Everybody gangsta until he inserts a payload inside it
@haydentravis334810 ай бұрын
Were the engines full throttle?
@josephastier74219 ай бұрын
@@haydentravis3348Those looked like demonstration engines only. You wouldn't want to try a maximum performance flight until characterization testing was completed.
@long_chin_man8 ай бұрын
it will suddenly know where it is. because ultimately, it knows where it isnt.
@viduraherath40083 ай бұрын
@@josephastier7421 With standard untouched 3d printed parts you wouldn't want to try a maximum performance flight at all lol.
@jonnscott48583 ай бұрын
I wish they made the software open source that's all.
@BPSspace2 жыл бұрын
Wildly cool, great work!!
@AKDayzplays Жыл бұрын
i remember you seeing this
@ayushcba Жыл бұрын
Big fan sir ❤
@tonysworksMGB Жыл бұрын
Your just going to let em show you up like that?
@mdhasiburrahman8806 Жыл бұрын
Can't believe BPS space is actually commenting in here
@traxonja Жыл бұрын
Roses are red, violets are blue... 😂
@mymentymen8185 Жыл бұрын
Damn did you guys really basically build a missile from scratch by yourself? That is insane. It also looks really slick the flight looked very smooth. Very impressive. Can't imagine the amount of work that went into it.
@corruptedmineral Жыл бұрын
American DIY content be like
@ghostraptor2068 Жыл бұрын
@@corruptedmineral 'murica!
@AssassinGT Жыл бұрын
@@corruptedmineral Hate to break it to you but, this takes place in china. You can see at the end of the video it even states NUAA. stands for "Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics" most of the development software was in Mandarin as well.
@daomingjin Жыл бұрын
@@AssassinGT most places in china have absolutely banned drone flights of any kind. They're afraid of "the people". Imagine if chinese have access to 3d printers and a chemistry lab? Yea, they could launch a rocket attack on pretty much any CCP asset.
@mankihonda983 Жыл бұрын
I haven't checked the legislation in 15 years but I do remember model rocketry getting a lot of scrutiny in regards to their onboard control systems. They were only allowed very rudimentary controls if you had anything like in this video the feds would have probably locked you up for domestic terrorism and manufacturing guided missiles. Be very careful when even considering making something similar, check your locals laws and such and never assume good faith from law enforcement. Those days are long gone.
@licao80552 жыл бұрын
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Undergraduate Innovation Lab. This is what the credit says at the end of the videos.
@salauddintafsir87618 ай бұрын
If you student of that university please contact with me
@alfatejpblind64987 ай бұрын
Undergrads? These dudes are hardcore
@Shaker6265 ай бұрын
That university is closely associated with multiple Chinese weapons programmes, so I'm not surprised. 😂
@dhruvasammeta693 ай бұрын
@@alfatejpblind6498 we're doing this in highschool rn, we got the tvc working
@josefonseca400718 күн бұрын
omg undergraduate??
@GuyJustCool Жыл бұрын
The idea to stabilize the descent center of lift vs center of mass by jettisoning the bottom stabilizers is amazing, love your project. Its actually first non-sounding (actively stabilized) rocket i see on YT
@macstrong1284 Жыл бұрын
Joe Bernard
@WarDucc Жыл бұрын
wait, missiles have a center of lift? i tought they worked with high twr's ? and another question, what if they don't have one? or is it even possible?
@GermanTopGameTV Жыл бұрын
@@WarDucc Anything has a center of lift. It's the point where all integral aerodynamic forces are located. You know, the wing surfaces generate lift and drag - which are nothing but two components of a force vector. These local force vectors can be integrated over the entire craft (as any surface will create some drag, therefor an aerodynamic force) and you will have a vector that has a direction and an origin, and said origin is called the center of lift. Since lift forces are usually orders of magnitude bigger than drag forces (at least for high angle of attack configurations) we call this principle "Center of lift". It plays a crucial role in vehicle stability. A stable system will always try to orient the center of lift behind the center of mass for a moving object. The feathers on an arrow demonstrate that principle very well. You put them on the end to keep the arrows flight path straight. A slight deviation from the straight orientation will increase the angle of attack on the feathers and force the arrow back into a straight flight path. This means a deviation is met with a counteracting force and self balances the object. "Straight as an arrow" comes to mind. If you put the center of mass behind the center of lift, the opposite happens: A small change in angle will, again, create a force on the guiding surfaces of the vehicle. This force, however, is now acting in such a way that itself increases the angle of attack even further. This results in a larger force, finally flipping the vehicle such that the center of lift now is behind the center of mass. The thing about aerodynamics is, that lift and drag are functions of the Reynolds number. Changing flight conditions will result in changing aerodynamic forces. You need to account for all states of flight to ensure your vehicle is stable thoughout. Especially the transsonic regime is acting up, as many properties of airfoils change dramatically in this environment. I somehow doubt that this was a consideration on this project though. To conclude: Jettisoning the lower fins simply removes their aerodynamic forces from the overall integral of all force vectors. If you remove a vector far away from the center, it will effect the resulting position of the center significantly. The rocket basically turns the direction of the arrow mid flight - from having "small feathers" up front and "big feathers" in the back to only having "small feathers" in the front, making it the new rear of the arrow as it inverted.
@davidlee1770 Жыл бұрын
@@WarDucc well, rockets have a center of lift and they are essentially oversized missiles. For missiles, center of lift isn't about generating enough lift to take flight, it's about keeping the missile stable during flight. If the center of lift is ahead of the center of mass in the direction the missile is moving, then the missile will attempt to invert itself, since the center of lift always tries to stay behind the center of mass for stability. To counteract that, missiles have fins on the rear that push the center of lift behind. However, when the missile is vertically falling and the parachute is installed on the nose, then the original design is very unideal, as the missile will now try to fall nose first to maintain stability. To counteract this, we need to push the center of lift further up the missile. The team here achieved this by jettisoning the fins, which pushes the center of lift further up so that the missile can fall thruster down.
@WarDucc Жыл бұрын
thanks!@@davidlee1770
@kekulta Жыл бұрын
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
@KabelkowyJoe Жыл бұрын
If it was that simple "algebraic sum" :) It should use some PID, because relation between how wings are adjusted and how should be set. Depends on various factors like for example speed or size of wings. Greater the speed lower the feedback should be, but not always if it would be too loow - SpaceX lost fuel, could not adjust it's position fast enough and fliped over. To not cause too much correction than necessary causing in consequence loosing it's trajectory in opposite direction - making it even worse. Simple PID should be set, to set P and I and D module properly you have to test it couple times. One to react quickly over-reacting, other integrating change add some "trim" and third simply multiply by some factor I hope you know all of this, just wrote for everyone else - it's not that simple, although more or less, way you described. Perfect algorithm would "learn" during long flight could gather information and subsequently adjust PID parameters to end up with minimal deviation. It's difficult if you deal with rocket.. to learn i hope they continue for example set goal of hiting target like baloon or something in the air :) That would be cool. First baloon with GPS attatched and both connected. Second time only visual. Private defence system :)
@Flumphinator Жыл бұрын
Beat me here.
@ДмитрийЧехов-с8е Жыл бұрын
I knew I'll see this comment
@emerychandler Жыл бұрын
You win the internet
@Ilya5522 Жыл бұрын
Classic
@qualifiednot Жыл бұрын
Ejecting the fins to change the center of pressure is so smart
@eh6971 Жыл бұрын
But why not connect them to the fuselage with a thin cable?
@qualifiednot Жыл бұрын
@@eh6971 Are you saying to raise and lower them? that would require some sort of actuator or spring based mechanism to move them, the reaction forces would probably be weird too. ejection is probably the least complex mechanism to remove the fins and make it so the rocket naturally wants to point down after it hits the highest point in its travel.
@dom_the3166 Жыл бұрын
@@qualifiednot I think he means using a thin wire to retain them as they eject
@evanweir169 Жыл бұрын
What is the purpose of ejecting the fins at the rocket's apogee? You mention changing the COP, but to what end?
@pipinggpipingg1487 Жыл бұрын
@@evanweir169 fins causes more drag at the back of the center of the mass thus would make the rocket wanna point towards the ground on the descend so they couldn't use the parachute effectively . Wires on fins could still cause the same effect as fins would float up relative to the rocket on the descend and would still be pulling the bottom of the vechile and force it to point downwards .
Incredible control nice work guys ! As someone with a control engineering background this is a very hard project to pull off. Well done
@Yuralittlebitchn1gga Жыл бұрын
ive seen more stable fireworks ]
@TrungNguyen-mj2id Жыл бұрын
With control engineering background, I don't think it looks hard. A simple pid controller should work. The hardest part comes wih trajectory control which in turn boils down to navigation part.
@mattmurphy703011 ай бұрын
@@TrungNguyen-mj2idas someone with a control engineering background, this is not an easy project to pull off.
@abdullaal-bader4610 ай бұрын
as someone with a control engineering background, this is not an easy project to pull off.
@plugg116010 ай бұрын
@@TrungNguyen-mj2id as someone with a control engineering background, this is not an easy project to pull off x3.
@kipchickensout Жыл бұрын
That looks really cool, thanks for showing the cad models and the inside as well :)
@darielrodriguez6984 Жыл бұрын
There's still hope for the generations to come. glad to see these awesome geeks kicking the coolness out of measuring levels
@ege824010 ай бұрын
obviously? new generation is always more advanced with the amount of resources and total knowledge increasing
@FireFly9699 ай бұрын
Yep you are right, there is always a percentage of people who are interested in different things, and the harder things are there will be less people interested in, or specializing in. There is nothing easy to watch TikTok all day, and the hard things, for example learning how to make missiles, drones, planes cars....@@ege8240
@haseebkhawaja1050 Жыл бұрын
As a mechanical engineer. This really is very impressive...
@Remontoire6 ай бұрын
I think what impresses me the most here is how compact/efficient the form factor is given the capability set this thing has.
@micheldriessen5081 Жыл бұрын
We used to play with rockets 35 years ago. But with what is available now, you have a world of exploration extra. Nice job ! Keep up the fun for the rest of your lifes.
@flat-earther Жыл бұрын
hi micheldriessen, have you become a flat earther yet?
@SuperGarryGamer Жыл бұрын
@@flat-earther meow
@toshibe280516 күн бұрын
@@flat-earthermeow
@mrsenator9106 Жыл бұрын
As an engineer, I salute.
@YavuzSelimKpnk Жыл бұрын
Tam beklediğim performans. Çok güzel çalışma olmuş. Zekice düşünülmüş bir sistem. Roketin kalkış esnasında yalpalanma olmaması için eksenini düzelten bir kanat sistemi (gyroskop ile ) yapılmış. Cidden çok havalı ve güzel. Tebrik ederim.
@محمدابراهيم-ط1ص3خ6 ай бұрын
انا مهتم هذا شيء ولكن لدي سؤال ما هي هذه الدائرة إلكترونية المربوطة مع بعضها البعض
@skauffman74 Жыл бұрын
Just when I thought I was an "engineer"; all those young man are TRUE engineers. Probably in a thousand years I will be able to scratch 2% of what they already know... Such a charming thought, isn't it?
@Skillot88810 ай бұрын
he really said: "i aint spending 500 thousand dollars on an AIM 9L, i guess ill have to make one" lol nice job
@archdornan438910 ай бұрын
Next step is adding this inertial nav to a model airplane. After that, TERCOM via optics
@bun726422 жыл бұрын
Your work is amazing , keep it up
@mikethezipper2 жыл бұрын
Your videos inspire me. Aboslutely amazing work. Im so happy to see you have the resources to execute such a cool project.
@AhmedAdly11 Жыл бұрын
Most importantly, it looks like China has made a mechanism that brings creativity into creation.
@evanweir169 Жыл бұрын
@@AhmedAdly11 what do you call the mechanism. the one that brings creativity into creation?
@AhmedAdly11 Жыл бұрын
@@evanweir169 one good mechanism is supporting students to carry out projects. In Egypt, such a project would be banned on the basis of national security. (it is a 7 year jail for using a drone)
@kioly_ah Жыл бұрын
@@AhmedAdly11 it's really sad that they kill the people's creativity and productivity.
@AhmedAdly11 Жыл бұрын
@@kioly_ah If you come from a free country, you could not imagine. Military dictatorship is a horrible thing. China is lucky in comparison. Also, they went from dark to light! So what we see now should be considered incredible leaps forward. Also that they will continue in that direction.
@mbunds Жыл бұрын
I have been wondering, how important is it to place an IMU at the exact center of mass? It looks like most systems keep the chips very close to this center, but a few millimeters off of the center doesn’t affect accuracy in any negative way. Beautiful work on this guidance system!
@trollmanman5576 Жыл бұрын
Theres only two thing missing in the rocket, copper and some explosives 😅
@DandSCreations Жыл бұрын
@@trollmanman5576that's on our channel lol
@MarksXmanKami Жыл бұрын
@@trollmanman5576 just one Copper rod and a cone away from being an ATGM
@dsdy12056 ай бұрын
If your IMU is mounted with separation from your COM, then it will detect spurious linear accelerations when the vehicle experiences any sort of angular rate or angular acceleration. Provided that this is characterised beforehand and filtered out of the IMU output, there should be no issues.
@stasstas887228 күн бұрын
in the center pc is for gyroscopes or needs use more than bigger mass more devices more issues Russians use hydraulic or pneumatic people already found lot of pneumatic cylinders from control systems like missile have a gas tank for 200 -300 movements electric can give big angles but is low on power and if long fly need big power supply, some of them missiles have gas collecting tubes like ak 47 power get from gas exhaust and who have seen big missiles have whole space engine in missiles with liquid fuel turbine like from the car and very poison fuel -and police don't like these toys if 6kilos toy can demolish tank -is not Soo toy to be played -russian like to show s500 but speed climb trajectory change it probably is empty same is them nukes by size and weight why make AAmisilles like nukes? carriers don't fly and size of hellfire is more than enough
@MYNautiGirl Жыл бұрын
Very impressive work guys, I'm sure you have a bright future with those kind of skills.
@atierintel Жыл бұрын
As in a nuclear bomb flash type of a bright future
@TeoMaragakis10 ай бұрын
If you were not in a list before, you are now. If I ever become half as good an engineer as you are, I’ll die a happy man.
@velocitylaunchsystems2 жыл бұрын
This is incredible! Insanely impressive work
@VisualBasic6 Жыл бұрын
After watching this video thoroughly on multiple occasions. I can confirm without any doubt that the missile knows where it is at all times. (It knows this because it knows where it isn't.)
@juestone9 ай бұрын
I dont see a place to put explosives 😂
@rohanbandaru2 жыл бұрын
My day gets better any time L Shang uploads
@AhmedAdly11 Жыл бұрын
Each time I see young people create I feel hope for the world.
@gybob100 Жыл бұрын
You better understand what you wish for in the context of geopolitical paradigm
@AhmedAdly11 Жыл бұрын
@@gybob100 it is shifting
@ZimHipHop360 Жыл бұрын
some countries cant pull this off .... but these kids did .
@angrycolonel1957 Жыл бұрын
imagine having an education system so fucking good that your under grad student are capable of manufacturing gbs guided weapons
@aminecraftnerd1920 Жыл бұрын
My man out here making a guided missile.
@rickson50 Жыл бұрын
a missile by definition is guided
@AngelBeats-KPIS12 күн бұрын
最高点分离尾翼改变压心真是太妙了。而且竟然没有爆炸螺栓,纯粹的机械加弹簧安全又可靠。牛逼!!!
@cigp Жыл бұрын
what software appears at minute 1 ? what are you testing? some sort of IMU ?
@meme1159 ай бұрын
What we need actually object detection using opensource project like OpenCV
@skyguyfpv2399 Жыл бұрын
Damn, western kids are learning how to twirk and here the Chinese are learning rocket science
@richard.fsequeira90864 ай бұрын
L Shang you have superb, knowledge and talent in all things rockets and drones. Very impressive rocket that was 3 D Printed and all the Rocket Guidance that you put together .
@92kosta Жыл бұрын
_Hamas joined the chat._
@dzgaming5785 Жыл бұрын
Nik lyhoud hhhh
@hemlatagautam3831 Жыл бұрын
Made my Day .... incredible work!
@NoahHagen2 жыл бұрын
I’ve been subbed for a while and wow I can’t believe the progress.
@wulfleyn6498 Жыл бұрын
Chinese kids having more advanced guidance tech than russian military missiles is pretty funny. Edit: called them korean when they're chinese, bit of an oops.
@lshang882 Жыл бұрын
Hey Wulfleyn, appreciate your sense of humor! Just to clarify, the kids in the video are actually from China, not Korea. While their technology might not be on par with military-grade missiles, it's still fascinating to see how far technology has come and how it's accessible to people of all ages. Cheers! 😊
@wulfleyn6498 Жыл бұрын
@@lshang882 Oh sorry, still cool though, I have problems with distinguishing languages in general so sorry for that.
@raydeemed7 ай бұрын
@@wulfleyn6498 can these kids make hypersonic ones ??? Russia has 1 u.s has 0 maybe you need to open your eyes to reality
@myeducationandresearchchan-i5w3 ай бұрын
@@raydeemedretard
@silentblackhole Жыл бұрын
Everything looks so well made! Awesome work! how long did it take from start to good launch? Did you use any open-source software? In particular for flight control or cad designs?
@nomadnoparty32437 ай бұрын
2:30 what software did u use to visualize the rocket movement ?
@ddegn2 жыл бұрын
Why do the fins "eject" at 1:16? Great video! Thanks for sharing your work with us.
@bb-bricks30402 жыл бұрын
Pretty sure so that the rocket flies straight down before recovery parachutes deploy
@ddegn2 жыл бұрын
@@bb-bricks3040 I think you are correct. I don't understand why they want the rocket traveling straight down. It sure seems like it would be hard to find those fins again. There's probably a good reason for doing it this way, I just don't understand it.
@bb-bricks30402 жыл бұрын
@@ddegn if you can see those fins on the back help control the rocket and the top (or front) part is chamfered for aerodynamics. Because of their 90 degree trapezoidal design as well as the positioning (you don't want control fins on the front of your rocket), they would negatively affect its aerodynamics.
@ddegn2 жыл бұрын
@@bb-bricks3040 I can see how ejecting the fins improve aerodynamics, I just think it's an interesting choice to discard the fins. I wonder if the fins are considered disposable. It sure seems like it would be hard to find the fins after each launch. Of course with 3D printing those fins could be replace with very little effort and very little cost. My wondering about the fins shouldn't be taken as criticism of the rocket design. I think the rocket is amazing.
@lshang8822 жыл бұрын
Because I want the Rocket to maintain the upward attitude in order to control the trajectory of the decline process, and I will try to use a reverse engine to land in the future.
@EliteIntellectual Жыл бұрын
Can I buy this project? I will use it to improve the environment, cure disease, improve society and bring democracy where it is needed.
@kioly_ah Жыл бұрын
llol
@beyondfossil Жыл бұрын
Could this be used by ground units to take out hostile quadcopter drones or other small RC?
@thefirstsin Жыл бұрын
Diy missile PagMan
@larryjsmith2767 Жыл бұрын
These Oriental boys are quite smart at making these electronic thingies. Didn't take millions to make this. I'm sure the Hamas boys will be thankful.
@jmspaceR2 жыл бұрын
Soo inspiring! Keep up the great work!
@manuel.camelo Жыл бұрын
GLORIOUS AND DIVINE 👁️👃👁️🙏 Teach us your Skills !
@Lukas-dn6wd Жыл бұрын
Engineers 1 second after they graduate (they love the military industrial complex)
@everry3357 Жыл бұрын
Tbf most cutting edge is in that sector
@blackglove9779 Жыл бұрын
What's that grid table top cover called.. I have tried searching on Google but couldn't find
@RGCbaseace2 жыл бұрын
Boss level activated well done
@Gritzian77710 ай бұрын
КРУТО!!! вы супер !!! удачи вам в дальнейшем!!! печально что у нас такие таланты не поддерживает государство...
@sajedrezaei Жыл бұрын
Great work thanks a lot for sharing
@Newtscoot860 Жыл бұрын
just casually made a SAM and prolly gonna have a visit from guys in black suits
@Kawka1122 Жыл бұрын
I like how you guys can build this stuff. In Poland they would hunt down such engineer and prosecute him until he would "shit himself". Great work with sensor fusion algorithm.
@rickson50 Жыл бұрын
pretty sure any american who watches this would be put on a special government list too so, not too far off
@Adam4A4 Жыл бұрын
AGH robi rakiety głupi mośku.
@noahw4623 Жыл бұрын
@rickson50 Basically, the rule of thumb is to keep it vertical, also no targeting systems. You break those rules, well, that's a felony
@flow5718 Жыл бұрын
Join a rocketry club or create a KZbin channel? As long as you have a valid reason the powers that be seem content to leave people alone.
@SpiraSpiraSpira Жыл бұрын
@@noahw4623t is actually perfectly legal to design and build guided rockets in America. We have the 2nd amendment, after all. If they have explosives attached, then it is a little more complicated but still possible. Testing them can become a lot more complicated as there are FAA (surprisingly not ATF) regulations that prevent guided rocket testing without special permission. Guided meaning that it lands in a specific location. It’s a lot easier to design, test and deploy autonomous loitering munitions that do not use rocket motors, like the switchblade drones and the like, these days if you are a budding Tony Stark.
@sKonkofov Жыл бұрын
very cool job. which cad was used?
@GarageSteve4202 жыл бұрын
Beautiful. I think I'm gonna go design something now
@eisnarf2 жыл бұрын
Great project and great video🙌🙌
@Jao123456100Ай бұрын
Awesome! On the position and attitude control, did you use LQR or PIDs? Did you update the feedback gains during the flight? Super interesting
@ericon.70152 жыл бұрын
Amazing quality!
@mephisto212Ай бұрын
Awesome work! Very inspiring.
@History-Remastered2 жыл бұрын
Ever considered to making this whole project open source? i would like to help with the design but also perhaps scaling it up.
@lorenzcyber Жыл бұрын
i mean id like that too but tbh i feel like such systems most likely fall under multiple countries regulations of weapon systems just like passive radar code and so son with the kraken SDR not sure if Japan has such regulations not to mention the huge amount of risk this would add for terror attacks and other things like assassinations which in japan are pretty on topic rn so i think the release of the code would be more unlikely, although this may be sweet to send the FSB a present from some activists in Russia this would be hecking sick for causing chaos inland russia
@lorenzcyber Жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/mWqXk3SCdsx4hK8 but maybe this would help ya to some extend
@danielevendrame9350 Жыл бұрын
I believe this was developed within a University institution and I don't think China has any interests in making such projects open source.
@ryanchowdhary965 Жыл бұрын
@@danielevendrame9350 Hong kong
@joshuaeah Жыл бұрын
It would get beaten the shit up by ITAR
@jeisinga Жыл бұрын
love the work you did on this rocket
@kfwj0012 жыл бұрын
下次加个遥控 再让它飞回来。省得去捡它😊😊😊
@burner81269 ай бұрын
WOW! Nice skills dude. Awesome work.
@tld81022 жыл бұрын
that’s amazing!
@mostfunnestchannel Жыл бұрын
How can you just walk around with it at the park without making rocket noises and pretending it is flying???? That was some impressive self control, I would definitely be like "FSHHHHHHHHHHHHHFSHHHHFSHHHH!!!" every time I carried it around. Amazing project I am really impressed! Also if you do ever need someone to follow the rocket around wherever it goes making rocket noises, I am your man.
@chefpatat2 жыл бұрын
Insane as per usual
@2fathomsdeeper Жыл бұрын
Did a laser guided model rocket back in the 80's with nowhere near the tech used here. Photodiodes and 741 op amps for the most part. Tube launched and two staged. Could hit within 4 feet of the aim point at 500 yards.
@area-xw9yb Жыл бұрын
yes
@zesetai2110 ай бұрын
I'd love to hear more about this one...
@Andrecio64 Жыл бұрын
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't, by subtracting where it is, from where it isn't, or where it isn't, from where it is, whichever is greater, it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance sub-system uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is, to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position where it was, is now the position that it isn't. In the event of the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has required a variation. The variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too, may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was. The missile guidance computance scenario works as follows: Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is, however it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subracts where it should be, from where it wasn't, or vice versa. By differentiating this from the algebraic sum og where it shouldn't be, and where it was. It is able to obtain a deviation, and a variation, which is called "air"
Hello. What books you recommend to read about it? List of software design and simulation did you use? I want to know.
@EucaBear Жыл бұрын
Chinese students: "We developed a missile flight trajectory control system while still at university." U.S. students: "There are 47 genders."
@NextFuckingLevel Жыл бұрын
You kidding?? Those 47 genders could be weaponized as "freedom" bullet
@OutonfromalldirectionsАй бұрын
Lahoull astaghfaar tabarah Lakum dee nouukum walee yaddeen illainshaallah amin ya allah.
@TheBeardedEngineer2 жыл бұрын
Just keeps getting better and better!
@TheEngineer4077 Жыл бұрын
The missile that knows where it is by knowing where it isn't. Brilliant!
@mattmurphy703011 ай бұрын
Unbelievable work, great job!!
@MikusVilsons5 ай бұрын
Could you be so kind and provide us with more detailed specifics = Bill of Materials (BOM), 3D model designs etc? Thank you!
@EliteWorm Жыл бұрын
This is INSANE. Congratulations, guys! Truly impressed.
@flat-earther Жыл бұрын
hi eliteworm, have you become a flat earther yet?
@septicoof7291 Жыл бұрын
This is the first time i see the "remove before flight" properly used
@2006-honda-civic610 ай бұрын
russians: our civilians can own guns up to assault rifles americans: we can do that and a rocket propelled grenade some random chinese dudes:
@averagewarcrimeenjoyer1210 ай бұрын
As a russian we cant own anything, just some stupid semi auto shotgun
@2006-honda-civic610 ай бұрын
@@averagewarcrimeenjoyer12 oh thx
@العقيدمعمرالقذافي-ح4ف10 ай бұрын
@@averagewarcrimeenjoyer12i saw chechen with ak-47 ?
@averagewarcrimeenjoyer1210 ай бұрын
@@العقيدمعمرالقذافي-ح4ف on the frontline, not civilian territory
@markoni2536 Жыл бұрын
Where can i download 3d model of the rocket?
@LEON-zo7ce Жыл бұрын
Very very, very impressive ....imagine the hard work and determination needed to create such a project ....
@Hydro2Mech10 ай бұрын
That was awesome. Gread job. That was very satisfying to watch :)
@beanieteamie7435 Жыл бұрын
Wow! Absolutely incredible work.
@走出帝制走向共和 Жыл бұрын
B站上早就关注了,这里也来支持一把!
@kermitinmountain63718 ай бұрын
What kind of booster did you use for takeoff from launching pad? You should encourage many American Students to do the same as you guys did with your projects! Thank you.
@KYPSTRYOG11 ай бұрын
bro built a missile at home and thought no one would notice
@skaterfabi11 Жыл бұрын
great project, what kind of sensor fusion algorithms did you use for the IMU?
@aaronmarkstaller Жыл бұрын
Nice. What program for telemetry and data do you use?
@TiLaDn6 ай бұрын
Is it better for the fins on the top to be aligned with the ones on the bottom or would it be better offset
@HồngPhongNgô-e4l6 ай бұрын
I don't know if there is any balancing mechanism to help you? it works really smoothly.
@ivanenko8762 Жыл бұрын
good job!!Du you have a 3D model your rocket?
@giank_dev9 ай бұрын
What applications are they using or have they created it themselves, with what? 🎃
@StalkerFromSouth Жыл бұрын
Вот это грандиозная работа, молодцы, лайк
@CarrotMan-kw5zz11 ай бұрын
What simulator dod you use for the Aerodynamics? it looks really cool.
@shashwat_dubey_8 ай бұрын
were you able to find out?
@CarrotMan-kw5zz8 ай бұрын
I didn't find the exact one but I found SimScale to be nice.@@shashwat_dubey_