RTX 5060 Benchmark Leak!!! RTX 5080 Release date! RDNA4 Leak and MORE GPU NEWS!!!!!1!!(pi)^Cos(pi/2)

[@danielowentech]

Fund your GPU upgrade by selling your old hardware at Jawa! jawa.link/OwenJan24 Use code OWEN10 for $10 off your first purchase!

[@brokeandtired]

I am still fine on my RX6650XT. If Nvidia is still 8GB next time im probably going AMD or Intel.

[@tonkatoytruck]

I have three AM4 PCs. When I do upgrade my daily driver, my other two machines get a free upgrade!!!

[@igelbofh]

Prices on Jawa are delusional

[@samgragas8467]

It doesn't matter if a 8 GB GPU is as fast as a 4070. If you are VRAM-limited, you lose access to Frame Generation and good textures.

[@Hydra_X9K_Music]

Just don't use ultra textures and you're fine

[@samgragas8467]

$350 probably to see mud and without Frame Generation on day one. Deal!

[@HifeMan]

@@Hydra_X9K_Musicsounds like they should just give it more VRAM at that point. How does this only have 2 more GB over my old 2060 from 6 years ago? lol

[@РаЫо]

Nah games use 6gb on average. Nvidia is gonna cook hard this gen

[@Hydra_X9K_Music]

@HifeMan I dont get the obsession with running everything at the absolute highest setting possible. It's a waste of performance. In many games, high or even medium sometimes looks almost the same as ultra (maybe a bit of a difference) but is way better for performance.

[@flatfish-d9o]

Once again here to request a look at the history of generational GPU price:performance improvement over the years 🙏

[@Cam_Wight]

lmao, you made it

[@SayachanQQ]

🙏

[@GoblinArmyInYourWalls]

@@flatfish-d9o wouldn't be the same without you

[@iitzfizz]

Bro is a bot

[@РаЫо]

What's there to see? Nvidia improves like crazy

[@henson2k]

I had 8GB of VRAM on GTX1070 8 years ago. Have the same in 2025 is ridiculous.

[@Rapunzel879]

8GB makes sense only for 1080P gaming. You can forget about productivity (Adobe etc.)

[@ryleelaking7882]

@@Rapunzel879 even at 1080p 8gb isnt enough

[@ertanouuuu]

Even for 1080p it's starting to become an issue. I have an Rx 6800 and I have a 1080p monitor but there are plenty of games that use 10 to 12 gb of vram in ultra ​@@Rapunzel879

[@Rapunzel879]

@@ertanouuuu Oof

[@flexzii6772]

@ryleelaking7882 Don't forget that the 5060 8GB of Vram is also around 30% faster than the 4060 8GB Vram

[@lgnfve]

good news, NVIDIA heard the public about VRAM on the 5060 and have moved it to 4gb. lol

[@tilapiadave3234]

Best news coming fast ,, AMD finally understands it simply cannot compete and leaves the GPU market

[@lgnfve]

@@tilapiadave3234 who could have predicted Intel would the be value king. lol

[@tilapiadave3234]

@@lgnfve Me . And next prediction Intel will take back the performance crown in CPU's within 3 years. 2-3nm on the way and they are the only FAB with that technology

[@SteedDigital1]

3.5*

[@xjax8519]

​@@tilapiadave3234 In your dreams ))

[@ilbro7874]

The less you buy, the more you save -Nvidia prolly

[@Sevastous]

8gb of ram but %33 faster= Oh boy get ready for some endless Texture popins and problematic global illumination

[@winio437]

Buy 5060ti 16 gb instead

[@sirab3ee198]

Don't worry, Nvidia will sell a new "gimmick feature" that makes the 8GB VRAM become 16GB in their own benchmarks. Neural rendering etc, whatever Zotac leaked a few days ago.

[@emma6648]

@@winio437exactly what Nvidia planned, make the lower end GPU’s so trash to the point you have no choice but to buy their more expensive ones Or not buy Ngreedia

[@ctrl_x1770]

​@@emma6648 90% chance AMD will also drop the ball, which means our only trust is Intel, a line I never thought was possible.

[@haukikannel]

This will sell like hotcakes!

[@ctrl_x1770]

In the future we'll get 9060 with 8GB of VRAM and STILL have people defend Nvidia.

[@GForceIntel]

That's impossible. That'll happen around the year 2060. By that time, gaming will no longer be the same. Once AI kicks in development of things, it will speed up 10 fold, which is around 2030. Gaming in from a TV or monitor will a thing of the past. Virtual reality will be the new more robust choice for everyone.

[@haukikannel]

Best selling GPU at 2027!

[@SapiaNt0mata]

do you know why 5060=8gb? most played games on PC: Fortnite, PUBG, Minecraft, League of Legends, etc. no need for more than 8gb. best-selling rtx 4000 = 4060 = 8gb. 5060 will be 8gb cause there are data that show it don't need more. and people that play these games know that they don't need 12gb or 16gb so they will buy 5060 8gb.

[@Macheako]

@@SapiaNt0mata oh, so then they can drop the price then? ❤

[@tomynaumann]

​@@SapiaNt0mata You can get a B580 with 12gb of Vram for 250 bucks, that will easily run Fortnite, Pubg, Cod and anything else at 1080p high. What we want is something that makes sense for the price we're paying.

[@PCPAyLOAD]

The whole vram stagnation issue with these lower end cards is probably the biggest issue recommending them. 30% ish faster only to have to lower graphics settings to get it at a likely higher price is anti-consumer.

[@tilapiadave3234]

Creating a product that sells is pro consumer ( Nvidia) , creating products that are laughed at ( AMD ) is anti consumer

[@PCPAyLOAD]

@tilapiadave3234 Fanboying a multi-billion dollar corporation is very anti-cosumer.. But please educate me lol

[@tilapiadave3234]

@@PCPAyLOAD Educate you ,,, I can do miracles but cannot do the impossible

[@Unknown-wd7ub]

​@@tilapiadave3234 the anti competitive behaviours like heavily limiting gpu supply to anyone that touches amd on a company level and making it so amd cannot be used in certain applications is so pro consumer . Also locking down all information about your gpus so anything that isn't windows cannot run stable unless it's specifically optimized by nvidia itself is also very friendly .

[@PCPAyLOAD]

@tilapiadave3234 OMG you are so much smarter than everyone! I just cannot wait to be graced with your infinite knowledge. Please,. Do continue..

[@Djoki1]

It can be faster than a 4090, if it has 8gb for nvidia prices its DOA for modern games. Its like shoving a 600hp engine in a 1970s Fiat 500 with bald tires.

[@haukikannel]

And it will be the best selling GPU at 2025… so how does it matter? Jensen will afford new leather jacket in anyway!

[@adriancioroianu1704]

You keep using this DOA slang talking about the most popular gpu's in every generation. Never rings any sanity bells? I mean someone is definetily delusional.

[@kevinerbs2778]

Great on the drag track, terrible on couses with turns.

[@3dcomrade]

​@@adriancioroianu1704 its definitrly DOA compared to 4060,3060,2060 and 2060 at release Also, the majority isnt always right. People can make the wrong choices you know

[@FenrirAlter]

​@@3dcomradecorrect + the numbers are gonna be inflated since oems use those gpus in prebuilts a lot. The 4060 already didn't sell that good compared to the 4070 and up. In the steam hardware survey the 4060 might be the 3rd most used gpu, but then again compared to older gens it doesn't even have double the 4070 %. Even on mindfactory(German hardware seller) you can see this trend.

[@burakozc3079]

b580 is %10 faster than 4060. 5060 is %30 faster than 4060. b580 is %20 slower than 5060 yet %20 cheaper and has 12gb vram. So b580 is a little bit better for its price.

[@haukikannel]

And sell tiny fraction what 5060 will sell… so… nothing new in the GPU department.

[@PeypaMikko-1842]

We don't know 5060's price yet, so your calculation is quite irrelevant.

[@ChrisZukowski88]

​@@PeypaMikko-1842do you really need to know!? It's 100% going to be a garbage price. I only watch these Nvidia videos to laugh and insult people.

[@SapiaNt0mata]

5060 being 30% faster than 4060 is enough for the majority to buy 4060 over B580. you'll ask "why?". most played games on PC: Fortnite, PUBG, Minecraft, League of Legends, etc. there's no need for more than 8gb.btw, only League of Legends has 140 million monthly active users=MAU. to get an idea how big this number is, ps4+5 have 116 million MAU. 24 million less MAU than LoL which is a PC exclusive game. best-selling rtx 4000 = 4060 = 8gb. 5060 will be 8gb cause there are data that show it don't need more. and people that play these games i mentioned know that they don't need 12gb or 16gb, so they will buy the gpu that has performance and not more Vram. 4070 at $600 sold more units than 7600 at $300=half price. price is not the definitive factor to make people buy Nvidia. it's not enough. people have brand loyalty, and when Nvidia has 88% AIB market share, there's a lot of them brand loyalists. it's like people that will buy the $1,500 Iphone instead of a cheaper phone cause of brand loyalty. Nvidia is the Iphone of GPU, but there's no Samsung equivalent like in phones.

[@MARCO-rq2ph]

But without dlss of frame gen,so Nvidia still better😂

[@Benieg83]

Can confirm this is legit. I live in the same area this test was performed, all the lights dimmed for a few minutes and a few unit complexes lost power, when the card was turned on a few blocks away. Definitely a 50 series card.

[@tilapiadave3234]

Winter there , make sure you get your Radeon card going to warm the entire State

[@tilapiadave3234]

New Government energy Policy here in Australia ,, all Radeon GPU's are to be banned

[@Benieg83]

@@tilapiadave3234 Sounds like some upside down, convict bull shit to me. Surprised they let you have computers down there.

[@tilapiadave3234]

@@Benieg83 Just LOVE baiting the AMD mummy basement dwellers ,,, soon Radeon will be no more ,,,, Fantastic news

[@Benieg83]

@@tilapiadave3234 And then Intel can charge even more for their cards. Lack of competition is bad for everyone.

[@Ladioz]

The main thing im looking forward to is a 4090 vs 5080 game benchmark

[@hunn20004]

Going by how many cores it has, 5080 is going to be mildly faster than the 4080 super, but much slower than the 4090. The only interesting feature is the new neural thing. Keep an eye out for 1600$ 4090s.

[@STKReacts]

@@hunn200045080 gonna be bottlenecked at 4k with 16gb compared to 4090

[@kjellbeats]

​@@STKReactscompared to 4090 sure, but I don't think 16 gb will become a big problem very soon

[@STKReacts]

@ in a world where there are 16gb cards going for 350$ it feels like robbery when you’re paying over 1200$+ for the same bus width and vram as less expensive options

[@Annihilation99]

​@@kjellbeatsit already is. Look at indian jones game with PT on

[@christophermullins7163]

The comment guy deserves an award... Here you go guy 🏆🏆🏆

[@dolan_plz]

and he asked nicely with 🙏 emoji 😶‍🌫

[@FO0TMinecraftPVP]

We WILL buy the 5090 even if it costs 5k

[@CurtOntheRadio]

He should have done the work himself. Would take less effort than asking same question for months. Duh.

[@B_Machine]

🏆

[@christophermullins7163]

​@@FO0TMinecraftPVPI'll buy it for $1200 🤷 just a limit to what makes sense just to have your games look a bit prettier than a $500 GPU.

[@vshade]

The 1060 was 299 for the founders edition, the partners msrp was 249

[@TabalugaDragon]

Power limit isn't the problem for laptop 4070, it's the specs. Aside from having 50% more memory, desktop 4070 has 50% wider memory bus and 28% more cores. Laptop 4080 is the perfect proof that you don't need a lot of power for high performance, it performs about 30% better than 4070m at the same 100 watts and about 50-60% better at the full power limit. It's what laptop 4070 should have been, not a misnamed 8GB 4060 ti that it actually is. Desktop 4070 also loses less than 10% of its performance when its limited to laptop 3070 ti power limit(150w)

[@Xilent1]

I admire that guys level of persistence actually.

[@lukeludwig1055]

NVIDIA PAY MORE FOR LESS

[@РаЫо]

5060 300$ 4070 super power AMD is cooked

[@kishin9]

@@РаЫо $300 for an 8GB VRAM CRT monitor GPU is way too much they need to drop the price another $50+.

[@РаЫо]

@@kishin9 Running every game at 1440p Ultra at 100 fps for 250? Makes sense

[@tilapiadave3234]

AMD always less ,, always NON competitive ,, always only sold to fanboys

[@YogyBear]

@@РаЫо You're not running Ultra textures at 1440p on modern games with an 8GB VRAM buffer... let alone with any kind of Raytracing enabled. Why are fanboys like this?

[@thomasbolman375]

I expect the 5060 to have a MSRP of $399. Jensen will give a 30% uplift to the price, to match the performance. Late this year a 12Gb version will be released just before Black Friday/Cyber Monday. That 5060Ti will cost $499.

[@DeepteshLovesTECH]

My current RTX 4060 laptop in 3dmark timespy graphics (115W 2745MHz core clock) : 11500 points. So the 5060 mobile performance is basically the same as a 4070 mobile or slightly below a 4060Ti Desktop. Oh and 8GB VRAM.. sighs... DIY PC builders may be shocked to hear that 5070M still packs 8GB VRAM (70 class on mobile still on 8GB VRAM since 1070M).

[@KahnJsu]

Nah, this time 12gb comes to 5070. 4070 already get cut, this time it will not. Nvidia do this already with 3060, i think this will be pattern

[@KrYPTzx]

not to mention that the current Laptop SKUs are voltage limited until the 4070. So they don't even perform to their full potential. Nvidia may as well have increased the limit for the new generation.

[@TabalugaDragon]

@@KahnJsu are you sure about that? Because all leaks point to 5070m still having 8GB

[@chuggaaskarmory]

Daniel, the price to performance chart is off because the 1060 6gb had an MSRP of only $249. This was back when Nvidia charged more for the founders cards which made it cost $299.

[@Randy28CR]

Another GPU completely stopped by VRAM? No thanks. Not again to me, Ngreedya.

[@shbddh]

Gayvidia 😅

[@haukikannel]

No worry 5060 will be best selling GPU at 2025 so NVIDIA will be happy!

[@Randy28CR]

@@haukikannel we are fked up man...

[@shbddh]

@@haukikannel that's true, most of people are dumb :)

[@thehunk1]

​@@shbddh that's why I don't fight console people anymore, if you're just that dumb to defend Nvidia cutting on the VRAM of their cards then just stay on console.

[@hierox4120]

13:30 - I don't think it makes a whole lot of sense saying that 30% improvement in (perf ratio)/(price ratio) means it is in line with a typical generation. I am assuming you are coming from the point that you already have an existing gen card and are planning to upgrade to the next. As noted in your data, even when it is 1.38, the performance over the previous gen is only 1.1. There is nothing generational about it. Put in another way, sure, it is 1.38, but does it justify spending that money to upgrade to a 1.1 performance increase. And if you currently don't have a GPU, and you are actively looking for one, that 1.38 ratio is meaningless anyway.

[@mathesar]

Whatever the case may be don't buy the 5060 if it only has 8GB VRAM, hopefully they at least offer a 12GB 5060 variant. I've been using a 3060 Ti 8GB since 2021 and the main reason I'm wanting to upgrade is due to 8GB becoming more of an issue lately.

[@haukikannel]

Don`t worry! 5060 will be the best selling GPU in 2025!

[@mathesar]

@@haukikannel ya unfortunate but true based on Steam hardware survery history.

[@SapiaNt0mata]

@@mathesar most played games: Fortnite, PUBG, Minecraft, League of Legends, etc. no need more than 8gb, so we don't need steam survey. btw, this is a big oof moment: LoL has 140 million monthly active users=MAU as PC exclusive game. ps4+5 combined have 116 million MAU. only LoL has more MAU than ps4+5. and in 2024 LoL MAu increased by 20 million compared to 2023(120 million=still more MAU than PS in 2024) while PS dropped by 7 million MAU=123 million in 2023.

[@lucidluhx6088]

@@SapiaNt0mata did u deadass just say "big oof moment" in 2025

[@XanYT]

Am I wrong into thinking those ratios should have been calculated with inflation and it would have been more accurate if it was? Inflation is not consistent over time. A price change of $50 one gen is not the same as $50 in another.

[@Iceman-hb3uk]

Intel digging its own grave more each month in the CPU department while absolutely smashing it in the GPU department is a wild statement, but it's true...

[@lanelesic]

I would like to add a small thing to the generational improvements considerations for the 60 class gpus you did. The 1060 6GB could run every game released before 2016. at 1080p and high settings (not the ultra preset but reasonable mix of high, ultra and medium settings that overall can be equivalent to High preset) and at reasonable fps. GTX 960 wasn't really there. 2060 6GB was struggling with some games released in years close to 2019. And it was RTX in name only, maybe for Quake 2 RTX. 4060 8GB is the worst in this regard.

[@arlynnfolke]

8gb vram is okay if it priced correctly (i.e 200$ is the most acceptable, considering 250$ has b580 having 12gb vram). plus.. it's RTX, aren't we talking bout raytracing cuz that's the purpose of rtx right??.. but isn't it ray tracing, dlss, and stuffs cost some vram? so why keep the 8gb vram when your features need more than just 8gb vram? idk what nvidia thinking, i assume they just wanted us to buy their highest card as possible which is too expensive for most people. ima hope Intel and AMD just straight forward make a new standard, which is atleast 10gb vram, OR if they want to sell 8gb card again, just price it correctly (e.g A580 8gb, it's only has msrp about 179$ for it's launch price). i know most of us may need more than 8gb vram, but i'm 100% sure 8gb vram will be beneficial for some other people that only can afford 200$ gpus (even for me, 200$ still too much for 8gb vram unless the performance really that fast).

[@sahraouirami6558]

exactly what I was thinking especially since intel joined the market

[@deathtoinfidelsdeusvult2184]

Dlss 2 doesnt cost more vram it eases the requirements of vram. Considering b580 still uses gddr6 as a new gen, of course they are gonna have to make it 12 GB.

[@pctechloonie]

Lol a 4060 TI for half the price isn't happen. Jensen needs money for the leather jackets. It's going to be 349$ and 5-10% faster > 4060 TI on desktop and probably still 8GB.

[@wombatillo]

Nvidia is clearly wanting to keep the high vram in the professional cards. Can't have AI researchers buying 4080 or 4090 cards if they can be nudged towards buying RTX 6000 Ada cards.

[@sahraouirami6558]

@pctechloonie also absolutely correct

[@carstenhansen5757]

I was SO close to buying a new setup, after my 1070 is showing signs of not being quite enough anymore. Going to wait and see now.

[@Manny444a]

Bro if your wifi is fast enough try geforce experience, it’s pretty limited in the game selection but it was super clutch when I couldn’t get my gpu right away

[@skeleton0_067]

Just buy something not from nvidia.

[@FenrirAlter]

I mean either wait for other gpus or buy used. If you can get a used 4070 super for around 400$ it's not bad

[@Choom2077]

@@Manny444a You mean "GeForce Now"??

[@BigAndTattooed]

Selling at jawa will guarantee that you will lose money on your cards. That place is a joke

[@Johnwick-ed7vo]

Truth, last time I looked into it, yeah they will get it sold but they also take a big profit from every sale, to a degree I'm good with that, they are hosting the site, and handle the money aspect of it all . Yet here's the kicker, this fella has actually did a video on it . Found the payment division was a bit higher indeed. Though never said it was to much. Also there's a few of the people that are indeed PC personality technology influencers, whatever you want to call them, that were very favorable to NZXT rental SCAM, so in my thinking to rely on these faces to sell the site and it's services. Really not good.Yeah they are 2 separate issues, yet go hand in hand in some ways

[@99mage99]

The cost of convenience is always steep. If you don't want a middle man taking a cut of your sale, don't use a middle man and sell your used PC hardware on Facebook market place or something similar.

[@davidg2731]

If you want to sell your video card on Jawa sell it yourself do not let Jawa buy it from you, they will only give you a fraction of what it's worth! Take some good photos that show it's condition and a short description, believe me it's worth it!

[@mikem6466]

Please do one of those tables for the 70 & 80 class of cards too!

[@krzysztof7374]

40 series is a price to performance drop for 80 class

[@Rachit0904]

GTX 1060 6GB had an initial price of $299 for the Founder’s Edition but its MSRP was $249. So your chart understates the improvement with GTX 1060 and overstates the improvement with RTX 2060.

[@fishjohn014]

Get a Rx 6800

[@TalonsTech]

The Arrow Lake ME firmware latency bug has already been fixed. It was a beta bios and not official. Official release of bios came out yesterday and has fixed ME.

[@ihgtn4824]

(pi)^Cos(pi/2) = 1

[@winio437]

And what?

[@corebite]

Neat

[@SmaskysButler]

what?! I thought it =!?

[@H786...]

@@SmaskysButler cos pi/2 is 0 and anything to powwr of 0 is 1

[@H786...]

@@SmaskysButler oh youre being funny

[@chrisnesbitt_jr]

One more factor to consider when comparing generational performance increase is the difference between entry level and high end GPUs. With the 10-30 series we saw the 60 class GPUs offering atleast 50% of the performance of the 90/Titan class. However with the 40 series that gap grew to the point that the 4090 was 3 times as powerful as the 4060… In other words, if overall GPU performance grows by MORE than 30% across the board, then the 60 class only offering a 30% increase for the same price is actually a bad value.

[@TechOverwrite]

Happy new year Daniel, and this video must be a relief to that commenter guy 😅

[@JustYash7890]

Can't they give it atleast 10gb VRAM?

[@Headloser]

The 5060 offers 8 GB GDDR7 graphics memory with a 128-bit memory bus. WTF? Seriously?? It should be 12 -16 GB GDDR7 and 192 - 256-bit memory bus. NO way I buying this. It no future-proof.

[@haukikannel]

So buy 5080 or 5090 Jensen approw! 😂

[@stevenwest1494]

It would need to be 12gb of GDDR6 or 6X at most to keep prices down.

[@johnc8327]

16GB of VRAM on an entry level GPU? lol You guys are a bit crazy on this VRAM stuff.

[@95928225]

@@johnc8327 1070 had 8gb vram as entry level in 2016. Why not having 12gb vram in 2025 after 9 years.

[@IronMan-jj2fd]

That's the whole point, they don't wanna make it future proof, so consumers keep buying when they launch new GPUs 💀, it's the sad reality!

[@brianpfrost]

I'm guessing the N44, like N24 (RX6400/6500XT) was intended for use in laptops. Specifically AMD CPU based laptops which already have video encoders in the integrated GPU. Does make them suck as GPUs for add-in cards.

[@od1sseas663]

Even if it was 4090 performance, with 8GB it just isn't worth it

[@winio437]

Buy 5060ti instead

[@puffyips]

@@winio437no 😂

[@FenrirAlter]

​@@winio437for 15-20% more performance with the same amount of vram?

[@beardguy788]

I literally have a 4070 super arriving today. I dont know if i should send it back, or if the new cards are going to be too expensive. Rough.

[@FrancescoLitro]

Tbh didnt see the 4060 do so well price to performance ratio

[@stromo_182model]

The price/performance analysis is great to see. Something I haven't seen elsewhere. Please make time to do the same for the 80 and 90 series (when you have decent 5080 and 5090 info)

[@ertai222]

Happy new year

[@ookami-chan3328]

now we have (pi)^Cos(pi/2) = (pi)^0 = 1 instead of simply more 1?!

[@NickChapmanThe]

If I may, sir, I would recommend you consider two or more line column headers to assist in legibility.

[@J3f3R20n]

$349 at the very least for that 5060. Just watch it.

[@laszlozsurka8991]

Yeah right... try $499

[@haukikannel]

$400 sounds more likely… but lets see. If you look the speed $350 sounds sensible.

[@chy.0190]

@@laszlozsurka8991 why? 4060 was 299 lmao

[@laszlozsurka8991]

@@chy.0190 You think NGREEDIA won't charge you more for GDDR7 memory and because it's a new generation? Have you seen the price leak for the 5080 and 5090? 5060 is easily gonna be $499. We're talking about the same company that charged an extra $100 for 8GB more on the 4060 Ti.

[@aboomination897]

That would be a pleasant surprise, I am half expecting 500$.

[@rithuikrajeev8039]

Hi Daniel, I haven't received any notification for 24h2 update on windows. Is this due to ongoing stability issues with 24H2?

[@moto6981]

If Nvidia prices the RTX 5060 at $399, they're handing the mid-range market to AMD and Intel. But at $200? Gamers would be all over it!

[@lucachrist1645]

I wouldnt even buy it at 100$ bc of the vram

[@Wobbothe3rd]

The 3060 12gb cost more than that and it still has sold more than AMD's ENTIRE LINE-UP right now to this very day.

[@SapiaNt0mata]

7600 compete with 4060. 7700 beats it. 4070 at $600 sold more units than both. do you know what this means? brand loyalty. look at Iphone. Nvidia is the Iphone of GPU. you can't take people that are loyal to the brand with better price. and unlike Intel that messed up and AMD demolished them, Nvidia has seen this and they won't mess up like Intel.

[@Macheako]

@@Wobbothe3rd it hasn’t “held up” man…..it’s just a lotta ppl don’t have much of a gd choice in todays market 😂😂

[@adriancioroianu1704]

That's exactly what people who are watching too much certain youtube channels, or browse too much certain forums keep saying every gen and reality keeps slapping them, yet they keep getting baited. For example, i can bet my house that 9/10 of the people who talk only about vram for the last 4 years are hardware unboxed fans and see steve like some sort of father figure. I recently checked a HU video coincidently and steve was still defending his takes about how better choice were his amd more vram recommendations over nvidia counterparts, because now you can play games with 30 fps on average on a 5yo card with low settings but, hey, at least you can turn textures to ultra, while on 5-6y nvidia counterparts you can't raytrace. Not exactly his words, he is very "polite" and vague, but basically this is it if he was completely honest and direct. I mean, the guy clearly is challenged on this topic and he's really the main reason for comment sections endlesly talking about vram even to this day, because of his past crusades on this topic, which led to some people being disappointed and other people circle jerking in comment sections for years being mostly delusional or unreasonable at a minimum.

[@randyrrs7028]

Curious to see if the 5060 will at least match the performance of a 3070

[@ZaeBae22]

BASED commenter not giving up lol also not buying a new gpu until 16gb vram under 500$

[@AlyxSharkBite-2000]

AMD not doing hardware encoders on the low end makes the B580 loo even batter as Intel's HW Encoders are fantastic

[@ItzVic]

Happy new year Daniel

[@erelpc]

Looking forward to some information on the RTX 5050.

[@gabber_]

spending money on less than 16GB Vram in 2025 is like shooting myself in the foot. hopefully the 70TI will be at least affordable. or the 9070XT will be competitive. idk, looks pretty grim either way.

[@1989DieJay]

5060 ti maybe with 16 GB

[@skeleton0_067]

@@1989DieJayand it’s gonna cost a lot of money like 4060ti 16gb? (4060ti cost almost as same as 7800xt…)

[@puffyips]

Yeah I’m glad I have a 16gb card that’s powerful enough to let me wait these terrible generations out

[@1989DieJay]

@skeleton0_067 The 7800XT is really a good card. I hope for the successor.

[@Ktvk-xe8pg]

question is, price, buy 4080 super now or wait for 5070 ti

[@laszlozsurka8991]

If the 5080 will cost $1,600 based on latest leaks then the 5070 Ti is definitely gonna be a $1,000. No way NVIDIA would leave a big price gap between a 5070 Ti and 5080 especially if the 5070 Ti uses the same die as the 5080.

[@FenrirAlter]

Just wait till ces. Then we will get more info

[@PohnnyRico]

nobody is buying budget for streaming gaming and av1 for streaming is going to take another 2 years until it comes for every little streamer...

[@NoOne-yp1qe]

Mind if I ask, since I don't know a lot about this. I need to do an insane amount of video encoding, but not professionally, just personal stuff and I sorta need the support for encoders. As you only mentioned streamers, I'm hoping that the news he talked about won't affect me then?

[@SyntaxDaemon]

I am probably one of the few people who actually does use Windows Mixed Reality. I happen to still be on Windows 10 for the time being, but weird that they would actively stop it from working rather than simply letting it continue without support.

[@YigitCanAydinSS]

Change the title to RTX 5060 Laptop benchmark leak.

[@TabalugaDragon]

yeah because having 95% of the desktop version's performance is a totally different level!

[@TiagoFilipeCabral]

5060 leaks are surprising as i was expecting the first release of the 5000 series to include only the 70 80 and 90 versions since the 60s are usually cut down dyes and that selection is usually made after the best ones are selected, usually takes a few months unless of course they went into production a few months ago in which case what is surprising is the fact that we are only getting leaks now provided they are not assembled in North Korea

[@collbuss5358]

That guy can stop commenting now lmao

[@ilbro7874]

Nah he commented on this video still, dont ever insinuate he needs to stop😢

[@jadedrivers6794]

The GTX 1060 6GB was my last Nvidia card, and for good reason. Seems people got used to being ripped off.

[@zaraizara2794]

Just grab an AMD card. It's dirt-cheap, loaded with massive VRAM, ridiculously powerful, and, of course, comes with all the Nvidia-stolen technology baked right in. Also don't forget the stolen Nvidia name too.

[@SilenceAtMidnight]

Isn't amd's top card a 4070 victim? Idk where you're getting half of that from but with how bad ngreedia is we might as well make our own gpus

[@tpf92]

For 900 series, $299 is a bit misleading since it was just the founders edition that was $299, non-founders had a $249 msrp, although n ot sure if the others did the same, for example the wiki for the GeForce 700 series says has "($219)" under the $249 msrp of the 760.

[@czarsv15]

8 gb vramthis card should have at least 10gb vram...

[@makingstatements812]

We're never getting an 80 series gpu for $700 ever again

[@Vincent-bw8vv]

With these Vram capacaties the 5060 and 5070 are almost DOA🤦‍♂️

[@tilapiadave3234]

But will still be vastly superior to the radeon offerings

[@ladrok97]

And still will sell in biggest numbers

[@haukikannel]

You are talking about best selling gpus of 2025.. so they will do great considering that they will be DOA!

[@tilapiadave3234]

@@haukikannel AMD will probably finally give up and pout of the market by 2026

[@chy.0190]

And then there is 5060 ti with 16GB lol

[@nsg619]

Do you think we'll get a Super/Ti refresh for the 50 series? We didn't for the 30 series.

[@Rspsand07]

I'm more impressed he can comment that often with KZbin hiding like 99% of comments for no reason.

[@ilbro7874]

The hiding is wild, literally no rhyme or reason to it 😅

[@adamkallin5160]

That’s a nice performance bump. What’s not nice is 8 GB of VRAM.

[@oktusprime3637]

Man, this guy is dedicated commenting on every video lmao

[@jayzn1931]

Jawa doesn’t have an option for selling a 3060 12GB. 😅

[@LotBoy87]

$8700 and requires 1.21 Gigawatts

[@jacobrotkowitz3978]

When can we expect pre orders to go live for the 5080? I want a white card if that changes things

[@icecube192]

Score like RTX 3070 its joke ?

[@Radek494]

Like 3070 and VRAM like 3070 as well xD

[@TabalugaDragon]

yes

[@markf6829]

I think I know what NVIDIA is doing. They are setting up for a TI version of all all the cards, with a 3GB module when it's ready. So let's take the 5090, its 16 modules of 2 GB per for a total of 32GB. This is the base 5090. I am less sure they will do what I am about to suggest on the 5090, as there may be a power consumption increase which makes it heat prohibitive, but essentially I am saying they will keep the die the same, and swap out the memory modules, so essentially with no retooling go from 32 to 48 GB on a 5090TI. Where this makes more sense is the 5080 being 8 X 2 GB modules going to 8 X 3 GB modules, and from 16GB to 24 GB for the 5080TI. Same for the 5070, have 6X 2GB modules, it would go from 12GB for the base 5070, to 18 GB for the 5070TI. Lastly, the 5060 is an 8 GB card, and while everyone is speculating the 5060 ti will be 16GB, that would only happen if they used the 5070 Die, which could be the case, but if they keep the 5060 Die, then it becomes a 12 GB OPP card, which is not a bad opening price point spec to be honest. Still, the bigger issue is their pricing. I hate that they discontinued the 40 series, basically they force people to the higher price 50 series, and the only reason to do that is that the 40 series was too close in raw performance and people would buy it over the 50 series to pay 1/2 the price. So they have essentially tipped their cards, saying the increase is marginal to the 50 series, by cancelling the 40 series.

[@shbddh]

5060 with 8gb lmao 😂😂😂 And gayvidia fans will buy 😂

[@winio437]

I will buy 60ti with 16gb😊

[@TabalugaDragon]

what would you suggest for a laptop instead of Nvidia then, huh?

[@Sintrania]

The only thing I want to point out in the data is the power consumption as well, While the 2060 is 59% faster than 1060 it did draw about 30% more power (120w tdp vs 160w tdp). A better comprehensive measure would be to take a performance per watt and compare that to the price increase. For example the 1060 and 960 have the same tdp so it's 172%/1.00(power diff) increase in performance, as for the 2060 it would be 159%/1.33 = 119.55% increase performance per watt. The 4060 is kinda interesting it only have 115w tdp and a lower price, if only it has more vram it would have been a killer of a card.

[@4evahodlingdoge226]

The 5060 laptop performing like a 4060 ti desktop is pretty good, looks like another generation for laptops where the xx60 and xx80 are the only two worth buying. If they want to sell the 5070 and 5090 laptops they need to give them more vram, 12-16 gb of vram for the 5070 & 24-32 gb of vram for the 5090 because charging $500 more for 10-15% performance makes no sense otherwise.

[@michaelbuto305]

The reason they leaks this faster than 5080 5090 is the fact that intel arc is seriously want to try to compete. Rtx 50 series feels like situation where 10 to 20 series. It just increase in everything including Watt and Heat which can be translated just a pain. We need more efficiency. Intel just really struck gold if they really want to compete but idk.

[@4evahodlingdoge226]

@@michaelbuto305 Bro retype that because that made no sense hhhaha. A guy shunt modded his 4090 laptop and got it to perform 25% better and got close to the 4080 desktop in performance, they need to give more juice to the high end laptops + more vram as they sell these for $4k.

[@Sc5ch]

​@4evahodlingdoge226 Main problem is and always will be thermal management. My 4060 laptop already sounds like a jet when I play Indiana Jones. I don't really know how they'd solve that issue without making the laptop weigh like a brick.

[@4evahodlingdoge226]

@@Sc5ch Depends on the laptop, you need to check reviews that include the noise levels + every laptop manufacturer has different modes, on turbo is the loudest but on a slightly slower mode it's fine.

[@TabalugaDragon]

it's not good. Look at how much faster the laptop 4080 is, not to mention laptop 4090 which are actually named 1 tier above their desktop versions.

[@Zarathustra-H-]

Techpowerups database is a bit murky, as none of their reviews include the exact settings they use for benchmarking.

[@thehunk1]

They seem to be on pair with hardware unboxed, and hardware unboxed has the best approach on testing, both on quality and quantity.

[@flatfish-d9o]

omg

[@vshade]

The next generation gpus will have access to 3GB memory modules, and there are rumors that the 5060 desktop will have 12gb(and probably 8 as well because nvidia)

[@veilmontTV]

This conparison actually shows that were not getting ripped off as bad as people think with the 4060. People just want pricing thats never coming back

[@Cpt.Teemo996]

Don't say that, we need to hate on Nvidia unconditionally

[@emanuelefusco4466]

there are also videos comparing gtx 1060 and rtx 4060 in games of their respective eras and in fact the performances are similar (without RT and dlss). I saw one of iceberg tech a few days ago. For some reason people woke up one day and started glorifying amd while hating nvidia at the same time, in the end they are both companies with profit as their goal. the only right move by amd in the last few years (in my opinion) was to ride the wave of panic about vram, doing so many people bought amd often believing (mistakenly) that anything under 16gb of vram is not enough.

[@_shreyash_anand]

I think people got hung up on the die size as a percentage of the flagship, which is fair, but the performance for the price is fine. I don't believe the outrage would have been anywhere near as bad if the 4060 kept the 12GB memory buffer of the 3060

[@veilmontTV]

@Cpt.Teemo996 theyre scummy but not nearly as the average nvidia hater think. They're winning at everything. Features performance and efficiency.

[@cxngo8124]

If the 4060 launched with 12gb I would agree. But it did not. Statistics can lie. Imagine if the generational improvements were judged based on games that use more than 8gb of VRAM. Then we would get the generational improvement, either below 1, or very close to one.

[@Bronwyn031]

It's so good to see the "Andy Dufresne" technique pay off! You keep right on mailing those book requests to the state board, Andy.

[@marvinrichards3]

only 3 views in 2 minutes? Bro fell off

[@MrAnimescrazy]

I am looking forward to the 5090 and the youtube benchmarks.

[@clownavenger0]

So those headsets people spent 700 or 800 dollars on will become bricks because they can't bother to introduce a patch that converts them into normal VR headsets?

[@stephengrinaker5085]

if they want to push that vram amount they will need to make dlss 4 baked into drivers and work on all games with the neural rendering stuff

[@Disco_Tek]

any recommendations for a new case for two GPU's? I think the 011 with one vertical and one in that weird front of case config is the only thing that makes sense?

[@zack9912000]

The amount of V ram is insulting

[@bhluschrean]

Everyone who says new gpus have worse price to performance they obviously forgot about 500$ gpus for 240p 30fps in 1990's

[@adrastoso9727]

It is hard to think the new 5000 series is rumored to be around 40% faster considering how fast the 4000 series is compared to the 3000 series and those series smaller jump over the 2000 series. Rumored prices for the 5080 and 5090 is even worse than the release price of the 4080/4090, and for gamers I do not think they will be worth it at this time in 2025.

[@Eric-ct2ri]

your 1060 price is a bit off since only the founders editions were 299$ aib were 250$ since nvidia wanted their cards to have a premium tax over aibs. ofcourse aibs had higher priced models like usual but their starting price was 250$ and nvidias founder card was 300$

[@HuseyinTugrulBuyukisik-i2l]

So laptop 5060 has 78% performance of desktop 4070. This is fast, probably because of mainly gddr7 bandwidth.

[@TabalugaDragon]

this is not fast. This is still much slower than laptop 4080.

[@HuseyinTugrulBuyukisik-i2l]

@@TabalugaDragon It is still fast enough for 90% of games. Those games with high requirements require more VRAM too.

[@TabalugaDragon]

@@HuseyinTugrulBuyukisik-i2l 90% of games if we count all games ever released? Sure. If we count modern AAA titles then it's not that good. I have a laptop 3070 ti which is about desktop 3070\laptop 4070 level, and I can't even max out Fortnite at stable 60 fps at 1080p quite often, not to mention way more demanding games. For a new, 60 class GPU it's not impressive. It's what 4060 should had been as the bare minimum.

[@HuseyinTugrulBuyukisik-i2l]

@@TabalugaDragon You are not wrong but the game makers are not optimizing the games anymore. Only few are optimized. It's not card's fault. Yes, 5060 is not fast enough and its because gamers are still paying the amount no matter what. Demand - something related economics. Just because a lot of gamers can buy that price, others have to do same. If you isolate the performance from other parameters like price, it is good performance.

[@TabalugaDragon]

@@HuseyinTugrulBuyukisik-i2l yes it is a card's fault if the higher end GPUs are so much faster. Like I said, look at the laptop 4080 which isn't even a real 4080, it has specs between desktop 4070 and 4070 ti, and yet it's very energy efficient and is very fast even in thermally-limited laptop form-factor. Nvidia deliberately made a huge gap between low end and high end. In 4000 series, laptops didn't even have a mid-range GPU.

[@Helmet_Von_Moldy]

Do you think Nvidia will release a 6090?

[@alfielebanna9841]

im pretty sure that the 1060 6gb was released at a n msrp of 250 usd not 300

[@imglidinhere]

13.8-14k gpu score is around the level of a 4060 Ti, so that's... okay I guess...? Was hoping for more than a 20% boost gen over gen. :/ That's a 6750XT, but only 8GB VRAM is going to be rough...

[@gaminginstilllife9429]

I wish you would go more into VR graphics and what the technology advances have come out. If it wasn't for my pimax crystal headset and my love of simulation and racing games I don't think that I would ever need anything stronger than I even a 4070 but now that I have a 9800 X 3D I feel like I have to get the 5090 to take advantage of the pimax max resolution

[@Fixer221b]

If you were my math teacher, I wouldve been a mathematician by now.. Thank you for always explaining so clearly and Happy New Year.

[@Headloser]

I wonder if somebody, down the road, is going to replace the 8 GB GDDR7 Graphic Memory with HIGHER SPEED AND MORE RAM, I would love to see the result.