True history In fact, Today's Khmers are Javanese who were forcibly removed from Java as workers. As the Khmer workforce increased, they created laws to overthrow the former colonists. escape from the land The former colonial ruler A came to seize the land back from the Khmers and ruled the Khmers for 432 years. It can be seen that when the rebels won, they ruled the Khmer land for a long time. But Khmer architecture no longer exists. Why can't the Khmers restore their original architecture? Because the modern Khmers were not the creators of these things. and have no knowledge of repairing the original architecture They are therefore called khom, not Khmer.
@princeblworldКүн бұрын
❤️🤍💙💙🤍❤️
@Israeli_PrinceКүн бұрын
Thai people keep embarrassing themselves with lies. Cambodians have been repairing ancient architecture for decades. It's called Mon-Khmer and not Mon-Thai. Without lies, Thailand dies.
ขอมไม่ใช่กัมพูชา เพราะ DNA กัมพูชาเหมือนกับอินโดนีเซีย
@princeblworldКүн бұрын
🇵🇭🇹🇭🙏🙏❤️🤍💙💙🤍❤️
@chongtun9320Күн бұрын
ศิลาจารึกโบราณในพม่าก็บอกไว้ขอมคือไทย
@princeblworldКүн бұрын
❤️🤍💙💙🤍❤️
@poomwongveeratappibran3265Күн бұрын
@@chongtun9320 พิมพ์อังกฤษว่าKhom
@noknatchanok5010Күн бұрын
Currently, the descendants of the Khom people are building an ancient stone temple more magnificent than Angkor Wat. The construction is expected to take three generations, or approximately 200 years. The site is called Sihanakhon City and is located in Buriram Province, Thailand.
@princeblworldКүн бұрын
❤️🤍💙💙🤍❤️
@poomwongveeratappibran3265Күн бұрын
In the past, during the hunting period France seizes Thailand's right bank There are 3 countries: Laos, Cambodia and Vietnam. The French found a large stone castle. In Siem Reap, many French historians were mobilized. Search for the history of Angkor Wat, so history was written that the Khmers were great in order to invade To invade Siam by citing the history that the French made up, even though the Khmers had been under Siam for 400 years. Being in France What benefits would there be in writing history for the Khmer-French people at that time? 1. Historical stories can be used to attack Siam in order to destroy Siam at that time. 2. It shows off the power of the antiquity of their own settlement between England and France. The architecture of the occupied settlements is on display. For example, England ruled India. and very ancient Egypt Therefore, the French were afraid of losing face and wrote a history of the Khmer people. Even though the Khmers had been under Thai rule for 400 years. The French did not ask Siam at that time to write history. Even though they cannot be separated How do you separate it from 400 years of Khmer rule under Siam? Even though the territory is close to each other. There are more Siamese people. But write to make Khmer great. Thai people nowadays ask Khmer what is great? Khmer was a colony of Siam for 432 years. has been a Vietnamese colony for 41 years. It was a French colony for 90 years. It's only been a country for 71 years. What does it take to become great? When is it great?
You can visit Guimet Museum in paris there are khom artifacts one of which is " Le Baion " temple display model in the description it read out LE BAION Monument lamere à Angher-Them - SIAM- Fathulle alet (1899) GA.FILOZ There is a funny story of a young Cambodian gentleman goes by the name Laoss Classic who happened to be in Paris he a tour guide for Angkor wat temple and was giving tour of these european folks who were filming Laoss Classic he was very thrilled to show these folks around the mesueme as he approached the display model the video interrupting cuts off the next thing you see him he walk a way from the display model his reaction was priceless looked like he was possessed by a ghost and said " wooow..." while looking at another artifact with blank stare one minute he was thrilled the next minute his body language completely flipped up side down.😂
: Wikipedia states that 1006-1050 AD during the reign of King Suryavarman I, the son of a king of Tambralinga[3] under the Srivijaya Kingdom, located in the Malay Peninsula (currently Singhanakara/Songkhla and Nakhon Si Thammarat), while his mother was of KHOMs descent, making him claim the right to succeed to the KHOMs throne of the Angkor Kingdom. He occupied Chenla Nam, the origin of Angkor Kampot. 1080-1107 AD King Jayavarman VI of the Suywong Dynasty from Phimai, Nakhon Ratchasima, defeated his rivals and established himself as the first king of the Mahidharapura royal family in Chenla Bok (Isanapura and Sri Khotrabura). 1122-1218 AD during the reign of King Jayavarman VII, he led a royal army from Lavo (Lopburi, Thailand) to attack Angkor. Returned from the King of the Champa Kingdom who had taken control of Angkor at that time. Then King Jayavarman VII led an army to invade and conquer the Champa Kingdom, successfully annexing the Champa territory to be part of the empire. He rounded up Champa royal family members and slaves as prisoners to use as labor to build various stone castles. 1295-1308 The records of Zhou Daguan, a Chinese envoy who came to Angkor during the reign of King Indravarman III, recorded that there were more "slave laborers" in the city than slave owners. They rose up in revolt to seize power and established themselves as the first king of the Norodom dynasty, named Somdet Phra Ongchai/King Tang Wan/King Trasok Praem, establishing themselves as the first king of the Norodom dynasty and reigning as the king of Angkor Luang in 1336-1340. Summary of information on Wikipedia: The origin of the Khmer dynasty of Angkor was descended from the Siamese people in the Tambralinga/Srivijaya kingdoms. (Nakhon Si Thammarat), Isan Pra, Phimai, Lavo (Lopburi), Ayutthaya-Thonburi-Rattanakosin-Siam-Thailand-Vietnam-France ... The Siamese were the rulers of the KHOM Empire with the Khmer as slaves, not the Khmer Empire as the colonialist's lie that wanted to show that they were superior to the great colony. This is consistent with the historical records of both Thailand and Cambodia, which state that the KHOMs who fled the rebellion by slave labor from Phra Nakhon to establish a new city in Ayutthaya, took only 4 years (1340 AD) before King U Thong led the Ayutthaya army back to suppress the Taeng Wan rebellion successfully for the first time and led the army back to attack repeatedly for a total of 14 years, causing Phra Nakhon-Angkor Wat to be deserted from that time
@princeblworldКүн бұрын
Thank you for sharing this information.
@princeblworldКүн бұрын
🙏🙏🙏❤️🤍💙💙🤍❤️
@ผมเป็นแมวครับКүн бұрын
This is explained in detail. Thank you for publishing the information in English.😊😊😊😊😊
@porpaemuuntuup2912Күн бұрын
The word "Khom" does not exist in Khmer language. It is a word used by the Tai Kadai ethnic group. Call a group of people who are in the southern region than your own group. This word was found in the inscription of Wat Si Chum, Sukhothai Province ,Thailand, referring to "Khomsabad Khon Lampong". As for Khmer, they call themselves Khmer since the 12th century. There is an inscription at the stake KA.64 in Prey Veng Province , Claimbodia . There is one passage that says " กญม.แขมร์ " means a servant (slave) who is Khmer. Therefore, Khmer has been used for labor for a long time. After Nai Taeng Wan, the ancestor of the present Khmer , seized power from the Khom King. So he has ruled until this day.(from the records of Nak Ong Duang The 108th King of Cambodia).There are Burmese scholar who confirm that "Khom" is not "Khmer".!!! kzbin.info/www/bejne/oYPcZJ17r8hqZtkfeature=shared
@princeblworldКүн бұрын
Thank you.
@princeblworldКүн бұрын
❤️🤍💙💙🤍❤️
@abmongКүн бұрын
This is the part of Thai nationalism that worries me, it's bordering on racism towards the Khmer and seeks to claim ancient Khmer culture as Siamese and therefore Thai. The truth is a lot more nuanced and complicated. You'll see the name "Khom" being used in this argument by Thais, basically this is the Thai name for the ancient Khmer who originally built/ruled Angkor Wat. Long story short the Khmer are split into lots of different ethnic tribes, the main ones being Upper Khmer and Lower Khmer. The Upper Khmer were also known as Khom by the Mon-Tai or ancient Thais. The Khom subjugated the Lower Khmer and the Khom-Khmer Kingdom became a two caste system, the Khom as rulers and the Khmer as the lower caste. The Khom Kings married Mon and Tai princesses from Mon-Tai city states to form alliances mostly to fight the Champa. Over time the Khom royals became a mixed family. That's the basics of the claim by some Thais that the Khom were Thai/Siam and therefore Siam built Angkor Wat. There's an element of truth to that but it's a very small part of the bigger picture. The Khmer eventually rebelled against the Khom and founded a new Khmer dyansty. That's when the alliances with the Mon-Tai cities ended because those former allies of the Khom didn't recognize the new Khmer dynasty as legitimate. That's when the Empire fell apart. Some Khom left the Khmer Kingdom (which later became Cambodia) and went as refugees and settled with the Mon-Tai cities, some founding new cities. King U-Thong who founded the city of Ayodhaya (later becoming Ayutthaya) was said to be a Khom noble or prince who refused to serve the new Khmer dynasty who had over-throne the old Khom dynasty and usurped the throne of Angkor Wat. That's why King U-Thong began attacking Angkor Wat soon after he established Ayodhaya. That's how Thais inherited Khom culture, because Ayodhaya was founded as a mixed city of Khom, Mon and Tai peoples who later adopted the Thai identity. But for Thais to say that Khmer is not Khom is not entirely fair. When the Khmer rebelled and over-threw the Khom not all Khom left in a mass exodus, There were Khom who stayed and mixed with the Khmer so today's Cambodians are Khmer who are a mix of Khom and Khmer. The Khmer however didn't look after the culture and traditions of the Khom that's why a lot of it is lost to Cambodia, the things that survived, survived mostly through the Khom traditions that evolved into the culture and traditions of Thailand. When the French colonized Cambodia they wrote a history of Cambodia that completely ignored the distinction between the Khom and the Khmer, That's why the Khmer Empire is known as the Khmer Empire, because it was the French version of history that was exported and taught around the western world. To Thais it's always been known as the Khom Empire. It's not known why the French did this, it's either through genuine misunderstanding or it was intentional because France also wanted to colonize Siam and maybe aimed to use "historic" claims made in their version of history to lay claim to territories that then belonged to Siam. Anyway that's the short version.
Current linguistic and cultural evidence compared to the past, and current DNA evidence compared to the past of the human race, can indicate the origin of the various races. The original Thai language, according to the “Handbook for Reading and Translating Khmer Scripts” by the National Library of Thailand, Department of Fine Arts, Ministry of Culture, states that the Khmer script was adapted from Pali (not from Khmer) and evolved into the current Thai language. It is a Tai-Kadai language of the original Suvarnabhumi people of all countries that has both forms and tones and has a base 10 number system that is universally the same throughout the region. Except for the Khmer language, which migrated into the heavens during the Khmer era (like the large number of Khmer workers entering Thailand today), it received the language and culture from the Khmer lords to use in serving the Khmer lords in daily life, which has been used until the present. Therefore, it can be contradicted and claimed today. In addition to not evolving, it has also regressed in development, returning to mix with the basic principles of the language and using words of the original DNA lineage that came from the Indonesian islands. No form and tone, the number system has regressed to base 5. Different from ... the Khmer language and the Tai-Hadai language family of the original Suvarnabhumi people of all nations, which have both form and tone and have a number system of base 10 like the universal world, the same throughout the region. (The Suai or Kui language in the lower northeast has a number system of base 10 like the Thai language and all Suvarnabhumi people.) The results of the DNA test on all ancient skeletons in Suvarnabhumi found that they were all Tai/Tai-Kadai tribes ... unlike the Khmer DNA from ancient times to the present day, which is similar to the cannibal tribes in the Indonesian islands ... different from all original Suvarnabhumi people. The world record has recorded the emergence of the new city of Ayutthaya as the same period as the collapse of the Khmer-Angkor Wat empire. However, because the "Khmer" people were 3 - 4 times less in number than the Khmer labor force, they were regularly rebelled by the Khmer. Until there were many stone inscriptions cursing the Khmers in the same way, the "Khmers" fled to build a new city in Ayutthaya with help from Lavo and U Thong. They built the city for only 4-15 years before leading an army back to suppress the Khmer rebellion completely. However, they did not return to rule the city of Phra Nakhon and did not recruit the Khmers back to Ayutthaya because they did not want the same rebellions again. The carvings on the walls of Angkor Wat carved images of slave laborers who looked like the ancient Khmers, who still live in real life in present-day Cambodia. However, the walls were carved to glorify the mighty Siamese army of almost 20 armies... which no human race would have the common sense to carve to show their slavery, but instead carved to glorify their enemies in the castles they built. Including real evidence, antiques, historical sites, stone inscriptions, inscriptions, and local records of all local countries. It is recorded that Khmer is Khmer, who are immigrants who came to work as laborers to build castles, to serve the “Khmer/Siamese/Thai” people, where slave laborers had to know the culture and traditions of the “Khmer” masters in order to serve the “Khmer” masters and serve the colonial countries in their daily lives all along… (similar to foreign laborers who went to work in various countries who had to adapt and learn the language, culture, and laws of that country to practice) Apart from teaching/brainwashing in the national education system, no more than 2-4 hours a day, with fictitious lies as created by the colonial masters to deceive the Khmer people into pretending to be the KHOMs, which overlaps both in time and place with the Dvaravati Kingdom, where even the Tripitaka of Buddhism mentions Dvaravati, which is a fictitious lie that is a story of the past, with no evidence that can prove the truth at all. The governors who ruled the city were established from Siam. The umbrellas were forbidden to be made as many layers as Siam, etc. The Khon dance was just learned from Thai teachers. The Thai government’s ten-tier craftsmen, who were traitors, just sold them a few years ago. The country just gained independence from the French colonizers. Established as a country in 1953 ... In this way, where in which period will Khmer/Khmer/Kmir take the freedom to create their own culture? In addition to teaching/brainwashing, no more than 2-4 hours a day, with imaginary lies that claim to be past events, without any evidence that can prove the truth. Chenla are KHOMs/SIAM/Thai masters of Kmer. According to Wikipedia, even though it is a website founded and run by the French who were the Khmer colonialists.
@princeblworldКүн бұрын
Wow! That's a very long explanation. I hope this information reaches out to many foreigners who misunderstand things. Thank you for sharing this. 🙏🙏🙏🙏
แค่คุณอย่าหลงประเดนคือชื่อค่ะ Khom is not Khmer (Khmer คือทาส ) Khom คือนาย❤️
@princeblworldКүн бұрын
❤️🤍💙💙🤍❤️
@kihamoni17 сағат бұрын
Most basic evidence is Thai’s ancient capital name “ayutthaya ,ayothaya” . it came from India, from Hindu. We know Khom is something about Indian culture or something Hindu. And Cambodia never had anything like that after “Trasak Praem” took that country away from the owner😅
@abmongКүн бұрын
Siam, also Syam Kuk, is the name that denotes a tribe of Tai people, a branch of the Tai-Kadai speaking peoples.
I'm Thai but i think Khom is Indian. since Khom have Lord Shiva as main god and Thai have Lord Vishnu as main god as represent that we are the same race.
ข้อมูลบันทึกโบราณจากจีนของนายโจที่มาอยู่ที่เขมรในช่วงเวลานั้นกล่าวว่า คนสยามคือกษัตริย์ราชวงศ์วรมัน พระเจ้าชัยวรมันที่ 6 และพระเจ้าชัยวรมันที่ 7 ผู้สร้างนครวัดและนครธมเป็นคนสยาม คำว่าสยามหรือสวายามเป็นชื่อของพระราชบิดาของพระเจ้าชัยวรมันที่ 6 จากเมืองพิมาย คนจากพิมายสามารถทอผ้าไหมและชำนาญการตัดเย็บเสื้อผ้า ส่วนเขมรทาสที่ทอผ้าและเย็บผ้าแบบปราณีตไม่เป็น นายช่างที่สร้างปราสาทเป็นคนที่มาจากลพบุรีและพิมายของสยาม สร้างปราสาทตั้งแต่สมัยพระเจ้าสุริยวรมันที่ 2 แล้วเสร็จในสมัยพระเจ้าชัยวรมันที่ 7 เขมรเป็นทาสที่ใช้แรงงานมีประมาณ 6 แสนคน ส่วนพวกที่เป็นเจ้านายมีประมาณ 4 แสนคน เมื่อถึงพุทธศักราช1336 นายทาสที่ชื่อตรอซ็อกผแอมได้ยึดอำนาจแล้วโค่นล้มราชวงศ์วรมัน ฆ่าคนสยามประมาณ 1 แสนคน ที่เหลือประมาณสามแสนคนหนีไปสยาม ต่อมาพระเจ้าอู่ทองตั้งกรุงศรีอยุธยา หลังจาก 14 ปีจึงมายึดเมืองคืนจากเขมร Ancient Chinese records from Mr. Cho who was in Cambodia at that time stated that the Siamese were the kings of the Varman dynasty, King Jayavarman VI and King Jayavarman VII, who built Angkor Wat and Angkor Thom, were Siamese. The word Siam or Swayam was the name of the father of King Jayavarman VI from Phimai. People from Phimai could weave silk and were skilled in tailoring. As for the Khmer slaves who could not weave or sew delicate fabrics, the craftsmen who built the castle were people from Lopburi and Phimai of Siam. The castle was built during the reign of King Suryavarman II and was completed during the reign of King Jayavarman VII. There were about 600,000 Khmer slaves who worked as laborers, while there were about 400,000 who were masters. In 1336 B.E., a slave master named Trosok Pheam seized power and overthrew the Varman dynasty, killing about 100,000 Siamese people. The remaining 300,000 people fled to Siam. Later, King U Thong established the city of Ayutthaya. After 14 years, he came to reclaim the city from the Khmer. kzbin.info/www/bejne/nHaslYB9r6ern7c
@princeblworldКүн бұрын
🇵🇭🇹🇭🙏🙏❤️🤍💙💙🤍❤️
@Israeli_PrinceКүн бұрын
You have no light in your eyes, without lies Thailand dies.