They can also measure the amount of helium in rocks and in the air. From this, they can calculate the maximum age of rocks and of the air. The results are puzzling to those who believe in billions of years. Of course, all such calculations depend on assumptions about the past, like the starting conditions and constant rates of processes. They can never prove the age of something. For that, we need an eye-witness (cf. Job 38:4). Helium in the atmosphere  Air is mainly nitrogen (78.1%) and oxygen (20.1%). There is much less helium (0.0005%). But this is still a lot of helium-3.71 billion tonnes. However, since 67 grams of helium escape from the earth’s crust into the atmosphere every second, it would have taken about two million years for the current amount of helium to build up, even if there had been none at the beginning. Evolutionists believe the earth is over 2,500 times older-4.5 billion years. Of course, the earth could have been created with most of the helium already there, so two million years is a maximum age. (It could easily be much younger, such as 6,000 years in age.) Also, the rate of helium buildup would be slower now than in the past, because the radioactive sources have decayed. This would put an even lower upper limit on the age of the earth. The only way around this problem is to assume that the helium is escaping into space. But for this to happen, the helium atoms must be moving fast enough to escape the earth’s gravity (i.e., above the escape velocity). Collisions between atoms slow them down, but above a critical height (the exobase) of about 500 kilometres (300 miles) above the earth, collisions are very rare. Atoms crossing this height have a chance of escaping if they are moving fast enough-at least 10.75 kilometres per second (24,200 miles per hour).3 Note that although helium in a balloon will float, helium when unenclosed will just mix evenly with all the other gases, as per normal gas behaviour. The average speed of atoms can be calculated if we know the temperature, since this is related to the average energy of the atoms or molecules. The great physicist (and creationist) James Clerk Maxwell4 calculated how many gas atoms (or molecules) would have a given speed for any temperature and mass.5 Thus we can calculate how many atoms would cross the exobase fast enough to escape into space. The exobase is very hot. But even if we assume a temperature of 1500 K (1227°C or 2241°F), higher than the average, the most common speed of helium atoms is only 2.5 kilometres per second (5625 mph), or less than a quarter of the escape velocity. A very few atoms travel much faster than the average, but still the amount of helium escaping into space is only about 1/40th the amount entering the atmosphere. Other escape mechanisms are also inadequate to account for the small amount of helium in the air, about 1/2000th the amount expected after the alleged billions of years. This is an unsolved problem to the long-age atmospheric physicist C.G. Walker, who stated: ‘… there appears to be a problem with the helium budget of the atmosphere.’6 Another expert, J.W. Chamberlain, said that this helium accumulation problem ‘… will not go away, and it is unsolved.’7 The evolutionary community have been desperately looking for other explanations for the shortage, but none of them have proved adequate. A simple solution is that the earth is not nearly as old as the evolutionists think! The creationist atmospheric scientist Larry Vardiman has written a more in-depth study of this topic.8, 9 Helium in the rocks As pointed out above, most helium on earth is produced by radioactive decay in rocks. The small atoms of helium gas have no trouble escaping from the rocks into the atmosphere. The rate of entry into the atmosphere is known, as shown above. But we can also measure the rate at which helium escapes from the rocks. This process is faster in hotter rocks, and the deeper one goes into the earth, the hotter the rocks become. The creationist physicist Robert Gentry was researching deep granite as a possible way of safely storing dangerous radioactive waste from nuclear power stations. Safe storage requires that the elements should not move too fast through the rock. Granite contains mineral crystals called zircons (zirconium silicate, ZrSiO4), which often contain radioactive elements. Thus they should produce helium, which should be escaping. But Gentry found that even the deep, hot zircons (197°C or 387°F) contained far too much helium-that is, if it had had billions of years to escape. However, if there had really been only thousands of years for this helium to escape, then we shouldn’t be surprised that there is so much left.10 5. Building blocks of evolution debunked Even if we granted that the ‘building blocks’ were available, it does not follow that they could actually build anything. For example, under plausible prebiotic conditions, the tendency is for biological macromolecules to break apart into the ‘building blocks’, not the other way round.[8] Also, the ‘building blocks’ are likely to react in the wrong ways with other ‘building blocks’, for example, sugars and other carbonyl (>C=O) compounds react destructively with amino acids and other amino (-NH2) compounds, to form imines (>C=N), a common cause of browning in foods.[9] Furthermore, some of the building blocks are very unstable. A good example is ribose, which is obviously essential for RNA, and hence for the RNA-world hypothesis of the origin of life.[10] A team including the famous evolutionary origin-of-life pioneer Stanley Miller, in PNAS, found that the half life (t�) of ribose is only 44 years at pH 7.0 (neutral) and 0 °C. It’s even worse at high temperatures - 73 minutes at pH 7.0 and 100 °C.[11] This is a major hurdle for hydrothermal theories of the origin of life. Miller, in another PNAS paper, has also pointed out that the RNA bases are destroyed very quickly in water at 100 °C - adenine and guanine have half lives of about a year, uracil about 12 years, and cytosine only 19 days.[12] Most researchers avoid such hurdles with the following methodology: find a trace of compound X in a spark discharge experiment, claim ‘see, X can be produced under realistic primitive-earth conditions’. Then they obtain pure, homochiral, concentrated X from an industrial synthetic chemicals company, react it to form traces of the more complex compound Y. Typically, the process is repeated to form traces of Z from purified Y, and so on.[13] In short, the evolutionists’ simulations have an unacceptable level of intelligent interference.[14] Much of the populist evolutionary propaganda resembles the following hypothetical theory for the origin of a car: ‘Design is an unscientific explanation, so we must find a naturalistic explanation instead. Now, experiments have shown that one of the important building blocks of the car - iron - can be produced by heating naturally occurring minerals like hematite to temperatures which are found in some locations on earth. What’s more, iron can be shown to form thin sheets under pressures which are known to occur in certain geological formations. … ’ If this seems far-fetched, then note that even the simplest self-reproducing cell, which has 482 genes,[15] has a vastly higher information content than a car, yet self-reproduction is a pre-requisite for Neo-Darwinian evolution. Essential Building Block Missing - Cytosine The evolutionary biochemist, Robert Shapiro, published a detailed study of the ‘prebiotic’ synthesis of cytosine in the Proceedings of the NAS.[16] Previous studies of his had noted that neither adenine[17] nor ribose[18] were plausible prebiotic components of any self-replicating molecule, but the problems with cytosine are even worse. Together, these studies raise serious doubts about whether a prebiotic replicator with any Watson-Crick base pairing could have arisen abiotically. Shapiro noted that not the slightest trace of cytosine has been produced in gas discharge experiments, and nor has it been found in meteorites. Thus, he notes, either it is extremely hard to synthesise, or it breaks down before detection. So ‘prebiotic’ productions of cytosine have always been indirect, and involve the methodology alluded to above. That is, cyanoacetylene (HC�CC�N) and cyanoacetaldehyde (H3CCOC�N) have been found in some spark discharge experiments. Organic chemists have obtained pure and fairly strong solutions of each, and reacted each of them with solutions of other compounds which are allegedly likely to be found on a ‘primitive’ earth. Some cytosine is produced. This then apparently justifies experiments trying to link up pure and dry cytosine and ribose to form the nucleoside cytidine. However, these experiments have been unsuccessful (although analogous experiments with purines have produced 2 % yields of nucleosides),[19] despite a high level of investigator interference. Unavailability of Cytosine Precursors Shapiro also critiqued some of the ‘prebiotic’ cytosine productions. He pointed out that both cyanoacetylene and cyanoacetaldehyde are produced in spark discharge experiments with an unlikely methane/nitrogen (CH4/N2) mixture. The classical Miller experiment used ammonia (NH3), but NH3, H2O and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) greatly hindered cyanoacetylene and cyanoacetaldehyde formation. However, most evolutionists now believe that the primitive atmosphere was ‘probably dominated by CO2 and N2.’[20] Furthermore, cyanoacetylene and cyanoacetaldehyde would undergo side reactions with other nucleophiles rather than produce cytosine. For example, cyanoacetylene and cyanoacetaldehyde both react with the amino group, which would destroy any prebiotic amino acids. And there is one destructive molecule which is unavoidably present: water. Cyanoacetylene readily hydrolyzes to form cyanoacetaldehyde (t� = 11 days at pH 9, 30 °C),[20] although one should not count on this as a reliable source of cyanoacetaldehyde because cyanoacetylene would more likely be destroyed by other reactions.[20] And cyanoacetaldehyde, while more stable than cyanoacetylene, is still quite quickly hydrolyzed (t� = 31 years at pH 9, 30 °C).[21] The implausible production scenarios and likely rapid destruction means it is unrealistic to assume that the concentration of cyanoacetylene and cyanoacetaldehyde could remotely approach that needed to produce cytosine. Instability of Cytosine As pointed out above, cytosine is deaminated/hydrolyzed (to uracil) far too rapidly for any ‘hot’ origin-of-life scenario. But it is still very unstable at moderate temperatures - t� = 340 years at 25 °C. This shows that a cold earth origin-of-life scenario would merely alleviate, but not overcome, the decomposition problem. And a low temperature also retards synthetic reactions as well as destructive ones. On single-stranded DNA in solution, t� of an individual cytosine residue = 200 years at 37 °C, while the double helix structure provides good protection - t� = 30,000 years.[22] Such C®U mutations would be a great genetic hazard, but cells have an ingenious repair system involving a number of enzymes. It first detects the mutant U (now mismatched with G) and removes it from the DNA strand, opens the strand, inserts the correct C, and closes the strand.[22] It seems that such a repair system would be necessary from the beginning, because a hypothetical primitive cell lacking this would mutate so badly that error catastrophe would result. And the far greater instability of cytosine on single-stranded nucleic acid is yet another problem that proponents of the RNA-world must account for. Also, cytosine is readily decomposed under solar UV radiation, which requires that prebiotic synthesis should be carried out in the dark.[21] An Efficient Prebiotic Synthesis of Cytosine? This was claimed by Robertson and Miller.[23] They rightly disagreed with a previous suggested synthesis of cytosine from cyanoacetylene and cyanate (OCN-) because cyanate is rapidly hydrolyzed to CO2 and NH3. Instead, they heated 10-3 M cyanoacetaldehyde with various concentrations of urea ((NH2)2CO) in a sealed ampoule at 100 °C for five hours with 30-50 % yields of cytosine. Urea is produced in spark discharge experiments with N2, CO and H2O. However, Shapiro criticised this experiment on the grounds of the unavailability of cyanoacetaldehyde and instability of cytosine, as above. Robertson and Miller avoided the latter problem by stopping the reaction after five hours. But in a real prebiotic world, such a reaction would most likely continue with hydrolysis of cytosine. Shapiro also shows that urea is too unstable to reach the concentrations required (>0.1 M). Urea exists in equilibrium with small amounts of its isomer, ammonium cyanate, and since cyanate is hydrolysed readily, more urea must convert to maintain the equilibrium ratio (K = 1.04 x 10-4 at 60 °C).[21] Robertson and Miller’s sealed tube thus provided a further example of unacceptable investigator interference, because this prevented escape of NH3, thus unrealistically retarding cyanate and urea decomposition. In an open system, ‘half of the urea was destroyed after 5 hr at 90 °C and pH 7’,[21] and t� is estimated at 25 years at 25 °C.[21] The usual cross-reaction problem would intervene in the real world. For example, urea can react with glycine to form N-carbamoyl glycine,[21] which would remove both urea and amino acids from a primordial soup. Also, the primordial soup would be far too dilute, so Robertson and Miller propose that seawater was concentrated by evaporation in lagoons. But this would require isolation of the lagoon from fresh seawater which would dilute the lagoon, evaporation to about 10-5 of its original volume, then cytosine synthesis. However, such conditions are geologically ‘rare or non-existent’ today.[24] Concentrating mechanisms would also concentrate destructive chemicals. The conditions required for cytosine production are incompatible with those of purine production. Therefore this scenario must also include a well-timed rupture of the lagoon, releasing the contents into the sea, so both pyrimidines and purines can be incorporated into a replicator. 6. Stars in the universe debunk big bang model The Big Bang model requires the existence of Population III stars. What are Population III stars? According to the physics of the Big Bang, the only elements the Big Bang could have produced are hydrogen, helium, and possibly a trace of lithium, but no other metals. Anything atomically heavier than hydrogen and helium is considered a metal including, for example, oxygen. (Note: In this context astronomers use the term metal differently, not the way the term is used in chemistry). Therefore, the first stars of the universe could have been made only from hydrogen and helium, and these stars are known as Population III stars. The stars we observe throughout the universe today all contain metals, such as Population I stars, which are metal-rich, and Population II stars that are metal-poor. Population I stars contain approximately 2-3% metals, they are found in the spiral arms or in the disks of galaxies. Population II stars, containing only 0.1% metal content in their light spectra, are observed around a galaxy halo, in globular clusters, and in the central bulge of a galaxy. These designations became apparent from the stars' locations in the galaxy, space motion, and metal makeup. Stars produce the heavier elements by using successive stages of nuclear synthesis within their cores. According to the evolutionary theory of chemical enrichment, or how stars produce the heavier elements, those elements are spewed back into space through eruptions such as supernova explosions. In this way, later generations of stars that form are contaminated with heavier elements. Thus, according to evolutionary theory, the later that a star forms, the more metals that it ought to contain. This means that if the Big Bang model were true, somewhere in the universe we should see stars without the spectral lines produced by metals. Moreover, because Population III stars are predecessors of all the observed Population I and II stars, vast numbers of them should have been identified long ago. But no such stars have ever been discovered; even the light from the most distant galaxies have metal lines in their spectra. Population III stars are essential for the Big Bang model, yet they have not been observed. Therefore, the Big Bang is not a plausible scientific model if something the theory requires is nonexistent. Mainstream scientists who promote the Big Bang model try to refute the situation with the missing Population III stars with a "heads I win, tails you lose" argument. If evolutionary astronomers were to find a single Population III star, they would claim that proves the model, even though they need massive numbers of Population III stars to account for all that we see. Moreover, the fact that no one has found a Population III star is explained by their arguing that Population III stars must have been exceptionally massive and therefore burned up quickly. With this "must have been" explanation, the Big Bang model is confirmed in the minds of evolutionists. So how can they lose? The evidence will be made to fit evolutionist theory whatever the evidence may be. While evolutionary astronomers will admit that the Population III stars are missing, they engage in special pleading to deal with the fact that Population III stars have never been found. How convenient: all the Population III stars are so massive that they burn up and disappear before even one can be detected. In other words, how can anyone say Population III stars are super massive if no one has seen one to know? Big Bang proponents need to be reminded that science is based on testable evidence, not hypothetical conjecture! If no evidence exits for Population III stars, postulating any reason for their non-existence is unscientific. Their reasoning is contradictory to what we see in the universe, because over 90% of observable stars are LOW MASS! Do astronomers have a "testable mechanism" for why the universe would exhibit this sudden change? In other words, we have another just-so story: the alleged cosmic explosion makes all the first stars "super massive" to the extent that they burn up quickly (therefore no one can find any of them), and then the universe gives rise to small, dwarf type stars, such as our sun, which comprise the vast majority of all stars. In addition, when we gaze across the universe, looking back in time close to when the Big Bang supposedly occurred, the light which we see exhibits metal spectra! Here, we should at least find some light that would be free of metal spectra; but alas, metals were apparently present at the beginning of time. And when all else fails, we are now being told that Population II stars are polluted Population III stars, but what testable, provable mechanism can be found to show how this would happen? Unfortunately, the proponents of the Big Bang accept by faith the essential requirements of their theory in spite of the observations, which clearly do not fit the model. 

[@clarahav]

Well I am vegan and an atheist - still prefered Trump though.

[@biostemm]

Trump is a bafoon. Hillary is/was a villain, so the choice was pretty obvious to me. My faith in humanity has been dwindling, and I can only hold onto what little optimism I have left, that people will "wake up" and do what's right. For me, getting your own house in order is the first priority - for us in the US, this means addressing our own poor, crime, and un/under educated, before letting in and providing for tons of people with vastly different cultures. With regard to Trump' various lies and gaffes, I recommend you cite some sources, lest you be accused of making unsubstantiated claims. For instance, the only requirement for being president is being over 35 years of age and being a born US citizen; If the recent riots have shown us anything, it's that those with a political or social science degree are not necessarily the best suited to holding office. I'd also suggest you look back at who was funding HRC vs who was funding Trump - for instance, millions from a sexist, homophobic, xenophobic Saudi Arabia...

[@Slaytz13]

I couldn't agree with you more brother.

[@ChalKhutiKothig]

Don't be nasty. Give honest criticism. Don't Swear. Please :-)

[@mikeyvester]

I am a Canadian too.

[@thedemonhater7748]

Oh please dude, don't tell me you actually think he's racist. He may have done some things in the 70's that may have been… questionable. But besides that, he's not racist.

[@dextervirus]

Insulting Trump voters is not the right way to make a point. Unsubscribed.

[@scottanderson3473]

I'm a fan of yours but to hear you make fun of trump is a bit much for me why criticize do you not consider that any of your fans are Republicans I am an atheist and hate the meat industy and am trying to make the switch and I voted trump for economic and foreign policy reasons

[@Talon323]

also hillory is seen as a corrupt elitist, and peapole hated her more. the ellection was a competicion of who gets less hate.

[@YouTubeWorldwideinternet]

keep it aboot veganism and atheism, OK buddy? Aye, Our politics is not your Canadian ass business.

[@VeganTruth]

Definitely is my business. Rewatch the beginning of the video for a refresher.

[@YouTubeWorldwideinternet]

You asked for a comment to make my view known, so there you go, aye.

[@torguy5763]

You're dumb as bricks lol

[@YouTubeWorldwideinternet]

Stop talking to yourself