Making a mountain over an anthill. This goes on all the time , all over the oceans all around the world
@Julietkilo19923 күн бұрын
Same as Russian Bombers in our airspace routinely "escorted" away by the RAF
@peterpheasey73526 күн бұрын
can't stop rubber dinghies crossing the channel, does not say much for their due diligence ,and ability to stop foreign invasion
@gregnorth641313 сағат бұрын
Thats down to liticians and tge EU, UN and WEF. Not the military.
@redplemons80848 күн бұрын
England can not secure any water anywhere anymore
@raymondwong37396 күн бұрын
Britiannia no longer rules the waves for sure!
@ANGLO-SAXON87PATRIOT17 сағат бұрын
Who says it does these videos are just bogus
@rossco8811 күн бұрын
More bothered about the dingys
@AndrewAustinFrustrated9 күн бұрын
This is a regular occurrence for the royal navy and it isn't something the UK gets bent out of shape about and given these ships were shadowed as they passed through the channel on route to St Petersburg it's another instance of a KZbin channel making a mountain out of a molehill.
@Black_Sun_Dark_Star9 күн бұрын
So... what's all the European ships sailing in the Taiwan Straits? If the Europeans can do it, why can't the Chinese?
@johnoliver78507 күн бұрын
Taiwan straits are controlled by Taiwan and China not just China
@Black_Sun_Dark_Star7 күн бұрын
@@johnoliver7850 So is Taiwan a sovereign country?
@kierano83906 күн бұрын
@@Black_Sun_Dark_Star yes
@Black_Sun_Dark_Star6 күн бұрын
@@kierano8390 At this point, not even the USA admit that Taiwan is an independent sovereign state, must less a great majority of the world. So believe in that delusion all you want, but until there is an international political acknowledgement, it will not be.
@kierano83906 күн бұрын
@@Black_Sun_Dark_Star there is international political acknolegment from many un countries. tiwan even used to be a perminant member on the un security council. keep coping chigger bot
@n4lra111 күн бұрын
The stock footage used, should be more carefully screened. One of the ships, appearing to be a destroyer, was flying a Japanese flag.
@nicholasforman11958 күн бұрын
This is complete nonsense…No way would China send such small ships that distance and least of all behave so stupidly.. The Chinese are way above that..
@raymondwong37396 күн бұрын
They used the South China Sea footage to further slander China! Good job for spotting it!
@cutezachie6 күн бұрын
@@nicholasforman1195 are they, though?
@tiffanybeauregard867511 күн бұрын
Traveling waters peacefully and surrounding other countries ships are very different things.....
@danielch666210 күн бұрын
Thumbnail is insane. British destroyers aren't that big. And Chinese ones aren't that small. Are those toys?
@amandarhodes40729 күн бұрын
Those Chinese warships circling the royal navy FRIGATE is like the flies circling a sleeping dog. Pay them no attention they can't and won't do anything to... bug you...
@gregnorth641313 сағат бұрын
Correct, there is a strict military protocol on this. Nimrods made three passes, on the third the Russians often locked their radar on to signify the aircraft as a target. Then both waved good bye.
@viorelpiscanu942511 күн бұрын
Same question about presence of Royal Navy in international waters far from Uk...
@Hottiger18188 күн бұрын
But this is EXACTLY what UK and USA ships do in international waters near china...every day !!!
@davidwolf22612 күн бұрын
The only reason the Chinese navy was present in the channel was to give a new slant to the geopolitical environment.
@chrismair816111 күн бұрын
Excuse me? It is called the English Channel for a very good reason.
@LEON4PRES11 күн бұрын
LOL! Good one.i don't think that guy /\ got it.
@francescxavierbulto984810 күн бұрын
😂
@miked40278 күн бұрын
And the only reason the Royal Navy was there was to give anybody who needed a lift to the UK coastline!
@chrismair816111 күн бұрын
At Least the Kriegsmarine played the DARTH VADER theme up the Tames River. The First German Warship up that far ever!
@amandarhodes40729 күн бұрын
Yes the German ship on it's journey back down the Themes back out to sea sailing past HMS Belfast next to tower bridge who rotates her ww2 6 inch guns and be like... " do that again, I dare you. Jutland all over again"
@peterlloyd58077 күн бұрын
It couldn't have been a royal navy ship ! "Not flying a union flag" 😂
@robertwren88783 күн бұрын
Cos we're not at war YET
@stephenfleming3125Күн бұрын
The Union Jack is only flown on a Royal Navy ship at sea whilst at anchor between the hours of sunrise and sunset
@peterforden591710 күн бұрын
It's not the technology that makes the R.N. great it's the crew's manning the ships and using the technology, and their training !
@peterhawran1463 күн бұрын
Because British warships help patrol in or near the South China Sea & possibly the Boxer rebellions. etc.
@Cathayius-z6y2 күн бұрын
China insists on FONOPs. Just as the UK and other Western navies criss-crossing Taiwan Straits & South China Sea as they like. No need to make a hullabaloo on this transit!!
@nklow8811 күн бұрын
You mean freedom of navigation is only available for West in SCS. PLA is sending a message it can do exactly the same thing in Europe.
@newton1831111 күн бұрын
Yes but The UK abides by International right of way Laws, Unlike china who thinks it owns all the seas.
@MarvinChenFantasy9 күн бұрын
PLA is good student of west navy, you should not send a single warship near China if you don't want to see a Chinese fleet in English Channel.
@jrmotorsports553210 күн бұрын
Thanks
@Hottiger18187 күн бұрын
The Chinese ships are so very considerate, they realise how poorly made the 2 aircraft carriers are, spending so much time in dry dock,..so they visited the channel so saving RN such long arduous journey to china sea.😊
@raymondwong37396 күн бұрын
The 2 Chinese carriers 16 and 17 are the first for China's fleet and they are more advanced than any Navy's first couple of carriers for sure! Don't you think so? And those carriers are to protect China's water and unlike USA, to harass other countries; so what is the point of sailing all the way to Europe?
@patrickyoon91916 күн бұрын
Wonder why it is called South China Sea for century. While Great Britain in last two centuries ago, still hunting wild animals for foods while use animal skins for clothes. While the Chinese is already using silk and cotton for clothes.😅😅😅. Guess some one is trying to rewrite history.😅😅
@WayneBryant-b2e12 күн бұрын
Pants on fire
@galupas10 күн бұрын
Russia did the same thing and really pissed off the Poms
@AndrewAustinFrustrated9 күн бұрын
@@galupas The only time we got pissed off was when the kuznetsov sailed through spewing smoke like an old steam ship, Russian ships routinely transit the channel and we couldn't care less.
@amandarhodes40729 күн бұрын
@@AndrewAustinFrustrated Technically not true. See the bellow. Kamchatka & 2nd Russian pacific squadron. The story of how a Russian fleet almost started ww1 6 years early by shear incompetence.
@AndrewAustinFrustrated8 күн бұрын
@@amandarhodes4072 No the UK only got angry then because the incompetent Russian imperial navy fired at British fishing trawlers and gave no advance notice they would be sailing so close to British territory. For well over a century the royal navy has shadowed foreign warships as they pass by nearly always having advance notice of those ships.
@amandarhodes40727 күн бұрын
@@AndrewAustinFrustrated NO it's well documented that the Russian ships fired and sunk several of the fishing vessels. Had they only turned up unannounced the Royal navy would have been sent out just to shadow the ships not prepare so go to war. The Royal navy squadron sent was on a war footing right up until Russia admitted they made a mistake and apologised.
@ioanbota93978 күн бұрын
Its interestyng
@blueboxvaccine533510 күн бұрын
Grabber Worms...
@ismith99592 күн бұрын
Blue print of another countries ship. Any opportunity to spy, looking for communication cables
@davidellis814111 күн бұрын
China is about to claim ENGLISH channel as there’s. No I’m not serious. I’m surprised the ships didn’t break down getting this far.
@radiosnail8 күн бұрын
To be fair Chinese ships are probably in better shape than the Russian ones.
@msafiriathumani56928 күн бұрын
Do u think that Chinese warship is a toy that can break easily and cannot reach that far, their machines are the best, and can even navigate around the earth several times!
@raymondwong37396 күн бұрын
The China Navy has better ships than UK.. by number and by advancing....periods! I know you don't want to admit it but the British Navy showed its imcompetent already!
@gillesmaumus40339 күн бұрын
🥱......
@王王老五-o9h11 күн бұрын
Do, why you come to Taiwan strait
@TheMrFarkle6 күн бұрын
Too much repetitive blabbing.
@Paulo-ov4yo11 күн бұрын
There's nothing to worry about. They'd be at the bottom of the English Channel very quickly.
@grovestreetboss551911 күн бұрын
💪💪
@MarvinChenFantasy9 күн бұрын
UK's leaking carrier can't promise that.
@raymondwong37396 күн бұрын
Good job you have that confident..lmfao!🤣🤣🤣That's what the British Navy got left!
@patrickyoon919112 күн бұрын
China is practicing the freedom of navigation in international water. So UK has any problem with it.?😅😅😅.UK has send naval ships to South China Sea in name of freedom of navigation in international water?Why can't the Chinese Navy do the same,?Why double standard.?😅😅😅
@luciusesox1luckysox57012 күн бұрын
Who's side are you on... ?
@Frost-0112 күн бұрын
What double standards? Nothing happened, both sides did the same thing, media channels just like this regardless of sides will almost always blow things out of proportion in a biased or unbiased way anyway.
@raylp475112 күн бұрын
Don't panic. They were just dropping off orders from TEMU.
@khorweesiong11 күн бұрын
They send ships over to European waters, you send ships over to Asian waters. In both cases, the “home” fleet escorts the “visitor” through it’s waters. Warships have been encountering each other for centuries and there is no reason for either side to overreact. All ships handled the encounter professionally and as long as there are no belligerent intentions, there is little risk of accidental hostilities provided all navies act professionally and communicate clearly
@Fleshox19-uz3qt11 күн бұрын
You're talking utter nonsense. It's international waters so what double standards are you talking about? Both France and UK navies sail those waters and they wouldn't be remotely bothered as they can watch them in case the Chinese ships sink from a naval or aerial attack. So long as they sail it n by and don't leave COVID virus, there's nothing to worry about.
@stevencher996811 күн бұрын
China has finally decided to return the favor freedom of navigation but at least they have not invaded like the opium wars, alliance of 8 nations and imperial japan bombing Shanghai from the Chinese harbor. This response has been a century late.
@crazyt1ger0811 күн бұрын
Or we could say China is indisputable Mongolian territory, after all they did own it for a time and what is good for the goose is good for the gander.
@Changansh11 күн бұрын
@@crazyt1ger08 Most Mongols live in China, one of 56 ethnic groups😊
@crazyt1ger0811 күн бұрын
@@Changansh Oh, you mean the just under 6 million Mongols that mostly live in Inner Mongolia that the PLA annexed just after WW2, no I was talking about the just under 3 million Mongolians that live in Mongolia......or does it only count when China does the annexing?
@newton1831111 күн бұрын
@@crazyt1ger08 And Tebet
@stevencher996811 күн бұрын
@@crazyt1ger08 Go learn some Chinese history. There were many dynasties that ruled China before the mongols. The Ming dynasty toppled the yuan dynasty(mongols), the Qing dynasty defeated the Ming dynasty and whichever party took over the country becomes the legitimate government. lf the mongols conquered China can rule over the country, likewise Mongols has to pay the price of defeat and Mongolia could be ruled by the victor. Things go both ways not a one way street. By your logic Mongolia can invade China and rule but China cannot rule over Mongolia when it's defeated? For your knowledge, there were Xia, Shang, Zhou, Qin, Han, Tang, Sung and Ming dynasties who ruled China before the Yuan(mongols) and you think China belongs to Mongolia?
@hens_ledan9 күн бұрын
The law of the sea is a quid pro quo. If the Chinese want access to international sea lanes close to other nations territories, then they must do the same. If they stop traffic through the South China Sea, then it is quite possible all Chinese vessels will be banned from sea lanes around the world. The Chinese know this and as a trading nation this would be entirely self-defeating. It's all flexing muscles and that's all it is.
@raymondwong37396 күн бұрын
Why would China ban the international rights to pass in South China Sea or any international water for commercial vessels? Military vessels however is another story don't you think?
@biketech6010 күн бұрын
I believe the American Navy reconnaisance plane was struck by the much more maneuverable fighter jet . For diplomatic reasons , neither plane's pilot was listed as causing this , so both sides could claim the upper hand . In such collisions it is often the smaller , lighter craft at fault . Your statement avoided neutraliy , therefore you support China .
@raymondwong37396 күн бұрын
The question should be "why should the American Navy reconnaisance plane" keeping spying on China and causing security threats to China's sovereignty? And on China's report on that incident, the american plane navigate towards the China fighter jet purposedly to knock it out of the sky!
@KAZUYADOG11 күн бұрын
Weerz French.
@amandarhodes40729 күн бұрын
Too busy escorting illegal immigrants boats to England.
@freemenofengland2880Күн бұрын
Yawn.....
@peterbooth280410 күн бұрын
Were they lost perhaps?
@msafiriathumani56928 күн бұрын
No way, they knew what they were doing, with navigational devices in place is not easy to miss the destination, Chinese use their own satellite - BeiDou with more and high accuracy than others!
@luciusesox1luckysox57012 күн бұрын
Pmsl... the rich heritage of the wonderful Chinese Navy.. scary stuff :)
@pauldean863811 күн бұрын
Ha ha ha go get a reality check “ grifters at the pentagon “ that’s the US admiral admitting they screwed facing China . So you think we got a better fleet than the US ? And they can’t stop that threat . Your an average joe so go watch what the professionals say !
@raymondwong37396 күн бұрын
That's what everyone in the west with dreams all saying it.. but even the us Navy worry????
@MatiHakimi10 күн бұрын
🦅🇬🇧
@jindelos317711 күн бұрын
Your video clip is not match What you said You putting all kind of clip With othet country warship 😂😂😂😂😂
@Bereadyalways12311 күн бұрын
The Chinese Navy makes the UK Navy look like. 6 year old kid in a boxing match with a professional heavyweight boxer…the UK military now is the joke of the world.
@newton1831111 күн бұрын
You really think so, Britian has some of the most advanced toys in its box that China dreams of.
@Bereadyalways12311 күн бұрын
@ Wishful out of date FORLORN HOPE, your living in the past glory, I have lived in mainland China for a few years, it has more nuclear missiles to destroy the UK a thousand times over, it’s airforce with near 4,000 combat latest jets etc, its Navy with 730 warships, submarines 68 and half are now nuclear powered. and active duty soldiers over TWO MILLION plus reserve force of 3,4 million…the UK lives in its past glory’s, stupid naive little insignificant country trying to box well above its weight. Living on memories only.
@mac26268 күн бұрын
A six year old with the best, and quietest nuclear subs on the planet. You’re obviously not the sharpest tack in the box.
@Bereadyalways1238 күн бұрын
@ Did you see the last two UK missile failures, The Chinese can detect any submarine under sea, there decades ahead, even landed on the dark side of the moon, the only moon the UK can show is drunken idiots pulling them trousers and pants off PISSED, your living in LA LA land ..
@robertwren88783 күн бұрын
We are the royal navy! We dont lose! Neither does its people!