RF 01 Pro Review by Gladiators Worth the Hype?

[@balintkato]

So far the RF01 Pro tennis racket seems very good to me, it works like a cannon (I don't get short with a little energy, I can keep the ball close to the baseline in displaced situations) and with good control. The strings are Luxilon ECO Power 1.25 mm, string tension: 20 kg and 19 kg. For one hand backhand , forhand cross hitting very good. Serve is bomb strong. The racket is stable. Worth trying lower string tensions!!! I think like the sweetpoint is also much bigger at lower string tension , because I had no problem with it.

[@sebastiandomagala9233]

If it fits it can be a weapon. Congrats on an obviously flawless swing style, or else you would be disappointed. I have a similar racquet, but 20/19 kg ist way too low for me.

[@johnmart127]

Gonna try this

[@svlagonda7417]

Alu Power at 51lbs worked best for me.

[@stantheman1893]

What kind of Racket do you play before?

[@balintkato]

@@stantheman1893 My previous racket is Head Boom Pro Auxetic 2.0 (2024) . My new racket is RF01 Pro. It is true that you have to pay more attention to the accuracy of the shot, but it is very worth it because with this racket I can hit the target much more accurately (even on the serve, which is great). The power of the racket excellent. For the net hitting game, it's very easy to hit the preparatory shots, you can place the ball accurately without any substantial spin. This is a wonderful racquet.

[@matteodf4628]

Personally I really in love for RF01PRO. I am playing with it since 2 weeks, and coming from PS97S and PS97 315gr, I find this one super fantastic. Free power, easier to move, super precise and great control. Of course need clean technique and to be physically prepared, but even if demanding it'll give back a lot. Very solid and amazing on volleys, flat groundstroke and slice serve.

[@balintkato]

I totally agree, my experience is the same.

[@germanjaime2919]

What this racket does for me is really good. It adds power without messing up control. Specially on days where im not super high on energy. I can hit the ball casually and still get 15 more mph than with my ps97. When i decide to go for my big shots i get a tone of spin which is great. Only problem i am having at the moment is with my serve and backhand slice. If i can fined a way to tune those two strokes than i will stick with this racket.

[@TennisEva]

I miss the old days... when a racket could actually get a bad review. When every review didn't sound like a sales pitch.

[@badsleeper5641]

Its shows how negative you are Every racket manufacturer for the past decades is focus for improvement how do we improve if we don’t make up for the bad side. Nowadays all rackets are really good the battle is what is unique and what play style will it fit.

[@lorenzozadro2892]

Of course you've known TennisEva for years, given the assumption on they being negative just for stating a valid point

[@cactuschef5229]

Yep, there’s the Canadian and North American racquet reviewers “influencers” who say every racquet is GOAT and “here’s a purchase link”.

[@Jakub_G_Tennis]

Totally agreed, its horrid what the yt reviewers have become

[@ayod0011]

Wow there are so many Federer sheep here getting offended that their king’s racquet is not a 10/10, cope harder guys.

[@mattthornsbury4264]

Awesome review, I did several hours with the Pro and the reg 01 and while the Pro had an incredible feeling at times, the sweetspot alone of the Pro was the only thing that made me just go with the regular 01 and add a little weight (sweetspot on the regular 01 is way more forgiving). Either way, sexy racquets, bravo Roger.

[@Toxicat_JaJa]

Where did you add the extra weight ?

[@hybrid11theory75]

It bothers me why so many ppl turn their brain off when something has "RF" on it. It must be the best racquet on the market.... LMFAO. Appreciate your honesty!!

[@lordwellingtonthethird8486]

Not unique to tennis, marketing does a lot. Look at phones. When was the last time apple or Samsung made a massive innovation yet people part with thousands?

[@hybrid11theory75]

@@lordwellingtonthethird8486 Well said, but some trusty reviewers raving about this frame just bc of "RF"... I'm sure if it wouldn't be a "RF" frame everyone would say, ok well another new mediocre racquet line...

[@sebastiandomagala9233]

​@@hybrid11theory75No. For those who already had good results with a PS RF this racquet might be a blessing. But the mayority will just go for the label and don't care about the actual racquet. It's not like the racquet is bad, it's not. In fact, for what it is it's perfect. Almost Yonex Regna level of perfect. But for all those players who are better suited to swing a Pure Drive at 280g it's quite a burden. Most reviewers are capable of playing alike to fit that racquet and see its potential. And it's called "RF pro" for a reason.

[@gladiatorstribe]

Thank you! Appreciate your appreciation!!

[@Bambotb]

I hate this racquet bc it’s culty vibe having RF everythng even in the butcap yuckkk

[@msalvs]

David Lloyd in Barcelona. I played on those very same courts a lot before COVID, although for clay I preferred the public courts at Montjuic. In any case both are miles better than Vall d’Hebron.

[@gladiatorstribe]

Agree with you!

[@germanslice]

@@gladiatorstribe Do you guys at the pro level ever use the low to high swing motion to drive the backhand slice with using the racquet edge for pronation? Because I use that type of flat slice when wanting to drive with pace to remove all the float from out of the ball so that it shoots it all through the court dipping it quickly over the netcord instead and that's how I deal with these low difficult skiddy balls in the court instead of just dinking them or floating them back with the normal backhand slice or digging those balls up under the racquet swings which can cause the ball to fall weak and short in the court and sit up.. To me its not all about the many different racquet brands or the many different types of strings or different tensions there are hundreds of them out there but at the pro level these things will probably matter more but to me who is only just at the club level all i worry about is what part of the racquet I'm using to drive the ball with.

[@pyrofeaks]

playing ATM with a tester for about 1 1/2 week, The normal 01 300g is way too light and for me I overhitting with it. But The 320g Pro. Damn. I straight ordered 2. what a beauty of Racket. So much Control, Spin Power and moveability. Feedback of the Frame, its just perfect. The Old Pro Staff RF97 which I played before is nothing for an Clubplayer/Tournament Player. Then I switched to the Pro Staff X v14. This was a ton better. But now. I got I manageable modern oldschool racket. It gives me everything I need. Not perfect at all. Its not a Racket for absolutly Spin Player. Not a Racket for Power. But it produces everything on a very very high average. This is amazing. First I was scared about the weight as the 340g from the RF 97 Autograph. On good days, when swinging good, when your timing is good the weight is not that big problem. But I was scared what is when a "bad" day occures. And the RF 01 Pro does it great. You can handle the Frame WAY WAY WAY easier then the Pro Staffs or other boxed Frame Control Racket. So even on bad days this Racket does its job. I noticed, when you got a bad day, you need to swing kind of slow (but through Of course). Just guard your Swing through the ball with no haste or with overpowering, then the Racket shows you everything. The Racket will do the Job. Overall you can Say you need a very very clean technique. Not the best as the Pro Staffs required but you need a solid clean technique. Nothing exotic with tons of stupid spin and so on. Just Through. The Racket will do it and generate a solid spin with control and power.

[@ClémentCanu]

Balance is supposed to be 31.5 cm not 32.5, probably typo mistake but this makes a huge difference when holding the racquet ! Cheers 😊

[@z1az285]

i play with the RF97A and in all honesty i love this frame. The only downside is its a bit stiff, so the string setup (type/ tension) is important. but other tha that? fantastic frame in all aspects including power, control, stability and one little facts is not discussed enough. Alcaraz light frame is one reason why he had a forearm injury. The other reason is his string setup. Both matter for lighter frames like the RF 01

[@b.lakeberg7456]

I loved this review. I am happy to see a review that was more critical of the racquet. 🎉

[@gladiatorstribe]

Thank you! Glad you enjoyed it!

[@jessetaylor6976]

Although I have given them up for the most part, the Pro Staff 90’s are still the best frames I’ve hit with. They demand an immaculate level of footwork and technique so it’s a great barometer for one’s level.

[@gladiatorstribe]

For sure!!

[@nero1375]

dude, the feeling of my PS autograph 2012 is way superior then RF97 that I have hahaha Way harder to play but is very rewarding

[@jessetaylor6976]

@@nero1375 never liked the RF 97s! Blades are much better. The signature is good but I found them 10-12 grams lighter on average than all the other models even though they claim to be the same. My favourite is the BLX black model which is just a touch softer than say the Kfactor. If only it wasn’t such a demanding little b*%#h 🤷‍♂️ I’d still be using them…too old and slow now.

[@andrecastro2466]

Totally agree... I don’t have the stamina to play tournaments with the PS90 anymore. But damn it is a lot of fun whenever i bring them out to the court.

[@homeropalacios9937]

Castigaste mucho su calificación en comfort y poder, yo tengo apenas una semana con ella y la he sentido muy comfortable, pero bueno, cuestión de gustos, a mi me ha encantado esta raqueta. Gracias por la reseña.

[@quentincrisp6933]

Roger left the game of tennis 2 years ago! Wilson (Amer Sport) has left us with this while paying Roger a reported amount of $10M to consult on the RF line. Let's see by next year if any ATP players are using it.

[@dickpiano1802]

You cannot say by next year. If it is good, the current juniors will start using it and you will see it used 10 years down the line under a paint job.

[@pac0re]

Wilson has always done this, bring out a new line of racquets and paintjob pro racquets to support the new product.

[@ruz8099]

"the frying pan" part was so good!!

[@gladiatorstribe]

Thank you!! 😂😂

[@gab_ale]

I think this racquet is mostly aimed at people who already use control frames. I am a ProStaff user and the racquet felt pretty good to me. Only complaint I have about it is that it is a bit slow on the serves. I liked it with freshly strung Alu Power at 53 lb, but once the tension dropped it started to suck. I would string it up to around 56 or 57 for my taste. Did I like the Pro more than my PS97 V14 or my TF40 18 x 20? Nope. I do customize my racquets. Just 2 grams at 12 on the PS and like 10 grams at the handle of the TF40. Also, the plain RF01 stock is pretty bad. It needs weight everywhere.

[@ayod0011]

Well, Alu power is anyway known for extremely rapid tension loss anyways.

[@gab_ale]

@@ayod0011 I had never played with any Luxilon string. That thing lost tension in about 1 hour. Was crazy to me.

[@RobertGarcia-s5z]

I use a prodtaff v14. WhAts your take on the difference?

[@gab_ale]

@RobertGarcia-s5z The PS feels more maneuverable, has less power, I feel it's more point and shoot, and handles more spin oriented swings better. The RF has more plow and power, and it's great for slices. It's more for flat hitters with eastern to semi western grips.

[@RobertGarcia-s5z]

@@gab_ale thanks

[@marcosdoyter7460]

Let’s get honest. People want that racquet because of Federer’s endorsement. I doubt he really had am active participation in its design. Probably, he had some hitting sessions and provided some feedback. Wilson’s engineer had a previous project of a more user-friendly control racquet. Nothing more than that. The racquet is as unforgiving as the Pro Staff line models. I would stay with other options in the market: Yonex Ezone 98, Tecnifibre Tfight300, Head Radical MP. Please, guys, don’t buy a racquet because the player who endorses it. Buy a racquet because it adapts to your game. The gladiator is the first honest reviewer of the racquet.

[@pac0re]

The original RF97 is a great heavy frame but too stiff for that weight and in the wrong hands leads to injury. RF01 is basically a rebrand of that with some minor tweaks and a "cool (and B/S) story" behind it. T-Fight 320 is fantastic at 95sq inch and you can really unleash ground strokes with it with little fear of bone shattering stiffness. At some point you have to compromise and get good right? Stiff commercial racquet that gets the ball over the net easier, or work harder for better groundstrokes with a more comfortable frame thats harder to use. The noob always goes for the pretty colours. I've hit with a heavily modded GAMMA racquet with all the tweaks including the silicone and it was just levels above anything retail.

[@SSJBen]

I tried it in 2 string configurations: Hybrid gut + luxilon element @ 53/56 lbs and full poly Alu power @ 47 lbs. All of them were 1.25. The full poly setup was just so much better feeling. There's a lot more leniency even in comparison to the hybrid with gut in it yet doesn't sacrifice too much in the power that gut offers. I do not think this racquet plays well with string setups in the 50s, it's definitely better in the high 40s IMO.

[@BigBoss-pd9mn]

Honestly, this racket is so good for me. I like the control and have always played with control racquets but damn does the little extra power on the RF01 Pro is nice. The feeling is also amazing. I think its not as good as the OG PS 97 (the red and black one) but its so comparable to my Yonex Regna. I can swap between the two and play the exact same.

[@ryanng4370]

How does this compare to the v13 Pro Staff (315g unstrung)?

[@kohenhill]

LETS GO GLADIATOR UPLOAD!! I know I would play horribly with this racket but I kinda want it just bc I love Federer. Quality upload like always

[@gladiatorstribe]

That's totally a reason to want a racket! No questions asked!

[@spizzz2]

no way haha, this vid came out when i was in the store checking the rf line out… luckily came to my senses and bought a regular pro staff instead. the amount of weight around the handle was really annoying to me especially, but im sure lead tape could fix that.

[@jonathanchen1026]

Why not just buy the 300g rf 01?

[@spizzz2]

@@jonathanchen1026 yeah that’s what i was looking at. sorry didn’t specify. that one especially was extremely heavy around the handle. the pro was quite nice but as he said in the video you needed to be very good to handle it which i’m not 🥲. it also had handle weight but less noticeable

[@gladiatorstribe]

Hahahaha that's cool!

[@ThesGt]

great review man! doesnt matter what the rest of the world says, if you dont like it you dont like it, we need a review of the RF01 of 300g

[@gladiatorstribe]

You're right! That's coming soon!

[@IsaacPeachey]

haha i knew this racquet would be a tricky stick, but you know its gonna be a great seller. How close is it to the blade 16x19 V9?

[@ChowTY42]

I just bought the laver cup edition RF 01 to own as a collectible and maybe someday sell it for more. I also bought a second laver cup one to just play with but now I’m thinking to not use the racquet at all.

[@BesterPflegerderWelt]

I think the difference or improvement of this racket model and its successors is minimal and only noticeable by a professional or someone who has to deal with it daily and for years

[@CH-yp5by]

Its ok you are not the first Tan tennis channel ripped it to shreds as well, I think you are better off not getting the pro and get the 300g version and customise it to your desired weight and balance. I would like to see you do a video by doing this and see how you go after adding about 2 or 3g of lead tape to both and 9 O'clock positions with a counter balance.

[@fedecarretie430]

And if you test the racket with a Wilson string setup??

[@abhinavduda]

@gladiatorstribe - I use the KBlade 98 18X20 as my main racket along with the Blade CV 18X20 as the back up. In terms of weight and the String Pattern (16X19) would I be able to adjust to the RF 01 Pro? Thanks!

[@peterandmaylamont4911]

Demo’d the RF01 pro and it feels like a club compared to my scalpel leaded up prostaff v13. More power, more forgiveness but far less precision.

[@OldSkoolLegend]

the outro music is so good.

[@andonivr]

I am user of PS97 V13 315g with leather grip, I was considering to switch to this one but after checking some reviews I think I will stick to my frame hehe.

[@germanjaime2919]

Do you want more power with the same control? If yes i would think about switching. Also this racket is more forgiving. I have not switched but im using the RF pro on days where im really low on energy.

[@andonivr]

@@germanjaime2919 Sometimes I think about switch to a different frame. I was used to Prince EXO 3 Tour, I had them with some lead tape, the weight was around 325 unstrung. But after a lot of usage the rackets are not useful anymore, so I switch to PS97 and it's ok, not as good for spin, but ok. I tried Vcores, I tried different rackets but I do not like the feel.

[@LaSalviaBodysurf]

I had the ps97 v13, just had good feel but terrible for power and spin and actual game scenario. Changes to radical, great feel power and spin, so much easier to use

[@pac0re]

@@andonivr You can add more spin by switching up strings, Black code (the square one) strings give free spin and are quite powerful too, with the right tension you may get what you're looking for from the PS97

[@adventure_scapes5039]

hearing and listing all the cons.. sounds like really its a string problem most likely strung too tight .. even Michelle from TW don't have that low of a launch angle they did recommend thin gauge, shaped strings on low tension so the more dense middle might be a problem for spin players. might be more suited for flat 95sq & under players (prestige/pro staff kind)

[@tophersuwita]

I strung all my rackets with 42-45 lbs tension Lynx Tour. Nevertheless, I find better power-control balance with Triax-poly hybrids in the low 50s. They open small sweet spot on Regna 98, Pure Strike VS etc alike to the full bed low tension poly

[@ariurip3751]

Sounds like a modern pro staff

[@rosshayden1416]

Any poly string recommendations ? Whats string snd tension fid you use. Im guessing its designed for gut hybrid

[@svlagonda7417]

Looking forward to Grish's experiences with this!

[@gladiatorstribe]

🫶🏼🫶🏼

[@ltwelv]

Hey which David Lloyd are you playing at?

[@FabianRitterG]

I feel there is still bias and you give the racket a better score than deserved. Starting from the fact that only few people will manage to use it well and that you can anyways find better frames that delivers good control and feel.

[@Ooulu]

I love the pro , add some weight in the handle and lead on 3 & 9 . Then it becomes a killer . Also sensation plus and Alu power at 55.

[@CH-yp5by]

Its already 320g unstrung ar eyou sure you can do that and keep your swing speed up ?

[@Toxicat_JaJa]

How much lead in the handle and on 3 & 9 would you recommend ?

[@leftyspinn]

​@@CH-yp5by you can lose some swing speed but keep pace of shot by adding weight. Power from weight is better for me. I always use rf97 but sometimes i use the lighter version pro staff and my shots feel weak because of less weight.

[@Ooulu]

@@CH-yp5by I mean I can, I was playing before with a six one 95. It doesn’t affect on swing speed , I added 3 grams on each side , and also I added weight on the handle to balance it out, so that it’s 9pts head light .

[@t2dev]

Any thoughts on the two other non-pro models???

[@tedneanderthal7373]

I don't understand why Wilson would introduce a new racquet line that is so similar (in size and stiffness) to its successful ProStaff line. It also is made to appeal to attacking players. Why not just introduce it as a new RF ProStaff?

[@germanjaime2919]

This racket is made for attacking players who need forgiveness and power. Two things that the pro staff is not made for. They tried it with the pro staff 100 and no one bought it. Seems like a good line to introduce. Of course they will try to make money using RF but i have been waiting for wilson to introduce a competitor to the yonex ezone. I really like that racket but i hate yonex grip shape. The only grip shape i can play with is the wilson pro staff grip shape which this racket has.

[@LaSalviaBodysurf]

Nah its just so they can introduce the RF brand and atract new customers from other brands that are RF fan

[@JA-SKI]

Beautiful one hand backhand smash 😉

[@gladiatorstribe]

Thanks! 🫶🏼🤗

[@isabenthakor5562]

Good video does anyone any really powerful rackets on the market

[@Rigo_S]

I heard other reviewers compare the feel to the PA98.. do you see any similarities?

[@yoyoyoyo140]

I have both racquets and would somewhat agree. The PA 98 has less control, but the feel in the sweet spot is very similar and you get a similar jarring sensation out of it, although the RF Pro feels a tiny bit better off centre, both racquets you get a really weak ball when it’s not hit in the sweet spot.

[@Rigo_S]

@@yoyoyoyo140 thanks! Which racket do you prefer and why?

[@yoyoyoyo140]

I think they suit different game styles. The PA gives you more free depth and launch angle, better counter-punching racquet, better kick serve, more approachable overall weight to manoeuvre around. The RF pro has more feel, better flat serve, better serve accuracy, very different balance , backhand feels better, better touch shots, much lower launch angle. I love my PA 98’s but I hate it for serve and volleys, also feel very disconnected to where ball is going. I’ve been playing with my Prostaff 97 V14 over the last week and that is better than both of them. For context I’m a 9.5 UTR in my 30’s so my preferences won’t suit everyone.

[@Rigo_S]

@@yoyoyoyo140 have you tried the 300g? I'm also in my 30s but a lower level. PA98 & PS10016x20 are my rackets. I need launch angle and a relatively head light balance as well as a defined sweet spot feel. I have concerns about the balance & spin potential of the RF01.

[@tonygareth221]

I did not like the racquet. Sold it on eBay a couple days of using it. Lots of spin and power but I doubt Federer would be using this thing. Had some positives but just didn’t feel good. I have a great slice but couldn’t slice with this . Oh well

[@johnnacke4134]

Any feedback on the RF Future?

[@gladiatorstribe]

Review coming soon!

[@notoriouso22]

I would like to know what you usually use

[@BullyGarfield.]

he uses a modded head gravity pro

[@gladiatorstribe]

Yes!

[@lordwellingtonthethird8486]

No racket will fix anything in your game. The racket I settled with is a racket I thought I’d never use!

[@gladiatorstribe]

Facts!

[@tonygareth221]

Sometimes my forehand and back hand felt good but better hit sweet spot

[@scottphommachanh9200]

Don’t take anyone’s word, DEMO it and find out for yourself. To be fair, I have not seen any review saying it is perfect nor will fix anyone’s game.

[@nooberrm]

I would like to watch more videos of you pretending to be a noob 😅

[@alwinvisker]

I am a worn out 53 year old tennis teacher. And I switch to this racket because it is the easiest player racket I have ever had in my hands. I tuned a little bit on 3 and 9 o’clock with 10 grams. Before that I had a Prestige Tour (Pro), Vcore 95 and a Percept 97 for years. Couldn't disagree with you more.

[@pac0re]

you sound like a pusher :P

[@razorelsilverflare7354]

If a racket requires you to hit on its sweet spot to release its full mechanic potential and is not forgiving at all...I will say that's a good "coach" racket, which lets you know immediately that something in your technique is wrong/off...but I bet most recreational players don't like this kind of racket, since most people want tools to compensate for users, in that mindset RF01 pro definitely is a undesirable racket😂 But if you are a player who wants to improve your tennis badly and don't wish to rely on racket forgiveness to save your day or ass...then I would say RF 01 pro is a very good racket.

[@malvec9013]

All the RF97 users at my club switched to the RF 01 PRO. 😶

[@クリームイカ]

So jealous about that

[@sebastiandomagala9233]

Of course they did. Who can really handle that weight anyway? At least there is something with an RF logo that mere mortals can handle. And make themselves a clown when the RF superplayer turns out to be a goddamn pusher.

[@gladiatorstribe]

😂😂

[@dimitrioskalampokas5042]

Only overall 8,3? Spin 7,5? 🇬🇷🎾🔝🔝🔝

[@gladiatorstribe]

Yep 🫣

[@secret_max3606]

is he sponsored? like not by wilson just in general

[@gladiatorstribe]

Nope

[@jonienglish3231]

Plays like a prince graphite 100 and 107, flexible

[@agradina]

Rachets and runners make it S tier eat that haters i am selling my vcores and buy it

[@LaSalviaBodysurf]

Who would imagine, just a bad racquet for recreational players and wilson trying to profit one last time from RF brand. Racquets like pro staff 97 isnt good for 99,9% of players, they feel good to hit stationary to a wall but not for real game.The funny thing is, most players online praise these kind of racquets that are very hard to use, they love a small Sweet spot leaded up racquet with 0 spin ( even tho they will get destroyed by a babolat player ). The 2 most hyped up racquets online are prestige and pro staff lmao. Internet and real life tennis are completely different lol

[@dwimusudem7943]

“He wanted to design something which would provide another income stream in addition to the millions he already has” basically sums up the b racquet

[@eastcoastphotography]

After hitting up with this and the RF01 - I'd honestly say the RF01 is for the higher end club player, the pro is too much racket and probably too much racket for the author here @Gladiators Tribe. Add to this the expectation that this racket will change your game - seriously ? Add #2 to this that the racket you tested was stung way to high - checkout what the reviewers are saying here on youtube buddy. Go out and try a RF01 strung at around 48lbs tops - I think it would suit you much better - simply put the pro is aimed at higher ability players than you buddy.

[@mouhamedjunior]

Hello I like your videos hope you see this

[@gladiatorstribe]

Thank you!!

[@shauryathakor8798]

next video pure drive review??? nice video keep it up

[@mastorga69]

I think you were Having a bad day!

[@hannesreinhardt1399]

Never again abuse your raquet like that (at the net)! Wow. By the way, i totally get why you'll keep that stick and don't return it😂. So therefore again, even more, don't....

[@gregmaier5151]

It’s a bag o crap! At least the RF01 300g was 🤡🤦🏼‍♂️

[@BesterPflegerderWelt]

Hmm could You maybee check this raquet against the Old Pro Staff tour 90 hmm it should be interesting

[@GameSetMatch_Yash2005]

Why do you look older and a bit bulky in the thumbnail😅

[@gladiatorstribe]

😂😂😂 not my best angle

[@Bambotb]

Blade pro so much better

[@stannisbaratheon8155]

Im just a bit confused, you begin the comment pretty negative and you are actualy positive on a lot of aspects. Youre racket of choice the head pro is a dead board off centre and also for real advanced players…… perhapse you also got a Little bit caried away on the hype but on the negative site? I think you should do the test again without the adrenaline and we will find out wether you stick with it or change.?

[@Emolga6274]

U need to atleast be an average level player to use pro rackets . I recommend the 10 dollar Walmart rackets for u

[@gladiatorstribe]

Thanks for the recommendation 😘

[@wozmac771]

Sorry, he is just trying to make money now.

[@jaimed.9154]

being cynical is cool.... but being cynical all the time is weird

[@wozmac771]

@@jaimed.9154 I am not being cynical. I am being realistic. He is a great businessman and a marketer. He will take one small thing and turn it on its head, use his business team to make it a success.

[@pac0re]

It's just another cashgrab unfortunately.

[@LucianLinkous]

Never heard of you, now I know why.

[@massimodanzelmo4607]

Most testers of the rf 01 say it's a flop of a rachet heavy and unhandling 👎

[@ValGur-97]

Boldy with a pony lol

[@gladiatorstribe]

😂😂

[@cr1tt3r72]

This early?

[@cholo1598]

there is nothing more to invent except sales tactics

[@TW-uh1ny]

Bad racket at least the 300gr version

[@HomyakHamster]

Гришаня, жду в подарок от тебя эту ракетку))) мне 320 г пожалуйста)))

[@TennisGuy3412]

I demoed this racquet just to test it, and I am SOO glad I didn’t buy it. It felt like brick in a way, because it was very hard to play with spin, and to generate pace. My spinny strokes felt very flat on this racquet. I would HIGHLY not recommend this racquet to anyone

[@ViaticalTree]

So because you don’t like it you think no one will like it? 🤦‍♂️

[@TennisGuy3412]

I stated that “I would highly NOT RECOMMEND”. This doesn’t mean that you wouldn’t like it, but that it wasn’t for me

[@sebastiandomagala9233]

This thing is called "RF pro" for a reason. You are not Roger, nor are you a pro, so that racquet doesn't fit you. But it fits me like almost no other racquet does. And many others as well. It's not that the racquet doesn't suit you. It's more like you don't suit the racquet.

[@ViaticalTree]

@@TennisGuy3412 “I would HIGHLY not recommend this racquet to anyone.”

[@TennisGuy3412]

It doesn’t fit my play style, but it may fit yours

[@sapientbudgie5652]

Your footwork looks terrible on clay. You look like a club 4.5 player at best. Racket won’t make a difference for you. You need a technique overhaul

[@gladiatorstribe]

Thanks for the advice

[@sapientbudgie5652]

@@gladiatorstribe you are most welcome!

[@AlexandrawOfficial_Lexi]

The old Prince Michael Chang racquet is the sweetest racquet of all time. for purist ball hitters.

[@theFedHD]

When I saw this racket it made me want to buy another RF97 hahah

[@クリームイカ]

That's sh*t too, you won't win anything against any high level players with that wond

[@sebastiandomagala9233]

​@@クリームイカIf he plays like Roger he will. If not he won't. It's as simple as that. If have never ever lost to anybody wielding a PS 97 RF. And never will probably. Overestimation is a safe way to lose.

[@jayp123]

Just use a pro staff 97, forget the rf97

[@AlexandrawOfficial_Lexi]

Oh no that hat!! :( Cant stand Federer

[@brianshaw6907]

Why don't you like fed