UK Bad Drivers & Driving Fails Compilation | UK Car Crashes Dashcam Caught (w/ Commentary)

[@iluvgsds]

7:00 drives onto the pavement and nearly kills a pedestrian and the Police just let it go?

[@davidellis8141]

Yeah but you have to remember, no hurty words involved.

[@bobtudbury8505]

because they are cowards except when knocking on doors in gangs to arrest a woman for silent prayers

[@J1mston]

They look like they are in Tier 1.

[@johnmalin1676]

Yea, wasn't a white bloke

[@richaustin4991]

@@bobtudbury8505 what?

[@hozzer68]

#6 I’m assuming the vehicle has no registered keeper then, if that’s the case the reg needs put on the ANPR system to flag it up on cameras and police vehicles fitted with that system, it’s not complicated now is it ?

[@alanhall1219]

#6 that driver is definitely a menace, wonder if he’s even seen a test centre

[@menorahdarkness4877]

.. Both equally worthless buckets of slop I'd say

[@Scoupe400]

What did the passenger do? The reverse cam (shown as mirror image) shows the driver getting out of the car.

[@alanhall1219]

@@Scoupe400 your correct,

[@carlstyth8368]

0:49 Getting out the car, like they're going shopping.🤣🤣🤣

[@avastaley3379]

I know 😂 it’s like give it up and move on you muppets. Everyone thinks you’re an idiot right now.

[@alastairward2774]

#6 I always wonder what would happen if someone did that to a police officer, would they suddenly find the resources to identify and prosecute them?

[@paul8161]

Most probably.

[@Odysseuss.]

You have to ask.

[@MrTelboy1962]

#6 The police were unable to identify the Chief Constables son so the case was closed!

[@BadDriversCars]

Let’s all remember to drive responsibly and protect each other

[@adrianlloyd6403]

95% of road users do remember this simple and safe code but sadly there are 5% of idiots out there not interested in being considerate and safe on the roads and we have to share the same roads with these objectionable twerps.

[@Odysseuss.]

@@adrianlloyd6403 You are way off. At least 50/50 if not higher on the idiots side, then you have the deliberate actions you see on here.

[@adrianlloyd6403]

@@Odysseuss. Maybe my 5% is a gross underestimation......let's just agree there are too many of them!!!!!

[@taniablack5018]

U gay? 😂

[@paulncott4587]

That would be great, if only people who are capable of driving were allowed a licence. Unfortunately, licences are given to people who shouldn't be left alone in charge of a shopping trolley.

[@carlstyth8368]

7:55 He/she almost wiped out a child. Cant identify. Words fail me.

[@deebeeaitch]

Soon as they see he’s a bombaclat they won’t touch him.

[@atmywitsend1984]

I know. So they have a clear image of the cars registration,a very good image of a man's face,we have cameras everywhere in the uk,and somehow they can't trace the person that very nearly hit a school girl who was walking on a "foot path!!! In broad daylight. Yet they are putting people in jail for "hurty words" This country is broken beyond belief.

[@RJPhotographics]

9:15 yeahhhh send it lad!

[@comradeblyat25]

Pathetic. Clear view of driver plus registration plates but we cant identify him. But you drive in a bus lane and they can get your vin number and how many pores on your nose

[@alanhindmarch4483]

#4. How petty can people be. If they just let the suv turn and not argued, everyone could have got on with their day. #5. What a prat the BMW driver was, obviously trying to blame the Motorcyclist. #6. Police couldn’t identify the driver, rubbish. Letter to registered keeper, telling them to identify the driver at that time, if not the registered keeper ends up in court.

[@notacluebbq2500]

Maybe possibly Two-Teir-Keir policing right there, perhaps? Who knows? Please send this video to your local MP and demand that they take this up with either the Chief Constable or PCC!!!

[@macsmith6216]

No MOT on the Citroen what a a surprise

[@tosspot1305]

​@notacluebbq2500 💯 and making threats like that is deemed perfectly acceptable these days. That's an actual threat of terrorism and once again it gets ignored and nothing is followed up

[@robnicholson5171]

I didn't hear him try to blame to biker.

[@mattinman7143]

Cause it’s really that easy to just send a letter to the registered keeper and think that is job done. What if the registered keeper has already reported stolen, or reported plates stolen? What if on cloned plates? What if they did and the register keeper can prove the car was with them at X location at a given time? How you going to identify the driver then? Oh wait you cannot.

[@MorrisseysMonkey]

TVP "Could not identify the driver"? Even though the number plate is clearly shown?

[@ronnewsam6129]

False plates?

[@nuttycommuter3718]

And? Might not be registered properly. Might have been a mistake at the DVLA. 9/10 hit and run drivers are never caught. Number plates don’t do much, especially if you’re already criminally minded.

[@krashd]

A number plate only tells you who a car is registered to, not who might be driving it. Assuming the plate is even valid.

[@JanssonIsrael]

The video is so creative! Thank you!

[@adamcritchley4870]

😂😂😂😂 Tommy 10 men in his punto 😂😂😂

[@michaelh9042]

#4 when the Kuga driver put his arm out, the Picasso driver tried to assault him with her door.

[@AndrewWhite-fu7bn]

They were just a couple of knobs.

[@macsmith6216]

Clip #4. The Citroen has no MOT, what a surprise

[@paulncott4587]

How is that relevant when the idiot in the ford just tried to cause an accident?

[@cyberwomble7524]

5:00 Tha's a lorra Bob Mortimer impersonators - what are the odds, man?

[@Scotts23]

That punto in the video how on earth can the police say they couldn't identify the driver I've seen this a few times lately it's absolutely shocking they can say that basically I believe that the police just can't be arsed

[@joshuaaaa32]

If only there was some sort of registration number or something on the exterior of the car so they could be easily identified 🤔

[@ChuckieFinzter]

I can't think of a reason why the police can't identify the driver.

[@chriswhite9838]

@@ChuckieFinzter peace be upon him innit

[@ralphmillais5237]

Driver Tier 1 protected class.

[@darrents44]

Bet if he shouted bad words they would find them..

[@garyboyle695]

What is it going to take for the Police to get off their arses and actually arrest dangerous drivers?

[@deebeeaitch]

Depends on their protected characteristics.

[@Sortyourselfout-cu7en]

If that was a British citizen, they would be arrested without delay.

[@paul8161]

#6 , driver wants banning and fining mounting the pavement and trying to mount your rear end...the police want to actually do the job they are paid to do and protect the public from muppets like the wally behind and find him before he actually hurts someone or gets hurt himself ( hopefully).

[@dopiaza2006]

No chance, they're too busy scouring facebook for hurty words.

[@mattinman7143]

What do you think the Police should have done?

[@paul8161]

@@mattinman7143 their job.

[@mattinman7143]

@@paul8161 ok so what would you? Maybe send a NIP out to the register keeper? Maybe do a PNC check to see if it’s stolen, maybe do an intel check to see if there is any intel to see if it’s had plates stolen or on cloned plates. Oh it’s come back as stolen, what do we do now?

[@paul8161]

@@mattinman7143 so what's with all the questions? Are you trying to steer this somewhere?. To coin a phrase please step on the gas and enlighten us ?

[@bustestlucloc4630]

8:53 Well done that driver.

[@underwaterbubbles]

8.04 police couldn't identify the driver ?

[@goodyeoman4534]

One of the untouchables

[@scaz5000]

Meaning they couldn't be arsed look up the reg

[@jimwhippet3697]

Two tier Policing?

[@aleopardstail]

@@scaz5000 look it up then send out the NIP requiring the driver be identified for them as they would for say driving 1cm in a bus lane

[@GrahamAckrill]

@@scaz5000 It is not sufficient to just look up the reg number. So a section 172 notice is sent to the registered owner. Section 172 Notice (Road Traffic Act 1988) is also known as a Notice of Intended Prosecution (NIP). It is a letter from the police which contains the details of an offence and asks for the details of the driver at the time of the alleged offence. You must identify the driver and if you cannot6, then you must show due diligence that you have tried to do so. So just say I do not know is insufficient. You must respond to this within 28 days or it is the registered owner that is prosecuted.

[@Michelle_Schu-blacka]

It's all over the front page Everybody's got Road Rage...

[@darthkek1953]

It's all over the TV news This song's singer hates the Jews...

[@errnee]

#9 Skillz!

[@Scoupe400]

#9 “now observe your mirror, as next weeks lesson is drifting”

[@chloehew511]

#5 was so apologetic I actually felt so bad for him.

[@Craft-oh7uv]

The guy was more concerned with his motor bike 😂

[@reeceblythe8467]

He sounds high on adrenaline. Brain does not work properly when in situations like that.

[@carlstyth8368]

You do tend to, until the adrenal gland stops giving it big licks. Even crashing properly. As you're skating along (hopefully in leathers, boy n girls), you already have your mental calculator out. Plastics £000s, clutch lever, £00, nose fairing frame £00s, mirror £00, foot peg £00, new AGV or Shoei helmet etc, etc

[@stevemarshall8873]

It was brand new like!

[@Craft-oh7uv]

@@stevemarshall8873 when a baby is born it's brand new

[@machendave]

Clip 5.. HV55HVP Vehicle details could not be found?

[@craigrothwell6144]

Number 3 was an accident but the assault from the cyclist was not!

[@71calex]

#2 look at the positioning behind the van when the cam catches him up again. Deffo looking to get around the van first chance or more like half chance he gets.

[@carlstyth8368]

2:55 Understandable. But, he's just pissed all over his moral high ground. He'll probably get get sent down, too.

[@garyboyle695]

Maybe if crap drivers were prosecuted there would be no need for his reaction and a lot less deaths on our roads. But hey, let's not hold drivers to account.

[@paulncott4587]

​@@garyboyle695maybe if people were actually taught how to drive, and licences were only given to those who are capable we wouldn't have the problem. That would be a massive loss to the tax the govt have access to for p***ing up against the wall though, so that's never going to happen.

[@copaloadofthis]

@@garyboyle695 #registerallclyles ... when all cyclists are identifiable then we could track-down our fist-happy push-bike-plonker !!

[@talonlan]

@@copaloadofthis Boris bikes are all registered with unique regs displayed and yet not a single one has been used to bring a cyclist to account, wonder why that is?

[@secularspectator]

8:02 surprise surprise...

[@avonacolyte]

Is it them again, Yogi?

[@secularspectator]

@@avonacolyte don't feed the bears...

[@avonacolyte]

@@secularspectator If that were the man, I think I too would choose the bear

[@michaelgoode9555]

Thames Valley Police probably realised that it was one of their own.

[@stefanattrill8565]

3:30 Was that Ronald Pickering?

[@krashd]

Do you know who he is?! 🤣

[@whoops.28]

Yeah me!!!

[@shm5547]

8:00 excellent work from TVP road traffic unit again! 🙄 🍩🚔

[@paul8161]

Yep doughnuts driving cars eating doughnuts, thats canablisim. 😂

[@johntaylor5968]

At 4.50 moped guy, come on seriously - injuries ! ? I sort of doubt that .

[@hplovehandle]

" I've got the bairns in the car...", even more reason to drive carefully. What a peanurse.

[@bustestlucloc4630]

It was an accident! He couldn't have done more afterwards.

[@paulshuttleworth6261]

Maybe said sorry?

[@liamb8644]

@@paulshuttleworth6261TAG your fucking replies

[@SamDelaney-m3u]

He did pick the bike up😂😂😂😂🎉

[@CycolacFan]

@@paulshuttleworth6261sorry can be taken as admitting guilt.

[@ianlove1215]

#6: TVP can’t work out who is driving a car from the number plate? Curious!

[@dismalfist]

#6 - Six points and £800 fine for listening to that awful new Offspring song (it's bad.) Edit: and also an awareness course where you have to listen to Smash and Ignition and then Ixnay, and a judge MAKES you.

[@peter2385]

When the cyclist started to throw punches the driver had every right to leave.

[@LAMF24]

That's called hit and run on the driver's part.

[@notroll1279]

...yes, to keep out of further harm's way. However, he still has to report to the police lest it's considered a hit and run.

[@MattF340]

@@LAMF24 LOL - NO.

[@bearirving7002]

Not if they go direct to a police station and report it in person. (Not over the phone as some think.) If you are attacked it falls under "reasonable excuse" for not staying at the scene. There are stated cases for this. If they didn't go to police directly or in any case within 24 hrs then they would commit the offence of failing to report an RTC.

[@LAMF24]

@@MattF340 How isn't it?

[@paulharper4196]

Broccoli boy in his Punto is a real tough guy. One day he's gonna do that to the wrong one and end up iron out on the tarmac.

[@gavjlewis]

#8 @8:31 Odd one that. If you watch there isn't anybody Infront of the white Nissan all the way through the clip. So what was the reason to brake hard. Its like he did it on purpose because the corsa was driving too close.

[@paul8161]

Well, if it was a brake check, it didn't work out well for him, mate.😂😂

[@murpburp1]

Do you want to pull in the garage mate?

[@SamDelaney-m3u]

No, I need my broken back fixing 😂😂😂

[@911HRW]

#2, broken white line, perfectly acceptable to overtake, what does the Highway Code say about cars pulling out of junctions?

[@paulqueripel3493]

this. rule 167 DO NOT overtake where you might come into conflict with other road users. For example approaching or at a road junction on either side of the road

[@r1richie]

8:03 is that Admiral General Aladeen?

[@isthatreallytruetho]

3:07 that Tesco car park is a nightmare at the best of times without some chavs holding everything up. #5 that blokes on one, he doesn't even give the motorcyclist time to process what's just happened. #6 I would def put in a complaint about thames valley police not dealing with that. They most certainly can charge the keeper of the vehicle if they refuse to say who was driving.

[@paulncott4587]

I didn't see that. I saw a ford nearly cause an accident and the occupants of the Citroen trying to find out why the f*** it had happened. I suppose you are one of those careless drivers who keep the insurance prices going up.

[@Sortyourselfout-cu7en]

Yep, it's the usual suspects at 8:02. And Kier is happy to let them roam.

[@gary72carol61]

4:40 Arnison Centre, Pity Me, County Durham

[@user-vibami]

Highway code - when being overtaken, do not increase speed and slow down if necessary, to let the vehicle pass. They might be driving badly, but doesn't mean we have to endanger their life, give way.

[@fredlenz4743]

#4 Citroën driver needs reporting to police!

[@paulncott4587]

If that's your take on that clip, then I'm hoping you don't have a licence.

[@AndrewWhite-fu7bn]

#2 1:31. With this sort of driver it is often the thrill of a dodgy overtake, not the distance/time gained.

[@paulncott4587]

I can't be sure, but I think the vehicle recording was an HGV or similar. I'm not excusing the stupid move by the car driver, but who the hell wants to be stuck behind something like that when driving. They are slow to pick up road speed, need massive spaces to pull out of junctions (causing hold ups behind) and you can't see around them. I fully understand why someone would want to get it in to their rear view mirror as soon as was (safety) possible!

[@raymondpenn1066]

#4 Was that Ronnie Pickering?

[@elrekplaysgames4701]

#9 is that guy recording on vhs tape?

[@rossdenby2622]

5:30 - Will you shut up about pulling into the garage for 5 seconds, you've just knocked him off his new bike

[@paulfranklin8636]

#3 Doesn't matter wether he jumped the lights or not in throwing the punches he is immediately on the wrong side of things

[@Fyreflier]

I think they meant that, for once in their experience, a cyclist has actually recognised that red lights apply to them too!

[@MeFreeBee]

Now the cyclist is going to have to pay for any damage himself rather than claim off car's insurance or risk getting done for assault.

[@Chrisoakleyartist]

I think a salient fact is that the MX5 driver pulled out of the give way and drove right into the cyclist, which isn't connected to what happened at the red light. Should the cyclist have punched him? No. But that's profoundly dangerous driving.

[@bustestlucloc4630]

Whether...

[@adamwyatt-lowe2833]

whether*....

[@anthonypike3039]

I probably would have wanted a change of trousers if I was the pedestrian @7:00

[@Kieran.Robertson]

4:02 I’m with the blue car

[@popeye9048]

2:36 that limp wristed road nuisance should be charged with assault.

[@glennbeavis8478]

Karma, if he hadn't ran the red light, he wouldn't have connected with a car.

[@GrahamAckrill]

@@glennbeavis8478 The cyclist did no go t6hrough the red light but stopped in the ASL in front of the silver car, to the right which cleared the lane for those turning left.

[@Rich6Brew]

@@GrahamAckrill That still doesn't give him the right to throw two punches. He's guilty of assault at the very least.

[@louiem9382]

Driver needs banning from the roads pulling out in front of a vulnerable road user like that

[@paulncott4587]

Only after the car driver is charged for being completely incompetent and causing danger to life.

[@markgambrill]

#6 the other driver was very dangerous. Assuming their aggression was aimed at wanting pass you (there's no other evidence we can go on). Then why not pull over before it got to the massively dangerous actions?

[@Sortyourselfout-cu7en]

Yes, because rolling over for a genuine psychopath is going to make the situation better. Grow a spine.

[@markgambrill]

@@Sortyourselfout-cu7en grow a spine? You would rather stay in a dangerous situation? Suit yourself.

[@BrumKid]

At 4:44 a typical BMW driver cannot wait and is the cause of an accident. That fiat driver RE14ESO is totaly deranged and looking at him i can now see why and he should be banned from driving but at least his car is legal.

[@paulncott4587]

I don't remember that clip, but I'd rather drive on the roads with competent drivers in illegal cars, than halfwits in legal cars!

[@LAMF24]

2:45 No, that's a hit and run incident.

[@2008tourer]

2:50 punching the driver? Really? Childish behavior

[@nwcitroen2222]

No wonder the MX5 driver didn't hang around...

[@2008tourer]

@@nwcitroen2222 true, I would leg it as well

[@andrewdigby5114]

agree. but the driver was at fault.

[@godofcycling]

Cycle for a week and see long until you become "childish?"

[@2008tourer]

@@godofcycling I do cycle couple days a week mate, I know drivers are oblivious and generally useless but still. Beating someone up is shit behavior, there are institutions which prosecute drivers for you

[@carlstyth8368]

5:45 Dont start it up! Not till you know you haven’t holed ya crank cases. Probs not in this case. But still.

[@matthewgraham2498]

1:35 owner has just literally admitted he was breaking the speed limit, what a muppet.

[@MRCAGR1]

#8, illegal stop within the studs of a PELICAN crossing and why?

[@BDM276]

#3 I was thinking: why is this a clip? That cyclist did nothing wrong. This was probably sent by someone that just doesn't want to share the road. Then the rage happened.

[@SamDelaney-m3u]

Jumped a red light. Did you not see that?

[@GrahamAckrill]

@@SamDelaney-m3u He stopped in the ASL in front of the silver car and you can see his head over the top of it, so he never jumped the red light.

[@paulncott4587]

I didn't see any rage..I saw someone doing what they should be doing having their life and property treated like it was nothing. Car driver shouldn't be allowed to drive a shopping trolley.

[@SamDelaney-m3u]

@@paulncott4587 Paul, you need to watch the video again and see the rage. That will be when he punches the driver of the car several times.

[@paulncott4587]

​@@SamDelaney-m3uI saw very justified and controlled anger; that isn't rage. It p*sses me off the the n'th degree that people are constantly using terms, phrases and words that are neither appropriate or correct.

[@winksongs]

Are all these reported to the police? If not then the cammers become part of the problem..

[@paulncott4587]

The police do precisely nothing that isn't in keeping with the govts agenda. Open your mince pies!

[@godzillasdad]

2:03 police have totally lost control of cyclists but will pounce on motorists for any minor infraction.

[@InevitableMayo]

#6 got his reg, clearly see his face when he gets out of the car but the police "can't identify him" and just let it go after all that? Seriously everyone, stop paying your taxes if this is the level of policing they're paying for.

[@avonacolyte]

If you stop paying taxes they'll find the resources to deal with you!

[@GrahamAckrill]

The registered owner will get a Section 172 Notice (Road Traffic Act 1988) is also known as a Notice of Intended Prosecution (NIP). It is a letter from the police which contains the details of an offence and asks for the details of the driver at the time of the alleged offence. You then have 28 days to respond to it. If you cannot identify who was driving at that time you must show due diligence that you have tried to do so. So just saying I do not know is not good enough. A person who fails to comply with a requirement under s172 above will be guilty of an offence. This offence is punishable by 6 penalty points and a large fine of 150% of the person's weekly income. The punishment for this offence is more often than not more serious that the punishment for the triggering offence.

[@sarahbarton4977]

In the first video I thought they were going to take a baby/child out of the car

[@T-Bag13]

Protected characteristics. 🙄

[@ComeJesusChrist]

There seems to be a certain type of people who cannot behave and have no problems driving dangerously, intimidating others and using their vehicles as weapons. They could really just try and respect the law of this country a bit more.

[@nigelscott4325]

The last one, not excusing the taxi, but a flashing amber means don't start crossing for the pedestrian too

[@dVb9]

Agreed, but Highway Code rule 191 is there to protect unseen pedestrians, and the taxi driver was clearly in violation of it: "You MUST NOT overtake the moving vehicle nearest the crossing or the vehicle nearest the crossing which has stopped to give way to pedestrians."

[@davem9204]

The Clio should have got moving straight away and not tempted the pedestrian into the road. The central reservation with the control buttons is there so you don't have to cross the whole road in one go.

[@robnicholson5171]

#5 £2,000 🦈

[@tommysmith5479]

You might be in the right but don't make a mountain out of a molehill... you never know how the other driver will react.

[@paulncott4587]

Doesn't matter how the idiot reacts. The lesson your teaching obviously isn't being taught effectively enough if you leave room for them to "react".

[@robnicholson5171]

I hope that driver reported the cyclist for assault!

[@bestintheworld568]

6:08 Imagine complaining about someone else's crap driving while recording your own crap driving. Both man-children.

[@bobtudbury8505]

1:26 was his overtaking illegal other than speeding like you

[@TheKeirsunishi]

Make sense please

[@tyc0746]

@@TheKeirsunishi Which bit do you think is 'illegal' - hint, it's not the overtake - so if it's the speeding then both the car & lorry drivers are doing the same 'illegal speeding'. The Vauxhall should not enter the main road unless it's clear and safe to do so - which it obviously wasn't as the Volvo was legally overtaking the lorry (dashed lines on this side of the solid line). BTW, the lorry driver says he's doing "44 or 45 in a 40" when the markings on the road (at 1m30s) & the repeaters (at 1m40s) say it's a 50mph limit, so the car was probably not even speeding.

[@bobtudbury8505]

@@TheKeirsunishi what??? one car overtaking , WAS IT ILLEGAL????

[@paul8161]

​@tyc0746 it wouldn't matter if the car overtaking is legal or not legal if he had crashed into the car coming out he would have been at fault anyway. (.and he could have crashed quite easily). Rubbish impatient overtake. D - needs to learn how to drive .

[@bobtudbury8505]

@@paul8161 remember, the car coming out is on a give way....this means both ways too.

[@carlstyth8368]

3:12 All wonderfully silly. Gotta love modern life. The Kuga had nowhere to turn to. So why turn across the Citreon. You certainly wouldnt have done the same on the road. Then we all get out n' shout loads of stuff. Coz we're all warriors. We dont get any better, do we. I count myself in that too.

[@oddjobtriumph1635]

@2:38..Brilliant

[@crazyeye9413]

4:45I can only say that the British are really stubborn.

[@joshpring3941]

#6 no point break checking him and escalating it further, if it’s that much of a problem pull over let him pass, saves you getting stressed out and making it worse to massage your ego of I’m in the right. There’s enough people with a bigger ego that’ll go that bit further and what does it achieve? Nothing. Just let it go and carry on about your day

[@IanAnthonyMartin]

How does one "break check"? 😄

[@iancrozier8068]

#6 the TVP "couldn't " read "wouldn't" find this fine upstanding hero of Itsa sham. they're a protected species don't ya know

[@neilharrison7555]

Mazda MX5 v cyclist !!!! Car was emerging onto the road, so, should have a) seen the cyclist and b) NOT knocked him off his bike ! HOWEVER, NOTHING excuses the cyclist for punching the Mazdadriver twice. Hence he departed the scene. He REALLY should have called the police straight away and explained WHY he left the scene of an RTC - he was being attacked. Irrespective of the RTC, the cyclist should have been nicked and charged with assault. #6.

[@davem9204]

I suppose the police might just say these two just cancelled each other out. Terrible driving by the MX5 driver, and got an instant punishment as a result. I do wonder whether the MX5 driver was so focused on the car behind the cyclist turning left the cyclist just became 'invisible' to them. A similar thing happened to me recently where I was behind a cyclist (going very slowly) and I was about to turn left into a side road. A car waiting to pull out of the side road saw me indicating left and just pullud out and hit the cyclist. Both me and the cyclist gave the driver a good telling off, but she just looked completely baffled.

[@Tommi-C]

They could not identify him, How much people look like a knock off Borat.

[@Euphoricsound]

#3 see you in court for that assault, cyclist.

[@jonathongellibrand3632]

absolutely!

[@paulncott4587]

​@@jonathongellibrand3632goit. The incompetence of that driver needed highlighting. The govt, police, or courts won't do it, so how do you suggest it is done? A quiet word? Wearing a sandwich board saying "please don't be an incompetent fool"???

[@rk-7170]

how ya gonna sue if you don't even know who is he is haha

[@cody2470]

#5 gotta say you’re a good actor! Beyond me how you’ve blagged your way to £2000, absolute jobsworth.

[@johnwhite2143]

That cyclist throwing punches was wrong, he's lucky the guy he punched never drove over his bike, alot of people would have

[@MorrisseysMonkey]

#4 How petty, get a life.

[@johnhughes2653]

#5 - Yes, there's something wrong with it. There's two wheels missing!

[@bustestlucloc4630]

😅

[@ianwalkden3024]

Karma , jumping red light then knocked off. He wouldn't have been there is he had waited for the green light

[@chriswhite9838]

He didn't jump the red light.

[@darrenbruce7927]

so the cyclist totally gives himself the bad standing by getting physical. no matter who is in the wrong you start swinging and you either come up against some nutter who will knife you or you get done for GBH

[@Beefkilz]

Remember everyone. Don't say anything about number 6 or you will end up in prison and yes they WILL identify YOU easily.

[@aleopardstail]

#6, after a short investigation they decided he was the tier above you and it was all far too much paperwork anyway

[@JamesHartnell]

Yup - protected species.

[@goodyeoman4534]

I'd be very surprised if he got punished at all. Had a lorry tailgate me all through Sheffield S5 and police weren't interested.

[@aleopardstail]

@@goodyeoman4534 you need to remove the thought the police are there to protect the individual, they are not and never really have been, you being tailgated in no way threatens the establishment so the police don't have time for it unless they hap[pen to witness it and happen to have the time

[@johnhughes2653]

You would be angry if you had to drive a Fiat.

[@aleopardstail]

@@johnhughes2653 there is that, however I would likely be a lot better at rectifying electrical faults and preventing corrosion

[@eleycki]

#3: you are more interested in calling out the cyclist than you are the motorist that ran him down and could have killed someone? Got it.

[@Noony79]

Damn right

[@neilharrison7555]

#6. Surely, TVP could identify the driver through his reg plate AND your dashcam footage was clear. That Fiat driver was deserving of going into a court to "defend" his actions. Scum !

[@shm5547]

2:37 hit and run

[@mopman94]

It wasn’t given the cyclist assaulted the driver they were in their right and correct to leave the situation

[@Maedroth]

@@mopman94 If you hit someone, expect to get hit back.

[@v52gc]

@@Maedroththere’s a clear line between accidental/incompetence and intentional.

[@sendittothenewts]

@@mopman94 The driver still needs to report to the police station within 24 hours, but yes, leaving the scene does seem perfectly reasonable under the circumstances.

[@jamesbradley4209]

#7 couldn’t or wouldn’t identify driver for his privilege

[@djwayloop3224]

No 2 your in a 50 not 40 get of the coms.😂😂

[@godofcycling]

I understand the cyclists rage. Look straight at you then pull out anyway? Clearly he has lost faith in the police to do anything. Sadly it will be himself who gets the fine, ASBO and criminal record.

[@Odysseuss.]

I don't think it was nearly as bad as portrayed and punchy made a meal of the first "collision" then laid in there. Probably premeditated too.