I have bought one and Im currently waiting for another to be built. Keep in mind that many Jeep owners add lifts, 37"-40" tires, heavy armor, bumpers, and winches. The power of the 392 laughs at the added weight while the V6 becomes even more of a dog that it already is, even with deeper gears. Jeep was also smart by making the Rubicon 392 full time 4WD which helps to efficiently put all the power to the ground. The Hellcat Rubicon you drove was 2WD which allowed the power to over power the chassis.
@RacerX92 жыл бұрын
Definitely an interesting perspective.. if you added all those things then I could definitely justify the 6.4..
@DefinitelyNotYouThankGod2 жыл бұрын
I have a 2021 with the 3.6 and it has plenty of power! I was very impressed to be truthful. I know the older ones were Royal turds 💩!!
@joshreynolds7292 жыл бұрын
@@DefinitelyNotYouThankGod they been using the 3.6 since 2012 with the same pentistar output 285crank hp and 260 tq as the 2021. I’m pretty sure the only thing changed was gearing and trans therefore it’s always been a slow 💩 and slow in comparison to any v8. Also over priced. Never understood the following. Only one I like is the track hawk for apparent reason. 392 is s the way they needed to come the whole time as a base for cheaper.
@BitcoinTo150K2 жыл бұрын
Gravity is still real no matter what engine you drop in
@jeepchronicles56442 жыл бұрын
@@joshreynolds729 the 8-spd made the biggest to the feel of 3.6l. My 6spd manual still sucks lol
@ENCAGED792 жыл бұрын
Just seeing the 392 Rubicon puts a huge smile on my face.I love the concept. Kudos to Mopar for pulling this off. To be honest, I would rather buy an older Jeep and drop a 392 crate motor in it.
@mini2nut672 жыл бұрын
A fairly loaded 3.6L V6 Wrangler stickers for around $65k. Another $13k gets you the 392 engine, Fox suspension, larger brakes, steel knuckles, CV joints, beefed up transmission, 392 exclusive leather seats, all of the safety groups, re-engineered ladder frame, etc. What owners are REALLY paying for is the exclusively, resale value and the satisfying V8 rumble that puts a smile on every owners face when pushing on the fun pedal.
@doloressalgado34272 жыл бұрын
Finally a smart person everything is expensive doesn't matter what car you have but most people online talk crap can't afford them still live with mom and dad
@doloressalgado34272 жыл бұрын
What happened to your wife she could drive and had a great smile
@rideintothesun81062 жыл бұрын
You can get a decently optioned Jeep Sahara with turbo 4 for low 40s. Swap that out for 5.7 hemi and your under 50, 000. The 5.7 is more than enough power for a Jeep.
@joshreynolds7292 жыл бұрын
@@doloressalgado3427 65k for anything that’s heavy and comes with 285 hp and no update in power since 2012 when it came out is not worth the money. And I payed way more for my hellcat than that and support myself in my own house happily married. When these should have never even been made with the 3.6 to begin with.
@ChrisH4212 жыл бұрын
@@rideintothesun8106 what are you talking about a base Sahara starts at $43.5k once you add a couple of options your in the high 40s. When you do your hemi swap you're going to have to replace the transmission to since niethier the manual or auto was designed to handle a v8,and then you'd still be missing all the axle, brake, suspension, and more upgrades.
@sheaallen78392 жыл бұрын
I absolutely LOVE my Rubicon 392. But definitely a niche vehicle. I thought about the TRX, but in the end kept my Denali HD diesel and purchased the 392 for play. I smile every time I get in it and floor it!
@boldrbangr98342 жыл бұрын
It makes sense to me. A similarly equipped V6 Rubicon is over $60,000. Those who calculated the cost of a used (not new) 392 & trans + needed parts at $4-5000 are way underestimating all the costs needed to make the swap. I think you'd be way closer to $10,000 if you do all of the work yourself & end up with a used drive train. Maybe you could recoup a little by selling the old drive train. Having professionals do the new 392 swap will add $35,000 - $40,000, so you're right where the factory 392 cost (or more) with no factory warranty, etc. To me, buying a new factory 392 is a no brainer.
@beehive1412 жыл бұрын
I bought one and I'll tell anybody to get it also. The jeep is the best vehicle right now it's amazing !!
@The_Draque2 жыл бұрын
The price is too goddamn high for these
@corradoparris96792 жыл бұрын
There going to price themselves out of business.
@1titans2 жыл бұрын
@@corradoparris9679 but they aren’t. People are ordering them all the time
@scottleggejr8 ай бұрын
@@1titansno they aren't. The demand is limited production not demand. They don't make enough of these to keep the price high
@KEN-du2iz2 жыл бұрын
Agree 5.7 should be a option. Biggest down side for me is the fact you have to buy the best version to get that engine. 2nd down side is 90k is hellcat engine level. So it would be a hard no at that price point. Would love to see a 5.7 at least in the Gladiator. When lifting these vehicles it's such a drag to see how much effort the engine has go through with the V6 even with gears. Honestly need all the help they can get.
@scottleggejr8 ай бұрын
Never made any sense 🙄
@elmothedoggy3 ай бұрын
Drive a 392 then say put a smaller engine. I will never sell my 392 wrangler it's that good
@knarfluna2 жыл бұрын
Great Jeep. Great options …what gets me is that you always say would you spend this cash for this Jeep if you’re not in a mountainous region. Or in the sticks. But what I say is….born and raised in Chicago …with hot summers, which the roof is perfect for…and tough tough winters..which the 4x4 is perfect for…why wouldn’t it be right for the upper Midwest in the burbs? This area has the worst streets…with pavement buckles, potholes, uneven surfaces. I gave up owning a car in Chicago…the suspension gets torn to shreds…you need a vehicle like this to handle these ‘off-road’ like conditions even though you’re not in the woods. I feel you guys miss the connection and should stress that more…I don’t need to off-road…but if you’re in Chicago, Jersey,New York, Boston. These have got to be the best option to handle the urban terrain…which can be just as deadly as the trails…believe it or not…great stuff X
@KC27386 Жыл бұрын
Not sure what this guy is talking about. I bought mine a week ago and drove it 300 miles home through the Smokey mountains and it handled like a dream. The paddle shifters are awesome and I didn’t have any issues. I pretty sure this was the same guy that said the TRX was sketchy to drive, that’s my daily driver…so to each his own.
@jnovakit5 ай бұрын
I like how the TRX gets a little squirrely at WOT.
@WoolfJ352 жыл бұрын
I'm usually all for the Heminsanity but a 5.7 would have been perfect and if that's where Jeep is going to go with it cool but a 6.4 in a Wrangler isn't going to make much sense for anyone largely due to the price, because after markups you could just get a TRX or Jailbreak.
@ryanarchibald29072 жыл бұрын
Wrangler is so much more practical than either of those. You can’t drive the jailbreak around me year round. The trx is just too damn big
@fitfogey2 жыл бұрын
Yeah but the TRX also has a truck bed. The Rubicon obviously does not. That’s huge for a lot of people.
@SangermanSwag2 жыл бұрын
You’re gonna pay a mark up on both the TRX and the Jail Break
@MrRjezonie2 жыл бұрын
I got mine at MSRP no markup. Hell I’m ready for more power so getting a tune soon. 4.88s tomorrow! On 37s now. Would hate it in a weak 5.7.
@WoolfJ352 жыл бұрын
@@MrRjezonie hey if you got at MSRP than props to you, and for your setup the 6.4 makes total sense lol. That setup sounds like it's going to be sick
@Unc0mmonSense2 жыл бұрын
I am picking up my 392XR on Friday. It is like Jeeps version of a G Wagon imho. I always liked Jeeps but never bought one because they lacked power and some other features I wanted in a daily driver. Now I can get a great utilitarian vehicle with off road styling AND power. It has just enough luxury, like heated seats/steering wheel and ACC, but still bare bones enough so i can hose it out. Everything I want in an SUV. Yeah, it is a little pricey but I think it is worth it. You can barely find one under $100k on a lot. They haven't made a lot of them and you can no longer even order one for '22. '23 will likely be last year of the 392 (replaced by the HO Hurricaine). It is a special car.
@av8orAH64 Жыл бұрын
I bought the 392 XR and absolutely love this thing. If this is a niche vehicle then I must be the target demographic. It has all the chops found on the standard Rubicon but bonus...it screams. What other vehicle can you go anywhere and enjoy front and rear locking diffs, swaybar disconnect, nice appointments, lifted from the OEM with 35s, bead-lock capable bronze wheels, a beefed up chassis, and a 6.4 Hemi that takes you from 0-60 in 4.2 with 4.56 gears. WOW! So whether you roll on the streets, or in the bush this is one capable and insanely fun vehicle. I hear that it has a stereo. I would not know because I keep the One-Touch top open to listen to the Glorius exhaust notes coming from the back. Thanks, Jeep!
@CwGriff5 ай бұрын
would you trade a loaded 2020 Grand Cherokee SRT for it? considering but torn
@j.r.7772 жыл бұрын
I ordered my first Jeep ever at the end of November in 2020. I ordered a 2021 JL Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon. I ordered mine with the 3.6 liter V-6 w/ eTorque. About 2 weeks after I ordered my Jeep the 392 was announced. I was so freaking bummed. And then the Extreme Recon package was also announced too. Had I known those things I would have waited a few months and ordered a 392 with an Extreme Recon package. But oh well. Other than the eTorque, I love almost everything about my Jeep. It is definitely the most capable off road vehicle that I have ever owned. I do need to buy another truck though after I pay off my Jeep because I used the heck out of my trucks in the past. But that’s still another 2 to 3 years away.
@michaeldawson40872 жыл бұрын
Buying a 392 is a no-brainer choice. The resale value on used 392's are going higher than the markup on new ones. Jeep has cut off all 392 orders atm no one knows if they will open for MY23. Prices for existing new and used are going through the roof. Mine sits in my garage, it's going to be kept stock and low miles and no offroading. I have other jeeps to wheel and drive...the 392 is special and will be one of rare jeeps and why I bought it.
@1titans2 жыл бұрын
Funny you say that. I have on order with no markup but, the dealer had one on the lot somebody returned with 400 miles on it. Those are the ones being marked up, which they did. And they will resale very high because of the rarity factor. Unfortunately, I don’t have the discipline and will drive it into the ground.
@LamontBoucherville2 жыл бұрын
The 392 wrangler is the best Dodge Product in my opinion. Power of a muscle car and utility of an suv
@gmobb47732 жыл бұрын
Hardly an suv.
@WoolfJ352 жыл бұрын
SRT Durango ,Grand Cherokee, and the Hellcat Durango and Trackhawk all existed for awhile now lol
@mini2nut672 жыл бұрын
The 6.4L engine in a small Wrangler was Jeeps way of giving the middle finger to the world. It makes no practical sense but I’m glad they made it. Jeep leadership still has a sense of humor, every other legacy manufacturer leader would have laughed this idea out of the office.
@joshreynolds7292 жыл бұрын
Yeah I disagree when the hellcat motor comes in other platforms. Jeeps to me have always been overrated and to damn expensive even if it comes with a v6 and they still want 60k when it’s worth 20-40. Then they put the 392 in it that’s being phased out for a reason for way more when a scat can be had for less with less weight. If your going to spend the money I would just get the Durango hellcat, track hawk, or trx. Not saying it’s not nice just to expensive and hard to find for what it is to be middle of the tracks in the upper segment of payments. And dodge always acts like they are lambos when you try to look at them or they just don’t help you. I wanted an suv for my wife but all the Big 3 dealers don’t want to help you and if they do then no deals are given at all or they don’t want to let you test drive them. Shit I’ve even driven up in a hellcat and barely got help. I now understand why people buy Hondas. they actually help you and they are cheaper on fuel, lighter, plus last unlike dodge products. And with gas prices the way they are and all dodge products being heavy sales will go down.
@gmobb47732 жыл бұрын
@@joshreynolds729 you just a karen
@nathansummerville39722 жыл бұрын
I love that Jeep built it! I hate that they priced it so high. What I really want is a mini TRX with the 392 for about $60k.
@princesstee38182 жыл бұрын
Anything Mopar is going to be double priced sadly
@tallballer092 жыл бұрын
Beggars can’t be choosers.
@platec47982 жыл бұрын
I just wish the interior was more bare bones and utilitarian. I don't drive a Jeep because I want it to be like a Cadillac Escalade. I drive a Jeep because I like the utilitarianism aspect. Plate C
@justpray3652 жыл бұрын
Jeep would have sold a bazillion 5.7l Jeeps.
@RacerX92 жыл бұрын
Probably so 👍
@Chief_52 жыл бұрын
And then we could’ve supercharged them!
@bobforpples2 жыл бұрын
Not the way they’re pricing other jeeps
@sofaking_gr83 ай бұрын
i just bought one yesterday and waiting for the delivery. Thank you for the awesome information
@MrLew19652 жыл бұрын
Ok!! I seen one at a dealership up here in Toronto, Canada for $138K + %13 Tax...COME ON !! $150K over the curb ?? Are we on earth here ?/
@sstevocamaro2 жыл бұрын
A 5.7 Hemi would have been cheaper and more practical imo.
@R3vokenDallout1on2 жыл бұрын
i been sayin this since the 392 dropped
@mini2nut672 жыл бұрын
Jeep leadership wanted the V8 Wrangler to go out with a bang, hence the 6.4L engine. 2023 will most likely be the last year it is offered before it goes the way of the Do Do bird.
@MrDutch1e2 жыл бұрын
The price difference would be minimal. Look at the cost difference between a base rt and a base scatpack for charger or challenger.
@jtc1964x2 жыл бұрын
5.7 is a weak motor, no thanks
@mudshotit2 жыл бұрын
@@jtc1964x actually… thats backwards lol
@rockyp5442 жыл бұрын
Agreed on a specific type of person. I find myself putting seat covers on after the gym lol. I have a work truck so it’s my weekend vehicle. Hell I don’t even eat in it. I’d say maybe as I see some wear & tear, then I’ll gradually lay off the OCD mindset. But I’d your a hard working person that you know this is what you deserve and it makes you feel good, the price isn’t bad. Especially these days. I love it. ✌️
@toddwatkins96662 жыл бұрын
I LOVE that vehicle!!! When I first saw they were making that and video I said I wanted one!!! But me living in the Northeast I STILL can’t fathom paying like 90 racks for something that doesn’t have a Hellcat on the side of it… I think I may wait and get a pre-owned one at the end of next year as my retirement gift for myself 😂😂
@stevedolan50652 жыл бұрын
My Dad had a CJ-5 back in the 60’s…indeed we cleaned it out with a hose. If I recall correctly it had a 4 banger. Not much power, but it was geared so low we could go up and down really steep grades easily. It just kinda slowly pulled you up those steep hills. It was reliable and built to withstand just about anything. But driving on the street was very much like torture. This thing you just tested looks like it would be a real hoot to drive both on and off road, but I don’t think you could really put that much power to use off road unless you were in some kind of desert race. I like Rubicons and I love Hemis…but unless I hit the lotto I don’t think this would be great investment. Just my $.02. I enjoyed the video and your insight.
@mattskillman2 жыл бұрын
One thing you didn't touch on was the fuel demands of the Rubicon 392. Obviously with the lower MPG because of the 6.4L, you're going to burn through a lot of what that 392 requires, and that's Premium grade fuel. As much as I wanted a 392 when they came out, I had a feeling that fuel prices were going to increase eventually, and being that you have to put Premium fuel in the tank, that was the deal breaker for me. Had they gone with a 5.7 like in my Ram Rebel, that would have been easier on MPG and fuel costs. When they start dropped the I6 Hurricane in these, that'll be a game changer.
@mikecarter9080 Жыл бұрын
I've owned my 2006 Jeep TJ Wrangler Rubicon since new. I've ordered my 2024 Jeep 392 Rubicon and can't wait for it to arrive!
@jeepin1232 жыл бұрын
I looked for months and went into the dealership in person to negotiate. Being pre approved and on the lot in person adds to that negotiation power. The msrp on mine was 85,600 i paid 82,000 for a new 2022 with the recon package.
@ixT0PSH0TZxi2 жыл бұрын
Gotta throw some content on that bad boy. You paid a pretty penny for it, why not show some cool content for it?
@ixT0PSH0TZxi2 жыл бұрын
@That V8 Life I’d hope there’s a video. Kickass cars you got btw 👍🏼 The SS caught my eye the most, badass Bronco you got tho 🤝
@1smokan Жыл бұрын
There are plenty of folks with built jeeps costing well over 100K, I am one of them. The Wrangler 392 gives me what I want and that is power, the V6 is gutless with big tires and I don't like diesels or the turbo lagging 4 banger. Yes I would spend the money on a 392 Wrangler, also looking at future collectability and the fact that these will keep there value well over any hellcat which I also own.
@Tritium1775 Жыл бұрын
Freaking zero regrets I absolutely LOVE my 24 392. OffRoad+ turns it into a whole different street beast with pops and burbles
@ca78892 жыл бұрын
I appreciate your content-I like to hear the different views on the 392, brings me to reality that I don't even want it-the cabin is the same as all other wranglers, despise leather so wouldn't have that either and I'm really a speednut but I can get that in my challenger. I know this is for some folks, have yet to really see one on a trail or even someone that really likes it other than you tube. But anyone that happens to be Speed Racers brother I'm listening.
@Sim1TheOne2 жыл бұрын
I LOVE my 392XR! I even traded my beloved built JKU for it. I was hoping it would be closer to 60k… However, I think its worth the cost if you look at the price of other new cars. This is a special edition vehicle, so of course the price is “special”. It’s a smooth riding go anywhere sleeper! Plus the MPG is basically the same as my JKU was. It’s definitely a niche vehicle, but it checked all my boxes (e.g. V8, small SUV, AWD, 4WD, rugged, fast, mod-able, Wrangler) Also, where are these low priced TRXs at???
@jamesfrank8228 Жыл бұрын
Do they take food stamps? :)
@peterspakosky96478 ай бұрын
Lol, probably would need food stamps after buying one. Monthly payment would be 1000+
@ixibladeixi26392 жыл бұрын
Nice video . No thanks for 5.7. Finally pulled the trigger. I just ordered 2023 392XR. Can't wait. We gotta pay to play.
@Alteris852 жыл бұрын
One of these 392 Jeeps came to the shop I work at yesterday. I didn't believe it had a 392 in it because there's a fake one riding around with the 3.6 just with 392 badges and the hood on it.
@gingerthetrailpup72232 жыл бұрын
Honestly, I have always been a Trailhawk fan … but wanting to upgrade to a V8 / hemp and as of 2023, they are going electric 😳 on the Trailhawk … so here I am checking out the Rubicon … and not disappointed.
@308loneeagle72 жыл бұрын
Seems nowadays it’s hard to even find a 5.7 Grand Cherokee. In ‘13 the dealer had both the 3.6 and 5.7 lined up for a test drive. Did the 5.7 first and had no interest in even trying the V6 after that. I think a 5.7 in a Wrangler would have been just perfect (but not for me @ 6’7” and 280lbs I wouldn’t know how to fold me into the driver seat). Currently drive a RAM… would have loved the 392 option without having to go straight to TRX. That said, considering the money I’ve thrown at it so far and I’m not even done, I could and should have had a TRX (got my ‘19 Laramie dec ‘18).
@mritorresli65232 жыл бұрын
Thought I found one for 75k online only to find out the dealership threw a 30k markup on it and ruined my dreams of owning one. So I'll keep my widebody 392 Charger and eventually just get a regular Jeep Sahara, and throw a Ripp Supercharger in it
@joshreynolds7292 жыл бұрын
Yeah it’s bull how these dodge dealers act. Same story in ford and Chevy. Just buy from a private seller and cut those ass hats out they don’t deserve to screw america anymore. You got a dream make it happen.
@1titans2 жыл бұрын
Don’t buy off the lot. Have the dealer order it
@rickmulcahy62792 жыл бұрын
You never got around to what you said you were going to do... which was talking about the things that jeep Finally corrected on this on this Jeep
@budzlightyear22122 жыл бұрын
With 4doors and epic Jeep capabilities matched w/a 392. This has got to be the best Jeep ever made. Would love to hear this beast on a hill climb or rock 🪨 crawling...
@asdf515012 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love it, but don't think it's quite worth the price. Do I want one? Yep! Will I buy one? Probably not.
@ZACKSONFIRE2 жыл бұрын
I like the barebones look of my JK; less to be ruined. It has AC, power windows, and only 200 or so horsepowers haha (and half of that with the AC on). 0-60 in about a minute but my steel bumper helps manage traffic flow just fine.
@MatthiasNyberg11 ай бұрын
Does anyone know if it's possible to import the 392 Hemi version to Europe?
@MBailey19772 жыл бұрын
I think more would sell with a 5.7 which is plenty of power. Also never understood why people complain about the interior of a Jeep? It's meant to go off road and have fun. Cars are made for nice interiors!
@hubriswonk2 жыл бұрын
Right! My jeep has 4.5 lift with 35, cloth top no windows and I cannot even recall the last time I checked to see if the AC works!
@donsmith30384 ай бұрын
Just bought one to keep at the lakehouse. Front pocket money. Awesome Jeep.
@leemen2 жыл бұрын
The 392 is the most bang for the buck rubicon you can order. 392 package comes with so much more then just the engine. And on 40 inch tires and Dana 60s with a 4.88 gear I average 15.5 mpg. Worth ever penny!!
@Skidz752 жыл бұрын
The 5.7 has been out now for like 100 years. Why Chrysler/Jeep/MOPAR/FCA/Daimler/Noww Stella….have they NEVER slapped a 5.7 in the wrangler?? The 6 cyl for YEAAAAARRSS!! Why I never even contemplated buying one. Then when they do put a v8 in it, they go 80k and 6.4? And wait until gas is climbing and V8’s are on the way out. It’s madness I tel you! 😉
@kennymiller82172 жыл бұрын
So alot of Sahara owners argue their suspension is the same as a Rubicon , that true . I always thought a Rubicon was made with heavier parts ?
@johnnyzippo71099 ай бұрын
Long Tube Headers ? Can long tube headers have enough clearance to fit on this vehicle ? Shorty headers for sure but long tube ? Noting if longtubes do not fit , shortys make zero benefit , it probably essentially has shortys .
@markremy49462 жыл бұрын
Why didn't they put the Boss 429 in it???
@markwicke92912 жыл бұрын
I would love a Wrangler Sport with a 5.7. It would probably be a little more practical. The 392 is just way out of my price range!!
@FieldWorxoverlandadventures2 жыл бұрын
Yes I would spend 97,000 on a Rubicon 392, I’m jeep guy and I think it’s the perfect Jeep and within about a week I’m just deciding on which color to get I’m ordering one,, thanks for the video buddy👍
@dragvan19372 жыл бұрын
Like the 392 but would rather see a 5.7 version for the cost alone. Same exact vehicle only with the 5.7. And with the cost of gas 5.7 the 3.6 just doesn't get out of it's own way.
@MrDutch1e2 жыл бұрын
The base cost of vehicles like the challenger or charger on 5.7 vs 6.4 is only a couple thousand. It's just harder to find the 6.4 version without a ton of extras nowadays because there just aren't a lot of vehicle being made.
@joshgonzalez21122 жыл бұрын
Exactly! The 5.7 even sounds better.
@rayrussell60642 жыл бұрын
I don't own any jeep product or have the wants for one but I think they would have been better off if they stuffed a 5.7 in it due to gas prices fuel mileage and insurance purposes I agree they needed a v8 but at almost 100k I could justify one if I was to buy at a 100k it would be a trx just makes more sense to me I don't rock crawl and the use of a pick up I do have. Awesome content RACER-X and as always be safe 👍
@wranglerlife4ever422 жыл бұрын
Those are not 33” tires (you said wheels but you meant tires)….this has the XR package which has 17x8 beadlock capable wheels with 315/70 tires (about a 35” tire) vs the 285/70 tires (about a 33” tire)
@Ih8chew2 жыл бұрын
Why is everyone saying it should have a 5.7? That engine is ridiculously underpowered for its size by today’s standards and the gas mileage isn’t that far off from the 392. It makes complete sense for Stellantis to use the 392 as the last hurrah for 8 cylinder Wranglers. What doesn’t make sense is how expensive this thing is.
@nickkostakis96002 жыл бұрын
Great show mate and a good job explaining everything about the car good on you
@chadpittman78262 жыл бұрын
Awesome content buddy 👍💪
@adam_gonzz2 жыл бұрын
I still want one. I’ll have to trade my Rubicon 21 for the 392. Hearing the power on it will be awesome.
@VMAFIA2 жыл бұрын
The interior is pretty much identical too any other similar speced jl don't really know what you meant by that?
@nazarethperez97602 жыл бұрын
That thing rips. It rumbles perfectly. Fast too
@nomaam-br5492 жыл бұрын
We need more people to buy these outrageously expensive Jeeps and suffer the depreciation loss so others can buy them with low mileage and much lower cost.
@MegaPusheen232 жыл бұрын
I wish they’d at least put twin turbos on it or give it a motor like the one in the trackhawk
@remywonderland75072 жыл бұрын
here in Hawaii, regular rubicons are stickered at over 80k. Heck, RT 5.7 challengers are 50k LOL Even if I'm not gonna get a 392 rubicon, I'm afraid to see how much it's marked up over here😬
@DefinitelyNotYouThankGod2 жыл бұрын
I ordered a 392 Rubi last year… once it came in and let the $83,000 out the door sink in i ended up passing… its just way to much loot for a Jeep in my book. Another AWESOME upload X!
@peterspakosky96478 ай бұрын
I am a Jeep lover and rock crawler and I would definitely rock crawl this monster.
@putz1732 жыл бұрын
in Canada the jump from a 2.0t loaded Rubicon to the 392 is ~30000$ lol
@danramirez42902 жыл бұрын
I am debating between the 392 Jeep and a pickup- tough decision in that neither are cheap.
@jcfc81972 жыл бұрын
Nice looking Jeep, but I’ll stick to my 1990 Jeep Grand Wagoneer. Classic is where it’s at.
@williamserver43322 жыл бұрын
I'm not a truck/jeep guy but this one is cool. Just because of the engine
@bobalanadventures20242 жыл бұрын
Loved the video. Off-roading and Jeeps are the best!
@mickeywilson79982 жыл бұрын
.As always another great review RacerX
@samkloster34162 жыл бұрын
Have a 392 on order.....Would be nice to see the 5.7 Gladiator.
@jacobgreen13012 жыл бұрын
This is the first of your videos I’ve seen and no homo or anything but your eyes are just PIERCING!!
@SovereignKnight742 жыл бұрын
6.4 Jeep FTW!
@chadhanson43692 жыл бұрын
Got my order on a 392 it will be the most fun car ever made
@sid51562 жыл бұрын
I gotta agree racerx for the money I'd definitely take a trx over that Rubicon, but thats just me.
@marlow7692 жыл бұрын
Don’t forget that the Eco Diesel is a rocket ship too.
@toddhall3720 Жыл бұрын
Love the 392, can you ever justify the cost? Depends on what the budget and heart says.
@Mustang69GTR2 жыл бұрын
I want one!🔥🔥🔥🔥 that’s why I didn’t get a wrangler cuz they didn’t have a v8 version and ended up getting a 2008 Jeep srt8
@Verb1302 жыл бұрын
So many things you missed. For instance, when talking about the exhaust sound, you neglected the exhaust switch meant to change the flow and get better performance; and what you mentioned, the sound with an upgraded exhaust. The factory engineers already thought of that, and installed a switch for it. Your review is lacking.
@RacerX92 жыл бұрын
Are you kidding??.. because I didn't mention the active exhaust that essentially all the performance Mopars come with?.. thats not what I was focused on in the review. Give me a break with this
@ricksomething2 жыл бұрын
I like the new intro better than the old one.
@whatroads4x4 Жыл бұрын
Im driving a 2013 wrangler. 3.6ltr with 305,000 miles. Got my moneys worth. As for the 392...its cool and all. But i dont think there are alot of jeepers willing to "offroad" such an expensive vehicle. Maybe some overlanding...but nothing hardcore
@mblake04202 жыл бұрын
I want a gladiator with 392 but could never afford it
@reginamanzanares67269 ай бұрын
Would and did! I love mine! ❤
@roymorgan54982 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't buy one but I love the 393 in my skat pack killerBee. Nice video there Racer X.
@RacerX92 жыл бұрын
Thanks buddy 👍
@jimmycagle91422 жыл бұрын
Love these Jeeps! Out of my price range. 😩 But, I've been happy with the performance of my 2013 3.6 v6 Wrangler Sport 2 Dr. I kept mine stock BUT did give it the Magna-Flow duel exhaust and the K&N cold air. Made a world of difference in the driving experience. Plus...I give it gas...it goes!
@Fedup632 жыл бұрын
$90,000 is insane. Real jeep enthusiast will put the 392 in a jk or wrecked jl since all you need is the chassis and frame and interior everything else gets changed , motor transmission axles suspension
@1titans2 жыл бұрын
Many are getting this with the Xtreme Recon package
@oppie112 жыл бұрын
Racerx saying "as you guys know I'm kind of a gear head" is like Tom Brady saying "I'm a kind of good quarterback".
@RacerX92 жыл бұрын
Lol.. 😂
@TM-qn3qj2 жыл бұрын
Would be my dream vehicle if it was available in a Manual Transmission, and no the crappy flappy paddle shifters don't count. Driving a performance vehicle with an automatic is like driving with a condom on. That's fine if that's what your use to, but I drive with all the feel I can get, the way driving was intended!
@jimpaine7455 Жыл бұрын
Then by new 5.0/mustang. It will scare you. Traded my 2022 mach1 w/HP for my new Rubi.
@sheliacrowe51232 жыл бұрын
My type of vehicle period
@Rickbee2 жыл бұрын
I just want indigo blue or ocean blue back so I can order one now
@AStanton19662 жыл бұрын
They put a speed limiter on this Jeep and the TRX. You can't get them over 106mph.
@1titans2 жыл бұрын
Because of the tires. They aren’t rated to go over 110
@keonlinyear66782 жыл бұрын
I Like the 392 Wrangler but it’s way too expensive to not be able to get full use of it, I driven I base model jeep & couldn’t much use out of it where I live. If I stayed in Arizona I wouldn’t mind but i always thought they should have made 5.7 one first
@Mursedave2 жыл бұрын
I think what led me to not buying the 392 was that it has cylinder deactivation. I ended up picking a TRX instead.
@mini2nut672 жыл бұрын
They had to install it for CAFE reasons
@aurorayoru53332 жыл бұрын
It’s almost like FCA had plans to put v8s in their SUVs
@geneevans78852 жыл бұрын
The new jeeps are clean. The V6 they put out a few years ago is mean.
@hatchetwarrior12402 жыл бұрын
Should just put the 6.7 Cummins
@arlandoamb67542 жыл бұрын
I agree with everything that you said literally 👍🏿💯