If you have not seen my Tripod High Res Shot that allows the Olympus OM-D cameras to capture 80MP images, go to the video here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z2TSoHSjd9R4lZY
@michelhacquart18094 жыл бұрын
Hello from France, I do appreciate your professorial manner of explaining your themes which makes them easy to understand. This allows to follow your videos with much attention and pleasure. Thank you.
@paulustv23204 жыл бұрын
Dear Robin! Perfect tutorial! Honest, professional, competent and practically orientated! Best regards Paulus
@paulthomas89864 жыл бұрын
Wow the difference is huge. Thanks for the detailed comparison. Way to go Olympus.
@robertjackson76954 жыл бұрын
Love that smile and positive attitude!!! Exactly what the world needs now !!! Thanks for the info
@aliputera1133 жыл бұрын
This is amazing. I remember where in 2016 I used the olympus PEN F to get a high res 80 Mpx photo where I could get a RAW photo. Before taking the photo, I was able to increase the shadow by 1 stop and decrease the highlight. Incredible for this camera. Now it can be handheld. In my opinion, for technology, Olympus is one of the leading cameras.
@bakermantube4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for explaining this awesome technique of Olympus. I am a Pen-F owner and photography is my hobby. If I would have more time for my hobby, I would buy this EM1 Mark III. I fell in love with the Pen-F 2 1/2 years ago and this will be my tool for a while.
@jerryhsusc2 жыл бұрын
Robin, thank you for this video! I couldn’t figured out how to get high-res to work until a friend point me to your video which has exactly the answer I’m looking for! Thank you! Olympus’s web and video user guide should really do a better job!
@sushovanroy30314 жыл бұрын
You are a gentleman! Mean it.
@JohnInNH5354 жыл бұрын
Finally - a clear and concise overview including both the limitations and benefits of Hand Held High Res images - Thank you!!! While I'll be picking up my OM-D E-M1 Mk III today (I hope!), it certainly helps set my expectations of this outstanding feature for use in my Landscape photography. My thanks Robin for pulling this together - outstanding video....!
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words! You will love your E-M1 Mark III
@JohnInNH5354 жыл бұрын
@@robinwong - I can't wait! It replaces my well used E-M1 Mark II and will share a camera bag with my new E-M5 Mark III.... Hmmm - actually - I should stop watching your channel - you have me spending way too much money?? ;) ;) Just kidding ;) My best and my thanks Robin!
@philippedugout22784 жыл бұрын
Another great review and descpription. Many thanks. Philippe
@paulmayo89154 жыл бұрын
Thank you Robin your presentations are always a pleasure thank you so much, am waiting for delivery of the Mk3, great job........
@inspirity6684 жыл бұрын
Another great informative video Robin. Thank You! Just imagine in the future, if Olympus makes a camera fast enough that it could manage hand held hires shooting with no waiting, no limitations to moving subjects and no ISO and aperture limitations. That would be amazing!
@Mr.Camera3 жыл бұрын
I am sending this message from Hiroshima, Japan. I used to use the Olympus E-M1 Mark II, but about a month ago I changed it to a new Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The lenses are OLYMPUS M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 300mm F4.0 IS PRO and OLYMPUS M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 45mm F1.8 [Black] I have an OLYMPUS M.ZUIKO DIGITAL 17mm F1.8 [Black] and an OLYMPUS M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED 25mm F1.2 PRO. I really like this camera because it looks really cool.
@RobTrek4 жыл бұрын
Great job, Robin! This one feature is why I want the Mark III. Thanks for the great examples.
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Rob! It is indeed a very useful feature!
@IamUke4 жыл бұрын
Robin, thank you for making these excellent videos. Based largely on your content I went ahead and bought the new OM-D E-M1 iii to use as my walking around/no tripod/no filters/bad weather/landscape backup camera. (In my real landscape life I shoot a GFX 50S and X-T3, this is quite a jump for me). Thanks and keep up the good work!
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the kind words, and glad that you are getting the E-M1 Mark III, you will love it!
@manuellerida63624 жыл бұрын
Muchas gracias
@billantonacci44414 жыл бұрын
Hi Robin. Very professionally done . I look forward to trying this with my om dem 1x.
@faezsj13604 жыл бұрын
The best E-M1iii truepic 9 and the spec is better hope firmware on other can upgrade little bit in Old body like E-M1, E-M1ii
@zeroken4 жыл бұрын
I have use it for portrait on an EM1X hands- on event, it pretty amazing working well on fast shutter speed
@2UpAndOverloaded5 ай бұрын
Thank you for the informative video!
@jerryhughes47204 жыл бұрын
Al Very understandable reasons. In future videos it would be good to see more of your macro techniques. If you can especially look at the flash options you use. If Olympus would loan you a twin flash that would be really good to incorporate or even as a one-off, as far as I can see there are very few videos on this bar the first product launches. I really appreciate your enthusiasm and common sense in these videos.
@Isaac________4 жыл бұрын
Thanks. Would be nice to see a direct comparison between the handheld / tripod mode shots to see if there's a difference as Olympus claims.
@DaveHaynie Жыл бұрын
Tripod hires is totally consistent from shot to shot, and it inherently delivers better color -- four samples per pixel, RGGB, and no need for Bayer interpolation. HHHR is excellent, and it gets in more samples, but it can't do the extended color thing. I'm honestly very happy with both options.
@ggwildlife Жыл бұрын
*THUMBSUP* great stuff Robin
@mrgabrielssalvation4 жыл бұрын
Hi Robin, a few days I asked exactly for this video. Now you did it. THANKS A LOT !!!
@theosolberg4 жыл бұрын
I received my E-M1 Mark III two days ago. Yesterday I tried the hand held high res feature, shooting a few orchids on my window sill. I loved the details in the shots. I didn't know about the f8 limit, so I shot with f5.6 and the camera did not protest and according to the info in the picture this was indeed the aperture pics were shot with.
@AngelikuS_4 жыл бұрын
High-resolution shooting by hand is valid for static subjects or landscapes where almost nothing moves (with air it doesn't matter). It is the same as shooting with native iso at night, it works well for the stabilizer, but just like shooting high you cannot take fast photos with higher resolution, nor at night take fast photos with low iso because the sensor has to be more discovered time (photo of more exposure time to compensate). If you always want resolution, you should go to a system type sony a7R. greetings from Spain Robin!
@dfotos4 жыл бұрын
As every time, this video is again very informative!
@ha71794 жыл бұрын
There goes your cat in the background haha never fails. 3:47
@johnshares4 жыл бұрын
Well who’s had a close haircut ? Very smooth Robin 😁😁
@stewartlogie4 жыл бұрын
I’ve had a chance to try the feature now - quite impressive. An alternative is to upres with Topaz Gigapixel AI. I compared both methods and the high res shot does pick out the odd tiny detail that the Topaz software doesn’t. I wouldn’t hesitate to shoot standard and upres in post - Topaz Gigapixel AI is very good, though it takes a while on the computer. Next I need to try high dynamic range subjects to see any improvement there.
@DaveHaynie Жыл бұрын
Topaz is great software, but when it uprezzes, it's basically inventing detail. That's not necessarily a bad thing: we judge a photo based on what our brains see. But Olympus hires modes capture more detail. Both of them. The reason there's an f/8.0 limit is that they need the lens to resolve more detail. A very good lens might have 50 megapixels or so of resolution at f/8.0, but you lose half resolution of that to diffraction at f/11. So they cut that off.
@alessandromarzorati66684 жыл бұрын
Thank you Robin you are the best! Can you tell us in a video what is the best 1.2 lens in the trio of pro primes? Bye from Italy!
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
All the F1.2 lenses are equally amazing. They are not the same focal length so no point comparing.
@TerryD232 жыл бұрын
Hi Robin, Love love love your videos! Question. What's the advantage of shooting hi res handheld versus HDR?
@LevideoHD3 жыл бұрын
simple the best
@catherinetremerryn3 жыл бұрын
Great tutorial. Can you use any lens for the high res shot?
@JohnAudioTech4 жыл бұрын
An additional benefit of high res modes would be the reduction of "moire" that you may see in some high detail patterns such as in clothing and patterns in distant buildings.
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
That one is only true for Tripod High Res, it is not applicable for hand-held high res mode.
@praphatpong4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your tutorials robin and i have one question ,please kindly told me in handheld high-resolution can take in raw file.
@Quoutub4 жыл бұрын
Praphatpong Nonsung Yes, you can shoot in raw as far as I know
@boombalancehub6844 Жыл бұрын
which one you recommend between Sony a6600 and Em1 mark 3 when both of that use Sigma 30 f1.4❤
@Rafaga7774 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video. Although I have the OM-D 1 Mark II who hasn't this feature it was very interesting.
@vinceherried4974 жыл бұрын
I've used my mk2 on tripod for great blur of water
@manicdan4814 жыл бұрын
I think this is my favorite video of yours, the amount of info about how HHHR works is way more than I've heard by reading everything I could. I had no idea they got a cleaner image, or that it merged movement using one of the stills, this feature just blew away the competition, I'm probably trading in my EM1 mk2 really soon because the little things are starting to really add up.
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
Thanks, I do my best to share as much as I can here.
@kochlan4 жыл бұрын
Sure it's great feature for Olympus shooters who keep claiming they dont need better sensor and higher resolution :-D
@bkaustav4 жыл бұрын
Very nice 👌.. I always enjoyed your blogs... Now these videos... Does hand held give better results with sync is??
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
Thanks. The IS performance is the same, it won't make it better or worse. But it gets tricky with slower shutter speeds, as compositing time gets longer (taking 16 shots), slower shutter speeds causes higher chance of error.
@allanchin88144 жыл бұрын
Hi Robin, I'm Allan Chin from Singapore. I have been following your Streaming most of them. You are indeed A Great Tutorial on Oly OMD. Thumbs Up! Here I need your advice-I do own S Pana Leica 100-400mm Len. Do u think is worth to invest on the Oly 100-400mm Len?
@PTYC9334 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the deep explanation, I've been combing through dpreview for these high iso high res photo since the G9, but they usually stop at 3200, that 6400 photo does look a lot cleaner. There's definitely going to be limits for pixel shifting, think of it as like gigapixel AI, or deep fusion in iPhones, relatively newish tech, with further development in this field, there will be more parity to real 1 shot 50 megapixel or higher, using a faster processor, better AI to determine what to upscale instead, like gigapixel sharpen for things in motion and since the photos are going to be cleaner, take with higher iso for faster framerate. Look at google pixel HDR plus, wasn't great in the beginning, now many people prefer its stylised look.
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
The 50MP high res shot both tripod and hand-held (of course tripod is better) produces images that can even surpass actual 50MP single capture image sensor.
@PTYC9334 жыл бұрын
@@robinwong that's really interesting, guessing with the overlapping of RGB, gives it more accurate colour depth, maybe similar to the sigma foveon sensor idea, sensor stacking for a higher resolving lowish megapixel, more true to live textures as well.
@Quoutub4 жыл бұрын
Robin Wong I don't think so regarding the handheld sample images I have seen from the E-M1X. Only in not perfect light conditions (or shadow areas) it could outperform a medium format sensor with the same f number because 16 frames of a 4/3" type sensor capture more light than 1 frame of a medium format sensor.
@tappersreviews46774 жыл бұрын
Olympus has developed some wonderful technologies. It makes me sad knowing this camera, EM1 III, may represent the final evolution of the system. Smartphones are doing truly remarkable image processing that lets them punch far above their what their tiny sensors and lenses would normally allow. Had Olympus imaging division survived as normal, perhaps we would’ve seen even more amazing processing in camera. Olympus has been one of the more innovative companies in that regard. I know the new owners claim they will continue the brand, but I’m skeptical for the future.
@systemanaturae1054 жыл бұрын
Great video clip Robin. This hand held High Res Shot could be very useful to me with my wildlife/nature photos and in particular with my photos production as a video clip using the “Ken Burns” Zoom in software in my Final Cut Pro editing software. After all there is 6K HD TV and I believe an 8K has just been released. I wonder if this handheld High Res mode is to some degree dependent on the lens?? How well would this work with say a 400mm telephoto or 200mm macro lens where any hand movement is increased ??
@spanksen4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for these Informations Robin. Is the Dynamic Range in the 50 Megapixel Handheld Shot better than the normal 20 Megapixel Shot?
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
Olympus did not report any improvements in dynamic range, and I did not notice any in my tests. If there was, it was not big enough difference to be noticeable.
@macpaddy69434 жыл бұрын
Dear mr Wong, thank you for your video, I would like to know if I can use the hires resolution ( 80 Mp ) with tripod to do astrophotography combine with the starry sky af ? Thankful for your return .
@arnarn41124 жыл бұрын
I wonder if there is benefit to using the HHHR mode on a tripod? Since there is the improved noise performance to this mode, I wonder if you also get a bit more reliably sharp images with a tripod?
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
Why not use tripod high Res shot?
@DaveHaynie4 жыл бұрын
It probably won't work well at all. The technique they're using, called DRIZZLE, requires some small movement from image to image. You get this from natural microtremors in the hands when used hand-held. Google uses this for their portrait mode in the Pixel 3 and telephoto in the Pixel 4, and they actually use the image stabilizer to randomly shift the sensor just a bit shot to shot, if the phone isn't moving. I do not know if Olympus is doing this, since the tripod hires will produce a somewhat better image anyway, even with only half the samples, because of the exact per pixel sampling.
@ravimahara47414 жыл бұрын
So basically Olympus has incorporated a superfast camera and stacker in a single body. That's innovative.
@petarslo133 жыл бұрын
Hi Robin, would be good to know if "Highlights" are different when the setting is on Single shot or on Hi-Res, with same A-S-ISO. I get we have around 2 stops more.
@leonfourie57174 жыл бұрын
Very nice. And for all those critics,this is just another(also on em1 x) feature tht olympus invented. Later on there will be other brands that start there own version of this . Go olympus!!
@victorcarmelo86064 жыл бұрын
Its available on the Sony A7rIII/IV cameras. Watch Mark Galers take on this subject on YT. Ps you need software "Viewer" from Sony to Process the files, Not in camera I believe.
@DaveHaynie4 жыл бұрын
@@victorcarmelo8606 Sony's pixel shift hires is the same as what Olympus calls tripod hires -- it's sensor shift hires. They don't do hand-held hires. Pentax added hand-held hires several years ago. The A7III does a four-shot pixel shift shot... no extra resolution, but it does the same RGGB samples per pixel as Olympus does, so it's effectively about 20% sharper, with less noise and better color. The shots are separate on your memory card, you have to use Sony's Imaging Edge to knit them together into a single DNG file. The A7RIV can do a 16-shot pixel shift composite... because everyone needs a 240 megapixel image? But neither are hand-held. Panasonic has sensor shift hires, too, but not handheld. They are completely different.
@victorcarmelo86064 жыл бұрын
@@DaveHaynie Thank you, I was trying to get my hear round the differences between Oly/Sony versions after seeing Mark Geller's Sony and Robins above. Thanks again for the explanation.
@smitozza4 жыл бұрын
Hello, where you recording this vlog? It's very beautiful place.
@michaels30034 жыл бұрын
Most likely, Kuala Lumpur.
@johnny306014 жыл бұрын
I have a question. Is handheld HRS a useful option in the moutains. I shot with a Zoom at 240 mm apsc a far removed mountain. The picture was not really sharp, though focus was correct. Can handheld HRS help to improve sharpness, clarity and contrast, when there is haze, air diffraction or any bad conditions? Thanks.
@domenicocaccamo62584 жыл бұрын
Hi....I love your music selections.......maybe you can share some titles. thx. Don
@blakes8874 жыл бұрын
Hi Robin any chance you could do a tutorial on olympus workspace
@vinceherried4974 жыл бұрын
Try high Rez on fast moving water. Causes blure as if you shot at very long exposure. You don't need a neutral density filter
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
The moving water will be blurred not because of motion, but because of lower resolution in moving area. That is different from the effect from using ND filter.
@vinceherried4974 жыл бұрын
To me, looks same as if you did a long exposure. I think of it like what would happen if you took multi exposures of a moving subject. The subject would be blurred not lower resolution. drive.google.com/file/d/1FeS5VTABknuIYIlhRa0HSSwtYcnKIIeR/view?usp=sharing
@c.augustin4 жыл бұрын
Very informative, and it sounds (and looks) all very reasonable. Results may not be always perfect (I've seen some of the typical hi-res artifacts I know from my Pen F in the last image), but still nice to have. Well, one day … ;-)
@robfielding100 Жыл бұрын
Do you have to turn off IS if you're doing this on a tripod?
@kadoc19794 жыл бұрын
Hey ! I have a7iii and bunch lenses I want to switch to m1iii What do you think , your videos about to convincing me! I do mostly portraits and low light. Thanks !
@AngelikuS_4 жыл бұрын
Why do u want to change? I wouldn’t change. I have em1 mark 3 bit i'm thinking to change to sony a7RIII.
@michaelbucklow81534 жыл бұрын
Thank you Robin. Very helpful. One question please - do you still need to hold the camera steady while the camera is processing the 16 images - that is while the 'busy' message is being shown?
@stewartlogie4 жыл бұрын
Thanks very much for the explanation of the feature. In the full menu there’s a setting for delay after pressing the shutter button. Is that delay operative for handheld? If so what do you recommend to be the best setting?
@fsi22104 жыл бұрын
Very nice tutorial. Hopefully Olympus rework the scp or give us the ability to, map hi res shot and af starry to a button.
@GorCancio4 жыл бұрын
How would the IQ of this hi-res shot capability compare to the IQ a medium format digital 50mb camera? Better, worse, or it depends?
@mojbahadori96433 жыл бұрын
Hi, I am wondering if we can pixel shift while we are using focus stacking mood, means; can I get a 80 mp final stacked photo from the camera and having the both options functioning in the same time? thank you
@blie87674 жыл бұрын
Nice video. What is the merging time for the E-M1x in comparison to the 15-20 s for the E-M1.iii? (May give some indication of processing power of TruePic IX...).
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
I'd think it is about the same.
@klauslehrmann39062 жыл бұрын
Greetings. I have recently tried handheld hi-res. in a local photostore and seen if my software can read its RAWs. It can, but the res. was still 5184x3888. Does handheld hi-res. not work with RAW?
@Undel754 жыл бұрын
Hi Robin, thanks! Another great video. One question is this high res shot compable with live composite or live time?
@Quoutub4 жыл бұрын
They need to make the processing faster. And it shouldn't cause ghosting or other bad artifacts. Then it would be a fantastic multi frame noise reduction mode. It is probably already a great feature and might give you better quality than full frame. As far as I know no other large camera can combine 16 handheld raw photos. I heard that Pentax can combine 4 (?) handheld raw photos. Sony, Canon, Nikon, Panasonic, Fujifilm can't combine handheld raw photos as far as I know.
@johna56244 жыл бұрын
Hi Robin, ref the comparison images shown. Were the 20 mp images resized up to 50mp or were the 50mp images downsized to 20mp?
@remotecon19804 жыл бұрын
Sorry if this was already asked, but does it work with manual focus only lenses?
@mrgabrielssalvation4 жыл бұрын
Is it possible to customize an other button for the menu instead using the dedicated menu button? I like to switch to the menu even if I only use the EVF om my E-M5II? I think now on the E-M1III it is impossible because you need the left hand for the menu? Now I have to flip the display to go to the menu, and have to use BOTH hands, am I right?
@Quoutub4 жыл бұрын
When I watched the video, I thought that you can not use a larger aperture than f/8, it's the smallest aperture (highest f number) you can choose.
@DLD_Photography3 жыл бұрын
I have been trying to get this to work on my M1X. It is turned on but no matter what settings I use it remains greyed out. I am staying within the ISO and aperture limits. Any ideas?
@waywardriley4 жыл бұрын
Another great video Robin, your videos have helped my decision to upgrade from em5 mkii to the em1 mkiii. It will arrive in the mail today or tomorrow! Do you have any tutorials on working with ORF files and how to get the most out of them, best workflow, etc? My editing style will be similar to yours with minimal changes to achieve a natural looking photograph. With my em5 I shot jpg only for the last 4 years for ease of sharing, but I want to make sure I know how to get the absolute most out of my images when I need to. That would be amazing if you can help or point me in the right direction.
@MiaogisTeas4 жыл бұрын
Depends on what you're shooting and why. Personally, I've found Capture One to be the best overall image editor. Very fast, very stable, and no need for Photoshop or any of Adobe's rubbish. For travel and 360° image processing, Aurora HDR and Luminar are sufficient. They're much slower and less stable, but powerful enough for casual work and HDR compositing. Let us know how you get on with the new camera!
@waywardriley4 жыл бұрын
@@MiaogisTeas Great info and thank you! I will look into Capture One.
@edwintam23494 жыл бұрын
Excellent overview. I said this in another review by another Olympus visionary... I used to think it was better to consider reviews by "objective reviewers", but I find the commentary by dedicated brand photographers (Olympus visionaries, Fuji ambassadors, etc.) to be *far* more informative. Sure the reviews might be biased.... so what? Nothing is truly objective, even in engineering and science. I find the cursory 20 minute review from regular reviewers to be often too light on the actual operation and indepth usage of the camera (there are a few exceptions). The brand photographers try to exploit every conceivable function and push the cameras to their limits. Ah... now that's more far more informative! And what I see confirms what I thought of the EM1Mk2 high res shot when I first used it a while back... fantastic imagery but honestly, unless I'm pixel peeping, I found the extra high resolution to be mostly unnecessary and even unnoticeable in ordinary viewing. Sure there are exceptions when the extra high resolution is critical, but for the most part, a well shot 20 MP image is going to serve everyone very well.
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the show of support and kind words. I make a lot of videos, very few of them are reviews. This one particular video was me sharing my knowledge on certain features in the camera, and I want to be very clear in my sharing that there are limitations to this feature/technique. I always give a full picture and I never "oversell" the camera's capabilities.
@peterlemke34684 жыл бұрын
Fair comment well said. I enjoy Robin's videos so much because they are so instructive. As you say he shows what the Olympus cameras and lenses are capable of. I remember recently being truly surprised just how capable a camera the EM5 III was for video.
@MiaogisTeas4 жыл бұрын
I have to agree. What I like about Robin's videos (similar to Red43) is that he points out the benefits and flaws. As for high-res mode, it's perfect for making nearly noiseless composite HDR architecture and real estate images, or for use when capturing a 360° sphere.
@DaveHaynie4 жыл бұрын
The folks working with the camera companies are real photographers as well as brand reps, and they're there because they believe in the systems. They're also really, really well educated about these systems. You'd kind of expect that from pros, but not every one is. As an electronics engineer and a photographer, I learn this stuff pretty well, and it's pretty common to get bad or "uncooked" information from random KZbin guys... even really well known ones. But so far, not from guys like Robin! Olympus and the others really do have their pick of reps.
@jeffdrew6254 жыл бұрын
Nice video! Do you think Olympus will eventually integrate this feature for the Pen series? Would be cool for smaller travel kits & bodies...maybe? 🙂
@jeffrielley9204 жыл бұрын
How would the HHHR work on a moving subject like a waterfall?
@vinceherried4974 жыл бұрын
See my comment. It blurs like long exposure.
@robb8773 Жыл бұрын
Is the high resolution shot recorded in jeg or raw?
@williamhumber58904 жыл бұрын
Robin, would it be possible for you to measure the time it takes to process a tripod-based HR shot using the new E-M1iii and the older E-M1ii?
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
I don't have the E-M1 mark III anymore at the moment. I can try do something if I get my hands on it again.
@williamhumber58904 жыл бұрын
@@robinwong No worries, thanks for the super quick response though!
@adriangpuiu4 жыл бұрын
i wonder, what's the diffrence betwen MC-20 and tc-2
@AbrahamLatchin4 жыл бұрын
There is an additional advantage of HR shot, and that is a reduction of moire.
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
That is only true for tripod high Res shot, not for hand-held high res
@AbrahamLatchin4 жыл бұрын
@@robinwong Are you sure? Moire is caused by pattern interference, it seems sensible that patterns interference would be reduced or eliminated by an improved signal.
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
No, Moire is caused by interpolation of pixel colours. For normal RGB Bayer sensor, each pixel is filtered to record either red, green or blue colour. One pixel normally does not record more than one colour information. Moire happens in photographs when the pixels fail to resolve sufficient color information due to limitation of each pixel only recording one colour This problem was solved in tripod high Res shot because the pixels are overlapped multiple times, hence each pixel has multiple color information recorded, true red, green and blue colours. This resolves the final image with much better color information, mitigating false color patterns (Moire). Since hand held high Res shot does not overlap the pixels in fixed pattern, there is a chance the pixels never truly merge and still have missing color information.
@AbrahamLatchin4 жыл бұрын
@@robinwong I appreciate the effort in the reply. I would be curious to see how moire looks in this mode considering your comments.
@ThePNWRiderWA4 жыл бұрын
Does it have any effect on noise much like image stacking in conventional shooting ?
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
The noise benefit is only applicable for high ISO (1600 and above). Everything else stays quite similar
@AB-vb2mm4 жыл бұрын
Is there a minimum speed to use handheld highres?
@xflyingtiger2 жыл бұрын
I tried it exactly the way you described but high res mode was not an option. All the other drive modes were available but not high res hand held or tripod. Thanks anyway. Good video. Oh, my camera is em1 mark iii and lens is 40 to 150 2.8.
@MDMiller604 жыл бұрын
There is no hi res mode on the SCP drive modes. Halp. I don't have that icon. M1 MkIII
@robb8773 Жыл бұрын
I tried the high res shot handheld mode but the camera only takes a 10M Jpeg not 50M Jpeg. Am I doing something wrong??
@robb8773 Жыл бұрын
OR in RAW 16M, wtf??
@AleksanderKwiatkowski4 жыл бұрын
ISO 3200?! Should it be possible to use ISO 200 for handheld HE?
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
Pay closer attention to the shutter speed and aperture. Wait for it.
@AleksanderKwiatkowski4 жыл бұрын
@@robinwong Right. Shutter speed was about 1/250.
@gunn_maew4 жыл бұрын
Wow, at the 5:47 I can see the power of new processor, it does open the whole new possibility in the future firmware.May be just like iPhones, when you take 1 high iso shot, the camera will secretly took 5-10, do some magic trick and down sampling back to 20mp image with a very low noise
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
Dude, Olympus camera from 8 years ago already does that. Go and google hand-held starlight mode. Iphone is late to the party.
@gunn_maew4 жыл бұрын
Yes you were right, i did not really remember this feature very well, but i think it is part of picture mode? Or art style and you can not control lots of it.Anyway i think i would be more practical to be able to use this mode while being able to adjust some setting
@ericlundquist346610 ай бұрын
I imagine handheld using a manual lens would be kinda hard to pull off if the subject is fairly close.
@MartinHeine774 жыл бұрын
So this is a feature, not a gimmick?
@prudhommejc Жыл бұрын
3:47 cat cameo
@Quoutub4 жыл бұрын
I think it would be also great if they imitate Google's astrophotography mode when used with a tripod.
@stewartlogie4 жыл бұрын
After experimenting on many subjects I have to say I find the hand held high res shot mode to be of no value. Despite what Robin claims, the camera is not smart enough to detect movement and substitute the regular resolution pixels. It just gives you blurry sections. Only scenes with no movement (no clouds, no water, no leaves) is the file of any use. Scaling the regular image in Topaz Gigapixel AI gives more reliable results when you need more pixels.
@weizenobstmusli82324 жыл бұрын
I found that highres can compensate small movement, i.e. of leafes on a landscape shot. Only if it has more wind it starts giving artifacts. On days with only small wind I now use it confidently, and the result is amazing. But there certainly is a limit to the technique.
@LarsKiel4 жыл бұрын
👍
@stewartlogie4 жыл бұрын
Not much dialog here. My experience contrasts with Robin's assertion that areas of movement would be substituted with a lower resolution portion of the image. In a couple of captures that had some leaf movement those leaves were grossly blurred. The camera did not detect movement and replace that section of the image with a single capture. The image was unusable. A normal exposure that I took of the same scene was fine. My conclusion is that the feature is of no value if there is any movement in the scene.
@dannyli9424 Жыл бұрын
There is no free lunch, i found the 45 MP file from my old a7 R 3 and my really old D850 always better than those high res mode 50 MP image from my OMD E-M1x, same for the Live ND, a real ND works better than Live ND every single time, at least i don't have to stuck with that stupid 1/2 second shutter speed limit. Even when i don't have a real filter with me i still rather shoot bunch of pic and stack them in PS myself instead. I found all those Olympus " computational " feature are really just some marketing gimmicks. Nothing you can't do without it, you can only get a better result using the traditional methods instead.
@barikly882 жыл бұрын
Salam fromm indonesiap
@kristoffersolo4 жыл бұрын
Give olympus a few years and maybe one day the cameras will use high res shot on every photo and the micro four thirds system vil have the same image resolution as full frame 😊
@MiaogisTeas4 жыл бұрын
What would be the point? Most people using full-frame aren't doing anything with their images but putting them on Instagram at 1600 anyway. If you need high resolution for something like archival images or magazine prints that will be retouched to death, you use a professional medium format camera. High quality APS-C and M43 cameras are smaller, lighter, cheaper, and faster than anything in the full-frame world. Just like DSLRs, so-called "full-frame" systems are in peril.
@arisarsenis35004 жыл бұрын
@@MiaogisTeas As for magazines... 20 mp are just fine for a Berliner format magazine's double spread (that is the maximum size, i.e 45x32 cm, of the 99,5% of magazines printed globaly). And they can ...suffer a lot of post processing punishment, limited either by a purely exposed image or moderate glass. The use for FF or MF cams is only needed in very very special cases (huge cropping, luxurious items advertising et such).
@ivanguerra12604 жыл бұрын
Hey Wong, to many words to say that Olympus is trying to put interpolation in fashion, we are getting more and more far from reality, but Who cares ? Try to make this test, take a film shot maybe with Velvia 50 iso and then compare with the Olympus 50MP interpolated images and you will see lots of differences.
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
The first mistake you did - assume it is an interpolation. Interpolation means adding and filling in missing data by analyzing actual data. Hand held high Res shot did not add any missing data, it pulls real actual data from 16 real full resolution images. Your understanding on how the feature works is flawed. Who cares? Real photographers care because we want the camera to make a real difference.
@ivanguerra12604 жыл бұрын
Oh man. How fast you are, Did you make the test ? You are faster than your Olympus, How camera bodies they give you to make this UTube Olympus propaganda ? Do they included the lenses or you have to pay ?
@robinwong4 жыл бұрын
@@ivanguerra1260 oops, nothing else to say when you are proven wrong? But to attack me with baseless assumptions instead? Be a real gentlemen and admit your mistake. Else you are just another troll making useless noise in the internet.
@DaveHaynie4 жыл бұрын
Two problems here. First of all, while transparency film like Veliva 50 is not grainy, it's not terribly sharp, either. Dye clouds in typical low ISO transparency films run 5-15um, yes, it's random on the same bit of film. So it's very clear but not high resolution. Second problem: neither hires mode is classic. The tripod hires is shooting two full RGGB 20 megapixel images overlapped by 1/2 pixel. So that's a straight-up 40 megapixels of information, and without the loss of resolution due to Bayer de-matrixing, it's at least 50 megapixels worth, though to make a proper pixel matrix it's interpolated from a 40 megapixel interstitial array to an 80 megapixel proper array. The f/8.0 limit is due to diffraction. You can't get more resolution than the lens delivers. Handheld hires is snapping 16 randomly offset images and using a DRIZZLE algorithm to uprez. Again, not interpolation, but the real thing. DRIZZLE was originally invented by NASA for use in the Hubble Space Telescope. It's also used in Google's Pixel 3/4 phones for software zoom.
@pascalsherco3 жыл бұрын
j'avais olympus em1 mark iii,j'ai revendu image horrible avec le 100-400 olympus,une honte de commercialisé cette ensemble...........