Roger Penrose and the Quantum Soul: The Theory That Suggests Consciousness Never Dies

[@ashoksinha4711]

न जायते म्रियते वा कदाचि, नायं भूत्वा भविता वा न भूयः, अजो नित्यः शाश्वतोऽयं पुराणो, न हन्यते हन्यमाने शरीरे. He is never born nor dies, nor has he been nor will he ever be again, he is unborn, eternal, everlasting, ancient, and is not killed in the body that is being killed. ( Gita 2:20)

[@TheUnknown79]

Long live prof Penrose long live

[@danibrrrrrr]

One of the greatest minds indeed. Roger Penrose is a genius. Thank you for making this video I love this type of content.

[@briansmith2836]

Except Penrose doesn't believe consciousness survives death so this video includes some BS

[@Naidu-k8m]

A brain is simply a receiver of all information that is always all around us. So, a death does not end anything except that life. Our belief about consciousness is just our mind bending over it like it was a very special thing. Hence the ideas behind divinity and special powers of the mind are fictional

[@Spiritual-Quest]

That's an intriguing take! If the brain is merely a receiver, could it be that what we perceive as divinity or special powers is just our limited way of interpreting a much larger, universal signal?

[@aletheia161]

​@@Spiritual-QuestA larger scoped materialism without the religion.

[@used369]

The Electro-Magnetic Wave, embodies Spirit and Soul. Spirit is Electric, and Soul is Magnetic.

[@galaxymetta5974]

Modern research on Near Death Experience by Raymond moody, reincarnation memories by Ian Stevenson/Jim trucker and past lives regression by Brian Weiss all independently but coincidentally show that our consciousness survive death, we live many lives and our thoughts and actions matter in the hereafter. So be kind and helpful to others, be virtuous, meditate and cultivate ourselves to higher spiritual levels. Cheers.

[@tomdunnnz460]

Consciousness is universal. It does not mean that your individual expression of that consciousness survives beyond death. Rejoice in this magical moment that is YOU. For tomorrow we die. But life continues.

[@Spiritual-Quest]

Beautifully said. If consciousness is universal, could our individual expressions be like waves on an ocean... unique for a moment but always part of something infinite?

[@ZeeshanAkram1976]

Consciousness is outside from physical realm..itsnot from brain

[@Spiritual-Quest]

If consciousness exists beyond the physical realm, how do you think it interacts with the brain to create our experience of reality?

[@ZeeshanAkram1976]

@Spiritual-Quest This is the mind body problem unsolved for centuries

[@ZeeshanAkram1976]

@@Spiritual-Quest There are three things merged in humans 1-Material body 2-Awareness of his Being 3-Soul/spirit

[@johndewet7494]

How come you haven’t won the Nobel prize?

[@jperez7893]

i'm not sure about consciousness but information cannot be erased permanently. therefore it is theoretically possible to reconstruct a simulation of that consciousness

[@Spiritual-Quest]

If information is eternal, could a reconstructed simulation of consciousness ever capture the essence of awareness, or would it just be a shadow of the original?

[@jperez7893]

@ thats an open question

[@mickeygets6686]

My theory is we actually are just video games characters and don’t know it. I coined my theory “ simulation theory”. I will post further work of mine in my next book. “The theory of everything”.

[@rongarza9488]

Oh don't bother.

[@zeroonetime]

The Soul I.S. spirited 010. From 0 we come to 0 we go.

[@DinamoDeet101]

Not matter to us at all..good life on the Earth and peace matrer only..do not care about AFTER.

[@Spiritual-Quest]

If the soul originates from 0 and returns to 0, could the journey in between be about realizing the infinite within the finite?

[@MarkHWiebe]

My theory is that space is consciousness.

[@Spiritual-Quest]

If space is consciousness, do you see it as a passive backdrop or an active participant in shaping reality?

[@metodalif4770]

Is it bigotry, stupidity, cultivated ignorance... that the researchers do not consider the data from near death experiences?

[@Spiritual-Quest]

Could it be that researchers hesitate due to the subjective nature of near-death experiences, or do you think it's a deeper bias against exploring phenomena that challenge materialistic paradigms?

[@metodalif4770]

@@Spiritual-Quest My opinion: Research data could/would make one's ethical stance uncomfortable. Subjectivity is an issue that NDE researches pay a lot of attention.

[@TheUnknown79]

Okay AAA yako

[@zeroonetime]

God forms 01 in-formation. Souls squeezed between 010. Yesh meAiin. X Nihilo

[@davidrandell2224]

If you don’t know what gravity is don’t call yourself a physicist, astronomer or cosmologist or indeed even a well informed human. Gravity is simple Galilean relative motion. The earth is approaching- expanding at 16 feet per second per second constant acceleration- the released object (apple). Physics- pukka- started in 2002. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well.... everything. Penrose and ALL the others are mere mathematical philosophers.

[@Spiritual-Quest]

Penrose is much more than a mathematical philosopher; he’s a renowned physicist whose work has deeply influenced the field. His contributions to general relativity, such as the Penrose singularity theorem, revolutionized our understanding of black holes and the nature of space-time. Additionally, his ideas about quantum mechanics, particularly in his theories on consciousness and quantum gravity, push the boundaries of what we know and stimulate dialogue between physics and philosophy. His interdisciplinary approach has opened new pathways for exploring the fundamental nature of reality, making him a pivotal figure in modern science

[@davidrandell2224]

@ What is Penrose’s CAUSE of gravity? He - and ALL the rest- have none. QM classicalized in 2010. Forgotten Physics website uncovers the hidden variables and constants and the bad math of Wien, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Einstein, Debroglie,Planck, Bohr and Penrose. So,no. Any Final Theory MUST account for gravity. “The Road to Reality “, Penrose is right up there with the greatest science fiction novel- “The Abstract Guesses of Man- made Hopes”, AKA “ Principia” by Newton. Read first then comment. SR wrong due to reference frame mixing and bad math.

[@MontyVideo969]

Misleading title. This is an idea or at best a hypothesis. Nowhere should the video imply it is a theory.

[@Spiritual-Quest]

Fair point! Scientific terms like 'theory' do carry weight. When it comes to the concept lf consciousness, pretty much everything is a hypothesis. Would you agree that framing it as a hypothesis invites curiosity while maintaining accuracy?

[@MontyVideo969]

@@Spiritual-Quest No. It is too contraversial.

[@stationary.universe.initiative]

Gravitational singularities are utter nonsense

[@davidrandell2224]

SR wrong due to reference frame mixing and bad math. GR follows as incorrect. So,no.

[@beammeupscotty3074]

he constantly denies religion

[@maxruedy951]

Until someone can prove Penrose wrong his theory is as good as any other.Within reason of course.The universe itself looks like a giant brain full of neurons firing off all over the place when looked at in the macro scale.

[@briansmith2836]

Wrong he doesn't believe consciousness survives death

[@Spiritual-Quest]

But.... what exactly is death? Consciousness is bigger than death

[@zeroonetime]

Or = light (H), Everything I.S. Information Systems, packets of Light and DArk. 010

[@Spiritual-Quest]

If everything is an interplay of light and dark, or information systems, do you think consciousness acts as the decoder, or perhaps even the creator of these packets?

[@zeroonetime]

@@Spiritual-Quest Time creates ~ Timing destroys = 010 Akin 01 Matter-Antimatter.

[@Salmonellatyphi]

Hindu scriptures me hazaro saal se likha hua hai, we don't even need penrose

[@Spiritual-Quest]

ancient Hindu scriptures delve deeply into consciousness and existence. But modern thinkers like Penrose provide a bridge, making these ideas accessible to a wider, more scientifically-inclined audience