Real Lawyer Reacts: Camille Vasquez Reaction to Depp v. Heard Netflix Show

[@katrinkarlsdottir]

I am digusted with the documentory's directors, producers and Netflix for claiming ownership of YT content creator's work as their own rather than paying the content creators for their work.

[@javanjunkindahouse6625]

Yes! It’s so wrong

[@alisonscurr4395]

Or asking their permission to use it.

[@gayjoebiden]

Why dont they just sue them? Oh they cant?

[@angelniki7318]

What they did to Popcorned planet was disgusting they used 12 of his clips without his permission

[@ESPHMacD]

EDB had no idea she was even in it until we told her.

[@janai5074]

I'm embarrassed to say, I went into this trial not know anything but what two or three headlines read over the years, and I just assumed Depp was guilty AF. Then I saw the testimony, evidence, and an even deeper look showed the disgusting and nefarious tactics Heard was using from the start. I was wrong and believe Depp did not hurt her the way she tried to tell everyone and their mother he did. It is because if this I hate being called a Depp bot or fanatic. I'm not a celebrity stan at all. I'm here for truth and justice and true crime.

[@One_nJen]

Same.. had no clue who AH was, was sad JD was laying hands, and then.. could.not.stop watching. Had to call my therapist a couple of times, too.

[@mitchkora]

Me too

[@SilkyShish]

I am curious why you believed he was an abuser especially, since he had not even been criminally charged? Is it because it was hard to believe a man could be a victim?

[@erica_em]

It's insulting, right?

[@N..P..]

​@SilkyShish His abuse wasn't particularly well known at first, it's likely because it's not particularly uncommon for people to avoid criminal charges with abuse. Even then, for a major celebrity, they can get away with it easily more often than not. Speaking for myself, I was aware he had troubles with alcohol and drugs so I just assumed it came with the territory. It was a learning experience for a lot of people. Most of us heard it and just said "ok" and moved on. It took the right people that knew more than the public did to signal boost what was going on before your average person would see the evidence that showed what she was doing.

[@Ania-cd2sh]

I won’t watch it….I watched the whole trial every single day…that’s all I needed to watch to know the truth.

[@JessicaSky]

exactly, majority of us watched the trial as it was on air , I will not be watching This Netflix Show especially since they stole scenes from KZbin Creators ...

[@chellbell7899]

There’s honestly nothing more than what was in the trial. Basically was a recap of what we say and what the KZbinrs were saying

[@Michellef1117]

Same.

[@insomiameditation6827]

who cares about what you believe omg - get a life

[@debbY100]

Same

[@merichase9627]

I watched the trial, I don't need to watch netflix. I am suprised Amber didn't get thrown in jail for perjury.

[@kathym.7088]

Indeed! #justice for amber should include jail time for her and her crooked lawyers! Rottenborn is very aptly named...😂

[@insomiameditation6827]

why ? Do you know them? Have you been there?? How can you even have an opinion?? REallly small minded

[@daniadejonghe4980]

I had no knowledge of the case before the trial... knew who he was as an actor, didn't follow him, knew nothing at all about her. I watched the pretty much the whole trial, from where Eve Barlow was thrown out on. It was a fascinating and illuminating process and I learned a great deal. And by the end it was really clear who was guilty and it wasn't Johnny Depp.

[@SilkyShish]

I remember when Amber filed the TRO, my gut told me something was off about that because Johnny has never had any prior history of domestic violence from any of his long-term partners. And because I am an abuse survivor and also work in domestic violence, I have had cases where the alleged "victim" turn out to be lying where they falsely claim to be of been abused. Yes, people (and women) DO LIE about being DV or rape victims. So, I was neutral on whether Johnny was an abuser because I don't believe everything I read especially mainstream media. I need to see and hear facts. And then I heard the audio tapes in 2020 where it is so clearly obvious she was the real abuser and he was the victim. I sometimes think it is a shame it took the trial to wake up more people into finally seeing the truth that he was in fact not the abuser, but the victim. But, at least now the majority of people have woken up to this fact. I remember telling people back in 2020 he was not an abuser after hearing the audio tapes. And people like me were in the small minority who felt Amber was the real abuser. Not anymore!

[@daniadejonghe4980]

@@SilkyShish good for you! My experience of her in the trial was of someone completely fixated on herself, posturing, posing and acting in order to hold all attention on herself. The complete narcissist.

[@SilkyShish]

@@daniadejonghe4980 Very observant of you to detect her narcissism from the jump of the trial.

[@daniadejonghe4980]

@@SilkyShish I grew up with one

[@SilkyShish]

@Trry331 You must have a listening problem because that is NOT what happened in the audio that was played in the trial. He was threatening to hurt himself because of all the abuse and lies he HD been subjected to by Amber the abuser. Do your research about the facts before leaving completely inaccurate comments.

[@LizzieCATs38]

The world believed Depp and we acted the way we did simply because of AH behavior's in the courtroom and definitely 100% the evidence. Like we all been saying she did this to herself

[@BlackStump172]

Depp is fortunate to be alive . If he had stayed , then I doubt that he would have survived.

[@Jkjoannaki]

If she hadn't testified and I saw bits of the trial I'd say I feel sorry for her for being in a very toxic relationship. Her histrionic behavior proved to me that she was the disordered abuser.

[@averysspookshowspectacular6205]

Her behavior and maybe also a hell of a lot of evidence?

[@daniadejonghe4980]

@@BlackStump172 I couldn’t agree more and I came to feel that way in the course of the trial. She had a great deal to gain from his death and the public narrative she was creating about him and his involvement with drugs and alcohol were a perfect means ready to hand.

[@nerd-mask723]

My issue is that you keep saying "we". But you mainly mean yourself. I don't doubt that YOU were convinced by AH looking like she acted, but I do believe there ARE people who only supported Johnny because he was Johnny. If it was a minority or not, we simply do not know. It wasn't so bad in the end, cause he most likely really is innocent, so the right person won. However the documentary suggests that he probably would've won anyways, just because the huge amount of support outside of the courtroom, even if he was in the wrong - as long as the trial was live-streamed. And to me that leaves a bitter taste on this case ...

[@BuffyLynn]

I could have been a juror as much as I knew before trial, but after watching I was like OMG she’s lying😮 It was AH testimony that did her in, NOT social media.

[@LeeHawkinsPhoto]

That’s 100% what did it for me. She’s the worst liar…everything she said was tall tales and you could tell in the moment that they were. She was only believable in extremely small cherry-picked doses…I didn’t even see Camille’s cross and her stories didn’t make sense.

[@Afrolovertje]

This! Like I had a minor bias for AH because of the allegations I had heard of in the past and the outcome of the UK trial, but after that testimony? It was clear who was lying. Never answering directly, always twisting words (pledge vs donated, really?). The extreme incidents of abuse but not a medical record in sight (broken nose, being assaulted with a broken bottle). Trying to say not a single paparazzi picture showed anything due to make-up, like what kind of magical foundation does she use??? And especially that depostion they showed snippets of, she just didn't come accross like a victim. Rolling her eyes, smiling. I watched the whole deposition afterwards and she was so rude and her lawyers were constantly interfering to help her testify, disgusting that she got away with her false claim for so long.

[@Rebecca-GLaines]

ABSOLUTELY!! I didn't know ANY of this either, but I did watch the while trial. I would have came to the same conclusion. She was the abuser. And I wouldn't have needed to go on social media to come to that verdict.

[@LizRealGirlBeauty]

With people like AH, the more they open their mouths the more credibility they lose.

[@LeeHawkinsPhoto]

@@Afrolovertje you sound like me. Anyone who watches her testimony…even on direct and not cross she is nonsensical. Had she told smaller lies she’d have fared much better…but she overdid it. She needs serious psychiatric help before she kills someone.

[@s.v.2796]

I started watching it. Made it about 10 min in before it dawned on me that the villain was going to be the public instead of AH. I stopped and remembered why I believed JD. I'm a survivor of an extremely abusive marriage (years ago). AH's own words carried the promise of violence, the reality of life with an abuser- one so slick that everyone thought I was insane. Even tho I'm the one who at 70 still carries the physical damage. I'm guessing the jury realized the same behaviors.

[@LilsassyJ]

The villain was AH not the public. While there was and is a lot of people who jump sides and make fun of people, AH is the abuser and villain.

[@fibanocci314]

I'm glad you got out and moved on!

[@s.v.2796]

@@LilsassyJ I agree. I ended up going back and watching the entire thing. Netflix doc did their level best to present the public as being an overriding reason for AH's loss. Many important moments of testimony were left out. Instead there was filler showing a number of actors glued to their phones. I would be curious to know how many AH supporters were part of the documentary process.

[@LizRealGirlBeauty]

Listening to her screaming and gaslighting him in their recordings did it for me. You hear what you went through in those, and you know it's her abusing him.

[@S0ma_58]

What are you talking about? Amber heard literally said “I DID START A PHYSICAL FIGHT”

[@jknott123]

We listened to other Lawyers breaking it down to us. “Real” Lawyers, like yourself or Runkle, Emily D. Baker, or Rob from Law and Lumber, who were unbiased until the evidence came steam rolling through. You all gave us clarity!

[@jknott123]

@@TomGibbons-ll2wy none actually…unless we count Television! 😉

[@horse-lover68]

​@@TomGibbons-ll2wyIt is lawtube - why don't YOU know it??

[@PhoenIXPhantasies]

@@horse-lover68 I think you need a lesson in reading.

[@horse-lover68]

@@PhoenIXPhantasies You need a lesson in THINKING and behaving. Oh you feel joy when somebody makes a mistake so you can feel important one time in your life?? Disgusting!! Leave me alone or I will block and report you. I do not kick at people who are in the ground but you seam to like it??🖕

[@Hanloss]

​@@TomGibbons-ll2wyto be fair the dui guy was being weird

[@craigstueber392]

Camille is incredibly professional and well spoken!!!! She is spot on! I thought that Amber would win but then I actually watched the case and totally flipped my opinion. (It was nice not to be influenced by media and to be able to make up my own mind). I like many, was pretty frustrated with Amber based on the evidence that was presented . She definitely came across as someone that was lying. I truly dont think social media impacted the outcome of the case at all. I do think that being able to see the case helped people see what was actually going on rather than relying on media to inform us. Anyone watching the case was able to make their own judgements and the majority I am sure found Johnny Depp as the winner in this case. (Lets be honest Amber testifying was the nail in the coffin 😬). I doubt I will watch the Netflix series based on what I am seeing about it.

[@barbyrice3130]

I agree. I watched the trial, made up my own mind. The facts and proof in this case made up my mind. I listened to AH and she was evasive and had excuse after excuse for everything. Who takes pictures of everything except her bruises. IMO Amber didn’t come across as believable. My reaction to AH was to her evidence and the total unbelievable testimony. She isn’t a very nice human being, she needs to work on that.

[@user-vd8jj9ny8u]

My sentiments exactly. Glad I was able to form my opinion by watching the trial with my own eyes and especially after what the media was so trying to portray to the people who didn't watch the trial.

[@nmiller4085]

People who say it was influenced by social media don’t give the jury enough credit. Jurors tend to be very conscientious, much more so than people realize

[@tonyvelasquez6776]

can you help me understand what is the thing going on with her teeth? It looks like her top teeth are kind of pushed out more? Is it becausethey're fake? They look 'big'@@barbyrice3130

[@mary-janereallynotsarah684]

Camille is the star of this trial. 🥰 she's so sweet and graceful. She could be a movie star with her looks. And obviously a badass in court.

[@pickyourswitchoriginal]

I am grateful for the KZbin coverage of the actual trial. That's what I was glued to...not other social media. Except to say "did you watch the trial"? Because I did. The entire thing. And I appreciate LawTube for the legal explanations. It's also probably why your channel popped up in my feed 😊 So many people not only became interested in the judicial process, but collectively learned a LOT about the law and how court proceedings work. I doubt the Netflix documentary looked at that bit. But I can't say for sure, because I won't be watching it. I think it will just either annoy or anger me. Because I watched the trial.

[@fourofcats5803]

For what it’s worth- when I heard that Johnny Depp had been accused of abusing his partner (I didn’t know who Heard was at the time), I was upset *because I immediately believed the report*. I’ve always loved Johnny as an actor and I was invested enough to be disappointed, but I totally believed he had done something wrong because a female had accused a male of abuse. I’m not proud of this. So, I definitely didn’t go into this case having sided with Johnny, though now I feel shame about having reached any conclusions beforehand. If anything, this case taught me that the next time a public figure is accused of something, I will be doing my conscience best to remain neutral until as much as possible is known. So I think the idea that everyone was against Heard because how dare she mess with Johnny is just not true. I was convinced by the trial that Heard was lying and was abusive herself.

[@kirstena4001]

100%

[@nohemicruz7897]

When I first heard of the accusations was when she was out the courthouse with the big bruise on her cheek. I was shocked. Literally, the next day, I knew he was innocent. That was the day when she and Rocky were pictured walking out of her lawyers office. Amber was seen very clearly, without makeup, and her right cheek without a bruise in sight. Like magic *POOF*. As soon as I saw that the bruise was not there; it was clear she made it up.

[@oldstuffbethtx8052]

The Netflix series is disappointing. I watched the trial. They didn’t explain the defamation accusation against Depp’s attorney as the reason for the $2 million that Amber won.

[@bookworm598]

They also didn't talk about the punitive damages which clearly showed that the jury thought Amber deserved to be punished and that Johnny didn't

[@izabelasiczek3547]

You would think it be vital to add that

[@margaretroserobertson4545]

It pisses me of that's she was awarded $2,000,000 because all of it was Johnny Depp Not responsible but he said was hoax

[@Marshab247]

I won’t watch it. It will make me angry how the trial was portrayed.

[@jeffrecrowley]

Yeah, I don't want to get riled up. I really don't blame Netflix though. It's there job to make money.

[@triciamuir]

Ditto.

[@angelaustralia1302]

Yep don’t think my TV would make it through! 🤬🤬

[@PhoebeMc]

I'm already angry Ian Runkle is fine with them use his footage! HA! wait till they copyright strike him like they did Andy!! I wouldn't watch it with a gun to my head! I've canceled Netflix & won't be going back!!

[@Teresa_Kaye]

Peter was flashed on the screen for a moment too

[@MBeano]

As a shoutout to this channel, and others, the LAW and Behavioral aspects of this case were far more fascinating than the dull docuseries. Learning about the law, how things actually work, and from a legal perspective what is working or not working, the why behind things, and all of the intricacies of the legal and court system is far more entertaining than the empty nothing burger of the docuseries. Even just the court live streams by themselves were more intriguing. Thank You for all your work on these cases.

[@esmc58]

Camille is such an excellent communicator

[@DocTJB]

It seemed like a hit piece on some lawtubers, especially EDB and Popcorned Planet….characterizing them as grifters. AND they have now claimed copyright on Andy’s personal recorded footage of his meeting with JD. It felt very biased in favor of AH to me.

[@angelaustralia1302]

Extremely hypocritical! Netflix & MSM make billions on news (cough, cough, whatever narrative they decide) yet KZbinrs are not allowed to make $ from their content! Make it make sense. Thank god there were cameras & we didn’t have to rely on MSM - can you imagine? It’s horrifying & makes me wonder what else have they lied about. At present it seems everything!

[@HeyDollface333]

i felt that way too when i watched it

[@LexaTerrestrialx]

But weren’t the armchair KZbin law exports biased themselves?? Even more so than the documentary was about them. The documentary just showed clips of them talking… It put a mirror to the entire thing…

[@angelaustralia1302]

@@LexaTerrestrialx I respectfully disagree! Watched with & without commentary didn’t matter! Jury got it right & all KZbinrs are allowed to make an income. For some, trial streaming is what they do!!

[@rufusroher]

@@LexaTerrestrialx NetFlix literally took the KZbinrs own production and content and used in this documentary. What KZbinrs produce on KZbin is copyrighted by them. It's their material. NetFlix did not get any license or authorization from the KZbinrs to use it in this 'documentary'. They didn't commentated over those clips, unlike how the KZbinrs did of the trial--thus, did NOTHING to affect 'fair use' of their material. They simply lifted their videos and used them.... and NOW NetFlix is claiming THEY have a copyright over the KZbinrs' video productions and contents, MERELY because they put them into THEIR documentary. It's shady af and a lowlife move... Which speaks to the quality of the BIASE that NETFLIX has over this story. I hope to hell the KZbinr's that were affected sue NetFlix over this....

[@itsx0aliciadaatea]

It's not even a docuseries, all they did was steal content from ppl who covered the trial and mash it together! Emily, Popcorn Planet, Tug! It's ridiculous! I hope everyone sues!

[@A_girl_named_Joey]

​I went into this thinking this case was like A Star is Born, older star, drinks drugs beats on younger wife on her way up. Once I heard the evidence, totally went the other way. Johnny was the victim, Amber acted like an abuser. From what I've been hearing, the documentary is skewed in the other direction, against the evidence, I won't watch it. I also couldn't believe how they copyright struck Andy Signore for the video he took on his own phone.

[@PhoebeMc]

Every single publication that has been created in the last seven years has been skewed towards her! There's been nothing but hit pcs against JD!! Like I've said, I'll not only not watch it, I've canceled Netflix & won't be returning after this shiz! They've no right to take people's footage, use it they way they want, & then copyright strike the creator of they try to watch it!!! That's what they're doing to Andy! Dunno about others...

[@dalerimoller272]

@A_girl_named_Joey I agree with every point you’ve made. I went into it thinking AH was the victim because I had only seen the cabinet video of JD. I never paid attention to celebs, but I wasn’t working during that time for some health reasons so I watched the trial live, every day. It quickly became apparent that AH’s stories were not holding up. I’m a survivor of assault and rape and my attacker got a fifty year sentence for it. So I support other survivors and I was absolutely disgusted by Amber; infuriated, really. I watched the law nerds, Emily D. Baker, Andy Signore, and that umbrella guy- before his name was announced in the trial. Finding out what Netflix did with Andy’s cell video, copyright striking him was just asinine! So I won’t be watching it either. But I already deleted my account for some other shady things I didn’t like about that company before, so I can’t watch it even if I wanted to.

[@BubblyOne]

​@dalerimoller272 agreed completely! I thought wow I had no idea he was an abuser and was upset and feeling horrible for her.. along comes the trial and we hear the truth! SHE is a ruthless kiniving monster out to ruin the people she's used up! I too was victimized but my perpetrator was family and my mother kept silent about all of his abuse in trade for child support. 💔

[@seaofghosts]

All it does is juxtapose the testimonies from both parties rather than spaced out as happens with a trial. You can't comment on what you haven't seen.

[@AcmeRocket]

It was a drug fueled destructive, abusive, dysfunctional relationship from both sides. They were both victims. It isn't a sporting event. No winners. Neither of them is/was capable of anything else. One side had better actors and lawyers.

[@FireflyBakerySweets]

I also think Netflix should have shown there were many pictures in evidence that showed they had been edited and that they couldnt get any original pictures from AH

[@christygray5353]

Popcorn planet is looking to take legal action. I hope they do as they shouldn’t be allowed to use their content without permission. Really want to know EDB reaction as she was also prominently used also.

[@angelaustralia1302]

Unfortunately they won’t get anywhere. Netflix have billions! PP would be held up in litigation for years & the cost would be millions! Not going to happen!

[@420-pom]

Andy and Steph need to take action also against channel 4 as they are the one who stole the content, but for Netflix to claim they own the copy right to Andy’s own footage and trying to stop him using it and spin it all against him is sick and yeah I would be interested to hear what EDB thinks as well…. As for the jury I would be pissed and looking at action too.🤬🤬🤬🤬😢🍆🐷

[@angelaustralia1302]

You may find that EDB was paid? I don’t know for sure of course! But DUI Guy & Darthnews were paid. Other creators were approached, they said no, but Netflix doesn’t give a shot & used it anyway! Hence why I don’t believe any action taken by the creators will go anywhere! Netflix know they can get away with it!

[@PhoebeMc]

I'm sad to agree & I also think Camille REALLY wants a job in MSM, so she sold this like it was well done! I DISAGREE! I think it was a total hit pc! They skewed Andy's footage as if JD paid for them to be there, used the whole thing as good press, & we know that wasn't the case! I think Camille said what she felt she had to say... just like Nick Walls' book was well written. Sure! Ok... and I've got some swamp land I'll sell whoever thought that! I dunno if they used any of your footage, Peter, but if you play it, don't plan to monetize that vid!! JD is VERY GOOD to hold his cards close to his vest! He could've given interviews, but he NEVER HAS!!! Notice, hitting and punching are used synonymous, as well!! And no, that's NOT how mortgages are paid! I WISH!! I don't think I could pledge a mortgage!

[@lindseystein9676]

It falls under fair use.

[@erica_em]

It was a hit piece on us, primarily, portraying people like you and EDB as Tik Tokkers and people like me as rabid, uninformed Johnny fans. We were represented by masked mens rights weirdos, gamer bros, and others who would be taken the least seriously. It was insulting. I watched every minute of the case three times over. I downloaded the evidence. I've read the sidebars. And then I moved on to the next trial which I think was Nikolas Cruz's penalty phase. Then, Danielle Redlick, Mattheau Moore, Darrell Brooks, Trevor Summers, Dean Cummings and so on to this day. I'm certain that I know the facts in evidence in Depp v Heard better than any of the folks who reduced me to a bot and memester who was in it purely for the lols. I'm confident most of us do.

[@aawe1]

You read the sidebars? How did you read the sidebars?

[@floof_croissant]

Exactly! Especially when they started to portray EDB and lawtube overall as biased, I couldn’t watch anymore. If anything, lawtube was THE MOST neutral when coming into the trial

[@serenity7725]

Yep like little 🐑 following the herd.. that's what y'all are. Netflix got it right 👍

[@annemoore3590]

​@@aawe1The sidebar transcripts were released very recently.

[@aawe1]

@@annemoore3590 Okay

[@BillyP1983]

The biggest problem I have with this is how Netflix has taken ownership of the clips of KZbinrs the producers used for a lot of this that doesn’t belong to them. It’s really terrible that KZbin has started striking content creators who’s video clips were used from monetizing their own content. Ex… Popcorned Planet and I’m sure EDB…

[@elizabethaja]

I watched all 3 eps, specifically so I could see and understand how the KZbinrs content was used. Very curious to see how the next weeks will play out, as in, will more of the featured content creators legally or otherwise object to this use of their IP without permission? All creators who’ve spoken so far have said they did not permit this use. The non-lawyers among those featured seem publicly livid, the lawyers featured are still… (expectedly) silent. I’m waiting for the filings. 🍿

[@cats.addict6457]

Maybe it will shock some people but being French and him with his ex-epouse living there, we had a lot of feedbacks, stories about them. Vanessa Paradis is known for being outspoken and honest, and once she gave her feedback when joining him just after it all happened, I was sure he never did all Mrs Heard allegedly said happened. Therefore, like I refused to see Megan & Harry's serie, I will not watch this one... Thanks Peter for taking time of doing this video 🙏🙏🙏

[@alec1984]

It's surprising how many people have raised this, but in one of the photos AH took of JD showed a 'stage' bruise kit (as in makup kit that's used by stage actors to show a bruise) on the table. It's the photo where JD is asleep on the couch with his hand in his pocket holding a melted ice scream AH gave him to hold. Additionally, didn't she slip up in the trial and call it a bruise kit rather than a makeup kit to cover her bruises? Yeah she didn't recover from that well.

[@PhoebeMc]

She sure did! And when she walked thru the application of the "bruise kit," she inadvertently described building a bruise for the different days of colorizing to get the right effect. Anyone that's ever attempted to cover a mark, scar, bruise, hickey in hs (lol!!) knows you wouldn't apply this last. It's not a concealer & even if it were, that doesn't go on last, either. The pic of her at the LA courthouse getting the TRO, before I knew much, I thought looked "applied." A bruise with any makeup over it isn't going to be brilliantly colored like this thing she had in her face! She wanted it to stand out, but I bet up close, it was fairly obvious to someone who knows how to apply makeup. Also, those of you who know KNOW you don't just have a bruise perfectly round & no discoloration from impact anywhere else. She literally had a big round blueberry (although much lgr) in her ck! My take, anyway.

[@alec1984]

@@PhoebeMc Yeah, that bruise outside the courtroom looked like someone had lighly applied charcoal on their face. Absolute giveaway, considering JD was out of the country for like 5 days. LOL I love to hear the reaction from the jurors when they saw that. I mean, did AH they they're that stupid, they don't know what a bruise looks like? I wonder what AH's legal team were thinking with this kind of evidence? Possibly FML? 😂😂😂😂

[@PhoebeMc]

@alec1984 I wondered how many other women, especially, caught that. I've delved into makeup artistry much of my life, but I didn't know if listeners in general would catch that or not. Good to know it was as obvious to you as it was to me. I saw that & threw up my hands & just thought, Cone on, people!! Elaine said she ALWAYS wore makeup & then AH swears understand she was obviously not wearing any makeup, so who's telling the truth? The whole crap about Rocky stopping her and telling her not to put any makeup on, too, was just a little too much detail for my liking. That made it stand out even more as hogwash! Hell, TMZ should have been able to see it was totally fake!!! And maybe they did, and maybe there was no reason to say that, or if they did, it would sound like they fell for AHs bs, but we know they DID fall for AHs crap! Doesn't mean we're going to!!

[@phoenixrising71715]

Brilliant job by Camille Vasquez! This interview is a prime example of what makes her a true Advocate! Johnny didn't try to portray himself as PERFECT, he admitted to his actual flaws ...BUT, after the trial, its clear to me that Amber is deceitful and the true abuser!!!

[@dirtywater04]

Netflix has taken copyright from content creators without permission.

[@boriquajewel_JM]

I’m glad I watched it first hand- especially with the LYK fam.

[@howardmckenna]

Camille was a class act in court, afterwards in the post trial circus, and continues to stay classy. No mud slinging, straight up facts. She's bloody good!

[@MBeano]

This doc series tried REALLY hard to appear unbiased. However, the bias was extremely obvious. It didn't sensationalize to the level of some Shouting heads shows (many of the worst aren't even political, they are sports). However, the spin was quite clear. All the "questioning" are in exact alignment with the Heard team's talking points. ALL of them. It also used the tired trope of the "the media" as the enemy, while being completely oblivious to the hypocrisy of such an angle - Really? you dont see your docudrama as "the media", get a clue. The only qualifier in the propaganda piece is they are a bit more specific, calling out social media, even though much of the footage was standard media. It also only painted a negative spin when the social media was in favor of Depp, but made little mention of the how the media (standard and social) had vilified him prior to the trial. It wasn't until Heard opened her mouth that the tide really shifted.

[@shawniepicanco2096]

Thank you from Maui… we are hours behind, but I appreciate the updates!

[@PurpleIris034]

I watched the new docu. I think there were times when Netflix could have clarified some footage. They showed a few of the YT lawyers including Peter. Popcorn Planet was highlighted quite a bit. If you saw the trial u could spot the inconsistencies.

[@tasst2674]

I remember you thinking she would win, and sadly, I agreed with you. So glad we were able to hear and more importantly see the testimony which made all the difference.

[@UrsulaPowers]

I appreciated your reasonable thoughts about this documentary.

[@courtneycartwright4975]

Peter! because of your coverage of the netflix special, i decided to watch it. YOU made it as a youtuber on that special!!! how awesome!

[@jankruschen8289]

So excited to watch this one … live! Looking forward to this subject. Still interested in DEPP. Have a great night, Peter.

[@usakiwi1986]

Seeing Amber trying to "secretly" record Johnny is what really got me.

[@theashholee]

Justice for popcorn planet! ❤

[@Candy_K4ay]

Lol, Peter the UK trial WASN'T a response to Amber Heard and her allegations. It was a response to Dan Wotton (who by the way is getting his own karma and begging not to be cancelled). Depp in the UK trial DIDN'T also get a chance to tell his own side of the story.

[@gloriahoulne]

Pledge is a promise only, donate is an action verb.

[@azamnoorazah]

Rewatch crew. 💻🎧 Thanks for reviewing Peter!🙏🏼 Yeah, I’m one of them who sent the link you but I also watch it for the first time with you and the LYK Fam here! ✨

[@margaretyoung5412]

Thanks Peter. This case will never be over for me especially when Camille and Ben speak or sidebar discussions.

[@r1133rocco]

I want it watch the documentary but I won’t because of the issue with Netflix stealing from Andy Signore’s

[@lilychats5317]

Same. I'm going to unsubscribe from Netflix to show solidarity.

[@esmc58]

I probably won’t what it because I saw the real thing but I’m glad you are covering it.

[@barrywarner7883]

Hi watching you and all the lawyer's on utube on this trial got me intrested in the trial prosess. I now hooked.

[@SpicyLadyBug]

Some of the creators are upset about some of their footage that was taken and used without their permission and claiming the material as theirs..AND implying that social media is the only reason JD won.. I have not seen it yet so other than explaining what the real deal is for the creators I don't have an opinion yet.. I love your channel you keep it simple so we get a true understanding of what is happening.

[@mclbanton]

😂“Donated not Pledged”

[@backonmybs7790]

"they're synonymous to me"

[@peggyriordan9857]

I wish the interview had been focused on the series instead of a rehash of the trial. Just a thought: How about you reaching out to her for an interview? Then we would hear her thoughts on the actual series. The worst thing that could happen is that she might say no. She could also say yes. It's a 50/50 shot and you've lost nothing if she does say no. She referred to the producer (?) as Emma, so I am wondering if Ms. Vasquez knew how the series was put together or was she able to screen it first? Thanks for doing this one for us!

[@mr_rn6549]

The Depp Trial really turned me on to watching televised or recorded trials from that trial forward. I also understand case law and the workings of trial a lot better and definitely would be a better juror ( large point of underpinnings is largely from KZbinrs such as yourself, Harvard Lawyer Lee and some Lawtube folks.

[@Anna-ou9dh]

Camille agreed on coverage about what was happening WITHIN the courtroom.

[@erica_em]

She did say that and emphasized it very specifically. However, she is still being generous. I'll say this - they didn't seem to be knowingly misrepresenting the bits of the trial itself they covered in three episodes, unlike the way they made me and you and Peter and EDB look like cruel, opportunist fools, Depp fanatics, and tabloid fiends with no actual interest in the details when they know that not to be true. I mean, they included and heavily a featured a masked mens' rights advocate whose channel only had 26k subscribers AFTER the trial and who I'd literally never seen in all my Depp coverage consumption. They had to really dig to find that guy and then turned around and portrayed him alongside EDB and others who were "suddenly" covering the law. 🤣

[@jdlotus8253]

But the documentary makers and Netflix using Andy Signore's footage without permission, licence or compensation and then claiming copyright over that footage, copyright striking Andy for his own footage is outrageous and unacceptable.d

[@karenvasquezwoolcock]

Hi Peter and LYK Family 🖐️.

[@theashholee]

Camille is such a good speaker

[@the_voice_of_reason]

I loved it. Depp’s team was BRILLIANT. Johnny Depp conducted himself in an exemplary manner. His humour in all that tragedy was so Johnny. He was and is totally loved. Being in Australia, I had to watch through the night and I did. I was extremely sleep deprived and I could never even imagine the exhaustion the team and Johnny suffered. He was loved before the trial, he is loved 100 times more after the trial. The opening statement by Ambers lawyer was so flawed.. it started with being introduced by her Lawyer as Laura Amber Heard.. my first thought? Oh 💩! Not good.

[@marydiaz2763]

She was a great lawyer. Didn't watch all of it but was very impressed with her.

[@annettevargas3632]

Camille was great. Smart and prepared

[@devilsadvocate1597]

the UK "stuff" didn'r hold AH accountable, the Judge made unreasonable assumptions and held the Newspaper was not accountable... it has nothing to do with AH testomony or her innocence The US trial was about AH vs JD, that showed AH in her true light!

[@beverly.alford]

Thanks, Counselor. Great video, per your norm ⛳️⛳️⛳️

[@lovele1979]

Thank you for going through this interview. It really puts into context the positive review of the doc you series that Netflix dead. It is because they showed her clips and she reacted to those clips so if they only show her positive things that were said about Joni in that interview and didn’t show her some things that were not true. Then she couldn’t have reacted to it and that’s why she said it’s good. And I agree what she says the biggest thing to take away from everything is peoples reactions. part in regards to the evidence and fax that we heard during the trial more than anything.

[@Hockeymama39]

I watched the Netflix series. It was basically all KZbin clips and clips of the trial put together. Nothing of their own creation.

[@beccaharrison8977]

Having been married to a male version of AH I can safely say that... on top of the DV people like her shred you in a ways both mentally & emotionally that is unfathomable even as it's happening so I don't doubt for a second that JD reacted in less than flattering ways to her shenanigans on more than one occasion...at some point they will bring out a side of you that you never imagined...let alone knew...existed...& when provoked you start reacting in ways that even you don't understand out of self preservation

[@serenity7725]

So close yet so far away.. mutual abuse doesn't exist.. he got what he deserved marrying a young woman half his age..

[@beccaharrison8977]

@@serenity7725 for clarity...while I disagree that it doesn't exist...at no point in my comment did I say anything about mutual abuse...& NO ONE deserves to be physically abused...let alone put thru the kind of mental/emotional abuse that a narcissist puts their spouses/kids thru...for any reason

[@serenity7725]

@@beccaharrison8977 reactive abuse.. that's what u think happened to JD.. but it's not.. she reacted to his abuse.. and that's why people like u don't think she was a perfect victim.. cuz u think victims don't hit back.. well they do and then they get called narcissistic by other victims.. which is ironic

[@beccaharrison8977]

@@serenity7725 let me be clear about people like me...meaning someone who actually IS a surviver of narcissistic abuse...I have nothing but empathy for anyone who's had the misfortune of being involved with a narcissist because I know from first hand experience what it's like when...after treating you as if you're sub-human...they twist shit to make you look like the crazy person...& I never once said a victim won't fight back because I fought back with everything in me defending myself... my reasons for not believing she's a victim are based on things like...the recordings of her admitting to being the one who started the physical fights...there being absolutely no sign of bruising or swelling in the tv interview she did or any photos taken of her in the days after she claimed her nose was broken & her lip was busted from him punching her in the face...& before you start with...it was all covered up with make-up/concealer... BULLSHIT!!!...while you might be able to cover up a bruise...no amount of concealer is going to hide the swelling from a broken nose & no lipstick is going to hide a split lip...

[@serenity7725]

@@beccaharrison8977 right.. what's the definition of abuse?.. psychical, emotional,mental, etc.. so ur telling me that she wasn't in an abusive relationship.. go ahead.. tell me she wasn't.. and if u do say she wasn't.. all ur credibility is gone.. u will have lost the argument.. nobody is a perfect victim.. but what I do know was she was in an abusive relationship with JD.. therefore she should have won this case.. but people like u are so blinded by his ugly face and fake charm.. that u forgot to take ur emotions out this case and u forgot to think logically.. with facts..

[@HollyAZ]

I don't think I'll watch the Netflix series. Living through the actual trial was enough for me.

[@carlacastillo3110]

Another great vídeo peter, camille is an amazing lawyer, she did a great job, in jd's case.

[@BevHart]

Biggest case of the century until NF is sued for using unauthorised material from KZbin platforms without permission and claiming copyright on the material.

[@elisaseverns2543]

Donate and pledge definitely have different meanings. I felt Camille’s response should have been stronger and more definite.

[@Snoozysusie]

Camille proved her point when they had hospital and ACLU reps testify about how much they had received by the time of trial

[@vanessac1721]

My question would be "did the money ever actually land in their bank accounts after the so called pledge" once she refused to answer the donate question.

[@kimincannes]

I get what Johnny means when he says this is the first time he's been able to "tell his side of the story"..... in the UK, his "ex" was merely a WITNESS. This time was FAR different in that respect. She had to answer for all of her allegations. Camille is a legal LEGEND if for no other reason than how she handled "the ex".

[@67jujub]

Dang it I missed the live. I'm part of the rewatch crew. I haven't watched it & I don't think I will. I am enjoying your take on it though. Have a great evening, see you & the rest of the LYK fame tomorrow.😊

[@jogottman22]

I'm not interested in watching the documentary. I watched the trial and that's good enough for me. Some people were upset with Camille including popcorn planet. She still my favorite lawyer and Ben Chew and the rest of them. I felt they were carry themselves well. And like she said they believed their client and fought for him.

[@bessieknox]

Notice Andy didn't call her out on what used to be known as Twitter and I'm talking about Camille Vasquez he didn't go up on EX and be like at Camille why did you do that to us that interview when they used our footage without our permission and without paying for it you won't see him do that but I seriously hope Camille responds to his dumbass video and wanting people to donate money for him to sue Netflix he's your biggest grifter out there! I don't care what anybody says I've given him a third chance and it didn't work out. He's nothing but a cheating Pig gave him the second chance after he cheated only to be called out in a live chat over some damn Taylor Swift tickets that I was actually going to give him legitimately said during the chat that I could not charge somebody more than what I paid for them somebody had to tell him that in a Super Chat because he had already said some nasty s*** about what I was going to charge him and that's when he saw the Super Chat and started to try to apologize and that was enough for me that showed his true colors to me and I have that recording still I have the receipts of what happened that night during his life chat that shows his true colors! I just think it's funny that two-and-a-half 3 weeks ago he was back in Netflix for what they have done to Meghan and Harry and dropping them yet turns around now wanting to sue Netflix for what they had done why don't you think it's funny fat Andy?! I sure as hell did. What's good for the goose is good for the gander!😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@77SunnyDazeInDecember]

🙏 Thankyou, Peter!

[@LawyerYouKnow]

thanks for your support!

[@77SunnyDazeInDecember]

@@LawyerYouKnow absolutely you're the most unbiased, honest, qualified, no non-sense, genuine, kind, well mannered, easy on the eyes, creator out there. And your dad, Big George is just an absolute stud with his knowledge, charisma, and always calm unwavering confidence. I just cant get enough of watching the two of you together weighing in on these cases, antics, and semantics! Its both my honor and pleasure! 🙏 🏌️⛳

[@WillBeUnknownToYou]

I canceled Netflix a long time ago and I don’t regret it

[@principesa1265]

Thank you Peter. You’re awesome.

[@fiddlestix6468]

I watched the entire trial, which started with me not knowing what is what. Was not very long into it that I realised there were many holes in the AH side. The thing that clinched the deal for me was the tapes of all their conversations from Regular Guy. Interesting that Dan Wootton who called Johnny a 'wife beater' and which started the UK trial has subsequently been exposed in a sex scandal.

[@dmcrammer167]

This Depp v Heard case was all about words - the statements from the case, the PR words, the social media coverage. Words matter more now than ever before.

[@ruthanna4713]

Is it true that some of LawTube were paid to have their clips in the documentary? The way NetFlix has stolen Popcorned Planets footage with Johnny is criminal.

[@illusionisms]

I started to watch it but had something come up and I have not gotten back to it. I guess I will atempt to watch the rest. 🧐😉❤️

[@Bees123Knees]

I haven't watched it yet, but I will. I watched every day of the trial, so there's no way Netflix or anyone else can spin it any other way.

[@carolmartin3028]

How could you not hate her.

[@sithpanda]

Thank you, Peter. I have heard that some, perhaps most, of the social media videos used in the Netflix documentary were used without permission or compensation. As this documentary was publicized, I believe in the UK, and then purchased by Netflix, selling content 'without permission' is that somehow considered fair use or do those whose content was used without permission or compensation perhaps have some legal standing of some sort against Netflix and/or the original creator of the documentary? One of the sources of content that was not compensated or asked was Andy Signore from Popcorn Planet. I mention him as I see he has a couple of uploaded videos directly speaking of this and something that you can easily verify on your own, if you wished to do so. I find it particularly interesting that content creators content was pulled and used for a broadcast media production, especially given the drama and backlash that several outlets expressed about social media creating content for financial gains, and then to have that 'stolen' and sold to the public, repackaged is baffling to me and something I am immensely curious about. Thank you for considering my question/comment.

[@BMack-p9s]

Guess if the content creator puts it out into the public domain then it becomes fair use, given it's accessible to all and this is intended. The creators have already made their money too right. If Andy was smart he'd be thanking Netflix for the plug.

[@sithpanda]

@@BMack-p9s While I am unsure of the laws that cover this type of use, I would imagine that selling someone else's content without consent or compensation is likely not OK. If you make a product and someone else copies it and sells it, why would you thank them for using your time and effort to make profit for themselves? I do see that there was another video about the series before this one that I missed. I am going to watch that. Perhaps my question has already been addressed.

[@EpicTutorialTips]

@@sithpanda - Because it's a 'docuseries' (documentary), that has an element of fair use in the mix because it's based on real historic events. They may have reached out as a courtesy to inform them, and made a discretionary payment or even arranged a licence, but because of the type of production that it is, they are allowed to use material in its original form in the documentary. They should however be mentioned in the credits (I haven't actually watched the documentary, I only watched the live trial). So perhaps others know whether there is mention in the credits or not.

[@EpicTutorialTips]

@MichelleMoe86 - That's not. It's probably easily fixable by disputing it though, and sending a Cease and Desist to Netflix (if he's based in the US), and a Letter of Intent to C4 in the UK. Chances are it is just Content ID flagging it, but they are the copyright holder to their own material so absolutely can contest any claim or strike, just need to follow the correct procedure to do so though.

[@sithpanda]

@@EpicTutorialTips While a docuseries is able to report real life events, I question the legality of them doing so using footage that is recorded and copyright owned by another individual. Had the docuseries creators used actors and reenacted events, that would be OK. Even broadcast media is unable to use someone's content without consent. If I record a tornado from my home and post it, ABC cannot just yank it and use it for the news unless they contact me first and I tell them OK, unless I post it along with some sort of prior consent, as I recorded it with my phone or whatever, so it is mine under copyright law. Even still photos belong to the photographer, or the person who purchased full rights of use from the photographer. Music, same thing. So how can someone piece together other peoples work and sell it to Netflix? I don't think that is legal.

[@rosalielibario9781]

Thanks Peter this was an awesome video. I won't be watching it. I got to watch the real thing. That was enough. And Camille is a awesome lawyer .

[@Marshab247]

I’m distressed it’s in the top 10. I was hoping nobody would watch it.

[@AresFordwin]

My reaction, being a first-time viewer of this channel: "When did Milo Ventimiglia become a lawyer?"

[@alexkasper5029]

I have always got bad vibes from Amber Heard and a fondness for Johnny Depp, but when her allegations came out in 2016 I believed her and stopped supporting him. I started following the trial a couple weeks in, after Johnny's testimony, and when I was catching up on what had happened so far it made it clear that regardless of whether there had been physical abuse, she had still totally misrepresented their relationship dynamic in 2016 and the Op-Ed. Then rewatching Johnny's testimony and seeing Amber's testimony in real time, the evidence spoke for itself. Of course some people online went too far in their criticism of Amber and some of it could be considered harassment, but all of the criticism I saw came from a place of outrage that she had lied about something so serious and had really harmed survivors in the process. The survivors who watched the trial and shared their experience really informed my perspective on the trial, and seeing the pain and anger they felt bc of her lies was extremely powerful. I still find it frustrating that people who didn't watch the trial will often discredit Johnny's win by saying that it was a toxic relationship and he was most likely verbally and emotionally abusive so the lack of evidence of physical abuse didn't matter. That disregards the fact that they audio tapes that overwhelmingly showed her verbal and emotional were the most compelling evidence in the trial. But it also makes it seem like she was justified in making up the claims of physical evidence bc it was a toxic relationship regardless. But that is not how she has ever portrayed the relationship. If she had given that context it would have always allowed for doubt to creep in. Exaggerating abuse allegations does so much harm to real victims and seeing people flippantly dismiss it is so infuriating, especially bc the verdict in Johnny's favor was actually a positive thing for domestic abuse survivors. I think the media failed survivors in their misleading coverage of the trial and did serious damage by implying that the justice system is biased against them. In my experience, when the court of public opinion turns so overwhelmingly, it is usual in response to facts not just dog-piling. People don't like being lied to.

[@peachespavalko1980]

Thanks for doing this, Peter. I wasn’t aware she was interviewed. ❓Constructive criticism, if I may please? It happens frequently, but this time it was *pretty bad.* The sound volume between you & the interview was extreme, making me constantly flip the volume back & forth in order to make it through.😩 I think I’m gunna watch Netflix again to see if I feel the same about on the 2nd go 'round.

[@tinacrichton7109]

I watched it, surprisingly. Guess I just can't get enough, and I was curious.

[@amandarichards3717]

Netflix and channel4 have no rights to us Andy footage . No permission to us

[@MoonDragon1]

The Netflix show was trying to defend ambers “donating” and that was shady. Same with I don’t know why this came in. It was definitely slanted. They tried to keep it from going off the rails compared to the reporters amber paid to give bs

[@PhoebeMc]

Agreed. I disagree it's a balanced mockumentary!!

[@chellbell7899]

That part did bug me and a lot of it at the end but other than that it showed the trial how it went down

[@jennm7897]

how it showed her over agin looking stupid on the donating vs pledging

[@MoonDragon1]

@@jennm7897 yeah but they did it weird like they were giving examples trying to defend her almost but it backfired 😂 like lots of people pledge… yeah but they then donate the money they pledge.

[@Michellef1117]

I was a victim of DV and I unfairly sided with AH. The first day into the trial I realized something was very very off. I feel so guilty and so stupid for blindly believing the woman solely because I was a woman DV survivor Men deserve better than the treatment JD got

[@karyntownsend]

I thought that Netflix had a deal with Andy & Popcorned Planet,since they used Andy's,huge moment with JD. Had I known that they didn't,I'd never have seen it. I'll go so far to STOP,having Netflix starting as of NOW.. Next month and forward will I NEVER PAY A DIME TO NETFLIX... BOYCOTT BOYCOTT BOYCOTT 💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥💥

[@lilychats5317]

Doing the same

[@KaylaReeves-oo2tg]

I came here to see how Camille reacted to the Netflix show, but I don't even know what they're talking about about at this point because this man telling this story is so gorgeous...wasn't ready for that omg

[@clintgreggory2549]

This fantastic attorney, even if she found a negative w the netflix trash , would never say it.

[@sweeney.family]

I had no knowledge prior to the case and found it fascinating

[@Rebecca-GLaines]

Im just ready for the movie! People that watched the docuseries and not the teial will be so confused 😂😂 Edit* And the makeup pallet, I dont recall ANYONE hating on Milani for coming forward. Everyone I seen was praising them for that. Netflix made it look as though the majority of the public hated that 😂

[@robynnoel8084]

Replay Crew..I had to miss u last night so I could finish the 3rd episode. I didn't wanna hear what u thought till I seen it all ❤❤

[@mr_rn6549]

Webster's Dictionary would disagree with Amber about the meaning of the word synonymous or synonymously . That was really bad form on Amber's part.

[@domone1201]

The amount of people that automatically “believe all woman” is terrifying.

[@vinachamp8270]

Netflix has blocked Popcorned Planet’s use of his own video footage on youtube claiming copyright infringement, after infringing on HIS copyright. I understand that is illegal. Are you sure you want to support this mockumentary?

[@coffeecupcraftswithkelly2826]

I’d be really interested to see what, if there is any, type of follow up with AH’s attorney, Elaine and how this trial has affected her career.

[@kathyclark6435]

I didn’t watch the Netflix show. No intention to watch Netflix with so many other options!

[@barbarabunker2791]

Camille is a class act. Johnny’s team put on a compelling case. Amber was just demanding to be believed but she didn’t have the evidence to back her up.