Risk Analysis (Part 1 of 2)

How can we even begin to negotiate, mediate, or commit to arbitrate without having first analyzed our risks and exposures?
Any decision concerning the resolution of a case involves risk assessment and case valuation. Attorneys not only need to analyze the law and the facts, but they need to understand their client’s risk tolerances and make recommendations based on an objective assessment of the risks. This is complicated in any case, but particularly so in multi-party cases involving significant damages. The decisions in mediation, arbitration and litigation are all impacted by how each party has assessed its risks and exposures. This panel has vast experience in helping parties make such assessments.
Deborah Greenspan has served as a Court-Appointed Neutral in high-profile, complex, multi-party cases such as the 9/11 Victim’s Compensation Fund and the Flint Water cases. Timothy Raab is an expert in claim analysis and projections. W. Timothy McSwain has extensive experience in assessing the risks and resolving complex aviation cases and for 30 years Steve Schulwolf has litigated and mediated high-dollar, multi-party, complex cases.
#riskanalysis #negotiate #mediate #valuation #arbitration #disputeresolution #adr