Рет қаралды 830
In this second installment of "Rabbi Moshe Shulman on REASONS Why Jesus DID NOT Fulfill Messianic PROPHECIES" we cover the following Christian three claims regarding Jesus of Nazareth:
1. The Messiah would be from the line of David (Jeremiah 23:5, 33:15)
Apologists are not wrong that this was a genuine messianic expectation. The Messiah definitely was supposed to be a descendant of King David, as that was a requirement for any king to sit on the throne of Judah. Whether Jesus was a descendant of King David, however, is hard to know, as the genealogies presented in Matthew 1:1-16 and Luke 3:23-38 contradict each other.
2. The Messiah would be born in Bethlehem (Micah 5:2)
It isn’t clear whether the Messiah was supposed to actually be born in Bethlehem, or this is just a reiteration of the requirement for the Messiah to be from the line of King David, since David’s hometown was Bethlehem (1 Samuel 17:12). Either way, most scholars doubt the accuracy of the accounts in Matthew 2 and Luke 2, which claim that Jesus was born in Bethlehem, due to the many contradictions and historical problems. Furthermore, John 7:42 implies Jesus was not born in Bethlehem.
The birthplace of the Messiah was often discussed among the Jewish people in the New Testament. Some believed Jesus was born in Nazareth, where he spent his formative years. In John 1:46, Nathanael questioned this by saying, "Can anything good come out of Nazareth?" The implied answer was "no," especially for the Messiah.
Yet others, perhaps not as well steeped in traditional teaching, seemed to be agnostic about the Messiah’s birthplace: “When the Christ [Messiah] appears, no one will know where he comes from” (John 7:27).
3. The Messiah would be born of a virgin (Isaiah 7:14)
This verse isn’t about the Messiah, it’s about a child born in the 8th century BC as a sign for King Ahaz that the coalition of Northern Israel and Syria will not destroy his kingdom: “For before the boy knows how to refuse the evil and choose the good, the land whose two kings you dread will be deserted” (verse 16). The word in Hebrew עלמה translated as “virgin” actually just means “young woman.” There is no virgin birth here, nor is it referring to the Messiah.
Michael Brown, a Jewish believer in Jesus who has studied ancient Near Eastern languages, offers the following helpful point about the word almah: “While the word ‘almah can refer to a virgin, it does not specifically mean ‘virgin.’ Its basic meaning is primarily related to adolescence, not sexual chastity.” (For his detailed reasons, see Michael L. Brown, Answering Jewish Objections to Jesus, vol. 3, Messianic Prophecy Objections, section 4.3.)
Timeline:
00:00:00:00 - 00:14:13:26 Introduction and summary of first three covered during last episode.
00:14:13:26 - 00:41:12:09 The Messiah would be from the line of David
00:41:12:09 - 00:43:12:04 The Messiah would be born in Bethlehem
01:03:11:28 - 02:02:46:26 The Messiah would be born of a Virgin
Check out Moshe Shulman's KZbin Channel and Website for more information!
/ @mosheshulman8305
judaismsanswer...