Reactions to New Details on Ship Components, Armor, & Death

Reactions to New Details on Ship Components, Armor, & Death | This Is The Right Direction!

Рет қаралды 7,955

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 48

@wolfkillshep Ай бұрын

I remember I used to get screamed at in the forms in the early days for suggesting that the game should be like Sea of Thieves in space with putting out fires and repairing components mid fight. They would say that the time to death will always be super quick and will never facilitate it. Now here we are. Super happy they were wrong because that is what the game needs to get my friends interested. They want to crew a ship from the inside while feeling like repairs and their presence means something. Not to just exist in a ship while it explodes around them to fulfill the fantasy of light fighters killing everything by themselves.

@LordBeef Ай бұрын

Sea of Thieves really is a good proof of how fun crew gameplay is

@jedi_drifter2988 Ай бұрын

IMO the Intrepid is a ship that will be in use as a runabout, when other starters are hangar decorations. It is built with future gameplay in mind ... Things will change in SC ... It's CIG's motto . It has full living accommodations & a engineering console to find critical component problems, which many solo ships do not have.

@briangueringer3673 Ай бұрын

The Carrack isn't "back", it's slightly more functional. The hopium is real 😂

@ArtemisSelene-jm6xs Ай бұрын

Aerospace engineer here: This is an amazing step forward for game development.

@b5fan504 Ай бұрын

"the current endgame ends with a 30K, Rich." effing lols.

@maxmoanz6561 Ай бұрын

Makes me excited. I have the 2948 exploration back and had a carrack to polaris ccu. I think I will keep the Carrack and use the extra store credit for some hauler or combat ship.

@ocic1474 Ай бұрын

the engineering term you're looking for my guy is modulus of elasticity or young's modulus (E) that's effectively material "stiffness" that plays into their modeling. Reynolds number is an aerodynamics/fluid dynamics thing :)

@jedi_drifter2988 Ай бұрын

It makes you wonder if CIG is working with Elon to make real starships and we are nothing but space monkeys testing the prototypes.

@llillian4055 Ай бұрын

Larger MISC ships ... Odyssey and Endeavor as a double (vey obvious commonality) even if it is only the 3 core variants they sold - the Hope, the Olympic, and the Discovery?

@jordan9632 Ай бұрын

Man. I'm nervous about "Death of a Spaceman".

@astromonkey2 Ай бұрын

It would be so much less scary if they just called it "Rep loss due to extensive plastic surgery"

@aguy446 Ай бұрын

I'll be all for it as long as we can become fully robotic like grievous with a heavy cost like needing to constantly repair yourself or something. Being a barely functional cyborg that has to constantly change out batteries or something would be really cool

@lordfraybin Ай бұрын

New gameplay Idea - Spend 10 minutes getting ready for a quick bounty. Fly 5 minutes to said bounty. Lose fight. Get stranded in space in dead ship. Spent 20 minutes waiting for rescue. Wait 10 minutes for reclaim or spent repairing the ship?? Thats the game loop they want new players to experience?

@Dr.Kryptanical Ай бұрын

The cargo pod doors open in it's 1st iteration of the new door functionality other YT streamers on Evocati said we can expect the next phase of the cargo pods themselves lowering to come to their tests and be in 4.0 before live, atm in it's current state a nursa can't fit in there cause just the door opening alone makes the gap too small height wise but rest assured it fit sideways so I can confirm that when the cargo pods fully lower themselves it will fit your Nursa in it... tanks and other large ground vehicles are still uncertain, dragonfly also struggles in this first stage due to it floating too high to get under into the door! from my understanding theres a small ramp shown that act's a door that opens the bottom part but it will really open up once the whole pod is lowered as there is no door on the rest of the pod it's just imbedded into the hull so it will slide out the hole meaning the entirety of the cargo pod sides will be fully exposed, what is still uncertain is whether the door ramp lowering will be seperate and individual on the control pad from the lowering of the pod itself!

@LMMSDeadDuck Ай бұрын

I think any sort of stress calculations they do are going to be simplistic, first-order equations. Their flight model is simple as evidenced by how the Intrepid rolls around the cockpit or how the Cutlass just flies in general. And that's fine - I'm not expecting high fidelity modeling across the board. Hopefully they can strike a balance of something that feels real, but won't come with a high computational price tag.

@rarrie9123 Ай бұрын

Has anyone noticed we are funding S42 as well and when it's released we will have to pay for it lol.

@korbentherhino Ай бұрын

not me. I have a copy.

@Leispada Ай бұрын

s42 is included for me

@matteobarbarini3120 Ай бұрын

Star citizen will be game of the century

@koolerpure Ай бұрын

i pictured the carracks blast shield differently when they said we would get it. also the cargo pods not lowering is just a sad thing to see. i bought my carrack with the idea one day i could drop the pods off at area's im working at and use them for what ever the game loop was. bet the pods become a module now so it becomes an additional thing to buy just to get something like medical research pods like they said we would be able to do when medical and exploration came online

@Karitas290674 Ай бұрын

They keep talking about re-registering ships through the criminal council. do you think that means there will be NO legal way to salvage a ship and make it yours, regardless of what has befallen it? totally legal players interested in salvaged will be compelled down the criminal path in order to get thier own tag on a salvaged ship?

@undeadpeak Ай бұрын

I’m sure there will probably be a legal way to do it through a legitimate salvage claim, would be nice is CIG chimed in about it.

@tomificated Ай бұрын

What they have said, is that salvage will involve dismantling and destroying. and recently they talked land confirmed about using the ship building mechanic to tear the hull apart for resources. Salvage is not repurposing* or repairing. They have said the hull is registered to someone. It will be illegal to claim it as your own without paying someone for it (if it’s not a irl pledge ship). Irl pledge ships will be illegal to repair and use for yourself. They seem fairly solid on this point. Making someone else’s ship yours will be illegal, unless you pay someone for that transfer. You won’t disable a ship and take it by force without the owners consent and then fly it without consequence.

@digdug4123 Ай бұрын

I'd imagine there will be some kind of system where the ship is claimed that the ship out in the universe is "abandoned" and free to salvage.

@TypicalDutchSaysHi Ай бұрын

Salvage a car parked on the street but no owner in sight, is also not legal. Each ship has an owner. It may be abandoned, but that should be an insurance case. A mission to salvage it on behalf of the owner or other party.

@exosin4394 Ай бұрын

Salvage is better than stealing. Getting its resources and saving the mods might as good as stealing it, because it requires more gameplay loops. I hope that they consider a drawback for the criminal licence. It should be void, if a crime is commited with this ship or if a bounty hunter with the corresponding repo mission is able to scan the ship. Insurance would pay 1% of its value to the bounty hunter that brings the ship back and have the thief be fined 100% of its value. The repo mission allows you to join the server, where the ship is located in currently. It should only be available to a few players per hour for each missing ship and cycle through players. A stolen ship further more should be bound to a specific shard, so that server region hopping cannot be abused.

@siriusscepter Ай бұрын

Your Dr Evil accent is on point 😂

@jungfaha Ай бұрын

maelstrom..., if it does not get implemented i want my ship made out of those light posts material!

@warren3174 Ай бұрын

finally , Carrack love

@haynkokanut Ай бұрын

Prolly not the best place to ask this...but, I bought one of the citcon bomber jackets, does anyone know when we'll get them? O7!! Thanks!

@Tentacl Ай бұрын

I like this whole thing is CONCEPT, but this makes me kinda feel the middle sizes will just not be viable for combat. Also, this, like many other concepts, make hybrid ships feel like they are just an after tough.

@Kallivak Ай бұрын

if legionaries aren't available in game soon we riot

@Kakeyoro Ай бұрын

Morning, Tomato.

@Zarviya Ай бұрын

It honestly sounds like they are ditching the world of tanks like HEALTH bar death for Warthunders pen/rip n tear off damage which is WAY more preferable

@cdkraft Ай бұрын

So now because they have "sold" the achievement of getting ships, they now have to devalue or complicate ship ownership so that those that "have" won't be at end game. My hope is that this endeavor doesn't end in tedium. I'm all for adding accomplishment or personalization complexities but who knows what these guys are cooking up.

@astromonkey2 Ай бұрын

Seventy-third!

@augustwest9727 Ай бұрын

😞 Should have named the skit: Citizen Joe Such a MISCed opportunity.

@Sholto_ Ай бұрын

Carrack still has those stupidly big intakes blocking the pilots view. Still lame.

@robopenguin5501 Ай бұрын

Lets be real dude do you really think the game will reach a polished enough state where we don't die from bugs? The game's underlying code is so spaghettified there will always be deaths to bugs.