Quantum Entanglement: 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics

#QuantumEntanglement #nobelprize #BrianGreene
The 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded to Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger for their groundbreaking work in Quantum Entanglement. Here is a brief visual summary of the essential physics.
Official Site: www.worldsciencefestival.com/
Twitter: / worldscifest
Facebook: / worldsciencefestival
Instagram: / worldscifest
#Science #WorldScienceFestival

[@vaishnavinagrale5429]

I have deep interest in quantum physics and technology, and this Nobel Prize encourage me to dig deeper in this field... Congrats Alain Aspect, John Clauser and Anton Zeilinger.

[@warriordx5520]

Same

[@VeganSemihCyprus33]

The Connections (2021) [short documentary] 💖🌳💖

[@grantbudge3134]

Just take physics lol

[@zack9501]

Same. It's quite an exciting time to be alive; at the forefront of futuristic advancement. I can't wait to see how the next generation of scientists will put quantum entanglement to use!

[@rockerzzz...353]

I came down to post the same comment.. but you had already done!!great

[@Petticca]

Thank you for the mini presentation for context. I love when public educators understand that incredibly complex ideas aren't intuitive to grasp for those without the education background in physics/mathematics. Giving a very basic breakdown of the breakthroughs that led to current understanding is vital for those of us who are fascinated and want to learn about complicated areas of knowledge, but would not be able to grasp much without that surface level understanding of how scientists know the things they do. I am grateful to be able to watch content like this and increase my understanding, even slightly, and my enthusiasm greatly. Thank you.

[@nyworker]

The fact that reality starts as something probabilistic and non-deterministic which evolved into the determinate and predictable is perfectly intuitive.

[@hwhshahwjsjs3556]

wwhat

[@batchimegdamdindorj8557]

I think that makes reality a subjective experience rather than an objective truth.

[@anonymousman4419]

@@batchimegdamdindorj8557 We can't escape our subjectivity. It's fundamental in our observation.

[@universecode3692]

Thank you Dr.Brian Greene. I have been reading your book-'The fabric of the Cosmos'-really interesting. Thanks to you, I can be available to understand about Physics including the Quantum mecahanics too, even though I am not professional this field. Thank you so much.

[@tipeneoxenham8536]

Kia ora Brian, thank-you very much. I look forward to you unravelling entanglement even further. Your gift of encapsulating and communicating extraordinary difficult physics to laypeople is so helpful. What a wonder of a time for physics this is.

[@quartneypretorius4601]

Kia Ora Tipene, fellow kiwi over here! And I absolutely agree with you! It was a great video!

[@fractalnomics]

2:12 since they added two women in the picture that had nothing to do with the quantum revolution (check yourself) they could have added Kiwi Lord Rutherford too, ah.

[@FreeIreland32CountyRepublic]

I'll never understand why nobel don't award these prizes posthumously. That was a remarkable piece of work by John Bell, he should be recognised today as a Nobel laureate along with the 3 experimentalists that confirmed his work.

[@kenadams5504]

No 'Bell' prize .

[@FreeIreland32CountyRepublic]

@@kenadams5504 I see what u did there 🤓 Kudos!

[@temelturan8609]

My feelings for the presentation is perfect, I understood very well why they given the prize to these 3 clever minds.

[@philomat77]

Thank you Brian Green! I loved your presentation . But I can only wish for more explicit descriptions of your expression "rolled out" at 6:42 : does it mean that Einstein's intuition was proved to be wrong? test establishing to most people's 6:40 satisfaction Einstein's conventional 6:42 view of reality is rolled out that 6:44 quantum entanglement is real and more

[@umeshchandramakwana806]

Excellently explained, I always love your explanation!

[@VeganSemihCyprus33]

The Connections (2021) [short documentary] 💖🌳💖

[@keepcalm7453]

We expect a long and engaging interview of the laureates here on this channel.💝🙏🙏💝

[@-_Nuke_-]

this yes!

[@ToasterBrain]

The best science educator out there. Great Channel!

[@AnkitPatel-jz2os]

Don't disrespect Derek from Veritasium

[@VeganSemihCyprus33]

The Connections (2021) [short documentary] 💖🌳💖

[@madandu]

Now more curious about the spooky-behaviour. Hope to see an another video specific to this Nobel-prize achievement.

[@rin1875]

Although i did not understand most of what u have said but it gave me goosebumps multiple times our world is too great to be a mere coincidence

[@christinley5213]

Congratulations fellas… wonderful job.. thank you!

[@NichaelCramer]

There are a couple issues that needs to be corrected here. 1] Despite the fact that it’s constantly repeated in the popular media (as it is here) Einstein’s objection to QM never was based on its probabilistic nature. Instead, it had to do with the inherent non-local nature of the theory (I.e the inescapable “action at a distance”). 2] Likewise, an equally problematic issue is the way in which these objections are depicted (and simplistically dismissed) as if Einstein was just “wrong”; I.e. he was simply too dense or to out of touch to “get it”. But the fact remains that Einstein was, in a fundamental sense, correct here. That is: although it is, of course, true that Bell, Aspect, et al have demonstrated the QM (and the universe) behaves in this non-local way, anyone who isn’t deeply amazed or bewildered by that fact is very much missing the point. (Or as Feynman said: “Anyone who thinks they understand Quantum Mechanics hasn’t had it explained to them properly.”)

[@family-accountemail9111]

I don't understand it all but hold onto the fact that no useful information is transmitted by the spooky action at a distance ? Is this believe I have true ? Or do I not even understand that?

[@NichaelCramer]

@@family-accountemail9111 : Correct. No information can be passed between the entangled particles.

[@peterells1720]

@@NichaelCramer I totally agree with both your postings Nichael. See my KZbin video "The tangled history of quantum entanglement"

[@krzysztofciuba271]

a proof scientists do not have a clue about the methodology of their own subject matter,i.e. called the philosophy of science; QM is a statistical theory and not about an "object"; hence, all these debates are silly: EPR arguments are useless theoretically and experimentally like the textbooks' exercises to count the wavelengths of a baseball ball or any rigid object- a proof of perfect authors idiocy the same like the "superposition of the states of Schrodinger cat and the mathematical formulas for it.

[@VeganSemihCyprus33]

The Connections (2021) [short documentary] 💖🌳💖

[@sfbuck415]

but Einstein wasn't wrong when he said our understanding was incomplete. Einstein's theories didn't stop being useful when quantum physics came along, so why would you think that means quantum physics is the final word? because it works? except when it doesn't...just like relativity. there's something more going on that we aren't seeing.

[@Rational326]

Yes. I too feel exactly the same way.

[@user-mz6pd3hp3s]

So terse and elucidating synopsis! Thanks Brian!

[@TheMemesofDestruction]

Congratulations Everybody!!!

[@fabiocaetanofigueiredo1353]

None of this would have been possible without J. Bell's work. He should be one of the winners.

[@fabiocaetanofigueiredo1353]

Laureates

[@charlesgantz5865]

@@fabiocaetanofigueiredo1353 Unfortunately, Bell died too soon.

[@jamesraymond1158]

Nobel specified in his will that only living people could get the award. It was a bad decision.

[@justice929]

John Bell died 1990.

[@VeganSemihCyprus33]

The Connections (2021) [short documentary] 💖🌳💖

[@loipham31]

An awesome science related presentation. It is so inspirational. Thank you

[@benkaa4915]

Tenakoe .... not to mention Bohr who was shown to be right over Einstein, after Jim Al Khalili turned the crank for us with Bell's equation.

[@VeganSemihCyprus33]

The Connections (2021) [short documentary] 💖🌳💖

[@tiagogoncalves8045]

So the more we know, the less we understand and the less we really know. This is fascinating!

[@angielorenacv]

Omg! this is spooky indeed :D Technology is about to get even crazier. It's exciting to live in this time of history. I'm so grateful for this channel where we can get professional explanation and it's a reliable source of information. Thank you, Professor!

[@jaiprakashnt]

did they really solve how to manipulate the particles and start communication using particle entanglement.

[@zypheralexander837]

A frequency wave is a multi dimensional structure.that has mass and distance therefore the energy, frequency waves and vibrations change through out the structure

[@captain_context9991]

AS ALWAYS..... 95% of these science videos starts out in the 1920s and build up to present day...... Using THE ENTIRE VIDEO to tell us things we hear from EVERY video, and the remaining 10 seconds on getting to the actual point.

[@davidherdoizamorales7832]

yes, it is called context.

[@family-accountemail9111]

I can't get my head around what Bell did, it would have been nice if it could be explained what they did? A really good communicator would be able to explain something or tell me how to get there.

[@robertwolski2787]

I'm stupid, I need the intro.

[@richardconway6425]

Captain_Context I totally agree, it's really quite tiresome, because by the end of the video I'm still no wiser as to what these 3 people did, or how they did it. It's lazy, poor communication. It's much easier to give a well trodden history spiel, than to try and explain the intricacies of their work. Brian Greene is not exactly my favourite science communicator, he speaks to his audience as though they were children, and it feels so patronising.

[@stefanolacchin4963]

Try PBS Space Time. Although I suspect you'll come to miss these ones.

[@johnPaul-qn3dg]

John Bell was nominated for the Nobel but unfortunately he died of a stroke in 1990, he really should have been awarded it earlier, but as an Irish man we are still proud of him.

[@norcalridgerunners4206]

Wow this is huge! Congrats!

[@VijayGupta-cz4ef]

PicoPhysics: The essential element of the PicoPhysicst Thought process is reality exists irrespective of Observer. Observation is a projection of reality on the Observer. So once an entangled pair is produced - irrespective of the time of measurement on individual particles the result will be the same. The measurements can be performed simultaneously, or with a gap in space and time, it can not affect the result. The observation on "Quantum Entanglement" establishes reality is not affected by observation. The uncertainty principle must be seen in this perspective (Impact of observation on reality).

[@lanimulrepus]

Excellent presentation.

[@BariScienceLab]

A beautiful presentation!

[@vikasmadhok8240]

Salute to those who can think beyond thinkable!!

[@stianmathisen4284]

This proves that fundamental reality is a digital virtual reality phenomenon, and not a material mechanical based one, space time is therefor out of the question in regards the definitions of fundamental reality! Thank you Anton Zeilinger for your scientific contribution in solving one of the most fundamental existensial questions!!!

[@stianmathisen4284]

@Bobby T And i am lauging at you!!

[@VijayGupta-cz4ef]

PicoPhysics: Do not agree with this interpretation. Rather it proves Reality exists irrespective of observer. Reality is real; It exists whether observed or not.

[@stianmathisen4284]

@@VijayGupta-cz4ef How does this prove locality to be fundamental?

[@stianmathisen4284]

At least laughing is good for your health, so i did not do you any wrong...!?

[@archanatravelvijay763]

PicoPhysics: Thanks Sir. You are the first one to ask me a question on PicoPhysics. Let us say we have conservation of charge as a fundamental reality. A neutral particle " say a photon > 1.04 Mev" splits to form two particles that fly apart in space. At any time in the future. if one of the particles is detected to be +ive, the other can be inferred to be -ve. Now this proves a reality. However in the case of entanglement due to our preconceived notion of interpretation of Schrodinger's equation, we talk in terms of probability (ruling out nothing at any time) the characteristic on the companion particle has to be physically determined and not inferred. Hence the determination of +ive charge on one particle transmits through space to other particles to be determined -ive. These Entaglement observations are similar. It proves the reality of entanglement rather than mystifying the universe further. Scherodinger's equation when derived from Unary Principle (Space Contains Kenergy) the wave function is K-energy density - a function of space and chronological variable. And interpretation of the probability of finding an object at a location is replaced by the possibility of finding the object at that location. In PicoPhysics Universe is composed by two identities Sapce & Kenergy. The relationship between the two is enunciated by the Unary Principle "Space Contains Kenergy". While primary interaction between Space and kenergy manifests in the phenomenon we observe as the Refraction of light. @@stianmathisen4284 apart

[@alanbrady420]

I love this channel thanks professor Greene

[@bornatona3954]

He is an actor

[@alanbrady420]

He’s not. What have you been smoking?

[@smlanka4u]

He is good for hollywood. Elementary particles use mathematical communication. Quantum entanglement shows us that not only time, but also distance is relative. The many-world interpretation that explains the collapse of the wave function remove the probabilistic nature of elementary particles, and makes the nature of elementary particles somewhat deterministic.

[@VeganSemihCyprus33]

The Connections (2021) [short documentary] 💖🌳💖

[@tanveerkhan-mi2zr]

Sir three scientist deserve Nobel prize for contribution physics . Quantum mechanics .state .. and ancient DNA human origins 🇺🇸👍🇮🇳

[@clientesinformacoes6364]

there is peculiarity in those particles, they travel at speed of light, what ever is connected between them since the beginning, will remain connected, it's kinda freezes gravity or electromagnetic field that remains constant between them creating one dimension or one piece that collapses when we measure them, because time starts to run again, it switches to our dimension, gravity wouldn't allow them to travel at speed of light in the opposite directions if they are connected by gravity, somehow "gravity" must gain energy as they go apart. It's hard to correlates distance and time, it seems like the particles goes back in time for us as an observer. In other words, if we put two particles in the opposite sides on a balloon, they go apart as the balloon inflates, the act to measure one particle is when we break the balloon, they disconnect immediately, the time is much shorter to take them apart, the energy releases much faster, space time crashes the whole structure, or if we make a hole in the balloon, both particles will stop immediately as the balloon stop inflating, no matter where we make the hole. We can't deny this possibility because planets can get apart faster then speed of light as the universe expands, the problem is the dimension we are, space time can create dimensions to our prospective.

[@donnapicone1576]

Entanglement has it’s faster than light communication in which information changes the state of a physical particle. However the act of observation, which by definition has no physical component also changes its panicle instantaneously. What I’m asking comment on is the lcomparison. Between these 2 acts.

[@justice929]

Good to see Anton win Noble Prize...

[@vanikaghajanyan7760]

Any measurement of a physical quantity involves some interaction between the measuring device and the object under study. In this case, not only the object under study affects the device, changing its state (due to which measurement becomes possible), but the device also acts on the object under study, changing its state to some extent. Thus, in the general case, the observer is an evolving (- when measuring, his state changes), researcher of the spontaneous evolution of the Universe. The complete state function is a plane monochromatic wave that coincides with the de Broglie wave. Of course, such a coincidence comes from the fact that the de Broglie hypothesis was used from the very beginning in the development of quantum mechanics, and then the peculiarity of the wave function is that the normalization condition is not fulfilled for it - when a particle is detected, its probability is one; on the contrary, with the free movement of a particle, there is an equal probability of detecting a particle at any point in space. Physically, this is caused by the fact that absolutely free particles do not exist in nature, and therefore the concept of free movement is some idealization of the real state of affairs. And quantum mechanics admits the possibility of states close to free, which is unsatisfactory. That is, the observer always measures everything permanently (often without even suspecting it), for example, the observer monitors the state of Schrodinger's cat due to the simple phenomenon called interaction, and does not expect any surprise after opening the box with the cat (this applies to experiments with entangled particles and double-slit effects). Interaction is a dimension.Measurement is a measure of awareness of the observer/object interaction. P.S. "The inner perfection of the theory requires its external (experimental) justification." (Einstein). It seems that the external (experimental) "justification" of quantum mechanics has long demanded its internal perfection.

[@khinmaungthein2624]

Congratulation...!!!

[@wernerchess72]

Great moment for the Physics congratulations

[@25_26]

sending data back in time is possible due to quantum entanglement which has been awarded with nobel prize for the proof this year. Einstein was wrong about Bohr's proposition and called it a spooky action but in fact this also fits in his famous equation which is e=mc2/√1-(v2/c2). Because always worked with real numbers which corresponds to particles with positive mass, and only "particles" without mass are light and gluons which are called luxons. But if you use i2=-1 imaginary numbers which corresponds to particles with negative mass, and with the help of lorentz equation backup, then mathematically there proves that there must be particles with negative mass and they must be always faster than light which are called tachyons, in fact those particles can create faster than light zones of space-time which have different laws of physics, and when those zones interact with each other, the quantum entanglement effect appears which is already proved and nobel prized this year. For the causality preservation, they need to build closed systems which cannot directly interact with the known universe, or another option is the parallel universes which is more logical because if you try to break the causality effect of universe, there might be catastrophic results in a single universe theory. So in parallel universes, yes you can send data back in time actually. Einstein himself even feared this possibility and made tachyonic phone taught experiment with his collegues and called this spooky action eventually. But in the year of 2022, now they accept and proved that is real. Whoever has this technology will be the master of this universe and maybe fhe others. Because when you can change the past, you can create a whole new reality and this means basically you become "the god" with the saying of religious people.

[@ericsalles1424]

I love when this man teaches. WSF Rocks!

[@evangelosspyromilios5994]

wow ! As good as an episode of "Cosmos" Congrats !!

[@taka-taktak]

I did a presentation on this topic in my undergrad.

[@zypheralexander837]

In a single frequency wave how much information can be put in it?our entire body receives and transmits frequency waves so how much information does our energy structure hold?

[@DobrinWorld]

Thank you Brian Greene!

[@NCC_1701]

I'm reasonably certain that photons move instantaneously from the emission, to the absorption/reflection too. It's the wavefunction which propagates at C.

[@thingsiplay]

Photons itself do not experience time.

[@toddjoseph2412]

I have measured both the position and velocity of an electron using Quantum Entanglement the answer i got was 10^ -10 meters for position and velocity I got 10^6 meters/second.

[@KVRRR999]

E=mass X x square will be the energy equation , where x tends to infinity , mass tends to zero.

[@jennybardoville5455]

Glad they've caught up

[@touchheartyoga]

Oh how good it is to live now. It’s kind of simple some thing or things can make little or big changes. This is massive. As we understand and give application to this the world will change. If you think about it cell phones and our various devices can provide us with news that can become our collective consciousness. When we develop better healthier cleaner faster tools as a result of the potential in the technology the desire to be a part of the movement forward might be enough to direct our shared consciousness to let go of the less valuable and perhaps historical damaging aspects of our existence here on the blue dot.

[@stevedavey9435]

pure love for sharing this knowledge

[@gmxmatei]

Knowledge about ghosts?

[@lilangelpop]

Thank you! ❤

[@halidapoudjak]

Quantum entanglement means everything we see in our inner space is inherently tied to what we see outside all around us as well. This is ironic when you consider how much Einstein valued imagination. He rejected the quantum perspective of his time so much, because he couldn’t reconcile the notion within himself, and thus he found the means to prove himself right as this respects the notion that what he was doing, was affecting what is collectively understood and observed outside of his inner understanding. Fascinating.

[@sohraballahyari7595]

With regard to quantum mechanics presentation and interpretations, It so appears as though there are two different approaches are being considered here,one being the correlation in between the states of the two particles taking place due to an entanglement media or element not exactly known to them what it could actualy be,which by my interpretation could only be explained by the all around universal entanglement through the scalarwave mechanism and energies spreading throughout the vastness of all iniverse,also bei g emitted from the surfaces of all electron and atoms at quantum levels of the subatomic motions Of quaks and other particles as also explained by string theory of prof Kaku, ,and the 2nd approach could be based of stat8stics and probabilities by eliminating all the most improbable states Of the particles reaching out to higher level of probabilities,which must take place via multiple questioning and elimination operations to reach for more rel8able outcomes. And as the Einstein's statement calls the later the outcome is indicated active of a spooky unexplainable correlation,which can only be explanained in terms of la2s of probabilities and statistics,and may be once the two particles are initially aquinted with each other and then seperated ,their initial aquintance will cause a reset of initial staes between the two particles,which could be needed to make subsequent calculations of probabilities more feasible by eliminating many calculation operations to begin with.

[@thenerdguy9985]

@2:00 When you realize all the scientists he named were from Germany. Just one country. I am always amazed at how advanced Germany was before world war 2 in science, mainly Physics.

[@VijayGupta-cz4ef]

PicoPhysics: Quantum Entanglement experimental proof establishes a deterministic nature in line with the thought process of PicoPhysics. While modern science deals with uncertainties and probabilities, PicoPhysics explains observations on the universe with determinism and Possibilities. PicoPhsics is a deterministic theory based on Unary Law "Space Contains Kenergy".

[@master_rajeev]

I deserve Nobel prize in physics.

[@kenadams5504]

For what?

[@KaijuMobsta]

Fr bro, you the smartest man I know

[@srimoyeedas7424]

Can we have a seminar with brian greene and all the noble laureates of 2022. That will be the most enriching thing of this year

[@AbdulHafeez-cq6oo]

great i hope more pplications of quantum entanglement will follow

[@djayjp]

REALLY need posthumous Nobels. Bell's work demands one!

[@spiralsun1]

No, that encourages stagnation of science, and the other areas too. The idea was to help enable people to do great things which benefit humanity. It eventually became an honor we revere. I should have one 12 times over, it just depends on if people understand what you are doing. Think of it-Pasteur would not have received one, or the early “germ theorists” either. They were ridiculed. So actually that part is bad. They tend to be awarded to people who work under the current assumptions. If not then all the problems you solve and predictions you make are not recognized and/or works that show something you predicted but they misinterpret get the award. Like in this video. That effect is key to understanding what reality is. Anyway this video was awesome regardless 😂🤷‍♀️

[@djayjp]

@@spiralsun1 People who are dead still inspire us today. This contribution should be honoured and, as you pointed out, because often they were not in their own time. One's legacy is important as well. It could also be non-monetary (so the $1m prize is not needed).

[@spiralsun1]

@@djayjp that’s a good point. Thanks 🙏🏻 ya the money wouldn’t be needed… you’re right.

[@John777Revelation]

Modern Quantum Physics has shown that reality is based on probability: ​ A statistical impossibility is defined as “a probability that is so low as to not be worthy of mentioning. Sometimes it is quoted as 1/10^50 although the cutoff is inherently arbitrary. Although not truly impossible the probability is low enough so as to not bear mention in a Rational, Reasonable argument." The probability of finding one particular atom out of all of the atoms in the universe has been estimated to be 1/10^80. The probability of just one (1) functional 150 amino acid protein chain forming by chance is 1/10^164. It has been calculated that the probability of DNA forming by chance is 1/10^119,000. The probability of random chance protein-protein linkages in a cell is 1/10^79,000,000,000. Based on just these three cellular components, it would be far more Rational and Reasonable to conclude that the cell was not formed by un-directed random natural processes. Note: Abiogenesis Hypothesis posits that un-directed random natural processes, i.e. random chance formation, of molecules led to living organisms. Natural selection has no effect on individual atoms and molecules on the micro scale in a prebiotic environment. (*For reference, peptides/proteins can vary in size from 3 amino acid chains to 34,000 amino acid chains. Some scientists consider 300-400 amino acid protein chains to be the average size. There are 42,000,000 protein molecules in just one (1) simple cell, each protein requiring precise assembly. There are approx. 30,000,000,000,000 cells in the human body.) Of all the physical laws and constants, just the Cosmological Constant alone is tuned to a level of 1/10^120; not to mention the fine-tuning of the Mass-Energy distribution of early universe which is 1/10^10^123. Therefore, in the fine-tuning argument, it would be more Rational and Reasonable to conclude that the multi-verse is not the correct answer. On the other hand, it has been scientifically proven numerous times that Consciousness does indeed collapse the wave function to cause information waves of probability/potentiality to become particle/matter with 1/1 probability. A rational and reasonable person could therefore conclude that the answer is consciousness. A "Miracle" is considered to be an event with a probability of occurrence of 1/10^6. Abiogenesis, RNA World Hypothesis, and Multiverse would all far, far, far exceed any "Miracle". Yet, these extremely irrational and unreasonable hypotheses are what some of the world’s top scientists ‘must’ believe in because of a prior commitment to a strictly arbitrary, subjective, biased, narrow, limiting, materialistic ideology / worldview. Every idea, number, concept, thought, theory, mathematical equation, abstraction, qualia, etc. existing within and expressed by anyone is "Immaterial" or "Non-material". The very idea or concept of "Materialism" is an immaterial entity and by it's own definition does not exist. Modern science seems to be stuck in archaic, subjective, biased, incomplete ideologies that have inadequately attempted to define the "nature of reality" or the "reality of nature" for millennia. A Paradigm Shift in ‘Science’ is needed for humanity to advance. A major part of this Science Paradigm Shift would be the formal acknowledgment by the scientific community of the existence of "Immaterial" or "Non-material" entities as verified and confirmed by observation of the universe and discoveries in Quantum Physics.)

[@kenadams5504]

Without Einstein's work discovering Quantum Entanglement mathematically , these 3 men would not have proven it experimentally.They still deserve their recognition , but we shouldnt describe their achievement as proving Einstein wrong .

[@VijayGupta-cz4ef]

PicoPhysics: Modern physics has matured over time. The basics of which were arrived at with knowledge available at those times. So is the case with interpretations of results of special relativity. PicoPhysics based on the Unary Law "Space Contains Kenergy" establishes relativity from the first principle -"Unary Law". As it re-establishes the concepts of modern science It replaces probability with possibility and equivalence with simultaneity. In PicoPhysics laws derived from "Unary Law" are universal not limited in applicability. So they are universally true. Einstein can not be proved wrong when correctly read with the help of PicoPhysics.

[@robertnewberry7799]

First, congratulations to the Prize winners! Job well done, bravo, etc. A round of brandy, or perhaps a nicely aged scotch on the rocks with a beer chaser. Is there an online application? My work also involves Entanglent as well as Superposition. Is there a category for opening a portal to a heretofore undiscovered dimension? I have done an empirical study and have already provided my findings to ABC News Chief Meteorologist Ginger Zee. Thank you.

[@abhaychacko6018]

Could we consider entangled particle as one wavefunction, with opposite superposition for each particle 🤔,so that the spin always stays complementary upon measurement,and in superposition state too? 🤔 I mean one in up down up down superposition and the other in down up ,down up superposition? 😬😬

[@kk-xs3do]

Aether

[@krzysztofciuba271]

Only some textbooks point it out; the rest is a pedagogical disaster as scientists are philosophical morons. A "particle" is not an object - it is a term attached to a portion/quanta of energy described by the Schrodinger wave function, etc.

[@abhaychacko6018]

@@kk-xs3do 🤔

[@kenadams5504]

Maybe

[@jp5248]

Congratulations

[@agressivepandit]

Professor Brian greene, i watch all your videos.

[@joshua3171]

Congratulations 👍

[@markberman6708]

In order for the universe's probability matrix to work there must be entanglement. Read that somewhere, seems to make intuitive sense on some level. Just as time cannot actually be circular or it breaks the probability flow. Read from some sci-fi book or another.

[@smlanka4u]

The quantum entanglement shows us that not only time, but also distance is relative.

[@stianmathisen4284]

This is true!

[@smlanka4u]

@@stianmathisen4284, Quantum entanglement is a mathematical and/or geometrical communication. Therefore, those elementary particles don't feel the distance between them. A binary mathematical theory would show how points in space communicate.!

[@stianmathisen4284]

@@smlanka4u Zeilinger has proven QE to be physical real!

[@smlanka4u]

@@stianmathisen4284, Yes, it is real, and it is an ongoing instant communication.!

[@zibam982]

Time and distance are the same thing.

[@TheMaddmann]

Amazing!

[@temurkhoshimov8082]

Hello Mr, Can I copy your videos in order to translate it to Uzbek language? For young physics

[@isaacgarza3307]

I liked to know whose measure the one at particle that’s far away? This like Monty’s 3 doors !! You get the response you think is correct because you know they are entangled !!! But if some who didn’t know how would he measure the one father away??

[@willj3ff]

Please tell me why Brian Greens thought process was removed from the introduction. Follow we! I’ll find it.

[@z.khatibi7858]

got goosebumps

[@KAT-dg6el]

Back in 2004 there was a movie released called; What the bleep do we know? Even though I wished it would’ve been more of a documentary it talks about this. Lots of people blew it off and called it BS.

[@djayjp]

Because it absolutely is BS. It's pseudoscience. Please read the Wikipedia article titled, "Quantum Mysticism". Also remember that science isn't science until results have been independently replicated.

[@WaxPaper]

Oh, it's still complete BS. The people who created it are new age grifters. The work of these scientists has nothing to do with anything suggested in that movie.

[@limaot8304]

The Nobel Prize makes human beings rethink their understanding of the existenc, destiny and consciousness. Are we witnessing a turning point in history, when the natural sciences and the occult reach the same goal by different routes? Perhaps the cosmic truth sought by modern people has long been discovered by the ancients. Who doesn't love the uncertainty of life?

[@Will-tl8uo]

This sounds very plausible, but what do I know

[@_kantor_]

Great but what have they done exactly?

[@manjitkaur812]

Amazing! On third day after my beloved son left his body in the road accident in Hermosillo Mexico while working with GE energy,I have seen the bluish white light encircling near the door of my bedroom then I closed my eyes and felt my term was full of divine pure light and I got healing impact.What was that?

[@tatearnold6785]

I’m sorry you lost your son. The more I learn about this quantum science, the more I believe that we are all eternally connected to each other. Information, matter, and energy lives on-I’m sure you will feel the energy of your son throughout your life. Much love

[@manjitkaur812]

Thanks for your kind words.I always feels his energy 🙏

[@Rico-Suave_]

Watched all of it

[@RaulMoreno_Musica]

if they show that those entangled subatomic particles exist it would be nice, because mathematically it is very easy to show that they are not different particles but the same thing all the time with different frequencies... (yes: quatum physics makes no sense)

[@drsurendravikramgoswami1152]

Is homoeopathy medicine can be teleport from a distance through hair??

[@nandakumarcheiro]

This time Quatum mechanics supports Occultic science with quantum force at a distance proves strangely spooky action at a distance proved by Christ Dhakshinamoorthy swamigal,Tho Paa swamigal and Chattambi swamigal of Vadiveeswaram who changed even the basic click chemistry of Nobel prize winners.

[@mehmetedex]

we're let hyped by the news, rather than given any actual info how its really done summary of modern science

[@markgrayson7514]

Titled subject is mentioned at 6:27 for 30 seconds. Prize winners are turned into background art for a moment. Nothing is said about them.

[@flutterland4913]

Amazing

[@deepdrag8131]

Green spent 98% of this video giving background we’ve all heard thousands of times and 2% simply naming the recipients of the 2022 prize without telling us anything about them or the work they did. I clicked on because I wanted to learn something new, something current. Didn’t work out that way.

[@ermiasawoke192]

Awesome!

[@dustykappus8030]

Thanks for sharing! ;-)

[@ricardogutierrezferrer1885]

Excellent!!!!

[@roelrovira5148]

Brian, Quantum Entanglement is real not only at microscopic/subatomic scale but also at macroscopic cosmic scale. We now have a working Quantum Theory of Gravity that is testable and complete with reproducible empirical experiments with the same results if repeated over and over again and again, confirmed by empirical observations in nature with 7-Sigma level results, guided by empirical laws and physical/mathematical equations that are predictive and precise. FYI: Quantum Gravity or Quantum Gravitation have three types that are equivalent to and manifested by Quantum Gravitational Entanglement - a Quantum Entanglement at Macroscopic Cosmic Scale namely: 1. Quantum Anti-Gravity = Spin Up Quantum Entanglement State; 2. Quantum Neutral Gravity = Superposition Quantum Entanglement State; and 3. Quantum Gravity = Spin Down Quantum Entanglement State. More detailed information could be found on the published papers 2 years ago in London, Paris, and Zurich, online and at the two scientific Journals ACADEMIA and REAL TRUE NATURE or alternatively, you can google the name of the author ROEL REAL ROVIRA

[@damightyom]

So say I am completely alone and facing forward. According to this video there is an infinity of undetermined possibility behind me that remains that way because it is unobserved. Either that or spooky action at a distance is determining every particle of my mind and body's position and I have no free will. It has to be either/or but not both, and there is no other option? Am I correct? Can someone clarify this for me?

[@thestonemaroc]

The imagery did a lot to help me grasp what these brilliant physicists are talking about. Otherwise, this psychologist would be lost in the quantum sauce.

[@Will-tl8uo]

LMAO lost in the quantum sauce for real

[@O0o__.]

the string theory (is still alive) so, entanglement, and quantum teleportation for some reason makes sense to me, synchronicity in way, but you said..a world w out the need for probabilities ..that statement isn't something that sits well in my mind is scary depressing.

[@vanikaghajanyan7760]

This prize is not yet the end of the series of recent years, where the Nobel Prize in physics (!) was awarded to astronomers, mathematicians, climatologists: it looks like astrologers are in line.

[@xyzxyzxyzxyz636]

🤣

[@Simplifiedsd]

Mind = Blown

[@oneshot2028]

6:53 - Hype as usual!

[@RechtmanDon]

The Zen of Science: Everyday Science discovers answers. Good Science discovers questions. Definition discovered by Don Orfeo, 28 May, 2019

[@gmxmatei]

Instead of talking about ghosts we could see a real fundamental invention -- Universal Software Model .... the future Nobel Prize!

[@Pyr0blast]

So, what kind of daily life tools will be there using the quantum entanglement in the future?

[@25_26]

faster than light data transfer by quantum teleportation which leads to calling information from the future.

[@HHIto]

Huge!