Wow that is very scary, imagine a stuxnet via radio waves. Great explanation Nathan!
@donaldshannon37644 ай бұрын
So we went down this path with TEMPEST in the 1980's and this exploit requires the presence of malware on the targeted computer, the lack of a faraday cage around the equipment or facility, and the proximity of a receiver within what I would guess is about 100 feet or less. From a possible point of view it's best it could happen ... from a practical point of view it's much ado about nothing.
@NotTheSharpestKnife-mh4 ай бұрын
I would have thought that the metal computer case would stop the signal. Does it get out through vents and holes?
@StationxNet4 ай бұрын
A metal computer case does provide some shielding against electromagnetic emissions, but it is not designed to completely block the signals that can be exploited in attacks like RAMBO. The effectiveness of the case in stopping electromagnetic pulses depends on factors like the type of metal, thickness, and whether there are gaps or openings (such as for airflow, cables, etc.) that can allow signals to leak. While the case may reduce the strength of the signal, it typically isn’t enough to fully prevent side-channel attacks like RAMBO. To block these signals effectively, additional shielding measures such as a Faraday cage or specialized TEMPEST shielding would be needed. These are specifically designed to stop or significantly reduce electromagnetic emissions. So, while the case helps, it likely wouldn’t stop the signal entirely in a scenario like the RAMBO attack.
@turtlewax38494 ай бұрын
Faraday cages and Smith & Wessons should do well I think
@dankodnevic32224 ай бұрын
Nonsense... Once the attacker has code running on the machine, stealing data by EMI is the last problem... BTW, there are much more efficient ways to programmatically generate EMI. Mouse, keyboard and monitor cables are 1000x better antennas then balanced DDR lines inside computer enclosure...
@aisac214 ай бұрын
optimist prime 😂
@RyanErvin-iu6jy4 ай бұрын
You're talking like im stupid. Im not stupid of insearch this up. I dont appreciate how you were talking
@StationxNet4 ай бұрын
🤫
@ghost1010494 ай бұрын
@@StationxNet I like it. Quick and to the point is good. Maybe make a follow up vid that's more technical?