May be their property and everything fall under India that is why they decided to be with India.The leaders thought just for their personal things and forgot Sikhs as a whole at that time.same thing is happening with us now a days.Sikhs need a leadership who can bring radical changes.we don’t know what is gonna happen in the times come
@warringtribes6689 Жыл бұрын
You can still get in Pakistan, try it there. Lahore is in Pakistan.
@lovelylovely9483 Жыл бұрын
Te punjabi hi punjabi naal dhakka krde dekhe gye ji..Poorvia nu punjab dedicate krke.?
Gall eh karo raaj di ki sabh to vadhia te peaceful secular economically stable strong raaj kihda c, oh c sikh raaj, ese layi asi oh sikh raaj khaalsa raaj chaunde aa jo maharaja ranjit singh ne karke vikhaya, koi historian gall ni kar reha ki panjabi soobe de hakka de vaydeyan da ki hoya? Panjab de hakk kyun khohe gye? Panjab de resources nu kyun luttya jaa reha? Unnatural way naal rajasthan nu paani de ke irrigation kyun promote kiti ja rahi panjab da pani khoh ke jad ki pani di lod sabh to vadh panjab te haryane nu hai te eh water levels rajasthan di lutt karan down ho rahe, pani ditte vi without royality ja rahe jad ki sanu kujh muft nhi dinda rajasthan marbel etc, fer gall karo injustice di, sikh katleaam di, guru ghara te hamle di, sadi hond nu khatam karan diya koshisha genocides, drug issue te 84 da justice? Fer dogle kanoon, sikh saza poorj kar ke vi riha nhi, ulta sikha nu baahrle mulka ch vi marwaya ja reha te bharat vich vi nsa laa ke dakke ja rahe jo peacefully dialogue karna chaunde....KHALISTAAN HI HALL🙏🏽🙏🏽
Angreja toh pehla 11 sikh misla apis ch fight kiti..Te chukchakia misl jitt gyi c..Te King Ranjit singh Raja bnya c..1849 AD oh Raaj chla gya 1947 nu Punjab bharat da part bniya..Ki asi Britain nu dosh deye..Hun ki bnega punjab da..sadi mitti da..samjhota te sabr hi krna better hoga..Hun punjab nu Poorvi te bihaari luttan nu age.doshi sirf punjabi boli wali sarkar va jo Assembly ch law pass nahi krdi..prefered to be punjabis only..eh law hona chahida va..?
@gurwindersidhu6542 Жыл бұрын
@@dgpsingh6704saare Sikh nhi Sirf oh Sikh jehde direct British rule ch reh rahe ce , yaad karo punjab ch 8 riyasata be cn, jinna da rule 1958 tak reha, 1947 ch 2 nhi 3 parts ch Punjab divide kita ce ek part muslim nu dita gya Pakistan da part bna ke dusra hissa sikha de hindu nu dita India ch rakh ke te 13 districts da alagh Raaj bnaya gya pepsu Raaj tusi pepsu kai buses te likhea dekhea hona jo us time ch suru hoya ce, pepsu Raaj ch 8 riyasata ce jinna cho 5 Sikh kingdoms 1 muslim Kingdom te 2 hindu Kingdom cn, es ly eh na kaho ke saare Sikha nu Raaj Baldev Singh karke nhi milya, 5 Sikh kingdoms kol pura right ce aapna Raaj bnon da, te unna ne bnaya be ce 1958 tak pr us time maaje de Sikha ne saath nhi ditta ulta unna ne enna te pressure paya je punjab de area nu bdon ly riyasat da Raaj khatam karke 13 districts be Punjab ch mila den es ly 1958 ch Sikh Raaj khatam ho gya
Bilkul sahi hey. Virodhi dhir vich hondey ne tanh chuteh vadey kardey han.Satta vich aundeya hi ehena da muh band ho janda hey.Fir apni property bnan jut jande han.Eho je han sade Sikh leaders.
@RameshKumar-c6c7r5 ай бұрын
@@pamma2733 Bilkul sahi Paaji jado tusi keh rahe sikh leader murkh hun phir wakhra raaj le ke kidda desh chalaon GE awe wakhra wakhra karde rehnde. .
@pamma27335 ай бұрын
@@RameshKumar-c6c7r leader nalayak san Han nahi badhiya leader vi ne hun jehde bahar country's ch mnister ban ਸਕਦੇ ਨੇ ਓਹ ਅਪਣਾ ਦੇਸ਼ ਐਨ ਚਲਾ ਸਕਦੇ ਬਾਕੀ ਏਥੇ ਵਧੀਆ leadership paida ਹਾਂ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੋਣ ਦਿੱਤੀ ਹੈ ਵਧੀਆ ਲੀਡਰ ਹੋਇਆ ਓਹ ਮਾਰ ਦਿੱਤਾ ਗਿਆ
1941di mardan shumari ansar sirf tarn taarn tahsil nu shad. Ke hor kite v sikha di bauh ginti nhi c jatt jamina magar bhajde bhjde pure utri bhart vich khilr gay sn kite v angrejan nu sihka di Bahu ginti nhi disdi c oh chahundehoy vikujh na kr ske fer vatvara hoea Sikh lidar Dr amdemkar kol pahunche roe pite asi barbad ho ke ae haa Dr ne kiha TUC ta Abad hogae ho Sikh lidra ne pushiea kive taus ne kiha tuhadi kite v bhuginti nhi c hun tuci ik jagah Punjab vich ikthe ho gaye ho loktantR vich sdaa hi tuhada hi mukh mantri bnega mantry mandal vich tuhadi hi chalegi. Jo gallan tusi karde ho uh ik duje khilaf laedra vlo falayea afvaha to vadh kuj v nhi
Khatri sikh hi sikha nu lead kar sakdaee hai. Another sikh community doesn't have potential
@baljindersingh1184 Жыл бұрын
@@pritpalsingh1997Sikh is only SIKH, not Khatri SIKH.
@pritpalsingh1997 Жыл бұрын
@@baljindersingh1184 Veer ji mayee india di gal kkar reha hai, mangal greh tae sikh ,sikh hoega. Veer ji tusi apni wife , massad, nana, fuffad, chachi, apnaee mundaee da salla, kudi dae pakkaee, etc di caste ek page tae likho vekhnaee saree galti naal jaat hongaee. What a coinsidence. By chance ho gayaee honaee.
@baljindersingh1184 Жыл бұрын
@@pritpalsingh1997 J galti drusat kar diti ,tan eni takhleef kion.Sianey lok galti sun k thanks kardey han.Baki tery marzi.
किना चलाक आदमी ऐहो जेहे लोग हि हिस्ट्री बदलदे ब्राह्मण कोल पांचसो साल पुरानी हिस्ट्री कयाकि ब्राह्मण ने बहुत ठंडे सुबाहा दे साथ सब कुछ बदल दिया क्युकी सब से पहले ब्राह्मण ने राज नीति कब्जाई जितने बी बदेशी आऐ ब्राह्मण धोआरा लाऐ गए मुगल जा और जितने भी लोग आऐ सब ईनहोने बुलाऐ और रोटी बेटी कि सांझ रखि सिर्फ भारत के मुलनिबासीयो को दबाने केलिए सब चलें गए पर ब्राह्मण नहीं गया ओर आपनी पैहेचान बरकरार रखने में कामयाब अब तक हुआ अगर कोई हिन्दू धर्म में आना चाहाता है तो दलित बनसकता है पर ब्राह्मण नहीं बनसकता जा फिर कोई आपरी घटना जैसे बाबासाहेब जीको अपनी गरज केलिए क्यूंकि जो आमदोलन बाबासाहेब जी ने चला रखा था उप पर काबिज होने केलिए कुछ भी करसकता ब्राह्मण आपने खिलाफ उठती आबाज को दबाने केलिए कुछ भी करसकता है ब्राह्मण आपनी बेटी देने से भी नहीं पिशे नहीं हटता ईतना खतर नाक है ब्राह्मण
Indeed going by England perspective they wanted to return to all the communities as they have looted from them ie area wise, province wise and kingdom wise. So they wanted to give Maharaja Ranjit Singh's Kingdom obviously to Sikhs . All the princely states would have got their provinces back. In this way these so called majority communities would have got almost nothing .Shrewd Nehru could foresee this therefore he insisted on majority religion based devision. He knew if Sikhs demand separate state they will be given therefore he gave sugar Coated lollipops to the then sikh leadership who openly declared alliance to Nehru..... "Lamhone ne khatta ki hai aur sadion ne sazza pai hai "
Sikh raj is demanded just because it was the superior kingdom ever. Nothing personal. SALUTE TO SIKH RAJ AND SHOULD BE COME SOONER.
@NewYork0110J Жыл бұрын
Lets Demonstrate that making one in Canada and give world an example.
@pritpalsingh1997 Жыл бұрын
Sikh raaz = jaaat raaz . But asli sikhs are khatri sikh who are intellectual and intellejent. Jadtak khatri sikh sikhi nu lead nahi kardaee it is not possible for another sikhs
@HarpreetSingh-iy9lv Жыл бұрын
@@pritpalsingh1997what load of shit ? Sikhs always been together please take your shitty ideas to yourself
@HarpreetSingh-iy9lv Жыл бұрын
@@pritpalsingh1997you shit load is proven when khatri giving their daughters to Hindus and being happy to part of Hindu and get scared of conflicts every time, Guru sahb want a warrior and saint no just a business men
Je sikha di gll karda tan Punjab di gall na kare dove wakh wakh issue aa ,87% lok non sikh sn oh pakistan ja india naal hi raaji sn na k Punjab naal je Punjab naal raaji sn tan apni mava pahna ek karwa k lehnde ton haryane wal kyu bhajje
Both personalities are GREAT. THANKS for the knowledgeable points narrated nicely on partition of BHARATVARASH.
@HARJITSINGH-qo6pl Жыл бұрын
"Borders should be meaningless" as said by Dr Manmohan Singh PM is very much needed so to implement it, Amritsar Attary Border should be open for business for both side benefit. Good Discussion for peace🙏
@ManjeetSingh-rb2rm Жыл бұрын
Borders were closed by Imran Khan government after the removal of Article 370 by Indian government in August 2019. This was not closed by Indian government.
@honeysinghsidhu6479 Жыл бұрын
That’s true but Pakistan never agrees to trade with India 🇮🇳
Such an honest person, you are a gentleman. You spoke the truth. God bless you sir🎉
@gurbuxsingh7397 Жыл бұрын
Dr Ishtiaq Ahmad sahib is legend, he has complete knowledge about the partition of India. The Britishers brought Pakistan into being only due to the grief of leaving India.
@DrPrabhpreetSingh Жыл бұрын
Gall eh karo raaj di ki sabh to vadhia te peaceful secular economically stable strong raaj kihda c, oh c sikh raaj, ese layi asi oh sikh raaj khaalsa raaj chaunde aa jo maharaja ranjit singh ne karke vikhaya, koi historian gall ni kar reha ki panjabi soobe de hakka de vaydeyan da ki hoya? Panjab de hakk kyun khohe gye? Panjab de resources nu kyun luttya jaa reha? Unnatural way naal rajasthan nu paani de ke irrigation kyun promote kiti ja rahi panjab da pani khoh ke jad ki pani di lod sabh to vadh panjab te haryane nu hai te eh water levels rajasthan di lutt karan down ho rahe, pani ditte vi without royality ja rahe jad ki sanu kujh muft nhi dinda rajasthan marbel etc, fer gall karo injustice di, sikh katleaam di, guru ghara te hamle di, sadi hond nu khatam karan diya koshisha genocides, drug issue te 84 da justice? Fer dogle kanoon, sikh saza poorj kar ke vi riha nhi, ulta sikha nu baahrle mulka ch vi marwaya ja reha te bharat vich vi nsa laa ke dakke ja rahe jo peacefully dialogue karna chaunde....KHALISTAAN HI HALL🙏🏽🙏🏽
@ShivKumar-rc8lr Жыл бұрын
@@DrPrabhpreetSingh What u say about western Panjab ? Have u courage to speak against Pakistan?
@DrPrabhpreetSingh Жыл бұрын
@@ShivKumar-rc8lr we sacrificed our lives for this land, saved ur bodi janeu, ur women from markets of gazini, made this hindostaan free from britishers, have you guts to speak about 84, genocide, 1955 darbar sahb attack, 84 darbar sahb attack along with 57 other gurudwaras, to ask ur govt about lootings of panjab's recources, about justice of 84 and sentence to sajjan titler amitabh bachan, to stop drugs in panjab, to free sikh prisoners who have completed their sentences from past 26 years or so, to give equal rights, laws and freedom like hindu rasshtrawadi have, to punish baba bagheshwar under same act as of bhai amritpal singh. Uh morons we will make this land free firdt cz we sacrificed for this land, will think about pak panjab land or either we will remain a buffer state with open borders with them, uh imaginary goons terrorists of lindia will never speak the truth will never stand for justice, instead uh are treating us sikhs the victims as accused....shame on uh fake nationalist lindians....
@SatpalVerma000 Жыл бұрын
L*un babe da. India didn't exist before 1947. It was never partitioned but created
@SatpalVerma000 Жыл бұрын
India didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1860. Turkey didn't exist before 1921, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms. Turkey was created after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Dozens of countries were created based on nationalities after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1921. Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca. Italy was created in 1860 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian nationality. Similarly, Germany was created in 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of German nationality. Similarly, all European countries were created based on nationalities. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971. Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country Punjab should be a free country based on Punjabi nationality like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis and Muslims punjabi don't want to leave india and Pakistan, so we Punjabi Sikhs can't force them to follow us. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims. As simple as that. We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state but they don't support nation state unlike modern civilised world but a state based on religion. The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. We Sikhs have no problem living as minority in Punjabi nation state among majority Punjabi muslims and Punjabi Hindus, But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions. So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? We are open to change the name and keep it Punjab instead of Khalistan and also write the word secular state in constitution because it wouldn't change anything in practice. In practice it would still be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution..
No one pointed out the commitments of Nehru and Gandhi, they made with Sikh in 1932 in Gurdwaras of Delhi about their Sikh state
@SarnabhSinghMajoka5874 Жыл бұрын
Any historical documentary evidence...?
@DrPrabhpreetSingh Жыл бұрын
Yess absolutely, these lindians ll never talk about it....
@DrPrabhpreetSingh Жыл бұрын
Gall eh karo raaj di ki sabh to vadhia te peaceful secular economically stable strong raaj kihda c, oh c sikh raaj, ese layi asi oh sikh raaj khaalsa raaj chaunde aa jo maharaja ranjit singh ne karke vikhaya, koi historian gall ni kar reha ki panjabi soobe de hakka de vaydeyan da ki hoya? Panjab de hakk kyun khohe gye? Panjab de resources nu kyun luttya jaa reha? Unnatural way naal rajasthan nu paani de ke irrigation kyun promote kiti ja rahi panjab da pani khoh ke jad ki pani di lod sabh to vadh panjab te haryane nu hai te eh water levels rajasthan di lutt karan down ho rahe, pani ditte vi without royality ja rahe jad ki sanu kujh muft nhi dinda rajasthan marbel etc, fer gall karo injustice di, sikh katleaam di, guru ghara te hamle di, sadi hond nu khatam karan diya koshisha genocides, drug issue te 84 da justice? Fer dogle kanoon, sikh saza poorj kar ke vi riha nhi, ulta sikha nu baahrle mulka ch vi marwaya ja reha te bharat vich vi nsa laa ke dakke ja rahe jo peacefully dialogue karna chaunde....KHALISTAAN HI HALL🙏🏽🙏🏽
@Haryana-x8i4 ай бұрын
@@DrPrabhpreetSinghJe sikha di gll karda tan Punjab di gall na kare dove wakh wakh issue aa ,87% lok non sikh sn oh pakistan ja india naal hi raaji sn na k Punjab naal je Punjab naal raaji sn tan apni mava pahna ek karwa k lehnde ton haryane wal kyu bhajje
@giggatv4 ай бұрын
Bai eh glaa kafi loka de upd di lang janiya , eni di smjn shkti hai ni eni@@DrPrabhpreetSingh
Thanks veer gBhut kuj sikhan nu miliya ..kinni water consumption ho rhi hai and kinna water 💦 apne koll hai Punjab vich .. bhut sohna te knowledgeable interview and information. Thanks 🙏
To me, the first ever credible interview on this show... (rest all were good).
@gurmelsingh1040 Жыл бұрын
Quite productive discussion ove it enjoye through hearing must continue
@harpreetgill3836 Жыл бұрын
Beautiful analysis of partition and indopak history. Resolved so many misunderstandings 🙏🏼
@DrPrabhpreetSingh Жыл бұрын
Gall eh karo raaj di ki sabh to vadhia te peaceful secular economically stable strong raaj kihda c, oh c sikh raaj, ese layi asi oh sikh raaj khaalsa raaj chaunde aa jo maharaja ranjit singh ne karke vikhaya, koi historian gall ni kar reha ki panjabi soobe de hakka de vaydeyan da ki hoya? Panjab de hakk kyun khohe gye? Panjab de resources nu kyun luttya jaa reha? Unnatural way naal rajasthan nu paani de ke irrigation kyun promote kiti ja rahi panjab da pani khoh ke jad ki pani di lod sabh to vadh panjab te haryane nu hai te eh water levels rajasthan di lutt karan down ho rahe, pani ditte vi without royality ja rahe jad ki sanu kujh muft nhi dinda rajasthan marbel etc, fer gall karo injustice di, sikh katleaam di, guru ghara te hamle di, sadi hond nu khatam karan diya koshisha genocides, drug issue te 84 da justice? Fer dogle kanoon, sikh saza poorj kar ke vi riha nhi, ulta sikha nu baahrle mulka ch vi marwaya ja reha te bharat vich vi nsa laa ke dakke ja rahe jo peacefully dialogue karna chaunde....KHALISTAAN HI HALL🙏🏽🙏🏽
@jasha9sandhu Жыл бұрын
Respect Ishtiaq Ahmed sahb for exposing through his work the reality of Muslim league, Jinnah and also the fact that partition violence began with Massacre of sikhs & hindus in Rawalpindi, Poonch, Muzaffarabad & Hindus in Calcutta.
@SatpalVerma000 Жыл бұрын
India didn't exist before 1947. Italy didn't exist before 1860. Turkey didn't exist before 1921, Germany didn't exist before 1871, Saudi Arabia didn't exist before 1932 and so on. Concept of Countries was invented in Europe in the 18th century. Before the invention of the concept of countries, there were only empires and kingdoms. Turkey was created after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Dozens of countries were created based on nationalities after the fall of the Ottomans empire. Saudi Arabia was created in 1932 after the fall of Ottomans Empire in 1921. Saudi Arabia didn't exist When Prophet Muhammad was born in Mecca. Italy was created in 1860 by merging various small kingdoms of Italian nationality. Similarly, Germany was created in 1871 by merging various small kingdoms of German nationality. Similarly, all European countries were created based on nationalities. Now the question is what is nation and nationality? A nation is a society that shares a common language, culture, and history and has shared interests. For example English, German, Italian, Turkish, French, Russian, Dutch, Spanish, Arabs, Persian, Kurds, Japanese, Korean, Punjabi, kashmiri, Marathi, Bengali, Tamil, Malyalam, Thai etc are nations and a country based on single nation or nationality or where a single nationality dominates culturally, politically, in economy and military is called a nation state. Most countries in Europe or 'civilised world' are based on single nationalities and are nation states or simply called nations. There are dozens of nations within India and Pakistan. And hence India and Pakistan are union of nations or multinational countries. Nations are Punjab, Kashmir, sindh, Baluchistan, Gujarat, Bengal, Maharashtra, Tamilnadu etc. And in modern civilised world countries are created on basis of nationality like the countries in Europe (England, France, Germany, Poland, Norway, Sweden, Croatia etc) or in Asia (Korea, Japan, China,Thailand, Philippines etc) and Bangladesh etc are countries based on nationalities. Republic of India was created in 1947 out of the British Indian empire on the basis of two nations bogus theory. Two nations were assumed as Islam and hindusim. But in reality, Islam and Hinduism are not nations. India and Pakistan were not created based on nationalities but on two nation (Islam Hinduism) bogus theory. Hence, these countries are based on religions. On the other hand, Bangladesh is a nation state which was created on the basis of Bangla nationality in 1971. Three predominant civilisations in Republic of India, Indo Aryans, Dravidian and Sino Tibetic ( North East nations in the Republic of India) don't share anything although the first two civilisations share religion hence religion is the biggest binding force of the country followed by Military Power which is used to occupy non Hindu nations (Punjab, Kashmir, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya) with the country Punjab should be a free country based on Punjabi nationality like Bangladesh. But Hindu Punjabis and Muslims punjabi don't want to leave india and Pakistan, so we Punjabi Sikhs can't force them to follow us. Hindu Punjabis, who had deserted Punjabi language in 1951 and 1961 census by declaring Hindi as their mother tongue would never support a Punjabi nation state. They support a Indian state based on the Hindu religion. Similarly, Punjabi Muslims of Pakistan dont support Punjabi nation state either. They support Pakistan state that is based on Islam religion. Similarly, Bengali Hindus don't support Bangla nation state Bangladesh and want to live in India which is based on Hinduism. So Punjabi muslims, Punjabi Hindus, and Bengali Hindus are free to stay in their respective countries based on religions. But similar to Bangla Muslims of East Pakistan, who created Bangla nation state Bangladesh without Indian Bengali Hindus, Sikhs have the right to create Azad Punjab (a Punjabi nation state) without Punjabi Hindus and Punjabi Muslims. As simple as that. We Punjabi Sikhs have no problem living in a Punjabi Muslims or Punjabi Hindu majority Punjabi nation state but they don't support nation state unlike modern civilised world but a state based on religion. The Punjabi speaker population of Muslims is around 10 crore. Punjabi speaking population of Hindus is around 3 crore (Punjabi Hindus in Punjab, Himchal, Haryana, Jammu and Delhi). Punjabi speaker Sikh population is around 2 crore. Hence Sikhs would be minority if both Punjabi muslims and Hindus or either one of them come form a Punjabi nation state with us Sikhs. We Sikhs have no problem living as minority in Punjabi nation state among majority Punjabi muslims and Punjabi Hindus, But their radicals minds prefer religion over their nationality and they love to give up their Punjabi nationality and adopt Hindi and Urdu nationality in order to create a state based on their respective religions. So when Sikhs alone form a Punjabi nation state, it would automatically be a Sikh majority Punjabi nation state called Khalistan. What's in the name? We are open to change the name and keep it Punjab instead of Khalistan and also write the word secular state in constitution because it wouldn't change anything in practice. In practice it would still be Khalistan just like India is a Hindu rashtra in practice regardless of its official name or regardless of its constitution....
Historically, a nation where all were treated equal was the Raj of Maha Raja Ranjit Singh, the "Khalsa Raj"🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🦁🦁🦁🦁🦁
@sikhiverse Жыл бұрын
@@warringtribes6689 oho ess lai keyonki Thagg de mooh bhaag te juttiyaan chattan waaley hi saadi dhaah la gaye
@sikhiverse Жыл бұрын
@@warringtribes6689 aur mere bhai angrezon ke paaltu kuttey kaun the yaad hai naa
@sikhiverse Жыл бұрын
@@warringtribes6689 aur hamaare apne Bharat ke liye kitney pagdi waaley nichawar ho Gaye yaad hai naaa????
@sikhiverse Жыл бұрын
@@warringtribes6689 aur Jo aap 50 saal waaley raaj ki baat kar rahe hain..... mere bhai wo bhi ham sab ke liye hi thaa......
@sikhiverse Жыл бұрын
@@warringtribes6689 England Jaa ke badley kis ne laitey yaad hai naa veere .......... ehe samaa ehe ginon da ni ki kis time te kis ne ki keeta........ehe samaa hun ekk duje naaal khadan da hai........keyonke what goes around comes around........naal mil jul ke chalan vich hi saari communities di bhalaae hai.........pehlaan vi lok raaj kar gaye apne te ....... te hun apneyaan de mooh nu khoon lagaa hoyaaa.........Angrez chaley gaye par Gand bhar gaye ethe politics te communities ch........
@hfmleasing4445 ай бұрын
God bless Dr. Sahab. Very enlightened soul .
@rajwantvirk5182 Жыл бұрын
I noted a point in this discussion that the leaders felt that Hindu and Muslim have nothing in common therefor they can NOT LIVE TOGETHER and need separate countries. So separate countries were crafted and Muslim got their country. My question is that why more Muslim live in India then Pakistan. My point is that the notion that Muslim and Hindu can not live together was wrong. They have been living together for long time. It was just personal hate of big leaders with each other that created Pakistan. If India were left united, this county would have been a supper power by now which was not acceptable to British.
@krantsharma8455 Жыл бұрын
On the contrary, if Pakistan was still in India, we would have riots every 3rd day in the country, look at how minorities are treated now in India (not that Pakistan is any better), but given the current circumstances, Jinnah should be lauded as a genius
@charanpelia-hd7tv5 ай бұрын
Very true. Why more than 25 carors Muslims are in India and all Sikhs and Hindus are reduced to 2% from 20 % whereas Muslims population has increased drastically. Sardar Patel Very well said that if Muslims demanded separate country then why not every Muslim not moved to Pakistan. If someone says the then Sikh leaders were selfish. Can anyone grantee that the leaders who are demanding separate state are intellectual 🤔
@mohindersingh1435 Жыл бұрын
Appreciate very good analysis Really knowledgeable person
@tarvindersingh1072 Жыл бұрын
ਤਾਂ ਹੀ ਤਾਂ ਵਲਭ ਭਾਈ ਪਟੇਲ ਨੇ 1947 ਵਿੱਚ ਹੀ ਸਿੱਖ mujhedeen ਘੋਸ਼ਿਤ ਕਰ ਦਿੱਤਾ c Congress puri jimedar c
@truth76535 ай бұрын
Dr Ahmed a very learned man.
@PrabhsharandeepSingh-l2b Жыл бұрын
Dr Ishtiaq Ahmed said, “I would like somebody to go and show where my argument is flawed.” Yes, Dr Ahmed's argument is flawed on multiple levels. I would like to show that because I have also done archival research in this area. I would appreciate if Red FM Canada provides me the space to share my perspective. It would be nice to have that interview with Shameel.
@ajitpalsinghsarai1182 Жыл бұрын
Exactly. That's what I was thinking that it is flawed. He is so much pro- nehru and pro-congress. The way he said that states will get rights. So where are the rights now. Every state is struggling to survive its language and culture but centre govt is putting all their efforts in vain. Pakistan is such a small country in front of India that's why we are able to see the results sooner but within a decade we will see the same in India as it is leaping very fast towards it.
@ajitpalsinghsarai1182 Жыл бұрын
Both the nations were handed over to corrupt,pro-british and mean people. The rightful were either eliminated before independence or made powerless afterwards. India like Pakistan is becoming a religious intolerant country for no place for minorities at all.
Pakistani Highest educated man I have seen who has the history of India before and after the partition of India and you sir shared history on tv 100 percent right no manipulation thank you sir
Je sikha di gll karda tan Punjab di gall na kare dove wakh wakh issue aa ,87% lok non sikh sn oh pakistan ja india naal hi raaji sn na k Punjab naal je Punjab naal raaji sn tan apni mava pahna ek karwa k lehnde ton haryane wal kyu bhajje
@SamratKumar-ol1qjАй бұрын
Banda Singh Bahadure te 5 pyare vi hindu san jina ne amrit shakeya oh nai drama
@charanjivsingh4776 Жыл бұрын
Good information
@gurlalsingh254 Жыл бұрын
He missed one very important aspect in his conversation that the joint india will be centralized state or it would be federal structure. Mr Nehru &party said 'one nation but centralized on the other side jinnah said united but federalism. There disagreement was based on the state structure. Te je sikh state banoni c goriya ne oh majority bana sakde c land transfer or migration karake but nahi kiti ohna ne. Te most important, sikh ne kade ginti de adhaar te raaj nahi kita aavde jor nal kita te duniya da sab to vadia raaj kita te agge v eve hi hona. Waheguru 🙏
@honeysinghsidhu6479 Жыл бұрын
Acha ji je Sikhs ne jor de adhar te kitta ae ta phir Maratha,Rajputs,British sareya ne hi jor de adhar te kitta ae na ki ginti de adhaar te
@nsdhillon99375 ай бұрын
Pro Ishtiyak Ahmad sahib tuhanu 🎉🎉from Punjab India 🇮🇳
@karamjitsinghsalana4648 Жыл бұрын
Sikh Raj zindabad
@karama709 Жыл бұрын
Khalistan murdabad
@KaramSingh-v1o5 ай бұрын
Important information
@1B1000S Жыл бұрын
One of the best scholars of 1947 partition history. Hats off to Dr Ishtiaq for his astute analysis 🙏
@narindersharma83109 ай бұрын
Very nice explanation about partition sir, god give you long life
@narindersharma8310 Жыл бұрын
Very meaningful discussion
@harbilasnone5835 Жыл бұрын
fantastic knowledge
@joshjosh5553 Жыл бұрын
Very good interview. But there is no need to open borders. All sikh and hindus has already died. Only fe 100s are left. But millions of muslins will start coming and will form relationships here in india.
@Nareshsharma-xm5ro4 ай бұрын
Such an intelligent man.and described history so well.and a lesson to everyone
@pawankumarsharma6769 Жыл бұрын
आनंद आ गया, विश्लेषण सुनकर
@AmarjeetSingh-vi8sq Жыл бұрын
Hindu ko hindu rashtar chahiye doosron ko kyon nhi
@bhupindersinghrana9977 Жыл бұрын
Very well explained
@singhavtar00 Жыл бұрын
Great discussion! I can see lot of khalistani feeling the burn !!
@ksingh1560 Жыл бұрын
Yo take it easy they were sick n tired of being treated like 2nd hand Indian citizens we will see when people like you will feel the heat I remember what just recently in Haryana these bhagwas andhbhgts got there ass kicked n were begging sardars oh sorry your so called Khalistanis n were crying begging even the Jats too but no one came to there aid just wait change is coming soon
Waheguru ji ka khalsa Waheguru ji ki fateh Sikh Raj must come very soon
@jagjitsingh699 Жыл бұрын
ਸੱਚੀਆਂ ਗੱਲਾਂ ਕੀਤੀਆਂ ਬਹੁਤ ਵਧੀਆ
@gurvindersaund7466 Жыл бұрын
Muslim hindu Christian raj poor governance except Sikh raj.We all wish sikh raj to come back which was totally for the people of the people and by the people
@jagdishsingh23625 ай бұрын
Knowledgeful truthful analysis on partition of BHARATVARASH as Pakistan and Hindustan Bangladesh. by English empire. Narrated NICELY and clearly. THANKS to both of you very much.
A very rare living encycpedia of our time who knows everything in deep details of patition of India. Impartial and realistic hounour deserving professor Dr. Imtiaz Ahmed
@ajmerbhurj-km8qn Жыл бұрын
ਪਰ ਸਾਡੇ ਸਿੱਖ ਲੀਡਰ ਗਦਾਰ ਨਿਕਲਗੇ ਉਦੋ ਵਾਲੇ
@satyaviryadav10515 ай бұрын
Very good historical REVEALATIONS. Very authentically put forward by the Scholar. Let's hope we move forward to make this 31:00 reason now a safe and peaceful place❤
Je sikha di gll karda tan Punjab di gall na kare dove wakh wakh issue aa ,87% lok non sikh sn oh pakistan ja india naal hi raaji sn na k Punjab naal je Punjab naal raaji sn tan apni mava pahna ek karwa k lehnde ton haryane wal kyu bhajje
@nathuramkamboj6517 Жыл бұрын
Yur last wordare valuable and should be understanding.
Kehrian 80 percent ? 1857 ch kinne shaheed hoye? 1942 quit India movement ch kinne? Jallianwala bagh ch kinne?
@GurbahadursinghBhatti5 ай бұрын
Bilkul ji Big conspiracy by Hindu leaders eh banda Kora jhootha you are telling lie totallywrong
@RameshKumar-c6c7r5 ай бұрын
Bhai ik paase tu keh reya sikh gadhaara naal mill ke hindustan vich Punjab milla leya. Matlab je sikh bahadur v hun Te gadhaar v hun. O veer sadiya to raaj hindua da hi reya raaja paawe koi v hove slahkaar hindu hi rahe kyon ke padai lakhai hindu hi karde baaki ta Bus dharm de pichhe Pagal aa.. Jo padde ga o hi asli raaj karega anpadd sirf LA LA kar sakde. Nehru paddeya likheya c iss lai oss nu patta c Punjab nu kiwe hindustan vich shamil karna. Te dooje paase anpadd leader. A saara khel education da hai veer. 1lakh angrej 40 crore Hindustaniya Te raaj kar gye 200 saal sirf education karke. Te Punjab Te v kitta 100 saal .sikh bahadur ta c par anpadd v c iss karke gulaam ho gye angreja de Ki sirf maharaja ranjit singh hi dimaag wala Te bahadur c oss de baad sikh kyon nahi sambhaal sake raaj. Kyon ke educated angreja nai apne dimaag naal kaboo kitta sikhraaj nu jiwe sher jinaa marji dalair hove kaboo ta insaan hi karda oss nu aapne dimaag naal. Hoon veer bahaduri de naal dimaag v istmaal karna painda raaj karn lai bahaduri ta lai aaoge par padde likhe dimaag kitho liyaoge... Iss lai poori duniya te raaj cristion jhoodi ja hindu hi karnge just because of education
@rangkarmitv24 Жыл бұрын
ਬਹੁਤ ਬਹੁਤ ਵਧੀਆ ਜੀ
@NikitaSissy Жыл бұрын
Jinnah nu Jinnah “saab” and Nehru nu koi ijjat ni, wah ji wah !!
@r.k3261 Жыл бұрын
Fer ki hoya
@gurjeetsingh-gd1wr Жыл бұрын
14:00 qatliam kio hoia
@KulwinderSingh-uz7fl Жыл бұрын
If sikh khoum is still strong we will get khalistan
@tamashbeen6610 Жыл бұрын
In Brampton?
@jetank2016 Жыл бұрын
Kithe?
@luckydhillon1584 Жыл бұрын
gurudare de pradhaan da munda truck chori karda fadiya giya kal
@jetank2016 Жыл бұрын
@@luckydhillon1584 Hahahaah. Meinu Khalistanis de confidence te hassa bada aunda. Ehe saley Punjab di ground reality jmA ni jan de?