Wow it is almost as if he is being paid by Gaijin to sponsor their game !
@TADAMAT-CZ3 жыл бұрын
Its basically a faster T-72B3 with slightly better armor
@stilpa13 жыл бұрын
It has worse base armour, and far worse turret armour. It has better speed. And better era. That is it.
@AverageWarCrimeEnjoyer3 жыл бұрын
@@stilpa1 Wrong. T 80BVM is based on t 80U hull and late production T 80BV turret, which is almost identical to T 80U
@tomk37323 жыл бұрын
T-72B armor is far better then in T-72A (aka T-72M1) and T-80 turret / other armor is same as on T-72A. Thus T-72B is better armored then T-80. Thus upgrades to T-72B make more sense.
@nemisous833 жыл бұрын
@@tomk3732 not even close T-80B uses an improved version of Composite K where as T-72A uses "Dolly Parton" composite K is better than Dolly Parton but a tad bit worse than "Super Dolly Parton" used on T-72B regardless you are talking about a difference in protection of about 50mm maximum which largely insignificant. That plus T-80BVM uses relikt where as B3 uses K-5.
@tomk37323 жыл бұрын
@@nemisous83 Video shows exactly same quartz as in T-72A and exactly same texolite as in T-72A. T-72A was designed before ERA was standard. Thus the emphasis of it was against both Kinetic and HEAT. T-72B mod 85 and later mod 89 had ERA as standard, first one Kontakt-1 and later one Kontakt-5. Thus their armor outside of ERA was strictly against kinetic and there was no textolite or no kwartz present. Are you saying video is wrong and T-80 this mod is based on had different armor?
@danny27173 жыл бұрын
The problem is arjun, it’s too strong against all MBTs.
@mrrexychomp98293 жыл бұрын
@The Chief Musician of the Gods a brief history of Cuba? are you a bot
@a.m.armstrong83543 жыл бұрын
My thoughts entirely..
@mochiisntbad67623 жыл бұрын
Bullshit Arjun just screams second place, bob semple is where its at
@Xcelcior67803 жыл бұрын
No Arjun Tank Can Destroy A Black Hole Dont Underestimate It🤪
@mrrexychomp98293 жыл бұрын
@@Xcelcior6780 the Bob semple tank could destroy this universe and travel onto the next
@airbus_32093 жыл бұрын
I love how this thing just got added to War Thunder yesterday
@sampanyofella58323 жыл бұрын
Yeah they sponsor him. Pretty neat that we get to learn about the irl tank then play it in a game. ...well after you've played for 60 hours to grind the 1 tank out...
@killthemall553 жыл бұрын
@@sampanyofella5832 grinded it in 4 hours lol. Provided, i received 250k rp from module bonuses
@sampanyofella58323 жыл бұрын
@@killthemall55 oh that makes sense. I should stop spading things in that case :P
@jamegumb72983 жыл бұрын
@@sampanyofella5832 I wish I could do it in just 60 hours.
@TheArcticFoxxo3 жыл бұрын
Goodbye 3BM42M... Hello 3BM46
@artdains3 жыл бұрын
Russia's wasting time upgrading their tanks. They should just order Arjun and become unstoppable.
@milfshake69443 жыл бұрын
Haha!
@sneakycactus88153 жыл бұрын
LMFAO
@GTBANNA3 жыл бұрын
Right!
@bintangabdullah19493 жыл бұрын
hahahahhahahahahhaha
@hospitaller1003 жыл бұрын
Is arjun the new meme? lmao
@neki2033 жыл бұрын
It wasnt meant to be a perfect mbt. This thing can start its engine at - 50 degrees in cold arctic winter
@srelma3 жыл бұрын
Is Russia expecting the next Napoleon/Hitler to show up at Moscow's doorstep in the middle of winter?
@neki2033 жыл бұрын
@@srelma they have T 14s and T 90s for that
@csme073 жыл бұрын
@@neki203 and the T72 B3
@radonsider96923 жыл бұрын
@@srelma nope. They guard the extreme cold parts of their country. (Not Moscow or Western parts)
@spamstabber3 жыл бұрын
@@srelma T-80s are used to defend their assets in the arctic because of their ability to operate in extreme cold. That is pretty much the only thing they are used for.
@shinchan-F-urmom3 жыл бұрын
I won't play war thunder until the mighty undefeatable 10th generation Arjun tank comes
@FactsInto3 жыл бұрын
lollllllllllll
@t-90atank353 жыл бұрын
Arjun is, supeeehr!
@HOVX.6123 жыл бұрын
It is over power , so sadly they won't add it 😔😔😔😔
@FactsInto3 жыл бұрын
@@HOVX.612 arjun is the one tank that can fill all the task, you can drop it in Ocean to kill submarines, it can shoot down satellites flying in space, it can even stop ICBMs, and ofcourse destroy all tanks in the world
@HOVX.6123 жыл бұрын
@@FactsInto 😂😂 when it aim on the target , it get destroyed
@Aaron-hk6st2 жыл бұрын
I'm glad to see that the Soviets kept the "TURRET EJECT" feature in their new line of tanks. It's been a popular, sought after feature since WW2. An ageless classic!
@lostvayne1042 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@james-im1sj2 жыл бұрын
Is anyone else using that design
@Aaron-hk6st2 жыл бұрын
@@james-im1sj Only the ones using the same reload system.
@ytkomar11412 жыл бұрын
@@james-im1sj Leopards also has this option.
@NKVD_Enjoyer2 жыл бұрын
Is that a bad joke?
@MikoyanGurevichMiG213 жыл бұрын
The poor T-80U's just crying out of neglect, wondering why the Ukrainians made the Oplot while papa Putin's friendzoned him for an inferior variant or the T-72 fam.
@dankerxd41083 жыл бұрын
Why dont they just get rid of the T-80s and make more T-90M
@johngezon12203 жыл бұрын
@@dankerxd4108 This is the real question. My only thought is perhaps they are keeping gas turbine around for artic opps where it may have an advantage vs tradition diesel but I can confirm none of it. Could be a political reason as well.
@jakub04473 жыл бұрын
@@johngezon1220 iirc they are indeed meant to be used in arctic regions where diesel engines do not perform so well. Then it kinda makes sense to have turbine powered tanks to guard these territories
@Silver_Prussian3 жыл бұрын
@@johngezon1220 t 80 is probably the best tank for the cold, if any foreign power tries to invade from the east which would be suicide and its not likely that anyone would go to siberia
@Silver_Prussian3 жыл бұрын
@Prince Harambe one man sead you destroy russia, you destroy the world, preaty sure its been made clear the russia can not be tamed but keep dreaming
@big_comrade3 жыл бұрын
Really wish they’d added T-80UE-1 or T-80UD instead of T-80BVM. But at least it still have the 1985 UFP. Edit for capitalization
@yosawin30183 жыл бұрын
Sadly the producer,(Omsktransmash,I think) went bankrupt(due to the decision to fund other company and Russia had bad time after the fall of USSR), otherwise Russia may come up with better tanks,since they did have some interesting projects.
@big_comrade3 жыл бұрын
@@yosawin3018 yes they were bought by the company that produces T-72 and T-90 so the company still exists. Believe Red said in previous video that they made T-80BVM to milk money out of the modernizing the tanks instead of creating something truly effective.
@raff2573 жыл бұрын
@@yosawin3018 yeah if Uralvagonzavod had the budget like General Dynamics they definitely gonna make some futuristic tanks
@Eire_Aontaithe3 жыл бұрын
What about the T-80 U-M1 ? Would be a good addition too, I guess...
@matthiuskoenig33783 жыл бұрын
@@yosawin3018 UVZ had some good designs too, look at the object 187 for example, mutch better than the T-90. but the T-90 (object 188) got built instead due to late/post-ussr budgets
@utaMAN123453 жыл бұрын
there is a tsunami of T-80BVM in War Thunder rn, great timing RedEffect
@tetsuoironman99272 жыл бұрын
They have this problem of suddenly exploding after crossing into Ukraine. Really strange, the Russians should probably try and solve this asap. Someone told me that putting the tank in reverse might alleviate the problem though.
@joeking56792 жыл бұрын
This comment will look very stupid in about 2 weeks
@mrwong85842 жыл бұрын
@@joeking5679 why?
@TheStephaneAdam2 жыл бұрын
@@mrwong8584 He's a Russian shill, pay him no mind.
@mrwong85842 жыл бұрын
@@TheStephaneAdam so true..lol
@ddandymann2 жыл бұрын
@@joeking5679 And I'm sure you were saying exactly the same thing two weeks ago.
@user-fn6ct6zb7h3 жыл бұрын
They announced that all T-80U will be upgraded to BVM and they will improve firepower, armor and optics. I think that it has potential to become pretty neat tank.
@srbijairossiya30432 жыл бұрын
isn't it than t80uvm?
@redemissarium Жыл бұрын
@@srbijairossiya3043 more like T-80UM3
@arstotzka908811 ай бұрын
Already announced, not only that, it's getting the Burlak turret, with the ammo carasoul being moved into the rear turret, laser warning and hard/soft kill systems, advanced infared and thermal optics etc.
@jeremyellis43022 жыл бұрын
The biggest problem I see now, it's not protective AT ALL against NLAWS and Javelins. Those launchers are making scrap out of any russian tanks
@adrianotaylor72302 жыл бұрын
Put an abrams or challenger 2 or even a leopard 2 a7+ against russian kornet and you would get the same result
@misterputin88982 жыл бұрын
@@adrianotaylor7230 Maybe they will survive because NATO invest more in APS kits for their tanks while the russians just put a Wannabe Cage on top of their rusty soviet era tanks my dear Russian Bot :D
@youraveragehumanperson2192 жыл бұрын
@@misterputin8898 sorry kiddo; a kornet flying a bit above the tracks would like to say hello to the tank crew OH also you can just switch aim up to the turret upon that missile getting close enough (and trained operators do that)
@chilliobones53482 жыл бұрын
Well multiple RPGs used to wreck western tanks as well and they're much cheaper to produce and carry
@adrianotaylor72302 жыл бұрын
@@misterputin8898 you mean the aps that yall buy from israel russian tanks had aps since the 90s t90 shorta system
@purplenurp55902 жыл бұрын
Man its funny seeing these things abandoned due to running out of fuel in Ukraine
@jds62062 жыл бұрын
Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
@Charliee_Woofy_Pz2 жыл бұрын
Ukrainian farmers: hippity hopity this tank is now my property.
@martinbaldwin19062 жыл бұрын
Before the invasion and on the training, crews have been selling their diesel. That really was happening..
@Charliee_Woofy_Pz2 жыл бұрын
@@TonyBustaroni cope,
@zagreus57732 жыл бұрын
@@TonyBustaroni How did conquering Kiev go for you guys?
@moroman94463 жыл бұрын
Red: talking about T80BVM Comment section: Arjun meme🤣
@knight24252 жыл бұрын
Think the world is seeing how poor this tank is at the moment, I wouldn’t like to be using one if I was in a war
@tanner11112 жыл бұрын
Just goes to show how obsolete tanks are on the modern battlefield. A infantry fired missile launcher can completely obliterate a 2 million dollar machine.
@Nikowalker0072 жыл бұрын
@@tanner1111 True , Javelins and atgm Hellfire equipped Drones made tanks pretty much obsolete
@knight24252 жыл бұрын
@@guyintenn yeah but they are still useful to cowards that like sending them in against civilians
@rxzesereniti97502 жыл бұрын
@@guyintenn not true if you pay attention Russia is sending its tank columns with no infantry support snd no sir support either, obviously your tanks will die in mass if you don’t cover there weaknesses.
@aaroncabatingan52382 жыл бұрын
@@tanner1111 Its not just about the quality of the tanks. Its also the quality of the tactics Russia is using, or rather the lack of tactics. Common sense and lessons learned from a hundred years ago suggests that tanks shouldn't be moving on their own towards a known fortified position. They should at least have infantry on their flanks or ahead of the tanks. Maybe have air support to keep their enemies heads down. But that's not what they're doing. They're Zerg rushing the Ukrainians with tanks with no close air support which gets them ambushed and annihilated. What's worse? They invaded in spring, which transformed the countryside into mud. Giving the Ukrainians an easy time setting up ambushes. If Ukraine have a more powerful air force they would destroy the Russian army in a matter of weeks and liberate Belarus in a month(because why not?).
@LtNomad120mm3 жыл бұрын
That two-piece ammunition at 0:27 looks like it can start an another sepoy rebellion.
@amadeokomnenus14143 жыл бұрын
Haha nice reference
@KleinerGrenadier3 жыл бұрын
Coincident? No way warthunder is on you
@Eire_Aontaithe3 жыл бұрын
He already got sponsored by War Thunder a thousand times, just use your brain bruv.
@KleinerGrenadier3 жыл бұрын
@@Eire_Aontaithe wosh
@justapanzercrewmanwithwifi10703 жыл бұрын
stinky redditor
@KleinerGrenadier3 жыл бұрын
@@justapanzercrewmanwithwifi1070 actually i shower every day, also between my asscheeks 👀
@saint_alucardwarthunder7593 жыл бұрын
@@KleinerGrenadier that's good to know, mate. Amazing intel.
@JustLiesNOR2 жыл бұрын
Allegedly (based on footage from abandoned/destroyed tanks in Ukraine) the bagged add on armor pouches on the sides are cardboard filled on at least some of the tanks... I guess someone embezzled the funds before they managed to buy ERA inserts?
@Factao2 жыл бұрын
It's proud Russian cardboard! How dare you imply it is not the best possible type of reactive armor.
@Shaun_Jones2 жыл бұрын
I’ve heard that it’s the fiberglass spacers that hold the explosives in place. So yea, probably embezzled unless the theory about the explosives being taken out for training purposes and then the invasion order coming in turns out to be true.
@VladRadu-tq1pg2 жыл бұрын
@@Factao this. Russian bots have a response for every misserable fail of their army and dictator, it's all plan of a masterplan..the big masterplan to flaunt your nukes since otherwise your army is hot garbage.
@arturturkevych38162 жыл бұрын
@@Shaun_Jones there are reports that they have cardboard filled in bullet proof vests and some old Soviet steel helmets have covers to make them look like modern tactical ones. The worst are their medical supplies. I've seen videos of their med kits and the bandages have been from 1970s
@Bustermachine2 жыл бұрын
@@Shaun_Jones Yeah, explosives age out, and even if a tank is hit, most of the ERA charges would not be triggered. So it probably makes sense for the innards to be replaceable. That said, the Russians clearly didn't replace them.
@mikhailv67tv2 жыл бұрын
I cannot wait unit we see a Ukrainian farmer and his friends joy ridding in an Armata T14
@jetseat2 жыл бұрын
Thats a real tracker pull contest....hahaha
@georgebonanza94872 жыл бұрын
What about Chechen Kadyrovites driving T-84s?
@cossack76792 жыл бұрын
@@georgebonanza9487 doesn’t happen
@yuricuber62122 жыл бұрын
@@cossack7679 because T-84s have been destroyed
@T33K3SS3LCH3N2 жыл бұрын
That would require Russia to be able to both produce T-14 and bring them to the front line xD
@matthewmcghee71802 жыл бұрын
the main problem is it tends to explode when hit by javelins or NLAWs.
@niimoo7672 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣
@TB-zf7we2 жыл бұрын
Bad Russian design habit of having ammo stored amongst the crew area.
@shakeypudding65632 жыл бұрын
Or panzerfaust3’s 😃
@Bababoy69692 жыл бұрын
Russia captured over 2000 javelin and nlaws btw also destroyed 1300 tanks
@TheDrummingWarrior2 жыл бұрын
@@Bababoy6969 Ukraine doesn’t even have that many tanks but nice try Ivan
@marty21292 жыл бұрын
This aged well... Though I suppose T-80BVM isn't that bad... as a farm tractor. :D
@mrMen-mo2kg Жыл бұрын
M1A2 barn
@hasnicktir5310 Жыл бұрын
@@mrMen-mo2kg Leopard combine
@mrMen-mo2kg Жыл бұрын
@@hasnicktir5310 )))
@Flankymanga3 жыл бұрын
Author forgot to mention the context in which Russians decided to upgrade old T-80 BV design into BVM model. T-80 BVM is a model meant for Arctic troops. Thanks to the gas turbine engine and comparatively light weight it is able to pass through deep snow terrain with ease,. Snow also means that enemy vehicles are easy to spot in IR and LLTV channels. Meaning you don't need superb optics to spot a typical US woodland camouflaged M1 against white background. This is even less of a problem since no other army in the world has arctic troops with fielded tank corps. Not even Canada... So in a region where no enemy armor is expected to operate in a nearby future T-80 BVM has pretty damn good characteristics...
@myopicthunder2 жыл бұрын
all these pseudo expert channels leave out the most relevant pieces of information.
@Flankymanga2 жыл бұрын
@@myopicthunder yes and i have probably left some as well. We are not experts. I don't intend to sound like one. I just hate when i see a video lambasting a experts decision....
@NocKme2 жыл бұрын
@EndGameYTcaptain there plenty of examples of stupid designs that gone into production just because everyone was afraid to speak out. Tu22 for example
@NocKme2 жыл бұрын
Are they going to use it against polar bears? Because no sane military would open a front in Arctic regions. Oh yes Mr. Brown you must be a genius! Lets deploy our paratroopers Novaya Zemlya hundreds of miles away from well anything and have them survive on snow. Those Russians won't know what hit them. Literally.
@99hockeynhl2 жыл бұрын
To be fair all canadian soldiers have extreme cold weather training. Not to mention in the arctic canada relies mostly on light infantry for the reasons you mentioned. Im not sure what sure what portion of the us army has ecw training but I bet its nowhere near 100%
@josephahner30313 жыл бұрын
So, the questions that need asking here are: What is the Russian Ground Forces' strategic intent for this vehicle? and Where will it be deployed and against what? The Russian Ground Forces' statements on T-80BVM show that it is intended for service in the Arctic and Siberia. Two places where they will not likely be fighting against top of the line tanks with advanced passive thermal sights. The reason why the T-80BVM didn't get a fancy Commanders Thermal Viewer or Battlefield Management systems is quite simply because they don't need them. They did need the ERA upgrade because shaped charge warheads are a major threat no matter where you go. Why no APS idk, probably can't afford it for 3k tanks intended for deployment in secondary theatres. Thing is with the armor and FCS upgrades the T-80BVM are solid vehicles. They can receive further upgrades if a war does break out relatively quickly but won't be completely outmatched should they be pressed into service in a frontline role before receiving the extra goodies.
@CrowColdblade3 жыл бұрын
Same stratedgy as always, enter tank, drive into enemy terretory, refuse to leave tank, gets taken out by a dude running around with sandals and a wool shirt. Rince and repeat untill the devision is gone, then declare victory because eho would even check?
@MikoyanGurevichMiG213 жыл бұрын
@@CrowColdblade the T-80BVM is still probably possessed by ghosts of tank crews who were roasted by Chechen ATGMs for this reason.
@docvolt52142 жыл бұрын
@@CrowColdblade that aged well
@rayotoxi15093 жыл бұрын
hmm War thunder adding t80BVM and red effect making a video about t80bvm You were the one how told gaijin to add the t80bvm Pls tell them to add t90m next patch xD
@jacklarkson45053 жыл бұрын
i want l2 a7.
@radonsider96923 жыл бұрын
Make----> Abrooms SEPV2, Leo2A7, T-90M, Chally TES, Type 10, Ztz 99A and Leclerc (revisited)
@hibojoe14773 жыл бұрын
@@radonsider9692 isn’t the challenger 2 2f a challenger 2 tes with a different name?
@schnitzel03303 жыл бұрын
@@radonsider9692 M1A2 Abrams is strong enough, Leo 2A6 is still overpowered, T-80BVM still is inferior against both mentioned tanks, the only tank to be really added from the list is T-90M. Type 10 and Ztz 99 can be debated.
@heliogonzalezsanchez82273 жыл бұрын
@@schnitzel0330 and Leclerc XXI or the Scorpion variant
@cardboard_shaft2 жыл бұрын
Been seeing a lot of these destroyed in Ukraine lately. Was the armor just incredibly subpar?
@mbtenjoyer94872 жыл бұрын
There not destructible you id iot It took 2 javelin to take them down That’s how good they are
@RushZ3r2 жыл бұрын
@@mbtenjoyer9487 Wait fr? Where did you get the info it took them 2?
@mbtenjoyer94872 жыл бұрын
@@RushZ3r a t-72b3 2016 with roof cage armour Was shown taking 1 hit n surviving And got destroyed by the second hit
@icysaracen30542 жыл бұрын
To be fair, there were Shia militias knocking out M1A1 tanks with multiple RPGs
@cardboard_shaft2 жыл бұрын
@@mbtenjoyer9487 lmfao yeah dude “id iot”
@JF-xq6fr2 жыл бұрын
They seem rather lacking... Especially the turret when they roll into Ukraine.
@redbeard39232 жыл бұрын
Hahaha giant frying pans
@savejeff152 жыл бұрын
Javelin has entered the chat
@grahamfloyd34512 жыл бұрын
March 2022: Which is the worst modern Russian tank? Yes.
@apiFerrari2 жыл бұрын
Putin doesnt like your comment 🤣
@jds62062 жыл бұрын
The T-80 is a "Kluge" of old technology, still missing certain absolute necessities on a modern MBT. Ukraine is proving it's an easy victory using a top-attack ATM.
@Triggernlfrl2 жыл бұрын
NATO's thugs in Ukraine you mean.
@remydaitch98152 жыл бұрын
Urkaine will fail
@asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw87912 жыл бұрын
@@remydaitch9815 Shouldn't you be spending your monthly salary on a loaf of bread?
@Fantax922 жыл бұрын
@@asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791 I love your reply haha
@remydaitch98152 жыл бұрын
@@asdsdjfasdjxajiosdqw8791 Urkaine will fail
@ralphchamp75332 жыл бұрын
The problem with all Russian tanks are their allergic to the US Javelin
@ddandymann2 жыл бұрын
And the NLAW, although they seem to get on quite well with Ukrainian tractors.
@NKVD_Enjoyer2 жыл бұрын
🤡
@hex69703 жыл бұрын
I should mention something you got wrong, or didnt mention. The T-80BVM's hull isnt that of the T-80B/BV, its actually the hull of the T-80U. Therefore, it has the same hull composite array as the T-80U which is much stronger than the T-80Bs. This stronger armor array of the UFP, coupled with the Relikt, actually would suggest the Hull armor might be slightly better/stronger than the turret (Minus the drivers port, of course).
@nicolas80983 жыл бұрын
"The T-80BVM's hull isnt that of the T-80B/BV, its actually the hull of the T-80U." what's your source lmao
@TheArklyte Жыл бұрын
It's not. It's T-80BV. 1)Russia has much more T-80B and T-80BV then T-80U; 2)you can't just replace the type of armor package T-80 uses without cutting down the whole tank to pieces. So T-80BV will continue to have armor package of T-80BV. The infamous "boob window" of T-64/72/80/90 is NOT just driver port. It's a significant portion of armor right in front of it since the cutoff is made vertically, meaning that while cutoff in external steel plate is rather small, there are significant areas where several layers or even the whole of "composite pie" are missing. Combined, it seems like you're either spouting nonsense that can be proven wrong with basic common sense and knowledge about these tanks OR(more likely) deliberately trying to spread misinformation. Feel free to provide your sources OR tell me where my logic wasn't spot on:P
@philipped.r.6385 Жыл бұрын
There would be no sense of removing T-80B turrets and putting them on T-80U hulls since the later has much better base turret armor than the B. The T-80BVMs are just T-80BV being given a deep modernisation because they have a significant number in storage.
@zvexevz Жыл бұрын
Man why does this blatant lie have so many upvotes...
@oriontheraptor81192 жыл бұрын
Who will win T80 or guided rocket powered bomb stick
@fabio61702 жыл бұрын
This video aged well
@christianpatton93643 жыл бұрын
The conclusion I draw from your videos is that all tanks are vulnerable from the sides/rear/above with handheld anti tank weapons. The only viable solution being the very best active protection systems.
@yelectric18933 жыл бұрын
Soon™️
@emilsinclair41903 жыл бұрын
Well the best solution is to not get in a situation where someone shoots at your tank.
@enriqueouro93 жыл бұрын
Not if they have side era, also side turret armour is usually decent
@jds62062 жыл бұрын
NLAW and Javelin defeat active protection systems.
@blufoxful2 жыл бұрын
This tank didn't age well against Javelin and NLAW in Ukraine.
@goldman65062 жыл бұрын
A javelin would destroy an Abrams quite easily.Not sure if a NLAW would.probably.But honestly tanks are like battleships anymore in my opinion.Expensive and outdated.
@NKVD_Enjoyer2 жыл бұрын
Okraine still lost more.
@CH3TN1K3133 жыл бұрын
I think Russia didn't waste money on developing a RWS & CITS on the T-80BVM since we are now finding out that they are dumping money developing the "Burlak" turret which they plan on mounting on the T-72, T-80, and T-90 tanks, fixing almost every issue they have which most importantly solves the issue with APDFS length limitations of the carousel autoloader, replacing it with a bustle type. I would be more worried about the drive-train, and upgrading the transmission to an auto.
@_b_x_b_10633 жыл бұрын
Бурлак давно отменили, это неудачный проект
@juadwhite13913 жыл бұрын
@CH Russia should seek help from India to implement Arjun technology in its future tanks.
@saint_alucardwarthunder7593 жыл бұрын
@@CH3TN1K313 а есть пруфы поубедительнее просочившихся фоток? Потому как помимо них по бурлаковским башням никакого апдэйта не было.
@MonMalthias3 жыл бұрын
Burlak is a dead project. The manufacturer Omsk is basically dead at this point with most of its military arm and design expertise folded into UralVagonZavod, if not sold off entirely. Nowadays it makes washing machines. I think it extremely unlikely that UVZ will be using anything from Omsk which had a history of unrealistic project costing and engineering specifications. All it would take is UVZ taking one hard look at the blueprints to most likely find many problems.
@CH3TN1K3133 жыл бұрын
@@MonMalthias UVZ is exactly who is continuing the project. Look at the pics that leaked a few months ago compared to the one's leaked in the 2010's. The design of the turret has been altered, featuring a cover over the protruding ERA blocks which is clearly shown in the pics, what looks like a RWS under the tarp, as well as ERA mounted to the sides of the turret which looks like the Relikt blocks on the side of T-90M Proryv & newer T-80BVM turrets. These differences all seem to be made in the last few years, considering the time frame when they were introduced on the T-90M & T-80BVM, which dispels the idea that this new pic of the Burlak is "the old, abandoned project".
@junebug84852 жыл бұрын
all of this to be turned into scrap metal by an NLAW or Javelin lmao
@perfectionbox2 жыл бұрын
Russian fire-and-forget system: Putin fires his generals and forgets about his soldiers 🤣
@CorvusCorax.2 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂👍
@shakeypudding65632 жыл бұрын
They should do a full recall on all of these. Lol👍
@jjanderson18842 жыл бұрын
These tanks have been upgraded already. Now there is a putin's Z swastika painted on them!
@KingSpittusFactus2 жыл бұрын
Zwastika
@Nick-fw5uj2 жыл бұрын
Most of them also have weird burn marks and holes in them, not sure why they are doing that but Ukraine says it makes them much better
@Tremumbus2 жыл бұрын
@@Nick-fw5uj the burn marks are from them sanitising them from covid so they can enter the country
@Nick-fw5uj2 жыл бұрын
@@Tremumbus Ah that might be it, maybe the holes are for extra ventilation due to covid aswell.
@viktorsavin90093 жыл бұрын
It is intended for arctic regions. If we consider tank versus tank battles (which are not the main task of tanks), then the T-80BVM is quite a worthy competitor to the Norwegian Leopard 2 A4
@ullldotten2 жыл бұрын
T-80BVM against M72, Javelins and NLAW's* :)
@jayjay533132 жыл бұрын
@@ullldotten Russians answer to Javelin top down attack missiles is the T-14 Armata but because of limited budget, they did not complete the active defenses and put only small numbers into service. The originally planned T-14 is to have sensors to detect incoming projectiles from above and to fire upwards explosive pellets shotgun style. Also due to limited resources, old tanks being deployed to Ukraine for additional fire support. T-80BVM is just the old T-80BV refitted with newer ERA and added extra side protection, not total remake like the T-90 from T-72.
@ullldotten2 жыл бұрын
@@jayjay53313 I'm aware. "Shame" it wont be any budget for T-14s for many, many years to come. My comment were not be taken too serious, was just pointing out how these performs against mostly javelins and NLAWs. No need to pull out our leopards' if the Russians (or more spesific their leader) descides to de-nazify Norway:)
@schlomogoldstien21712 жыл бұрын
@@ullldotten It is high time for the de-Nazification of Norway. Too many Quislings!
@1djbecker2 жыл бұрын
@@jayjay53313 The T-14 would be at least as vulnerable to immediately brewing up as the T-72 and T-80 that have tossed their turrets. A brew-up of the autoloader that rapid isn't going to spare the crew. The Afganit active protection system is a paper shield. It's a list of specs. It doesn't exist. They haven't developed the simpler version intended for the T-90MS. I expect that the T-14 now has zero chance of being built. It's already seven years past the introduction of the prototypes. Instead it will be back to the drawing board to figure out how build a vehicle with better survivability when hit from above.
@MaisistkeinGemuese9 ай бұрын
Very interesting to watch your older videos after "the Lazerpig incident", especially after he basically called you "Russian Propaganda". But we can clearly hear how you're criticizing the flaws and that barely anyone is mentioning those.
@erik83463 жыл бұрын
Video was informative but I noticed a lack of fine examples of Imperial technology like the Baneblade or any titans 5/10
@jarink12 жыл бұрын
I heard recently that they run out of fuel a lot and are vulnerable to LATWs.
@SashaFoxfort3 жыл бұрын
I guess it's a decent upgrade so that 2nd line of tanks have some chance in 2021 and onwards for a few years.
@astrosuperkoala12 жыл бұрын
Farmers have this now
@maplearrow18423 жыл бұрын
Amazingly well detailed videos as always, but could you do a video about the M8 buford AGS ( the US light tank project that got abandoned and restarted around 2016)? I love it’s concept, because the US lacks an armored vehicle more flexible logistically than the abrams while being better protected and armed than a bradley. Since the tanks are still being tested there’s not as much reference material, but I’m sure you’d figure that out. I discovered that tank because it got added as the top reward for the april fools grinding event on war thunder
@militaryanalysis50283 жыл бұрын
the M8 is quite a nice light tank, especially with the extra thicc ERA add-on armor modules giving it quite nice protection against RPG's and with the 120 mm gun giving it the same firepower capabilities of a heavy MBT, all combined in a relatively light vehicle to be air transported. It only lacks an independent thermal sight for the commander (CITV), but at least he can still use the gunner's thermal sight (better than nothing). Unfortuantely it also does not have a bunker with "blow-out blast panels" as the rounds are all stored inside the crew compartment (probably in some fire-proof canisters, but it still pose a danger). But I guess that's the downside for most light tanks.
@maplearrow18423 жыл бұрын
@@militaryanalysis5028 those are composite blocks and not ERA. I heard that there were plans to also have ERA armor but I am not a 100 percent sure. The 120mm smoothbore was only mounted on a single prototype if I remember correctly. Also the autoloader is completely separated from the crew, so there’s a blowout pannel. You’re right for the hu storage though, that doesn’t look very safe, but most of the shells are at the turret which is also the most likely part to be hit in a tank. I don’t think it needs CITV because 1, it’s meant to bring tank firepower to infantry/airborn troopers and so wouldn’t work independently. With the modernization of the buford m8 that is currently ongoing as the US asked BAE to produce around 20 more prototypes, they might include it. Overall it’s an amazing idea and I don’t get how the US could budget cut that and spend this long without something to replace the sheridan
@militaryanalysis50283 жыл бұрын
@@maplearrow1842 well tbh I'm not sure about the actual add-on armor design, all I know is that there are 3 levels of protection and the level 3 can apparently stop RPG's at least. Whether it's ERA or composite armor, it's still doing same result 😂. The crew is still inside the turret tho, even with autolaoder... so I hope the ammunitoion is at least is some fire-proof canisters, otherwise it would be really nasty. But what it really needs is APS that would really help a lot! Who knows maybe it will receive APS in the future (if it gets accepted into the army), everything's possible.
@maplearrow18423 жыл бұрын
@@militaryanalysis5028 due to it’s light armor it wouldn’t be dumb to develop a cheaper APS for it. Also I don’t understand what’s the issue with the turret, on one side you have the crew and on the other you have the autoloader. There’s quite a thick blast wall to separate both, and most of the roof above the autloader is made of blowout pannels, so in case of cookout it would never build enough pressure to do serious damage. The only downside with it is that if the turret gets shot sideways and it punctures the wall while there’s a burnout...
@maplearrow18423 жыл бұрын
@@militaryanalysis5028 by the way I found out that the two weird rectangles with lines on them on the xm8’s hull are actually the blowout pannels for the hull ammo. I never understood why that was there, but now I know that they didn’t just leave the hull ammo as a risk
@lastcrusader1012 жыл бұрын
This aged beautifully
@kirikomori78742 жыл бұрын
Congrats you now have an answer.
@napoleonibonaparte71983 жыл бұрын
Arjun could one-shot this foolish tank.
@ImLiterallyYourDaddy3 жыл бұрын
Cap
@bananabatsy37083 жыл бұрын
No. Even Leo 2A7 cannot pen the upper front plate at 1 kilometer. Only the driver port, lower glacis and breach.
@a.m.armstrong83543 жыл бұрын
@@bananabatsy3708 Arjun can penetrate from any distance.
@KingSpittusFactus3 жыл бұрын
Arjun can't even hit shit. Arjun can't do anything.
@giorgiogalliano053 жыл бұрын
@@bananabatsy3708 it’s a joke...
@MPdude2373 жыл бұрын
Hey RedEffect, great content covering T-80BVM. Can you cover the leaked “Bulrak” tank that has recently appeared? It looks very interesting.
@jakub04473 жыл бұрын
It would be interesting indeed, maybe only the amount of info available would be a slight problem
@MrMurder3336663 жыл бұрын
Bulrak ? Where did you find that ?
@user-fn6ct6zb7h3 жыл бұрын
@@MrMurder333666 Russia planned to change turrets on their tanks with Burlak turret in 2000s, Burlak can fit longer penetrators, has better armor and blast doors, but was abandoned. Then month or two ago they started testing it again, there are few leaked pics of it.
@Aes8803 жыл бұрын
Bulrak is a revived project from the 2000s ,Red talk about it b4
@user-ld3zw1ng9t3 жыл бұрын
Burlak you mean?
@roy1299 Жыл бұрын
Also don't forget, it throws turrets
@Robert_K_Wolf3 жыл бұрын
Man you make one of the most awesome military videos on KZbin. Have you ever considered making video about Polish tank PT-91 Twardy?
@stevesoltysiak11612 жыл бұрын
If ur interested in one, u can go to Any Ukrainian farms house and purchase one. They are littered All over Ukraine right now. Most without any damage… except for the graffiti of a Z painted on it. The Z seems to represent a knock-off Swastika. U may also be required to Remove the empty vodka bottles left from the previous crews
@savejeff152 жыл бұрын
Also bring fuel. A lot of fuel. Otherwise you will run out of it and strand in the middle of an invasion like a total idiot. That would be such an embarrassment
@taelorpickel28302 жыл бұрын
The Z has nothing similar with the Swastika.
@howleme59032 жыл бұрын
javelin hold my ammo
@sreser1112 жыл бұрын
turns out the Ukriane people dont need there tanks to take out the Russian ones.
@adrianotaylor72302 жыл бұрын
In tank on tank combat russian tanks are kicking ass the only time ukraine destroys russian tanks are im ambushes
@misterputin88982 жыл бұрын
@@adrianotaylor7230 Hmmmm that changes something? Russian tanks are obsolete bullshit and food for the ATGM's
@NKVD_Enjoyer2 жыл бұрын
The Russian's are still winning. Every Russian tank destroyed 5 okraine tanks.
@NKVD_Enjoyer2 жыл бұрын
@@misterputin8898 so just like every other tank you primitive clown kiddo? 🤡
@lelon50033 жыл бұрын
Suspicious video Drop after it released in war thunder Just joking;)
@erikaitsumi38522 жыл бұрын
Still not good enough against a tractor
@cascadianrangers7282 жыл бұрын
As a grunt, I sure as hell would not start a fight with one unless I had a javlen
@REDLION00442 жыл бұрын
Bet it doesn't protect against Javelin and NLaw. Lol.
@izzad7772 жыл бұрын
Javelin? NLAW? biatch cant even win against mud lmao.
@longyu93362 жыл бұрын
I have seen a few captured ones being reviewed and the Ukrainians were very pleased with them. They stressed the new Sosna U sight's quality as well as the ATGMs.
@bluudlung Жыл бұрын
yeah because they're upgrading from the T-64 lmao "very pleased with them" what a weirdo
@enriqueperezarce5485 Жыл бұрын
Yes because it’s either the 72 or 64 that Ukraine mostly has. Compare to their supposed “adversaries” the Abrams outcompetes it
@bluudlung Жыл бұрын
@@enriqueperezarce5485 the original T-72 has long since been upgraded. i hope you're not comparing an original T-72 to an original Abrams.
@olegbobrovskiy3244 Жыл бұрын
well its definitely better than the T64BV, and Bulats and Oplots exist in far too small numbers to make a big impact. Ironically the same is true of the T80BVM and T90M
@longyu9336 Жыл бұрын
@@olegbobrovskiy3244 T-80 BVMs appear (and get captured) in significant quantities. T-90M is true tho.
@Maax12002 жыл бұрын
As it turns out, another over hyped piece of russian junk.
@haruyukiarita22892 жыл бұрын
can survive against drones and javelin attacks?
@nicolaspeigne14293 жыл бұрын
So Relikt sideskirts as an armor upgrade modification in Warthunder.
@stalker52993 жыл бұрын
it was planned to come with this update but wasn't finished in time
@NecroxProduction2 жыл бұрын
This video aged unironically well.
@aking6102 жыл бұрын
That welding looks like my mum did it...
@vaikjsf34a2 жыл бұрын
Imagine how freaky it would be to try and tag a target with a laser only to have the turret instantly spin around and start pointing your direction. Time to crap yer pants :)
@flioink2 жыл бұрын
It's a junk-death-trap, judging by current events.
@NKVD_Enjoyer2 жыл бұрын
You talking about your mom?
@kazansky222 жыл бұрын
@@NKVD_Enjoyer sick burn.
@ABCantonese3 жыл бұрын
Would you do a video on tank upgrades? Say, a summary of T-55 upgrades, be it M-55S, Serbian T-55S, Tiran, Viet T-54M, AlZarrar, Durjoy, Chinese VT-3, Jaguar, Peruvian Tifon, T-55AGM, etc
@filamrider2 жыл бұрын
The problem with T80? almost all got blown up with Javs, Nlaw, in Ukrain.
@NKVD_Enjoyer2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, 100 billion tanks, 300 trillion Russian soldiers and 657 quadrillion Russian planes. Junk army
@LOLHAMMER456782 жыл бұрын
@@NKVD_Enjoyer 200th brigade lost a solid 30% of their assigned T-80BVM around Karkhiv lmao. Photo confirmed
@ninny652 жыл бұрын
T-80BVM aka the Conscript's tank
@757Poppy2 жыл бұрын
The main problem with this and similar is that it doesn't operate at optimum efficiency without fuel. Or a crew. Or a turret.
@supremespanker2 жыл бұрын
Lol
@dreci30013 жыл бұрын
While most of the things said are true, one needs to remember that that was "soviet era" one and only exploration into a gas-turbine tank, having a sturdy and proven T-72. The whole project was a test, R&D, and was to test the engine and chassis concept, similar to the M1A1 Abrams. The T-90 came after, back to diesel-multi fuel, 3 modifications. Also the T-14, and several modification into ERA and APS, as well as sights and active and passive defense systems. This is why it's so difficult to keep up with Russian tanks, several projects simultaneously, at different stages.....and they do have like thousands of old samples to mess up with. ;)
@tankredzr Жыл бұрын
The T72 was initially introduced as a temporary solution due to the issues encountered with the T64 and its slow production rate. As a result, the T72 was designed with a conservative approach. On the other hand, the T80 was not originally intended for research and development purposes only. The Soviet military had always been working on conceptual tanks, and once the T80 received its designation, it was chosen as the mainstay of the Soviet tank force. However, the T80 proved to be costly, gas-guzzling, and high maintenance. As a result, the T72 was retained as an alternative option. This is why there were three primary designs in the Soviet tank force. The T90 is essentially a renamed T72, and after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the production plant and thousands of T72 tanks remained in Russia, which is why they continue to be used to this day.
@nathanielweber7843 Жыл бұрын
I mean, maybe it’s difficult to keep up with Russian tanks by number of the sheer staggering variable designations from minor upgrade packages. But even if you look at the t-14 armata, the cutting edge russian tank has equipment they call cutting edge that was introduced onto nato tanks in the late 1980s. The thermal sights are literally the same model of sight the French Leclerc removed and upgraded from in 2006. Modern western civilian drones have better IR sights. And a test conducted with the Chinese concluded that all of its supposed hard kill and soft kill systems didn’t exist and were fabricated by the state to hype the tank to be more then it was. So in terms of keeping up with battlefield technology, Russian tanks can barely match what the west had in the early 90s. Nevermind current vehicles.
@dreci3001 Жыл бұрын
@@nathanielweber7843 I have to object here, this is no Serbia! While Russian tank designations and projects are out of bounds, even back in the Serbian war T-72s had night vision and thermals. I don't know what angle you are coming from, but Russian Armour has been significantly upgraded. The French were never good at anything, but keep gender neutral and carbon free Germany supplied by nuclear power plants, let's be honest. Abrams and the likes in excess of 50 tons, just can't function in mud and their operational costs are insane. Passive and active systems have been developed since the '80s. it's drones and hand held ATs now... "so I put a "curtain" so this 100,000 USD rocket scratches the paint" You're failing to understand that such warfare have never been fought before. All the issues we talk about here, have been considered. It's an economic and propaganda war..... T-72s with "grand momas curtains" are doing just fine, against Gustavs and top-down blowing AT rockets.....however in an environment like this most "western" tanks just bog down and when you take their sensors out, it's a sitting duck. Russian MBTs are usually less than 55 tons and can sprint @ 53 mph, it's not money, it's a doctrine!
@welcometovorkuta9 ай бұрын
@@nathanielweber7843well, consiidering the USSR's fall caused a lot of brain drain, the feds are very corrupt and their economy has mostly been dogwater they're doibg pretty well.
@TheInfamousMrFox2 жыл бұрын
It's biggest problem now is being abandoned by it's neo-fascist forces and towed away by Ukrainian tractors. Oh wait, that's the opposite of a problem. :D
@AJ-happydad2 жыл бұрын
Facts
@mattmark942 жыл бұрын
A week ago I watched a video of ukrainian farmers taking control of this tank, it was hilarious 👌🏻
@goldman65062 жыл бұрын
You know that an entire battalion of Ukraines best military in the south are literally nazis right?
@TheInfamousMrFox2 жыл бұрын
@@goldman6506 Why does every single 55 Savushkina street troll bleat "but azov, but azov, but azov" Sure there's a single small unit of right wing fighters defending their homes. Funnily enough they're from the East of Ukraine and they're descended from the ruSSkie colonizers that replaced the Ukrainians genocided during the Holodomor. It doesn't change the fact that putler sounds deranged trying to pretend that the elected, centre left, Jewish lead government of Ukraine is somehow fascist, when 3rd world ruSSia is actually a fascist nation.
@TheInfamousMrFox2 жыл бұрын
@@mattmark94 It's amazing, I've seen so many videos of invading fascist tanks, AA vehicles, BMPs, BDMs etc being towed away. 3rd world ruSSia is now officially the single biggest supplier of Ukrainian military vehicles.
@hoplite61642 жыл бұрын
funny to see all this analysis and it just gets torn apart by NLAWs and Javelins. I think the age of the tank is over
@SCH2922 жыл бұрын
Don't forget about the T90s and T90A getting getting hammered out there too. Lol. When T72 or any sort of Russian tank gets destroyed in the middle east the Ivans be like..."Those are cheap export versions!!!!! Cheap knock off version! That's because it wasn't Russian! Tank in urban combat without infantry support is stupid". I'm 100% sure you seen all the excuses made by Ivan. These days Russian T72, the upgraded variants, T80U and T90A are getting knock out in Ukraine even when they have infantry as support. Now these Ivans are like..."That's because Putin is only sending in the older equipment and conscripted as cannon fodders to weaken Ukraine's defense! He doesn't care about casualties or equipment losses. He's saving the best for last!" 5mins later..."Those deaths are all fake! Propaganda!" Yeah...you see the endless excuses.
@shirghazaycowboys2 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't say so. Tanks still fill a vital role on the battlefield. Unless people feel like making major land invasions with infantry and trucks/IFVs. Incompetence=/=obsolescence
@ireallycant44162 жыл бұрын
Jesus Christ.. the current war just shows how tanks are total absolute.
@dzonikg2 жыл бұрын
@@SCH292 TAnks still have place on battlefield..dont go in 2 much MSM propaganda ..Russia lost a lot in first few days but also make good progress against very good Ukraine army ..its now encircled most off Ukrainian big cities and that would not be able with out tanks because Ukraine has much more soldiers then Russia in Ukraine ..yes you lost off armor but still casualties much lower then if you would went with out it
@NKVD_Enjoyer2 жыл бұрын
You act like a Abrams would not die from a Javaline🤡
@theeditingdepartment94213 жыл бұрын
Do you think it should get the cage armor in WT?
@the_burger3 жыл бұрын
Not only that, it should also get its side skirts.
@EuroNoobz2 жыл бұрын
"The armor is effective against Ukraines old rockets " Ukraine: gets 17k javelins and stingers from NATO.. after a few weeks it's pretty clear that a lot of things are not the way they should be in the Russian army, luckily I might add. If they ever fight NATO like they fight Ukraine they would of be annihilated. I sincerely hope Vladiwar won't use his cowardly bioweapons.
@theboone38482 жыл бұрын
Sadly he might to save face. Ukraine is embarrassing him in front of the whole world.
@ValentinA-nx9wm2 жыл бұрын
@@theboone3848 that’s what I’m afraid of. Instead of retreating he’ll just bomb the whole country to dust to,prove he is still powerful…
@jonathanpfeffer37162 жыл бұрын
nobody uses bioweapons except terrorists. they are indiscriminate and inherently just as easy to hurt yourself with as the enemy.
@NKVD_Enjoyer2 жыл бұрын
Cope, did you ate again some primitive ukra-propoganda?
@NKVD_Enjoyer2 жыл бұрын
@@theboone3848 yeah nah, primitive idiots who believe in stupid ukra-propogandapropaganda are not human, they don't count.
@AverageWarCrimeEnjoyer3 жыл бұрын
Almost all of this information is true, except the thing about protection. Late production T 80BV had the same armor layout as T 80U, making their protection identical. So, T 80BVM, not only has Relict at its front, it also has an added plate the material and thickness of which I can't remember
@Brother_Nihilus3 жыл бұрын
Source?
@AverageWarCrimeEnjoyer3 жыл бұрын
@@Brother_Nihilus I have a Russian post, but you will have to use Google translate
@DerDop2 жыл бұрын
So....the fanboys are still blaming Syrian or irakian crews for this Ukrainian debacle?
@NKVD_Enjoyer2 жыл бұрын
What do you mean? Russia is doing pretty good. More than 40% of okraine is under Russian control and every Russian tank destroyed at least 5 okrainan tanks🤡
@DerDop2 жыл бұрын
@@NKVD_Enjoyer it's doing so good in 20th day of the 48th hour special operation. :)) You're being delusional.. even Russians are running from Russia, and trolls like you still waste time by posting these low IQ propaganda B's. Man, in drug dealers world there's a saying, never get high on your own supply..This should be applied to Russian propaganda...never believe your own lies, or you'll start believing that cope cages work, you have a modern army and a strong economy and that Putin is a good leader :)). You made your account a week ago and you have 30 comments on this page alone.... Bahaha. Poor Russian, still believing that the year is 1968.. ah, i forgot, Russia is still in the 70"s.
@cyclingnerddelux6982 жыл бұрын
They have been conducting successful field trials of their turret ejection system in the Ukraine.
@jafon93 жыл бұрын
Shame it doesn't have its proper sideskirts in War Thunder yet.
@depressedfurry8129 Жыл бұрын
this modification is only needed so that tanks are not thrown into the trash, it makes no sense to spend a lot of money on it, it's easier to build a T-90 with this money
@mystictomato9466 Жыл бұрын
Man your videos have become infested with “I think and do what the US government tells me to think and do” bots. USA should use a portion of her military budged to build a huge mental institution for these folks, they have become a hindrance for people who want to watch your videos in order to inform themselves. I would like to see you make a video on what exactly does the T-90M have, which saves it from being destroyed out in the battlefield, that the T-72B3 and T-80BMV do not have?
@lutherburgsvik6849 Жыл бұрын
They're everywhere unfortunately. Seen them in many comment sections. Going by their attitude they seem to be juvenile americans.
@mystictomato9466 Жыл бұрын
@@lutherburgsvik6849 Yep, easy to brainwash by their own government. They’re gonna have a really bad time if Abrams actually gets send to Ukraine. I can imagine them getting hospitalized when seeing their invincible tank burning.
@filipmisko93633 жыл бұрын
T80bwm with kontakt 5 side is marine version because relikt era side does not fit in landing craft.
@user-dl3nc4jx7k3 жыл бұрын
everything is simpler, just the Ministry of Defense does not have the money to purchase a more expensive and better stopping effect relic, contact 5 is an obsolete defense. which was relevant to the year in 1995 , the relic is now also almost obsolete, it was replaced by the protection of malachite developed on that Armata. but apparently it is even more expensive, for the purchase and mass production of armat, the military department now has no money. all funds are spent on equipping the army with expensive hypersonic missiles
@WhoopityDoo2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, But Ukrainian farmers love 'em.
@fattyMcGee972 жыл бұрын
It doesn’t help that they put egg cartons in place of ERA in those ERA containment bags on the sides lmao
@juadwhite13913 жыл бұрын
Arjun is meant for the star wars, nothing can be comparable to this marvelous tank.
@AdvocatusDiaboliFin2 жыл бұрын
But what if the country you are invading has... mud?
@Postoronniy3 жыл бұрын
This is just an interim upgrade similar to T-72B3M to extend lifetime of existing fleet. Only several brigades (motor rifle and naval infantry) in the Far East and Arctic are armed with T-80BV(M)s. Besides that, only the 4th Guards tank division in Western MD is armed with T-80s (BVM in motor rifle regiment, U and UE-1 in tank regiments). And since its T-80Us have not gotten any significant upgrades in the last decade (despite widespread T-72 and now T-90 fleet modernization), the 4th GTD is probably one of the first formations in line to be rearmed with T-14s.
@germanboy7673 Жыл бұрын
They stopped existing 5 months ago
@Senaleb2 жыл бұрын
You missed the main feature of the cope cage.
@ImWallace7993 жыл бұрын
As long as this isn't against the T80 series as a whole. I Think the T80 is a great tank capable of combat today with speed and gun and armor.
@ricefarmerryan79952 жыл бұрын
problem #1: The Javelin exists
@mbtenjoyer9487 Жыл бұрын
Looking back at this i think it would’ve been better to make T-72B2 instead of T-80BVM
@BreadPittAAAAHHHH6 ай бұрын
No T-72b2 has horrible maneuverability plus it can’t start engine in -50 degrees like the T-80bvm
@shinchan-F-urmom3 жыл бұрын
One Arjun tank can defeat the entire Russian Army, Navy and Air Force
@srelma3 жыл бұрын
What about space force?
@darnit19443 жыл бұрын
@@srelma The Russians has no such thing. But even if they had, what threat do they pose to the mighty Arjun?
@arcturus47623 жыл бұрын
@@darnit1944 Arjun is so powerful not even another Arjun can kill Arjun. In fact, back in 2018, Arjun found out Arjun was behind the plot to assassinate Arjun
@darnit19443 жыл бұрын
@@ninjadosgamesbr7281 Still no mstch for Arjun
@henryfriedel39843 жыл бұрын
I learned that this tank is meant for very cold environmet, because it's gas turbine is there favorable. Don't think to meet many western tanks at the nordcap or sibiria.
@okay24393 жыл бұрын
I'm not that much into tanks, I believe the Abrams has a turbine engine
@Trump-a-Tron3 жыл бұрын
@@okay2439 Correct. You should also look up the Arjun tank, as per this comment section.
@dodgedemonsrtx3 жыл бұрын
@@Trump-a-Tron ARJUN????
@nemisous833 жыл бұрын
I feel like your core argument is T-80BVM is based on T-80BV and not T-80U which really is a stupid argument because aside from turret armor which only better by about 50mm is effectively the same as T-80BV in terms of firepower, mobility, and protection. The point of T-80BVM wasn't to bring T-80 to T-90M standard (I don't know where you go that from) it was to bring T-80 up to T-72B3 mod 2016 standard which in a lot of ways surpasses its. and before you ask "why not modernized T-80U" ? Remember Russia made less that 2,000 T-80U tanks with only a few hundred remaining in Russian service compared to the over 2,500 T-80BV tanks so BV was the obvious choice.
@AFT_05G Жыл бұрын
In WT it’s literally the best tank in the game,and vatniks try to deny Russian bias at all costs.
@user-ev4pb9xj7e2 жыл бұрын
The main problem is that the turret pops off when a Javlin hits it.
@bigchungus63202 жыл бұрын
Every tank has that when it’s ammo explode
@aesirgaming10142 жыл бұрын
One thing we can say for the T-80 is it seems to continue the good old Russian Turret Dispenser tradition. It's time to just face the facts. Russian tanks are nowhere near to being on the level of modern US tanks. That's fine if you go by doctrine (the Russians are quantity over quality). However, what we have seen in Ukraine shows us that these tanks are nowhere near to being on the same level as the newer updated Abrams. Besides for tank-specific features, the Russian tanks clearly lack the same battlefield integration systems as the US is pushing onto the Abrams (despite Russia saying that they are focusing on this). How can we tell this? Because of how incredibly disjointed Russian operations have looked. There's many videos of tanks advancing into ambushes without infantry support and of infantry advancing into ambushes without Russian support. Completely absent is the presence of the Russian air force providing close air, or even high-level artillery coordination to clear enemy strongpoints. The Russian army literally looks like a Banana Republic's army. The only thing they seem to be able to do is shell population centers. If it weren't for the attacks on civilian populations, the Russian army would be the meme army of the world right now. Sorry if you're a Russian fanboy, but the Russian invasion of Ukraine is showing that Russia is far from competing as a great power when it comes to modern militaries. Simply put, all their talk has been shown to be just that...empty words.
@Orcawhale12 жыл бұрын
The problem isn't with the tanks, it's with the logistics, and lack of air cover to shoot down the TB-2 drones. Which is destroying their supply convoys, forcing troops to abandon their tanks/equipment.