Huge respect to the Chinese ambassador speaking cold hard truth and not being swayed by western propaganda
@Aaron-gs5si4 күн бұрын
Bot
@andrewking9435Ай бұрын
Classic display of having someone intelligent and articulate to deflect
@LampoonGoonАй бұрын
Villains often have the rather splendid habit of appearing noble or gentlemanly.
@pwollermanАй бұрын
@@LampoonGoonlike Trump?
@WalterkooyАй бұрын
He is a top diplomat and knows how the game is played. Well done. Master class diplomacy for Blinken and all US ambassadors.
@yzy8638Ай бұрын
@@LampoonGoon act nature westerner: uncivilised act noble westerner: must be evil nothing they do will satisfy you because deep rooted in your mind you hate them
@jerryross9638Ай бұрын
I as a born multi generational New Zealander totally support the Chinese . they are speaking the truth. One of their core policies ,which his the reason they are welcomed in Africa and many other countries round the world , is not to have any interference in another countries internal affairs. the USA and my wife is American are mad and to quote a famous American "to be an enemy of America is dangerous, being a friend is fatal" Kissinger I think. America has interfered in nearly 80 different elections in countries round the world , they have been surrounding Russia and China with military bases ,42 new bases going in in Scandinavia alone,4 in the Philippines under construction to add to the over 700 military bases round the world and you are going to entertain that China with thousands of years of history has only fought outside its borders 3 times ,twice when the Mongols were in charge and they invaded Japan and in the Korean war where gen Macarthy was retired for proposing dropping 20 ,yes twenty nukes on the Chinese border so they helped the north Koreans fight the Americans. ps the president at the time fired (retired) the old senile general on receiving this plan. the only people to interfere in our elections will be America through their many front groups and propaganda that is sent down the pipe like from the major news networks.as far as for genocide, want to see one don't bother looking for one in China look at the American supplied weapons blowing apart Palestinians in Gaza. I know who I prefer. this is not on the American people they have no control with a uniparty in power . their main policies never change much.
@LampoonGoonАй бұрын
CCP troll/bot. More likely a paid troll, given the rotten punctuation.
@wassum100Ай бұрын
@@LampoonGoonthat’s your answer to legitimate points raised eh. CIA bot
@albback8176Ай бұрын
@@LampoonGoonOMG, your slope-headed comment is so shallow that a fish would have to walk to travel from one eyebrow to the other, and the comedic value alone is worth more gold than any troll could hope to stumble across, even by accident...
@WWLooi-js8rlАй бұрын
Seems like there is a factory somewhere that manufactured all these lies against China, and these lies get recycled in the mostly collective West, especially the Anglo-Saxons sphere. Shame on you, New Zealand! I thought you were different from other Anglo-Saxons cos you are more inclusive and learned your history of genocide of Maori people in your country.
@cybonolАй бұрын
@@LampoonGoon yes because paying trolls is productive for the chinese government 💀
@tc-fz5qnАй бұрын
Kudos to the Chinese Ambassador for responding so patiently and gentlemanly to all the questions put to him by the host of this program. The host was obviously trying too hard at times, to "get" the ambassador by pushing aggressively for a particular response he was after. But, the ambassador is able to respond calmly with facts and reason, much to the disappointment of the host. The Xinjiang story has been totally and completely beaten to death and absolutely debunked so many times that its so boring and embarrassing for any interviewer to even bring it up. And to keep pushing the ambassador to mention the name of the country he was referring to that had been and still are interfering into the domestic affairs of EVERY country on the planet including fomenting and actively participating in colour revolutions, conducting illegal invasions of other nations, illegal surveillance including the personal cell phones of heads of states, committing crimes against humanity and other hedious, unmentionable war crimes - merely reveals the host's less than honourable intent and biasness. Congratulations again, to the Chinese Ambassador for standing up to all these nonsense and conducting this interview with such grace and dignity.
@AechPEssАй бұрын
USA too strong 💪. China lose. Sorry 😢
@mikepau1593Ай бұрын
Respect is an imperative, it’s something I observe the Chinese people have, our politicians could a thing or to, by aligning to our cultural identify within the country’s we live.
@LampoonGoonАй бұрын
CCP troll/bot. More likely a paid troll.
@yecart1014Ай бұрын
The conversation shows what a slippery slope the world is on. Support means obey. Warn means if you do we will show you our hand.
@yecart1014Ай бұрын
250000 in Auckland alone are stats nz rigged
@CatoniusАй бұрын
To be America's enemy is dangerous, to be America's ally is fatal.
@dannnsss8034Ай бұрын
China's only official ally - North Korea. America's closest allies, including South Korea.
@henryyong5974Ай бұрын
@@Catonius yea right.
@henryyong5974Ай бұрын
To quote Teng Siou Ping, Those friends of USA are economy rich, and those who are not remine POOR. You want to challenge him !!!????
@yzy8638Ай бұрын
@@henryyong5974 ya sure, saudi is USA friend, USA is friend to dictator that they can extort, while starving neighbor like cuba to death, bombing iraq with lies, killing cambodian just because they so unlucky stand next to US's victim. oh, but european are rich, why not? after 2 century of looting the entire world, it be funny if europe arent rich
@chriswong9158Ай бұрын
Henry Kissinger Quote: “To be an enemy of America can be dangerous, but to be a friend is fatal.” "When two neighboring countries fight each other, just know the USA visited one." - Nelson Mandela
@patriotoverseasАй бұрын
The interviewer reeks of bias and double standard ! He is quick to accuse and interrupt his guest. No manners at all.
@HappyDTАй бұрын
White Boy. What else to expect?
@lmantuano6986Ай бұрын
guy's a m0r0n!
@scalarnaiАй бұрын
The China ambassador is very smart, knowledgeable and diplomatic despite being harassed by interviewer.
@tonigilsenan6320Ай бұрын
That indeed is how reporters should conduct interviews. This ambassador is intelligent enough to respond.
@NamDuong-y7nАй бұрын
@@tonigilsenan6320 interruptions mid-sentence and rapid series of accusations is not reporting. If you want clear facts to answer your questions then you have to listen to the replies and follow-up, not going into tangent talking points.
@shiromaru8236Ай бұрын
Stop asking human right issue. Look at the mirror yourself how Māori were treated. The present government even want to cancel the treaty?
@neilwolff7894Ай бұрын
Double standards are deeply embedded in their essence.
@mirachataseven3709Ай бұрын
And so human right issues are fine in China?
@josephlionellin3004Ай бұрын
They certainly still think that they have the moral high ground to lecture the non-whites or the global South on anything whilst discreetly sweeping their wrong deeds under the carpet. 😂😂😂
@danwelterweight4137Ай бұрын
The last people to ask about human right are Western nations. Do you have any idea what Western Imperialist countries did to the peoples of the Americas, Africa, Middle East, INDIA, South East Asia and China. China removed 850 million of its people out of poverty. Turned what was once one of the poorest countries in the world into the richest country in the world by Purchasing Power parity. When the Communists came to power the average life expectancy of the Chinese people was a meager 36.5 years of age. 80% of the population couldn't read or write. Women were chattel to be owned, bought and sold as property. Many of them had their feet crushed to appease the fetishes of Men. Nevermind the fact that all Chinese major cities were in rubble after years of civil war and a war against genocidal Imperial Japan. Today Chinese people's life expectancy is 78 years of age. Their life expectancy is event higher than the United States. Their infant mortality is lower than the United States. Chinese people 3njoy a better living standards than any other time in their history. There 4x less people in jail in China than there are in the United States per capita. Chinese infrastructure and cities make Western cities look like developing countries Yet you want to tell the Chinese to get rid of the government who has done all of this for them. China's population is 1.47 Billion people. It has 1.6 million people behind bars. The US has a population of 340 million people and it has 1.8 million people behind bars And you want to tell me China is violating the human rights of its people.
@mirachataseven3709Ай бұрын
@@danwelterweight4137 In the past terrible atrocities and injustices were carried out by western nations. My point is not that the West is better than China, my point is just because the West abused human rights in the past, it doesn't mean that China can put innocent Uyghur people in prisons and concentration camps just because of their identity, religion and culture being different to eastern China.
@jaytreeamdaf99Ай бұрын
Man this dude is cool as! Bring him on again man. Sharp fella.
@pouwakaruwhiu8349Ай бұрын
New Zealand don't join AUKUS, you will pay dearly as for America they do things for themselves not for New Zealand Economy. America is not invincible anymore, America only thinks of war the most aggressive ally for centuries, America indigenous people have been fighting American Government for 500 years and they are still fighting for their rights of their land, from Qld 🦘
@jemma_19988Ай бұрын
If us had not set up a base here during ww2 we would be under japan nowadays
@wassum100Ай бұрын
@@jemma_19988not true, very simplistic conclusion
@SocialistStonerАй бұрын
@@jemma_19988 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 bruh just stop.. when you have absolutely zero idea what yorue talking about and just wanna be desperately such an American style bigot....just stop you're a loozer simpng for Amerrikkka
@yzy8638Ай бұрын
@@jemma_19988 UK: if i didnt colonise all you savage still live in uncivilised cave! praise me UK the bringer of civilisation, the mother of culture!
@chriswong9158Ай бұрын
Sample of joining AUKUS Australia's Defence Policy In 2023 - kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZjWoZ6um9CGas0
@stevecooper9896Ай бұрын
No to AUKUS and get off the stage puppet Guyon.
@lmantuano6986Ай бұрын
what kind of m0r0nic parents give a child a name like that..!?!
@brianlowe3529Ай бұрын
Chinese been here since the 1800s . Have they attacked .
@ThriceGr8Ай бұрын
There's a big difference between the Chinese people and the authority who leads the nation... If you don't understand that then you're hopeless
@brianlowe3529Ай бұрын
@@ThriceGr8 like israel you reckon you are hopeless
@brianlowe3529Ай бұрын
@@ThriceGr8 what do you reckon .
@ThriceGr8Ай бұрын
@@brianlowe3529 I didn't say anything about Israel. What are you implying?
@brianlowe3529Ай бұрын
@@ThriceGr8 China been communist since 1949 . Have they attacked. Come on. You got your head in the USA propaganda . Your hope less
@tristanpatterson3843Ай бұрын
It's kind of sad that we have to look to the east to see real diplomats.
@stevebarrett6767Ай бұрын
He is good at his job..massive fail trying to pretend that Taiwanese want to be usurped by China.
@djhemirukahemisphere8893Ай бұрын
Not really
@raoulchristensen5279Ай бұрын
Diplomacy has never been part of the US makeup and why are we aligning ourselves with a country that's inflicting a genocide on the Palestinian people. We've got a PM who claims to be a Christian. He's neoliberal to the core and no to aukus. Our destiny should lie with BRICS.
@yzy8638Ай бұрын
china has been for thousand of years using public exam to pick government officers, while europe at the same time appoint counsins and nephew of kings and queen to do the bidding, its not the first time to look at oriental to find ideas
@LWJCarrollАй бұрын
I wanted to hear what Ambassador had to say with out being talked over. The interviewer still gets to ask questions as a two way discussion. Laurie. 😊
@walking_luggage8105Ай бұрын
The defense budget is usually a portion of a country's GDP. China's defense budget is usually about 1.7% of its GDP and it has not increased. What has increased is China's total GDP because its economy is growing very fast. This is why it "looks like" China's defense budget is increasing while it is actually the same. For example, if your total weath was 100 dollars in the past and you spend 1% of your wealth on food, then that is 1 dollar spent on food. But say this year your wealth increased to 110 dollars and you still spend 1% of your wealth on food, then you are spend one dollar ten cent on food. But this is normal because there is inflation every year. Also I don't like this journalist. Why does he keep interrputing the Chinese ambassador and he doesn't let him finish speaking? Is this how free speech works?
@katejudson8907Ай бұрын
It's really awfully disrespectful to interrupt and pummel with loaded questions like that. I bet if he had a sports legend on there he would be tripping over himself with an apology if he just accidentally interrupted them for a second. So rude.
@WalterkooyАй бұрын
The ambassador answered that question in a masterly diplomatic way.
@nanyanguo1Ай бұрын
just like how medhi hassan interrupted victor Gao. The constant interuptions are nothing more than means to prevent the speaker from telling the truth
@ChuanTehАй бұрын
Defense budget cannot be measured by percentage, the same weapons built by US cost a million while china cost a thousand onlyyyyy what's the different???
@walking_luggage8105Ай бұрын
@@ChuanTeh The national defense budget is ALWAYS measured by percentage of total GDP. The reason being: Relative Economic Burden: Measuring defense spending as a percentage of GDP allows for a comparison of how much a country is investing in defense relative to the size of its economy. This helps assess whether defense spending is in line with a nation's economic capacity. For example, a country with a larger GDP can afford to spend more on defense without overburdening its economy compared to a country with a smaller GDP. International Comparisons: Using GDP as a benchmark allows for easier comparison between countries of different economic sizes. Countries with different levels of economic development can still be compared on the basis of how much they allocate to defense relative to their total economic output. Economic Context: GDP reflects the overall wealth and economic health of a country, so measuring defense spending as a percentage of GDP provides a broader context of the nation's ability to fund its military without detracting excessively from other priorities, like healthcare, education, or infrastructure. Strategic Prioritization: Countries may adjust their defense budgets based on strategic needs and geopolitical circumstances. By measuring it as a percentage of GDP, it becomes easier to monitor if defense spending is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the economy, which can indicate shifting priorities or changes in security concerns. International Norms and Alliances: In some cases, international organizations or defense alliances, such as NATO, encourage countries to allocate a certain percentage of their GDP to defense. For instance, NATO has set a target of 2% of GDP for defense spending among its members. This standard helps maintain a certain level of military readiness and burden-sharing within the alliance. Policy Transparency: Percentage-based measures make it easier for the public, lawmakers, and policymakers to discuss defense spending within the broader context of the national economy. It makes defense spending more understandable and accessible, especially when comparing how much different countries prioritize defense. Also China's weapons are not that cheap. It is not a few thousand bucks vs a few million. The J20 fighter costs about 200 million USD per unit while the F35 costs about 350 million US per unit. The US spends 3 times more than China on weapons becuase the US is buying up offensive weapons that can project power from across the ocean while China is buying defensive weapons to defend China's territories at their front door. It is always more expensive to prepare for an offence than planning for a defence.
@AndyLim0703Ай бұрын
Guyon Espiner is very rude, not professional. Interrupt ambassador all tbe time. The ambassador is cool and professional. Guyon should learn from the ambassador, if not he should just discontinue his program. Shame on you, Guyon.
@SocialistStonerАй бұрын
He's an amerikkkan mouth piece and a bigoted imperialist puppet
@brianwheeldon4643Ай бұрын
Wouldn't it be great if New Zealand were a sovereign and neutral state. (Statement not question). Thank you ambassador for educating NZ mainstream media. In foreign policy matters, we enjoy an msm that lies by omission. My goodness ambassador it's like being interviewed by an irritable child. I apologise on behalf of my fellow New Zealanders.
@ThriceGr8Ай бұрын
You're doing a good job of convincing idiots that the diplomat came across 'victorious' in this interview... Keep the bot farm up champ, earn those 4 USD an hour for the sake of your nation
@shiromaru8236Ай бұрын
Thank you. Well said
@RobertWarman-i9lАй бұрын
Well said
@jasonn5196Ай бұрын
Embarrassing that was broadcast under the RNZ banner, the BS 5am talking points. The lack of respect, culture and general low quality. We can do better.
@renjingtu3611Ай бұрын
Why NZ's security has to rely on US and Europe allies?
@amunra5330Ай бұрын
They want to be part of a white people club.
@gelinrefiraАй бұрын
Haha, the ambassador of a country is not going to reveal the policies of his government in a public interview. Asking the ambassador what China will do with a trump presidency is a useless question. No ambassador is going to limit his government's options by publicly saying this or that without his government explicitly saying that's what they are going to do. Instead of asking these low gain questions, the interviewer should be asking about the ambassador's opinions on the current NZ and China relationship and whether NZ foreign policies actually matches China foreign policies, so we can actually know what China thinks.
@williammar679Ай бұрын
9999😂
@yzy8638Ай бұрын
problem is only normal people wish to understand what others think politician, elites, lapdogs, they dont care what other think
@wassum100Ай бұрын
Guyon failed to compare US spending on their military with China’s! Significant difference
@Alll2017Ай бұрын
Definite NO to joining aukus
@yct6500Ай бұрын
No to Aukus. Nz must stay nuclear free.
@yangxin2232Ай бұрын
It's better that New Zealand focuses on what benefits their people most, rather that simply following US's order. I thought that was commen sense, but it appears not. I don't know why.
@MataHeapsАй бұрын
Well put can we have deeper questions like how can we help achieve our goals of renewable energy together and many others. It's always the same how bad are you questions.
@oilenglai4128Ай бұрын
WANG xiaolong...WELL SAID and ARTICULATED. WE, CHINESE AND DIASPORA AROUND THE WORLD, are proud of your answers and expressions to the western scoffingS. 加 油 王 🇨🇳
@Desyo-wn7ibАй бұрын
Let's see you bring the American ambassador and ask him as aggressively as you asked the Chinese ambassador's, The American ambassador Within 24 hours he will sanction you 😂
@koi-chingchiuАй бұрын
Very proud of the Ambassador of China Wang Xiao-Long.
@WalterkooyАй бұрын
My compliments ambassador Wang. Very diplomatic interview. The US ambassador in China and his boss Blinken should watch it and learn. Next time don’t accept and correct the interviewer if he says CCP. Lecture him.
@wataric1600Ай бұрын
Another rude superiority complex Western interviewer who thinks he is more sophisticated n smarter than any non westerners. SMH
@kennedy6618Ай бұрын
The NZ host needs to learn some etiquette and show respect to his guest! Let your guess talk without interruptions ...such ignorance!
@StephenfromChchАй бұрын
Informative and respectful interview, thank you Guyon Espier and Xiaolong Wang.
@drednorztАй бұрын
I mean, say what you will about Chinese foreign policy, but Xialong is certainly correct about the behaviour of he who must not be named.
@AntonioMargehrettiАй бұрын
Keep on leading by example china 👏
@davidpang7628Ай бұрын
After the usual diplomatic opening remarks, the rest was a 'without fear or favour' interview. Guyon Espiner was not afraid to ask tough questions and the China ambassador Wang Xiaolong responded, likewise, straightforwardly. This dynamics is symptomatic of a maturing relationship. In terms of national interest, New Zealand is less shaped by secuirty threat (when compared with Australia for example) than by its economic vulnerability; it's national interest is strategically placed along the 'price taker - price maker' contiuum.
@douglaswong8610Ай бұрын
60% tariffs is going give Americans no lunch, no dinner
@riceballlegend7757Ай бұрын
It's amazing to me that China invented a new system that is a blend of Socialism and Capitalism. There is still lots of room for improvement on the education of the people, as most rural people aren't leveled up to the modern life yet. But the tremendous progress made over the last 30 years has been remarkable. Great job!
@weileang447Ай бұрын
This host is a total joke when he mentioned Taiwan 😂
@kiwikiwi223Ай бұрын
Id rather be linked with china and brics than us and aukus
@tristanpatterson3843Ай бұрын
Precisely. Biggest market, closest and a long history of trade and travel. As for any human rights issues, shut your mouth until Saudi Arabia and Israel are considered pariahs. Any other way of approaching it is just downright racist.
@drednorztАй бұрын
@@tristanpatterson3843 this ^^^
@kiwikiwi223Ай бұрын
@tristanpatterson3843 sorry I dont understand the last half off your comment?
@stevebarrett6767Ай бұрын
@@kiwikiwi223 not sure if you are a bot or a strange one. You might like to try and justify that with some facts, no rhetoric please.
@tristanpatterson3843Ай бұрын
@@kiwikiwi223 Sorry, badly worded. I meant that all the critics of Chinese humans rights, need to complain as loud about SA and ISRL'S.
@JL88Ай бұрын
Amazing how this host can bring himself to keep interrupting the guest after posing a question! As others have said, there is a vivid show of bias by the interviewer…its so clear the script given by the producers of this show to him is is to push the typical Mainstream Media narrative, to smear the Chinese representative, to try to get a slip out of him, get him to react emotionally and say something that they could in turn declare, “Ah, we told you so! This is who they are!”. It’s pathetic, ugly and does nothing good. Only nefarious objective is to try and build up a library of negative talking points. Maybe this show 30, is receiving some of the funding from the US congress’s budget of $1.6B attributed to the anti-China media campaign? Hopefully for the sake of New Zealanders, they see the bullocks and wake up to the fact that their media and government are working for the interests of the US and not for the sovereignty, independence and benefits of New Zealand and its peoples.
@nanyanguo1Ай бұрын
he was ensuring he wouldnt get fired or demoted
@ddtking7630Ай бұрын
It’s CPC not CCP
@ivanchan1041Ай бұрын
Both are OK!
@ddtking7630Ай бұрын
@@ivanchan1041 yes once you fart from your mouth too often you believe no difference
@@ivanchan1041 No, both are not okay. The CCP is a political party. It was founded in 1921. Today the CCP has almost 100 million members. Anyone can make an application to join the party. The CPC is the name of the government of the People's Republic of China. It was founded in October 1949. You can't make an application to join the CPC. You are either elected; as happens at the 2 lower levels of Congress, or, you are promoted based on performance. There are 9 political parties in China. The CCP is the largest party and forms about 70% of government officials. The remaining 30% of government officials are either members of one of the other 8 parties or they are Independent: have no party affiliations.
@BillKort-xo8njАй бұрын
@@ivanchan1041 No, both are not okay. The CCP is a political party. It was founded in 1921. Today the CCP has almost 100 million members. Anyone can make an application to join the party. The CPC is the name of the government of the People's Republic of China. It was founded in October 1949. You can't make an application to join the CPC. You are either elected; as happens at the 2 lower levels of Congress, or, you are promoted based on performance. There are 9 political parties in China. The CCP is the largest party and forms about 70% of government officials. The remaining 30% of government officials are either members of one of the other 8 parties or they are Independent: have no party affiliations.
@chrislilliannorton1779 күн бұрын
A different opinion from a great many of the more positive comments here... The Ambassador is an astute, highly trained communicator for the mainland Chinese government. He knows how to respond to Guyon's queries with principled, well tested and approved vocabulary to get the talking points across with the correct nuanced emphasis - where required. Good on him for doing an excellent job for the CCP.
@jasonn5196Ай бұрын
Funny how the presenter is so many levels below the other gentleman. Even flaunting his personal bigotry when conveying the gentleman as China and not a person or seperate entity from China the country. We are pathetic. ❤ “That will hurt you won’t it”? “You keep that secret”? How poorly educated are we.
@katejudson8907Ай бұрын
Totally. I couldn't continue watching. This interviewer is so fragile that he has to throw other people's punches.
@Harehona5014Ай бұрын
The NZ govt no longer speaks for the people its full of Australians.
@Time4PeaceАй бұрын
Interviewer: If we treat you as our enemy, would you still buy from us? Ambassdor: Why would you want to treat us as our enemy when we are your friend and your biggest buyers of your goods? Interviewer: Because you treat your people badly? Ambassador: Didn't you realise you were lied to? And we are not even asking Maori Kiwi how they feel and about the genocides against them in the historical past. Andy Boreham (a Kiwi): Here's the lies about Xinjiang kzbin.info/www/bejne/gH-Qg6RonrqMhrs
@mervynpekaАй бұрын
From an economics pov China is the leading capitalist nation too. Socialist capitalism is what they apply.
@russelltan2309Ай бұрын
Guyon Espiner is being provocative. As a journalist he seems to be totally ignorant. Go and read Assange and Pilger, Mr Espiner.
@foobarf8766Ай бұрын
It was worth watching to understand what propaganda about AUKUS sounds like. Being obviously wrong about non proliferation and doctrine since 1989 has no good excuses.
@drednorztАй бұрын
Do you think America wouldn't throw us under the bus as soon as it was beneficial? All we are to them is a convenient place put some of the Five Eyes infrastructure. Just this year the GCSB found unauthorized US software on their servers sending data back to them.
@Time4PeaceАй бұрын
What an irritating interviewer who is not out to clarify but to demonise!
@chriswong9158Ай бұрын
For NZ citizen to view: Australia's (AUKUS) Defense Policy In 2023 - kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZjWoZ6um9CGas0 If New Zealand wishes to join USA AUKUS, so let it be... just remember Australia 2018-2022. China PRC have option. China's policy of non-interference and the defense of sovereignty directive of others.... Today China PRC largest trading partners is ASEAN. New Zealand can partner or not is up to NZ.
@janmcleod6727Ай бұрын
Suggest commentators on Uighur "issues" for Aotearoans use words like "Isis" & "infiltration", when describing the problems China had with terrorism from Xinjiang separatists round 2016. Most adult Kiwis would grasp how serious a problem that would be, for any country. There are documentary videos showing horrific evidence from back then, which our media of course never mentioned.
@donaldtonga7529Ай бұрын
Whole interview is Gaslight.
@yecart1014Ай бұрын
Question related to military spend. Compared to US soldiers what are Chinese soldiers paid as a retainer. Potentially this could actually mean quite abit
@michaelchiang-k2wАй бұрын
The interviewer sucks doesn't know how to conduct a fair n non interruption on someone doing the talk with such rude jabs
@chinkayeok6117Ай бұрын
And when mr wang mentioned that non of the world islamic countries accused China of ill treatment toward Xinjiang, the interviewer suddenly woke up from his slumber. He is so stupid 😱
@serenachen9385Ай бұрын
The host must go to China see by himself he is lost in time😂😂😂
@drewVL1Ай бұрын
This interview is super rude non professional and think he is all above.
@TheGchiuАй бұрын
Why doesn't the ambassador ask why 50% of the prison population is Maori when they only represent 15% of the population? Talk about the kettle calling the pot black.
@Go_Home_British_RajАй бұрын
British Colonials love to pontificate on stolen lands
@lifes_abeach6040Ай бұрын
It is facts😂
@Go_Home_British_RajАй бұрын
@@lifes_abeach6040 It is Foreign British Colonial Systemic Racism to steal Aotearoa
@stevebarrett6767Ай бұрын
@@TheGchiu he might also ask why they commit a disproportionate amount of the offending.
@TheGchiuАй бұрын
@@stevebarrett6767 QED
@bendybruceАй бұрын
NZ is caught between a rock and a hard place. Sooner or later we are going to have to pick a side. The problem is, both of these sides suck but in very different ways. In a purely economic sense however it's a bit of a no brainer. America is on the decline , both economically and politically. It is also a country that has interfered with other sovereign nations to a degree that vastly outstrips any other country on Earth , including China. America's complete disregard for the ICC and its unconditional support for the rogue state of Israel is a clear indication of how it will continue to isolate itself from the rest of the global community.
@skovdzschitt3230Ай бұрын
Fully agree. Given much of the West is in a self-inflicted economic stagnation, constraining alternative approaches in order to maintain the outdated status quo and suffocating social growth and development, I wouldn’t look to the West for solutions. In saying that, China is indeed a tyrant in its own region and much of its expansion reflects America’s colonisation of their island neighbours. so assuming that China’s expansion wouldn’t take the same aggressive bullying position that America has taken in the 20th/21st century would be idiotic. RockNZHardPlace indeed
@bendybruceАй бұрын
@@skovdzschitt3230 I'm glad someone else can see the dilemma we face here. Trump's commitment to tariffs has the potential to wreck havoc to global trade. Furthermore he's filling the White House with a rogue's gallery of Clowns. Aligning ourselves with America is akin to joining the circus. Economically I think the smart play would be not to join AuKUS and to continue to cultivate trade relations with China. My fear however, is that China is very skilled at using economics to exert power over foreign countries. This is a skill I think they learned after the 2008 global financial crisis, and they are very good at it. The ambassador mentioned few if any Muslim nations have complained about human rights violations in China, but I think a big part of that is they can no longer afford to.
@Craig-x7fАй бұрын
Why do we need to pick a side ??? We are at the bottom of the world we should do what's best for NZ only
@stevebarrett6767Ай бұрын
Hey, I could give you a bigger list of Chinese bad behaviour.
@peterelliott2914Ай бұрын
@@Craig-x7f Totally. The guy is just saying that joining AUKUS is picking a side. I would have to agree.
@benjamintaine4476Ай бұрын
China, Russia and Brazil should also create CRS to cover Pacific Ocean and Atlantic Ocean to provide advance military capabilities in case US tries to launch more of their never ending war policy
@henryyong5974Ай бұрын
Being 4th generation ethnic Chinese, my fore parents left their country then known as Ching Dynasty due to hunger, governed by Manturia. ( NOT, China) as people so confused about the difference. Ccp trying hard to telling the world , all ethnic Chinese living outside ( NOW) PRC are supporters of ccp. He is totally wrong. We're NOT a supporters but anti ccp. There's great different in our culture.
@mskmsk7174Ай бұрын
Exactly right my friend. The Chinese people are wonderful, it's the CCP that is the problem. They do not represent the Chinese people.
@04WELLYDEEPАй бұрын
Be careful what you say man you might end up in one of those re education camps lol
@walking_luggage8105Ай бұрын
What kind of Chinese are you? You don't even know your history. What the heck is "Manturia"? And why are you equating the Qing dynasty with the CCP? Do you know any history at all?
@LampoonGoonАй бұрын
@@walking_luggage8105 CCP troll
@walking_luggage8105Ай бұрын
@LampoonGoon you call me ccp troll. I call you cia troll. It all means moot.
@sukieoutdoors7422Ай бұрын
Host ask a question. The Ambassador answers it. Then the host quickly moves on to the next question. Didn't even bother to talk more about the topics lol.
@josephlionellin3004Ай бұрын
This NZ so called Interviewer doesn't seem to look like the BRIGHTEST BULB on the X'Mas tree. Certainly not the best bloke among the rest hailing from the Journalistic fraternity. Naive, inpatient and occasionally a little bit of an irritant as one can describe him. 😂😂😂
@douglaswong8610Ай бұрын
You should be asking what happened to the Maori? Mowing the lawn? Sounds familiar?
@samlim-mg5iqАй бұрын
There is no re education camp at all The interviewer should go there n investigate
@pblakezАй бұрын
very calm and collected till foreign interference then the body language tells
@supergroovy8346Ай бұрын
It is NZ best interest to be closer to China because of geography. But NZ is a province of the US empire so NZ doesn't have much of a choice to do what is best in their interest.
@dunzhenАй бұрын
Ah...pure Australian self righteousness. It's a western thing, not necessarily an Australian thing
@bruceross952127 күн бұрын
In 2023 China spent $13.5 billion dollars on NZ products, the U.S.A. spent $5.79 billion... miserable sods
@AnjanaJain-om1siАй бұрын
3 % of GDP Means 450 to 500 billion dollar that would be defence budget of china according to ambassador of china way more than they officially say to the rest of world.
@WSCEngineeringАй бұрын
The host interrupts Mr. Xiaolong far too much. It is very difficult to absorb what he is communicating very diplomatically while this host is talking so much.
@julianhussenet7633Ай бұрын
Nz media for you. Treat their host like they’re stupid and behave as if they have a superiority complex
@drednorztАй бұрын
Thats the point of Guy Espiners show. To be as critical as possible with the interview, instead of letting the guest glide along on their own talking points. What your describing is a press release. If you prefer that then just listen to CCP statements directly.
@WSCEngineeringАй бұрын
@@drednorzt Ok but the host comes across as a little ADHD with a very short attention span.
@yzy8638Ай бұрын
@@drednorzt to be critical and not let the other to answer properly, than whats the point of inviting the guest, you just being critical and keep critical by yourself, since the other party dont need to convey any point. its like saying a debate with 1 side being mute half the time is being critical to your opponent, westoid just gonna invent new concept like this?
@amanjaya-s9vАй бұрын
Do you believe in free trade? You should ask EU and DT!
@navegantezen5983Ай бұрын
I thought the Inquisition was gone.
@5dsparrow679Ай бұрын
To Chinese living aboard, NZ Alignment with Xi would be a disaster.
@fleurstarableАй бұрын
No idea of Geopolitics
@drednorztАй бұрын
Being a trading partner is not the same as political allegiance.
@brianlowe3529Ай бұрын
Why ?
@jerryross9638Ай бұрын
you are probably not familiar with economics of internation commerce, we would be screwed as a country with tariffs already on many of our few goods we sell to America and tariffs of 20% added to any imported things in America when the new govt comes to power.
@5dsparrow679Ай бұрын
Xi would be happy to use democracies trust to apply global censorship, I was an insider back in China, trust me. 五毛滚开
@samv2777Ай бұрын
India should withdraw from Aukus
@lmantuano6986Ай бұрын
..you mean "The Quad"..?
@linnightl9277Ай бұрын
Started surprisingly cordial then got very prickly. Always veiled threats and indignant avoidance of inconvenient truths from CCP lackeys. Strong interview skills by Guyon Espiner.
@katejudson8907Ай бұрын
Strong? 😂 Fragile more like it.
@paulinearnold4220Ай бұрын
Love China❤❤❤❤
@peterkuppens6060Ай бұрын
There are more Chinese in ew Zealand tan foreigners in china
@yecart1014Ай бұрын
The word support is chucked around alot, but has a sinister ring to it
@3drocketАй бұрын
It's like the way China now supports Hong Kong...
@simonhadfield7691Ай бұрын
I'm enjoying this series.
@Time4PeaceАй бұрын
Why would an ambassador want to be in a program with a hostile and irritating interviewer bent on pushing a propaganda?
@brianlowe3529Ай бұрын
Rewi alley . 🤙
@dragpalhafsang903929 күн бұрын
Interview’s amazing arrogant questions.
@janmcleod6727Ай бұрын
ON PRINCIPLE ! Go read some history...
@jacquelinepayne2012Ай бұрын
Klaus Schwab of the WEF summed it up when he stated that power would move from the West to the East, and he should know.
@bw5095Ай бұрын
There are many little pinks here😂
@katejudson8907Ай бұрын
And a few tired dinosaur McCarthyites. Yawn.
@RobertWarman-i9lАй бұрын
Cheapest butter in hokitika supermarket 8 $ a pound westland dairy company wholly chinese owned and doing a decent job ,but you cant help feel our regions soul is being bled to serve international conglomerates first
@andrewking9435Ай бұрын
What about China ramming Philippine ships in South China sea?
@FattymcstattyMcormick-pv6pjАй бұрын
No need to trade with China, India has a great demand for dairy and beef. And their population is growing.
@lawrance6540Ай бұрын
wtf are you talking about mate, are u joking? have you heard a joke about selling pork to indonesia
@shiromaru8236Ай бұрын
Show me how much have NZ have sold your produce to India? Even from from Australia.
@yzy8638Ай бұрын
@@shiromaru8236 he do sounds sarcastic, hindu dont consume neither dairy or beef, doubt NZ got much to sell
@jimt2762Ай бұрын
@lawrance6540 😂😂😂
@r.1599Ай бұрын
He says they want a peaceful reunification of China, and also that the Taiwanese want this too. The fact that this guy is saying, pretty much, that China is begging for a "peaceful" reunification, means that so far, it's proven harder than they thought because the Taiwanese are _fighting_ them on it. The Taiwanese wouldn't be fighting so hard against it if they really did want to be part of China again. With all due respect to the man, I do not believe anything this man says about anything.
@tristanpatterson3843Ай бұрын
But you believe everything that comes out of the US state dept right?
@brianlowe3529Ай бұрын
That’s your choice . 😂
@paulinearnold4220Ай бұрын
But Taiwan is legally part of China so there is no argument
@stevebarrett6767Ай бұрын
@@tristanpatterson3843there speaks a man with no argument.
@kiwikiwi223Ай бұрын
@stevebarrett6767 even if they did america would make sure it looks like they don't 😂. They need Taiwan for there chips otherwise game over
@3800gracieАй бұрын
Love all the anti-american comments that ignore China's negative actions. All big countries shape their world,, NZ does this as well. The questions for NZ is what vision of the world do we support.
@wassum100Ай бұрын
Well America’s ‘vision’ is protection of the corporate puppet state as opposed to China’s vision of care for their population. Compare the number of homeless in America with the no homeless in China
@susanmorrissey3555Ай бұрын
I didnt like it that China has threatened us about consequences if we join aukus. Bully boys. We are our own country and will decide ourselves thankyou.
@eddyg4742Ай бұрын
It's not bullying. It's like U have always been buying from a local store down the road and Ure their biggest customer. Then the store decides to turn hostile against you. Would you continue to buy heaps from that store ? Especially if there are other options ? It's as simple as that.
@JohnZoetebierАй бұрын
Is NZ joining AUKUS out of free will? Or are they bullied into submission like the EU, Japan, South Korea and Australia?
@katejudson8907Ай бұрын
Actually all AUKUS is is a bully protection racket aimed at China.
@russelltan2309Ай бұрын
But you have been a cozying up with a big bully spying on others? What is the purpose of 5 Eyes? To organise a tea party? What is AUKUS for? Why do you have to surround China with hundreds of military bases? Why are you so provocative by sailing across the Straits of Taiwan? Those waters belong to China. Taiwan is part of China as the Americans have acknowledged it way back in the 1970s under President Nixon. Why do you have to meddle with China's internal affairs? What if China interferes with NZ internal affairs like encouraging Maoris to become more radical or ask Chatham Islanders to split from the rest of NZ? Please use your brains before opening your mouth. Do not let others eat your lunch. many countries are dying to eat NZ lunches.
@rachanasor4248Ай бұрын
stop lie our beautiful world, my grand parents was so suffered ...
@RebelTempleton-KnightАй бұрын
Stop kissing butt, We are our own Country and People...not shadows of others.
@brianlowe3529Ай бұрын
N z prime minister. I am a American political junkie 😂😂. 💋💄
@bentomlin8183Ай бұрын
Firing missles over the pacific? Without collective permission from pacific nations. That says something about how the pacific is regarded. At the end - rights to peacefully exist without discrimination for diaspora. New Zealand is a world leader - so that is rich to hear that from this speaker and a distraction from the issue at hand. In our legal jurisdiction, free speech is protected. Interfering with that undermines NZ sovereignty from NZ perspective. From a CCP perspective it is a legal action to support their nation. But this is our land. We define your interference in free speech here as foreign interference. You may have other definitions but this is our land and jurisdiction and we are sovereign. Our sovereignty is violated by interference in free speech.
@vishalphogat5071Ай бұрын
12:30 India also has NO FIRST USE Nuclear Policy. So it's not JUST China
@andrewking9435Ай бұрын
Why does China want Taiwan so badly?
@jerryross9638Ай бұрын
because they both agree that they are part of China and it is just offshore (not like Hawaii) they just think they (Taiwan) should be the ruling party but as the ka man tong who lost the civil war and went to Taiwan then fought with the native Chinese there till they had killed enough of them to take control, maybe that's why they think it is part of China.
@andrewking9435Ай бұрын
@jerryross9638 yes taiwan was founded by opposition party representing more freedoms and ccp want to crush this like they did with HK
@andrewking9435Ай бұрын
@jerryross9638 i doubt its what the people want as claimed. This was propaganda and lie
@walking_luggage8105Ай бұрын
@@andrewking9435 there has never been a country in the world called Taiwan. But Taiwan is actually called the republic of China. This is not propaganda but a fact. You can find a google image of a passport and see it written on the passport. So it is already a part of China. And the constitution of republic of China claims both Taiwan and the. Mainland china, and it is much larger than the map of the people's republic of China. You do know that, right?
@ThriceGr8Ай бұрын
China wants control of more parts of the ocean which is why they keep expanding their borders into places like the Philippines and Japan. Taiwan is another one of those islands they want control of. With the land comes water supremacy expanded outwards 22km from the island. Artificial islands can be built to claim 22km in radius of water authority.
@buildmotosykletist1987Ай бұрын
Why are Chinese in Aust having to send food parcels to family in China ???
@countofmontecristo9846Ай бұрын
Same as other foreign workers sending money back to their country,not only China, you get the picture
@tinaaroha8205Ай бұрын
No disrespect intended. Wang Xiaolong is not transparent in regards of his accusation who the countries are. And there was a couple of other comments he made I didn't agree on but can't be bothered listening to again.
@jerryross9638Ай бұрын
we all know he meant - - - - - - - - and did not want to publicly name and shame a nation so in a diplomatic way he left it up to us to decide who we think would fit the description . A good way to ask "what we really think is going on?"
@alfredfan2154Ай бұрын
You need to read Chinese history. YOU WILL UNDERSTAND CHINESE PEOPLE. CHINESE understand more about New Zealand than Kiwis about China🇨🇳.
@tinaaroha8205Ай бұрын
@alfredfan2154 Your right, I don't know Chinese history and chose not to. I heard what needed to be heard, I see from what I know of these day's, China is absolutely corrupted as is our Country New Zealand, however not as bad as China as of yet. And history is days of the past, I say this because China isn't what was.
@tinaaroha8205Ай бұрын
@@jerryross9638 something's are best not said if transparency doesn't follow.
@konefesaАй бұрын
I prefer the Chinese relationship then the Americans. Except the human right issues
@nanyanguo128 күн бұрын
you worry about the fabricated human rights issues in China and not the many real human rights issues in amurika itself ?
@leetawhara7103Ай бұрын
Who wants to join a coalition with Trump?
@Go_Home_British_RajАй бұрын
Atlas Network and Evangelical Colonial Luxon
@drednorztАй бұрын
@@Go_Home_British_Raj Damn, I had no idea he was an evangelist. That explains quite a bit...
@JamesClark-cg1qkАй бұрын
We are aligned with countries who share our values. That excludes China.
@susanmorrissey3555Ай бұрын
hopefully no one will join with trump. But then we shouldn't bow down to China either