Roy Spencer - Global Warming: One Scientist's View of the Science and Policy.

IHMC Florida Institute for Human Machine Cognition 2005 Evening Lecture Series

[@tobysmith3459]

Roy Spencer is a very good speaker. He knows climate science and is, probably the leading pioneer in the science behind global temperature metrology, . The best scientists for providing the public with accurate information on climate change.

[@xenonvelasco6007]

Thank you Roy Spencer for excellent lecture and fighting the global warming zealots.

[@Proemed44G]

9 yrs later boy U were sure wrong on that

[@bewarethegwen]

​@@Proemed44Gwhy? What's happened?

[@Proemed44G]

@@bewarethegwen Maybe you live underground... Meanwhile the surface of planet earth is getting hotter and hotter faster and faster just like the laws of physics predicted... What happened you asked.... The answer is its still HAPPENING and it will soon be unstoppable unless we act... Those are FACTS...

[@Winston-lf7sb]

@@bewarethegwenrecord breaking heatwaves every month, every year and a climate that is destabilizing faster than nitroglycerin on a roller coaster. potholer54 is an actual presenter of FACTS and only FACTS. not opinion. Not even his own

[@bewarethegwen]

@@Winston-lf7sb what can you do about the sun?

[@fayfairley6339]

Do not comply with Net Zero they are so wrong! Thank You for The Excellent Presentation ❤️

[@dks13827]

Roy please make more great videos. Thank you.

[@Robertperezshow]

So basically. The whole point is there is still a lot we don't about earth's atmosphere.

[@Johnny-dp5mu]

Any one that has used a y complex modeling knows that you can generate any result you WANT; how? By manipulation of the properties of the variables; and the variables are extremely limited; complex systems cannot be limited to study one variable...

[@clivehorridge]

By today’s reckoning 11 years after this presentation, this video effectively ended at 17:00, because the big deal the climate alarmists rely on with their predictions of fire and brimstone, is shown to be between 0.7 and 2.9 degrees F by the doubling of CO2. Not 3, 4 or 5 degrees C. Job done. Please, let’s have an update presentation in 2020👍🏻🇷🇴🇬🇧

[@Proemed44G]

Here is your update he has been PROVEN WRONG !

[@olivertatlow8537]

He said at the beginning he'd be "giving more opinions than facts" Opinions are not science.

[@shirlp6046]

The truth is that the science is nowhere near "settled" regarding the climate. Computer models cannot replicate the past therefore they cannot predict the future with any accuracy.

[@SteffiReitsch]

@@shirlp6046 It's settled, pops. The only uncertainty now is how long have we got under different emission scenarios.

[@andrewstout5400]

Aged a h*ll of a lot better than algore and Hansen predictions

[@dks13827]

Al ger Gore ?

[@swisscottagecleanairaction]

Fighting over this makes no sense. "Experts" should declare who pays the salary for the time they spend arguing for one side or the other.

[@groblerful]

Thank you for a most balanced lecture.

[@Proemed44G]

Why ? Is there a different argument on a different channel ?

[@chrisruss9861]

The model of heat and cold movement around the earth from satellite data was impressive to watch.

[@32125096]

Pl read Robert Ion Holmes: Molar Mass Version of the Ideal Gas Law Points to a Very Low Climate Sensitivity.

[@markcampbell7577]

We understand the basics of climate and climate damage done by halogenated vinyl halogenated carbon and nuclear technology.

[@phillipking792]

why no comments recently most of us could benefit by watching

[@Proemed44G]

Because its 7 yrs later and obviously Roy Roy was WRONG!

[@markcampbell7577]

Electric power without fuel wind or water has been possible since the 1920s. We are grossly misinformed about power generation after Niagra falls. Personal Edison generators with inverters can replace woodcutting everywhere.

[@johnholmes912]

did not lorentz point out the problem of chaotic dynamical systems back in the 1960s ?

[@markcampbell7577]

Temperatures and humidity are not related to precipitation. Really.

[@kimlibera663]

Roy is one of the better scientists out there & balanced.

[@Proemed44G]

how the F would U know ?

[@johnkoenig346]

Bravo. It just makes sense.

[@Proemed44G]

What makes sense ? His biased OPINION paid for by the Heartland Institute ?

[@markcampbell7577]

The Glacier Bay Alaska century of decline is worth mentioning.

[@franklinmartin8103]

Well, refreshing, apparently some one attended the same series of university classes, whether they were offered as Environmental Chemistry (400 series senior year) or Atmospheric Chemistry (340 or 430 series). He got the same facts and information and understanding that I did.

[@Proemed44G]

Did U then work for the Heartland Institute too ?

[@franklinmartin8103]

@@Proemed44G golly jee looky here someone is jealous and now corked off.

[@Proemed44G]

@@franklinmartin8103 Looks like someone has similar political values... Do you want kids to be taught Creation science in public schools just like your hero Roy Spencer too ?

[@franklinmartin8103]

@@Proemed44G Who is Roy Spencer? It would appear that YOU know this person where as I have never heard of him and probably don't want too.

[@neuoylann1909]

Excellent video. However I do not agree to consider that the amount of CO2 increase is the result of recent human activity. The fact that the CO2 content is increasing does not prove that there is a relation with CO2 generated by industries. Indeed, generally the temperature increases first and then, after a long time, corresponding to the limitation of heat transfer as well as the recycle time for the CO2 to get degassed, stripped by rain and returned to oceans. This period of time is in the order of one thousand years therefore the today CO2 rise is the result of the temperature which occurred one thousand years ago. Furthermore the CO2 provided by the industry represents less than 1% of the total amount in the atmosphere which is negligible for global up-warming.

[@markcampbell7577]

We have Edison generator and dynamos power plants and vehicles to easily replace fossil fuels and nuclear power plants and vehicles. We don't have an energy crises. We are grossly misinformed about power generation and power use. We can change to using fossil fuels to support the atmosphere and fertility against pollution .

[@nelsonvienneau7348]

where can i find Roy Spender’s website?

[@2rcalkins]

The best point here is that there is always a risk in living and the costs to live entirely safe may be too high to be worthwhile including the costs to freedom, and I agree on all points. Ultimately this is God's planet and plan and we are obviously a considerable part of that plan.

[@Proemed44G]

Its that kind of low IQ thinking of yours that got us into this mess !

[@EasyEs]

@DSD1v57BG32 In the context of the argument he puts together here why does that matter? Darwin had very unscientific views on black people, are you going to throw out evolution?

[@markcampbell7577]

Why are we obsessed with carbon dioxide and greenhouse gases but not Edison generators and dynamos power plants and vehicles to replace nuclear power plants and fossil fuels power plants and vehicles?? Tesla's cars should be using a battery powered dynamo to power the electric motor so that we have unlimited range electric power vehicles without fuel or charging stations. We could more cheaply build trucks cars and airplanes to fly or drive with unlimited range. We have been grossly misinformed about power generation and power use.

[@Proemed44G]

Ok I'll bite... I cant tell if your talking real or not... I gave U a thumbs up for realizing that heat and humidity are not independent things when it comes to animals being able to stay alive so your not a nutjob... But what exactly R U talking about, and dont say dynamos and Edison generators...

[@markcampbell7577]

Share

[@Johnny-dp5mu]

What is the Earth's angle with the sun; season of year? Nice global view if temperature along but tens days tells nothing about long-term trends... It's 1,000,000+ times too short to have statistical significance. It just gives you information about movement for those particular ten days... Thanks for showing. Hopefully the zipped work is truthful.

[@markcampbell7577]

Cloud cover condemns us to heat.

[@markcampbell7577]

Edison generators use the field magnets to move the armature magnets and coils of copper wire. Tesla bound Edison's generator with magnets all around the armature and used water to move the armature magnets and coils of copper wire. We have not recovered from this deciet and propaganda.

[@Proemed44G]

Dude thats how a simple generator TRANSFORMS DC TO AC... It is not a source of power

[@vmgqie]

I have the answer, LFTR

[@johnclayton5691]

This video is not giving findings.

[@CG-zm9oj]

That was brilliant :)

[@Proemed44G]

For a Simple propagandist yes...

[@CG-zm9oj]

When it makes sense it becomes much simpler to understand. Unlike the current net zero, or even absolute zero, which makes no sense at all.

[@Proemed44G]

@@CG-zm9oj Its not about what answer you like... Its about what is true... So I promise you, this guy is lying and telling you 1/2 truths and sometimes just making things up because of his political affiliation.... The atmosphere warming is and will accelerate happening even if you dont believe in it...

[@CG-zm9oj]

@@Proemed44G he's not the only person who says it and it's all based on agreed science so no the warning is not going to suddenly accelerate Ice cores tell the truth

[@Proemed44G]

@@CG-zm9oj BS !!! Its called POSITIVE FEEDBACK of climate... Now if you can show me how to increase emissivity without increasing warming I'd like to see you do that

[@EasyEs]

@DSD1v57BG32 Oh I am well aware of his personaly feelings, also there were people in Europe in the science community who didn't think there was any basis for viewing blacks as less intelligent etc, who stated cultural differences for their lack of civilization. I am not ragging on Darwin who I respect. Also I don't know where Spencer claims to be a creationist.. From what I can tell, and NASA he is a competent scientist, and you provide nothing to back up your claim of otherwise

[@dks13827]

Cultural differences is why they invented NOTHING EXCEPT FOR SPEARS ?? Yeah right. How about their IQ's of 70?

[@Proemed44G]

Read the wikipedia page on your Roy Spencer... He is on record as claiming Creationism is more scientific than Evolution and that Creationism should be taught in public schools...

[@markcampbell7577]

You might ask this scientist to explain global warming global infertility and greenhouse effect in a similar fashion.

[@brucehutch5419]

He says nothing about sequesting carbon dioxide by plants growing. that's how carbon dioxide is sequestered in nature. CO2 carbon dioxide is food for plants.

[@Proemed44G]

CO2 is NOT plant food ! That is a Heartland Institute MYTH ! CO2 is CELLULAR RESPIRATION in plants.. Glucose is plant food NOT CO2

[@brucehutch5419]

@@Proemed44G . Your sorely ill informed. Carbon Fixation Cycle. Is a critical Factor is why plants are green. What group worked out the Carbon Fixation Cycle. Which one of them was awarded the Nobel Prize for that. Back in the day I could write out all the steps of it for you. With some review I can do it again. Have a nice delusional day.🍃

[@Proemed44G]

@@brucehutch5419 Plants are green because of chlorophyll... You should try googling that

[@brucehutch5419]

@@Proemed44G I forgot more about plants and other biology by the halfway through my freshman year in college than you can try to fake by stumbling through Google. Yes that's what I was saying without using 'C'. What's in the center of the chlorophyll molecule.

[@Proemed44G]

@@brucehutch5419 OMG U must be a Freshman.... U said " plants were green because of the Carbon ring " WRONG its not my fault U dont know what chlorophyll is Dont bother to try and impress me with your poor biology skills I have an MD junior I'll wipe the floor with U easily.... My undergrad was Engineering and U R no match... Anyone who thinks CO2 is food is incompetent as to how plants produce/use ENERGY...

[@gpettipas]

The Truth About Climate Change - Dr. Patrick Moore - Greenpeace Co-Founder

[@Proemed44G]

LOL Moore is NOT a scientist he was a college Forestry major