integrate sec^3x

[@christophergame7977]

I particularly like how you write the variable 'x'.

[@PrimeNewtons]

I guess it makes it easy to find 'x'

[@christophergame7977]

@@PrimeNewtons Yes, you don't even need to solve the equation for x; you can just find it right there on the page !!! It also makes it easier to know that the symbol isn't the multiplication sign × .

[@mreverything7056]

This is one of the first examples my professor showed me when introducing me to IBP with trig functions. Mind blowing when you realize you can just split the weird power of a trig function into a familiar power of a trig function

[@Orillians]

Can you make a list/playlist of all integrals you should memorize?

[@J.B.L2227]

Holy shit why did you change your pfp? 😭

[@josephbenson606]

? Bruh

[@cesarmiranda2205]

Very nice, I really appreciate Thanks from Brazil

[@paraskumar9850]

this question came in my maths exam today

[@jhawarnikunj]

Same bhai 😭 sahi hua kya ??

[@JSSTyger]

Which means you got the question wrong :D

[@jhawarnikunj]

@@JSSTyger bhai mera method thoda different hai

[@jhawarnikunj]

@@JSSTyger what I did is sec*2 was different and I converted secx into root(1+tan*2) so mera last answer aaya log sex+tanx

[@paraskumar9850]

@@jhawarnikunj ha bhai sahi krke aya hun same method

[@josegregoriopremerlfernand8270]

Profesor quero decirle que he aprendido mucho con sus videos y quiero darle las gracios

[@lornacy]

Your channel is like Rock Star math 😂 Thank you for your explanations and enthusiasm.

[@dougaugustine4075]

Best presenter I've ever seen.

[@joserubenalcarazmorinigo9540]

Muy bueno los pasos y la explicación para resolver esta Integral. Pero en 8:00 para encontrar la Integral de sec x multiplicó Numerador y Denominador por la expresión sec x + tg x y muchos quedan impresionados por ello. No es ningún artificio,. Es más bien una trampa o un truco. Porque para saber porqué se debe multiplicar por esa expresión y no otra, se aprovecha el CONOCIMIENTO del RESULTADO de la Integral que es: ln (sec x + tg x) y como se sabe que la Derivada de Logaritmo NEPERIANO es 1/x, entonces necesitamos que sec x + tg x tengamos en el Denominador No es la Octava Maravilla Lo correcto es utlizar por ejemplo la Sustitución Trigonométrica Universal. También existe otros caminos, pero sin usar RESULTADO CONOCIDO

[@nicolasguguen5918]

9:36 you forgot to put dx in the expression of du. But super clear explanation thank you!

[@raymondseligman7003]

Again: as a culinary food expert where did you get your math expertise? Do you teach somewhere?

[@abdullahford4169]

Well explained great videos. I would like to know the name of your introductory music. thank you

[@PrimeNewtons]

Thank you. I went to the studio @kayomusiq to have it made. So, there is no name for the music yet.

[@abdullahford4169]

Thank you for your very quick reply.

[@enimsajjaja2163]

why can't we use transformation of sec^2x to (1+tan^2x)?

[@PrimeNewtons]

Try it

[@spaceecks1793]

i like the part where you wrote sex. as a high school student that part particularly appeals to me :D

[@PrimeNewtons]

Bad student

[@EdenPhiri-hk9oy]

Very helpful

[@princechandpa2944]

Hi

[@Murtadha_hassan]

Thanks

[@stigastondogg730]

Please tell us, what is the derivative of sex????!?? 😂😂😂😂😂

[@Truth83rtz]

A child

[@shshshshsh7612]

​@@stigastondogg730 a child

[@Mini_Wolf.]

A kiss, cause it's what's come before, cannot be a child because if you integrate a child you get an adult

[@chiwoochi2834]

Good.