Real Lawyer Reacts to SheHULK

[@occamshalberd2313]

"Is my client guilty? Well that's debatable"

[@brunobattistini1694]

Yeah I mean, no shit you’re debating it right now

[@JordanMcCoy03]

@@brunobattistini1694 I'm saying bro. Like dude, that's literally what I came to court for 🤨

[@captainblue5096]

Depends on what you think guilty means

[@door1852]

Why do i read this with saul goodman voice

[@briankaslewicz6130]

Depending on your definition of "debatable"

[@joelhaggis5054]

"Is my client guilty? I don't know, I'm not a lawyer."

[@nummnutz7046]

“But! He was ambitious. Isn’t that honorable?”

[@strangerparti]

Thanks for cracking me up

[@shinkaiatsuya950]

That depends on your defination of guilty

[@Atown610]

@@shinkaiatsuya950 true

[@AmericanIdiot7659]

"Well age is just a number, your honor."

[@quentinwolfe2302]

“Your honor, my client claims oopsie-daisy”

[@JLF201]

LE doing a video of applying the oopsie-daisy rule in a defense would make a good April Fool's prank.

[@henrybradford3648]

This had me laughing way louder than it should’ve

[@samgyeopsal569]

“Case dismissed”

[@isaacnelson4503]

Death

[@senko---san]

"My client claims ' *Nuh-uh* '"

[@meebo8014]

”Is my client guilty, that is debatable” ”Do you know what you are debating about?” ”That depends on your definition of knowing your honour”

[@georgesconyers9769]

Attempting to give the jury an epistemological induced breakdown is a bold strategy

[@blizzard1198]

​@@georgesconyers9769 He must be thinking he's the philosopher😂

[@RealHunterVR]

999 likes

[@meebo8014]

@@RealHunterVR 1k now

[@RealHunterVR]

@@meebo8014 nice!!!

[@eugeemz]

"Your honor, my client did it for the vine"

[@DanGRV]

"Sir, let me remind you that we no longer 'do it for the vine' "

[@stevenstokes6306]

"Your ho or, my client is simply built different "

[@htavli]

"Your honor, it was just a prank, bro."

[@Tommy.Gaming]

Would have been a better argument

[@sablewhim]

Im ded af😂😂

[@eclair4648]

The closing argument was so terrible, I really have to agree. This is why the lawsuit will probably not be thrown out like they probably want.

[@yunofun]

As bad as the closing argument was, I am willing to bet if we looked not too terribly hard we could find a few cases that made the same argument...

[@MaeveHarrison-161]

@@yunofun I wish I thought you were wrong, I really, really do.

[@BlazeMakesGames]

@@yunofun yeah lets be real the way it was written was clearly to help exposit the general nature of the case. But given that nature, it's also the kind of defense I'd expect for a case like that lol

[@434444334]

i bet you its revieled that that villian was paid extra to ruin the court meeting so it would get thrown out

[@SarastistheSerpent]

@@yunofun there are a lot of really bad lawyers out there, and a lot of people have used the “depends on your definition of “knowing” line.

[@TheScrubExpress]

The most realistic part, lawyer-wise, was how her Hulking out and saving the jury resulted in a mistrial and her losing her job. No superhero could realistically do a jury trial and expect the jury to be unbiased.

[@zachryder3150]

Matt Murdock: *Heavy sweating*

[@TheScrubExpress]

@@zachryder3150 but he's a SECRET superhero lawyer

[@Coldheart322]

@@TheScrubExpress yes, but if he ever gets found out...

[@EinDose]

@@Coldheart322 But that's nonsense, everyone knows that Matt Murdock, blind lawyer, cannot possibly be Daredevil, blind vigilante!

[@beaconofwierd1883]

Wait, people know Daredevil is blind? I though he pretended to be able to see? And I thought he was a secret super hero as in the public doesn’t know he exists?

[@tukatl]

“Your honour, my client is simply built different”

[@Xx_babanne_avcisi27_xX]

your honor, my client was engaging in minor amounts of tomfoolery

[@3down4togo]

“Did my client know people where dying? Maaaaaybe”

[@Northdracula]

“My client said ‘deadass’”

[@wiscopolo44]

“Some of you may die…. But that’s a sacrifice I’m willing to make!”

[@timothyjohnson5699]

"I'm not a messenger boy!... ...😏I'm a delivery boy."

[@tmbpotatoe5975]

seems like an honest and respectable man i accept!

[@hoskinsfilms6227]

NOT THE BUTTONS! NOT MY GUMDROP BUTTONS!

[@rifasclub]

*Applause*

[@alantremonti1381]

"Stop dieing, you cowards!"

[@Speed_Of_Light186]

"...His right to protect business interest" Me: Sounds okay "These accidental deaths..." Me: well shit!

[@callmeobsequious]

@mipmipmipmipmip Too real!!

[@mosspally6995]

Yeh I was thinking it was some self defence thing during a riot. Nope, pure corporate malpractice.

[@painvillegaming4119]

@@mosspally6995 considering disney is writing the show am surprised there not the good guys Then again jen is so detestable

[@yesyouareright9800]

Wonder why every aspect in a liberal woke movie is complete utter dog shit, does like their IQ drop by 50 instantly?

[@davidguthary8147]

This case definitely seems like it would have been a slam dunk for Walters, had it not been for the superhero shenanigans forcing a mistrial.

[@lukedodson3267]

There's already a theory circulating that Holloway knew the case was a lost cause and orchestrated the Titania incident to force a mistrial and out Walters as a superhero so she'd be ousted from the DA's office. Again, probably not a sound legal strategy but...superhero show.

[@clearviewmoai]

@@lukedodson3267 If it didn't have the worst writing of any marvel TV show (that's saying a lot considering some of their other shows), that might have been a decent plot line.

[@Kriegter]

"your honour, nuh-uh"

[@crazynachos4230]

The best part is that Jen has not one but TWO degrees and still breaks laws on countless occasions throughout the show

[@mrHippo-ln6gi]

"Your honor, I'm pretty sure my clients not guilty"

[@RetroFan2.0]

The writers of the show literally admitted they didn’t hire any professional expertise on how to write a court case or lawyering for that matter for she hulk in general.

[@jodinsan]

That seems like a poor decision especially if you are going to write a 4th wall joke _from your main character_ about this being a legal show.

[@churchofthelambofsat]

What the hell...

[@nicripolas816]

Doesn't surprise me in the slightest

[@JH-wd6dp]

"literally"

[@WilliamWizer]

they hired writers? as in, professional writers? why didn't they write the show then? for what do they hired them?

[@addy3164]

The writers flat out admitted they don’t know how to write courtroom scenes for a LAWYER show 😂

[@ShugoAWay]

They don't know how to write for any show from what I saw in that entire season as they lampshaded all plot out failed at basic 4th wall pieces to camera undercut all stakes and failed at basic physics

[@addy3164]

@@ShugoAWay The She-Hulk finale should be taught at film school…in classes as an example for bad writing and how to avoid it

[@ShugoAWay]

@@addy3164 no the whole season with the only upsides and reason i didn't give up by episode 2 was the cameos of wong and emil and the blind lawyer and off chance there might be a detail that became cannon in universe

[@carlpanzram7081]

Not to Mention that the writer is extremely racist and sexist.

[@JesterQueenAnne]

Not really, this "argument" has probably been used at least once before in real courtrooms. You're assuming competence and/or intellectual honesty from all lawyers.

[@risingmoon893]

This should be a case study for lawyers for exactly what not to say.

[@microcolonel]

it's too absurd to serve even as that.

[@Putin_Gaming15]

Bro hired his lawyer on Fiverr 💀💀

[@Sinsabre]

I laughed so hard when I heard the "depends on your definition"-line. Instantly thought of Bill Clinton's famous: -"It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is."

[@dubious_potat4587]

it would be like saying "did you shoot that man in the face" "well it depends on your definition of shooting someone in the face"

[@WayneWerner]

100%

[@_blank-_]

I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATlONS WITH THAT WOMAN

[@SJNaka101]

​@@dubious_potat4587"did he shoot? Yes. Did the bullet hit that guys face? Also yes. HOWEVER,"

[@tzeneth]

As a UCLA Law Graduate, I support this message :P (Also, holy moly that is a bad closing argument just from the clips you showed)

[@LM11116]

those clips were the entirety of the closing argument in the show. supposedly that's the best firm there is in the area

[@tzeneth]

@@LM11116 Then they should hire outside attorneys because that was beyond bad. A basic undergraduate mock trialer could give a better closing...

[@Khunkurisu]

The show is a comedy. It’s normal for LE to take it seriously (I mean, he did with the Bird Law stuff), but outside the context of the video, you guys can understand that the joke was how bad it was, right?

[@AndrewMcColl]

@@tzeneth it's not a spoiler, but in the second episode the firm (GLKH) hires She-Hulk as the head of their new superhero division. She goes from opposing them in court, to working for them a few days later.

[@tzeneth]

@@AndrewMcColl That sounds like a large "Conflict of Interest" issue in the making...

[@jamjam1]

This was all about celebrating UCLA wasn't it? lol

[@joefutofu]

UCLA is stinky

[@Najolve]

@@joefutofu I read that as "UCLA is sticky"...now that's UF's territory!

[@Klaaism]

Go Bruins

[@firdaus99031]

@@Klaaism Go in ruins?

[@nikkishirazi7292]

@@Klaaism GO BRUINS

[@froggycolouring]

“Your honor, my client claims it was just a prank bro”

[@zbeebs]

Can't wait for your full analysis of the show, especially the "trademarking 'She-Hulk'" episode.

[@toriesout8692]

I loved that one, it was interesting. I'll say that much 😂😂😂

[@bikebudha01]

I really hope this turns into a recurring segment....

[@wengfunn4609]

No

[@napoleonbonerfarte6739]

He said he was gonna do every episode of BCS and then did one and never returned to it

[@bikebudha01]

@@napoleonbonerfarte6739 but this is SHE HULK, way more fun...

[@holdenennis]

@@napoleonbonerfarte6739 he did two

[@ttthecat]

Yes please!

[@genebrowder3636]

Your Honor. I would like to state that the defendant and his lawyer's bias toward the Bruins is the mitigating factor of why we are here today (joke).

[@jamjam1]

TV lawyer: That depends on your definition of "bias"

[@videogajima]

“That depends on what you think the definition of is… is.”

[@cailin5301]

I was looking for this comment

[@Nogdog945]

A surprise for certain, but a welcome one

[@dhans9662]

Bro probably presents the attorney badge when playing Ace Attorney 💀

[@morganfitch8325]

"Your Honor, my client claims 'It's just a prank, bro.'"

[@jamisondonald384]

The show is written as essentially a comedy. This scene made me laugh out loud. It felt like something from Futurama or The Simpsons.

[@OneWingedRose]

This! Even as an everyperson I could tell it was a terrible argument but it was funny to watch!

[@nicripolas816]

Ew

[@jimballard1186]

I thought it was a Bill Clinton joke I'm too young and/or ignorant to fully get.

[@wcookiv]

"Definition of knowing" made me laugh out loud again just watching the clip.

[@krishp1104]

Tired of fanboys excusing shitty writing

[@epicsamurai5]

The writers did not hire legal experts for a legal show. I don’t remember who, but someone said it would distract from the comedy. Clearly they never saw My Cousin Vinny.

[@clearviewmoai]

Obviously they didn't hire any experts for any part of the show, amateur air-your-agenda writers and producers all round

[@cadethumann8605]

Plus, there was that simpsons episode with the court case about itchy and scratchy (which LE covered). Yes, various elements are unrealistic but it still brings up interesting law points and it was done funnier.

[@wcookiv]

I'd expect such a big fan of Lionel Hutz to be more appreciative of the cartoonishly callous and tortured defense.

[@kamenraider1175]

I think the difference is that Lionel Hutz is meant to be a budget lawyer whereas (based on his client) this guy is meant to be an expensive corporate lawyer

[@hurricanedude5090]

That closing argument literally admits to murder 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@gamingdoge3351]

They found that lawyers contact on the back of a plastic bottle 💀

[@himagainstill]

This seems like the sort of charge the defendant's lawyers might have wanted settled rather than proceeding to trial.

[@princecharon]

The defendant's lawyers were very confident, due to the writers deciding that the defendant would hire complete idiots (perhaps the law firm is owned by the defendant's brother-in-law?).

[@himagainstill]

@@princecharon Has the Supreme Court ever weighed in on the doctrine of plot armour? Seems like it might be fertile ground.

[@Bebop17]

The writers admitted that they had no idea how to write compelling legal drama

[@SimonBuchanNz]

[citation needed]

[@ImAlsoMerobiba]

Thanks for confirming my suspicion. It sounded bad but when they reacted as though it was amazing, I was so confused as to what I was missing.

[@zeroone871]

Hmmm I saw it as they were reacting to how bad an argument it was.

[@seandobbins2231]

The show is good, this particular legal argument was just bad. To be fair, it's not even among the worst we've seen some high-priced lawyers make in recent years.

[@Kobanermani]

“Your honor, my client pleaded under tomfoolery charges.”

[@MaskMan1Official]

“By the rules “You are what you eat”, my client is an innocent man.”

[@pavarottiaardvark3431]

To be fair, the second episode features the head of that law firm admitting that they already knew that they'd lost the case.

[@LarryJ602]

"How terrible the closing argument was at the end." That's not the most terrible thing...

[@davidbodor1762]

Let's be honest though, there's definitely some real lawyers that make equally if not worse arguments sometimes.

[@thegreatwillthethrill]

"Objection hearsay." That was your own question...

[@johnr797]

@@thegreatwillthethrill "Yeah but can we strike it anyways? Also can we take a recess so I can figure out how this microphone works?"

[@nicripolas816]

Amber Heard's whole ass team lol

[@SarastistheSerpent]

@@nicripolas816 lol that’s exactly what I was thinking. The lawyer in this scene is like a fictionalized version of Amber’s lawyer

[@elfteiroh]

*CoughAlexCoughJonesCough*

[@BaneofBots]

“Your honour, if you are what you eat, then my client is an innocent man.”

[@ProwoodStuff]

“Your Honor, my client said he did it to impress Batman”

[@Luna_Rafael99]

I want you to do a full episode on She-Hulk, after season 1 is finished

[@Mystrohan]

After that closing argument, hearing about the conflict waiver in the next episode was comparatively inoffensive.

[@BlueDog241]

I really hope you talk about this show some more. I've heard that the writers admitted they didn't know how to write court room drama. Seems like a bad idea having them write a show about lawyers.

[@BlueDog241]

@@williamcurtis2145 because drama is part of comedy. They're writing a show about Lawyers and admitted they don't know anything about the thing they are writing. Might be kind of important.

[@BossKnight]

“You see, my client was just goofing around your honor”

[@jakewhiston6461]

Your honour, my clients friends said "no balls"

[@slospop1125]

When I heard that closing statement it seemed so bad that I thought the lawyer was trying to lose.

[@steelguru]

A lot of people are missing the fact that She-Hulk is a sitcom.

[@WilliamWizer]

I have never seen a worse sitcom ever. and I'm 46. almost 47.

[@WhatKindOfNameNow]

@@WilliamWizer So, you've watched... What? Two or three sitcoms in your life?

[@robertt9342]

@@WilliamWizer . I won’t argue about whether you should or should not like the show, it’s subjective, but to say you’ve never seen a worse sitcom implies one of two things. 1) You have a very limited experience in watching sitcoms. 2) You are a liar.

[@alphanerd7221]

@@WilliamWizer You shouldn't brag about being a middle aged man with the mentality of a bitter 14 year old boy.

[@WilliamWizer]

@@alphanerd7221 am I bragging? I'm saying that in more than four decades I have never seen a worse sitcon. is that bragging? of what I'm exactly bragging? of being 46? of she hulk being, in my opinion, the worst sitcon I have seen?

[@charleshollowell8398]

I’ve been waiting for his reaction I didn’t think he would get through an episode lol

[@yoshikatsu_kira]

"Objection! That's ridiculous! Um, because... Mr. Wright can't lose!"

[@adamyusuf1805]

Im not a lawyer and I noticed how bad that Closing Statement was

[@KCreep]

I heard they cut a ton of scenes from this show because they said the writers couldn't write compelling court room drama. TO me that's just hilarious with the title of the show being She-Hulk Attorney at Law.

[@alphanerd7221]

Stupid people hear a lot of stupid things and like to repeat them.

[@Nimelennar]

I'm more interested in: 1. How good was Jen's closing argument, and 2. Would an attorney saving the lives of a jury during a trial really be grounds for a mistrial?

[@jamjam1]

I assume they would just get a new jury and start over. Which may be what a mistrial leads to? (I'm not a lawyer and I dont play one on tv). Show made it seem like the defendant was let go of all charges though

[@sapphirII]

I'm also interested in, would it be legal for the firm to hire Jennifer Walters/She-Hulk, and require her to practice law only in hulk form?

[@johnr797]

2. Of course, how could you expect impartiality after that? I didn't watch the show, but I mean obviously it would be. Just like if a defense attorney started a relationship with a jury member.

[@rkhound247]

I think the mistrial thing would stick.

[@AndromedaD]

@@sapphirII Because there aren't mutants, and the Sokovia Accord seemed to only cover Avengers, I doubt there are super power anti-discrimination laws. Yet.

[@Brinkalski]

I'm pretty sure the closing argument dialogue was meant as a joke, but yeah

[@bigbigbigbigbigman]

Yeah but the problem is that they were delivered with all the comedic timing of a courtroom drama.

[@alphanerd7221]

@@bigbigbigbigbigman You not getting comedy doesn't make it bad.

[@bigbigbigbigbigman]

@Alpha Nerd I get it. It ain't making me laugh but I get it. To be clear I like the show so no need to get defensive about a tiny bit of negative critism. It just wasn't that great of a joke.

[@alphanerd7221]

@@bigbigbigbigbigman No. You don't get it. You are clearly very ignorant.

[@グルイズビオ]

@@alphanerd7221 but its bad

[@Mr_Mystic]

the only person who could pull off that type of claim is saul.

[@thepanamericanworldairways]

Your honor, my client wasn’t commiting war crimes, he was simply vibing

[@Gebohq]

If recent history (and this channel) have reminded me anything as of late, it's that however stupid we see things in fiction, it's not as stupid as in real life.

[@rkhound247]

Sad but true 😔

[@markcarr5142]

"You want me to drink you? But I'm in the middle of a trial. (glug glig glug)." -Lionel Hutz, attorney? At law?

[@scooterdooter]

Guess you haven't seen the 2nd episode. SPOILER: Yeah, the argument was so bad that Jen was a shoo in for a win -- until she rescued the jury from a surprise attack from Titania, and a mistrial was declared because nobody thought the jury could be impartial after having their lives saved by one of the attorneys.

[@lizdevine2525]

I had the same reaction when he called Daredevil's (would-be) closing argument in The Trial of Frank Castle "unrealistic", without taking into account the fact that Foggy literally tells Matt off for likely throwing their whole defence with his stunt. I feel like "realism" needs to have room in it for there literally just being bad lawyering as long as characters in the show acknowledge it.

[@alphanerd7221]

@@lizdevine2525 Yeah, it's absurd to pretend any fictional lawyer is to bad to be realistic when Rudi Giuliani and that scarecrow that defended Amber Heard running around.

[@cadenbrown4187]

"Your honor, the voices told my client to do it"

[@Chicken9112]

"if you are what you eat then my client is innocent" this is what energy that argument has

[@ryokukagirinai]

" did they kill innocent people? Yeah. Was it worth it? Maybe, 🤔 The defense rests"

[@jerryborjon]

I loved her interactions with the Hulk. We need to see more of both of them.

[@joefutofu]

yes I agree

[@nicripolas816]

Ew, you did? You mean like the one where she talks about how she deals with anger more than him? The guy who had his mom killed by his father, had the love of his life die, and even tried to unsuccessfully commit suicide? You mean interactions like that? Nah, screw that whole terrible show. There's a reason nobody's watching it.

[@davidbodor1762]

@@nicripolas816 You mean how she is instantly proven wrong the next episode or how Bruce having mental health problems, a split personality and possibly PTSD makes him worse at dealing with anger because the symptoms of PTSD include iritability, anger outbursts and paranoia all of which take a lot of time to get over and Jen doesn't need to deal with any of that, so of course she'd feel like she can handle the stresses of lawyer life, since that's what she's been doing for a long time now and she doesn't want to be a superhero?

[@alexnoack9941]

@@nicripolas816 that is the point of the scene (hopefully), she is wrong and needs to grow as a character. She even lost her cool as she said she was better at dealing with her anger, she's like tony early on, egotistical and self centered. I believe they are giving her a low starting point so she becomes someone better

[@nicripolas816]

Both responses above me are really bad attempts at coping with the obvious pandering that was that scene. Pathetic.

[@brittneygilchrist2744]

I was looking forward to hearing her argument 😂

[@CharginChuck]

I mean, she did give it, at the beginning of the episode when she was preparing for the trial, that's exactly what the entire opening monologue of the show was. And yeah, it definitely would have beaten that (almost definitely intentionally) terrible argument.

[@alphanerd7221]

@@CharginChuck It's so wild that people can't tell that's a joke. It's like saying Mr. Burns is terrible at employee outreach.

[@nagyba]

Hollywood doesn't have a few thousand bucks to hire a lawyer for a lawyer scene

[@Crusade6539]

“Your honor, my client was playing free bird.” *Instant W argument*

[@ToniGlick]

I don't know about the lawyering but I have to watch she-hulk to get my Tatiana fix. I've really missed her since Orphan Black.

[@fourcatsandagarden]

now that you've watched the first episode, I'm really curious on what you have to say on the second one, cos there's much more behind the scenes lawyer stuff there

[@aucarter]

Yes, please update us

[@nicripolas816]

No there isn't. There's literally nothing accurate to the career in the show. There's just poor writing.

[@fourcatsandagarden]

@@nicripolas816 your comment doesn't negate my comment. accuracy doesn't change the fact that it's interesting to watch a lawyer react to a lawyer show anymore than accuracy affects the interestingness of watching a doctor react to a doctor show. heck, inaccuracy may make it even more interesting.

[@Nephrite_Harmony]

please do a full video reacting once the series is over, as of right now there's 2/9 episodes released

[@TheBrokenRobot]

Yes. I have a feeling we're probably going to be given more questionable trials in the coming weeks.

[@WannabeCanadianDev]

YES!!! Please do more reacts to She-Hulk!!! I would love to see your breakdown on what parts don't make sense professionally but what parts DO make sense! The latest episode (5) has some good lawyering so far I think but not a lawyer so I don't know for sure!

[@safwatnuman4297]

Clearly the closing argument was that bad intentionally. I’m not a lawyer and I was cracking up because it was a stupid point to make.

[@sammyjones8279]

I would say those arguments are unrealistic but I watched the Jones trial so all bets are off

[@nicripolas816]

That whole thing was dumber than any writers could come up with. Lol I think the Onion even said something to that effect.

[@lizdevine2525]

TRUE!!!

[@SarastistheSerpent]

And don’t forget Amber Heards lol. This year has been a smorgasbord of bad yet entertaining trials

[@videocliplover]

Please do a full video on SheHulk!

[@MouseGoat]

yeah no, this was more than enough lol

[@wadesultan5074]

I'm a Bruin and I support this message!

[@ArcticSnow930]

"That's a terrible argument" With enough money, it's a great argument

[@HANDLEDOWN]

“Your honor, it is what it is.”

[@ThePanuccio]

To be fair, it´s not a courtroom show. It´s a comedy.

[@riolufistofmight]

it's really really REALLY really not funny.

[@nicripolas816]

Well it isn't very good at that, either

[@OneWingedRose]

@@riolufistofmight Funny enough to get a Lawyer Reacts video on the ridiculousness of the joke XD (edit - aka quite funny)

[@nicripolas816]

@@OneWingedRose That's a terrible argument considering all he did was point out how terrible something was. Never once mentioned thinking it was funny.

[@jerryborjon]

@@nicripolas816 - Why are you replying to every comment just to say how much you hate the show? That’s just sad, dude. Move on. It’s fine to disagree with other people.

[@frequency280]

My lawyer housemate and I love this show. It’s a fun comedy so even though that court scene stuck out, we both still had a good laugh in the good way

[@kedarguruu]

this is like a physicist's critique of Wile E. Coyote running off a cliff and not falling until he realizes he should be falling

[@dryoshiyahu]

So in other words, the courtroom dialogue in She-hulk is cartoonishly bad?

[@ignorance_is_not_bliss]

"your honor, my client was in a silly goofy mood"

[@theworldsgreatestjidiot9667]

I'd trust Saul goodman with my legal case more than her

[@masterpink6963]

Please do a Whole lawyer reacts to the series

[@nicripolas816]

Don't torture him

[@masterpink6963]

@@nicripolas816 what’s wrong with she hulk it’s a good show

[@nicripolas816]

@@masterpink6963 No it isn't. And you're in the small minority for thinking it is.

[@masterpink6963]

@@nicripolas816 fu

[@masterpink6963]

@@nicripolas816 just because it’s not the average marvel show doesn’t mean it’s bad

[@tomwilson2112]

I am eagerly awaiting a full reaction/analysis video of all Jenn’s courtroom appearances. I really enjoyed the courtroom scenes in the last episode (the DA vs the shape shifting elf.) Hopefully the Legal Eagle will take on the She Hulk - and win.

[@ypw510]

That one was just bizarre. Especially the judge in a civil trial summarily sentencing the defendant to jail time for impersonating the judge. Not a lawyer, but I was under the impression that a prosecutor would need to be involved, along with the right to request a jury trial.

[@clearviewmoai]

@@ypw510 Yes it would. It's just shit writing but marvel is famous for that now.

[@Pyriphlegeton]

"Depends on your definition of knowing" is basically an exact quote from Jordan Peterson when he didn't want to define his religious beliefs to Sam Harris.

[@jimballard1186]

Oh yeah. I thought it was a Clinton joke, but in the context of the show, a Peterson joke makes a lot more sense. Thanks for pointing that out!

[@johnr797]

I mean, it's pretty normal for someone to not be able to define exactly what their religious beliefs are.

[@jimballard1186]

@@johnr797 Not if you write books that insist the ability to speak precisely in all manners is one of the chief virtues.

[@johnr797]

@@jimballard1186 Do you think maybe that's why he didn't want to speak to something that personal that would take serious consideration to respond to in a way he felt was true to his thoughts on it?

[@jimballard1186]

@@johnr797 No. I've seen him refuse across multiple interviews with multiple people. If he still can't articulate his beliefs, then he is either immensely lazy or he is hiding something.

[@sernoddicusthegallant6986]

"Is my client guilty? Well what is guilt really? An admission that one has done wrong? Well what is wrong really? An action that causes more suffering than good? Well what is suffering really? A chemical reaction in our brain that causes pain or distress? Well what is distress really? Your honor this should clearly be filed as a mistrial as all the jury have just been rendered comatose"

[@yeetdagamer8546]

Your honor I plead "nuh-uh"

[@johnnycucumber]

Would Jennifer Walters have cause of action for a wrongful termination suit?

[@rkhound247]

I wondered about that myself, especially since her boss said that she did the right thing. Then I remembered that it's a comic book

[@scooterdooter]

@@rkhound247 Well, were in it this deep. Might as well see what's around while we're here.

[@elfteiroh]

From what I read, New York is an “at-will” state, so no, you can be fired for no reason there.

[@alphanerd7221]

No.

[@johnnycucumber]

@@elfteiroh In at at-will state, you can be fired for no reason. But if they give a reason, it has to be valid. Their reason for firing her was that she saved the life of the jury, resulting in a mistrial.

[@johngerity]

FULL EP PLEASE. Justify my Nebula subscription.

[@AhmetwithaT]

I was half jokingly hoping they make a show where they focused on the mundane instead of the Super of a superhero. Is this show it? Is it a good legal drama?

[@joefutofu]

is it?

[@caoslance66]

it is

[@zenko4187]

so far, its been a good balance. I suspect its going to slide in the superhero stuff though

[@shinra528]

It’s a legal comedy.

[@nicripolas816]

Listen to none of these comments. It's bad. Period

[@ashhplayz9489]

"your honor, my client's crime is debatable"

[@tmage23]

"It depends on your definition of know" sounds like a reference to Bill Clinton's famous "It depends on your definition of 'is'"

[@R0bilicious]

It’s meant to be a terrible argument since this show is more comedic.

[@scooterdooter]

People decided what they wanted this show to be before they even saw it LOL Then they accuse the SHOW of being illogical, too funny, no self-awareness

[@shock_dr47]

Almost all of the modern marvel movies are comedies that it isn't even funny anymore

[@MMuraseofSandvich]

"A bunch of people died because we were ambitiously expanding our business" Terrible argument, yes. However, this is precisely how a disturbing number of businessmen think. Remember, the ethos of business is, "It's nothing personal, it's just business."

[@badelementofstyle5238]

The closing argument was a joke, this is a comedy show

[@Leonardo-we4po]

I GENUINELY thought you were Ryan Reynolds for a SOLID 3 seconds 😂

[@PurpleLobster7]

Can you react to better call saul? Or did you already did it?

[@Lewej1]

He already did! It was an episode between Jimmy and Chuck at the court, if I recall.