Just discovered 'The Rest is History' and loving it. When talking about safety features on Titanic, one of the things that doesn't get mentioned is that she took about 2.5 HOURS to sink, which allowed time to muster passengers, launch lifeboats, and listen to the band play 'Nearer my God to thee'. Compare this to Empress of Ireland which sank in less than 15 minutes after a collision with another vessel in 1914. Titanic's design may not have saved her from sinking but did allow much more time for the crew to react to the damage.
@jilliansmaniotto23262 ай бұрын
exactly!!
@philipbrowne6310 ай бұрын
The other expression here in Belfast is: "Titanic - she was alright when she left!"
@MartyH99Ай бұрын
Sadly not! She sank because of design flaws- put in place in H&W!
@egm86029 күн бұрын
Yes! And the stellar career of the Olympic proved it!
@tutorjames6665 ай бұрын
That Churchill impression was immaculate 🇬🇧
@lakedistrict945010 ай бұрын
You chaps brilliantly bring this alive. Fantastic. Thank you.
@dietersherry993610 ай бұрын
Brilliant. I loved it when one of you said that the Titanic was 'beneath me'...ha ha. A few graphics might punctuate the commentary, but perhaps I am a philistine? The sequence of the episodes is rather unclear...unless I am missing an indicator. A top-notch production. Thank you.
@michaelbedford801710 ай бұрын
I remember a magazine cartoon many years ago on this subject. It showed a crowd of relatives outside the offices of the 'White Star Line'. In the middle of the throng a Polar bear was elbowing his way to the front calling 'Any news of the iceberg!'
@jonathonjubb662610 ай бұрын
Probably 'the Eye'...
@themo.10 ай бұрын
Addicted to the rest is history ever since I came across it on Spotify! Only *just* found out you're on YT. Now I get to WATCH history in the making. Let joy be unconfin'd
@artsbabydoll3 ай бұрын
i usually don't watch podcasts, but I love history, esp the Titanic. You gentlemen are amazing & I love your channel.
@nickroberts99010 ай бұрын
Your Titanic series is absolutely fantastic! The most enjoyable yet. I'm going to have to listen to it again. 👌
@P4neK4ke10 ай бұрын
The way he quote Churchill ! Wonderful.
@tav935210 ай бұрын
Hey guys, nice podcast and enjoy your work. I'm actually a serving Master in the merchant navy so I took a particular interest in this episode. Your criticism of Captain Smith is unfair and I don't think you adequately explained why he had those two incidents. The collision with HMS Hawke was due to interaction between the two vessels, which whilst we understand very clearly now, was not understood or experienced at the time. I suggest your listeners look up interaction between vessels. Thanks!
@jilliansmaniotto23262 ай бұрын
smith also wasn’t at the helm at the time of the collision. the ship was helmed by a harbor pilot. more than anything, it was the harbor pilot’s fault. smith was essentially in charge in name only while the pilot was on board.
@CollectiveWest110 ай бұрын
Great series. One of your best. I have followed your wonderful podcast since my brother introduced me to it. Interesting to hear the list of items loaded at Southampton. One item omitted from loading which would have been useful was the key to the box holding the sole pair of binoculars on board, which a departing officer should have given to Charles Lightoller. That omission was why the lookouts had to rely on the Mark One Eyeball to watch for icebergs.
@gwcstudioАй бұрын
It's important to remember that these ships were the concordes or space shuttles of their day. Nobody cut corners, it's just that they had not yet thought of all the things that could go wrong. In fact, I bet the chief engineer of one of the liners would never accept blow-by on an O-ring as within margin of error. The builders of Titanic thought of darned near everything but they missed a few details nobody else thought of either.
@GoBlueGirl782 ай бұрын
Great episode! There are many stories like the train delay at the end; my grandmother’s best friend told me how her mother missed boarding at Queenstown because of a problem with their carriage (I think it was a broken wheel).
@markarnold55933 ай бұрын
I read "Captain of the Carpathia: The seafaring life of Titanic hero Sir Arthur Henry Rostron by Eric L. Clements" a couple of years ago.... great book about an amazing guy, and the era he lived through from sailing big square riggers, to the luxury liners..... Post Titanic sinking, one of the biggest celebs on earth.....
@tonykehoe12310 ай бұрын
“You don’t get sick on the Titanic….” You just get sunk 😊
@Jay-vr9irАй бұрын
I agree The Queen Mary 2 is a drag , I however crossed on The Norwegian Escape from Southampton to Miami it was fantastic .
@vespers9610 ай бұрын
Love this series and this ep was riveting 😉 well done guys
@3rdager10 ай бұрын
In 1977 I joined the S.S. Mercator 1 in New York and I recall being shown an old newspaper cutting which showed a photo of the bearded and braided captain of a ship which had failed to stop before ploughing through to 12th avenue earlier in that century. Any suggestions on where I might locate that article?
@RichardM333Ай бұрын
Search "Wikipedia: List of online newspaper archives"
@frankknudsen84210 ай бұрын
The contractor suggested that Titanic use a new, larger type of davit which could give the ship the potential to carry 48 lifeboats. They had been tested in Belfast and was determined they could carry 75 full grown adults. So you're absolutely correct. 64 - the number of lifeboats the Titanic ship could have been capable of carrying a total well over the ships maximum capacity of 3,547 people. The regulations required a vessel of 10,000 tons or more to carry 16 lifeboats with a total capacity of 9,625 cubic feet 272.5 m. The Titanic came in at roughly 49,000 tons.
@johncarroll77210 ай бұрын
Oceanliner Design videos are excellent
@BenjaminNavillus8 ай бұрын
Particularly the virtual tour of the Titanic episodes - outstanding.
@drgeorgek10 ай бұрын
Excellent work fellas 👏
@martiwilliams45928 ай бұрын
Very gripping: And here I thought I knew the story. Thank you!
@frankknudsen84210 ай бұрын
Probably the best source is the 94' documentary titanic death of a dream, " and the legend lives on." Of all the many documentaries that have been made about the Titanic disaster, this two-part, 192-minute film, produced in 1994 for the Arts & Entertainment network, remains the most thorough, authoritative, and fascinating chronicle of the Titanic tragedy.
@ruthmckittrick627910 ай бұрын
My Grandmother was alive at this time and made reference to seeing the Titanic launched and had generations of Shipyard workers, what I wished I'd asked her and had conversations with her but being this elderly, I was too young at the time.
@bullfighteragainstnonsense99242 ай бұрын
You guys are great
@fastpublish10 ай бұрын
Andrews' older brother went on to be Prime Minister of Northern Ireland. Suggestions that Titanic actually sank because all the ceili dancing going on in steerage weakened its structure, have been disproved. No, it was definitely because shipyard workers wrote "No Pope Here" on the ship.
@tulyar5710 ай бұрын
I don't think you've grasped the idea of a "shippy smell", lads. It is not similar to a cross-channel ferry. The idea of these ships is that the sealed interiors are designed for passengers not crew. Cargo vessels (including those carrying fare paying passengers) previously would have been redolent of coal, bunkers, oil and generators. As for Tom asking why 'Liverpool' was emblazoned on its arse-end it was because White Star (and Cunard at the time) was the port of registry. Dominic asks if White Star are still going, I think they merged with Cunard in the 1930s and were bought out by Cunard in the '40s and Cunard changed registry to Southampton. Their ships are now registered in Hamilton, Bermuda (flag of convenience)
@livesouthernable3 ай бұрын
Another point about the lifeboats is that most ships list severely to one side as they’re sinking, so often the lifeboats on the opposite side can’t be launched anyway. During the sinking of Lusitania and Britannic, the lifeboat launches went very badly and people died. Much better to make the ship more unsinkable
@stephenhoughton63210 ай бұрын
Hi, great episode. What is your view of the idea that the purpose of the lifeboats was to ferry people to nearby ships summoned by radio. As in the Republic sinking.
@vernonhiggins332310 ай бұрын
I've always thought too on the lifeboat issue that 3rd class would have been virtually empty on the 'return' New York to Southampton voyage. Lifeboat places would have matched passenger numbers.
@louiseoliver345310 ай бұрын
The lifeboat thing was because it was to do with tonnage (based on cargo vessels) and lifeboat capacity was based on ships of 10k tons and hadn't been updated for years. White Star bragged in its ads that lifeboat capacity was actually above the legal minimum which it was. The main tragedy I think is that they were often lowered half empty. They couldn't have saved everyone but they could have saved a few hundred more lives. I read years ago that the lifeboats hadn't been tested to their maximum capacity so the crew weren't sure if they could hold everyone
@sifridbassoon4 ай бұрын
I seem to remember watching a couple of videos that would imply that double bottoms and horizontal bulkheads were invented and used on ships earlier than Titanic. Am I wrong?
@lorlabear9 ай бұрын
You may be interested to know that the Harbour Commissioners' Office in Belfast is home to a dining room table which was completed too late and never made it onto the ship before she sailed!
@mrNibrud3 ай бұрын
It was the iceberg’s maiden voyage, too. What are the chances
@dietersherry993610 ай бұрын
My apologies...there are some graphics...perhaps I was too engrossed in the commentary to notice them.
@frankknudsen84210 ай бұрын
First off im in no way whatsoever attempting to upstage either of you gentlemen. Your exemplary in every aspect of your trades and talent and i rarely miss your broadcasts, please continue your insightful in depth subjects. But, i finally get to use my expensive ass degrees I'll b paying off til im 60😅. Mr. Alexander Carlyle was the contractor from the Wellin company hired to build additional davits and boats to expand the number of lifeboats. Ismay opted out for the original number of 20 total. This was far too few for the number of people aboard, and yet remarkably, this was technically legal; the law at that time based the number of lifeboats required on the gross register tonnage of a ship, not her passenger capacity. No one had envisioned in the drunkest bouts thought ships would ever get that size. Thanks ever much
@louiseoliver345310 ай бұрын
They actually had more than the legal minimum!
@frankknudsen84210 ай бұрын
@louiseoliver3453 I thought that's what I said. According to the board of trade . But not in terms of complete practical accommodations
@louiseoliver345310 ай бұрын
@@frankknudsen842 I believe tonnage was only up to 10k tons while the big T was 4 times that. I read somewhere that the crew hadn't tested the lifeboats so one reason they were only half full was the crew didn't know if they'd sink. The tragedy is they could have saved more lives
@bobmurphy622910 ай бұрын
I saw a 'documentary' which said there was a fire in a coal bunker which was burning when they left Southampton. The Stokers were raking out burning coal and shovelling it into the boilers. This was why it was tralelling fast at night and met its end - they had to get rid of the burning coal. A picture of her leaving Southampton shows paint peeling where the bunker was located. How true I wonder?
@jilliansmaniotto23262 ай бұрын
oh for the love of god. that story is bullshit. small fires in coal holds were extremely normal. they happened all the time. they were absolutely not shoveling extra coal into boilers to get rid of smoldering coal. the picture DOES NOT show paint peeling, nor is there any indication the smoldering coal caused structural damage. the discoloration is most likely either a reflection picked up on film strangely or a smudge on the photograph itself. the location of the smudge is also NOWHERE NEAR where the coal bunkers were located. the smoldering coal also would not have been remotely hit enough to affect the steel or paint like that. the way they dealt with coal fires, including this particular coal fire, was to try to separate the smoldering coal from the rest of the coal by shoveling it into different bunkers. that is what happened here. in fact, it’s widely accepted that this actually resulted in significantly reducing the number of lives lost as the shoveled coal caused a slight list of the ship to port. when the ship hit the berg on the starboard side, resulting in the rush of seawater through the starboard side, the existing slight port-side list made it so that the ship sank on a mostly even keel. this allowed the sinking to go more slowly as it prevented some huge, rapid list to starboard… most ships when sinking eventually develop a strong list to one side, which makes it impossible to launch lifeboats from one side and speeds overall sinking (and possibly causes it to capsize). titanic sunk mostly on even keel, only starting to show more list to starboard at the very end. half of the launched lifeboats likely wouldn’t have been launched and would have gone down still attached to the ship if not for the slight port list. they are going “fast at night” because some captains, like captain smith, felt that the best course for dealing with ice fields was to get through and out of the ice field as quickly as possible. the dipshit who pumped the coal fire story is a hack and a laughingstock in the history/titanic community.
@JonathanRossRogers3 ай бұрын
28:56 TIL that "titanic" is a verb.
@green856wАй бұрын
The Titanic was registered in Liverpool. Neither where a ship is built, nor the port from which it might usually operate have no bearing on where it can be registered.
@coulie2710 ай бұрын
That train delay story at the end is insane. Fickle fate!
@trumphodge9 ай бұрын
Dominic says Captain Smith's annual compensation of 1250 GBP would be equivalent to about 800,000 GBP today--a million with his bonus. That seems way overstated. I have been reading Trollope novels recently, and he is quite detailed about the incomes and assets his characters possess. I just finished a book written in 1858, and by way of illustration, one woman has an income of 500 pounds--a nicely comfortable income when living in the country. Not as comfortable in London. A conversion website says that would be the equivalent of 81,000 GBP today. Increase by 2.5 for Capt Smith's 1,250 GBP salary and you get 202,500. Plus his salary was in 1912, when inflation would have eaten away a bit of that. I know conversions are tricky but a factor of 4 has to be too high.
@upscrambled93672 ай бұрын
"but but but Tom" vs "HOWEVER Dominic"
@gwcstudioАй бұрын
2,500lb of sausages would look like 3 pallets stacked with sausages.
@Terinije10 ай бұрын
Important to note that claims that the Titanic was unsinkable were mostly after the fact hyperbole to emphasize the shock of the sinking.
@colingibson59664 ай бұрын
They just about got the lifeboats they had, launched. Even if they had enough boats for everyone it's doubtful they would of got them full and off before the ship was at too steep an angle to launch them.
@colincampbell4261Ай бұрын
Full steam ahead........oh shit!
@IB4theAIB4 ай бұрын
All that water and only twelve mops, no wonder they sank
@DavidMBRichardson10 ай бұрын
But I've heard that the quality of the steel used for steel plates and rivets was not up to much.
@TransmissionEpicts10 ай бұрын
It was an interesting and potentially surprising theory, as quality-control and materials science wasn't as advanced as it is now, of course. But in tests conducted on recovered Titanic steel plate and rivets the materials were found to be of a good standard for the time, and fairly consistent. Titanic's sister ship "Olympic" was made from materials from the same suppliers and that ship served up almost until WW2, so the steel was sturdy enough ultimately.
@jilliansmaniotto23262 ай бұрын
that story is bullshit and has been debunked. jesus christ.
@waynemcauliffe-fv5yf10 ай бұрын
Go the Gaels. Cheers fellas
@egm86029 күн бұрын
Olympic was not Andrews' design. It was Carlisle's design. Andrews simply carried water for Carlisle. Ismay gave attention to useless detail for status. Third Class provided the bulk of the income. This is the snob podcast, not fact based.
@frankknudsen84210 ай бұрын
The original Olympic class ships was 1. Olympic 2. Titanic 3. Gigantic until the Titanic went down and gigantic sounded pretentious so it was renamed Britanic
@jbones359510 ай бұрын
"He looks exactly as he should be" lol
@fastpublish10 ай бұрын
And it was recklessly overloaded with cliches ...
@JamesTilsley110 ай бұрын
Enoch Powell was a Brummie, he was just the MP for Wolverhampton South West.
@kammacleod433310 ай бұрын
I'm from Staffordshire we aren't brummies
@johncarroll77210 ай бұрын
£800 in 1912 in now £400,000 . Where does Dominic get that calculation, think £120, 000 is a more accurate calculation..
@jonathonjubb662610 ай бұрын
Are we sure it's not the Olympic at the bottom of the Atlantic? Really sure?
@jilliansmaniotto23262 ай бұрын
… yes. 100%. that bullshit has been repeatedly and thoroughly debunked.
@MrZhefishАй бұрын
zhe englisch, zhey make their jokes about sausage... ... but zhey eat it for breakfast!
@daydays1210 ай бұрын
scandalous greed and lack of concern for safety....it'd only be the poor who drowned, so who cares?
@jilliansmaniotto23262 ай бұрын
that’s your take? did you not watch this video at all?
@johnchambers502910 ай бұрын
Hey guys, the Titanic wasn't the largest ship built or even the largest passenger liner built. It was one of the largest in it's day.
@Salien199910 ай бұрын
To be very particular, she was the largest ship that was still in service when she entered service. Not the largest ship ever built as they say in the video.
@qounqer10 ай бұрын
good try anglos, i know what yall did.
@ianshaver895410 ай бұрын
You also should consider gender divisions on the titanic.