Pyramid of Authority for Anglican Christians

[@Samitchmeister]

This is great, super accessible and comprehensive. Looking forward to seeing more

[@BrockSamson18]

A very good and Anglican teaching. A Christian collapses these categories at his pearl. I would ask: how do fathers and husbands, being the patriarchs of their families, rank in this list? They do have a legitimate grace and command to teach their families as we see in Exodus 13:8, Deuteronomy 4:9 and 6:6-9, Isaiah 38:19, Acts 22:3, Ephesians 5:26 and 6:4 amoung others.

[@wyattpruitt6965]

I think that fathers would be in the category of pastor in there family, where the mother is the Church and the Father is the Son of God. There is a Pastoral authority here

[@jjsalas]

Very cool Video Brother. I am curious: If you were not Anglican, what Protestant tradition would you be a part off? What do you feel closer to?

[@wyattpruitt6965]

I actually currently am in a presbyterian church and have never been a member of an Anglican church. This is not out of not wanting to be Anglican but out of the circumstances of my life. I would say I am presbyterian as of now until I join an Anglican church. But I would say Dutch Reformed or Lutheran. I actually really like a denomination called the URCNA

[@reformedholycannoli]

My guy cooked with this one

[@jmh7977]

I don't see why I or others similar couldn't apply this also as an LCMS Confessional Lutheran.

[@EF-111-]

You can apply it to other denominations, in fact that is exactly what this video is doing. This idea came from a redeemed zoomer vid on the pyramid of authority for reformed/presbyterian. God bless.

[@wyattpruitt6965]

Exactly

[@wyattpruitt6965]

I said that it especially fit episcopal Lutherans (Evangelical Catholics) just because they are closer in theology to Anglicans than to LCMS/WELS

[@david_porthouse]

First Bible produced in England had 72 books. What's the authority to remove six of them?

[@wyattpruitt6965]

I am not removing them. The apocrypha is part of the bible. But the canon of scripture is 66 books. So there is a full Catholic Bible, with a 66 book Canon. I dont think a bible is complete without the apocrypha

[@david_porthouse]

@@wyattpruitt6965 But that 72 book Bible didn't have any Apocrypha.

[@wyattpruitt6965]

@ I believe I am ignorant to what you are talking about then? Could you explain a little more?

[@david_porthouse]

@@wyattpruitt6965 I am referring to the 72-book Codex Amiatinus, produced in Jarrow or Monkwearmouth about 700 AD, which I am assuming to be the prototype for any English-produced Bible. It is actually the oldest codex still in one piece.

[@wyattpruitt6965]

@@david_porthouse I do not know much about this codex, but from what I read it seems that this codex has support of the counter reformation. Where as the KJV used the Textus Receptus and the MT.