PRIVITY OF CONTRACT | STRANGER TO A CONTRACT CANNOT SUE | WITH CASE LAWS (Contract Act 1872)

  Рет қаралды 12,114

Ratika Gupta

Ratika Gupta

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 31
@Ravinarayansatya
@Ravinarayansatya Жыл бұрын
😊 good communication about law best teaching and explaination skills about Topic👍👌💝
@psychologymyths4329
@psychologymyths4329 Жыл бұрын
no no no no
@Anjali_Tamrakar
@Anjali_Tamrakar Жыл бұрын
Good explanation ❤️
@itsdark3061
@itsdark3061 Жыл бұрын
Best teacher😁. Mam a query that in case law naryani devi v tagore if narayani devi did not know about the contract between his husband and tagore then what we be the answer
@legalknowledge1...
@legalknowledge1... Жыл бұрын
Mam you explained very simple manner thanku
@aryanrathore9902
@aryanrathore9902 2 жыл бұрын
Very helpful video ma'am, Thanks 🤟
@rohitritti6072
@rohitritti6072 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for sharing these information 🙏🙏🙏🙏
@janhvitripathi7744
@janhvitripathi7744 Жыл бұрын
Maam can you upload revision vedios of the full subjective in 2 3 vedios for quick revision? I actually learn from watching ur Videos Only they are so helpful
@nainabhargava6703
@nainabhargava6703 7 ай бұрын
Thankyou so much for your efforts, but you are using the word agreement and the contract subsequently sometime.
@rupenzeljoe7246
@rupenzeljoe7246 2 жыл бұрын
Ma'am please start IPC series too pleaseee
@nithyanandanand6432
@nithyanandanand6432 Жыл бұрын
Nice explanation
@unnatikhandelwal4414
@unnatikhandelwal4414 Жыл бұрын
Great
@ishikagoyal8450
@ishikagoyal8450 Жыл бұрын
Can we use chinnaya v. Ramaya case in 1st exception of privity of contract ??
@utkarshmishra4637
@utkarshmishra4637 Жыл бұрын
Thank you mam
@abhishekroy3409
@abhishekroy3409 Жыл бұрын
Thank You Ma'am
@Mr_cinema101
@Mr_cinema101 Жыл бұрын
👍 thanks ma'am
@shantythakur758
@shantythakur758 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you mam🙏🙏
@jiassingh7521
@jiassingh7521 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much
@sayedabushra3176
@sayedabushra3176 Жыл бұрын
Mam second case 1912 m hua
@shalinitaank9903
@shalinitaank9903 2 жыл бұрын
Mam ,re u on Linked in??
@shrutijha3488
@shrutijha3488 2 жыл бұрын
U r fab mam♥️
@piyushpandit2665
@piyushpandit2665 2 жыл бұрын
Mam how to emprove law english ? Please guide me 🙏
@amanpreetkaur1325
@amanpreetkaur1325 3 жыл бұрын
Hie dear pls guide me dat i have done Ms.IT and now mujhe law main intrsest hai pls ap bta sakte ho kitne time ka couse hoga n kaise process hoga pls
@RatikaGupta
@RatikaGupta 3 жыл бұрын
Hey Since you are done with your graduation, the LLB course is of 3 years and in order to get an admission into this course you have to appear for Law entrance.
@pariwishmemon6636
@pariwishmemon6636 Жыл бұрын
​@@RatikaGupta i am from pakistan i watch your videos they are really informative, can you please make videos on crpc and cpc
@Duskyskinlipsticks
@Duskyskinlipsticks Жыл бұрын
@RatikaGupta so the privity of consideration is not applicable in India but the privity of contract is applicable??? Please solve the doubt
@shanuaggarwal7317
@shanuaggarwal7317 3 жыл бұрын
✌️
@Axhar_111
@Axhar_111 2 жыл бұрын
Ma'am, you are good teacher tho the content on your channel is limited and unorganized. Please stick to one course for a while make playlist for that. For ex make a playlist for 5 acts with subject to ca foundation there are huge requirement of Law for ca foundation, everyone is teaching in vague manner to sell their course indirectly, they make incomplete playlists to confuse us and then after 15 videos they start asking for money tho they have started the course for free...
@niyati9645
@niyati9645 3 жыл бұрын
Please share Hussaini begum vs khwaja mohommad case law
@RatikaGupta
@RatikaGupta 3 жыл бұрын
Khwaja Muhammad Khan vs Husaini Begum 1910 Facts: There was an agreement between a boy's father and a girl's father that if the girl married his son then he would pay certain personal allowance to the girl. Subsequently, the girl married to his son but he failed to pay her the allowance as promised. The girl then sued him to claim the allowance. But the defendant (boy's father) contended that she being a stranger to a Contract cannot sue and that his (boy's father) contract was only with the girl's father. Held: The girl was entitled to claim the same as a beneficiary. This case Law is basically covered under exceptions (Under a trust, beneficiary can sue) to Privity of Contract.
@skionsgerald1369
@skionsgerald1369 2 жыл бұрын
Please explain in English
Privity of Contract | Indian Contract Act, 1872 | Law Guru
12:12
Law Guru Anurag Rishi
Рет қаралды 109 М.
Ouch.. 🤕⚽️
00:25
Celine Dept
Рет қаралды 26 МЛН
Osman Kalyoncu Sonu Üzücü Saddest Videos Dream Engine 262 #shorts
00:20
Хасанның өзі эфирге шықты! “Қылмыстық топқа қатысым жоқ” дейді. Талғарда не болды? Халық сене ме?
09:25
Демократиялы Қазақстан / Демократический Казахстан
Рет қаралды 352 М.
5 Important Cases of Indian Contract Act 1872 | Part 1
11:41
Priya Jain
Рет қаралды 839 М.
Breach and Frustration of Contract
12:26
YG Law
Рет қаралды 118 М.
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K Review, It's A Mess.... Probably A Flop
38:23
Hardware Unboxed
Рет қаралды 172 М.
Doctrine of Privity | Exceptions | LLBx | Indian Contract Act Lecture 7 |  | Case Law
15:42
E06 Entrepreneurial Adventures and Bilingual Learning: 🎨 The Colorful Journey of a Digital Nomad!
48:04
Spanish Educational Solutions | Karim Morato
Рет қаралды 23