I think the biggest fool in scenario one is the one who thinks Horn of the Phantom Beast can make a difference in 2024.
@thelenneh4097 ай бұрын
hey +8 draw 1 is what fiends crave
@nharviala7 ай бұрын
@@thelenneh409 I'm not sure if you're referring to the player or the creature type... but being a Magical Musket player, yes, bigger stats and hand draw WOULD be highly valued.
@6210classick7 ай бұрын
Horn is used as an example for Normal Trap cards that equip themselves to a card on the field
@gubigubigubigubi7 ай бұрын
Konami hiring lawyers to write their card text again.
@chitahitsu47437 ай бұрын
This is truly a card that didnt need to exist
@saitougin72107 ай бұрын
It's a bit unfortunate, that we don't have an official TCG-ruling concerning the rollback-epudemicVirus interaction. You'd think, since this is pretty much the very first thing people wanted to copy, after rollback has been announced, there'd be an official statement about that. But no. This is very suboptimal.
@skuamato78867 ай бұрын
Let's be real here: did you actually expect a statement? That would be a world's first xD
@kennethhernandez67077 ай бұрын
TCg Konami doesn’t care bro
@saitougin72107 ай бұрын
@@skuamato7886 I never claimed that an official statement was realistic or to be expected due to actions of the past. But imagine this: seen purely from a sauber view of the game as such, I think it would have made sense to just make the ruling clear beforehand, if this is THE most anticipated card of the set and if the community has already set their aim to use it to copy the effect of one (or two) very specific target(s).
@RAMPettersen7 ай бұрын
The judge program lead only exists to post new products and discredit the OCG database. We are a miracle away from getting a responsible answer to the modern ruling problems and conflicts
@dylanserra65017 ай бұрын
Can you imagine someone hits you with d barrier, then transaction rollback on d barrier, and then finally when you think they're done they hit you with spellbound? Jesust.
@tyangchizzle7 ай бұрын
Glad I watched this vid. Learned new things. Knowledge is power, y'all! Great content, TomBox! 💪🔥
@tshiablauj-projectdreamerd9087 ай бұрын
Be aware though as a wiseman once said "can't win against a large group of stupid ppl"
@ManuelRiccobono7 ай бұрын
Basically transation rollback let you activate a card from the gy. You behave like if the card was activated (trigger conditions, targets, effect) but you ignore any costs
@Ang3lsOfClairty7 ай бұрын
agreed. rollback states ";this effect becomes that normal traps effect when THAT card is activated." if it said when that EFFECT is activated, it would not work.
@kaimobley53247 ай бұрын
So let me get this right on the Do's and Don't of Transaction Rollback Doesn't: • Pay a Cost (if there is one) • Copy an effect that says "This Cards Activation" in its text while it's in your Grave (changes with TCG vs OCG Rules). Example - Eradication Epidemic Virus (in TCG) • Work on Traps that Equip (including material I'm guessing) or changes the Trap itself into a Non-Normal Trap Does: • Bypasses the Hard Once Per Turn and Once Per Duel limit • Copy a card's effect that says "This Cards Activation" in text *IF* the card is *currently* being activated in Grave or is sent to the Grave before Resolution by your opponent and Rollback is already set on your side of the field and can be activated at that time • Still Need to meet the Requirements/Conditions of the effect like having a certain Type, Element or Name that's on/in the Deck/Hand/Field/Grave/Banish • You can Activate Transaction Rollback on an already active/activated Trap (assuming this works like Chain Blocking also). Example - you can get 2 Dimensional Barrier Effects for the Price of 1 if it and Rollback resolves Judges Personal Rulings may very on Person and Events but they should be consistent with TCG and OCG rules across the board.
@mavisb.vermilion58817 ай бұрын
You can copy effects that attach themselves as materials, but still cannot copy effects that summon or equip themselves.
@polodoskyz7 ай бұрын
this card really, shouldn't exist, I feel it will be like halqifibrax banning inocent cards all over again
@athenaproductions35697 ай бұрын
Just wait till PHNI and Labrynth will be getting cooked. Fire king matchup too rough
@polodoskyz7 ай бұрын
I mean yeah, but every deck with access to beatrice or someway to throw 2 traps in the grave will be broken now, since there's no way to stop the trap from going off, there's already a combo for unchained to do that instead of Caesar, I really miss red reboot
@polodoskyz7 ай бұрын
even if beatrice is banned a deck like tear that throws lot's of cards in the grave could become that as well, and a lot of other possibilities we aren't seeing yet, I really think if this card doesn't get banned a lot of other "innocent" cards will have to
@DonMarzzoni7 ай бұрын
Dude halq needed to go. Stfu
@6210classick7 ай бұрын
@@polodoskyzremoving the targeted trap from your opponent GY will make Transaction Rollback resolve without effect
@dominator_md62957 ай бұрын
We need a called by for spells and traps now due to this card
@MetaSheepSlaughterHouse7 ай бұрын
It's called DD Crow. If Rollback loses its target, it resolves without effect.
@DangerWildman4207 ай бұрын
D.D. crow exist
@6210classick7 ай бұрын
Foolish Return
@smoothpickle7 ай бұрын
literally wouldnt matter a called by for spell/traps would have to target and banish on resolution, which means you can just chain transaction rollback to that or if they shotgun it before you can "call by" it, it will be too late
@6210classick7 ай бұрын
@@smoothpickle what do ya mean by too late?
@gsephoenixreign16657 ай бұрын
One of my best mates is a labyrinth player and it’s good that he can’t abuse this card for EEV
@xCorvus7x7 ай бұрын
But apparently you definitely can.
@xCorvus7x7 ай бұрын
(responding to 5:14, mostly) It seems Transaction Rollback is supposed to be some kind of shadow clone of the trap it targets, so it circumvents the expense (the cost), as it creates another instance of that effect for basically free, but still has to respect activation requirements. It might look silly to explain this with the flavour of cards (how cards were reasoned to work in the earlier parts of the YGO manga), but for something like Harpie's Feather Storm you could imagine that the trap effect is a strong wind that the Wind Winged-Beast you control applies to the field.
@monkfishy63487 ай бұрын
What's weird is that sometimes copy effects don't need to respect activation conditions, or activation procedures and sometimes copy effects don't ignore costs. For example, Phantom of Chaos has copied the effects of Hope Harbinger, it cannot activate the second effect to detatch a card as cost (cost is not ignored). Fusion Duplication can copy the effect of Ultimate Fusion outside of a Main Phase (activation condition ignored). Sometimes other conditions are ignored or not ignored too, depending on a multitude of different things. Rollback 2nd effect in GY copying Heavy Duster Storm > you can proceed to Battle that turn. Rollback 1st effect on field copying Heavy Duster Storm > you cannot proceed to Battle that turn.
@maka10777 ай бұрын
I did not understand why we need to meet the activation requitements of the targeted card. Of course it would be broken otherwise, but Traptrix Rafflesia specifies "a card that meets its activation conditions" while this one does not. So, why isn't there a difference?
@Aznfanta7 ай бұрын
It's like dinomorphia kentegrina, when copying effects, it ignores the cost, but must meet the conditions that it copies because the card cannot work out of that window. Same as fusion duplication. Must meet conditions before copying
@RoyaltonDrummer9227 ай бұрын
Because it would be game breaking if you could just ignore all of the activation requirements
@Majoraspersona7 ай бұрын
So if got this right, Transaction Rollback doesn't have to pay cost (due to copying effects), but it DOES have to match the activation conditions, such as targeting and the field state. Does that about sum it up?
@David-hw9si7 ай бұрын
yes, until more exceptions are found (YGO lawbook rule)
@xatuyou80457 ай бұрын
Yes, it's actually the same as trap of darkness, which is worded to explain how it works
@mariocruz5917 ай бұрын
Does it somehow same as d hero diamond dude?
@raydhen88407 ай бұрын
It is exactly like Diamond Dude Turbo way back, but for trap. Or for slighty more modern case, Verte copying Superpoly, you can bypass the discard cost, but at the same time, it doesn't have "spell speed 4" condition because those were the property of Superpoly itself, not Verte.
@monkfishy63487 ай бұрын
Here's a tricky ruling I was forced to make the other day. Can "Destiny Hero Diamond Dude" activate the effect of "Numeron Creation" sent to the GY by its effect. I ruled that it can't, because the Spell cannot apply "attach this Spell from the field" (mandatory) to the Xyz monster it summons. Another judge brought up the fact that "Phantom of Chaos" copying the effects of Number 38 Hope Harbinger, can activate its Spell negate effect, even though it cannot attach the Spell to itself (mandatory). I countered with the fact that Transaction Rollback's 2nd effect cannot copy the effect of Xyz Reborn which special summons and attaches itself because Transaction Rollback cannot be attached from banishment.
@maurizioamoruso1426 ай бұрын
So, if a declare end of battle phase, i have transaction and evenly in gy, with no card on field, i can declare transaction target Evenly and banish face down all of their field?
@maurizioamoruso1426 ай бұрын
Hope i have a response soon, thanks a lot to the guys that will eventually read this comment
@jarzz36013 ай бұрын
yes
@ElathinFun7 ай бұрын
Can you make a list with all traps with strong effect but high costs for transaction rollback?
@megaxaphan7 ай бұрын
Thank you for cleaning the EEV copy ruling, this will help me a lot as a new judge for my community.
@taewiz8637 ай бұрын
DD crow is about to be a GOD CARD next format lol. Remove the targeted trap and it resolves without effect.
@ZarkionUltimate7 ай бұрын
Considering how many powerful upcoming gy strategies there are you're honestly not wrong
@jasonl5177 ай бұрын
Just want to point something out in regard to mandatory effects that target. It does not cause a card to necessarily resolve without effect if there’s no target. An example of would be the mandatory of Majestic Star Dragon to return to Extra Deck even if there’s no Stardust Dragon in the GY.
@KSprites7 ай бұрын
I literally asked this question last night regarding branded banishment, thanks for the video! So if I'm interpreting correctly, the targeting window would still be the same as usual?
@6210classick7 ай бұрын
Yes, it's the same
@DemetrisBarnes7 ай бұрын
I think what is the most relevant question: Does Transaction Rollback get the lingering effect of EEV? I would think not since it wasn’t the actual card itself. Similar to Verte!
@11wildy637 ай бұрын
How would this card's rulings interact with Trap Trick and Trap Track? In regards to how many traps may be used afterwards, or if it is even legal.
@6210classick7 ай бұрын
Ya will be able to to activate other Trap cards during the turn that ya Rollback either Track or Trick
@monkfishy63487 ай бұрын
This is wrong when targeting it at activation of Transaction Rollback. You cannot proceed to Battle Phase after activating Transaction Rollback on the field by targeting Heavy Duster Storm because you are now under the restriction of activating the card "Heavy Duster Storm". "After activating/resolving this card" conditions are still applied when you activate Transaction Rollback by copying them.@@6210classick
@brandonmiotke6 ай бұрын
I was wondering this too since this came up on duelingbook when I was playing rated. Is that trap still able to be activated? Is the sentence after the first clause part of the activation effect?
@lefthandedscout99237 ай бұрын
For that first example, you say that you select targets at the same time as you target the card to copy in the GY with Transaction Rollback. If that's the case and you used, say, Raigeki Break as in the video, to target a card that has an effect that can activate when targeted, such as Maiden with Eyes of Blue or Blue-Eyes Shining Dragon, would those cards be able to be activated in response? As an extension to that question, what about Jizukiru the Star Destroying Kaiju? That effect responds to an effect that targets 1 card and no other cards. Can you use that in response to a Transaction Rollback targeting Raigeki Break then "targeting" Jizukiru?
@asdfasgdfgsd1077 ай бұрын
I really like this since I still don't understand how targeting as a cost is still allowed when it only copies the activated effect.
@MaexxLoL7 ай бұрын
@@asdfasgdfgsd107because targeting isn't cost. It's more like an activation requirement
@RoyaltonDrummer9227 ай бұрын
@@asdfasgdfgsd107targeting isn’t a cost
@RoyaltonDrummer9227 ай бұрын
Why wouldn’t you be able to do that? The Kaiju example is more interesting but the Kaiju would be responding to the Transaction Rollback which is targeting exactly one card itself. Transaction Rollback is a disaster of card design though and I hope it gets banned somewhat quickly
@asdfasgdfgsd1077 ай бұрын
@@RoyaltonDrummer922 I always thought targeting was a cost. Book of mooning the target still causes it to fizzle correct or is targeting never a cost
@SpainLord7 ай бұрын
i remember reading that copying eev wouldnt destroy any cards, it would just let you see the opponents cards because you didnt tribute and call a card type
@DonMarzzoni7 ай бұрын
Not true it will destroy and look. It just won't linger for three turns
@MSTTV7 ай бұрын
Hmm, If I ruled it at an event,... I would just copy what the Local Continent YCS does and keep it consistent. What I can do, is email Konami directly and get an answer TCG R&D, we've had difference in rulings via Card Text in TCG and OCG from Amorphactor Pain, Altergeist Manifestation, we had to play by the card text I:P vs Rullkallos, or TCG VS OCG on if a monster needs to be in the correct place to activate (call of the haunted vs Stratos). If i don't have an answer from anywhere, I would probably not allow the GY effect to legally activate it until a new text change occurred. As judges we cannot break policy or established precedent of a function rule just to make a wonky effect copy for the sake of convenience.
@turtle-bot30497 ай бұрын
@@MSTTVan official update to this would be good. I too thought it would copy the initial destruction effect, but not be able to copy the lingering effect. There really needs to be an official rules page dropped with cards like these, they cause so many rulings nightmares.
@monkfishy63487 ай бұрын
This is a dumb way to rule it. If you cannot apply the entire effect, you cannot apply any of the effect. "3 turns after this card's activation" IS PART OF THE EFFECT. Transaction Rollback's 2nd effect cannot target Xyz Reborn because it cannot attach itself from banishment. You can't just choose to apply only the part of the effect which special summons an Xyz monster. That's an illegal activation, no different to trying to target EEV with TR in GY. Anybody parroting that EEV only applies for 1 turn when TR's 2nd effect copies it is completely ignorant. @@DonMarzzoni
@DonMarzzoni7 ай бұрын
@monkfishy6348 if you don't like it complain to Konami 🤷
@danilo.pereira7 ай бұрын
this game is ridiculous
@Trekkie467 ай бұрын
I don't want to deal with this headache. Can Konami please stop printing copy effects? Exhibit A here feels like a dictionary.
@michaellin26166 ай бұрын
i got a question about Transaction Rollback, if i activate Transaction Rollback second effect: "You can banish this card from your GY and pay half your LP, then target 1 Normal Trap in your GY, except "Transaction Rollback"; this effect becomes that card's activation effect." while i have Lovely Labrynth of the Silver Castle on the field, does Transaction Rollback second effect treat as activation of Normal Trap Cards? if so, does it mean that my opponent cannot cannot activate monster effects in response to Transaction Rollback second effect?
@MSTTV6 ай бұрын
It is not an activation of a normal trap CARD, no. it’s an activation of a trap effect
@four-en-tee7 ай бұрын
Okay, so let me get this straight: It doesnt copy maintenance costs, but it does copy activation conditions since they're what allow the activated effect to fire off? Even though the card just says "this effect becomes that card's activation effect." Like, the way thats written, it sounds like you just get to skip everything. This card needs an errata just for clarification, or it needs to be banned because its admittedly unhealthy.
@DoBa19947 ай бұрын
It's activation cost, not maintenance costs.The way it's written it's quite clear you'd need the activation requirements; that's why it's specifically worded like that and not just copies the effect.
@esrohm64607 ай бұрын
imagine having a consistent rules book, couldn't be yugioh. i wonder if now that a good card can copy trap cards we will get some "rules additions" to make it consistent between ocg and tcg as otherwise that would be super messy for worlds
@thelenneh4097 ай бұрын
Would love a clarification on the PSCT or your interpretation on the card "Non Aggression Area". There is some interesting wording that could be interpreted subjectively
@6210classick7 ай бұрын
It's pretty straightforward, there's nothing much to it. 1) can only be activated during your Standby Phase 2) The cost is discarding 1 card As long as it is your Stand Phase, ya can use Transaction Rollback to copy Non Aggression Area
@LevixneАй бұрын
@@6210classickI dont see why its that straight forward. There are other cards with conditions in the cost, so theres a posibility it does not need to be during the standby here
@scott8985867 ай бұрын
Transaction Rollback should be able to copy the effect of EEV, but it should not last for 3 turns if it is copying it from the graveyard. That is the only thing the "this card's activation" applies to. The duration of how long EEV or similar cards last.
@fhyrajackal7 ай бұрын
This is how I'm seeing it ruled too
@EltonLeonidas7 ай бұрын
First i've seen Yacine's video about the card, and he said the same thing. Is there any database entry about this? This is kinda relevant.
@scott8985867 ай бұрын
@@EltonLeonidas There is not at this time, which is why everyone is using the standard "ask your HJ" statement. This really comes down to a localization issue imo where additional or incorrect text is added to a card. Either we will see an errata or likely HJs will just follow the OCG ruling, or make their own for that event. We don't have official TCG rulings anymore and we really have nothing else to rely on aside from the OCG and database.
@pazim967 ай бұрын
You cannot just copy some parts of the same effect and ignore those that don’t fit the narrative. It’s all one effect and if you cannot apply it, you can’t copy it.
@scott8985867 ай бұрын
@@pazim96 That is not true at all as we are already ignoring cost, but not activation requirements. The only thing that matters is that activation requirements for the card being copied are met. Until Konami gives us a definitive answer, and good luck with that one here, I can likely see this being the main way it is ruled or it will be ruled to follow in line with the OCG. Rarely would I see it ruled as being an illegal play for EEV to be targeted. There is no other precedent set for this on either side of the game. What I am seeing discussed by other judges is exactly what I am saying in my original post at this time. It would apply the effect it has that can be copied, which is to check the hand and field and destroy the selected type, but the lingering effect would not be applied until the card was errata'ed to match the OCG version of the card. The card being referenced in the argument against it, Extinction on Scheduled, does not have any effect to copy aside from the delayed effect. This card also does match its OCG counterparts text which is why it is ruled that it cannot be targeted in the graveyard by Transaction Rollback in the OCG and everyone here is agreeing with that.
@Emac0007 ай бұрын
Any trap that has a cost use transaction rollback and you get the effect with no cost
@Lexgnzlz7 ай бұрын
Well, you still have to pay half your LP, though that isn't usually a heavy cost late-game.
@Wolfirhart7 ай бұрын
That's so messed up. TRB copies basically everything the trap says, except the literal cost. This feels so wrong. You still have to meet all requirements and conditions, which are basically "costs" themselves, and even targeting is basically a "cost", but the actual cost is skipped, like what?
@dereklebeau7 ай бұрын
With "Break the Destiny" could you use transaction rollback to copy the banishing effect that adds a spell/trap? Or what about the eldlich traps banish effects?
@flaviovargas61487 ай бұрын
No, transaction rollback copies the effects that activate when the card is on field, not the graveyard effects. So whatever would happen if you activated the card on the field, that’s what you can copy with rollback.
@yubelsapprentice14737 ай бұрын
Well labyrinth barrage says the cards resolution where as eradicator says cards activation. It's weird because I would assume just like you are only activating an effect and not a card, the same would apply to resolving effect as card. I thought the eev was illegal because looking at punctuation it looked like declaring was part of the cost which is bizarre imo.
@Garaito92Official7 ай бұрын
thanks tombox. a new knowledge for me as a judge
@kennethM5 ай бұрын
apparently ash blossom cannot respond to transaction rollback targeting big welcome labrynth.
@uncleiroh61277 ай бұрын
My locals let us use it but said until they know for sure we can’t use it to copy any of the virus cards
@mariorovira36397 ай бұрын
According to yacine you are allowed to copy eev with rollback however you will only destroy the declared card spell/trap during that turn only and not for the next 3 turns
@11wildy637 ай бұрын
But that's the last pereson you should listen to
@MEGAFUNTIME1007 ай бұрын
Never listen to Yacine, I even played locals with him at card brawlers and met him in other regionals/ of the Montréal area, he is well known for being a pain to deal with him...
@alex978827 ай бұрын
Hes right tho As usual tho hj gotta decide what he wants to rule it as
@mrrogers35817 ай бұрын
That dude says a deck is dead 1 week, then the next week says it's the next broken deck
@RoyaltonDrummer9227 ай бұрын
As if he knows more than Tombox
@smokeey42023 ай бұрын
MST.tv can you do a explaination on how transaction rollback works with rise to full heights does the trap target in the gy need to stay there for the effect to resolve
@MansMan420695 ай бұрын
so OCG Transaction Rollback is literally the better version?
@ManuelRiccobono7 ай бұрын
They should change the mayakashi card text to “target 1 mayakashi synchro/link, tribute it;” this way decks cannot abuse it, but mayakashi decks can still play it as before
@holierthanu17 ай бұрын
mo
@haruhisuzumiya66505 ай бұрын
Transaction rollback doesn't copy the cost, only the effect "neither player can special summon from hand, deck this turn"
@fear7788one7 ай бұрын
Hi does anyone know this if dd crow is chained to transaction rollbacks target trap does it still copy the eff if the target is banished ?
@Jaganphotos7 ай бұрын
It would not copy the trap
@fear7788one7 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@uncreativeusername-sl9qf7 ай бұрын
So what I’m hearing is main or side deck crow@@Jaganphotos
@Jaganphotos7 ай бұрын
@@uncreativeusername-sl9qf personally I’ve been siding crow for awhile instead of using Bystials. I prefer the flexibility
@yungcobalt7 ай бұрын
cant i use this card with Needlebug Nest in Tearlaments? seems broken
@brentmayfield5017 ай бұрын
Love the dividers!!!
@jaycapcom2Ай бұрын
Thank you for this video I appreciate it
@archmagemc35617 ай бұрын
There is a card that targets and destroys on resolution, and thats Magicial Dimension. It was a pretty decent tech card back in the day.
@monkfishy63487 ай бұрын
This is false. It tributes on resolution, it targets for activation procedure like every other targeting card in the game.
@josephschultz24776 ай бұрын
What about transaction vs Black goat? Is it like imperm where you targert (call name) on activation or is it an illegal target?
@xCorvus7x7 ай бұрын
If you try to copy a Trap that equips itself with TR's second effect, isn't this technically impossible since TR isn't considered the same card the effect of which you activated, after it has been banished for cost? The card that the effect would require to be equipped to a monster has changed location here.
@mavisb.vermilion58817 ай бұрын
Even with Transaction Rollback 1st effect, it's not possible despite the card is still in valid position. Bacically, you cannot copy cards that summon or equip themselves, but you can copy cards that attach themselves as materials.
@xCorvus7x7 ай бұрын
@@mavisb.vermilion5881 Yeah, because they ruled it that way but I'm not sure why they did that. It's even more bewildering, if you can copy effects to attach the card as material. How is that fundamentally different from equipping it or even summoning it? In all three cases the trap card does something that is unusual for traps.
@kennymoralesguerrero40257 ай бұрын
Honestly halq was insanelly broken duel to the change of the master rule. I think beatrice will be banned because of that trap Since this opens a new spam of scythe lock
@colorfulmoth7 ай бұрын
Scythe is banned.
@kennymoralesguerrero40257 ай бұрын
@@colorfulmoth sorry, what I mean is that this might open a pseudo scythe lock but activating that mayakashi card instead
@LJK7377 ай бұрын
Could you transaction rollback a witch’s strike? Do you have to do it in chain, can it be activated as chain 1 after a negate has happened on the board?
@royaldayz187 ай бұрын
I understand that Transaction Rollback does not ignore conditions, only costs...but WHY does it do that? If Destiny HERO Diamond Dude can copy Ojama Delta Hurricane, then why can't Transaction Rollback copy Huge Revolution? It only says to activate the effect. It's not like Bait Doll or Junk Collector who either state "if the activation timing is correct" or "Requirements must be correct but costs are not paid".
@chewdoom84157 ай бұрын
Diamond dude ignores the activation conditions too. It may be because it says that you can activate the effect as opposed to it saying that its effect becomes the cards effect.
@garylocc81287 ай бұрын
If you have to meet activation conditions, how does the Mayakashi card/EEV work? You couldn’t activate either if you didn’t have a tribute.
@nomass76007 ай бұрын
They are costs and since you are ignoring cost’s and just applying the effect of the card.
@6210classick7 ай бұрын
Since the Mayakashi card has no activation requirement and only a cost which is to tribute a Mayakashi Link or Synchro, ya will simply ignore the cost and apply the rest of the card
@HakuaZR7 ай бұрын
The confusion here is activation condition vs activation cost. What it means by meeting conditions is that it's a proper timing to activate it. Like you cannot just Transaction Rollback an Evenly Matched at any time, it still must meet the activation requirement: end of the battle phase + your opponent controls more cards than you.
@kingbic2092 ай бұрын
Does anyone know of a card similar to this that works for spell cards? Except serial spell?
@user-hq7xq5ns7f7 ай бұрын
Thanks for ruling video, helps a lot
@herculesmwp79837 ай бұрын
My head hurts…
@urielguerra99997 ай бұрын
Finally a clear explanation
@TheAndiXFail7 ай бұрын
Childrens' card game btw
@tthrash6507 ай бұрын
😂
@Xenonfuji7 ай бұрын
Anime card btw
@UTgohan7 ай бұрын
Diamond dude bypasses cost and restrictions/conditions,doesn’t transaction roll back not do the same thing?
@mavisb.vermilion58817 ай бұрын
Diamond Dude activates the effect of the other card; Transaction Rollback doesn't, it only copies the effect. It is more clear if you look at the ocg text. On Diamond Dude card, it says "you CAN ACTIVATE the activation effect of that normal spellcard in the GY". As opposed to Transaction Rollback, it simply says "this effect becomes the same as that normal trap card's activation effect", it does NOT state that you can activate the activation effect. The activation of Transaction Rollback is you copying the effect of other trap card.
@showtvbest7 ай бұрын
So what is the ruling on the first card you didn’t answer for the equip thing
@kratosaurionbasti7 ай бұрын
What happens when you use transaction on field to copy an opponents imperm? I know you need to target but do you copy the negate of the coloum cause transaction was set or only the negate.
@BloodsCaress7 ай бұрын
I'm fairly certain it wouldn't shut the zones down. Imperm states if this card was set which it was not.
@michaelmorales16027 ай бұрын
Yeah you'd shut down the zones
@michaelmorales16027 ай бұрын
@@BloodsCaress Rollback was set though, and is on field at resolution. It copies that effect as well.
@monkfishy63487 ай бұрын
It applies the entire effect if Transaction Rollback copies Imperm while it is set.
@Calamitygreed7 ай бұрын
This one of the most horribly design card in a while
@niclassievers32477 ай бұрын
If i already used the 2nd effect of lovely but then activate rollback in a new chain (same turn) to copy big welcome, can lovely use its 2nd effect again? Or simple: Can i use the 2nd effect of her twice per turn with rollback?
@snaker_5746 ай бұрын
No, because it's one of the following effects that can be use once per turn. Once you used her second effect on the same turn, you can't use her effect again
@garciansmith14607 ай бұрын
What if you transaction rollback, Target raigeki break, and then target FOR raigeki break’s copied effect and then the targeted Raigeki Break gets DD Crow’d??
@mrrogers35817 ай бұрын
Then transaction rollback no longer has a proper target and it resolves without effect
@friendlyduelist24037 ай бұрын
How about Non Agression Area? Is it possible to use it with Transaction Rollback without having to discard a card? Also, would you only be able to do this during your standby phase, as that is a criterion for Non Aggression Area?
@thereconracoon37157 ай бұрын
It's still bad. You'd make it so rollback and non aggression area are in the gy. You pass. Your opponent plays their turn. If you survive and they pass then you can activate the rollback to copy for it to take effect the next turn. Takes too damn long
@vitortakara70906 ай бұрын
yes you can use it with non agression area, if both are on your grave next turn you can activate trasaction roll back from grave to copy it's effect, transaction roll back can skip costs like discarding cards or sacrificing monsters but the activation restricion still apply such as must control n numbers or during the combat step when a monster declares an atack or during the end step need to be met in order to activate
@Xigbar03317 ай бұрын
I feel like you shouldnt be able to, but if you pay half to act. Trans roll, can you pay half again for dinomorphia domain/frenzy?
@mavisb.vermilion58817 ай бұрын
The cost is paid when you activate a card/effect, not when it resolves. So when you declare you will use Transaction Rollback, half of your LP is already deducted. If you decide to chain it, yes you can pay with half of the the remaning half of your LP. So if you pay 4k for Transaction Rollback, you will only need to pay 2k for the next card.
@Mugenman887 ай бұрын
Maybe this will get D barrier banned. Please Konami. I want to be able to play decks other than link decks.
@qedsoku8497 ай бұрын
Beatrice if just an ftk now, I guess.
@DeadmanPauli7 ай бұрын
I need to ask something about transaction Rollback Wen you copy for example welcome labrynth to special a Monster from Deck, and you have the field spell on Board from labrynth, can you Pop a card with that too?
@mavisb.vermilion58817 ай бұрын
No, you are activating Transaction Rollback, you are not activating a "Welcome Labrynth" card. That bonus is only added to the "Welcome Labrynth" cards.
@nerfirelia82357 ай бұрын
This card is gonna be a ruling nightmare at locals
@DubskiDude7 ай бұрын
How would Rollback interact with an Evenly Matched in grave?
@Xenonfuji7 ай бұрын
Still needs to be at end of battle phase. If you control no cards, the opponent banishes their entire field
@Tagperson7 ай бұрын
So basically when someone tries to copy Epv in the gy I’m just going to say you can’t do that and call the head judge
@MSTTV7 ай бұрын
Well, you should go to the head judge FIRST, before the event starts... and ask how it will be ruled, we will likely have a final answer by YCS las vegas or oither big events and base it off of that.
@sunnyporter86947 ай бұрын
So you said not everything before the semi-colon is cost. On your example Feather Storm and Ghost Meets Girl, How can you tell between Condition vs Cost??
@mrrogers35817 ай бұрын
Cost always includes actions like, pay life points, tribute, destroy, banish
@ryanpalmisano31297 ай бұрын
How would Rollback work with Artifacts??
@kaimobley53247 ай бұрын
Before I watch the video in my opinion if this card is allowed it should never be at 3. At most you could potentially push it to 2 but really shouldn't be more than 1
@Williamcuong-ku2zy5 ай бұрын
Can Ash and Belle negate transaction rolback if i copy Big welcome lab?
@kennethM5 ай бұрын
i just played a lab player and I wasn't given activation timing for ash.
@Xenonfuji7 ай бұрын
I love this card for letting me play through an ash in labrynth, but jesus christ the amount of degenerate shit it can do. It can do some pretty funny stuff as well, like transaction rollback target evenly matched with an empty board at the end of the battlephase
@stefler22017 ай бұрын
So it copies the virus effect or not? 😅 Or does it all depend on the judge?
@nutlow827 ай бұрын
So cards in the GY that have effect like rollback don’t activate?
@MSTTV7 ай бұрын
I am waiting on final confirmation before I drop a FINAL video on the matter. I have emailed Konami directly and I did get an answer, but I need to wait for their confirmation.
@AmericaDeutscher7 ай бұрын
So how does Rollback work with Witches Strike? So if my opponent Barrone negates any of my cards and I have Rollback and Witches in my GY do I activate Rollback target Witches and then blow up my opponent's hand and field?
@four-en-tee7 ай бұрын
Yeah, basically. This card shouldnt exist, lmao
@AmericaDeutscher7 ай бұрын
@@four-en-tee I dunno I like it. 😊
@Valkazon3 ай бұрын
So treacherous trap hole right?
@tanisparker12827 ай бұрын
I got one for you. Transaction roll back target jokers wild in GY. WHAT HAPPENS?
@michaelmorales16027 ай бұрын
Not a legal target. It's effect depends on what is sent as cost, and Rollback ignores costs, so you wouldn't be able to send anything, which means the card wouldn't have an effect.
@cephgawd7 ай бұрын
Imagine getting D.barriered twice in one turn smh
@vparsa877 ай бұрын
How is transaction rollback different than destiny hero diamond dude? Diamond dude didn't care if you had monsters on the field; you could still use a hero lives for free the next turn. Transaction rollback copying harpie's still needs you to have a winged beast on the field though?
@rorschach45027 ай бұрын
You're misreading the scenario...a hero lives is free. Feather storm requires CONTROL of a wind winged beast in its condition
@vparsa877 ай бұрын
@@rorschach4502 and a hero lives required having no monsters on the field for its condition. But you could still use a hero lives via diamond dude even though you have a monster.
@rorschach45027 ай бұрын
@@vparsa87 you got me there lol sorry, I don't play heroes and honestly had no idea. I can't give you a professional reason of why it's different, but the wording is completely different so I'm sure there's some bullshit explanation lol. My best guess is the difference in rollback becoming that effect vs diamond dude allowing you to activate that effect?
@BloodsCaress7 ай бұрын
It'll apply for the first turn but fizzles out. Rollback literally states "activation effect"
@MaexxLoL7 ай бұрын
The 3 turn thing is part of the activation effect
@RoyaltonDrummer9227 ай бұрын
Either Transaction Rollback needs to be banned or they need to ban a bunch of other cards that completely abuse it
@bobjones44697 ай бұрын
What an unnecessarily complicated game. Just copy EVERYTHING on the original card and leave it at that, sheesh. The only ruling needed is that since it banishes itself, it can't maintain the equip effect of certain cards.
@ManuelRiccobono7 ай бұрын
Coping effects are so confusing in yugioh.
@shterkz7777 ай бұрын
Thats kinda stupid asf that apparently you "cant" copy eradicator even doe you actually should
@BM-kw2tu7 ай бұрын
Alright if this is legal I want “red reboot” to 1!
@InfernitBlu887 ай бұрын
Won't do anything to TR graveyard effect
@agenttatsu7 ай бұрын
if someone activates this card i'm just gonna forfeit the match, the card shouldn't exist anyway and i refuse to learn rulings for a card that is literal F&L bait
@longface1017 ай бұрын
Question: What about using Transaction rollback banish effect to copy evenly match from your graveyard? Example: Player A: Finish building up his field and have player b discards two cards from his hand. Due to A's card effects. Player B draws for turn, proceed until end of battle phase. Attempt to use transaction rollback effect from grave to copy evenly match effect.
@mrrogers35817 ай бұрын
Yup, as long as you meet the activation condition (control less cards than your opponent), it will resolve
@rumelparker39597 ай бұрын
This card is the trap version of diamond dude
@xatuyou80457 ай бұрын
No Diamond Dude works differently. It activates the effect of the card but not as an effect of Diamond Dude and I don't think that activation can be responded to.
@donnelleraeburn92077 ай бұрын
It's been rough
@asuraXTC7 ай бұрын
This is why I don’t spending a ton on it the card will be banned
@Loxx1167 ай бұрын
Does it work with "Elemental Burst"?
@michaelmorales16027 ай бұрын
Yes
@Loxx1167 ай бұрын
@@michaelmorales1602 are you sure because it could also be an activation condition. Then it will not work.
@michaelmorales16027 ай бұрын
@@Loxx116 it reads like a pre-PSCT cost. This card has not been printed since PSCT came to be, so there's no up-to-date text to verify. But as a judge, I would rule that you CAN target Elemental Burst for Transaction Rollback's graveyard effect.
@haruhisuzumiya66505 ай бұрын
Move over snake eyes There's a new tier 0 floodgate
@KristianVuozzo7 ай бұрын
Tearlaments use this card
@drkdia48727 ай бұрын
basically what i got from this is this card is gonna get banned. ok dont buy it sounds good