Richard Dawkins & Deepak Chopra (Sub) | El Encuentro del Siglo | CDI 2013 Dangerous Ideas

  Рет қаралды 915,604

LaCiudaddelasIdeas

LaCiudaddelasIdeas

Күн бұрын

Diálogo entre el multipremiado científico Richard Dawkins con el famoso escritor y médico Deepak Chopra sobre si existe un propósito en el universo, si la religión es buena o mala para la humanidad y la relación entre la ciencia y la espiritualidad. Siendo ambos científicos de formación tienen diferentes resultados y diferentes formas para explicar la ciencia. También, la plática por un lado aborda problemáticas ligadas a la ciencia y su metodología frente a los fenómenos de la conciencia y el misticismo, el origen de la vida, el universo y el lenguaje y, por el otro, la espiritualidad y sus problemas del lenguaje y la confusión que puede conducir.
Richard Dawkins:
Richard Dawkins (Miembro exclusivo de la Real Sociedad de Londres, Fellow of the Royal Society, FRS) fue profesor "Charles Simonyi" de la Cátedra de la Comprensión Pública de la Ciencia (Public Understanding of Science) de la Universidad de Oxford hasta su retiro en el 2008.
Hizo su doctorado en Oxford bajo el ganador del Premio Nobel, el zoólogo Niko Tinbergen. Es autor de doce libros como: El gen egoísta (The Selfish Gene), El fenotipo extendido (The Extended Phenotype), Destejiendo el arcoiris (Unweaving the Rainbow), El capellán del diablo (A Devil's Chaplain), El cuento del antepasado: un viaje a los albores de la evolución (The Ancestor's Tale), El espejismo de Dios (The God Delusion) y Evolución. El mayor espectáculo sobre la Tierra (The Greatest Show on Earth).
Deepak Chopra:
Es el creador de la Fundación Chopra y, cofundador y Jefe del Centro Chopra de Wellbeing en Carlsbad, California. Es cronista para San Francisco Chronicle y The Washington Post, y contribuye regularmente con Oprah.com, Intent.com y The Huffington Post.
Chopra es conocido por ser un prolífico autor de más de 75 libros, con 21 bestselles de The New York Times, tanto de relatos de ficción como obras ensayísticas. Los libros del Dr. Chopra han sido publicados en más de 35 idiomas. Sus últimos bestsellers incluyen Súper Cerebro: Nuevos avances para maximizar la salud, felicidad y bienestar (Super Brain: Unleashing the Explosive Power of your Mind to maximize Health, Happiness, and Spiritual Well Being), Guerra de dos mundos (War of the Worldviews), Reinventa tu cuerpo, resucita tu alma (Reinventing the Body, Resurrecting the Soul) y Soluciones espirituales (Spiritual Solutions - Answers To Life's Greatest Problems).
Todos los derechos reservados. © Poder Cívico A. C.
Prohibida su copia, distribución y venta sin permisos del autor.
La Ciudad de las Ideas es un Festival Internacional de Mentes Brillantes con sede en la ciudad de Puebla, México. Andrés Roemer, Presidente de Poder Cívico A.C., es el audaz curador del festival.

Пікірлер: 6 600
@blacksheep5183
@blacksheep5183 5 жыл бұрын
That thing at the start made me check if I clicked on the right video.
@jadenhalstead7290
@jadenhalstead7290 4 жыл бұрын
I thought I was the only who saw that. What the fuck was that doing right before a debate about God?
@NikhilMathew122333
@NikhilMathew122333 4 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@carolthomas8528
@carolthomas8528 4 жыл бұрын
Black Sheep - The whole idea was to whip the crowd into a frenzy - rather like a charismatic preacher - all hot air .
@desarguesbaptiste5577
@desarguesbaptiste5577 4 жыл бұрын
I thought that was quite funny but didn't understant either ^^
@UKFX
@UKFX 4 жыл бұрын
That dude dangling down slowly looked like he had no clue what he was doing lolol.
@Dimera09
@Dimera09 8 жыл бұрын
wtf is this shit at the beginning hahaha
@no22sill
@no22sill 5 жыл бұрын
Lol
@rakeshkumarjha7252
@rakeshkumarjha7252 5 жыл бұрын
That is at least better than the Rotten-Deepak-Talk
@totty2524
@totty2524 5 жыл бұрын
This beggining is so overly-epic and dramatic, it's hilarious, I love it.
@venkatnz1229
@venkatnz1229 5 жыл бұрын
science says it does not believe in god but it uses Infinity quite often to prove the theories. what is infinity if not god.
@totty2524
@totty2524 5 жыл бұрын
@@venkatnz1229 Not god.
@devJ002
@devJ002 3 жыл бұрын
I need Deepak Chopra's confidence when he talks about random shit that he doesn't have a clue on.
@dumont-art3971
@dumont-art3971 Жыл бұрын
What I can tell you is that all that D.Chopra says is in keeping with Kant and Plato and most certainly all of the Vedas, particularly Vedanta. It is a true expression of Non-duality of the wisdom traditions This, in turn, is in keepig with both quantum physics and metaphysics. Mr. Chopra is speaking of ontology and epistemology. Mr. Dawkins has restricted himself to empirical materialism, only. Much kindness.
@S_Bellew
@S_Bellew Жыл бұрын
@@dumont-art3971 - Plato had been proven wrong on virtually everything what he said. He was big in the past, but he's mostly irrelevant in the modern day. Neither you, nor Chopra have any idea what "quantum leap" means. Also, there's no such a thing s "quantum shift".
@dumont-art3971
@dumont-art3971 Жыл бұрын
@@S_Bellew @Vadim Ivanchenko Dear me. If you can explain me any of what Plato was talking about, perhaps we could go further with the conversation. In general we are talking about epistemology and ontology Vadim. Who, if you don't mind me asking, would you or forward as an exemplar of superior understanding of metaphysics - Immanuel Kant? Hegel? Deepak Chopra is putting forward understandings which are in keeping with these peoples discussions.
@dumont-art3971
@dumont-art3971 Жыл бұрын
@@S_Bellew Metaphysics does not become 'irrelevant' Vadim. The reason for this is that if is an explanation of the 'timeless'. It is knowledge of true Being, true Knowing. It is experience of the Eternally True. This does not, we might, very humbly say, change with time. Rather, is it not so, the 'ever-changing' goes on ad infinitum. This, in the ancient traditions, is known as Mara, maya or prakrti. We might also call it 'flux'.
@dumont-art3971
@dumont-art3971 Жыл бұрын
@@S_Bellew Plato, for example, was talking about the 'figures on the wall of a cave', saying that all most of us see, are the dancing shadows as the fire lights up the figures. To really see truth, or Reason, we need to Go Beyond the illusion. How do we do this? According to Kant, Schopenhauer and Deepak Chopra, we must transcend the mundane. How do we do this? This is the domain of metaphysics. As stated, Mr.Dawkins is keeping to 'nice little, safe,' empirical-reductionist ' science'. I mean no ill will to Mr. Dawkins or to yourself, however, I must highlight that towering majesty of metaphysics over 'sense-based' reductive techniques.
@Ericsahi
@Ericsahi 3 жыл бұрын
“Sometimes I start a sentence and I don’t even know where it’s going to end up” -Michael Scott - Deepak Chopra
@riccardoromeo5346
@riccardoromeo5346 2 жыл бұрын
joe biden
@jayaramj9630
@jayaramj9630 2 жыл бұрын
That's very comedically humourous man
@realhumanbean7915
@realhumanbean7915 2 жыл бұрын
chopra in a nutshell
@ShawnGonsalvez
@ShawnGonsalvez 2 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂 love a good office reference
@xfunkypicklex
@xfunkypicklex 2 жыл бұрын
Really hit the nail on the head there 👍
@josephengel8263
@josephengel8263 4 жыл бұрын
I started using the words “consciousness”, “universe”, “quantum” more frequently and now I have a bunch of potheads following me around and calling me “guru”. When do I get my diamond encrusted glasses?
@stfu_rito
@stfu_rito 4 жыл бұрын
they are actually rhinestones
@nicolasyacar7181
@nicolasyacar7181 4 жыл бұрын
He believes in pantheism but he’s just to stupid to recognize it, and you know, he makes a few bucks out of his stupidity. Which is even more stupid. He will rationalize all his life. He deeply may have good intentions tho.
@Rigvedification
@Rigvedification 4 жыл бұрын
@Robert atom has consciousness only when one smokes the woo woo weed
@Shahid-mh8cj
@Shahid-mh8cj 4 жыл бұрын
@@Rigvedification i see you're a fellow who loves James Randi 🍻
@Rigvedification
@Rigvedification 4 жыл бұрын
@@Shahid-mh8cj I do admire him for exposing spooky nonsense 🎊
@Marius-vw9hp
@Marius-vw9hp 7 жыл бұрын
"Chopras hair has awareness and the ability to curl itself" - Freeman Dyson.
@TicoAcosta
@TicoAcosta 5 жыл бұрын
Hahahahahaha!
@donkaler213
@donkaler213 4 жыл бұрын
i don’t think he said that he should sue you
@rafaelgonzalezj
@rafaelgonzalezj 4 жыл бұрын
@@donkaler213 welcome to Internet!
@donkaler213
@donkaler213 4 жыл бұрын
@@rafaelgonzalezj u clearly didn't watch the video then😂
@PittsburghSonido
@PittsburghSonido 4 жыл бұрын
Rafael González Bro that’s what Dawkins said in this debate. Donkaler is joking.
@Sanjiban5
@Sanjiban5 6 жыл бұрын
Deepak thinks "If you can't convince a person, confuse him"
@nairobi1519
@nairobi1519 4 жыл бұрын
Confuse with heavy words and scientific terms
@danaignat8790
@danaignat8790 4 жыл бұрын
exactly... pure gibberish!!!!!!
@lukpo1997
@lukpo1997 4 жыл бұрын
Are you Shure that is not just a part of the people that don't understand what is he saying? Does for exple the term "ego death" or "cosmic counsciousness" means something for you? If you ever had a transcendental experience, you will understand (and I'm not saying this implies a metafisical reality)
@buboclan
@buboclan 4 жыл бұрын
Gargon - A ridiculous word from the ideology of Jubril that was formed by mistakenly saying it instead of jargon. It has now evolved to mean a mixture of Garbage and Jargon
@johnlawrence2757
@johnlawrence2757 4 жыл бұрын
@Sanjiban Bairagya Not difficult in your case
@ani4787
@ani4787 2 жыл бұрын
1:02:59 “A good metaphor is one that clarifies and does not obscure” - what priceless words 👏🏼
@eminkuliev2466
@eminkuliev2466 Жыл бұрын
Not necessarily, not necessarily. A good metaphor may take you out of the intellect and to a different realm, realm of feelings and ... .. more
@abelochoa584
@abelochoa584 Жыл бұрын
Dawkins´ definition of a metaphor is only words. Chopra beat him from beginning to end. What Dawkins called jargon was backed by those many scientists Chopra named: Nobel Prize winner Roger Penrose, Lawrence Krauss and other world famous physicists.
@JakeEssex
@JakeEssex Жыл бұрын
@@abelochoa584 shut up, talking nonsense 🤣🤣🤣 my guys tryna say atoms are conscious, and you agree👀🤣🤣 embarrassing
@d3rduck
@d3rduck Жыл бұрын
FOR YOU SIR
@normanthrelfall2646
@normanthrelfall2646 Жыл бұрын
Good News but not common knowledge Mr Josh Timonen helped Richard Dawkins with his website and he also helped him produce documentaries and sell merchandise. Josh Timonen had been Richard Dawkins right hand man for many years and for this loyalty, Richard gave special thanks to Josh in his book “God Delusion” published 2nd Oct 2006, another invention of Richard’s carrying no substance but his opinions, fancies and whims, he further dedicated another book to him called “The Greatest Show on Earth” published on the 3rd Sept 2009. Richard’s interpretation of life. Mr Josh Timonen has today become a born again believer in Jesus Christ, this must have really hurt Richard Dawkins and his crusade against the God he hates without a legitimate cause. How that his books could not capture the heart of Josh, but when he truly came under the sound of the gospel, he became broken in heart and spirit giving his heart to the Lord. The Bible is the book of life. In the parable of the wheat and tares the servant came to the land owner saying did you not sow good seed upon your land, how is it that there are tares among the wheat. The Master said an enemy hath done this. The servant said shall I pull up the tares from among the wheat. The Master said wisely, let both grow together until harvest, lest you pull up some of the wheat with the tares. Josh Timonen appeared to be a tare but turned out to be wheat. Let us continue to pray for Richard Dawkins, that he will repent, for it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God! The Bible can seriously damage your health, so if you are an atheist or agnostic, don’t go near it as its truth is eternal in duration when it comes to spiritual truth manifested in the life of Jesus. Josh now believes in loving God and loving his neighbour as himself. What a wonderful change in his life has been wrought since Jesus came into his heart. The Bible is the book that the Chinese Communist Part fears more than any other book, because it tells the truth. The North Korean Communist Party fear the Bible, the Russian fear the Bible, in-fact all false religions fear the Bible and its content, because there is power in the loving words of Jesus to change lives. No other religion teaches thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all of your heart, mind, soul, spirit and strength and thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self. Jesus went further, if you want to be disciples of mine, then you must love your enemies, and as we abide in Jesus daily he enables us to love our enemies, something we could not do in the natural, but when the supernatural is allowed to be imposed on the natural then we are changed into new creatures in Christ. This is why Christians are persecuted and imprisoned for distributing Bibles and preaching the gospel of God’s love and wisdom through Jesus Christ. Fear paralyses communist countries and all false man- made religions. In short people are afraid of the Bible otherwise they would leave Christians alone. Many people read the Bible to find fault with it! A Pharisee named Ga-ma’liel a doctor of the law gave sound advice to the religious hierarchy in Jerusalem saying: Refrain from these men, and let them alone, for if this council or work be of men, it will come to nought: But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God [Acts 5:38-39]. What sound advice but they didn’t take heed. It is still the same today. Satanists in their temples and those involved witchcraft burn Bibles on a regular basis because of its contents. The devil and demons are consumed by great fear because they know that their time is short. The prophetic word will be fulfilled despite all the sufferings of Christians who have taken up the cross and followed Jesus to eternal glory.
@TheTrumpBoy
@TheTrumpBoy 6 жыл бұрын
That was a horrendous format for a debate moderated by a loud blockhead!
@nicolasvasquez7062
@nicolasvasquez7062 4 жыл бұрын
That wasn't a debate
@tommydawson7147
@tommydawson7147 3 жыл бұрын
He wasnt that annoying, the Format was bullshit, give them 10 or 15 minutes to explain
@shamanicrevolution2204
@shamanicrevolution2204 3 жыл бұрын
Literally. 90 seconds wtf.
@thomasshrum4006
@thomasshrum4006 3 жыл бұрын
@@shamanicrevolution2204 Lucky for Dawkins it doesn't take more than 90 seconds to point out bullshit.
@guichec3786
@guichec3786 3 жыл бұрын
a serious debate and chopra is an oxymoron
@beeguy300
@beeguy300 3 жыл бұрын
When Chopra speaks, I get the illusion that I understand what he is saying. When Dawkins speaks, I know that I understand what he is saying.
@Jessiejam-44
@Jessiejam-44 2 жыл бұрын
Chopra likes to hear Himself talk.
@kimbirch1202
@kimbirch1202 2 жыл бұрын
It is easy to say what folk already believe, but that doesn't mean those beliefs are correct. It is harder, but more profitable to challenge existing beliefs
@westonkienel4733
@westonkienel4733 2 жыл бұрын
@@Jessiejam-44 LoLkkjltaaly l 0alalaLLHLJKK0
@lieblingmike
@lieblingmike 2 жыл бұрын
The very definition of casuistry .
@dumont-art3971
@dumont-art3971 Жыл бұрын
That his, I say with kindness, because he speaks in the most base form. hHe speaks of the very averages of human experience. He speaks nothing of Knowledge or Gnosis.
@coolguy5772
@coolguy5772 8 жыл бұрын
I really wonder what Richard Dawkins was thinking while WHATEVER THE FUCK WAS GOING ON IN THE BEGINNING was going on
@MarcoScetta
@MarcoScetta 8 жыл бұрын
LMAO totally!
@kakashifuijin
@kakashifuijin 8 жыл бұрын
My thought exactly
@Piterixos
@Piterixos 8 жыл бұрын
I actually liked the music xD
@tigressnsnow
@tigressnsnow 6 жыл бұрын
KlaasDeKaasBaas They were hooked up to a translation device. You can see that black device in their ears.
@khjewels
@khjewels 6 жыл бұрын
Hilarious!! I thought I was on the wrong video!
@jerrysky4598
@jerrysky4598 3 жыл бұрын
The takeaway I got from this is just because science hasn't answered all the mysteries of the universe, doesn't give another faction the right to interject their particular guesses and call it a day.
@roscius6204
@roscius6204 2 жыл бұрын
you need to watch more theological debates, pretty much that every time.
@lazylenni1017
@lazylenni1017 2 жыл бұрын
Sums it up pretty accurately.
@charlesrump5771
@charlesrump5771 5 жыл бұрын
Deepak demonstrates the Theory of Devolution.
@jadenhalstead7290
@jadenhalstead7290 4 жыл бұрын
I think he is a perfect example of the Dunning-Kruger effect
@isaacleillhikar4566
@isaacleillhikar4566 4 жыл бұрын
Marc Driscoll was reading a quote about how people have their feelings hurt and complain about anything by Spurgeon. And says. "That's B.B before blogging. Totally different epoch in human devolution."
@bullymaguire2061
@bullymaguire2061 4 жыл бұрын
It boggles the mind... How can a mind like his have survived for so long lol...
@vishakhatripathi9608
@vishakhatripathi9608 3 жыл бұрын
dawkins was talking facts, but chopra was talking ideas--don`t compare the two
@trankt54155
@trankt54155 3 жыл бұрын
@@bullymaguire2061 The answer is,.....money.
@nullifidian13
@nullifidian13 4 жыл бұрын
I physically feel the pain of Dawkins in this debate.
@acpliego
@acpliego 3 жыл бұрын
I really don’t know how he accepted this.
@nullifidian13
@nullifidian13 3 жыл бұрын
@@acpliego mate everyone physically cringes when Deepak is involved... watch some other interviews/debates... he's such a scam artist
@codewalters
@codewalters 3 жыл бұрын
Seriously it was torture for him.
@peterbarker8249
@peterbarker8249 3 жыл бұрын
Q)⁸88⁸@@acpliego ⁷
@The_IND_Miyota
@The_IND_Miyota 3 жыл бұрын
Truly Dude
@danieldelanoche2015
@danieldelanoche2015 5 жыл бұрын
Deepak: May I ask you a question? Dawkins: Yes Deepak: *proceeds to ask 27 questions in a row*
@travispratt6327
@travispratt6327 4 жыл бұрын
Mathias Fernandes Duarte Coelho Well Yea cause there’s nothing wrong with deepak doing that, he can ask as many questions as he wants as long as it’s all the same point he’s getting at. It’s only if he brought up multiple unrelated points that it’d be considered a gish gallop.
@travispratt6327
@travispratt6327 4 жыл бұрын
Mathias Fernandes Duarte Coelho Oh, whats the meme?
@caballeromatias1992
@caballeromatias1992 3 жыл бұрын
and even so he does not understand why the one who reddens with shame is in the MATRIX
@2fast2block
@2fast2block 2 жыл бұрын
Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God.
@PROSCOPEGaming
@PROSCOPEGaming 2 жыл бұрын
@Mathias Fernandes Duarte Coelho Whats the meme? Tell us
@grkr8942
@grkr8942 3 жыл бұрын
I nominate Richard Dawkins for a sainthood!
@arivindharanbalakrishnan418
@arivindharanbalakrishnan418 2 жыл бұрын
I nominate ur mom's crack
@jefolson6989
@jefolson6989 Жыл бұрын
The irony!
@leftrightandcenternewslike5571
@leftrightandcenternewslike5571 4 жыл бұрын
Dawkins expressions are priceless when Deepak talks... Laughing my head off...
@realhumanbean7915
@realhumanbean7915 2 жыл бұрын
@Nisha chambiyal *BREAKING NEWS: PERSON DISCOVERS EMOTIONS AND SUBJECTIVITY*
@normanthrelfall2646
@normanthrelfall2646 Жыл бұрын
Good News but not common knowledge Mr Josh Timonen helped Richard Dawkins with his website and he also helped him produce documentaries and sell merchandise. Josh Timonen had been Richard Dawkins right hand man for many years and for this loyalty, Richard gave special thanks to Josh in his book “God Delusion” published 2nd Oct 2006, another invention of Richard’s carrying no substance but his opinions, fancies and whims, he further dedicated another book to him called “The Greatest Show on Earth” published on the 3rd Sept 2009. Richard’s interpretation of life. Mr Josh Timonen has today become a born again believer in Jesus Christ, this must have really hurt Richard Dawkins and his crusade against the God he hates without a legitimate cause. How that his books could not capture the heart of Josh, but when he truly came under the sound of the gospel, he became broken in heart and spirit giving his heart to the Lord. The Bible is the book of life. In the parable of the wheat and tares the servant came to the land owner saying did you not sow good seed upon your land, how is it that there are tares among the wheat. The Master said an enemy hath done this. The servant said shall I pull up the tares from among the wheat. The Master said wisely, let both grow together until harvest, lest you pull up some of the wheat with the tares. Josh Timonen appeared to be a tare but turned out to be wheat. Let us continue to pray for Richard Dawkins, that he will repent, for it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God! The Bible can seriously damage your health, so if you are an atheist or agnostic, don’t go near it as its truth is eternal in duration when it comes to spiritual truth manifested in the life of Jesus. Josh now believes in loving God and loving his neighbour as himself. What a wonderful change in his life has been wrought since Jesus came into his heart. The Bible is the book that the Chinese Communist Part fears more than any other book, because it tells the truth. The North Korean Communist Party fear the Bible, the Russian fear the Bible, in-fact all false religions fear the Bible and its content, because there is power in the loving words of Jesus to change lives. No other religion teaches thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all of your heart, mind, soul, spirit and strength and thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self. Jesus went further, if you want to be disciples of mine, then you must love your enemies, and as we abide in Jesus daily he enables us to love our enemies, something we could not do in the natural, but when the supernatural is allowed to be imposed on the natural then we are changed into new creatures in Christ. This is why Christians are persecuted and imprisoned for distributing Bibles and preaching the gospel of God’s love and wisdom through Jesus Christ. Fear paralyses communist countries and all false man- made religions. In short people are afraid of the Bible otherwise they would leave Christians alone. Many people read the Bible to find fault with it! A Pharisee named Ga-ma’liel a doctor of the law gave sound advice to the religious hierarchy in Jerusalem saying: Refrain from these men, and let them alone, for if this council or work be of men, it will come to nought: But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God [Acts 5:38-39]. What sound advice but they didn’t take heed. It is still the same today. Satanists in their temples and those involved witchcraft burn Bibles on a regular basis because of its contents. The devil and demons are consumed by great fear because they know that their time is short. The prophetic word will be fulfilled despite all the sufferings of Christians who have taken up the cross and followed Jesus to eternal glory.
@phoenixj1299
@phoenixj1299 6 ай бұрын
Nothing is as laughable as Christianity
@davidbanner6230
@davidbanner6230 Ай бұрын
On August 2, 1776, sixteen American colonies declared themselves independent of British colonial Government. We can but wonder of what kind of a world we would be living in today, if this seemingly uneventful event, had not taken place? Would we today be using German, or Russian, as our native language? Would we have television, air travel, internet, international communications, and the levels of democracy we now enjoy, and so many other freedoms we now take for granted? America grew from that precarious beginning into the world power we know to which, had it never existed would not have been there to counter-balance the brutal rogue giant regimes that were to emerge in the following hundred or so years ahead…? The question is….was it just a coincidence, that the rise and development of the US, was just a coincidence at the right time, in the right place, of the right power, to protect the fragile idea of democratic freedom, when it was desperately needed? Or was it a preordained awareness of the evilness that was about to be inflicted upon a still - quite primitive - world…? Although some Atheists will sneer at the possibility of there being more to existence than just evolution, and we can never think beyond doubt that it may have been more than coincidence, we are left with such as ‘why did the Japs bomb Pearl Harber, when the carriers were not there? ‘Why did Hitler make the biggest mistake ever of declaring war on the US? So many things to ponder….
@yoursbadal
@yoursbadal 4 жыл бұрын
Title should be "Torturing Dawkins straight for one hour."
@PittsburghSonido
@PittsburghSonido 4 жыл бұрын
Seriously... Not only was Chopra insufferable, but the way this debate was situated ended up a total disaster. Takes 13 minutes for the opening question and it was such a boring question to boot. This was a meandering debate. One that I don't always like watching unless I have watched all of Dawkins's other debates on KZbin. lol
@souravsahoo1582
@souravsahoo1582 4 жыл бұрын
Dawkins is good but..not any best scientist..he is narrow minded
@sibadityapal1493
@sibadityapal1493 4 жыл бұрын
@@souravsahoo1582 Oh really? And will please elucidate on your judgment of Dr. Richard Dawkins, Professor at University of Oxford. Do also state your credentials in all their magnificence, because you must be very well-qualified and erudite to be offering a critique of Dr. Dawkins in a single sentence through the medium of an obscure KZbin comments section.
@souravsahoo1582
@souravsahoo1582 4 жыл бұрын
@@sibadityapal1493 he is not open minded..these people have a serious problem in accepting spiritual concept..deepak Chopra's words make sense..but dr. Dawkins is not open minded
@indomins_rexx7209
@indomins_rexx7209 4 жыл бұрын
@@souravsahoo1582 yep, every individual word makes sense, but when u combine them, they dont😂😂
@hiheloByby6902
@hiheloByby6902 4 жыл бұрын
" Oxygen has Emotions " __ Deepak Chopra
@sumairahmad9464
@sumairahmad9464 4 жыл бұрын
Dawkins has raped an amoeba . It told me in my transcendence . Arrest him - Depak
@bint-abdullah
@bint-abdullah 4 жыл бұрын
@@sumairahmad9464 😂😂
@raajkumar9030
@raajkumar9030 3 жыл бұрын
But oxygen is generated from conciousness but oxygen has memory and water has memory...its already proved....for anything which has memory,there should be fundamental orgin rite ?..
@tommydawson7147
@tommydawson7147 3 жыл бұрын
Thats true, you didnt see tha water experiment with words....
@anandhua.b4589
@anandhua.b4589 3 жыл бұрын
@@raajkumar9030 bruh
@KXSocialChannel
@KXSocialChannel 2 жыл бұрын
I've never heard so many words spoken with such authority but with absolutely no meaning or truth behind them. Well done for developing such a skill, Deepak.
@ConvictedFelon2024
@ConvictedFelon2024 3 жыл бұрын
Deepak's presence at the debate was an insult to Richard Dawkin's intelligence.
@pourushsirohi4091
@pourushsirohi4091 3 жыл бұрын
Intellectualism not intelligence.
@muchanadziko6378
@muchanadziko6378 2 жыл бұрын
@@pourushsirohi4091 whatever "intellectualism" is in this scenario And the OP meant "intelligence"
@FakingANerve
@FakingANerve Жыл бұрын
It was also an insult to his patience. How it survived intact is better proof of any mystical unknown than any of Deepak's bullshit screeds.
@troyano6548
@troyano6548 Жыл бұрын
Totally agree with you 💯
@qalat23
@qalat23 Жыл бұрын
I could only say thank you for sharing your thoughts. Richard Dowkin's is a light for all blind people of the world and Deepak is the one who sell beautiful lies.
@pablof6257
@pablof6257 4 жыл бұрын
42:20 Dawkins: "I shall not make an argument ad hominem. My argument is ad bullshitem." Priceless.
@ME-od8id
@ME-od8id 2 жыл бұрын
I know, yet his 'blood pressure' according to the snake oil salesman was needing to come down.
@Jessiejam-44
@Jessiejam-44 2 жыл бұрын
I think Chopra likes to hear Himself talk.
@hoenircanute
@hoenircanute 2 жыл бұрын
@@Jessiejam-44 Every word he utters is to form the audience, picking up on the slightest thing and forming his argument as it goes on.. Like George Galloway and all other DEmagogues, Alex Jones for that matter.. demagogues..
@gabrielalvarez5194
@gabrielalvarez5194 2 жыл бұрын
“Ad Ridiculum” fallacy demonstration
@SanSha2100
@SanSha2100 2 жыл бұрын
ad bullshitem, actually proves that, Dawkin was using ad hominem fallacy of science 101 yet again, and your liking it proves your love for abusing opponent because you know you cannot defeat him.
@floydcomstick5960
@floydcomstick5960 8 жыл бұрын
on behalf of the youtube community , let me rename this video to its correct situation "Footage of Richard Dawkins Being Tortured"
@itheangel8817
@itheangel8817 8 жыл бұрын
So fuckin true lol
@marciodasb5189
@marciodasb5189 7 жыл бұрын
HAHAHAHAH yes, please
@VkXGames
@VkXGames 7 жыл бұрын
Poors Dawkins :'v
@AmreshTripathi
@AmreshTripathi 6 жыл бұрын
Epic
@ruffelhouse561
@ruffelhouse561 6 жыл бұрын
Yeah, poor Dawkins having to deal with this pea brained maniac
@sergiomerino1434
@sergiomerino1434 3 жыл бұрын
31:28 When Richard inhaled and puffed the oxygen right out as a reaction from hearing the complete stupidity of Deepak was hilarious 😂 I understand Deepak is in a debate but pulling shit out your ass like that is worse than admitting your opponent is right.
@MrSkme
@MrSkme 2 жыл бұрын
Admitting your opponent right is a great thing. It means that you learnt something and it is something that requires great courage to do. Sheeple think that you lose when you admit your opponent is right but it is actually only then you win as the only way to truly win is to aquire new knowledge.
@deepmodex
@deepmodex 8 жыл бұрын
Poor Dawkins.. it s like arguing with a kid who is talking nonsense.. And people tend to applaud bullshit.
@vividhkothari1
@vividhkothari1 7 жыл бұрын
That applaud is really what annoys me the most. But I think it's just the environmental factor that makes people applaud after someone talks in that fashion. And even if 99% people think he is BS, 1% people applauding will make rest of them also applaud.
@arkadiuszjandylewski152
@arkadiuszjandylewski152 7 жыл бұрын
Yeah just like in history when someone proposed a spherical earth. People like you also laughed.
@adamkings3823
@adamkings3823 7 жыл бұрын
what you don't understand is not bullshit. you sir are a dummy
@roybecker492
@roybecker492 7 жыл бұрын
adam kings are you seriously implying that deepak is not a charlatan???
@madelena1234
@madelena1234 6 жыл бұрын
You are as inappropriate as the Vatican was when they burned Giordano Bruni alive in Piazza Farnese Rome, just because he said the world went around the sun. Dawkins worships at the altar of mainstream science. And you worship him as if he was a God who never makes mistakes. Dawkins is not a God. Dawkins is a highly intelligent man and one can admire his need to gain knowledge, but his anger and disrespect for those who "think" differently to him, besmirches his reputation.
@Neodipo
@Neodipo 7 жыл бұрын
Lmao that mediator needs to start hosting wrestling matches. Lmao what a hype man.
@MarlboroughBlenheim1
@MarlboroughBlenheim1 3 жыл бұрын
I’m not sure he had an understanding of the issues or languages being spoken.
@w9ill856
@w9ill856 3 жыл бұрын
I never thought that before you're right hahaha.
@leopardosss
@leopardosss 3 жыл бұрын
LOOOOLLLL
@antonioclaros156
@antonioclaros156 3 жыл бұрын
Richard Dawkins: We as scientist try to explain difficult things in a simple way so people understand , we do not us complicated jargon in order to confuse people. Deepak Chopra: I like to move it move it, I like to !move it!!
@chrisbennett6260
@chrisbennett6260 Жыл бұрын
thats a gross exaggeration you came in with as usual your prejudices that your very statement reflects and i am neither in one camp or the other
@Itsnickcherry
@Itsnickcherry Жыл бұрын
@@chrisbennett6260 lol nah he was pretty accurate
@normanthrelfall2646
@normanthrelfall2646 Жыл бұрын
Good News but not common knowledge Mr Josh Timonen helped Richard Dawkins with his website and he also helped him produce documentaries and sell merchandise. Josh Timonen had been Richard Dawkins right hand man for many years and for this loyalty, Richard gave special thanks to Josh in his book “God Delusion” published 2nd Oct 2006, another invention of Richard’s carrying no substance but his opinions, fancies and whims, he further dedicated another book to him called “The Greatest Show on Earth” published on the 3rd Sept 2009. Richard’s interpretation of life. Mr Josh Timonen has today become a born again believer in Jesus Christ, this must have really hurt Richard Dawkins and his crusade against the God he hates without a legitimate cause. How that his books could not capture the heart of Josh, but when he truly came under the sound of the gospel, he became broken in heart and spirit giving his heart to the Lord. The Bible is the book of life. In the parable of the wheat and tares the servant came to the land owner saying did you not sow good seed upon your land, how is it that there are tares among the wheat. The Master said an enemy hath done this. The servant said shall I pull up the tares from among the wheat. The Master said wisely, let both grow together until harvest, lest you pull up some of the wheat with the tares. Josh Timonen appeared to be a tare but turned out to be wheat. Let us continue to pray for Richard Dawkins, that he will repent, for it is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God! The Bible can seriously damage your health, so if you are an atheist or agnostic, don’t go near it as its truth is eternal in duration when it comes to spiritual truth manifested in the life of Jesus. Josh now believes in loving God and loving his neighbour as himself. What a wonderful change in his life has been wrought since Jesus came into his heart. The Bible is the book that the Chinese Communist Part fears more than any other book, because it tells the truth. The North Korean Communist Party fear the Bible, the Russian fear the Bible, in-fact all false religions fear the Bible and its content, because there is power in the loving words of Jesus to change lives. No other religion teaches thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all of your heart, mind, soul, spirit and strength and thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self. Jesus went further, if you want to be disciples of mine, then you must love your enemies, and as we abide in Jesus daily he enables us to love our enemies, something we could not do in the natural, but when the supernatural is allowed to be imposed on the natural then we are changed into new creatures in Christ. This is why Christians are persecuted and imprisoned for distributing Bibles and preaching the gospel of God’s love and wisdom through Jesus Christ. Fear paralyses communist countries and all false man- made religions. In short people are afraid of the Bible otherwise they would leave Christians alone. Many people read the Bible to find fault with it! A Pharisee named Ga-ma’liel a doctor of the law gave sound advice to the religious hierarchy in Jerusalem saying: Refrain from these men, and let them alone, for if this council or work be of men, it will come to nought: But if it be of God, ye cannot overthrow it; lest haply ye be found even to fight against God [Acts 5:38-39]. What sound advice but they didn’t take heed. It is still the same today. Satanists in their temples and those involved witchcraft burn Bibles on a regular basis because of its contents. The devil and demons are consumed by great fear because they know that their time is short. The prophetic word will be fulfilled despite all the sufferings of Christians who have taken up the cross and followed Jesus to eternal glory.
@juanmacaballero33
@juanmacaballero33 9 ай бұрын
Jajajajaj fantasia no !!! No pudiste escuchar por tus prejuicios !! Pero en todo el debate se noto la superioridad (en términos de consciencia) a favor de chopra !!! Me gustaria que debatimos al respecto !! Te parece ??? Es una pena que la mayoria de comentarios estén a favor de una ser completamente conectado solamente con su hemisferio izquiero, que parece mas una maquina que un ser humano Me gustaría saber que opina acerca del amor ? O la felicidad ?? Porque no debe tener ni puta idea. Como todos los que los siguen... Solo te sugiero una cosa: Investiga en profundidad a Einstein (uno de los mejores científicos de la humanidad) cuando le preguntaban sobre la existencia de dios, él siempre respondía que creía en el Dios de spinoza. lo que habla el científico spinoza es lo mismo que explica Chopra sobre la conciencia !! te invito a que lo investigues y lo escuches sin prejuicios en la mente porque eso te nubla tu receptividad. Y no solamente a Einstein y spinoza. !!! Investiga enseñanzas de Sócrates, buda y millones de científicos orientales !! Como nikola tesla hablan de la conciencia Investiga y Estos tipos son muchos mas que este chico Dawkins
@juanchymartin7824
@juanchymartin7824 8 ай бұрын
​@@juanmacaballero33Spinozq no era cientifico. Su Dios es la monada. La naturaleza misma en donde todos. Spinoza es el padre de gran parte del materialismo ya que dice que no me pertenece mi cuerpo sino que yo soy mi cuerpo. Ademas nosotros no podemos modificar la realidad con la mente ni esta es un completo fenomeno, porque sino por medio de voluntad podriamos cambiar dicha situacion de forma inmediata dicho elemento, critica ya hecha por Frege hace mucho. Dawkins tiene una de las teorias mas interesantes con los memes, despreciar a alguien de esa manera es ridiculo. Algo mas que lo diga Einstein no significa que sea verdad y a si vez el ayurveda sobrevive sobre bases hinduistas que no se encuentran en Spinoza como quedo ya claro.
@lawrencenjoroge
@lawrencenjoroge 3 жыл бұрын
If you close your eyes this sounds like a conversation between Richard Dawkins and King Julien from the penguins of Madagascar
@IEE-nc3jc
@IEE-nc3jc 4 жыл бұрын
It's really remarkable that Deepak can talk complete nonsense for that amount of time without having any regret 😂
@emmmanueeel
@emmmanueeel 2 жыл бұрын
He is making a lot of money out of it...
@abdulfahadabro5294
@abdulfahadabro5294 2 жыл бұрын
You are idiot and will remain idiot he is the one who trying to take you out from your idiotness.
@sudhak5057
@sudhak5057 2 жыл бұрын
Just because you don't understand something, that does not make it complete nonsense!
@asolomoth1066
@asolomoth1066 2 жыл бұрын
It does if the person saying the stuff doesn't understand it...
@respectfulgamer7232
@respectfulgamer7232 2 жыл бұрын
@@abdulfahadabro5294 Why don't you explain why he's an idiot?
@jabibgalt5551
@jabibgalt5551 5 жыл бұрын
Deepak: How many people understood what I was saying? [Crowds applauds] Dawkins: You're lying! That was sweet.
@franciscomirandahernandez7510
@franciscomirandahernandez7510 5 жыл бұрын
It was embarrassing... I don´t understand why many people who assisted to that event doesn't speak english even in a basic level.
@sinkec
@sinkec 5 жыл бұрын
Francisco Miranda Hernández Too bad you weren’t on that stage to enlighten us all with that stunning grammar of yours
@johnlawrence2757
@johnlawrence2757 4 жыл бұрын
Jabib Galt Dawkins should have been banned from media appearance for life for calling the audience liars: how dare he do such a thing.
@jabibgalt5551
@jabibgalt5551 4 жыл бұрын
@Ezio Auditore Why does it have to be about skin color? Maybe they just agree with him.
@jabibgalt5551
@jabibgalt5551 4 жыл бұрын
@@johnlawrence2757 Oh, the mind of an authoritarian. "He should've been banned from media appearance for life!" Are you THAT sensitive and dictatorial? If you can't handle a statement that accuses people of lying, you're what it's nowadays called a "snowflake". Moreover, it's revealing that your concern is not on whether the public were indeed filled with liars, but your concern is that Dawkins called them that.
@lopendepaddo
@lopendepaddo 8 жыл бұрын
An hour of Dawkins talking to a brick wall.......
@rayzhong8542
@rayzhong8542 6 жыл бұрын
lopendepaddo I would prefer that. At least it would be Dawkins talking all the time and brick walls wouldn't say any bullshit.
@joshuamitchell1733
@joshuamitchell1733 6 жыл бұрын
One brick wall says that we don’t know what consciousness is but we somehow know it originated from the brain (dawkins). Do you understand the contradiction in that belief??? That begs the question IF YOU ADMIT YOU DONT KNOW WHAT CONSCIOUSNESS THEN HOW THE HELL CAN ONE SAY FOR CERTAIN IT COMES FROM THE BRAIN?
@CristalTapioca
@CristalTapioca 5 жыл бұрын
I think the brick wall is Dawkins, not being able nor willing to comprehend Deepak, offending him and at the same time when he had a chance to make a question to him he pulled out a quote, like a fan, like he truly wants to understand him but his scientific formation limits his understanding
@shabztar123
@shabztar123 5 жыл бұрын
@@CristalTapioca if you think you understand the word salads deepak is famous for then ive got some bad news. Youre not even 1 10th as clever as Richard. Just stick to debunked conspiracies if you want to feel smart about something
@CristalTapioca
@CristalTapioca 5 жыл бұрын
@@shabztar123 what about salads? :s
@Matstarx25
@Matstarx25 3 жыл бұрын
Richard: My name is Richard Dawkins. Host: WOW! POR FAVOR un applauso.
@enekaitzteixeira7010
@enekaitzteixeira7010 Жыл бұрын
YA VES. Era híper exasperante. Por Dios, hasta ha pedido un aplauso cuando el charlatán de Chopra dijo que los átomos tenían imaginación... flipante.
@souviksarkar.7219
@souviksarkar.7219 9 ай бұрын
You reminded me of Juan Cervantes
@LesPaul2006
@LesPaul2006 9 жыл бұрын
"Atoms can think." Deepak Chopra.
@ErickRelentless
@ErickRelentless 9 жыл бұрын
LesPaul2006 That Phrase can be seen as the most smartest thing ever said, as well as the most stupid. But actually no one can prove that is right or wrong.
@LesPaul2006
@LesPaul2006 9 жыл бұрын
Erick Relentless Evidence strongly suggests it is wrong. They do behave weird allright, but not as if they could think.
@ErickRelentless
@ErickRelentless 9 жыл бұрын
You're right, there are "strong" evidence on both sides but nothing is proved.
@LesPaul2006
@LesPaul2006 9 жыл бұрын
Erick Relentless Not on both sides. The only "evidence" for the consciousness of atoms is Chopra's wishful thinking.
@ErickRelentless
@ErickRelentless 9 жыл бұрын
LesPaul2006 The double slit experiment it's a really good point to believe that atoms has some kind of awareness, also some of the conclusions of Shrödinger. In the other side we have the postulate of Decoherence that is enough strong to make you think that atoms are not aware.
@scienceofreality
@scienceofreality 6 жыл бұрын
Respect for Dawkins for being patient...
@ammarsiddiqui3602
@ammarsiddiqui3602 5 жыл бұрын
much respect
@r4h4al
@r4h4al 4 жыл бұрын
They were both patient.
@HAL-iv2kd
@HAL-iv2kd 3 жыл бұрын
@@r4h4al Chopra wasn't, because Dawkins at least knows how to make a point.
@badtuber1654
@badtuber1654 3 жыл бұрын
Dawkins is several lvls bellow Deepak inteligence, and the fact he does not respect the amazing Deepaks insights, drops him a few lvls more, or maybe he is doing his part on purpose for the debate. Dawkins logic -> "you have spoken "Word Salad Jargon" ,"ad bullshitem" . I have proven your argument wrong. " Then he claims to be all Scientific . LOL
@polaristrans
@polaristrans 3 жыл бұрын
@@badtuber1654 "Dawkins is several lvls bellow Deepak inteligence" LOL
@dream11paradise60
@dream11paradise60 6 жыл бұрын
This debate is like Richard dawkin say 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 then comes 10 Deepak chopra 1,2,44,59,70,99,a ,b c,d the comes XYZ
@katrhiknaidu1989
@katrhiknaidu1989 4 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂
@azap12
@azap12 4 жыл бұрын
Good summary
@asolarasolarasolar
@asolarasolarasolar 4 жыл бұрын
Great summary, fella' I'm getting the feeling that Derpak talked 3x more than Dawkins.
@cristianuribe412
@cristianuribe412 4 жыл бұрын
@@asolarasolarasolar But Deepak almost always loses the main idea of his arguments
@DocBree13
@DocBree13 4 жыл бұрын
no - because the components in your list are actually in order 😊
@eeshaduggal5047
@eeshaduggal5047 2 жыл бұрын
Each word Prof Dawkins says is so well thought out. Not a word wasted.
@confidential303
@confidential303 Жыл бұрын
That is because you are not capable enough to understand the higher materials. If I talk to a little kid do you like 1 ice cream or 2 ice creams, they understand that but If I am talking about How to add up Balance sheet of corporate organizations they blank out.
@charlescole645
@charlescole645 Жыл бұрын
It's ironic that the people who believe in mystical and magical things are more like the kid who enjoy and cares about ice cream while the actual scientists know how to "add up balance sheet of corporate organizations".@@confidential303
@normanthrelfall2646
@normanthrelfall2646 Жыл бұрын
A lovely sight every morning Every day I see a lovely sight: little girls and boys with their hats and coats on, holding mum’s hand and thus trusting them for guidance on the way to school. They also trust teachers for their education; that they are being taught Facts in each subject. These little children deserve to be taught the truth and not be indoctrinated with Darwinian Evolution. I have studied evolution for many years in the various fields of science, and you can trust me; that there is no credible evidence for the theory. I keep up to date with all the major developments. It is a bottomless pit; full of hidden assumptions which the general public are not privy too. Evolution is a library of theories trying to rescue the main theory continually; without much success may I add. Educating these young lives with this fundamental extremism will lead them down a path of self- destruction; into an immoral lifestyle. The truth is evolution is a Faith; not part of science. It is committing academic murder to teach that evolution is a Fact of science. It is robbing them of GOD-CONSCIOUSNESS. That is searing their conscience with a hot-iron to the reality of what is truly right and what is wrong. At best, evolution is a religious faith and should be treated as such in schools in relation to religious education. Am I your enemy because I tell you the truth I trust not?
@RohanRajadhyaksha
@RohanRajadhyaksha Жыл бұрын
Indeed. Deepak, on the other hand, dishes out an incoherent word salad and resorts to ad hominem attacks when he runs out of remotely coherent things to say. What a charlatan!!
@normanthrelfall2646
@normanthrelfall2646 Жыл бұрын
I have no respect for him because he disregards, ignores and suppresses evidences against evolution that call it into question. Genesis chapters 1- 11 is recorded in Chinese pictographs which are silent witnesses of events, these are rather like fingerprints of historical facts that took place, being historical in character not forgeries. Evolutionists believe everything is a forgery if it calls evolution into question, we must not go against this world religion of Darwinian Origins for it is a sacred cow. We must ignore, suppress and disregard any evidence that calls evolution into question. The pictographic clues to our ancient past have remained in hidden view for thousands of years. There is evidence of antiquity which is undeniable, but evolutionists will always remain arrogant and defiant to the reality of this evidence. The question is: Where did the Chinese picture concepts come from? Concepts that are memorialized in ancient Chinese pictographs and why do these figures match the Genesis account. Many Chinese people who were former communists have recognized the historical account in Genesis in their pictographic ancient language and have turned to Christ for salvation, knowing that their for bearers had knowledge of their migration from the Tower of Babel. These are just three pictographs as examples and there are others for those who want to do their own research. Noah’s Flood is mentioned in pictographic evidence particularly where the symbol for eight is concerned, because eight persons entered the Ark. It doesn’t matter what evidence points towards Creation, fall, Flood and redemption through the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ, evolutionists as goats will still head-butt the evidence, such as andesite stones carved with dinosaurs on them found in Nazca tombs in the desert with patina on them which takes thousands of years to form, speaking of antiquity. Dr Dennis Swift through this evidence he discovered doing excavations, turned him 360 degrees from an evolutionist to a creationist. Dinosaur figurines which are quite numerous in Mexico were studied by Dr Don Patton and were found to be genuine. See you-tube. The evidence is clear that the indigenous Indians lived alongside dinosaurs a few thousand years ago. They did not die out 65 million years ago, this is purely a religious concept. The Turin Shroud depicting Jesus crucified was produced, when the fire of God’s presence raised him from the dead, leaving a negative impression on the shroud which scientists have tried to reproduce, in order to prove it a forgery. When the Lord’s body was exposed to God’s light, just like film being exposed in a camera to light, it produced a negative. In all these things God has not left us without his divine witness of events.
@johnbwill
@johnbwill 4 жыл бұрын
Me: What time is it? Chopra: "the universe is made of stardust. Stardust is a by-product of the disassembly of stars. Dark matter surrounds and fills the void between star-dust particles, which we call the atomic nature of the universe. The universe therefore, is pregnant with time. Time is an emergent product of consciousness, which in itself is a wave form. Wave forms are non-dual in nature and once we observe them, we change their behaviour. So time itself changes depending on who is observing it. Me: fuck, I'm late.
@PittsburghSonido
@PittsburghSonido 4 жыл бұрын
lmaooooo
@02nf2i
@02nf2i 3 жыл бұрын
That was fucking deep. I am forming a religion and what you just wrote is my sacred scripture.
@johnbwill
@johnbwill 3 жыл бұрын
@@02nf2i Thusly, it began!
@The_IND_Miyota
@The_IND_Miyota 3 жыл бұрын
Hilarious.. 😂😂😂
@khalilkafieh8099
@khalilkafieh8099 5 жыл бұрын
Deepak literally doesn’t make any arguments he just keeps adding more meaningless bullshit while making sure to throw in words he doesn’t understand.
@afireinside0
@afireinside0 9 жыл бұрын
Deepak es el rey del uso del Ad Hominem, mejor llamémoslo "Ad Bullshitem", pero a la inversa, intentando dar crédito a lo que dice fardando de sus trabajos, publicaciones y reseñas. El hecho de que trabaje con otros científicos no implica que lo que dice es cierto. No entiendo cómo siendo médico y pudiendo haber dedicado su carrera a hacer verdadera ciencia se dedica a mezclar miles de ámbitos que nada tienen que ver, metiendo "cuántico" por allí, "evolución" por allá, "conciencia", "condicionamiento", ¿HOLA? Pobre Richard, menuda paciencia tuvo que tener para no levantarse de la silla e irse ante tanta tontería, eso antes de sufrir un infarto
@tayanedepaula7123
@tayanedepaula7123 9 жыл бұрын
best comment I've read so far, that was exactly what I thought when I was watching the debate haha
@gilanin
@gilanin 9 жыл бұрын
Lo más escalofriante de este individuo (Chopra) es que él tiene un apelo convincente para personas que creen que son inteligentes o personas que no tienen cierto conocimiento científico. Tienes toda la razón acerca del juego de palabras que usó, pero eso sólo convence a personas que no tienen mucho conocimiento. Deepak es una persona despreciable y lo más triste es que si ellos dos tienen un debate en cualquier país latinoamericano o muy religioso (combinado con ignorancia o cierta falta de educación), Chopra ganaría el debate.
@afireinside0
@afireinside0 9 жыл бұрын
gilanin A mí me aterra precisamente por eso, porque dependiendo del público gana el debate ampliamente, y encima cuando logra convencer a la gente ya es difícil sacarles de ahí. Viendo un programa de Oprah donde le invitaban y le escuchaban como el rey de la sabiduría, con un público de miles de personas ovacionándole, con la presentadora dándole bombo y alentándole, con Lady Gaga diciendo "es la persona más importante de mi vida"... (literalmente, está en KZbin), me di cuenta de lo serio que es esto. Es una pena este personaje, es que encima tiene éxito y convence a gente que a la vez influencian a muchísimas personas. Es muy importante tener un espíritu crítico y alentar a los demás a que hagan lo mismo... Por suerte queda gente para rebatirle y dejarle en evidencia.
@gilanin
@gilanin 9 жыл бұрын
Oh el horror! Ví uno de sus debates en CalTech (abc NEWS) contra Harris y Shermer. La gente se reía de Chopra como si fuese un payaso. Y en este video la gente le aplaude. No me sorprende que personas en países más avanzados que, por ejemplo, la mayoría de los países subdesarrollados piensan que somos monos. Aquí el moderador se pregunta como es posible que teniendo la misma formación académica pueden estos dos llegar a conclusiones tan diferentes. Primero que todo, ni siquiera personas del mismo campo de estudio que Chopra (medicina) apoyan sus ideas. Sería difícil encontrar un científico respetable que lo soporte. La misma formación académica no quiere decir que las ideas que resulten tengan la misma validez. Por eso es que las teorías se ponen a prueba, y cuando no se puede negar la validez es cuando se aceptan. Pero Chopra no es más que un charlatán.
@Matricula404
@Matricula404 9 жыл бұрын
afireinside0 Totalmente de acuerdo contigo, Deepak como Jaime Mausán mezclan de aquí y de allá, lo envuelven con un alo misterioso-científico-espiritual, y les sale un champurrado que venden a mucha gente ingenua. En fin, se rajó al último. Quizá la conciencia de cada uno de sus átomos le gritó: "córrele o te darán otro revolcón". Pero seguirá, porque su verborrea le deja muuuuucho dinero.
@MikkoVille
@MikkoVille 2 жыл бұрын
I am truly baffled that some (or very many, apparently) find Deepak Chopra somehow wise and intelligent.
@gigachama
@gigachama 5 жыл бұрын
They have headphones in the audience, so I'm assuming they're translating it as they go. I wonder how the translators translate Chopra's word salads. Must be a complete headache.
@goatamongsheep4296
@goatamongsheep4296 4 жыл бұрын
The english 'translation' is flawed = not accurate; and they are speaking ENGLISH. I can just imagine how many errors there must be in translation to another language.
@Kevin-ul8ux
@Kevin-ul8ux 3 жыл бұрын
Or maybe it's really easy to translate nonsense. Just say a bunch of words in another language that, together, make no sense.
@malayneum
@malayneum 4 жыл бұрын
if you close your eyes, this is a debate between Dawkins and the Lemur in Madagascar.
@juleslu8403
@juleslu8403 3 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@matwatson7947
@matwatson7947 3 жыл бұрын
It's so true. I closed my eyes after reading this comment. Hilarious
@ericksoledispa2726
@ericksoledispa2726 3 жыл бұрын
Hahahaahhahaah
@internationalrtg5602
@internationalrtg5602 2 жыл бұрын
Best comment 😂
@Jaithesaintt
@Jaithesaintt 2 жыл бұрын
Waiting for parking the past hour. ANGRY. Lmao. And now I’m cracking TF UP 😂😂😂😂
@anshiman
@anshiman 10 жыл бұрын
Chopra's logical fallacies: - Ad verecundiam - Ad ignorantium - Ad bullshitem
@howardginsberg2598
@howardginsberg2598 3 жыл бұрын
Ad crapidum
@dottalks8156
@dottalks8156 3 жыл бұрын
Ad monetizatium Ad HD Ad vent Ad herence
@MarkusAxunIllianus
@MarkusAxunIllianus 2 жыл бұрын
Deepak: I explain something I hardly understand with something I do not understand at all.
@uzumakitak1109
@uzumakitak1109 9 жыл бұрын
"I'm gonna put 'quantum' in every sentence and that will make it scientific"-Deepak Chopra. "Voy a poner 'cuántico' en cada oración y eso lo hará científico"-Deepak Chopra.
@usmanazam449
@usmanazam449 3 жыл бұрын
I like how u translated that
@renzosanchezfalcon8885
@renzosanchezfalcon8885 3 жыл бұрын
aea otaku
@sankalp2520
@sankalp2520 3 жыл бұрын
Why'd you write it twice? Why did you write it twice?
@OrangeUtan1
@OrangeUtan1 2 жыл бұрын
"Do you guys just put the word quantum in front of everything? "
@juanmacaballero33
@juanmacaballero33 9 ай бұрын
Jajajajaj no pudiste escuchar por tus prejuicios !! Pero en todo el debate se noto la superioridad (en términos de consciencia) a favor de chopra !!! Me gustaria que debatimos al respecto !! Te parece ??? Es una pena que la mayoria de comentarios estén a favor de una ser completamente conectado solamente con su hemisferio izquiero, que parece mas una maquina que un ser humano Me gustaría saber que opina acerca del amor ? O la felicidad ?? Porque no debe tener ni puta idea. Como todos los que los siguen... Solo te sugiero una cosa: Investiga en profundidad a Einstein (uno de los mejores científicos de la humanidad) cuando le preguntaban sobre la existencia de dios, él siempre respondía que creía en el Dios de spinoza. lo que habla el científico spinoza es lo mismo que explica Chopra sobre la conciencia !! te invito a que lo investigues y lo escuches sin prejuicios en la mente porque eso te nubla tu receptividad. Y no solamente a Einstein y spinoza. !!! Investiga enseñanzas de Sócrates, buda y millones de científicos orientales !! Como nikola tesla hablan de la conciencia Investiga y Estos tipos son muchos mas que este chico Dawkins
@nabils9837
@nabils9837 6 жыл бұрын
27:10 "you're lying" LOL I love Dawkins' brute responses
@LucasBatistussi
@LucasBatistussi 5 жыл бұрын
Nabil Saleh I love that moment
@ddsgabo
@ddsgabo 4 жыл бұрын
I think Richard was just tired of so much ignorance and got frustrated.
@briansmith3791
@briansmith3791 4 жыл бұрын
@Nabil S : 79 likes for a comment that 'loves' Dawkins calling ordinary people liars! He is publicly showing his contempt for those of us who are not of the 'elite', who didn't attend Oxbridge, Harvard, Yale etc, and 79 people applaud this? To paraphrase George Carlin, 'Wake up, it's a big elitist club and YOU ain't in it.'
@HAL-iv2kd
@HAL-iv2kd 3 жыл бұрын
@@briansmith3791 Shut the fuck up, you willing ignorant
@yourfriendlyneighborhoodsa9058
@yourfriendlyneighborhoodsa9058 3 жыл бұрын
@@HAL-iv2kd Shut the fuck up you unwilling ignorant!!!
@dmosier
@dmosier 10 жыл бұрын
Doctor Dawkins has way more patients than I do. I can barely listen to Deepak...he is frustratingly deep down his own rabbit hole.
@steverobertson1358
@steverobertson1358 10 жыл бұрын
YEH, DAVID, GLAD U POSTED THIS ARTICLE. IM GOING TO BE BRIEF, CUZ I HATE TEXTING. JUST A COUPLE OF POINTS: DEEPAK CHOPRA IS A BLATANT FRAUD! CHOPRAs ONLY REAL CAUSE OR INTENT IS COLD HARD CASH! THE ENTIRE PRODUCTION WAS BOUGHT & PAID BY CHOPRA! DOCTOR DAWKINS ONLY GOT SECONDS TO PRESENT LEGITEMANT FACTS. HE WAS INTERRUPTED EVERYTIME HE TRIED TO MAKE A POINT! PLEASE, IF ANY OF DAVIDS FOLLOWERS HAVE GOT CAUGHT UP OR BOUGHT ANY OF CHOPRAs BOOKS, PLEASE DONT BUY ANY MORE LITERATURE FROM CHOPRA
@dmosier
@dmosier 10 жыл бұрын
steve robertson I agree. He is no dummy. He knows where his money comes from.
@steverobertson1358
@steverobertson1358 10 жыл бұрын
THIS IS A MASSIVE PROBLEM ALL ACROSS THE PLANET...THESE FALSE PROFITS & THERE UTTER MADNESS THEY PREACH! BEST EXAMPLE JUST HOW FUCKING SERIOUS THIS PROBLEM IS....JUST WATCH FOX NEWS FOR JUST 10 SECONDS
@edwardmurdoch5070
@edwardmurdoch5070 10 жыл бұрын
As I came back to this video to make a comment, I noticed your post again (which I have already thumbed up in a previous occasion). To be able to make my previously mentioned response, first I had to stop the video: Deepak was ranting about consciousness and unconsciousness. I did it just in time. I was only a few seconds from jumping out of my window to my certain, yet liberating death!!! lol
@andyrational8891
@andyrational8891 10 жыл бұрын
steve robertson "THESE FALSE PROFITS" I think Deepak Chopra makes a lot of "true profits", how else he is able to pay for the fancy glasses.
@alancoellopilay
@alancoellopilay 3 жыл бұрын
Excellent comments and arguments by Richard Dawkins.
@alainmaitre2069
@alainmaitre2069 7 ай бұрын
By both of them .
@Lu5ck
@Lu5ck 9 жыл бұрын
i am not a science person but it seems like deepak is talking about many different things including way of life to prove his points while dawkins using accurate honest words to explain facts
@0oMag
@0oMag 6 жыл бұрын
Lu5ck what did Dawkins actually explain? Specifically? All I heard was that he can't actually prove anything.
@madelena1234
@madelena1234 6 жыл бұрын
Dawkins is not able to comprehend Deepak, as you are not either.
@BlueFury2577
@BlueFury2577 5 жыл бұрын
@@madelena1234 That's because Deepak isn't saying anything of substance. You're just easily fooled by the sciency words sprinkled at random in his sentences.
@Elintasokas
@Elintasokas 5 жыл бұрын
@@0oMag You don't have to falsify nonsense for it to be nonsense. All Deepak did was spit out unfalsifiable, nonsensical claims one after another. I could say there's invisible magic god stuff flying in the air that controls our subconscious minds. Does that mean it's rational to believe in such a thing just because you can't prove me wrong? Hell no.
@0oMag
@0oMag 5 жыл бұрын
@@Elintasokas how is that in any way shape or form coherent to my question?
@lincolnsixecho1947
@lincolnsixecho1947 6 жыл бұрын
I loved when doctor Dawkins said "I shall not make an argument ad hominem. My argument is ad bullshitem".
@andrewconnell3653
@andrewconnell3653 4 жыл бұрын
At minute 42
@Nokapp23
@Nokapp23 4 жыл бұрын
No. See www.quora.com/Are-atoms-sentient. And there are others too
@briansmith3791
@briansmith3791 4 жыл бұрын
@LincolnSixEcho: Dawkins exhibiting his usual arrogance. People with deep belief systems simply cannot comprehend someone who disagrees with them. They think they're either liars or morons. I've had painful experience of this. About 16 years ago, i visited a long-time friend. An atheist, whom i had respected as a mentor for 25 years. During our conversation, i mentioned scientists had recently discovered something called 'Dark Matter' and i told him what i had read in New Scientist about it. He made a 'sour' face. When i laughingly asked him "why the look, do you think i'm telling lies?" he said "yes." I left his home that day and have not spoken to him since. A good man threw his closest friend in the bin with one word, because he refused to accept facts that he thought would affect his materialist beliefs. Dawkins falsely called Chopra a liar, said an eminent physicist was wrong without evidence, even called the audience liars, for the same reason my ex-friend called me a liar.
@shinobiexmuslimatheistapis5867
@shinobiexmuslimatheistapis5867 3 жыл бұрын
@@briansmith3791 This is the problem with Hinduism the caste system is ingrained in its identity. Just like deepak kept trying to use argumentum ad verecundiam or appeal to authority fallacy a number of times in his arguments the basic sadhu/guru/pandit does the same the only difference is deepak is trying to keep Hinduism relevant to educated Indians while the sadhu/guru/pandit scams the uneducated Indian masses. The similarity is that both want to keep people ignorant by filling their minds and time with spiritual and metaphysical bullshit. It is to conform with hindu society and appear knowledgeable with in any group even if your the most ignorant person their is. Abrahamic religions have one cult. In hinduism every brahmin or pseudointellectual can create confusion and his very own cult. The scientists who do not pay attention to religion like Carl Sagan and Neil Degrasse Tyson. Who don't want people to remain ignorant due to their religious believes try to reach as large an audience as possible. They know the evils of Christianity and Islam. They do not know the disease of spreading any and all ignorant beliefs in Hinduism. It can be rewritten to fool anybody. Hinduism is like liquid poison. you put in a bottle it will become the bottle. you put it in a glass it will become a glass. changing it shape does not make it any less poisonous.
@natanaellizama6559
@natanaellizama6559 3 жыл бұрын
@@shinobiexmuslimatheistapis5867 I don't think so. Deepak made appeals to authority not in a fallacious way at all. He did not state "X said so therefore Y is true". He's appealing to authority because Dawkins stated that he was stating incomprehensible word salads, while he was stating views by prominent scientists, so even if he were wrong in his belief it would not be a bullshit belief. If you want fallacies speak of Dawkins who DID make ad hominems.
@massivemikeh
@massivemikeh 4 жыл бұрын
Deepak Chopra sounds just like King Julian! Yes, from Madagascar. Lol
@dizastavina
@dizastavina 4 жыл бұрын
Legendary
@carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523
@carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523 3 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@thetruthalwaysscary
@thetruthalwaysscary 2 жыл бұрын
If there is a great example of woo woo science, Deepak Chopra is the champion. His strategy is that he takes real science facts and mix it up fill up with words and explanations that sounds like a well educated articulate person. There are lot of people like a part that audience who declare that they understand. "the Emperor has no clothes" phenomena. Everybody wants to be smart and while they have no idea what he talks about, they do understand some of the words and would never admit they do not understand the entirety. They can't understand since it a nonsense made up to impress and earn money / benefits from society. If you oppose such, they will tell you nthat the emperor does wear clothes you just not as educated or sophisticated as they are to see it. Hilariously dark age mentality.
@MarioDemaria110
@MarioDemaria110 10 ай бұрын
I agree on everything but i think bullshitters have existed throghout human history
@DeepakJAT0007
@DeepakJAT0007 9 ай бұрын
Right on !
@thetruthalwaysscary
@thetruthalwaysscary 9 ай бұрын
@@MarioDemaria110 of course, how do you think humanity created tens of thousands of religions and churches
@MarioDemaria110
@MarioDemaria110 9 ай бұрын
Exactly, its just that 'dark age mentality' that made me think you thought it was just a modern plague
@luismunoz2957
@luismunoz2957 8 ай бұрын
Tal cual
@astraestus8828
@astraestus8828 3 жыл бұрын
This was entertaining 🤣🤣 I don't know how Dawkins got through this.
@tsjayaraj9669
@tsjayaraj9669 6 жыл бұрын
If Quantum theory explained in Deepak Chopra's books worked , we could have seen him still young.
@mauriciocastaneda6097
@mauriciocastaneda6097 4 жыл бұрын
que comentario tan estupido
@carpev3938
@carpev3938 3 жыл бұрын
@@mauriciocastaneda6097 You're stupid.
@Pop-zb3wr
@Pop-zb3wr 4 жыл бұрын
I believe Deepak Chopra is some amazing troll. I think he is trolling everyone for a profit.
@kamakhyagatekanu
@kamakhyagatekanu 3 жыл бұрын
Agreed. He's great at his act. It's not easy debating people in front of large audiences while spouting random shit and making it seem like he actually believes in what he says.
@nathan-498
@nathan-498 3 жыл бұрын
He said dopamine and adrenaline are in superposition. I think it’s safe to say he’s a complete moron.
@w9ill856
@w9ill856 3 жыл бұрын
Time transcendent consciousness its experiencing the self for the observer cannot be observed thats the non symbolic awareness.
@leopardosss
@leopardosss 3 жыл бұрын
Disagree, i think he is trying to understand the universe through he´s own experience. Just as the rest of us
@shinobiexmuslimatheistapis5867
@shinobiexmuslimatheistapis5867 3 жыл бұрын
@@leopardosss This is the problem with Hinduism the caste system is ingrained in its identity. Just like deepak kept trying to use argumentum ad verecundiam or appeal to authority fallacy a number of times in his arguments the basic sadhu/guru/pandit does the same the only difference is deepak is trying to keep Hinduism relevant to educated Indians while the sadhu/guru/pandit scams the uneducated Indian masses. The similarity is that both want to keep people ignorant by filling their minds and time with spiritual and metaphysical bullshit. It is to conform with hindu society and appear knowledgeable with in any group even if your the most ignorant person their is. Abrahamic religions have one cult. In hinduism every brahmin or pseudointellectual can create confusion and his very own cult. The scientists who do not pay attention to religion like Carl Sagan and Neil Degrasse Tyson. Who don't want people to remain ignorant due to their religious believes try to reach as large an audience as possible. They know the evils of Christianity and Islam. They do not know the disease of spreading any and all ignorant beliefs in Hinduism. It can be rewritten to fool anybody. Hinduism is like liquid poison. you put in a bottle it will become the bottle. you put it in a glass it will become a glass. changing it shape does not make it any less poisonous.
@kevinsysyn4487
@kevinsysyn4487 2 жыл бұрын
I used to work with head/brain injured people, accident victims, embolism stroke... etc. I can tell you when you interrupt the chemicals in the brain consciousness is affected in every way. I've never seen an exception to this. So while I can't explain how chemicals produce consciousness I can tell you that.
@ricardocalderon1721
@ricardocalderon1721 6 жыл бұрын
Richard Dawkins thank you so much for your clear and wise comments.
@danielbastidas8109
@danielbastidas8109 4 жыл бұрын
I need Richard's patience
@laststrikestudios1839
@laststrikestudios1839 3 жыл бұрын
If we all had Dawkins' patience the world would be a better place.
@TheContrariann
@TheContrariann 3 жыл бұрын
True
@Being_Jeff
@Being_Jeff 2 жыл бұрын
Of the two which one showed the most patience to the others point of view?
@darkenergy8318
@darkenergy8318 6 жыл бұрын
Chopra fallacies : 1) Personal incredulity . 2) Composition fallacy . 3) Argument from authority .
@quotesofaeon9408
@quotesofaeon9408 5 жыл бұрын
I'm from India . I believe some thoughts of Deepak Chopara but whatever he's saying here is bullshit .
@tmpqtyutmpqty4733
@tmpqtyutmpqty4733 2 жыл бұрын
Deepak's ability to bullshit is almost an art
@Aisatsana1971
@Aisatsana1971 2 жыл бұрын
No kidding, it is lowkey impressive.
@juliannevillecorrea
@juliannevillecorrea 9 жыл бұрын
deepak chopra is unpleasant . richard dawkins is patient !
@spotserafin
@spotserafin 9 жыл бұрын
Ad hominem
@indianmilitary
@indianmilitary 9 жыл бұрын
julian correa there is a limit in putting up with atheist morons. Abrahamic religious faiths = fairy tales. Agreed but Hinduism = Quantum physics. Deepak chopra is talking about hinduism and its high philosophies from which quantum physicists got all their quantum theories and validated them mathematically and experimentally.
@spotserafin
@spotserafin 9 жыл бұрын
Dawkins is ignorant on Quantum Physics, Spirituality and it seems in philosophy. Don't let the blind lead you into blindness.
@juliannevillecorrea
@juliannevillecorrea 9 жыл бұрын
Sebastián Jácome please point out his " ignorance "
@Scottoest
@Scottoest 9 жыл бұрын
+Sebastián Jácome Yeah, everyone knows quantum mechanics is just the practice of spouting spiritual-sounding babble and throwing in the word ''quantum"" every now and then.
@jimmy90249
@jimmy90249 9 жыл бұрын
If you want to know about consciousness and Quantum Mechanics, you should watch a debate between Quantum Physicists, not a Biologist and an alternative medicine doctor.
@fihimafihi
@fihimafihi 4 жыл бұрын
Every time Deepak speaks universe sneaks behind the couch in the lounge and begs mercy!
@zerz4617
@zerz4617 Жыл бұрын
Deepak Chopra is not an idiot. This guy is a professional and amazingly talented gaslighter and conman.
@w9ill856
@w9ill856 Жыл бұрын
Troll he's a troll with a PHD
@mv3560
@mv3560 Ай бұрын
Chopra claramente sabe que la vida sin biologia no nos llevara a nada que tenga que ver con la evolucion natural de la humanidad, es cosa de ver en que estamos 2024, saliendo de la oscuridad!sin espiritualidad el ser humano no es nada
@davidbanner6230
@davidbanner6230 Ай бұрын
On August 2, 1776, sixteen American colonies declared themselves independent of British colonial Government. We can but wonder of what kind of a world we would be living in today, if this seemingly uneventful event, had not taken place? Would we today be using German, or Russian, as our native language? Would we have television, air travel, internet, international communications, and the levels of democracy we now enjoy, and so many other freedoms we now take for granted? America grew from that precarious beginning into the world power we know to which, had it never existed would not have been there to counter-balance the brutal rogue giant regimes that were to emerge in the following hundred or so years ahead…? The question is….was it just a coincidence, that the rise and development of the US, was just a coincidence at the right time, in the right place, of the right power, to protect the fragile idea of democratic freedom, when it was desperately needed? Or was it a preordained awareness of the evilness that was about to be inflicted upon a still - quite primitive - world…?
@lukekellerman3830
@lukekellerman3830 9 жыл бұрын
omg what is Deepak on? I want some. I'm surprised how Richard is so patient and not have a brain explosion
@GetToDaChoppa-k5r
@GetToDaChoppa-k5r 9 жыл бұрын
Deepak is a very intelligent and deeply spiritual man. Your just narrow minded to anything outside of the human brain.
@TajimaMunenori
@TajimaMunenori 9 жыл бұрын
"Narrow minded to anything outside the human brain". Why do people think that just by puting words together they've made a coherent, and logical sentence?
@GetToDaChoppa-k5r
@GetToDaChoppa-k5r 9 жыл бұрын
TajimaMunenori Are you the grammar police all of a sudden? BTW putting is spelt with two 't's'. Atheism is narrow minded to anything beyond overly complex scientific studies. You could never open up to anything spiritual because you think all human emotion is conducted by the biology of the human body, including the brain. There are many testimonials to enlightenment that science may never be able to fathom, especially through the lens of a microscope.
@TajimaMunenori
@TajimaMunenori 9 жыл бұрын
No, not grammar police, and thank you for pointing out my spelling error. Your previous sentence made no logical sense. As for your "enlightenment", it may give you a warm fuzzy feeling inside, but don't pass it off as a truth or fact. Science requires evidence and is always open to be disproved. Science is the same world wide. There are conflicting theories but never conflicting facts unlike religion and metsphysical hokum. But I will leave with your imaginary fantasy. I operate in the real therefore I will not be responding to you again. Say hi to Peter Pan and Santa Clause for me. Lol
@Sendobren
@Sendobren 9 жыл бұрын
no hassle i guess when all your arguments are based on mumbo jumbo you have to start using insults pretty quickly
@downswingplayer9712
@downswingplayer9712 5 жыл бұрын
It starts at 11:40
@hectormaestro2063
@hectormaestro2063 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you.
@d7dh523
@d7dh523 4 жыл бұрын
Thanx
@pprkt0
@pprkt0 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@nitinkrishna710
@nitinkrishna710 4 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@DocBree13
@DocBree13 4 жыл бұрын
thank you!
@Sfbaytech
@Sfbaytech 4 жыл бұрын
Never trust a man who wears a suit, tennis shoes and diamond studded glasses all at the same time!
@grv2569
@grv2569 3 жыл бұрын
There you go with that ad hominem fallacy
@TunezCottage
@TunezCottage 3 жыл бұрын
@@grv2569 that's not ad hominem. Ad hominem only applies in context of argument. There is no argument here. Stop applying fallacies where they don't belong.
@ale_ale_ale_ale
@ale_ale_ale_ale 3 жыл бұрын
HAAHHAAHHAA
@hotsauce153
@hotsauce153 3 жыл бұрын
@@TunezCottage I'm pretty sure he's mocking Deepak Chopra...
@baitman2368
@baitman2368 3 жыл бұрын
@@hotsauce153 Everyone with common sense
@MonkeyDLuffy4885
@MonkeyDLuffy4885 Жыл бұрын
Deepak Chopra is simply using the things which science has not yet been able to answer, but due to some reason Deepak is able to, LOL. Quite often during this interview he is so incoherent with what he is saying, instead I love the way Dawkins is answering using relevant knowledge and clearly accepting and expecting for the future science to answer these rather interesting questions, using Science😅
@NikkyKicks
@NikkyKicks 8 жыл бұрын
skip to about 3:26 to skip the crazy opening
@NikkyKicks
@NikkyKicks 8 жыл бұрын
11:36 is where the dialogue actually begins
@garygarcia05
@garygarcia05 8 жыл бұрын
I scrolled down looking for some comment like yours. Thx a lot!
@kozhedub
@kozhedub 7 жыл бұрын
My question is WHY
@kingcastaway07
@kingcastaway07 6 жыл бұрын
thank youuuuuu!!! you are a nice and lovely person xD
@magnified4827
@magnified4827 6 жыл бұрын
Nicholas Nace learnt some Spanish 😄😄 nice language.
@simay4977
@simay4977 5 жыл бұрын
Choprah and the Woo-woo again. I've never heard so many words being spoken without anything being said.
@vegeta1729
@vegeta1729 4 жыл бұрын
Very well said!
@mikedean5060
@mikedean5060 4 жыл бұрын
Try Kellyanne Conway and Sarah Palin
@DocBree13
@DocBree13 4 жыл бұрын
true - except for the parts where he was just plain wrong
@DocBree13
@DocBree13 4 жыл бұрын
A K this is all even worse than the crap Chopra sells - you are completely ignorant or just lying about all of the science you included - and the rest isn’t even wrong it’s so ridiculous
@MarlboroughBlenheim1
@MarlboroughBlenheim1 3 жыл бұрын
Find Jordan Peterson when he gets onto God. You’ll hear it.
@-yttrium-1187
@-yttrium-1187 8 жыл бұрын
I think darwin would rethink his theory of evolution as it wouldn't explain the regression of intelligence in this man called "Deepak"
@imserdar
@imserdar 7 жыл бұрын
-Yttrium- not every human evolved equally)
@pudurojo
@pudurojo 5 жыл бұрын
The change in genes is random, means evolution decides if it can preserve the change.
@tyshred9251
@tyshred9251 5 жыл бұрын
I cried I laughed so hard at this. Absoloutely.
@fadyfarouk8635
@fadyfarouk8635 5 жыл бұрын
I actually it would explain this.
@S3SSioN_Solaris
@S3SSioN_Solaris 5 жыл бұрын
Simple explanation. Deedik Chopra is only in it for the money.
@482jpsquared
@482jpsquared 2 жыл бұрын
I hope that Dawkins had the opportunity to read these comments to know the appreciation so many have for him. Yet, I assume he does and doesn't require the admiration.
@vpower7632
@vpower7632 4 жыл бұрын
Word salad. I never heard the term before but when I hear this Deepak spew, I understand the term without a need to have it explained.
@natanaellizama6559
@natanaellizama6559 3 жыл бұрын
He misused it. What Deepak stated was comprehensible. You may argue he was wrong, but it is blatantly dishonest and contrary to debate etiquette to call it 'word salad' just because he was unable to comprehend it. You can't argue with 'word salad', it isn't an argument, it is an ad hominem.
@phild249
@phild249 3 жыл бұрын
@The Iguana It's a get out for not having factual answers, a diversionary tactic to fill the time,and to convince those who don't understand that he was talking jargon.
@ThePookaHarvey
@ThePookaHarvey 3 жыл бұрын
@The Iguana Chopra is using scientific terminology in a way that doesnt make sense in the way that scientists define them. It's possible he has his own definitions for these terms, philosophers sometimes do this, but in such circumstances where your definitions differ to the widely accepted ones you need to explain what they are. Without an accepted definition of the words we use to debate one another the conversation has no meaning. Chopra never takes the time to define the special meanings he might be giving to these terms which would make the things he says make sense. In the most charitable light possible, he might well be making profound points, but the onus really should be on him to make them intelligable.
@jalsiddharth
@jalsiddharth 4 жыл бұрын
The number of facepalms RD had this session is the stuff of legend lol.
@vanshsharma9002
@vanshsharma9002 3 жыл бұрын
Rd sharma?
@BandytaCzasu
@BandytaCzasu 10 жыл бұрын
If you give any credit to Chopra, you really deserve being misinformed like this, and be squeezed of your money you pay for his books. Keep the good job, Chopra, the world needs mis-educated people to do waitering, toilet cleaning and the like.
@ikilledrogerrabbit1479
@ikilledrogerrabbit1479 10 жыл бұрын
Hahahaha that's true...
@paolocevallos1467
@paolocevallos1467 10 жыл бұрын
"Good-educated people" leads the world and see the results...
@matiassotolopez7843
@matiassotolopez7843 10 жыл бұрын
Paolo Cevallos Not really, that's misleading. The problem of the people that lead the world is that are irresponsable psychopaths out to plunder everything this world and it's inhabitants for all their worth to any cost. But the only cure is less ignorance of the common people, not more oscurantism(just to quote Dawkins on that last part).
@MikeNZ379
@MikeNZ379 10 жыл бұрын
Matías Soto López You assume that all believers are misinformed or some how deluded. There are many intelligent believers out there who have the right to have a faith or different point of view.
@ikilledrogerrabbit1479
@ikilledrogerrabbit1479 10 жыл бұрын
Michael Shell Being intelligent doesn't mean you are right all the time, and of course doesn't mean you can't be scared being fear the mother of all religions
@SamirSeth
@SamirSeth 2 жыл бұрын
Every time Deepak speaks we all become a little dumber. Then Dawkins tries to bring us back.
@romefox
@romefox 3 жыл бұрын
That intro is how Deepak interprets science.
@Michealgallardo98
@Michealgallardo98 8 жыл бұрын
my iq dropped drastically by listening to chopra
@MrDarkKobe24
@MrDarkKobe24 5 жыл бұрын
SadWolf but it evened itself out by listening to dawkins so you’re good
@fridjon13
@fridjon13 5 жыл бұрын
IQ is a definition of the intellect of the finite mind. Once you stop thinking and feel awareness you feel infinite intelligence beyond any limitation. "Thinking is a recycling of data previously absorbed." - Sahdguru
@anjanisingh7876
@anjanisingh7876 5 жыл бұрын
Because you cannot comprehend it intelluctually
@davidl.5335
@davidl.5335 4 жыл бұрын
@@MrDarkKobe24 Loloolololol
@Yousab_Menisy
@Yousab_Menisy 4 жыл бұрын
For me he sounds like he is talking nonsense
@TupacMakaveli1996
@TupacMakaveli1996 3 жыл бұрын
Man when I was younger I thought it would take me a while to understand deepak but as I grew and understood more (went to university) I realized it’s not important lol. I can literally skip but just listening to his keywords and move on to next line. Because the sentences have no meaning they are just built on keywords to make them sound interesting. Dawkins is legend
@drawbaguilkilju5804
@drawbaguilkilju5804 3 жыл бұрын
:D
@baitman2368
@baitman2368 3 жыл бұрын
lol
@ravenvalentine4919
@ravenvalentine4919 2 жыл бұрын
he just sounds like he knows soo much when clearly he does not understand anything , he is like a science book after a dog eats it and poops it and you try tor read the torn and chewed pages , all the words are there but they mean nothing
@helmutgensen4738
@helmutgensen4738 2 жыл бұрын
How did you manage such a terrible leap of faith? closing your mind so spontaneously
@TupacMakaveli1996
@TupacMakaveli1996 2 жыл бұрын
@@helmutgensen4738 took me 5 years. Wasn’t spontaneous
@LanguageImaginations
@LanguageImaginations 3 жыл бұрын
Poor Richard Dawkins. I couldn‘t have handled it 🤦‍♀️
@SweetComputing
@SweetComputing 3 жыл бұрын
I am in complete awe at how Dr. Dawkins tries to drive the audience back to the point comprehension from the jargon Dr. Chopra is throwing out there in quantum leaps in not so quantum quantity..
@2fast2block
@2fast2block 2 жыл бұрын
Really? Loser Dawkins puts you in awe? Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gJqwoq2ElL6Gjrc “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jWLCfHiMlqisl6M kzbin.info/www/bejne/r4icmJStr79_qc0 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpXEooarqdlol9k No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jmjLY3uNmLmql5Y Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.”
@SanSha2100
@SanSha2100 2 жыл бұрын
In simple word you are saying that you HATE deepak and have no interest in scientific exploration.
@luisferreira6189
@luisferreira6189 2 жыл бұрын
@@SanSha2100 deepak engages in a quasi scientific illusion and speculation it is not a sound evidence based scientific method
@MistaaPep
@MistaaPep 2 жыл бұрын
@@SanSha2100 WHATTTTT
@kimbirch1202
@kimbirch1202 2 жыл бұрын
Some folk are willing to believe what they are told to believe by science, although they have no.direct personal evidence, in just the same way that some believe everything they are told to believe by religion. Don't have any blind beliefs, but keep an open mind.
@UltimateSteevil
@UltimateSteevil 8 жыл бұрын
Deepak Chopra is the Donald Trump of debaters.
@UltimateSteevil
@UltimateSteevil 8 жыл бұрын
"donald trump makes sense". You're a gifted comedian i see. ;)
@UltimateSteevil
@UltimateSteevil 8 жыл бұрын
Have fun with your big walls. Hell, build them around everything. That's not the mentality of an infant or anything. The fact is? There has ALWAYS been different waves of immigrants, from the Chinese, to the Irish, to the Greeks and Italians, to the Japanese, to now Middle Eastern.......... and every time? There's been a Con Man willing to step in and Brag about having a lot of "easy answers" to appeal to stupid people's fears. It's a trick as old as time, and it always works. So 2 things? 1: Has any of the past immigration 'ruined america'? No, it hasn't. And 2: Where's YOUR family from? Because they weren't indigenous to America, were they? They came to America from elsewhere as immigrants. Fortunately for them? There was no loud fuckhead building a wall to keep them out at the time. Yeah?
@dreampiecefool
@dreampiecefool 8 жыл бұрын
whats the sense of that?? dont try!! ;) ure both idiots, u and mr feathers guy, and trumps in ure own way. :) u just wouldnt know it. like trump don´t know it :) cause idiots dont know theyre idiots. But they say these type of things u both say. just small idiots that need a bigger one to follow. do u at least wonder howcome u and a racist dum ass have things in common
@TheNoraa890
@TheNoraa890 8 жыл бұрын
+Mr Feathers Donald Trump and deepak chopra are rich con artist. Fooling everyone who follows them.
@UltimateSteevil
@UltimateSteevil 8 жыл бұрын
I gotta say 'dreampiecefool', i seriously can't make head or tail of what you wrote. It's kinda just a bunch of words that don't really apply to anything that anyone previously wrote.
@RenatusChristoph
@RenatusChristoph 6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Mr Dawkins, for your relentless Socratic urge to call out these mumbo-jumbo pseudoscientifical idiots and exposing their claim to knowledge when in fact there is none.
@briansmith3791
@briansmith3791 4 жыл бұрын
@Rene Xhristoph: That comment made me laugh. Comparing Dawkins to Socrates? The Greek was famous for saying he knew he didn't know. The Kenyan thinks he knows. Dawkins' arrogance is astonishing. To publicly call a man a liar when the man was telling the truth, to say an eminent physicist is wrong without evidence, to accuse his opponent of "willful obscurantism" is certainly not Socratic, it's the opposite, it's the actions of a closed mind. Read this famous quote from Herbert Spencer and then look again at Dawkins' behaviour in this debate. Spencer: "There is a principle which is a bar to all information, which is proof against all argument, and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance, that principle is contempt prior to investigation."
@RenatusChristoph
@RenatusChristoph 4 жыл бұрын
@@briansmith3791 Socrates would surely lose his temper with willful ignorants like Chopra and yourself - as you are inferior to all the interlocutors he faces in Plato's dialogues. None of them are putting forward theories nearly as obscure as this New Age bullshit that Chopra exposes here. "A single cell has consciousness..." "Atoms are sentient..." What is arrogant is the claim to truth (and ignorance for that matter). And that part I'll give you: Dawkins is not willing (as are all the modern scientific faculties) to examine his/their own theories. The theory of evolution is surely open to critique, but neither Dawkins, Chopra, you or any other fanatics are able to carry it out. So yes, Dawkins is arrogant, but at least he does acknowledge about consciousness that “of course, we don’t understand it”; "I don't know" (34:00;48:08). So does Socrates about virtue, justice, etc. If you don’t realize this about the Socratic arrogance then you haven’t read the dialogues well enough. The heart of the Socratic doctrines are not explicit in Plato's ouevre. They must be unlocked by a careful and patient reader. The claim to ignorance is at the very heart of what we call Socratic irony, which is found to be very arrogant by almost all of the interlocutors. After all, Socrates was said to be a philosopher - a lover of wisdom. But the ignorance has an implicit meaning which coerces a interlucutor who is driven by undoubtful, biased and close-minded truth-telling. He is ironic about his ignorance on account of this very purpose, I believe. The kind of irony where one understates and hides the fact that one has investigated a great number of opinions about something. The "Meno" is recommendable to read on this very issue. Read this and the “Theaetetus” and you’ll find a Socrates that knows a lot of things while dumbfounded and ignorant. And in the "Charmides" he even has a critique about whether one would be able to know if one didn’t. Surely, you haven’t read that dialogue, have you, Brian? Why that quote by Spencer? If you hold - as you do - that Chopra speaks the truth about consciousness here, then - surely - there is no need to investigate further into the matter. For the truth of any matter cannot be investigated, if one claims to possess it. You cannot look for something you have already. The other extreme: If one doesn't know anything about the thing one is searching for; then how would one realise it, if one would find it by chance. Therefore; some knowledge is always present; or rather opinions about things. Socrates has them, Dawkins has them, Chopra has them, you and I have them. Some are better then others. Chopra can - granted - express some things I would sympasize with. But he is fucking annoyingly arrogant. Even more so than Dawkins and that's saying a lot. For example at 43:40 he asks, if he can ask Dawkins 'a question'. The question - which contains at least 15 questions and the name dropping of 5 or 6 philosophers - ends at 45:18, where the moderator is forced to cut Chopra off. At 45:43, leaving Dawkins 25 seconds to answer, Chopra interrupts, now willing to 'ask' again, but gets denied by the moderator. That is just the very epitome of arrogant behavior. He is so full of himself.
@briansmith3791
@briansmith3791 4 жыл бұрын
@@RenatusChristoph: You are doing exactly what Dawkins did, namely insulting your opponent. Now I'M willfuly ignorant and a fanatic? A fanatical what? And it was the esteemed Physicist Freeman Dyson who said that atoms are sentient, though i wouldn't quite call him a New-Ager; he was 83 when he died earlier this year. The quote by Spencer refers to a closed- mind, obviously. Dawkins' closed-mind, and his inability to grasp that when someone disagrees with him it doesn't mean that person is a liar or stupid. And no, i haven't studied Socrates, and i really have no desire to.There are far too many interesting scientific theories to keep modern man occupied. In my opinion, science, not philosophy, will reveal the truth about the Universe. But i do have enough knowledge of the subjects discussed to understood what both Dawkins and Chopra were saying, when clearly you didn't. If you're put off by the thought that all this is New Age nonsense, then the Professor of Cognitive Science, Donald Hoffman, may help you to understand some of the stuff Chopra was on about. And i'm not a big fan of Chopra, his personality doesn't appeal to me, but at least he acted with some decorum. Dawkins acted like a lout. Chopra a liar, the audience liars. Shocking behaviour.
@RenatusChristoph
@RenatusChristoph 4 жыл бұрын
@@briansmith3791 You are a fanatic for holding that Chopra speaks "the truth" here, Brian. Short and simple. Modern science is born from philosophy, but you need to read philosophy in order to acknowledge that. Now I suggest you go read and take better care of that closed mind of yours. You clearly need to investigate the history of philosophy.
@RenatusChristoph
@RenatusChristoph 4 жыл бұрын
@@briansmith3791 To cut it even shorter: if you are ignorant of philosophy, you are ignorant of science as well.
@mouthofspaghetti7817
@mouthofspaghetti7817 2 жыл бұрын
One person is coherent, easy to follow and the other is Deepak
@2fast2block
@2fast2block 2 жыл бұрын
Lies to other liars can be easy to follow. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gJqwoq2ElL6Gjrc “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jWLCfHiMlqisl6M kzbin.info/www/bejne/r4icmJStr79_qc0 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpXEooarqdlol9k No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jmjLY3uNmLmql5Y Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.”
@davidsosa538
@davidsosa538 4 жыл бұрын
Dr. Dawkins has the patience of a saint
@ayoungconservative1051
@ayoungconservative1051 2 жыл бұрын
To him that would be an insult.
@SanSha2100
@SanSha2100 2 жыл бұрын
That is why he used ad hominem fallacy of science 101, several times. No saint or person with patience will use abusive language.
@tayyeb2590
@tayyeb2590 Жыл бұрын
The irony 🤣
@gabrielmaul
@gabrielmaul 10 жыл бұрын
Dawkins' credentials are amazing, Chopra's boil down to: ''He has sold a lot of books to a lot of idiots.''
@Aaggonet
@Aaggonet 10 жыл бұрын
These right here need to be the top comment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! thumbs up!
@gabrielmaul
@gabrielmaul 10 жыл бұрын
Thatty Stehli Thank you!
@gabrielmaul
@gabrielmaul 10 жыл бұрын
Aaggonet Tnx : )
@JacobNelson
@JacobNelson 10 жыл бұрын
Your arrogance is astounding.
@gabrielmaul
@gabrielmaul 10 жыл бұрын
Jacob Nelson Thank you, maybe one day my arrogance and ego will rival Chopra's
@db.sarvestani6554
@db.sarvestani6554 9 жыл бұрын
I hate the facilitator ,... why does he have to fckin scream
@erikkartman1213
@erikkartman1213 9 жыл бұрын
and the fucking Spanish-English transition is just ridiculous! The whole debate is in English, why the fuck was he speaking Spanish? If the audience didn't understand English, they wouldn't have understood the debate
@MrAlvarogame
@MrAlvarogame 9 жыл бұрын
Erik Kartman Also, he's pathetic at speaking English.
@trevorsimmons1768
@trevorsimmons1768 2 жыл бұрын
I have year 7 students with a stronger comprehension of matter than Deepak has. Still shocked Richard gave him the time of day.
@confidential303
@confidential303 Жыл бұрын
Trevor don't overestimate yourself. There are kids that knows more about this universe then you ever will be.
@JonasAnandaKristiansson
@JonasAnandaKristiansson Жыл бұрын
Matter does't exist. I feel for your students.
@charlesdolan3600
@charlesdolan3600 8 жыл бұрын
Richard Dawkins has the patience no one can match. He's constantly bombarded by the stubborn and irrational. Deepak just pulls shit from his ass and presents it as fact.
@sibusisodlamini5441
@sibusisodlamini5441 5 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@ammarsiddiqui3602
@ammarsiddiqui3602 5 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@martintraphagen3698
@martintraphagen3698 4 жыл бұрын
"Whoever knows he is deep, strives for clarity; whoever would like to appear deep to the crowd, strives for obscurity. For the crowd considers anything deep if only it cannot see to the bottom: the crowd is so timid and afraid of going into the water." This is the dynamic between these thinkers - you tell me who is who.....
@usmanazam449
@usmanazam449 3 жыл бұрын
Deepak is an idiot that i know
@baitman2368
@baitman2368 3 жыл бұрын
Nietzsche?
@2fast2block
@2fast2block 2 жыл бұрын
I can say this, Dawkins is a loser. Richard Dawkins teaches the universe came from "literally nothing." Real science says nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the fools resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We can't get anything from "literally nothing." We can't even get science without God. The laws of nature only can come from a Lawgiver, God. God is the reason for us and all we have. kzbin.info/www/bejne/gJqwoq2ElL6Gjrc “However improbable the origin of life might be, we know it happened on Earth because we are here.” -Richard Dawkins. We only get life from life...the law of biogenesis. We can't get anything without God. The odds are NOT there. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jWLCfHiMlqisl6M kzbin.info/www/bejne/r4icmJStr79_qc0 kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpXEooarqdlol9k No, the eye did not evolve into various eyes. Your mere chance mutations are absurd. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jmjLY3uNmLmql5Y Even Dawkins admits we can't know what is true because of natural selection... The God Delusion, “Since we are creatures of natural selection, we cannot totally trust our senses. Evolution only passes on traits that help a species survive, and not with preserving traits that tell a species what is actually true about life.”
@krazykirl1129
@krazykirl1129 2 жыл бұрын
That's profound! I have a nick name for Chopra, Deepcuck.
@2fast2block
@2fast2block 2 жыл бұрын
Krazy Kirl "That's profound! I have a nick name for Chopra, Deepcuck." I'm no fan of Deepak at all and I'm sure not a fan of dolt Dawkins. As I showed, he hates science.
@diegomedina6704
@diegomedina6704 5 жыл бұрын
Ojalá que al que pensó lo del cronómetro lo hayan despedido :v
@drvanhelsingz5133
@drvanhelsingz5133 2 жыл бұрын
Dawkins is an excellent and honest intellectual who truly respects his audience.
@jameswoodhouse1843
@jameswoodhouse1843 2 жыл бұрын
I find him rather arrogant
@riaklungmoita4923
@riaklungmoita4923 Жыл бұрын
Dawkins cannot answer questions from his opponent..
@drvanhelsingz5133
@drvanhelsingz5133 Жыл бұрын
@@riaklungmoita4923 bc they’re not intelligible. Sensible questions.
@FakingANerve
@FakingANerve Жыл бұрын
@@riaklungmoita4923 You misspelled his name. It's C-H-O-P-R-A. Just a friendly FYI.
@abelochoa584
@abelochoa584 Жыл бұрын
Dawkings can be called an intellectual, but never an honest person. His rampant atheism has engulfed his honesty. He lost the debate from the first to the last word. He's not an honest person.
@paulkiarie6538
@paulkiarie6538 3 жыл бұрын
"i respect scientist who use a simple language to understand,"i like that.
@MarlboroughBlenheim1
@MarlboroughBlenheim1 3 жыл бұрын
It was like watching an adult speak with a teenager for an hour on what it’s like to be an adult.
@sudhak5057
@sudhak5057 2 жыл бұрын
So who was the adult here?
@MarlboroughBlenheim1
@MarlboroughBlenheim1 2 жыл бұрын
@@sudhak5057 I thought you were serious for a minute.
@sudhak5057
@sudhak5057 2 жыл бұрын
@@MarlboroughBlenheim1 I am serious!
@SantaClaauz
@SantaClaauz 2 жыл бұрын
Presumably the one cursing and insulting is not the adult?
@MarlboroughBlenheim1
@MarlboroughBlenheim1 2 жыл бұрын
@@SantaClaauz the one who is a pigmy in the world of science and reason and who believes in non specific non demonstrable ideas
@OnlyNewAgeMusic
@OnlyNewAgeMusic 5 жыл бұрын
Atoms don’t have awareness - Awareness has Atoms :)
@danishsamir8807
@danishsamir8807 4 жыл бұрын
@A. G Atoms can't mind read.
@johnnyb2442
@johnnyb2442 2 жыл бұрын
You can't argue with stupidity. Once again, undefeated Dawkins keeps he cool. Love you Dawkins
@alexisvelasquez8987
@alexisvelasquez8987 Жыл бұрын
Defeated by Dr John Lennox.
@davidbanner6230
@davidbanner6230 Жыл бұрын
@ergonomover I stood in front of the skull of Sue, the T-Rex at Chicago's Field museum. It was a walk-in, Sue could engulf a standing adult human in one jaw-stroke, she had 50 10-inch teeth and jaw crushing-power of 2000 ppsi. Good thing humans and T-Rex's never shared the planet. Reply @davidbanner6230 Do you think it possible that their demise had purpose? How many millions of years did it take to evolve such creatures? Is nature so wasteful? And if so, is our annihilation just as tenuous, at the whim of a madman? Then life has no purpose, and evolution has no purpose, reason, or destiny? Then this would mean that Atheists are right, there is no God, and the Universe/existence has no purpose? Seems to me a mighty waste of time.....which also has no purpose?
@abelochoa584
@abelochoa584 Жыл бұрын
Rephrasing your words, if you love Dawkings you love stupidity, cinicism, vulgarity and impotence.
@johnnyb2442
@johnnyb2442 Жыл бұрын
Once again.. you can't argue with stupidity.. I rest my case..
@abelochoa584
@abelochoa584 Жыл бұрын
@@johnnyb2442 You don't have a case to rest.
@GEEBELBANDA
@GEEBELBANDA 8 жыл бұрын
Esto solo demuestra que la pseudo-ciencia es atractiva y de fácil propagación como un virus en las mentes débiles. grande dawkins
@dannymoon9985
@dannymoon9985 5 жыл бұрын
No entendiste? La conciencia es la madre de la ciencia y de la religión. La ciencia también es religión, Es la misma mierda las dos,
@jlbob8927
@jlbob8927 5 жыл бұрын
tarde o temprano la ciencia caerá en manos de un loco y el mundo se acabará
@robertoruiz366
@robertoruiz366 4 жыл бұрын
Ciencia y cientificismo son cosas diferentes. Dawkins es cientificista, no científico. No soy partidario de la psuedociencia ni del cientificismo, pero el CIENTIFICISMO es aún más atractivo para las mentes débiles, como la tuya, hermano. Cuántos libros de ciencia siquiera has leído?
@saul_zc
@saul_zc 4 жыл бұрын
@@dannymoon9985 vaya estupidez
@evaristopalma6553
@evaristopalma6553 4 жыл бұрын
@@robertoruiz366 Estoy totalmente de acuerdo richard solo se dedica a debatir, no es un verdadero científico ni lo puedo comparar edward tyson ,alfred wallace , francis collins , richard debate con curas o cardenales y se siente bien pensando lo hice de nuevo no oporta nada este tipo , como cuando trata de converser que la nada crea
@Mister.Unknown
@Mister.Unknown 4 жыл бұрын
"Evolution has a purpose. . . evolution itself". That folks is how you pinpoint a charlatan.
@natanaellizama6559
@natanaellizama6559 4 жыл бұрын
You're not understanding the point, I think. Materialists say that you don't need an intelligence in order to create complexity, yet, when asked to explain complexity they claim the natural laws, namely evolution. Yet, evolution is ordered, you can make predictions both retroactively and in the future, which is precisely what the theory of evolution is. It, therefore, has a directionality, and it's not hard to make the leap between ordered, intelligible directionality and purpose; if you think so, I would like to ask, what alternative seems more rational?
@mikenijboer1292
@mikenijboer1292 4 жыл бұрын
What makes me sad, is that some people in the audience applaud this Deepak. He uses the same tactics, biblethumpers use. Hide their bullshit, by saying science doesn't know it either. Consciousness is complicated, it takes hard work to really understand it, so most people don't know much about it and that's where Deepak lives. Only a little knowledge is enough to know Deepak talks bullshit
@natanaellizama6559
@natanaellizama6559 4 жыл бұрын
@@mikenijboer1292 I'm interested, I don't know much about Deepak, but what about what he talks is bullshit? Is it bullshit because it does not conform to a different tradition, culture, or mindset, or because it's known to be false? What specifically do you mean? I'm curious
@Mister.Unknown
@Mister.Unknown 4 жыл бұрын
@@natanaellizama6559 I will not begin to digress about the purpose of the universe or the gender of heaven angels. I said and reafirm that Deepak is a charlatan because does never speak linearly, but circularly. He has no clear introduction, main point, argumentation and closure. He speaks and speaks talking a lot without saying a thing, no cohesion except vague scientific terms barely holding together by the share disinformation share by the audience whose train of thought is "He uses big words, he must know something."
@mikenijboer1292
@mikenijboer1292 4 жыл бұрын
@@natanaellizama6559 he claims knowledge on things nobody has scientific knowledge about. In essence, he says you don't know, so I'm right and you can't proof I'm wrong. He can't unleash his mumbo jumbo on the theory of gravity, only on things science admits it doesn't know
@spotserafin
@spotserafin 10 жыл бұрын
Deepak is right about quoting Freeman Dyson. Freeman Dyson.: “It is remarkable that mind enters into our awareness of nature on two separate levels. At the highest level, the level of human consciousness, our minds are somehow directly aware of the complicated flow of electrical and chemical patterns in our brains. At the lowest level, the level of single atoms and electrons, the mind of an observer is again involved in the description of events. Between lies the level of molecular biology, where mechanical models are adequate and mind appears to be irrelevant. But I, as a physicist, cannot help suspecting that there is a logical connection between the two ways in which mind appears in my universe. I cannot help thinking that our awareness of our own brains has something to do with the process which we call "observation" in atomic physics. That is to say, I think our consciousness is not just a passive epiphenomenon carried along by the chemical events in our brains, but is an active agent forcing the molecular complexes to make choices between one quantum state and another. In other words, MIND IS ALREADY INHERENT IN EVERY ELECTRON, and the processes of human consciousness differ only in degree but not in kind from the processes of choice between quantum states which we call "chance" when they are made by electrons.”
@johnfaulkner5946
@johnfaulkner5946 9 жыл бұрын
then as Dawkins pointed out, if he believes that, he is wrong. There are many physicists who are, at the end of the day, batshit crazy.
@johnfaulkner5946
@johnfaulkner5946 9 жыл бұрын
Sure but the idea that consciousness exists in the universe free of the human brain from which it emerges, is just not compatible with the laws of physics. Some thing you dismiss outright, as supernatural.
@johnfaulkner5946
@johnfaulkner5946 9 жыл бұрын
What appears to be clear, and there will be no proof. only more and more evidence, is that consciousness is an emergent property of the neural activity in the brain. That is to say I believe we invent our awareness from moment to moment as a continuum of experiences, as our brains interpret the impulses it receives from our senses, we experience that as what is happening "Now". In a moment that experience is replaced by another, and stored, encoded, as a memory. Now and Then, strung together like pearls on a string... The string is our consciousness. All very cool, but nothing to suggest it can exist outside of the brain.
@johnfaulkner5946
@johnfaulkner5946 9 жыл бұрын
There is some evidence, every bit of consciousness we have ever found has been inside the brain of a living being. That's all the evidence we have I think. But there is no reason to ignore it.
@penizflaccidman3497
@penizflaccidman3497 9 жыл бұрын
that quote does not imply consciousness of an electron, unless we re-define what we mean by consciousness.... All that Dyson says is: there are complex structures like our brains that become aware of themselves are made of basic elements of Universe and this comes out of the chaos of quantum mechanics... Just look at what we were able to do with computers, but do they have awareness? No they don't. But why? It's because awareness is not just bunch of atoms, they have to be wired properly! For computers we are the driver of this progression, for human beings it was and still is Evolution! We do not know how consciousness comes to be! And Deepak acknowledges this..... and yet he moves on to explain it with atom sentience in the next breath :/ that is where Dawkins calls BS on this....
@gopi1618
@gopi1618 2 жыл бұрын
How did this Deepak Chopra get so many audiences throughout the world, it is surprising.
@positivesecret
@positivesecret 2 жыл бұрын
You have to have a soul to understand
The God Debate II: Harris vs. Craig
2:06:55
University of Notre Dame
Рет қаралды 12 МЛН
Richard Dawkins versus Rowan Williams: Humanity's ultimate origins
1:28:08
University of Oxford
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Офицер, я всё объясню
01:00
История одного вокалиста
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН
Will A Guitar Boat Hold My Weight?
00:20
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 261 МЛН
The selfish The Joker was taught a lesson by Officer Rabbit. #funny #supersiblings
00:12
Something From Nothing - a conversation w/ Richard Dawkins & Lawrence Krauss - ASU Feb 4, 2012
2:00:23
Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
An Evening with Richard Dawkins - Featuring Sam Harris - Night 1
1:39:11
Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science
Рет қаралды 566 М.
Deepak Chopra: The 5 Simple Steps That Will Make Your Mind Limitless! | E241
1:30:34
The Universe is an Activity in Consciousness
1:50:43
The Chopra Well
Рет қаралды 139 М.
Richard Dawkins Teaches Evolution to Religious Students
52:27
Gabriel Antonio
Рет қаралды 3,6 МЛН
The Poetry of Science: Richard Dawkins and Neil deGrasse Tyson
1:17:13
Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science
Рет қаралды 2,5 МЛН
Lawrence Krauss and Richard Dawkins Discuss Evolution, Religion, and More
55:53
The Poetry of Reality with Richard Dawkins
Рет қаралды 103 М.