Resolving the Mystery of Islam - S.I.N. VS Historical Evidence - Brother Mel - Episode 5

Brother Mel and Al Fadi have been reviewing the false recordings of the Standard Islamic Narrative given regarding the Apostate Battles. Why would the S.I.N. intentionally do this? Was there political motivation? Faulty data has been used for decades, and Brother Mel wonders if Islamic historians will be willing to go back and correct these obvious mistakes - but this would mean acknowledging inaccuracies within the Standard Islamic Narrative. Watch and Al Fadi and Brother Mel conclude the series and its damning evidence.
Origins of Islam: / originsofislam
Join this channel to get access to perks and early premieres of videos:
/ @cirainternational
Follow CIRA International ®
Facebook: / cirainternational
Website: www.cirainterna...
Support Al Fadi:
Patreon: / cirainternational
Website: cirainternatio...
About CIRA International ®
CIRA's mission and goal is to; create awareness about Islam as a religion and political movement; inform and challenge the Church concerning outreach and evangelism to Muslims, equip the believers with effective outreach tools, and advance the Gospel message among our Muslim neighbors & communities so that the vast majority of Muslims will begin a Gospel conversation with a Christ-follower.
CIRA exists to mobilize the Body of Christ across North America, and globally, to more effectively reach Muslims with the Gospel, by discipling and equipping believers, and by empowering church and community leaders to influence the Muslim world for Christ.
#AlFadi #BrotherMel #Islam #Mecca #originsofislam #SIN #standardislamicnarrative #muhammad #quran #koran

[@danieladedosugbadero7373]

The unwrapping of Islamic lies in the SIN has only just begun.

[@georgeo785]

Yes

[@nunya54]

After only 1400 years . . . .ok.

[@rockzalt]

The Chinese have no skin in the game, no reason to distort the record. There's no motive for them to do that. Mel's right, it's man made power politics at its' best.

[@georgeo785]

They want to be the number one world power. It's their entire body that's in. ccp the dragon the devil in communism

[@alhamdouyasu]

what a great service to humanity. Keep it up sir Al Fadi/ CIRA!👍🙏

[@lombadariwaller]

If there was a historical prophet why is he not named by these writers?

[@tc7500]

Without Lies Islam Dies!

[@generaljg4373]

Without lies christianity disappears

[@georgeo785]

​@@generaljg4373 the troll is alive and well. See you on judgement day you are in for a big surprise. All this trolling nonsense. The truth really hurts

[@generaljg4373]

​@@georgeo785theres no judge in Cristianity the judge died on the cross

[@georgeo785]

The truth is killing islam

[@georgeo785]

@@generaljg4373 Actually He will be the judge. All judgement is given to Him by God. Of course you wouldn't know this because your in a cult that follows the devil. Every knee shall bow and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord to the Glory of Almighty God. You can bet on it. See you there

[@alexandernorman5337]

The Persians are probably more accurate/reliable. They were writing their records at the time - we know this. The Muslims likely compiled their history many decades later (after they've finished developing their religion) and made mistakes because memory isn't perfect.

[@georgeo785]

Man made cult is what it is

[@eswn1816]

Yes... "Developing their religion" = Inventing it!

[@ailove313]

Glory be to God Jesus Christ

[@preapple]

Excellent research on the Arab migration and rebellion beginning in 618. Also that credit was transferred from tayyee to the quresh tribe for political expediency. Please create a PowerPoint with bullet points summary of all the contradictions you have discovered. Thanks

[@temporaryaccount5307]

11:11 that sure is a lot of battles and in the same year! Islam: the religion of piece.

[@georgeo785]

Religion of the devil, a man made cult

[@georgeo785]

Actually it's a man made cult

[@shampar10]

This is great content sir!

[@MU-we8hz]

AlhamduJesus i left this cult. AlhamduJesus

[@kilianklaiber6367]

Wonderful calm and clear presentation and discussion. If the dating is completely wrong, well then we have lots of work in front of us. I remember that the Quran talks about the year of the elefant, when mohammed was born. Maybe, we can find out what this is truly referring to by readjusting the dating according to Mel's research?

[@kilianklaiber6367]

"Abraha, the Abyssinian, Christian ruler of Aksum marched upon the Ka‘bah in Mecca with a large army, which included war elephants, intending to demolish it. However, the lead elephant, known as 'Mahmud' (Arabic: مَـحْـمُـوْد, consonant letters: m-ħ-m-w-d),[2] is said to have stopped at the boundary around Mecca, and refused to enter. It has been mentioned in the Quran that the army was destroyed by small birds that carried pebbles that destroyed the entire army and Abraha perished." This is obviously B.S. because elephants need lots and lots of water and food to survive, which didn't exist in and around Mecca. A large army cannot be marched through the desert in ancient times, because it would have died of thirst and starved very fast. But, something similar may have occured at a different place, not Mecca but?? The small birds throwing pebbles may refer to some kind of ancient artillery or sling shots used for defeating an army. A solution may be found by shifting the dates according to Mel's finding.

[@IslamicOrigins]

Thank you, Killian!

[@kilianklaiber6367]

@@defenderoftruth3212 No, we are actually trying to establish the correct dates because your dates are obviously wrong! ;-)

[@MilitantAntiAtheism]

@@defenderoftruth3212 *Sahih al-Bukhari 4919* alLah has a shin which he will show to identify himself to muslims. But he is not a physical being.

[@ethercruiser1537]

Very interesting! So why was the Standard Islamic Narrative off by a consistent 4 years? Was it over the rights of the inheritance of power in Islam? (One tribe rather than another???).

[@generaljg4373]

Help I cant find the trinity in my bible, which one of the 100 different bibles i can find the trinity in it?

[@georgeo785]

​@@generaljg4373 that because your not smart enough to find it.Its a Spiritual Book and your a lost carnal person that is provoking God's anger. Typical of a cult devil follower

[@ethercruiser1537]

@@generaljg4373 We gave you the references MULTIPLE TIMES that there is ONE GOD but He revealed Himself as God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. STOP TROLLING!!!

[@georgeo785]

​@@ethercruiser1537 these clowns can't handle the truth it's why they troll. They follow a cult that's of the devil and that's all they need to know

[@carefir]

​@@generaljg4373 Your Bible is defective. Does it say "Quran" on the cover? If so please return it for a refund. It is a most corrupted book.

[@billshepherd5090]

Very well presented Al and Mel

[@MisterHowzat]

"Al"?!? His name is not "Al" The Arabic word transliterated "al" is akin to the English article "the". It is not the English name "Al" like Al Gore.

[@PeterHarremoes]

I heard one theory that the Arabs changed the calender around 100 AH from being based on the sun to be based on the moon. If the later authors did not take this into account it would explain the 4 years shift around the time of Muhammad.

[@P.H.888]

Nice try 😂

[@felipemillomeda]

Always grateful to you brother al fadi for this life changing work ..my support to you. God bless you always in Jesus Christ's name.. Amen

[@tc7500]

Great 👍 video!

[@IslamicOrigins]

I wonder will a single muslim watching agree that the Hijra year is wrong? I consider this a simple test of honesty and integrity. It is abundantly clear that the year of the Arabs began in 617 but later got changed to 622.

[@_John_P]

(05:00) Heraclius ascended on 5th October 610AD, the 7th year would then be between 5th October 616AD and 5th October 617AD, thus 618 AD would be the 8th year. The rebellion must have started during the 7th year and extended into the 8th year.

[@tarnos4153]

Who were in power at that time may explain the “mystery”.

[@mysteriesmadeknown2874]

John 3:34 For He whom God has sent utters the words of God, for He gives the Spirit without measure. John 14:16 “And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, to be with you forever." :17 “Even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him. You know Him, for He lives with you and will be in you. ”Romans 5:5 And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.

[@queenesther8505]

WITHOUT LIES AND ⚔️🗡️ ISLAM IS DEAD

[@tc7500]

Simple, the Abbasids reconstructed the SIN over 100 years later so that could be a reason why the 4 years difference.

[@generaljg4373]

Muslims and Jews believe in one God but I don't know who that guy on the cross we don't know him

[@georgeo785]

​@@generaljg4373 well they will find out soon. New Testament Scriptures says Jesus Christ is coming soon to destroy the enemies of Israel at the battle of Armageddon. Half the world knows this. The Jews will look upon Him whom they have pierced. Happy trolling. I love the truth.

[@georgeo785]

@@gospelofyashua not if their a troll. In a cult that follows the devil. I am warning him that God will judge his every word. Maybe he will get the point. Is a lost person intelligent

[@mysteriesmadeknown2874]

John 3:34 For He whom God has sent utters the words of God, for He gives the Spirit without measure. John 14:16 “And I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Helper, to be with you forever." :17 “Even the Spirit of truth, whom the world cannot receive, because it neither sees Him nor knows Him. You know Him, for He lives with you and will be in you. ”Romans 5:5 And hope does not put us to shame, because God’s love has been poured into our hearts through the Holy Spirit who has been given to us.

[@gospelofyashua]

...unless they have something monumental to damage the S.I.N. coming up, then it dont make sense to ponder on a few years. I can see if its 10 or more years, but 4 years isnt much, In my opinion.

[@starshipchris4518]

In which books could one find those Chinese sources? Hoyland's Seeing Islam or something else? Great presentation!

[@Patrick_Cooper]

The intro music always makes me want to dance. Which has to look funny since I am sitting down.

[@toluwatobi46]

Yes great as usual

[@maxschon7709]

The question will be when the Umayyads appeared in the roman records. Does that goes along with the Narrative?

[@mashruralam5795]

When these historical documents say “year” do they mean solar or lunar year? For example if a text claim this is the 100 year anniversary is it 100 solar or lunar or some other year?

[@royalisy550]

From the Wikipedia page about the Abbasid Caliphate: "The Abbasid Caliphate[pron 1] was the third caliphate to succeed the Islamic prophet Muhammad. It was founded by a dynasty descended from Muhammad's uncle, Abbas ibn Abd al-Muttalib (566-653 CE), from whom the dynasty takes its name.[6] They ruled as caliphs for most of the caliphate from their capital in Baghdad in modern-day Iraq, after having overthrown the Umayyad Caliphate in the Abbasid Revolution of 750 CE (132 AH)." If we assume a solar calendar was in use for counting years up until the Abbasid Revolution: 750 - 132 = 618; the year of the arabs (+/- a few months).

[@georgeo785]

I wouldn't trust wikipedia to tell me if the sun is shining or if it's raining

[@salancy3279]

💐❤️✝️💐❤️🙏👍👍

[@eliesakroudi5783]

does Mel have KZbin site or Channel thank you ?

[@R-rr1]

Yes

[@sheikhboyardee556]

Origins.

[@generaljg4373]

​@@sheikhboyardee556you worship three gods right?

[@jonhilderbrand4615]

@@generaljg4373 Hello there, general. So far, I count four comments you have made, none of which addresses the actual subject matter covered by the video. Why is that?

[@georgeo785]

​@@generaljg4373 if the truth didn't hurt and you know these guys are telling the truth you wouldn't be playing the fool. Mr. Troll we can count on you for laughs. Continuous stupidity and hatred is of the devil and your cult

[@miguelsureda9762]

And....the battles were all in iraq...No Mecca in the Hejaz in sight

[@veronicaredeemed]

Does this dating difference take into account that the lunar year is shorter than ours?

[@saidmohammed7597]

In hundred years 100 years moon calendar is 103 years sun calendar and that is in Quran.

[@P.H.888]

Don’t be silly, as if any ancient people were that off!? They followed the seasons and had different ways of making their particular calendars fit additional days or months.

[@Stardust475]

Umar changed calender to a lunar calendar during his csliphate. In SIN Muhammad's time they followed a luni/solar calendar.

[@waterzen1]

👍

[@M_A_R_I_A_M399_5]

Aren't you a Christian minister? Why are you obsessed with Islam? It seems you have nothing to say about Christianity

[@guardianangels111]

Coz it is run by the devil and Jesus told us to fight the devil

[@kingofthejungle2894]

VIDEO SUGGESTION: What do you say to this man‘s statements (link below) about leaving Christianity? I would be interested in your point of view. I think this man makes some valid points. For example when he talks about Jesus making wrong predictions, but I remember Muhammed was mocked in your videos for making the very same wrong prediction (for example about the world coming to an end soon, yet 2000 years later, here we are). I am far from finishing the bible and haven’t read the Gospels yet, so I dont know how / whether it’s true that Jesus predictions was wrong, but if it‘s true that Jesus was wrong, how can we trust him? I am genuinely asking :/ Could you analyze or make a reaction video to the men‘s statements and the comment section of the video? Thank you for reading my comment. (Sorry if my English has errors, it‘s not my native tongue) For some reason the video of this link starts in the middle, but you can rewind to the beginning: m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/Zqu9hnidqad6oLs

[@kingofthejungle2894]

By the way I am neither Christian, nor Muslim. I am currently trying to learn, but I feel like the more I learn, the more confused I become. Nonetheless your videos are very helpful and valuable. Thank you

[@mysteriesmadeknown2874]

Almost all Jesus perdition came true, except for the ones that are yet to come.

[@mysteriesmadeknown2874]

​@King of the Jungle, whatever you are confused about, please let me know?

[@kingofthejungle2894]

Thank you for your comment. I am confused about all the contradictions. I was raised Muslim, but after reading the Quran, I could not believe, this was the word of God. Especially the violent passages. Yet Muslims claim, Islam is a peacful religion and Muhammed is an Example to be followed. But to be honest, if I had a son, I wouldn‘t want him to follow Muhammeds example. How can perceptions be so radically different? I feel like we are not talking about the same man. Now I am learning about other religions, but after feeling so misguided by my former religion, I am careful not to jump into conclusions. Jesus message is like the opposite of Muhammeds message, which made me want to learn more about him. At the same time people are leaving Christianity (some even convert to Islam) and give valid reasons. Have you watched the video I posted in my comment (about the man, who left Christianity)?

[@kingofthejungle2894]

@mysteriesmadeknown287 By the way, you have said „almost all of Jesus predictions came true, exept the ones that are yet to come“ If the man in the video is saying the truth, then your statement is not correct. The example I gave in my first comment would be a wrong prediction by Jesus

[@ipadproo7318]

ريسيرش 😂😂😂

[@generaljg4373]

I was a Muslim before watching Christians preaching about christianity and the trinity so now they just made my belief in Islam become stronger after talking about the confusing trinity

[@georgeo785]

You don't have a choice. If you had a choice then the truth wouldn't make you troll like you do. So sad. The devil is deceiving millions and millions of people. That's why there is so many man made cult. Al Fadi is try to help those that want help to beat the devil

[@UnionSince452]

You not understanding it is different to it being ‘confusing’. Its actually quite simple

[@i.blazeeweka7461]

Spiritually blind or willfully ignorant Even a witch with enough power can be in Ten places at once What do you think the Almighty can do then?

[@miguelsureda9762]

Why are you not answering the claims of this vid? Why escaping? Why using childish lies ! Why can you not stick to the subect ? What are you afraid of? To be forced to start to think on your own ?

[@P.H.888]

The Godhead is 3 Eternal Spiritual beings that are in total unity. Elohim = plural Adonai = plural Echad = Hebrew 1 ~ Adam & Eve are 1 = Echad obviously 2 distinct persons. YHVH appeared to Father Abraham in Genesis 18 ~ How did HE appear? As 3 Men. Genesis 19 YHVH ~ 2 of them. YHVH says HE is 1 & 3 Persons

[@alonzoharris9049]

Fadi believes in three gods.

[@rainbowdash2366]

Your prophet believed in 4 gods and so do you. Lah, Lat, Uzza and Manat Qurap 53:19-20 🤣🤣🤣

[@rainbowdash2366]

Who is Isa's earthly father Nadir Ibn Muta?

[@TheFrancis2003]

Father son and holy spirit are all one

[@georgeo785]

Troll alert hold your nose

[@georgeo785]

​@@TheFrancis2003 3 in on called the Godhead in scriptures. Jesus Christ is fullness of the Godhead in bodily form. The reason most people don't know this is because the Scriptures are Spiritual and it takes a Spiritual person to comprehend

[@cascarrabias397]

Mel, this is what I get so far. Chinese sources: Da- Shi located in the west of Bo-Si (Persia). During the year of Da-ye (605 AD ~ 618 AD) of Sui- Dynasty, there was a Persian man herding camels in the hills of Cu fen Mo DiNa (Kufa?). One day, a lion-man (Zurvan) appeared out of nowhere telling him: "There are three caves in the hills of the west. A large amount of weapons is stored inside the caves and you can go and retrieve them there. There is also a black stone with white inscriptions in the cave, and if you read them, you will become a king." Men then followed the lion. The man’s words and did find a large amount of long blades and the black stone with white writings teaching him how to rebel. So then they gathered together and crossed the River Seng-Ge (Euphrates?), and plundered the merchants, and Their multitude became more and more prosperous. Bo- Si (Persia) and Fulong (Byzantine) sent troops to fight against them, bat they were all defeated. n the second year of the Yonghui of the Tang era (651) they sent envoys to us. Ling is from Da- Shi lineage, his title is Don-Mi-Mo-Mo-Ni(Amir al muminin). Rashidum. If Abu Bakr was a person: Abu Bakr from 632/634 and Hormizad VI from 630 to 632 If Abu Bakr was a place: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diyar_Bakr Umar Ibn al Khattab, could have been Farooq Hormizad. Uthman was from 644 to 656 and Farouksad was the ruler from 651 to 665 The Sunnies = Parthians Shi’a = Sassanids Tired of wars that never ended with the Byzantines, in the year 628, Farooq Hormizad open resistance to Koshrow ambitions to prolong the war with the Byzantines, his own son imprisoned him, Kavad(was seven years old) with the help of the Parthian mobility. Followed a total political chaos after Koshrow was killed. The Parthians did not accepted the authority from this seven year old kid and proposed the daughter of Koshrow, Boran in the year 630. 630 Shakhtarvaras and his army captured Ctesiphon with the help of the betrayal of Pyruz who helped open the city gates. Ardashir III(the kid) was killed along with the Viziers and all elites. Shakhtarvaras reighned only 40 days, Farooq Hormizad former collaborator and overthrowing Khosrow dissatisfied with the power not being transferred to Buran, killed Shakhtarvaras. Farrok was the fact ruler under Buran administration, So, Farroq was Umar, in Islamic tradition would be Farooq Hormizad., a derivation of the Parthian Farooq in shacnna me account, Boron was the deposed by the son of Shahvaraz, Shapur. This Shapur in a sequence will be deposed by nobility in his cousin Azarmidokht another daughter of Khosrow will reign. Farooq Hormizad will tray to marry Azarmidokht in order to fully transfer power to his hands, after the refusal Farooq declares himself to be the ruler of Iran, but with the help of Parthian noble men Sihavash from the house of Mehjar who assassinate Farooq Hormizad, Farooq Hormizad avoids to be the wife of the conspirator of her own’s father murder. Later on one of the sons of Farooq Hormizad, Rostam allegedly will a venue father’s death and strangle Azarmidokht in her palace. The the crown will pas to Hormizad VI, Farooq Hormizad belong to the Pahlavi faction namely to the house of Ispudan, from here we can speculate that one of the viziers or Uruzgan is it in Parthian, very popular Parthian. This vizier of Parsikh faction namely Pyrus Hozrow may have involved in the murder of Farooq, that would be like in a Muslim tradition where the one responsible for Umar death was Pyruz. Hormizad VI, He was proclaimed to be the Sha by Persian troops and nisibins, presumably he was the ruler of Nisibin, although many major historians of this era identify this figure with the Farooq, there may have two different individuals. If we consider Abu Bakr to be a title and not a name it would make a lot of sense most part of the Bakarebean virile times were located in the upper Mesopotamia. Not only that but also date the reigns of almost corresponds Abu Bakr from 632/634 and Hormizad VI from 630 to 632. After Hormizad VI the reign passed to Yazdegerd III, could he be the Islamic Yazid? Perpretrator of the prophets grandson Hussein, there are no coins of Yazid Ibn Muawiyya but a lot confirming Yazdegerd III. Yazdegerd III ascended to the throne at the age of 8, in such paranormality in the ages and sexes of the ruler of that crucial moment for the assassinates can be explained by the fact that the house of Sassan was already on the second position by that time. The early age of Yazdegerd III in this case was simply a convenient way for the Parthians to rule the southern lands of Iranshar with the help of their viziers. The commander in chief of the Arab ar mies and Fars no other than Abdullah Ibn Amir, one of the garners of the caliph Uthman.

[@P.H.888]

👺666 too late!

[@louiesafi3116]

EARLY Church Fathers - Confirm NT Authors Matthew, Mark, Luke & John ▪︎ Matthew - A tax collector who became Jesus' apostle and wrote about the life of Jesus as the Messiah for the Jewish community c. 60 AD. ▪︎ Mark - A Jew, and a companion of Peter and Paul, who wrote for both Jews and Gentiles about Christ's death and resurrection c. 65 AD. ▪︎ Luke - A Gentile doctor, and a companion of Peter and Paul who wrote for the Gentiles about Christ the saviour for humankind. ▪︎ Luke - also wrote the Acts of the Apostles c. 65 AD. ▪︎ John - The 'beloved' apostle of Jesus, wrote in his later years about the Word who took on Flesh (John 1:1,14) c. 80-90 AD. ▪︎ John - also wrote 3 Letters and The Book of Revelations c. 80-90 AD. ▪︎ James - Jesus' half brother, wrote 1 letter c. 35 AD. ▪︎ Paul - wrote 13 letters c.50 - 67 AD. ▪︎ Jude - wrote 1 letter c. 65 AD. ▪︎ Peter - wrote 2 letters c. 67 AD. ▪︎ The author of The Letter to Hebrews is unknown c. 65 AD. (Wikipedia). ▪︎ Jesus Christ's' ministry occurred between 27-30 A.D. ▪︎ Christianity began after the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ when thousands of Jews became followers of 'The Way' (Jesus). ▪︎ The New Testament scholar, F.F. Bruce, gives strong historical evidence that the New Testament was completed by A.D. 100. ▪︎ Most writings of the New Testament were completed twenty to forty years before 100 AD. (Wikipedia). ▪︎ The apostles and their companions wrote the New Testament from their first-hand experiences with Jesus. New Testament integrity is supported by historians, biblical and textual scholars, along with thousands of early codices, manuscripts and the Dead Sea Scrolls, proving the validity and preservation of the Gospels written between c. 35-90 A.D (Eusebius, Church History 111. 39 .15; Irenaeus Against Heresies, 111.1) ▪︎ Eusebius & The Testimony of Clement: ▪︎ Eusebius, writing at the end of the third century specifically credits the four Gospels to the four writers, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John . ▪︎ Eusebius didn't make the connection himself but quoted from earlier works such as Clement of Alexandria. ▪︎ Clement of Alexandria lived 100 years before Eusebius and held that Mark wrote his Gospel, taken from the teaching of Peter. He also notes that this Mark is the one Peter mentions in 1 Peter 5:15 (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 2.15.1-2).1. He later states that Mark's writing of the Gospel happened while Peter was still alive (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 6.16.6).2 The Testimony of Papias: ▪︎ While Clement's writings bring us to within a century of the Gospels' composition, Eusebius quotes and even earlier source, the writer Papias. Richard Bauckham notes that Papias' writings, while composed probably around 110AD are reflections from his earlier investigations as he collected oral reports from disciples who sat under either the apostles' direct disciples or the apostles themselves. Bauckham notes "the period of which he is speaking must be around 80CE."3 According to Craig Blomberg, Papias states Mark, who served as Peter's interpreter, "wrote accurately all that he remembered, not indeed, in order, of the things said and done by the Lord."4 ▪︎ Similarly, we have early support for the other authors as well. Blomberg notes that Papias tells us that Matthew wrote his gospel "alleging that he originally wrote the ‘sayings' of Jesus in the Hebrew dialect" 5 Irenaeus, who lived just after Papias confirms that Matthew wrote his gospel and did so early: "Matthew also issued a written Gospel among the Hebrews in their own dialect, while Peter and Paul were preaching at Rome, and laying the foundations of the Church" (Against Heresies 3.1.1). ▪︎ Clement of Alexandria, in the same Eusebius passage where he confirms Mark authorship also confirms Luke and John's authorship of their gospels. There is a strong chain of testimony linking Matthew, Mark, Luke and John as the men to the Gospel accounts. References: 1. See this passage in the Christian Classics Ethereal Library digital version of the Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers at www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.vii.xvi.html. 2. Christian Classics Ethereal Library, www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/npnf201.iii.xi.xiv.html. 3. Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Pub., 2006. Print. 14. 4. Blomberg, Craig. The Historical Reliability of the Gospels. Second ed. Leicester, England: Inter-Varsity, 2007. Print. 25. 5. Blomberg, 26. THE Early Church Fathers Confirm The Gospel Authors: ▪︎ Justin Martyr, who was writing from Rome in around 150 AD.“In the memoirs [=Gospels], which I say have been composed by the apostles and those who followed them”… (Dialogue with Trypho, 103.8.) ▪︎ Irenaeus of Lyon, which is in modern-day France. Around 180 AD, Irenaeus wrote: "Then [after the publication of the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke] John, the disciple of the Lord, who had even rested on his breast, himself also gave forth the Gospel, while he was living at Ephesus in Asia” (Cited in Eusebius, Church History 5:8, compare Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.1.1.) ▪︎ Irenaeus writes: “I can even describe the place where the blessed Polycarp used to sit and discourse - his going out, too, and his coming in - his general mode of life and personal appearance, together with the discourses which he delivered to the people; also how he would speak of his familiar intercourse with John, and with the rest of those who had seen the Lord; and how he would call their words to remembrance” (Fragments from the Lost Writings of Irenaeus, Chapter 2) ▪︎ The Muratorian Fragment lists 22 of the 27 books that were later included in the New Testament. It’s dated to around 180 AD. Here’s what it says about John’s Gospel: “The fourth of the Gospels is that of John, [one] of the disciples. To his fellow disciples and bishops, who had been urging him [to write], he said, “Fast with me today for three days, and what will be revealed to each one let us tell it to one another.” On the same night, it was revealed to Andrew, [one] of the apostles, that John should write down all things in his own name while all of them should review it” (Muratorian Canon of Rome, nos. 9-16) ▪︎ Clement of Alexandria, who was also writing around 180 AD. Regarding John’s Gospel, Clement says: “Of all those who had been with the Lord only Matthew and John left us their recollections (hypomnēmata), and tradition says that they took to writing perforce…. John, it is said, used all the time a message which was not written down, and at last took to writing for the following cause. The three gospels which had been written down before were distributed to all including himself; it is said he welcomed them and testified to their truth but said that there was only lacking to the narrative the account of what was done by Christ at first and at the beginning of the preaching…. They say accordingly that John was asked to relate in his own gospel the period passed over in silence by the former evangelists” (Cited in Eusebius, Church History, 3.24.1-13) ▪︎ So Clement tells us that John specifically went out of his way to give us information that was not already adequately told Synoptics. ▪︎ Tertullian of Carthage, which is in modern-day Tunisia, who was writing around 207 AD. Tertullian wrote: “We lay it down as our first position, that the evangelical Testament has apostles for its authors…. Of the apostles, therefore, John and Matthew first instill faith into us; whilst of apostolic men, Luke and Mark renew it afterwards” (Against Marcion 4.2) ▪︎ According to the majority viewpoint, the gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, collectively referred to as the Synoptic Gospels, are the primary sources of historical information about Jesus and of the religious movement he founded.[19][20][21] The fourth gospel, the Gospel of John, differs greatly from the first three gospels. Historians often study the historical reliability of the Acts of the Apostles when studying the reliability of the gospels, as Acts was seemingly written by the same author as the Gospel of Luke. ▪︎ Among scholars, a growing majority considers the Gospels to be in the genre of Ancient Greco-Roman biographies,[22][23] the same genre as Plutarch’s Life of Alexander and Life of Caesar. Typically, ancient biographies written shortly after the death of the subject include substantial history.[22] Some biblical scholars view Luke’s Gospel as ancient history rather than ancient biography.[23] References: 19 a b c Sanders, E. P. (1993). The Historical Figure of Jesus. Penguin. ISBN 978-0-14-192822-7. Archived from the original on 2017-04-18. Retrieved 2017-08-29. 20 "The Synoptic Gospels, then, are the primary sources for knowledge of the historical Jesus" "Jesus Christ." Encyclopædia Britannica. 2010. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 27 November 2010 [1] Archived 2015-05-03 at the Wayback Machine. 21 Vermes, Geza. The authentic gospel of Jesus. London, Penguin Books. 2004. 22 a b Keener, Craig S. "Otho: A Targeted Comparison of Suetonius's Biography and Tacitus's History, with Implications for the Gospels' Historical Reliability." Bulletin for Biblical Research (2011): 331-355. Penn State University Press. See Abstract. www.jstor.org/stable/26424373?seq=1 23 a b Licona, Michael R. Why Are There Differences in the Gospels?: What We Can Learn from Ancient Biography. Oxford University Press, 2016. p.3 Amen.. Hallelujah...

[@HilaryB.]

Wow! Thanks very much for your effort typing that, I appreciate it. One small thing, you may find it's 1 Peter 5:13, not 5:15.

[@louiesafi3116]

@@HilaryB. Yes, thank you..

[@louiesafi3116]

The NT GOSPELS - Evidence of Author's & Dates Written ▪︎ Matthew - A tax collector who became Jesus' apostle and wrote about the life of Jesus as the Messiah for the Jewish community c. 60 AD. ▪︎ Mark - A Jew, and a companion of Peter and Paul, who wrote for both Jews and Gentiles about Christ's death and resurrection c. 60 AD. ▪︎ Luke - A Gentile doctor, and a companion of Peter and Paul who wrote for the Gentiles about Christ the saviour for humankind. c. 60 AD ▪︎ Luke - also wrote the Acts of the Apostles c. 60 AD. ▪︎ John - The 'beloved' apostle of Jesus, wrote in his later years about the Word who took on Flesh (John 1:1,14) c. 80-90 AD. ▪︎ John - also wrote 3 Letters and The Book of Revelations c. 80-90 AD. ▪︎ James - Jesus' cousin, wrote 1 letter c. 35 AD. ▪︎ Paul - wrote 13 letters c.49 - 65 AD. ▪︎ Jude - wrote 1 letter c. 65 AD. ▪︎ Peter - wrote 2 letters c. 67 AD. ▪︎ The author of The Letter to Hebrews is unknown c. 65 AD. (Wikipedia). ▪︎ Jesus Christ's' ministry occurred between 27-30 A.D. ▪︎ Christianity began after the Crucifixion and Resurrection of Jesus Christ when thousands of Jews became followers of 'The Way' (Jesus). ▪︎ The New Testament scholar, F.F. Bruce, gives strong historical evidence that the New Testament was completed by A.D. 100. ▪︎ Most writings of the New Testament were completed twenty to forty years before 100 AD. (Wikipedia). ▪︎ The apostles and their companions wrote the New Testament from their first-hand experiences with Jesus. New Testament integrity is supported by historians, biblical and textual scholars, along with thousands of early codices, manuscripts and the Dead Sea Scrolls, proving the validity and preservation of the Gospels written between c. 35-90 A.D (Eusebius, Church History 111. 39 .15; Irenaeus Against Heresies, 111.1) INTERNAL Evidence: ▪︎ The internal evidence supports these early dates for several reasons. The first three Gospels prophesied the fall of the Jerusalem Temple which occurred in A.D. 70. However, the fulfillment is not mentioned. It is strange that these three Gospels predict this major event but do not record it happening. Why do they not mention such an important prophetic milestone? The most plausible explanation is that it had not yet occurred at the time Matthew, Mark, and Luke were written. ▪︎ In the book of Acts, the Temple plays a central role in the nation of Israel. Luke writes as if the Temple is an important part of Jewish life. He also ends Acts on a strange note: Paul living under house arrest. It is strange that Luke does not record the death of his two chief characters, Peter and Paul. The most plausible reason for this is that Luke finished writing Acts before Peter and Paul's martyrdom in A.D. 64. A significant point to highlight is that the Gospel of Luke precedes Acts, further supporting the traditional dating of c. A.D. 60. Most scholars agree Mark precedes Luke, making Mark's Gospel even earlier. ▪︎ Finally, the majority of New Testament scholars believe that Paul's epistles are written from A.D. 48-60. Paul's outline of the life of Jesus matches that of the Gospels. 1 Corinthians is one of the least disputed books regarding its dating and Pauline authorship. In 1Corinthians chapter 15, Paul summarizes the gospel and reinforces the premise that this is the same gospel preached by the apostles. Paul quotes from Luke's Gospel in 1 Timothy 5:18, showing us that Luke's Gospel was indeed completed in Paul's lifetime. This would move the time of the completion of Luke's Gospel along with Mark and Matthew. This Internal Evidence presents a strong case for the early dating of the Gospels. EXTERNAL Evidence - Gospel Dates: ▪︎ Were the Gospels written by eyewitnesses of the events, or were they not recorded until centuries later? As with the internal evidence, the external evidence also supports a first century date. ▪︎ Fortunately, New Testament scholars have an enormous amount of ancient manuscript evidence. The documentary evidence for the New Testament far surpasses any other work of its time, with over 5000 manuscripts, and many are dated within a few years of their authors' lives. KEY documents: ▪︎ Chester Beatty Papyri contains most of the N.T. writings, and is dated around A.D. 250. ▪︎ The Bodmer Papyri contains most of John, and dates to A.D. 200. ▪︎ Rylands Papyri that was found in Egypt and contains large fragments of John, and dates to A.D. 130. From this fragment we can conclude that John was completed well before A.D. 130 because, not only did the gospel have to be written, it had to be hand copied and make its way down from Greece to Egypt. The majority of scholars agree that John is the last gospel written, so we can affirm its first century date along with the other three with greater assurance. EARLY New Testament Papyrus Manuscripts: ▪︎ Dead Sea Scrolls, the Full Text of Isaiah 53 and a portion of every book, c. 250 BC. ▪︎ Old Testament Greek Septuagint c. 200 BC. ▪︎ P52 (John Rylands Fragment) - John 18:31-33; 37-38 c. 96 AD ▪︎ P90 (Oxyrhynchus) - John 18:36; 19:7 c. 96 AD ▪︎ P104 (Oxyrhynchus) - Matthew 21:34-37, 43, 45 c. 60-65 AD ▪︎ P46 (Chester Beatty Papyrus) - Romans 5:17-6; 5-14; 8:15-25; 27-35; 10:1-11, 22, 24-33, 35; 16:1-23; 25-27. And Hebrews; 1 & 2; Corinthians; Ephesians; Galatians; Philippians; Colossians; 1 Thessalonians 1:1, 9-10; 2:1-3; 5:5-9, 23-28 c. 50’s-70’s AD ▪︎ P98 (IFAO) - Revelation 1:13; 2:1 c. 90 AD ▪︎ P66 (Bodmer Papyrus) - John 1:1-6,11; 6:35; 14:26; fragment of 14:29; 21:9 c. 70’s AD ▪︎ P67 Matthew 3:9, 15; 5:20-22; 25-28 c. 60-65 AD ▪︎ Evidence also comes from the Dead Sea Scrolls Cave 7. Jose Callahan discovered a large fragment of the Gospel of Mark and dated it to have been written in A.D. 50. Also large fragments of Acts and other epistles and dated them to have been written slightly after A.D. 50.4 Another line of evidence is the writings of the church fathers. ▪︎ CLEMENT of Rome sent a letter to the Corinthian church in A.D. 95. in which he quoted from the Gospels and other portions of the N.T. ▪︎ IGNATIUS, Bishop of Antioch, wrote a letter before his martyrdom in Rome in A.D. 115, quoting all the Gospels and other N.T. letters. ▪︎ POLYCARP wrote to the Philippians in A.D. 120 and quoted from the Gospels and N.T. letters. ▪︎ JUSTIN MARTYR, A.D. 150 quotes John 3. Church fathers of the early second century were familiar with the apostle's writings and quoted them as inspired Scripture. ▪︎ Early dating is important for two reasons. The closer a historical record is to the date of the event, the more likely the record is accurate. Early dating allows for eyewitnesses to still be alive when the Gospels were circulating to attest to their accuracy. The apostles often appeal to the witness of the hostile crowd, pointing to their knowledge of the facts as well (Acts 2:22, 26:26). Also, the time is too short for legends to develop. Historians agree it takes about two generations, or eighty years, for legendary accounts to establish themselves. From the evidence, we can conclude the Gospels were indeed written by the authors they are attributed to. THE First Fully Bound Bible Books/Codices ▪︎ Codex Vaticanus: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 280 - 330 AD ▪︎ Codex Siniaticus: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 300 - 350 AD ▪︎ Codex Alexandrius: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 350 - 400 AD ▪︎ Codex Vulgate: Origin 1st century M/S - first Codex, 380 - 400 AD JESUS and the Jews were multilingual ▪︎ "Pilate had a notice prepared and fastened to the cross. It read: 'JESUS Of NAZARETH, THE KING Of THE JEWS'. Many of the Jews read this sign, for the place where Jesus was crucified was near the city, and the sign was written in Hebrew, Aramaic, Latin and Greek" (John 19:19-20) ▪︎ The Gospels were written in Koine Greek being the World's language in the 1st century The Hebrew Bible was translated into Greek (Septuagint) c.200 BC for the many Greek speaking Jews It is well known that first-century Jerusalem was inhabited by Greek speaking Jews who were at least bilingual. And Jesus most likely was trilingual apart from the ability to read minds. So the original Gospels were written in Koine Greek and sent throughout the World.. ▪︎ Jewish culture was heavily influenced by Hellenistic culture, and Koine Greek was used not only for international communication but also as the first language of many Jews. This development was furthered by the fact that the largest Jewish community in the world lived in Ptolemaic Alexandria. (Wikipedia) GOD Protects His Sacred Words: ▪︎ "But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse! As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse!" (Galatians 1:8-9). ▪︎ Jesus said, "Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away" (Matt 24:35). ▪︎ God protects His Word the Gospels and warns of antichrists.. ▪︎ Christ's Good News of Salvation, His Birth, Crucifixion and Resurrection hasn't changed for 2000 years. ▪︎ The Gospels are evidenced by internal and external historical, archeological & literary facts. ▪︎ The Gospels are reliable and transparent with any variations transparently referenced in the footnotes. ▪︎ The Gospels have 1000 times more manuscripts than the most documented ancient literature by Greco-Roman historian, Suetonius. ▪︎ The Bible is the most comprehensive and reliable source about 1st century Jerusalem history and used by archaeologists for supporting research and evidence today.. Hallelujah.....

[@generaljg4373]

Christianity has no connection to abraham like Judaism and Islam, in christianity theres three gods

[@louiesafi3116]

One True God..being 3 Divine Persons..Triune.. Can you hear the Jinns and see the Antichrists...

[@yajujmajuj1739]

The only way these holes can be ducktaped is if they invent a time machine to go back to d 7th century

[@georgeo785]

Back to the future part 5

[@Thewatchman303]

4 years!!! Oh my goodness!!! The church can’t even agree if Jesus’s ministry was 1 or 3 years long!

[@Thewatchman303]

@mysotiras 018 ha ha ha how often do you actually read the bible? Genuinely, per day. How often?

[@divyachacko3449]

What a religion!

[@R-rr1]

Only 200 views ?

[@Pappu_9065]

Numbers doesn't matters the true message is important rather than false narrative

[@temporaryaccount5307]

@@Pappu_9065 he means shariatube is doing their thing.

[@generaljg4373]

The number is 3 theres 3 gods in christianity

[@georgeo785]

Goes out to many people that pass it on. I am telling people to watch. The truth hurts if it didn't there would be 0 trolls.

[@georgeo785]

​@@generaljg4373 the trolls can't stand the truth. Same old lame message from the devil and his cult following

[@nunya54]

May the people continue to be guided to Islam through your channel.

[@IslamicOrigins]

If you go to Islam, you will go to hell. Get out while you can.

[@wylderose3878]

Please share this to help them.

[@guardianangels111]

Who ever guided to Islam who wanna follow the devil and they just simply found this satisfaction in Islam 😅