Royal Marine Reacts To Finally !!!! Russia shows off its 6th generation stealth fighter | Mig 41

Original Video (Finally !!!! Russia shows off its 6th generation stealth fighter | Mig 41)
• Finally !!!! Russia sh...
MY EQUIPMENT:
Camera: amzn.to/3W9dL37
Lights: amzn.to/3JtLflf
Key Board: amzn.to/3JpPWwx
Headphones: amzn.to/3JrF15x
Mouse: amzn.to/49P81ij
Monitors: amzn.to/4aLd1FP
Mic: amzn.to/3U7XWXY
Audio mixer: amzn.to/4b2FJSr
StreamDeck: amzn.to/4b4lHH1
Favorite Books:
Norse Mythology: Neil Gaiman: amzn.to/4b24Ftc
The Way of Kings: Brandon Sanderson: amzn.to/3JyHIlu
Breath: James Nestor: amzn.to/3Jur9Y7
We Are Nature: Ray Mears: amzn.to/3JurhXB
The Last Kingdom: Bernard Cornwell: amzn.to/3w4JjN0
BECOME A MEMBER
/ @originalhuman
SOCIALS
►Instagram / originalhuman_
►Twitter: / originalhuman_
►Discord: / discord
►Facebook: / originalhuman.videos
►Business inquires: [e-mail]
DREADNOUGHT MEADERY!
KZbin: / @dreadnoughtmeadery
Instagram: / dreadnoughtmeadery
OTHER CHANNELS
►The Sword And Scabbard: / @theswordandscabbard7909
►OriginalAdventures: / @originaladventures2728
►OriginalHuman Geek: / @originalhumangeek

[@kimchi2780]

FYI that photo with Putin is an F35. You can tell because there is a Dodge Ram next go it. The second photo with Putin is an F22. Also all of the quotes from Ilya Tarasenko about the Mig41 are from 2018.

[@user-lm1ms1kq7x]

ну он жэ уникум который картинки смотрит и верит ППц гениий

[@lianobarbosa8438]

NATO don’t believe nothing Russia said but they afraid of it 😂 interesting

[@devinjenkins4752]

6:40 that is correct, that is why stealth bombers are flat as all hell. Flat means no bumps means less reflective bounce back being picked up by radar.

[@berlinkozyreva]

Actually not flat but curved. To reflect radar in all directions except back to receiver.

[@bradleydanek3958]

the covered aircraft isn't even a MiG. its a sukhoi 75 checkmate

[@Lontracanadensis]

Yes the one at 4 minutes, that's definitely a Checkmate.

[@kimchi2780]

It's not even a plane it's a mockup.

[@Egonowhere]

Russia did this with the Foxbat… Say it can do impossible things and then the US makes the F-15.

[@kimchi2780]

And got a Foxbat and found out it was heavy and over hyped.

[@vinteb7987]

The US should believe Russia's lies over this "6th gen aircraft" so they can create another banger of an aircraft like the F-15

[@MrScottyFoy]

You can see in the picture with Puten that the picture was of a us make. They’re fallowing the jet with a RAM pickup in the background. The other pictures look like the Russian Checkmate

[@AlexisLopez-pb8ms]

Russia can’t even make a fleet of 5th generation fighters so the said “screw it let’s just skip to 6th generation “ really?

[@sumailagodswill1426]

Bro you are lost, you watch cnn and bbc too much, Russia is building the su 57 just that they shifted focus mostly to the already existing fighters like the su 35 and su 30

[@wenomechainsama6780]

​@@sumailagodswill1426su57 is like 4++ generation 🤔

[@sumailagodswill1426]

@@wenomechainsama6780 then what’s the su 35s 4+ if that’s your analysis then the f22 and f35 are 4th gen because we only know what we are told not to mention the recent update we got from congress that only 25 percent of the total f35 are combat ready lol what’s a joke, the s400 will just eat those 25 percent up the moment they surface on radar

[@KhanKeal]

@@sumailagodswill1426 ok, vatnik... Keep telling yourself ruZZia is a great power, and the west will tremble before these (imaginary) fleets of su-57 and t-14s...

[@nithinvenu4707]

Isn't europe doing the same? They skipped 5th gen and is developing 6th gen

[@michaelcloss565]

I mean the idea that Russia could build a pretty incredible fighter isn't unheard of. They have been near the top and rivaling the US for many decades now. I see 2 major issues though which make this kind of a "who cares". First off, they often overstate their capabilities. It doesn't mean they are super incapable but if we look at examples like the MiG 25 it was super fast but not nearly as fast as they claimed. I wouldn't be surprised if they produced a great fighter, but the idea it's going to go mach 4+ seems like a very VERY long shot. The other thing is lets say they do build this aircraft AND it's capable of everything they claim it is, will it even matter? Will they be able to produce enough of them in a relevant time period or is this going to be like the SU-57 where many years later they still have just a handful. It doesn't matter how great your aircraft is if its outnumbered 47 to 1.

[@AlbertoMartinez765]

Its all about Money they Just Don't Have it if they had an nearly unlimited Budget like the US has then sure but they are squeaking by and the sanctions on them hasn't helped. I have more faith in China doing this. Look how Big the cockpit is on that plane its probably closer to 5th gen then 6th.

[@breckohlson7410]

lol, the hanger they show some pics from has "No Smoking" in English...spent all their time photoshopping the jet and messed something like that up. Believe it when I see it.

[@TheCashman007]

You do know there is a think called "stock photos" right? and those videos are AI generated for clickbait !

[@motusprimus8785]

I wouldn't bet on there being footage of a 6th gen flying in testing. The US took flight with testing in 2019 and they manage to keep it under wraps so far. Just a comment they had been flying "for a year" meaning it took flight in 2018, maybe. From what we know, It seems contracts have already been signed. The US tend to play a game of notifying of production 2 to 3 years after productions begins. If we look at the F-22 and F-35, They were already in service when the US announced production, 5 year and 2 years later, respectively. Like with the SR-72, the US has gone back dark of their projects again. So, we have no idea what they really have. Russia may have something but it likely won't meet all the benchmarks of what is considered a 6th gen fighter. They haven't really achieved a 5th gen fighter yet.

[@eyeseverywhere1599]

That picture has an American RAM truck in the background

[@foulplaymead]

Russia hasn’t even perfected their 5th gen

[@user-po3ev7is5w]

LOL! Russia never got it's alleged 5th Gen fighters activated.

[@AlexisLopez-pb8ms]

C’mon Russia. When you do your propaganda at least make it kinda believable. Really? A Mach 3 cruising speed. It’s 2024 not 2054.

[@alexkor380]

Where the MIG31 flies (at maximum altitude) its maximum speed is Mach 2.8. So if you create a good engine (and Russia knows how to do this), work on the fuselage (Russia can do this too) - you will get an airplane that flies in the stratosphere at a speed of Mach 4. Watch the video of the highest flights of the MIG31 - the curvature of the Earth is visible from the cockpit.

[@troopdog23]

The year has nothing to do with it. The US and Russia had Mach 3 fighters in the 50s and 60s. Speed is worthless in today’s fighter jet world. Worthless.

[@ultimatezenku]

@@troopdog23Not necessarily Worthless as no one has successfully create a Hypersonic Aircraft at Mach5 Yet so Speed can definitely still be Improved upon but yea not as prevalent as it was in the 50’s and 60’s

[@AlbertoMartinez765]

hahahah Mach 3 for 2 sec maybe! Hahahaha

[@Carnage388z]

Typical American spotted.... If US would have done the same,it would have been absolutely fine but if someone else does,"it's a myth"... like seriously?

[@markhennessy7598]

They still don't even have the technology to produce a single piece canopy. 6th gen? Yea right 😂

[@BravoCheesecake]

I love how Russia and China are getting outpaced so quickly in the air that they need to start skipping generations to keep up. Like the SU-57 isn't even considered to be 5th gen.

[@thesarcasticliberal]

It's not unheard of. The most extreme example of this being the IDF Lavi, which was a "1st generation" jet with the capabilities of a 4th generation jet. Of course, China did CCP things and took the design, cheaped out on the engine quality, and had to dramatically increase the weight with extra supports. That's how the J-10 was born and it's still their primary 4th gen jet to this day. That said, as you point out, Russia hasn't even developed a true 5th generation jet--their Su-57 is an improved 4th generation jet (4.5) and there is precisely zero chance that they will develop a 6th gen in the near future. China might, but only a couple years after we do it, and they have a chance to "borrow" some of the plans.

[@hooywamd00pe95]

Skipping generation numbers, not actual generations lol

[@steeljawX]

@@hooywamd00pe95 I'd argue it's generations. Like if the UK were to jump into the fray right now they'd have a noticeable gap from super sonic 4th gen fighters to unmanned, stealth, hyper-sonic, info relaying 6th generation. Gen 5 was mainly about stealth in air superiority and multi role. Having that absence is a bit of a literal generation skip.

[@user-kh6yg1wu9w]

Ты глуп, спроси почему ваши " хвалёные" F-35 отстали от "" Доисторических" Ту-160 как можно быть такими тупыми!!! 😂😂😂

[@Mgidynasty]

They don’t even have a squadron of 5th gen lmao they’re not even truly stealth

[@Blackard84]

How many different concept art/ai image/actual airplanes are they going to show in that video?

[@everypitchcounts4875]

US working on 6th gen fighters after actually building every previous generation so far and the only one to be working on a 3rd gen stealth bomber. F-117, B-2 & B-21.

[@shaggyrogers4898]

Ive gone down your rabbit hole, i love your videos man! Love hearing your dual perspective of royal marine/u.s citizen. Great work keep it up! Got a new sub from me :)

[@eskopikataival430]

A Finnish intellectual (writer, actor. director, philosopher, politician) once stated: "Everything in Russia is shit, except piss". I don't think that things have changed.

[@steeljawX]

I mean, their "government" convenes in soft-serve buildings as if that's the best place they got.

[@fortanell1]

Let’s see… at what time of the combat in Kiev will Rambo and the top guns are going to appear…so far…43 nations including USA cannot defeat the bad Russians .. the miraculous armament, wellllll…let’s say is not working at all…i just wonder…

[@timbo8870]

For not knowing much, they have some pretty detailed "information" The pictures in these videos are for visual entertainment. Most of what you see isnt what they're talking about

[@Soliye.]

They’ve literally reiterated what they said themselves like 6 times and those were all speculations with absolutely nothing to back that up. Basically, we don’t know nothing about the gen 6 and it’s likely gonna be arse.

[@raptor221]

4:07 that's su 75

[@colbunkmust]

Russia: We made the first 6th gen fighter! Also Russia: Can't establish air superiority over Ukraine despite competing against legacy Su-24s, MiG-29s, and Su-27s made in the 1980s... DARPA and Skunkworks: 🤣 Also the photo with the blurry Putin in the foreground, in the back you can see one of the trucks is a RAM pickup which means it was almost certainly a photo-shopped pic from the US. Looks too much like the fuselage of the F-22 too. Edit: F-22, not F-35

[@nemanjaljubicic5282]

Literally Russia have air supperiority since begining of special millitary operation

[@colbunkmust]

@@nemanjaljubicic5282 The fact that Russian aircraft are using standoff weapons to conduct strikes to avoid engaging into Ukrainian controlled airspace, have lost numerous airframes since the conflict started, and the Ukrainians continue to use their own air-launched weapons to make strikes on key Russian targets clearly means we have different definitions of "air superiority". Then again, based on your spelling you may have been talking about a pilot's dinner.

[@DerDrecksack87]

​@@colbunkmust whats ur point? Ukraine has probably the highest amount of AA, from MANPADs & to long range AA from any other european country, or atleast had in the first year. Why risk more aircraft than needed? They changed their tactics and took out most of the more capable AA over time with drones & ballistic missiles, in the last 5 months they had more and more uncontested airspace, atleast regarding dropping ordnance, close air support still is and probably will be an issue until the end due to the huge amount and variety of MANPADs in circulation.

[@colbunkmust]

@@DerDrecksack87 The US didn't seem to have this issue in Iraq in 1991 despite the fact that Saddam Hussein had the third largest air defense park in the world and after the US and Russia. That conflict lasted what? Four months? If Russia can't even manage to effectively suppress Ukrainian air power and AA in a massive airpower mismatch, then they don't have air superiority. If they had air superiority they wouldn't be suffering the casualties or equipment losses they have been taking. That's why it matters. Lobbing ballistic and cruise missiles into city apartments and power stations isn't an effective strategic use of resources. Side note: Ukraine doesn't have "long range AA". Patriot is medium range.

[@DerDrecksack87]

@@colbunkmust the US hit power stations & command centers as priority targets in Iraq i have seen it live on television back then, how are power stations not a strategic target if the military is using it too? The US set the precedence back then and argued the legality against all opposition🤣 Iraq was a lightning in a bottle, they had a lot on paper but it was in an abysmal state, their tanks still had factory setting on the T-72As when captured because they didnt knew how to use it, they had no night capability and after a few days they had no commander, HQs or radar coverage anymore, at that point even if they wanted to, they could not have put up an effective fight without knowing what aircraft to target and WW2 era tricks like parking tanks half burried as pillboxes in the open wasnt really up to date either. Nevermind that the coalition went in with almost 600k soldiers from the start, the russians only now in the last few months have started reaching that amount, the first year and a half they barely had 120k against almost 800k ukrainians armed & trained on modern equipment, not kitbashed or locally produced T72s like Iraq... By ur logic the US should have never lost a plane in Vietnam, wich it did plenty. Dunno if the Patriot is long or medium range AA, but together with the S300 ukraine still has has a pretty adequate mix of systems against almost anything the russians would use for CAS or air superiority, its not like they would not slap an A10 the same way out of the sky as they would an SU-25, or that the Patriot could not engage an F-35 the same way even with its stealth tec, so why would the russians risk it if they have drones & missiles? Worked pretty well against the Iris-T and Patriot batteries. PS: bringing up the Iraq war as an example for "winning" aint that good when it is one of the biggest war crimes in recent history, starting a war with false evidence was questionable even back then and the coalition still proceeded without a UN mandate(funny enough thus violateing the sovereignity of that country, you know the same thing they point the finger at russia now...), wich ended in the direct & indirect death of almost a million iraqis and destabilized the region, clearing the road for ISIS & co. to emerge...

[@KevinSmith-rs3wm]

This is history repeating itself. Anyone remember the Mig-25 and what American produced to combat it, the F 15

[@patrickjames8050]

As I recall in a show. "Ain't going to happen."

[@GamBreezy]

I guess we know where that missing F-35 went

[@jwfromsg9100]

Meanwhile in the USAF Command: Sir we are running out of development funds! Admiral: Naaah, make a video with pics of all russian fighters and claim the 6th Gen fighter will be presented soon. That`ll fix it!

[@stevenwinklepleck8395]

Also, the USAF is supposed to award the contract for the NGAD (6th gen fighter and air dominance platform) any day now. Lockheed's entry, the favorite to win the contract, has already flown multiple successful test flights and the systems intended for it are being implemented into the F-35 for real-world testing and debugging

[@Tbone1492]

We don't even know if they have a 5th generation. Unless they make a magical breakthrough!

[@jamesmcclain5005]

Since the thrust is the same as the SU-57 at 37500 that means that the 19% improvement comes by way of weight reduction. Thrust to weight ratio for the SU-57 is 37500/40790= .9193. Improving this ratio by 19% is .9193 x .19 = 1.094. Since the thrust is the same the improvements must come in weight reduction, so 37500/1.094 = 34277. The change in weight is 40700 - 34277 = 6423. That is a lot of weight reduction! Aerodynamics says that this 19% "improvement" has to be proportional to the change in speed. Mach 2 x .19 = 2. 38, this is far from mach 4!

[@user-lm1ms1kq7x]

продолжай не дооценивать Россию 👍 молодец так держать Омереканец

[@victorgurule3711]

I honestly doubt Russia will build this plane to much functionality as explained in this video. They claimed the Foxbat was this overly advanced plane that really didn’t do much. 🤔

[@sumailagodswill1426]

What about when the west hyped the stupid patriots missile system and it end up shutting down more us fighter jet than the Iraqi scud ballistic missile it was supposed to shoot, guys all am trying to say is that this things happen

[@kriswilson7245]

I don't believe shit Russia says but in all fairness I THINK their current attempt add a 5th generation fighter has been legitimately clocked at Mach 3.5 so going up to Mach 4 isn't impossible. Especially with new engines.

[@svealusmagi4165]

America makes products that last in warm climate. Russia needs to make products that can be used in very cold climates. That is a very big difference.

[@Anthony26x]

USA 6th gen fighter should be a win soon because Lockheed Martin has already started teasing with pictures on Instagram about the next gen fighter and the six GEN should be using laser technology so if you really think about it, Russia is still behind in technology so as China and every time the US announce a new plane or new technology, Russia in China is trying to announce the same thing it gets annoying

[@MichaelScheele]

More recent American stealth aircraft designs eliminate the vertical stabilizers to further reduce the radar cross section. Look at the B-2, B-21, and the concept art for the NGAD (6th gen) fighter. To reach greater speeds than Mach 4, they need two key breakthroughs: improved combined cycle engines and an airframe capable of managing the high heat of > Mach 3 flight. The US has been working on these to develop successors to the SR-71. If the US has not publicly shown such an aircraft, how likely is it that the Russians have caught up with and surpassed American designers? The Russians have to contend with the same physics that the Americans have to and they have to do so with less sophisticated materials and manufacturing technology at their disposal.

[@wuotaniruoperath8410]

What's with the fake news? The one in the video is the Su 75 and NOT the Mig 41. The Mig 41 will not make its first flights until 2026 while the Su 75 will go into series production this year. The Su 75 is still the first 6th generation fighter. Production will only cost $30 million and the Su 75 can be converted into a drone within 30 minutes.

[@marcmichaud1643]

Mach 3? Itll fall apart after it reaches mach 2, just like the MiG25 and MiG31. The US built the F15 because it made them nervous, only to find out that these MiGs had "some assembly still required" painted on it after they analyzed it. And then the US found out that the F15 was superior in every aspect. And its still only second to another US design.

[@marcusallen35]

They should Photoshop Putin walking upside down or walking up a building 😂

[@jacoblongbrake8230]

Russians supposed to be working on 6 Gen. Its called Checkmate lol true story You'll see one every twelve years at a museum

[@jwhittinghamphotography]

Considering their "5th gen" aircraft was more of a 4.5 gen. I don't have high hopes for this, especially with the state of Russian military strength and success in Ukraine.

[@Recceman901]

I'm with you and highly doubt their claims, as the Ukraine War has proven that all Russian Tech is way over blown. I would suspect that the US and/or Japan is the first nation to be successful at cracking the 6th Gen nut. I say Japan, because they admitted they stopped trying for their own 5th, bought the F-35 and take it's lessons and are applying it to building their 6th Gen fighter...which was 6 to 8 years ago, with today's computing ability that has allowed for much quicker design proofing and suspect someone is very close to this goal. I love Military Tech until it's used for it's intended purpose.

[@charlesmaurer6214]

that hump looks like the canopy is open and it opens forward.

[@jeffreystanley7884]

Russia cracks me up. This is a repeat of the Mig-25 which Russia crowed was this all world best Jet with all these great capabilities which led to our building the F-15 and then it turned out the Mig-25 was a piece of crap compared to the F-15.

[@jamesmcclain5005]

It's funny that they show an AI generated aircraft, but then covers the jet in public. I suggest it is just a model.

[@BionicBurke]

Russia calling anything a 6th generation when they've not even got a true 5th generation fighter is kinda laughable.

[@stevenwinklepleck8395]

The covered up single engine plane is probably a Su-75 Checkmate prototype. Russia has been known to build fast planes, but the MiG-25 Foxbat and MiG-31 Foxhound (just a modified/modernized MiG-25) have very little in the way of capabilities other than just high altitude, high top speed. Military Technology is not a channel known for posting videos with any strong basis in fact. Russia probably has claimed they intend to fly a 6th gen fighter by 2025, but that doesn't mean they will. They MIGHT develop an engine than can push an airframe to Mach 4, some sort of turbo-jet ram-jet hybrid. But fast is not that important in terms of 6th generation fighter capabilities. 6th generation will be defined more by a higher degree of stealth on par with a B2 or B21, better power production from the engines to power more complex computing systems, more powerful radar and infrared tracking systems, more powerful decoy and jamming/hacking systems, possibly some sort of directed energy weapon system, and overall more powerful data-linking and communication systems enabling the use of AI enabled drones for weapons deployment. But, more importantly than just a more stealthy fighter is the system as a whole. The fighter, the drones, new weapons/missiles, and modular systems that can be updated/upgraded easily. Not to mention the presence of the NGAD fighter/system in a battle space will, in theory, increase the capabilities of older fighters just by being present. For example, you have F-15s on station and they get flanked... Imagine that eventhough the F-15 pilot can't get a lock on the target because, perhaps, the target is behind it, the integration of the NGAD system will allow that F-15 to fire a missile that will loop back and hit the flanker using the radar or infrared tracking of another friendly asset in the area

[@kennethhicks2113]

Stealth is tricky, but if shape topography is the only consideration, consider a sphere and a cube, the cube will have a consistent radar return, the cube will not and will be much more stealthy with radar returns from CERTAIN angles (size and radar freq huge factors btw). Reiterative, many aspects of stealth and other means are used to compensate for deficiencies in shape topology, of course with certain compromises. 1, 50 or a millions words can't scratch the surface and this is meant as only a basic visualization regarding aircraft shape and stealth.

[@jacobtiger964]

Russia doesn't even have a 5th gen aircraft the disaster that is the sukoi 57 felon is technically a low visibility 4th generation

[@alexr1482]

Dude, you've been had! All fake info. About the only "real" line here is the Sukhoi Checkmate, which they've shown a model/static display at an airshow.

[@lobokurg2786]

The only way that thing is hitting Mach 4 is if its falling from the sky.

[@AustinBunyard]

They don't even have a real fifth gen jet

[@Nimbus1701]

This looks like concept for the Checkmate. It is likely Russia won't even be able to field an operational 5th gen fleet. Maybe 7 or 8 true 5th gen Felons, with the rest being hangar queens or used just for parts. They'll (along with China) will likely skip 5th gen and focus on 6th gen, with actual operational fleet aircraft being somewhere between a 5.25 to 5.50 gen aircraft with enough "operational" aircraft to field a fleet. The smartest thing Russia (and China) have done is partnering together to exchange ideas and combine their technology advancements, and they will still be behind the US in advancement.

[@pugsbella]

russia math doesn't add up, they fudge the numbers

[@alwinciocortez8649]

In reality there 6th gen is not even close to par with the f22 raptor

[@akshaynyaharkar]

There are no details shared or discussed by Russia about 6th gen program Mig -41 is a Replacement for Mig31 incorporating 5th gen characteristics some of these KZbin channels make over hyped videos stating Half baked information please avoid videos from such channels. Mig41 is under development and no official no’s for max speed or cruise speed are shared Russia is planning it as a Reconnaissance and interceptor Aircraft

[@jesselenz5452]

I suppose theoretically the technology is possible but I don't see Russia coming up with it. After all, they still haven't come up with anything like the SR-71 and that plane is over 50 years old. The SR-72 is said to have a maximum speed of Mach 6 so maybe they can come up with something that's Mach 4 but I think that's more propaganda than it is real life. We'll see what happens over the next couple of years but don't hold your breath. Imagine the SR-72 engine on a 6th generation aircraft with AI technology and thrust vectoring. That's the type of stuff I see the US coming up with.

[@SeanGelarden]

Can't keep their airlines operating, won't be able to build because they don't have the parts

[@Gbear6108]

At around 13:30 when u were talking about aircraft upgrades, the f15 and f16 are the most used aircraft for something like upgrades, such as the f15EX

[@zulkifzach2496]

If American underestimated Russian jets.....it's better stayed there.

[@steeljawX]

I mean I'll give Russia credit where credit is due. They can do missiles, submarines (kind of), and tanks in mass. They've never had a strong air or sea game. I'm pulling from history here on that. The fact that they had a bumbling fleet get wiped out after doing just about everything wrong (the Baltic Fleet of 1912,) have yet to actually complete a full functioning Aircraft Carrier (which they really don't have any use for other than to be part of the Carrier Club,) they really didn't have any amount of air superiority during WWII (that was being done by the UK and US,) and so far the proxy wars have not seen Soviet/Russian made fighters/interceptors really have much of a superior advantage over any other machine out there. They just happen to be the cheap one other nations can afford. On the other hand, I keep feeling the meme coming on. Kid: "Can we get F-35?" Mom: "We have F-35 at home!" F-35 at home: Also Russian media or at least their military press doesn't seem to be connected with reality. Traveling at mach 4 means you're creating a sonic boom, meaning everyone can pick you up on some form or another. Traveling at mach 4 also does a number on the outside of the aircraft as little bits of debris basically sand it off at that speed. Lastly, no one is trying to go above mach 1-1.5 because you're never actually fighting at that speed. Yeah, you can intercept really fast at mach 4, but how effective is it when you've got to slow down and take 8 miles to turn around? I'm just saying that their boasting of speed isn't impressive because they're trying to brag about their pissing prowess at the start of a 100m dash. No one's impressed by it and are wondering what that has to do with the price of fish. Last thing is I really REALLY doubt they have something capable of Mach 4 that's also effective because Russia isn't exactly famous for the operational distance of their aircraft. They also haven't expressed much of a desire to go beyond the old Soviet borders, meaning they're building insanely fast "rockets" instead of long flying "fighters".

[@steeljawX]

Also this sounds like a very VERY high tech machine that would need a lot of stuff currently on sanctions to Russia. So how they're saying all this stuff is beyond me. Unless they're manufacturing microchips and semi conductors now, I feel like this is something requiring something Russia is currently poor in. I'll also comment that I'm sure it'll only be after Russia and the US come out with Gen 6 fighters that China will suddenly have a 6th gen fighter that coincidentally looks a lot like the stolen information they took from US and Russian projects but apparently are "completely original." Same looks, about 1/5th the performance and 30x's the boasting about capabilities not there. If they didn't keep doing it, I wouldn't be saying this, but China and Russia keep trying to brag about something that hasn't actually happened (our missiles can sink a US Carrier! A single one of our 5 gen fighters can take out every F-22 and F-35 out there!!) and it's gone from slightly shocking to boring to annoying to something I will mock every time it's done again. Stop trying to s*it fire and piss mercury and we'll stop having this interaction of me making fun of your alleged technology.

[@MarkLandrebe-ef5yd]

Look what happened to Su-57 & Russia's new tank !! NOTHING !

[@johnzubil2875]

From what we've seen of the Russian military, does anyone still believe that their a threat. lmao.

[@veritasliberabitvos454]

Mach 4 is not out of the question. The new engines being produced and the not round , vectored shapes will have better air flow and reduced air temperature differentials. You need to got higher when you go faster. The faster you go the more air resistance and friction heating - go higher the air is thinner and colder. The catch is most engines flame out at high altitudes - they are just not designed for this. The other thing is, the faster you go different radars can now pick up up based on Doppler on shock wave created by the air craft flying. Basically weather radar / wind shear alone with picking up the condensation on the shock wave. What is not talked about are the issues the west has with F22 and F35 aircraft. These planes are a logistical and financial nightmare. 1 hour air time is 8 hours maintenance and 10K per hour. Then their whole stealth thing has been shown to be rubbish - sensor fusion techniques of using many different sensor systems with integrated signal processing means a radar system (single) that can sense stealth is in the region but not good enough to get lock for missiles, when you have 3 or more of the same radar and some signal processing you now have the resolution for radar lock - (same technique radio astronomy uses with multiple dishes). That is why the Russian air defense systems are getting better all the time. Throw in the longer range they have with their missiles and that the missiles can be guided from multiple sources. Attackers have real issues getting dominance or into an effective range. And then there are the optical radar systems Russia is working on and will be part of their air craft systems.

[@valilucifer2379]

actually douglas mcgregor, scott ritter and otheres said it Russian teck its over 10 years more advanced than NATO or U.S a good example russian kinzhal reach mach 10

[@VNOltec]

The big bulge over the canopy was likely because it was open.

[@troopdog23]

Russians just skipping 5th gen for 6th gen Mach 4 aircraft? Does Russia realize speed is absolutely useless in today’s fighter jet world? We had Mach 3 fighters in the 50s and 60s yet the f35 is a Mach 1.5-6 aircraft? Russians gonna Russian.

[@aeramas]

my brief research looks like that Saturn AL - 51 engine puts that aircraft in the speed class of a F-15 Eagle

[@aeramas]

look up the Thrust on F22 or F35

[@audiovideotech9777]

Did you notice the workers with Saab tshirts? No way Saab would be part of the Russian jet.

[@thesarcasticliberal]

Let's fast forward this--Russia will declare that they have the best jet in the world and only 6th gen, the US military will freak out and develop something that beats what the Russian claim their jet can do on paper, and then it will come out that the Russian system didn't actually exist and they have fallen even farther behind than before their brag. The MiG-31 was a somewhat okay plane for when it was developed, but it's hopelessly outmatched by pretty much everything the US runs. It's very fast, but western air-air missiles are faster and can be fired from NLOS to kill the MiG before it even knows that it's under attack (their radar is trash). Ironically, the best Russian jets are likely Indian variants of the Su-30, as India saw the lack of quality and so they got France to fix the optics and radar, and the Israelis to fix the electronics and targeting systems, as well as install EW systems. They basically patched up the main issues with the base Su-30, making it a very solid plane.

[@morganpittkin6867]

I think Putin got into AI-generated content

[@aviator2252]

Well the US I going to "believe" the Russians and build an atmo/space fighter

[@Anthony26x]

Then North group Grumman is working on a new fighter jet as well for the US Navy and then Boeing is in the race with Lucky Martin

[@saureco]

9:57 that can't be the jet in question because the one in the image is a single engine. The proposed fighter is supposedly a dual engine.

[@CADEkilometro14voaQuevedo]

Why does it look similar to the Chinese plastic version of the f22

[@walterbryan2637]

The SR-71 did 3.8 Mach so the speed is never been a problem for Russia I might believe that I just don't believe you can keep a pilot alive while it goes that fast and you'll probably never get the plane back

[@johnmiller6688]

The ability of Russian planes to go fast is ok, but to hit mach 4 they would need to go from a turbofan to a ramjet, turbofans cannot operate above mach 3.5. BUT they would have had to develop an entirely new stealth coating, because current RAM (radar absorbent materials) cannot be maintained at at those speeds--it cooks off. Which is why the B2, B-21 Raider, and the F 35 are all subsonic, the F 35 can only fly supersonic for around 50 seconds or it will damage its RAM. The US 6th gen aircraft are using a completely different stealth coating consisting of ceramics and cameras to project the surroundings onto the planes. So the idea that Russia has managed to solve these impossible engineering challenges is highly unlikely. And the US is reportedly paying over 350 million on each 6 gen airframe. And the computers onboard would be impossible for Russia or China to create because of Biden's Chips Act restricting high end computer chips needed for such the computers and radars

[@chrislopez8382]

isn't the SU75 the wood prop model? 41 sounds like a drug fueled dream

[@nathanmintz8185]

It will be more like a gen 4.75 lol

[@theunknown5962]

Classifying generation by yourself

[@nathanmintz8185]

​@@theunknown5962It's called sarcasm. Because it won't ever actually meet the criteria for 6th gen probably won't even meet 5th but will possibly be more advanced than older 4th gen.

[@theunknown5962]

@@nathanmintz8185 how can you be so sure

[@nathanmintz8185]

@@theunknown5962 evidence of past Russia over hyped garbage

[@MrJesiah3]

5:03 I saw this actual video days ago and thought this was the actual aircraft, but as you yourself noticed Putin is AI superimposed. And now looking at that same picture, that is a F-22, not a Russian airplane. Take a look at the white truck on the far left side, that's a Ram truck (U.S.). That tug is American and that guy in the back dragging the chocks (yellow blocks) looks U.S. Air Force. Edit: 10:23 That aircraft has been mentioned by Russia in the past couple of years or so and it's a single engine version of the F-35 and it actually would look something like 9:30.

[@mike28003]

They don't even have a 5th gen

[@AustinBunyard]

The ngad has already flown and will be in mass production in 2030

[@Leonarco333]

6th gen? So they skipped 4th and 5th and went all the way to 6? Without employing any of that tech in any other sectors than an air frame? If they had that tech available their tanks wouldn’t be getting clapped by farmers.

[@1bc003]

Why is there a machine gun on a 6th gen if it needs a gun it's not a true 6th gen in my opinion.

[@Wildturkey10121]

Looks like a russian jet nose, they have those drooped noses.

[@zayhansdah]

i don't think Russian aircrafts are overhyped lol, unless someone is really feeding off of their propaganda, but other than that most of their aircrafts are just that..... also the pictures in the video of the aircraft being pulled, doesn't seem Russian lol and looks more like an F22 Raptor and the F35, there's a RAM in the background, pretty sure they dont sell RAMs in Russia

[@moneypromusic4419]

It's really hard to accept the truth ain't it.

[@SledgeHammer43]

The F 35 lightning has a Pratt n Whittney F135-100 engine that produces 43'000 lbs of thrust. So in comparison it would be under powrered.

[@berlinkozyreva]

True f 135 is most powerful engine in the world but f 35 only has one engine but the mig 41 will have two al 51 saturn engines at 37000 lbs each so 74000 lbs of thrust . I am not worried though even if made at best 20 copies will be made

[@shootscoot883]

Single engine Mach 4 😂😂😂😂😂 i guess they have it completely stripped down!!!

[@buckeye987]

They don’t have a 5th gen. Ridiculous

[@jamesgeorge2852]

I'm doubting those specs lol the Sukhoi flanker line of aircraft are still Russias best fighter in my opinion they'd be better off upgrading that platform for now may be 4th Gen but still potent

[@oklahomaallen5477]

I think maybe 2034 they might be able to field a low end sixth generation fighter as of today do United States has already flown two of their sixth generation fighter and already have a competition one more that’s already in trials. And I’ve already started on the seventh generation fighter designs.

[@geektechpow4537]

Well they barely build a 5th generation, but for what? it has nmever really given an advantage in any war US has engaged. so even if Russia do not build a 5th gen, they could skip directly to 6th Gen, especially now that they have lot of feedback on actual war operated with drone and cyber warfare. US has always been about highest tech.. but so expensive to build, to maintain, to operate... Russia has always be more pragmatic and making sure that it is easily maintenanable, easy to build and as cheap as possible. The difference is that few years back, Russia did not have a lot of budget for their military. Since the war in Ukraine and the sanction, Russia has now put more money in their military... so this aircraft could happen sooner that we though. Now ill it be good? I'm sure they will think of 6th gen with the use of drone and AI...

[@danjames-ud7nr]

When do they show this jet? I saw a bunch of AI mockups.

[@JustinStLouis-xz7ut]

Saving this video to come back and laugh at! 😂

[@beesnestna9544]

Yeah, you're right. Don't expect much at all from the notoriously sensational claims by the Russian military. First of all, it's not a Fighter, it's an Interceptor. Secondly, Russia can't even keep up with the demands for their MIG-35 program (a relatively easy plane to build compared to the proposed MiG-41). They've built hardly more than a dozen (non-stealth) SU-57s.🙄 To sum things up, I'll quote from an article about this jet from NationalInterest's website: "It is a starfighter; a work of fiction that would perform well on the silver screen. Although, getting this bird into the unfriendly skies in any meaningful way by the close of this decade is, well, fantastical. Still, it makes for some great propaganda-and likely some really cool concept art. Keep dreaming big, Moscow. Eventually, you’ll go far."😆 BTW, that nose-down (draped in black plastic) jet that's portrayed as the MIG-41 in the video looks eerily similar to the F-35B that crashed in Fort Worth Texas (Dec. 15, 2022) and was subsequently covered (on the airstrip) in red plastic wrap. Looks like they doctored the photo and changed the plastic-wrap color to black. There's a video of it here on KZbin. Look it up and tell me I'm wrong.😉

[@apro_zbruh]

It’s the su75 checkmate

[@joetorres7966]

They keep saying it’s gonna be this or that… hell the SU-57 is a 4.5 4th gen. Not a 5th gen. It’s all BS.

[@theunknown5962]

It is a 5th gen fighter

[@sumailagodswill1426]

You don’t know what’s you are saying

[@lonerangerak5232]

You can tell when a russian is lying because their lips are moving . The SU57 is barely gen 4.5 . Did russia design a new stealth wood screw for putting it together . Slava Ukraine !!