Prince Harry & Meghan being ERASED?

[@blackbeltsecrets]

UPDATE: ALL of the information is now loading from the left menus which were not when I recorded the video. Still odd that it has been moved, but perhaps just to tidy it up? 🤔

[@fairyprincess911]

What do you mean?

[@blackbeltsecrets]

@@fairyprincess911 the information on archive .org now shows up by clicking those links to the left, whereas they just moved the page down earlier today. Perhaps because I had archive.org open at the same time, just very odd.

[@robertlavigne6560]

To my friend across the pond. You have nothing to apologize for. There are wicked people everywhere, and some of these individuals are just plain jealous. I, for one, really enjoy your content especially this channel. It actually seems more informal here, more like a group of friends having a good time. Thanks for everything you do, Debbie Lavigne 😊

[@wolfgoddess7300]

Do not apologize! You are doing a fine job !!!!❤

[@picilocarnal]

@@robertlavigne6560I second that. I love listening to these videos when I’m at home relaxing from a hard day’s work. Nice to listen to reasonable people.

[@lizhorton5333]

I think the removal of HRH is significant but removing information about Meghan is a direct move to show that she is not significant and to reflect how the UK public and Royal family feel. They “never complain and never explain”, but their actions speak louder than words. Glad to see this bold move. I’m an American and she deserves no recognition, in my opinion.

[@valentinarodoracio8145]

I agree! Fellow 🇺🇸

[@dgreatti]

IMO the change most likely influenced by how disingenuous she has proven herself to be. Still cannot believe H's profile is so detailed given the venom he's been spewing about his family, the Firm etc... don't get it.

[@fairyprincess911]

I never doubted this would come to pass and more will come. To everyone who doubted King Charles’ fealty to throne and country: 😹

[@scratchy1704]

Yep 👌,small steps 🇬🇧

[@daisyjayne4957]

Agreed!

[@tharris114]

THE ADULTS IN THE ROOM UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS CHANNEL IS ABOUT. NO EXPLANATION NEEDED!🤩🤩🤩

[@Annie-yv7rc]

Well said

[@lillyroth61]

Definitely!

[@lillyroth61]

When did we all become so literal, and so sensitive that any opinion we might not agree with has suddenly become an expression of “hate” instead of just a different opinion?

[@angelchambers8510]

My guess (and it is just a guess) is that Meghan's history of telling porkies has led to her page being shortened to only verifiable information. Her education & career backgrounds have varied with each telling and the Royals are, most likely, trying to avoid being dragged into any further entanglements with the couple.

[@CplArvinBethe]

Right, I’m surprised he didn’t say that as a possibility.

[@MsLouisVee]

Even her education is now being questioned regarding her college. That is, it’s questionable whether she graduated.

[@ladydove5895]

@angelchambers8520, that's an intelligent guess😊.

[@wahidaguitoun5324]

@@MsLouisVee Meghan est très diplômées et à travaillé à l'ambassade d'Argentine et n'avait pas peur de s'exprimer avec l'ONU qui était leur embassadrisse dans l'humanitaire et les œuvres caritatives , arrêtez d'écouter des ragots inventés pour pousser à la haine 😢😢

[@eddiegaltek]

Maybe they are deleting any "Fact" that Meghan herself has contradicted. Pretty soon it will just say, "Meghan Markel, American Actress."

[@cakehole53]

About time. Pity they can't be removed from the line of succession.

[@patdixon-lj7qs]

King Charles need to take him and his invisible kids out of LOS too and banned them from the UK too since meghan is jealous of Princess Catherine and children and will do them harm since she want the crown

[@Maryanne-tt8jn]

They’re on notice

[@juliemayes2027]

They should be because meggaliar’s followers are psychopathies and very very dangerous and if they thought their goddess could become Queen they are crazy enough to try something to make it so THAT is why Harry should be taken out of line is succession

[@cybersal7]

Removing the LOS is way more important than any titles. After all Megan will use whatever title she darn will pleases. Her sugars already call her princess Megan in the US.

[@tsbonner]

Exactly!

[@notbill08]

Why has almost all of Meghan's bio been removed? Because most of it's false! I think these website changes are long overdue. I can't believe the Harkles still have pages on the Royal website at all?

[@Deb-vu7gk]

Me neither

[@renekirebornrenekireborn4777]

If you read Tom Bower's book, you'd probably understand why they had to remove all that information. So many inconsistencies in her life story, especially leading up to Harry, according to Revenge, by Tom Bower.

[@Maryanne-tt8jn]

MM has never sued TB or denied anything he has written about her

[@jennideans]

Agree ...her life history is very dark and suspicious, because of her lies, taking it out of the official website was the most honest way they could record it ...by not recording it

[@kristend344]

@@Maryanne-tt8jn He's a lawyer - he will have meticulous documentation, so he has proof of what he says.

[@user-xs9fp3ic9y]

She has never challenged anything in Tom Bowers book. From a woman who has sued more people than we can count. No denial. Tom gives a very good account and insight into her life before Harry. Especially the fact that she never worked for the UN. Her first marriage to Joe Giuliano before her marriage to Trevor Engelson. If it wasn’t true then why hasn’t she sued him.

[@EllieD.Violet]

Spot on. Nobody can keep up with her ever changing stories and 'alternative facts' 😂. The only solution is to keep most basic information that can be checked by consulting public records.

[@fromsouthbrasil]

I noticed the same thing yesterday. I saw that the space for Harry and Meghan was reduced compared to the other members of the RF. And I think that's fair and right. They are no longer active members, to be fair they never really were. What options does RF have? No one wants to be associated with them, they live on another continent and have failed at everything they've laid their hands on.

[@rebeccalucysmith9689]

I think the removal of Meghans stuff is down the the fact that the Royal family do not want to support what’s more or less the equivalent of a very embellished CV

[@Gunman2461]

I think they've reduced her bio and therefore made it more accurate in representation. The archived version makes it look like she's very active, whereas in reality she isn't. Also, previous comments have pointed out that her recollections of her own life vary greatly to others recollections of her. I think it's a smart move to remove all the floweriness and just show the limited role she actually had with her short time in the royal family.

[@Thunderbird68-i2f]

Well said.

[@Romovictorio]

Thank you for your coverage of this developing, evolving narrative. Your views are always reasonable & articulate👍

[@anthonyw6367]

Agreed! 💯

[@christinewhite3065]

Great coverage and I love your views.

[@ravenbrown7053]

As an American- I have not seen any evidence of M actually contributing in those areas- there have also been multiple documented "expansions" of "truth" - perhaps it is just a note of caution - I had never heard of M prior to her involvement with H - and have not seen anything over the past several years that impresses me- i do wish them both every happiness- i just don't see the actual "work" from them that I see from the Royal Family in the UK

[@KeiPalace]

her charity is performative, drop in, take a selfie, place some flowers, hand over tote bags and 300$ cash and move on, with the recent anti bullying cyber effort, Archewell were one of 14 charities that donated 2 million between them, HM focus on themselves making it appear they donated all the money, meanwhile, no mention of how much they did contribute, on to the next grift.

[@pieraonofri1606]

That’s because they haven’t done anything and whatever they tried to do, flopped!

[@barbaraallen435]

Free speech often offends and to have a difference of opinion isn't hate .

[@rileyperkins2724]

@@KeiPalace Don't forget her favorite: a 'surprise' visit.

[@rileyperkins2724]

@@barbaraallen435 I'm British, but I find the Camera Hog's antics at Uvalde offensive beyond description.

[@pieraonofri1606]

The current page is so much shorter than the archives probably because all her lies have been exposed and, in reality, she didn’t do 3/4 of the things she had initially said she did! Simple answer….one example - she may not have even graduated from university with a double major….first of all because Northwestern University never had the double major she says she graduated in and secondly, after her trying to glue a girls eyelashes together, she was asked to leave and there are no records of her ever going back and/or graduating! School said they have sealed the records (no reason given) no pictures of her graduation from NWU while for all her other graduations there are…and we have never seen a picture of her degree as we have seen when Sam graduated. Lies, lies and more lies! That’s what MARKLE knows how to do best!

[@Supernovae2010]

Their H&R Titles were stripped by the Queen in 2020, indeed. (That's why they have lost their scotlandyard security and public funds.) But, it took 5.000 pages to sign to close the case (other titles, funding, etc...). That's why it took so long...And now that it's official, they changed the Titles in their website. They removed them from the responsabilities they had, it's normal, they quit the Royal Family. Why should the Royal Family 's website promote Harry and Meghan's career? They are out, for good.

[@angelasims2759]

they were never removed just told not allowed to use them.

[@robdalton4349]

It seems to be an appropriate update to what the situation is now. Nothing wrong with that.

[@patdixon-lj7qs]

They should be known as mr and mrs mountbatten-winsdor since they claimed they didn't want no titles but lived a private life in America with their children but they went back on their words and doing the opposite

[@sarahwaters5475]

Reducing the information about MM is, in my opinion, a reflection of the situation between PH and his wife. She has removed herself from the UK and Royal duties and this summary reflects that. Apart from the apparent bearing and birthing of the two children, which is causing discussions of protocol etc, what else has she done for the UK?

[@EC-lq3qw]

What has she done for anyone, other than herself?

[@teresa90001]

Megaliar did not birth bear royal children

[@rileyperkins2724]

@@teresa90001 You know this how?

[@lulamantshephe5595]

Is that you M????

[@rosalindjamison9202]

Did she really give birth? What is the truth about that?

[@juliawallace1389]

No mention of her children being in line of succession or indeed being legitimate!speaks volumes!

[@ManzelaManz-pk8zy]

There are none!!!!!!

[@D1331D]

MM doesn't have any connection with what was written before. She walked away, gave it up, didn't want to serve and support others only herself. The update now shows the true details as they are now.

[@154_madison]

Except they are still listed as working royals which they are not! 🤦🏻‍♀️🤷🏻‍♀️🙄

[@deidremulroe2461]

She got what she wanted, a Luxurious Lifestyle fame & fortune but KARMA is BANGING on her door now.. And the Clown Prince she married lost everything because of the Dillusional Grandure and GREED... 🇬🇧

[@BelleMichele99]

while i’m here early i just wanna say, there were all these articles saying Meghan attended the Eras Tour. I’m a Swiftie who attended and continues to follow the tour. no pictures by fans were taken of Meghan at the concert and released on twitter, like how we typically find out celebs are there. she wasn’t in the celebrity tent. she wasn’t in the pictures with her bestie Cameron Diaz. she might have not even been there, and at the least she wasn’t invited by Taylor’s team to the celebrity tent. she is literally so pathetic she had to go to the press and tell them she attended so they could write articles about it. no pics, no videos, no evidence she was even there, so how else would they know unless she (or her assistant) told them?

[@BelleMichele99]

think about it, there are no articles saying “Hilary Duff and Halsey attend the Eras Tour” “Cameron Diaz attends the Eras Tour” because fans took pics, posted them on twitter, we said “cool” and moved on. what about Meghan makes her soooo special that MULTIPLE news outlets write about it? why is she SO desperate to be associated with Taylor, who loves England, who loves the Royal Family, who is friends with our beloved Prince William, Prince of Wales, the future KING??? news flash Megaliar, Taylor is not on your side!!!!!

[@KeiPalace]

@@BelleMichele99 it's not so much multiple news outlets write, most of them have shed their writers and editors, if you read them, it's all copy paste from the same source, such a shame, we need real reporters and real news

[@gerrywrafsimmons7542]

@@KeiPalace you think I've been saying this for a long time.

[@juliawallace1389]

It’s the same as lilys christening no pics all lies!

[@jojox5136]

If she'd been there she would've pushed her way onto the stage

[@dianeash4560]

I think it was condensed so as not to prmote her just simply acknowledge her marriage to Harry. This is good.

[@valentinarodoracio8145]

The Princess’s are not working Royals, they are not on site, the other grands and great grands are not working royals , they like wise, are not on the site, they are all in the line of succession, be it far down, but they’ve been loyal to the Royal family, the late HRM Queen Elizabeth ll, and now King Charles. If only for the reason that Harry is King Charles son, 5th in line ( he should be removed due to his mental health and distain/ disrespect for the institution-Nation) to the throne, therefore presently I believe is the only reason why he’s on the sight.. King Charles has been patient hoping for better from his rouge thankless and whingy traitor of a son, let’s not forget in Harry’s own words he has turned his back on his countrymen/ country.. What does British Monarchy stand for if not the Nation, they are well kept servants of the Nation 🇬🇧 and Commonwealth.. King Charles 1st and foremost pledge is to God and Country, even the Bible tells us to discipline our children in love… tuff love! So that they might return to us with contrite hearts.. Put them both out! Post haste… they have been a thorn in the Nations side for 5 years.. I believe it’s an emotional decision on behalf of the Crown not desiring to rock Harry’s emotional frailty.. though I stand to be corrected if it’s a bigger matter than that, personally I believe him to be deliberate and a conjurer of chaos and ill will towards his Nation and Family.. Keeping those two close puts a bleak future on the Monarchy, they must move forward and separate from this situation, or all honor and respect is lost: The King must be a King first, whilst putting down his authority to God and The Nation he’s sworn to serve. As King Charles is head over church , his son now an adult! He should as his mother did , refer to scripture, Gods council for wisdom.. 1st Timothy 3: 1-5 1This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work. 2A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach; 3not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous; 4one that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity; 5(for if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)

[@gerryhatrick6678]

I am amazed how so many people cannot tell the difference between disagreement and hate. Generally when someone has a differing opinion on a subject they are quick to toss out the label of hater....funny how many times it tends to be those who decry labeling of people....but seem to have no issue using them on people who think differently than they do. In the words of Chris Rock, so many practice SELECTIVE OUTRAGE.

[@nijjijjion204]

What about the years of petty articles about her before she went to America? I mean the media were after her for a type of flower she chose for her wedding saying she was trying to kill the flower girls but then Kate used the exact same flower and they were applauding her for the choice. I don't know how you can explain the contradictory of how the media act for no reason at all for years other than hate. They do it all the time like even to other people as well, media are just cancer to our society, especially ones that try to cause hate and division in our society.

[@rileyperkins2724]

Including Prince Petulant and the Camera Hog?

[@sue8344]

As Ricky Gervais said , ‘Just because you hate it, doesn’t make it hate speech .’ ( or words to that effect )

[@flygrace]

I hate Meghan Markle and I see no reason to pretend I don't. She has done things that earn our hatred.

[@loribernardisunwell9663]

​@@rileyperkins2724only if you're referring to h&m...

[@anneerickson6447]

I like the qualities of analysis, integrity, and intelligence that you manifest in your videos. Thank you. . .

[@vanessabrooks8656]

Meghan was bestowed lavishly with Titles and patronages to several charities after her marriage to Harry, Prince of the Realm as is the function of Royalty and it’s household. In actual fact Meghan did very little work for any of those businesses hardly anything, she was not in the country long enough as a working Royal, it was her personal decision to withdraw from it’s prestigious duties of office…perhaps she found the ‘work’ not to her taste after all. Seems that way as escaping to Canada after such a short time clearly was more appealing, taking her Prince and child with her.

[@KeiPalace]

The HRH titles were taken a long time ago, not certain why the royal website features Harold and Meghan at all! i see it that the Palace doesn't see why they should help these two promote themselves.

[@margaretsmist7140]

He’s still fifth in line. He is listed below the older cousins of the queen that are waaaaaay down the succession tree. He will stay on there until George has kids or parliament removes his by law.

[@Maryanne-tt8jn]

@@margaretsmist7140 for now

[@154_madison]

@@margaretsmist7140 H& the invisible non binary sprogs need removing from the line of succession. After MM’s comment at her expensive baby shower in the US about being one plane crash away from the throne, they pose a real threat the William, Catherine and their three children. It is amazing she managed to have her baby shower in the US - when her passport had been “confiscated” by the palace but she still managed to get out of the country. Another one of those porkie pies. 🙄

[@beabrennan]

The Problem is that some individuals who favor Harry & Meghan are threatening people who have blogs&vlogs with very serious consequences happening to these people who speak out against H&M

[@ManzelaManz-pk8zy]

Das ist ja zum Lachen,was bilden die sich ein?

[@fredrika27]

They are threatening to sue them because they are defaming their characters. If you want to go there we can. But you will loose this discussion because those doing the defamation of character have left evidence we all can view!

[@enkisdaughter4795]

Online bullying, report them

[@suzannegaslin6107]

I think it was because many of the things she claimed she had done weren’t true. Her working for the U.N. as apposed to being an intern is only one example. It would be interesting to compare the archives version to what could actually be verified. Just a thought.

[@christelgrimmer4478]

Don't confuse her speech at a UN meeting with her 5 week internship at the Embassy in Argentina. Two different things blown out of proportion by M M.

[@alisonj9533]

Don't forget she once washed 5kg of rice with women!! Probably exhausted.

[@peterwillson1355]

​@@alisonj9533Exhausted? I imagine they felt suicidal after having to put up with her for that long😂

[@hueginvieny7959]

They should remove them from every thing. The claims they have made about the royal family should be the exact reason to remove them and I'm an American

[@lizhorton5333]

American here. I agree with you. They should remove all traces of her that they can. She has done nothing but create chaos, heartbreak and division IMO.

[@juliad.6372]

Especially her

[@teresaroby4441]

Fellow American & absolutely agree! The website is supposed to depict the "working royals" & neither of these 2 are. Neither is Prince Andrew, for that matter & he too should be removed. By allowing their profiles to remain on the RF website, which is endorsed by KCIII it sends a confusing message to anyone who goes onto the website wanting to know more about the RF & monarchy. I do wonder if KCIII is trying to leave a door open, even if it's just a teensy bit for Harry to return when MM inevitably divorces him? I don't see the UK public ever forgiving him & being ok with his ever returning to life as a working royal. With Andrew, I wonder if he doesn't want to twist the knife any further considering how much has been stripped from Andrew & so publicly. I have for more sympathy for Andrew, even though I think he's an arrogant prick, he didn't get charged or convicted of any crime related to JE & his accuser has been outed as a prolific liar & who is herself, being sued by 2 women that claim she trafficked them as underage girls to JE. Andrew is a good example of what happens when you allow hubris to guide your decision making. He can't even leave his home alone anymore w/o fear of being attacked & has lost all of his military titles & patronages that were close to his heart & pretty much everything else that literally gave him purpose in life, except for his titles. Andrew also hasn't publicly bashed his family with a campaign of vicious, provable lies that damaged the institution that QEII & PP devoted their lives to serving. With that being said, actions have consequences and all 3 need to go.

[@myrnarodriguez2974]

We have zero talorence for people like harry the birdbrain. megan the one that slips n slide bully. .

[@kathyduffyharte1636]

Correct... I don't hate them either but they are commiting treason ...to their king and country. And tax payers and royal supporters have the right to know wots affecting that

[@starrycrown]

It is truly minimization of MM….absolutely. Astute observation, BB!

[@margaretsmist7140]

My guess is there are four major reasons it was just done: 1. The RF gave the two a year to decide what they wanted to do - so that is the first twelve months explained. 2. They could have left and upheld the queens wishes - they didn’t and that has become very obvious since 12/22. 3. The queen may have wanted them treated with kid gloves and after she died, Charles probably wanted a cautious approach to them until after his coronation - that takes us to this summer. 4. I do think the major scrubbing of M’s profile is an acknowledgment the RF is done with her - they may hope H returns and lives a quiet life and in 20 years the UK may welcome him back to some low key patronages.

[@GillNRTT]

I agree, I also think it could be Meghan wanting to take control of her own narrative.

[@JC-qx5qo]

Or have the RF removed the parts that have come under question...

[@kmm62627]

I think it has all been removed because the Royal Family cannot verify what is and is not true. MM was only in Royal Family for 18 months so anything about her should be minimal. I doubt there is any plot - it is sensible to remove content if it cannot be verified.

[@catherinegrimes2308]

I don't think that Harry can be welcomed back, he is untrustworthy.

[@margaretsmist7140]

@@catherinegrimes2308me either but people have short memories and 20 years is a looong time.

[@ryanwisbey3387]

Being erased metaphorically or literally one can only hope the latter

[@jerrygeorgopolis8015]

BBB, I think the Removal of the HRH Titles are a Clear Indicator of what was to come. Excellent overview of the web site, and your views on what you think is happening. Thanks for the video.

[@deidremulroe2461]

He Lost his HRH Title because he walked away from his Royal Life & Country. 🇬🇧 Now KARMA is BANGING on the Door and Snapping at her heels. She only wanted Fame & Fortune, He really believed she Loved him.. JERK Lost everything because of the Yaght girl & Porn star (The Boudoir). ⛵👠🎥💰💰💰💰

[@noelward8047]

The Harkles ran off to The US of A in an attempt to exploit their 'titles' ... backfired Haha

[@sharonschirmer3971]

I love listening to your thoughts and opinions,your intelligence shines through,don’t let the haters shut you down .

[@emilycochrane78]

maybe why it was all removed was because there is no point having all those details up when she has walked away, any work that she did do wasn't done from the heart. so its only logical to remove everything.

[@karenturner7184]

No proof of most if it or it has been prove by the BRF to be lies

[@ymrabc]

She didn’t really do any work.

[@ymrabc]

There is no point even addressing people who throw out the “your a hater” comment, there is nothing you can say that will convince these poor, deluded people that anybody who does not hold the same opinion as them must be a ‘hater’. That phrase is so infantile and laughable and shows they have absolutely no logical or articulate argument to back up this ridiculous phrase so they throw out this phrase instead which is meant to wound you to such degree that you will instantly have a change of heart. They are what used to be referred to as the ‘green ink brigade’ before the days of the internet and social media. By saying you are a hater they are actually doing the very thing that they are accusing you of but they are too deluded to see it.

[@emilycochrane78]

@ymrabc the Sussex squad are out in force against two particular youtubers who report on the latest, who show where they get their sources from. They in no way step over that line and always state clearly whats what and wats fact or what is yet not confirmed etc, they always cover themselves yet the Sussex squad have threatened their lives and doxxed one of them displaying personal photos of their children on line, such danger they are putting people in. Even if proof was put right before the Sussex squads eyes they still wouldn't accept it cos they simply enjoy the lifestyle of being a bully. And why have H&M not called out the Sussex squad on their cyber bullying when they were on calls wit teens/young adults about bullying awareness etc. All this shambles is going to keep circling like a washing machine on full spin with no end until KC3 takes a stand

[@sarahcox5095]

Yes, you're entitled to your opinion. We are all entitled to our opinion also. Keep going.

[@miketan4803]

Less about that grifter & pretender the better. With all the lies she's told, who knows what could cause embarrassment

[@JD-cw4qg]

Hasn't she stepped down from these charities and patronages, I know she has the few she had here in the UK, the animal rescue one being one. So yep, perfectly ok to take down these things that she is no longer involved in.

[@Mary-he1od]

Yeah, how come her description still says she supports this or that charity and the monarchy?? The only thing she does re the monarchy is continuously lie about everything and trashin/mocking all the sr royals each day. The palace website manager needs to do his job properly and fact check everything before publishing it.

[@JD-cw4qg]

@@Mary-he1od totally agree, the witch has stepped down from these patronages and nothing about her supporting these good causes should be on the website, because she doesn't support them. The only thing she supports is her own greedy, grasping ego.

[@kathrynimhoff344]

I noticed on MM's Royal biography that she apparently "completed" an internship at a South American embassy to perfect her knowledge of the Spanish language. Interesting. It was a 6 week internship arranged by her Uncle Mike. She must be a linguistic savant in order to achieve language mastery in 6 weeks...or less. Many stories that it was actually less because of personal conduct issues. Oh well..so many stories that need verifying.

[@carole4119]

It was verified She became involved with a married man and sent back. She had no degree there.!! Please keep abreast if you like ..?but the sources have been checked

[@Kellers-Ma]

We are here for your views. Don't let the critics get to ya. Just keep doing what you're doing 👌

[@eileencollins2536]

Mm is being shown to be as insignificant to the Royal Family as she is to the people of the UK and the Commonwealth 🤷‍♀️

[@sue8344]

Unfortunately there is a large group who categorize as ‘hate speech ‘ anything they disagree with

[@worldgonemad1977]

Absolutely correct!

[@LET337]

Oh yes, express any opinion re Meg and you are instantly accused of racism,hatred and jealousy

[@GloriaRasmussen]

I believe the condensed version is because time has shown that Meghan has been less than fully honest about claims regarding her education and other credentials such that less is definitely better and the royal website is less likely to be implicated in disseminating and perpetuating inaccurate information. I'm glad to see this streamlining.

[@Wanda711]

I think the long delay in updating this website was based on the chance that they might come back. Someone was being very cautious, and probably thought it would be better to just leave things as they were, rather than change the site in one direction, and then have to re-change it back. Perhaps the death of the Queen was seen as a last chance to restore family relations to the way they had been, but the events of 2023 have finally convinced whoever was in charge that there was no going back, and the record has been altered to reflect the current reality.

[@cherylgreen2438]

It seems the ability to debate personal opinions is becoming a lost art. Respecting peoples right to personal opinions, is fast dying out too. I really enjoy your balanced videos, and I find your take on these issues, interesting and informative.

[@lindasnyder420]

Everyone is permitted to have their own opinions about everything. Just because it is different from yours does NOT make it HATE. It seems to me the people always accusing others of hate speech are the ones guilty of actually using it.

[@carole4119]

There are people who are short for words to be nice about it..!! Who use the same words in life over and over.. BUT REALLY HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY ACTUALLY MEAN?? ACTUALLY ILLITERATE.. UNEDUCATED..PEOPLE BLESSINGS

[@monicawarner4091]

@lindasnyder • Anyone who accuses others of being "haters" is more often than not one of the Sugars...the delusional supporters of Harry & his wife. They see any critique of the pair's behaviour as being driven by hatred or jealousy.

[@Llawwddogg]

Newsworthy, and it's about time that it happened. Enjoying your channel.

[@derek.....]

I saw Meghan Markle wearing a T-shirt that had the word “babe” on it and thought to myself “yeah! that was a great movie!”

[@dorismajefsky7405]

Blah Blah ok if i am thinking what you are thinking that was funny. And True

[@marysteelman6534]

Hahaha!!! (Made me spill my coffee!) 😂🤣😂 Wasn’t “Babe” a pig??? 🐷🐖🐽 Oink!!!

[@nomadscavenger]

But she's still a Royal one, if Harry does another tell-all it is going to be as an x-Royal (I'm hoping). The movie was too cute, and many parents, and adult males thought it was so much more sympathetic towards the Babe and that species of mammal than any version of Meghan so far. Wives should do everything in their power to breach the gaps in families, not encourage and do themselves everything they can to make them wider, impossible to close. She's mentally ill and has tapped into Prince Got Rocks(diamonds/$£) illness for her own ends. What an actress, but couldn't ever get hired in Hollywood for even a decent comedy or children's story. But with this romance movie to be made symbolically representing her and Harry's deep love and "connection" for each other, that's exactly what it can be expected to be a comedy, and child's fable to learn by.

[@dorismajefsky7405]

@@marysteelman6534 haha yes that is why i was laughing my head off and yes i know with my cuppa the same hehe .

[@jacquelinegrace778]

😂😂👏👏👏👏

[@felsenruh]

What needs to happen is for Henry and his "children" to be removed from the line of succession AND for Henry to be removed from his role as a councilor of state.

[@asiaticamericanflower5476]

Harry and his wife are so toxic beyond words. BRF should limit to minimum exposure abt that toxic duo from their life and website.

[@beabrennan]

Don’t they have their own Archwell site where they can publish all the stuff they’re not doing

[@lizhorton5333]

Good point!

[@teresanaranjo490]

The subject of your videos are driven by what the people want to hear but with your legal opinion as an aggregated value. I just can't see why there would be someone who sees them as hate videos. You've made this very clear.

[@nerisolivero385]

Excellent. Lo de "video de odio" es departe de la misma tarjeta de MEGAN: RACISMO ES ESE SU BUQUE INSIGNIA: RACISMO.

[@karenjones1]

​@@nerisolivero385 Please point out where he is racist. Having a different opinion does not make one racist. But, as you called him racist twice, you should easily be able to point it out.

[@LesleyRhodes]

I agree Karen

[@teresanaranjo490]

@@karenjones1 I had a hard time to understand the comment above yours. Thanks to your response I can see where it comes from.

[@teresanaranjo490]

@@nerisolivero385 Para entender mejor a lo que te refieres debes incluir el link del video del odio. No tengo la menor idea a qué te refieres.

[@nolaladyuptown]

I believe the changes show remarkable restraint by the Royal Family; forget about what they took out, they could have added so much more in her description. Meghan is lucky the Royal website just stuck to her basic information and left it at that!

[@bluehannah8696]

I think when someone is no longer part of your organization, it’s inappropriate to try to represent them in any significant way. I think it’s appropriate that they minimize what they say about her relative to her relationship to the family, and let her own website represent or characterize her life.

[@lincliff663]

This is a great channel - especially if you have an interest in the law because details are explained clearly & patiently. The people who enjoy sending negative comments on various channels probably live their lives in a way most people wouldn't understand.

[@melvynplantmusic]

Sooner they disappear in to obscurity the better.

[@loisberry-rose5175]

Please tell the British press to stop covering them, or making up stories about them, because they really do not know, what the Sussexes are doing.

[@janloftness]

Amen!

[@alidabotes6264]

Ignore the uninlightened. Report as you normally do.

[@sherylbeamer7189]

Love your channel and intelligent discussion! I think BOTH are significant because it seems we’ve been waiting for a long time for the removal of HRH but I appreciate your insight about the grand reduction in verbal effluent concerning the wife. ☺️

[@blackaliss9488]

Something tells me that this happened to remind Harry that he is not HRH after he told the court to refer to him as HRH Prince Harry during his disatrous trial. Someone took notice and got onto the job asap

[@Thunderbird68-i2f]

This is interesting; I wouldn't doubt it.

[@jinxysanchez2990]

It's going to be interesting to hear your views on the surrogate situation when it is discussed as it will be. The UK courts have paramountconsideration when it comes to the welfare consideration of surrogate children

[@phoebegreig6523]

Honestly I don’t know why everyone is actually surprised that the HRH status has been taken down from the site. Harry AGREED that he would not be using his or Meghan’s HRH status when they left the royal family in 2020.. Good for Charles for finally following through with the agreement

[@cbtink2]

This is not a perfect explanation with background proof, but just based on what I know as of now, the things they removed were things largely related to work and information prior to her time in the royal family. Besides the idea it was done for personal reasons, maybe they felt it was best to just remove it all instead of sorting through it to leave only information relevant to her time as a working royal. Just my supposition & thoughts.

[@Wizardofwords-g7v]

@BlackbeltSecrets I'm just responding with my thoughts on why the length of Harry's Bio is longer than Meghan's. It actually makes sense to me. Harry has always been in the Royal Family and the contributions he's made in terms of the website, are contributions he made as a member of the Royal Family. Meghan was only in the family for a short period of time and that long bit about her career, hobbies, UN stuff etc, all happened before she met Harry and whilst she was a private citizen of the US. Of course when she joined the RF they put that in the website to puff her up a bit and to say what she's about, now it serves no purpose to have something in that happened when she wasn't a member of the RF yet. In actual fact, it only highlights how miniscule her actual contribution to the RF was, while she was still part of it. Nothing of note. In respect of your remark at the start of the video that you don't talk in hate or spew hatred, I agree. You're actually very professional in your videos and I never felt that you acted unfairly. That's why I subscribed to both your Channels. As I love cooking I subscribed to your wife's Channel as well. I just want to mention that both @SteftheAlterNerd and Andy Signore at @pocornedPalace have been threatened severely and dangerously by the so called Sussex Squad and Christopher Bouzy who even contributed in an article about them in Newsweek. They were doxed and pictures of Andy's family including his kids were posted on Social media (all platforms) threatening to show up at his kids school and harass the the same way in their crazy minds that they are "harassing" Meghan. Don't you think this dangerous behaviour of Meghan's fans, the Sussex Squad, and Christopher Bouzy, their friend, is going directly against their video and support last week to a Youth Group about Cyberbullying. The actual people doing the cyberbullying are H&Ms very own supporters and dear Netflix friend, Christopher Bouzy, Maybe this will be something you can talk about on Blackbelt Barrister? Greetings from South Africa where nobody asked Meghan if she was OK. 🇿🇦

[@anneerickson6447]

This is the first time that the explanation fits the events - those that have been proven. Oh, to have been a fly on the wall. . .

[@pieraonofri1606]

Oh, it’s more than right that the page is short and imo, the statement that she continues to back/uphold the monarchy shouldn’t be there at all….she’s never upheld the Queen/Monarchy!! She did all she could to go against the crown and what it represents! Welcome aboard Barrister…I know you had more important things to do than follow these two around!!

[@FYD523]

It appears to me that the info about MM may still be there on the current page but is not so obvious. It looks like one has to click on biography and charities at the top left to see them. I totally agree this appears to be minimalising her presence.

[@eddiebruv]

The website has probably been pared down to only include a verified summation of her past, and only have details of duties actually carried out during her extremely short period as a bona fide Royal.

[@barryseaton3121]

Your views and thoughts are indeed valuable and certainly well informed.

[@Whatyathink-hy4kr]

The Queen had put their HRH in abeyance and they were not to be used as of the date of announcement back in 2020 after the summit. They did not comply and we’re using it on their stationary correspondence and even Harry in is last court case wanted to be addressed as HRH PRINCE HARRY. To this day that have commercialized their titles and status for financial profit which was not to be allowed yet continued. In getting back to the fact that Meghan’s website page has been severely shortened, I believe this reflects and is evidence that the Royal family had whitewashed and boosted up her profile when she entered the family. If you look carefully you’ll notice that she really did not make the contributions to society that are embellished . They made her look like a contributing member of the Monarchy which in reality was entirely inflated. The update minimizes her w/o the inflated, embellished coating. It is now just a brief, statistical listing to reflect the fact that she was acknowledged but not important and is there by association with Prince Harry. In my opinion this is being done in preparation of perhaps marital status or other upcoming changes. In saying that my speculation is that Harry will stay with Meghan and Meghan will dump him when she finds her next host. There is definitely a plan in the works , in my opinion, in regards to the Royal family dealing w/ the situation in regards to H&M.

[@Thunderbird68-i2f]

Well said

[@Catlover2091]

I believe she only worked for 72 days as an actual working Royal so yes would be appropriate to remove the blurb as it wasn’t ongoing and only for a few months at best. Harry has been a Royal from the day he was born and a working Royal for years which is more appropriate

[@hussainamina]

If there’s a house he curtailment of Harry in the following weeks, then I’m not worried. If his isn’t curtailed THRN I WOULD BE SERIOUSLY WORRIED because it implies the potential for him thinking (or Charles thinking) his respect & working royal status can be reinstated. It can’t. We won’t allow such a flagrant breach of respect for the people of this country who don’t believe Harry can EVER be rehabilitated now we’ve glimpsed the hatred in his heart. [the only other reason MM’s might’ve been reduced is that they’ve found out she told a bunch of lies and they’re finally had each of them confirmed. And rather than explaining which were lies & which were truth, they’re reduced to summarising the trays they know - which amounts to very little].

[@GUULLIVER]

Why is she there (in the website) at all? Should she be there in the first place since she is not a working royal?

[@pozzee2809]

Don’t pay any attention to the naysayers. Love hearing your opinions 🇨🇦

[@kellyfalletta1949]

Thank you. I knew Queen Elizabeth removed Harry & Meghan’s HRH titles when they stepped down as working royals. Yet Harry used the HRH reference during his court case in UK. I think condensed version of Meghan’s participation is more significant. Not necessarily unwarranted however. Meghan’s participation in those patronages seemed extremely disingenuous and more as self-promotion. Her actions since, certainly justify being nothing more than a footnote in royal website.

[@Annie-yv7rc]

I wish parliament could find two hours to debate this and get rid of their titles altogether. What they have done some years ago would have amounted to treason. Can we start a petition to get it (not sure of the term) disused/ debated in parliament sooner than you mentioned in one of your last videos

[@margaretnicol3423]

Whoever is responsible for the website needs to get their act together!!!

[@TinaBryning]

My best guess as to why the information about Meghan has been “condensed” is two fold. Firstly she was only a working member of the RF and resident in the UK for about 18 months and she has lived in the US and had no royal role whatsoever for more than twice that length of time. Secondly perhaps there was an issue with the provenance of the information contained in the archived version, and so it was more accurate just to summarise her position in the RF, as in sex, nationality, date of birth and marriage and number of children. My personal view is that she is extremely unlikely to set foot on British soil again; she will never fulfill a royal role again….she’s a Duchess in name only and she’s superfluous to requirement by most of the British people who barely saw her, and who will be very happy if she remains in the USA pursuing her show-bizzy lifestyle.

[@DeborahWohlfeld]

I think there were updates to all senior royals titles. Not just the removal of the HRH.

[@spearheadchina]

Karma working it's way through a rebalancing!

[@johnhargreaves6698]

Making people aware of things that may have been ignored or avoided by mainstream media is not a bad thing. Keep up the good work.

[@PoppyMom1]

I thought that when they “stepped back” from their royal duties, they were not supposed to use their HRH’s? I only ask because at his latest legal hearing, he told them to address him as “His Royal Highness” and then thereafter, they could call him Sir or PH?? Or did I read that wrong?

[@ShalimarPicasso]

The Royal Grift showed a video yesterday from a US news broadcaster having several members of the Democrats speaking....Markle continues to harass them by writing letters to them with her Duchess of Sussex letterhead and signature trying to push herself into some of their campaigns. These people were publicly displaying their disarray for this woman because 1. They don't want her 2. She is constantly breaking the Royal protocole...she is NOT supposed to use her titles, yet she does it shamelessly and Harry doesn't seem to have a problem with it either. That's why it's so important that both of them are stripped off any titles

[@mjbalmmac1588]

Hoping even more gets erased for the couple. I don’t want to see them on site at all. They stepped back and should be entirely removed. Web site should just be exclusively working royals.

[@brucetaylor8848]

So when he heads back to court the judge has no need to refer to him as a royal....great

[@ElfrosineAurelia11]

Truly enjoy your clips. The information is really insightful and useful

[@elizabethbishbish992]

Perhaps the Palace have found out most of her achievements are lies or exaggerated.

[@manuelacoelho9723]

If some people do not like or agree with making your personal views and opinions known then they do not have to log on. I listen because I want to. Not because I’m forced to. Free choice!

[@LesleyRhodes]

She has done absolutely nothing for the RF. She needs deleting

[@sallymclaren7239]

Earlier this year or late last year the Royal Family were advertising for someone to run their website, which, apparently, runs to well over 1,000 pages.. However the salary they were offering at that time was very low for a competent IT professional so it may have taken some time for them to find someone. Traditionally the Royal Family paid their staff low salaries as it was deemed to be an honour to work for the RF. While the late Queen was alive, given her age, she probably did not view the website as a high priority. She had managed the RF brilliantly without one for many years Since her death the Royal Family have been incredibly busy - so many major events to organise - funeral, coronation etc and with a much reduced number of senior royals. The Royals' diaries get booked up at least 6 months and often a year in advance so when major events suddenly happen there is a huge amount to rearrange and it may have been difficult for Charles and William to find the time to make decisions together on what should / should not be changed and then approve the changes. I am sure they are deliberately reducing information about Meghan and generally downgrading the Sussexes. I believe the late Queen told the Sussexes not to use HRH but, and I may be wrong, I don't think she actually removed the HRH. As the Sussexes have started using the HRHs recently I suspect that may be why they have been removed on the website.

[@Mike-H_UK]

I think it is mainly a case of The Royal Family looking to the future without H & M. Sometime people make lots of incremental, small changes to a website, and on other occasions, people take a step back, look at the webpage and decide on a more extensive refresh. This is the latter and an acknowledgement that the future is without them.

[@Dogtagnan]

There are certain people who use the word "hate" against you when you simply disagree with their point of view. I'm not sure whether it's a reaction to the challenge to a POV they haven't really thought through, or whether they haven't learned the nuances of English. As an oldie myself I find it rather grating.

[@ManzelaManz-pk8zy]

Sie sind eh bezahlt die "Sugars",wen inte ressiert was die schreiben oder möchten???😂😂😂

[@wht-rabt-obj]

No explanation needed. Don't give the trolls and haters your time and attention. They're gonna troll no matter what you say or do.

[@sonia.jarrett]

I believe they should have all titles removed, they don't seem as though they are coming back into royal life, I know Prince Andrew is no longer a working royal, but he is still with his family keeping his mouth closed

[@coolcat-tw1hl]

You are fair, honest, straight forward, and ALWAYS state this is your opinion. You do not lie, do not go the low road, but are an honorable man. H&M sugars can not understand those values any more then their “leaders” do and the reason for their stupidity is they have no honor. Will always watch this channel and have respect for you. Your other channel is a great one to watch to learn all kinds of information on many subjects. Thank you for your hard work. And for the sugars, it's the delete button to push then you are gone and we can enjoy in peace. Know it is a hard thing to know but you can do it. Maybe!!!!!!

[@Caitness1]

Thank you for sharing your opinion and standing up for the right to do so. Also thanks for showing where the HRH had been replaced with the Duke title, because when I had a quick look at the Royal Website I couldn't see what had changed at first.

[@andrearoyd2942]

The point about the HRH titles, is the semantics of the debate. They were not supposed to use the HRH title, they haven't the website was tardy in removing said reference. FINE GET IT. The point is have the HRH titles now be REMOVED from them completely and the privileges attached? THAT IS THE POINT.

[@cloudybeforerain7134]

Harry’s HRH, and the privileges that go with it, is “in abeyance”, i.e. suspended indefinitely. QEII did that when they “stepped back”. This was the reason for Harry complaining about his security being pulled, something his father had warned him about prior to them leaving. Some people get upset about his public style being in abeyance because it leaves open the possibility of reinstatement at some point. Given everything Harry did after leaving Britain - doc, book, interviews - I cannot see his father, or later, his brother reinstating him.

[@hilarycoombes4137]

Because most of it was just PR and not genuine.

[@sabbygonzaga2349]

You are not a hater you are just giving your honest opinion.

[@drdeb_ocherry]

I expressed my opinion the other day and KZbin put me into KZbin jail for 23 hours. Where are all the courageous attorneys in the US, why aren't they organizing a class action suit using the constitution, American broadcast Association, or any of the laws governing protected speech on the Internet?

[@blackbeltsecrets]

Yikes!

[@keyssunsetsforlife7650]

It’s taken too long for the us update and other updates need to be made on that website particularly relating to them. I’m sorry that the squad has found you and has begun using the same old tactics on anyone who has an opinion that is different than yours. Thank you for your coverage