Russell Brand | 'When I was arrested the accusers were called 'victims' straight away' Jim Davidson

[@LouisePhillips-bl5gg]

It’s not just Brand, Trump, Jordan Peterson, Andrew Tate, Tucker Carlson. Irrespective of how you feel about any of them you can’t fail to see what is happening to people who speak up.

[@MicheleLLOYD-bk2mt]

We KNOW that the goal is to create ANARCHY by perverting the course of JUSTICE through trial by Media, NOT BY COURTS. PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE. Social Disruption will be so great that the undeniably incompetent government will be Replaced by an APPOINTED body to run the country. It’s ALL about POWER - The Ultimate Seducer. Nothing changes for long in the evil DNA of mankind, designed and built by our perfect gods………

[@Footloose_the_movie]

Agreed, Brand is the only one I particularly like on this list but if a US president can get mobbed for speaking his mind things have gotten eerie

[@MeredithBell-v3f]

Anyone who exposed the corruption. Once they assassinated now they character assassination

[@stevieh9860]

I do despair at people like you who lump these people together as if they’re the victims of some massive conspiracy. Trump tried to overturn a democratic election and has been found to have sexually assaulted someone- innocent till proven guilty? He was. Tucker knowingly lied about the election, and Fox was forced to settle a lawsuit for $787million as a result, so sacked him. Not cancelled, fired. Brand has not been cancelled by anyone. He has been accused of some nasty stuff that sponsors don’t want to be associated with. Commercial decisions do not equal cancellation. Tate? Are you kidding me? Stop lionising these people. Open your eyes. This isn’t the establishment closing ranks against heroic outsiders. This is chickens coming home to roost.

[@3604Monkeyuface]

Rumble released a letter from the UK govt, asking them to demonetize Russel on their platform! Conspiracy theory that there is an agenda against Russel proven!!!

[@Circa1692]

I agree with Jim, our MPs are an embarrassment and a waste of tax payers money!

[@kitchenworker446]

and Diane Abbott is one of the worst...IMO

[@garethpeart7551]

And a waste of oxygen🤷‍♂️

[@michelleqs78]

Our MPs are a bunch of muppets, I think anyone that wants to pursue a role in Parliament should undergo and IQ or WAIS test and a psychological assessment.

[@leondxut]

@@michelleqs78 The problem as I see it is that decent people who could actually do the job properly don't want to go into politics because they don't want to be associated with the rabble already there. Of late anyone who does take the leap and is competent is soon weeded out by said rabble. The standards to be a politician, apart from the fact that no there need to have experience in any field whatsoever, are being lowered to what most reasonable decent people consider unacceptable levels. Dress codes and general behaviour are a case in point.

[@michaelrawson6261]

Ttfnzz:... I couldn't agree more!!!

[@matthewrobinson8886]

He’s been brought down for his anti establishment views

[@Lynnette4]

That seems reasonable to me! It's happening over and over nowadays.

[@janschkeuditz6065]

Imbecile he is the establishment, their greatest asset . A friend to the Royals perhaps even Prince Andrew ?

[@ianvjones]

and raping chicks. But mainly political views, oh, and a bit of sexual abuse, but mainly it's political. absolutely.

[@davidthomas3826]

​@@janschkeuditz6065 If Brand is the Establishment's greatest asset then they have a funny way of showing their appreciation

[@zoltan-zq3xe]

@@janschkeuditz6065 He's anti billionaire globalist elites the enemy of the working class, that's good enough for me.

[@PythonLee]

I have never liked Russell Brand but he is innocent until proven guilty

[@kennwan9917]

If more people thought like him, we wouldn't have had to be locked in, arrested for travelling out of our town, told of threats of not leaving the country etc. You should look into what he says more recently. His speciality is that he can articulate what many of us are thinking to the highest level. Creating that conversation for the masses to have. People like him are invaluable to society. Especially a society that Orwell predicted.

[@rogeralsop3479]

Correct.

[@stevetodd7030]

Not in this day and age. He is guilty whether he did these crimes or not.

[@bridiesmith5110]

But, all these accusations have been known for years. This is because he has been interviewing people that they would rather we didn’t hear about. I would like Blair to be arrested as he was the reason many young men by sending them to their deaths in a war gone into on lies.

[@archiebald4717]

What a quaint old fashioned notion.

[@peggynorton5145]

Anyone filing false claims should get 25 years

[@-______-______-]

Also, anyone who instigates the likes of this, 50 years.

[@WLBarton4466]

Women are nuttier than ever.

[@grahepo]

@@BigBillKelly-x2z wanting hoaxers to get 25 years is normal, only evil people would want these hoaxers unpunished

[@fearnothing3798]

😂😂😂 the only people that do this are women and they are untouchable. Her subjective feelings/experiences trump's all reality, throw in a few tears and a sad story and all is forgiven and forgotten.

[@toastedterps]

That's a lot of tax payer's money.@@-______-______-

[@filipasales9291]

Let's just remember the nazis had the right to a trial...this man isn't having one and is being bashed world wide. Just remember this can happen to anyone as Dan knows himself. What the hell is going on???

[@hazelhadley-britt6396]

Actually they were given a trial but were not allowed a defense.

[@sbor2020]

🤦🤦Dan? You mean Martin Branning? Or Maria Joseph?

[@ivanbaric4017]

If a woman tries to destroy a man's life for what ever reason. That being proven in court, she should be jailed minimal five years and made to pay all the costs. Gold diggers are part of life, so is the law, minimal five years to max of eight.

[@beemerrobbie]

I wouldn't even say minimum of 5 hears, make them do the sentence the accused would of done if found guilty from their lies

[@eileenspamer]

works BOTH ways you know

[@mattwyand4952]

I work for the state legislature in North Carolina . I'm a senior advisor and paralegal . For a representative in the district I currently live in . It doesn't makes any sense to me .. For anyone to say Russell would have to force himself on to a woman .. Loses all credibility with me . Russell is a lady's man . I've watched him literally pick up 8 women at the same time.. He has professional skills with women ... HE HAS NO NEED TO S.A. A FEMALE ...what I have seen women just throw themselves on him.. I highly doubt he has broken any laws. THIS IS A HIT JOB AGAINST RUSSELL BY THE MEDIA AND THE CORRUPT GOVERNMENT

[@jgcelliott1]

@@eileenspamer... Apply the same to men who lie about S.A.? Done. .

[@MrDawson1569]

@@eileenspamerthere’s always one woman 😂😂😂😂 shhhhhhhhh 🤫 women’s lib is growing old

[@leemackie8434]

I stand for Human Rights. This could happen to anyone.

[@giovannisoave9634]

Jimmy Savile, Rolf Harris, Russel Brand... When will it stop?

[@moggpiano8043]

Means nothing. Who's human rights? The accused or the accusers?

[@QigongGreyDragon]

​@@giovannisoave9634 comparing Russell to saville is an outrage. 16yo woman is sexually mature. You need educated

[@leemackie8434]

@@moggpiano8043 you didn’t watch this program or you would know what I am saying. You don’t really understand Human Rights if you have to have it explained. But both. I don’t like the man but he has rights as does the woman involved and both are not being held.

[@leemackie8434]

@@giovannisoave9634 when people who know that these things are happening speak up and women come forward as soon as it happens.

[@bible-society]

A court of law is a place you deal with these matters. If you ever get trial by television or guilt by accusation that day freedom died. - Margaret Thatcher

[@zackyboy3187]

Well done to Rumble for keeping to its mission statement

[@TheSecurdisc]

I am a fan of our Magna Carter . A thousand years of history down the drain. A citizen is innocent until judged otherwise by his peers 🇬🇧

[@sbor2020]

1,000 years? The habeas corpus didn't become an act of parliament until 1679 - during the reign of Charles II - 464 years after the Magna Carta.

[@XXXSHARONOXXX]

The magna carter is all lies just like the bible

[@SpectreOZ]

​​​​@@sbor2020Habeus Corpus was entered into Legislation in 1679 but had it's origins (Writ of Habeus Corpus) in the Assize of Claredon during Henry II's reign circa 1166, it was then further guaranteed under the Magna Carta 1215 both pre-dating the 1679 Legislation 👍

[@sbor2020]

​@@SpectreOZ Habeus Corpus is also a great stageplay by everyone's favourite living Beyond the Fringe guy: love A.B., and maybe apt for Brand: *_whatever right or wrong is, He whose lust lasts, lasts longest_* .

[@leondxut]

I totally agree. Why does the media run with these stories before anything has been reported to the police. It should be TOTALLY illegal for these parasites to publish anything until the accusers have reported the circumstances to the police, better still after the legal processes have found the accused to be either guilty or not guilty. Some, or at least one accusation against Russell Brand is 20 years old and as well being anonymous as they all are at this stage.

[@gerhard7323]

An accuser is NOT automatically a victim. What's happening to Brand is disgraceful.

[@camoltoe8]

@@murmillo666victims lol more like paid shills

[@gerhard7323]

@@murmillo666 Behaving like a disgraceful tw@t for years is not a criminal offence and if it were our jails would be filled to bursting... Furthermore while he was 'behaving like a disgraceful tw@t' he could apparently do no wrong in the eyes of the liberal establishment for nearly two decades. It was only when he became a family man and largely reformed character that said liberal establishment turned on him and that begs the question why exactly?

[@gerhard7323]

@@murmillo666 Until such time as he is charged in court they are allegations and nothing more. Equally, until or unless that happens, they remain his accusers NOT victims. Were I in the same position I would expect to be afforded the same courtesy and right along with due process.

[@skygazer6898]

@@murmillo666 IMaybe so, but when i last looked it was not a criminal offence. On another note, Brand changed his life around after conquering his addictions.

[@johngreenhorn8853]

@skygazer6898 if I murdered someone and then changed my life around what would that make me,yep got it in one a MURDERER,look in my eyes it should be innocent until proven guilty,but if this guy is guilty then I honestly couldn't give a toss for him he is and was a complete bell end.

[@thekarmafarmer608]

Since 15 years ago we don`t need any evidence to convict someone of sexual charges. We only need an accuser that is loud enough, social media that agrees enough and compensation.

[@thekarmafarmer608]

Yesterday I actually tried to give a full reply here 3 times to include an explanation of process and the problem posed by Chief Constable Bailey as well as what Europe has done (Germany dropped compo money in favour of counselling for `victims` and the claims went down by 80%). I included some facts but it kept going red and would not `post` despite not being too lengthy. I took some info out and it still would not post. Then it appeared to but when I checked it it had gone completely. I`ve really come to think that the system of information available is edited. Are people employed by KZbin to erase what they feel is `fake` news? What I wrote was factual and based on experience in the prison system.

[@conscienceaginBlackadder]

​@@thekarmafarmer608 It has an algorithm, probably no conscious human there, that blocks posts but does not show the poster it has done. You only know it has happened if you know it happens so you leave the video then return to it, when you can see if your post is not there. Posts with lynx in nearly always get deemed to be a certain meat product using whose name can itself get a post blocked, and blocked. Which is absurd when lynx are postabbl with highlighting ! The way to get them to post, is to write slashes as the word instead of the symbol, and to leave out dots and rely on readers' life savvy to tell where to insert them, as in authoritarianschoolingcouk

[@leondxut]

@@thekarmafarmer608 I have had similar experiences with this U Chube platform on several occasions.

[@ivans8543]

I think Russell should begin defamation, go on the offensive and put his accusers on the backfoot "if he's innocent", set a precedent to stop future media hit jobs ? Im not a supporter of Russell Brand, but i am totally against trial by medie !

[@italianstallion9170]

he is certainly backed into a corner it's stick or twist stay there or stat fighting his corner and prove these chicks were wrong.

[@beachlife2968]

He is at a fork in the road time, if he just quietly goes away and doesn't highlight the elite etc anymore then nothing will happen but if he goes on the offensive i think they will try and take him down and get him in Prison.They have gave him a powerful warning. The only difference with us and China is the CCP openly say that if you criticise then you are in big trouble we on the other hand give the illusion of democracy but misbehave and they will pull sneaky tricks on you.

[@jamesoneill5070]

I am of the opinion that the charges against him are robust. This is a 4 year investigation and I would find it unbelievable if the lawyers hadn't made sure that their case was watertight with witness details thoroughly checked and cross checked. And also the accusations are from people who have never met each other. The timeline of events is interesting. Brand began his You Tube in 2007 but didn't dip his toe into conspiracy theories until about 2021, some 2 years after the investigations started. So maybe he got wind of the accusations and set up a smokescreen claiming that the media were out to get him.

[@beachlife2968]

@@jamesoneill5070 I think h will be in Prison within 2 years. It will be a slow burn procedure, maybe starting with him getting taken in for questioning then his computers and equipment taken off him. I am thinking on similar lines of what happened to Alex Belfield.

[@ivans8543]

@@jamesoneill5070 I just don't buy it, 20 yr old allegations not reported to the police ? Dramatised actresses, sort and encourage by the highly trusted MM ? It's taken the police over 2 weeks to even concider an investigation ? As RB says, welcome you 7 million awakened wonders, he's a huge thorn in the state sponsored properganda, and the intent on pulling a Donald Trump on him, stands out like doogys balls and is sinister as he'll ! I dont believe they think they can prosecute him as they have already deprived him of a fair trial, they're trying to ruin him "trial by media" ?

[@No2AI]

It was not rape - the protest was the fact that he insisted on no protection “ should I get tested” implying that as a promiscuous person she was concerned- this is a plot to get him off these platforms - our freedom is on the balance.

[@mojo2679]

Freedom exited 2001

[@happyguilmore4253]

Exactly,MSM and the old hag Loraine on itv were making out she’d gone to hospital because she was raped. She didn’t she went for an STD test

[@kitkat0768]

That is what they call stealthing, under UK and Welsh court you can be charged with rape if it was not consented to. The definition or meaning of the word 'stealthing' is when someone removes a condom during sex without the other person's consent or lies about having put one on in the first place. I do not believe in guilt and punishment of this scale without a court of law being involved. We can't judge by text provided in a documentary alone. It's not for media or public to decide.

[@No2AI]

@@kitkat0768 absolutely -

[@snoozie6430]

He’s touched a political nerve.

[@paulroberts7544]

The whole narrative around rape and sexual abuse doesn't add up. This idea that women don't lie is nonesense - there are all sorts of reasons why women lie about such things. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned!! But also, when you can completely destroy a powerful man's life with a mere allegation - of course there will be political activists or even paid actresses that will be more than willing to make that allegation. I suspect that most of the women that campaign over these issues are sincere. But I'm pretty sure they are being 'weaponized'. People in high places are seeing this as a great way to destroy people that stand in their way. Think of the Epstein case. Isn't it strange that the only person in prison is a woman - accused of trafficing girls. So how did they manage to convict a woman for trafficing girls but not convict any man for having sex with said girls? Why did they go after Prince Andrew? And Cliff Richard? I suspect that was a warning shot - to let people know that no one is safe. Think of the potential for blackmail - "Do as we say or we'll destroy your life with rape allegations"

[@Anon-xd3cf]

Women don't lie... Believe all wome... Okay... Let Lucy Letby go then...

[@andreaking7432]

Absolutely! Bill Clinton was one of Epstein’s best friends and stayed as his guest at his home and used the private jet. Somehow nobody has gone after Bill Clinton about it. And how convenient that security cameras were turned off in the 20 minutes before & after Epstein’s “suicide”. The timing of Russell Brands accusations is exquisite.

[@pearlford121]

I dont think anyone has said women dont lie.of course women lie. i lie to my husband every day about what iv bought as he is a tight b.tard with money.even MY money. But u seem to have a problem with women in general. There are more decent women out there than the handfull of gold diggers may i add. But u are entitled to ur comment !!

[@1990-t1j]

'Just have a look at our MPs... grow a pair' Jim's correct.

[@cricketbat09]

They are 'accusers', not victims.

[@TaxingIsThieving]

You're a moid, not a 'guy'.

[@methylene5]

If this happened *when* Russell Brand was on trial, the media would be prosecuted for contempt of court. Yet before the trial it's okay?

[@jemzargo]

Even the UK parliament is weighing in demanding he be demonetized on Rumble. On the basis of allegations.. What business is it of the UK parliament?

[@JonDingle]

Brand should go to the police himself and make a counter claim/complaint of false accusations made against him.

[@ra.h.8840]

His lawyers must’ve already done that. The big guys are after him to silence him, though. Hence, those false allegations against him.

[@rahuldahoob]

He won't because he's a.... Nonce

[@Binaural_Alchemist]

HOW DO YOU KNOW THEY ARE FALSE ACCUSATION? YOU DON'T, SIMPLE AS THAT. JUST LIKE I DON'T KNOW HE'S GUILTY AS MUCH AS I HAVE MY SUSPICIONS ABOUT HIM.

[@edenbreckhouse]

Referring to those making an allegation as a 'victim' is simply inaccurate and helps reinforce the narrative that the person is guilty even before they've had a trial. A proper journalist would not do such a thing. Sadly, we have very few proper journalists around these days.

[@Dave7heRave]

Cancelled him just as the online safety bill passes... how convenient!

[@alanserjeant4947]

Brand was the cover headline to get it through past the plebs.

[@criscross572]

Even if he was found innocent they would only say well they just couldn't prove it, now he's been named he will always be guilty in some people's eyes.

[@pedroloco9327]

That’s the whole point of trial by media. All of this publicity over these allegations surely taints a fair trial , how can a jury be selected now ? Sadly so many live by this rule, whether they like someone or not is enough for them to believe any allegations made. Social media has been weaponised to control the masses .

[@simonjess8471]

Are you a Prince Andrew supporter?

[@alanserjeant4947]

@@simonjess8471 Because the age of consent in England is one year lower than America Prince Andrew didn't technically commit a crime.

[@simonjess8471]

@@alanserjeant4947 Well thank you for the legal lesson. The USA does not have an age of consent, as it is managed state by state. The range is 16-18. I think that you mean that we have an age of consent that is higher than some states? The girl in question was clearly trafficked to Andrew for sex, which is of course illegal. The victim also outlined having sex with him in NY, where the age of consent is 18. Rape!

[@lesleymaclennan7899]

Exactly

[@tonywilt4179]

If someone waits 10 to 15 years to say something, and it's to major media outlets instead of law enforcement. That person is either after fame or money.

[@hazelhadley-britt6396]

After even a year of not being reported to the police with no evidence, it should not be a charged or investigation by police. You should not even be allowed to "give your story" to the media. Go to the police. Report the crime with actual evidence. Not edit a text about protection or no protection and claim it to be about rape.

[@alanserjeant4947]

Yes, being paid by the newspapers who no doubt are coining it in.

[@paulinefoster1126]

Follow the money every time

[@heatherchandler1184]

@@hazelhadley-britt6396this needs to be a thing. Legally media should require at minimum police report before publishing anything.

[@olly7248]

Or they now live in an age where they can tell their story 🤨

[@nancymcgee4776]

Innocent til proven guilty!

[@georgehudson1353]

Yet no one, including creepy rapey Dan Wootton, took that approach with Phillip Schofield though. Funny how their mates are innocent until proven guilty, but people they don't like are "well, it's only a matter of time until the truth came out". Anyone, like Dan, who takes double standards on sexual assault is a piece of shit. Until Schofield is charged by police for a crime he should be reinstated on This Morning, wouldn't you agree?

[@wolfu597]

Today its 'guilty until proven innocent'.

[@maccagrabme]

I don't believe any of the accusers until I see the evidence, so far this is a witch hunt. Where is the story on Hugh Edwards or is he going to get away with it all because he claimed mental illness? This is beyond a joke trying to get him deplatformed from Rumble now, hopefully he has seen the light about the system and is now far right as they call it.

[@richardgallagher4880]

This is utube. You don't say this about anything but wrong0n3s

[@winstoningram99]

Neither until proven either, actually.

[@bettywho67]

This is the western version of social credit system.

[@nataliedoyle4701]

Very good point!

[@zoltan-zq3xe]

It's like a creeping Maoism, anybody who understands history and politics can sense it.

[@zoltan-zq3xe]

I stand with Brand 100%

[@sp-pz8uc]

You wouldn't be much good on jury service.

[@kevphillips02]

@@sp-pz8uc You always stick up for what is fair until there is good reason to do otherwise so I disagree .

[@janetwestwood9194]

Russell Brand touching up a minor in a London park was taken down years ago... just saying 🫡🫵

[@markjohnson3196]

@@sp-pz8uc Speaking the truth will get you arrested these days.

[@eileenspamer]

more fool you

[@christineperkins4451]

This is truly wrong and disgusting, Innocent till proven guilty, they are ruining his life with no hard evidence whatsoever!!!

[@Murphystar]

All eyes on Russell Brands Truth videos. He’s waking more up now.

[@vincentdegennaro3375]

The problem is MP’s are ignorant, and really should be gagged on any legal matters especially, when zero charges have been made..

[@paulagolladay6713]

True statement - none of us have all, or even any, of the facts; therefore stop the trial by anything but a court of law. That court can either be in the US (I think one of the incidents being sited happened in the US) or in the UK. Now I am a woman and I am a survivor of rape. The person who raped me was ever captured, at least not for my rape incident. I have no idea if the person went on to rape other women. I am not a woman who believes all rape or abuse claims made by a woman, or a man, are 100% accurate. Once all, or as much as possible, evidence from all of the accessors and the accused, is gathered and verified only then can arrest be considered. If an arrest happens that does not make him automatically guilty. An arrest only allows for a trail date to be set. Long post, yes, I just want a fair eye placed when gathering and examining the evidence and should a trial be required that too should be fair. At this point in time with the media blasting everything across all possible channels how in the world will a jury be selected? I am confident in saying that those called for jury duty would be tainted by all that is being presented long before even an arrest. Stop please.

[@MicheleLLOYD-bk2mt]

HmmmmmWe KNOW that the goal is to create ANARCHY by perverting the course of JUSTICE through trial by Media, NOT BY COURTS. PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE IS A CRIMINAL OFFENCE. Social Disruption will be so great that the undeniably incompetent government will be Replaced by an APPOINTED body to run the country. It’s ALL about POWER - The Ultimate Seducer. Nothing changes for long in the evil DNA of mankind, designed and built by our perfect gods………

[@Michael-hm8cs]

The jury well has been poisoned

[@suzieqou8129]

Russell Brand may be cancelled by some but I have not cancelled him and I believe there are a lot of people who haven’t cancelled him. #istandwithRussell

[@rorywhard3077]

I have always hated the man but after this I am fair square behind him

[@sandraspadina8883]

I would like to know what happened to Jim's accusers. Why are they not named and shamed for their offencers

[@hazelhadley-britt6396]

Because they are nameless people in society. The UK allow accusers to be nameless to protect their identity. There are 2 I know of who were charged for false accusations against men who were claimed by the accusers to be part of rape gangs. I have my opinion why those females were charged and convicted but not others.

[@sandyjuntunen4088]

I made a comment several months ago on one of Russell's videos they'd be coming after him, bc he's told the truth about so many things. All of this is rotten, no reasonable person buys any of it. Edit: came back to add- I' ve never liked him. Didn't subscibe to him- just saw some videos. But I still think he's not guilty.

[@Happyharold666]

I STAND WITH BRAND

[@50hellkat2]

False accusations and the facilitators of them should be criminally charged.

[@terenceballands3321]

Brilliant!❤🇬🇧

[@nathanielc2480]

Rumble received a letter from UK Parliament , asked them to demonetise his channel , it's extremely ridiculous a govt will ask a private company to take action against their citizen who's allegation still not proven guilty.

[@janingram1076]

Russell was targeted for telling the truth

[@morganm4768]

@@FionaDougherty How is that a crime?

[@ukar69]

Diane Abbott playing the race card? Surely not! 😂

[@surfaceten510n]

The only race Diane Abbott could win would be the three legged race as its the only one that you need two different pairs of shoes

[@ce244]

​@@surfaceten510nshe can count that high ? 😂

[@stephenford2758]

@@surfaceten510n JIm Davidson is not in any position to criticise anyone's intelligence!

[@stephenford2758]

Thick and Thick is Jim Davidson!

[@michaelholt7994]

If I was brand I would sue all of those women and MSM.

[@paulroberts7544]

If it's true what people are saying about the government demanding social media companies close down his account - can he sue the government?

[@Stumpybear7640]

Including that dumbass mp!

[@wattage2007]

They'll just close his bank accounts. That's what they do nowadays.

[@AlexandraK1]

I hope he does.

[@sp-pz8uc]

If he doesn't, you will know why.

[@FloatingCroc]

Comedian first and British icon but secondly could easily supersede 95% of the so called parliamentarians with his no nonsense approach and transparent approach

[@olly7248]

“British Icon” 🤣

[@rahuldahoob]

🤡

[@stephenford2758]

Comedian,??? Calling a black man chalky white, that is sOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO unfunny!!!

[@stephenford2758]

Dim Jim@@olly7248

[@FloatingCroc]

@@stephenford2758 bet your fun at parties

[@peacefulheart9228]

gestapo after people telling the truth.

[@quiltycatlady108]

What kind of woman doesn't report this to the police before gong to the media? This is utter nonsense! Russell should sue these women and the msm for all this ridiculous ness.

[@AGfrom83]

The kind who knows she'd be breaking the law if she went to the police with her horseshit.

[@thornbird6768]

What kind of woman waits 20 years to spout her horseshit ?

[@angelawainman7020]

I agree with Jim Davidson, innocent until proven guilty.

[@conscienceaginBlackadder]

Our America-compliant media never challenge or report? that since at least the 80s, US border control violates presumption of innocence, gives a worse entry status to folks with an innocent arrest record and is allowed to judge their character from it, and asks "Have you ever been arrested or convicted?" as a single question. Because the political and media elites have no interest in fighting it, since as recently as 2016 Canada has started doing it too.​

[@DennisMcCoy-b2r]

Not taking a side yet because I don't know enough but what about the women? They have to be innocent of false accusations until proven too

[@conscienceaginBlackadder]

@@DennisMcCoy-b2r Quite, and this is where it's dangerous that thick easily led mobs can't absorb challenging reasoning. Both sides simultaneously have to be presumed innocent. For neither one does that oblige presuming the other side guilty. That means, for both sides at once, each side has to be treated as if the other side was guilty, and not treated as if they are guilty.

[@helengeorge9754]

Who could trust the MPs these days .😮🙄

[@janeshannon8712]

I can’t believe parliament wrote to rumble and asked them if they will follow suit with youtube and make sure Russell aint being paid wtf how are they allowed to be involved its not even gone to court ???? Russell aint Russia u cant just sanction him into a confession all this seems so unjust imagine if this was a loved one of urs would u find this all onesided from the start 🤷‍♀️

[@DaveGreeneramblingcarpenter]

Surely Russell brand is now in a position to bring charges against channel 4 and the accusers

[@krzysztofdaszkiewicz5088]

If you go against corruption, you are guilty if you go with the lies you are innocent. That's how we roll these days😮

[@peteroderick104]

I stand with Russel brand. He got the ellite sxxting their pants.....

[@barryh1477]

Jim Davis, you are spot on

[@SharonTateFan67]

Jim Davis played Jock Ewing in Dallas

[@dixienormous2440]

Jim Davis??😂

[@stephenford2758]

Jim Davis played Jock Ewing in Dallas. a talented gentleman American actor. Jim Davidson is a low brow British comedian.@@SharonTateFan67

[@anyoldorion]

A complete ‘take down’ Even someone from Parliament has written to Rumble CEO requesting they demonetise Russell. It stinks of Murdoch to me.

[@SpectreOZ]

*Rumble shut down the UK Government request to suspend his Social Media rather elloquently, innocent until proven guilty* 👍

[@carla.p2795]

At last Diane Abbott gets what she deserves after years of getting away with all sorts!

[@JAMESBALL-f4e]

All we need now is for them to put him in the Ducking Stool or a Trial by fire and weve gone 350ish years back to old allegations that weren't true.

[@zoltan-zq3xe]

Or Mao's China dragging people through the streets with ' Rightist' placards on to humiliate and terrify the population, even though Brand comes from the left his crime is reaching out to understand other viewpoints, to them he's a hectic.

[@janetobi2193]

You make excellent observations about our new and questionable justice system. It applies to most of us, if they like you, your innocent and if they don’t your guilty. What is evident from RB’s situation is that trial by media is unacceptable and must stop.

[@sa9861]

Don’t be silly - the law does not deal in likes or dislikes. It deals in guilty or not guilty.

[@mistertwist]

​@@sa9861No you're silly if you don't think there is corruption within the legal system. Judges, jury, solicitors can all be bought but this hasn't even reached that stage and probably won't. The damage is done from what could actually be complete bs.

[@pedroloco9327]

@@sa9861so how do you explain wealthy people getting off or lighter sentences than others? I have a friend of over 30 years , in his mid twenties he did something stupid. He assaulted someone and it was caught on camera. Before his day in court the video evidence “ went missing “ from the police station. Just so happens that his dad is a Freemason.

[@mojesus680]

He's Guilty of Telling the Truth 🗽

[@stu0508]

The irony of Dan Wooton covering this considering what happened with Depp vs Heard. The guy should be in jail.

[@mrc7593]

Absolutely right! The argument that car pollution is killing thousands of people, but if you pay £12.50 then it’s all alright! Utter nonsense! It’s just another Tax!

[@GlenDog]

Accusers should be referred to as 'accusers', not 'victims' from the outset. They shouldn't be referred to as 'victims' until it's established they are likely 'victims' in a court of law (and it's not guaranteed they are guilty even then, especially as the government, police and judiciary are driving towards unsound convictions, training police to automatically believe SA accusers and lowering the threshold for proving guilt to artificially increase the conviction rate for their stats). Russell being named in the media, etc., guarantees huge harm and distress to him and those he loves on so many levels before any guilt is established. He should remain innocent until proven guilty in a court of law (and even then, see above). It's utterly wrong and insane.

[@sharonrush731]

Brilliant Jim , says it how it is

[@anonymouse740]

If you're a man all it takes is an accusation to strip you of your income and your public image. That's a sad world. Don't get me wrong if you're convicted of sexual assault that's something completely different but to just be accused? Anyone can accuse anyone of anything, how the hell can that be the standard we go by?

[@ukar69]

I see the UK government wrote to Rumble asking if Brand was still able to make money from the platform despite the allegations. Even the government thinks guilty until proven innocent.

[@jaymac7203]

When just being accused of a crime is enough to have your life turned upside-down, then this is no longer a free country. It's disgraceful. If he's found guilty, then he will be punished. But until then, he's presumed innocent.

[@conscienceaginBlackadder]

You realise that the America-compliant media never challenge or report? that since at least the 80s, US border control violates presumption of innocence, gives a worse entry status to folks with an innocent arrest record and is allowed to judge their character from it, and asks "Have you ever b arrested or convicted?" as a single question? Because the political and media elites have no interest in fighting it, since as recently as 2016 Canada has started doing it too.

[@denis9450]

Anybody putting forward false claims and they are proven to be false should face the same punishment the accused would have got if they were found guilty and that includes the media

[@joedudz]

Everything these four women say appears heavily scripted. I predict this will be another Kevin Spacey episode but they will have achieved their objective of de-platforming him.

[@Maddy-qd8eg]

If Russell is de-platformed it will be because he has served his purpose. And let's hope that these woman don't end up like Spacey's accusers- three out of the four met untimely deaths.

[@alanserjeant4947]

And the odius "Online Safety" (censorship) bill slid through while the plebs were redirected and distracted. You can't make this stuff up.

[@zoltan-zq3xe]

Exactly, however I believe he could come back stronger he has lots of allies, time will tell.

[@AntzWar]

UK law - 'innocent until proven guilty', our government and many industries seem to have forgotten that important law in place for human rights, if Brand is found guilty then you take action to punish him but not until then

[@conscienceaginBlackadder]

You realise that the America-compliant media never challenge or report? that since at least the 80s, US border control violates presumption of innocence, gives a worse entry status to folks with an innocent arrest record and is allowed to judge their character from it, and asks "Have you ever been arrested or convicted?" as a single question? Because the political and media elites have no interest in fighting it, since as recently as 2016 Canada has started doing it too

[@sandrajones1609]

I don't know what happened in his past but believe this has much more to do with shutting him up and guilt or innocence are incidental. He and his team have been exposing that which was "allegedly" purposefully hidden ✌️

[@iancharlton678]

They just want to shut him up……. Whatever it takes 😶

[@agnesvanya2329]

The Dispatched doc is so obviously manipulative. The camera angles for the actors (not the actual accusers!), the ominous music, etc., reminiscent of the H&M schlockumentary. I'm not falling for it. If Russell Brand's accusers can bring facts to court, he should go to prison. If they have falsely accused him, they should go to prison. Simple as that. Until he's in the dock, if that ever happens, leave him be -- whether you like him or not.

[@martindelport8289]

"Two egg boxes short of a supermarket" brilliant 😂😂😂

[@fionahesketh]

Bless you Dan and Jim and anybody else who has been tried by media ❤the time has come for the media to stop this practice

[@Twmpa]

Women. If you think you have been raped/sexually assaulted, your allegation will have much more legitimacy if you report it to the police immediately afterwards rather than waiting for decades before telling newspapers or TV channels.

[@allystevens7036]

I heard Jane Moore on Laura Kuennsbergs show on BBC1 on Sunday, say that some of the the women had been to the police at the time, but nothing was done.

[@paulroberts7544]

@@allystevens7036 presumably because there was no evidence of a crime. There is this assumption - one that everyone is compelled to go along with - that women don't lie about such things. As a 60 year old woman - my lived experience tells me otherwise. I get that it's awful for women that truly are raped. To not be believed. But you simply cannot believe all women to protect the women that are telling the truth. Because the end result of that will be the ruin of many innocent mens lives - and ultimately a complete breakdown in society as honest men won't feel safe sharing the same spaces as women. Women will be left with only rapists for company.

[@johnnylatham9738]

​@@allystevens7036did you check to see if what she said was true

[@lesleybrookes5022]

Innocent until proven guilty!

[@conscienceaginBlackadder]

You realise that the America-compliant media never challenge or report? that since at least the 80s, US border control violates presumption of innocence, gives a worse entry status to folks with an innocent arrest record and is allowed to judge their character from it, and asks "Have you ever been arrested or convicted?" as a single question? Because the political and media elites have no interest in fighting it, since as recently as 2016 Canada has started doing it too.

[@mrshadenoughofallthis911]

MPs should not comment. There is no way Russell Brand can have a fair trial if he is ever charged.

[@robshaw3655]

You see some channels happy that brand is being cancelled and preventing him having the right to defend himself ...same channels disable comments. Guilty till proven innocent..

[@sa9861]

Who are those channels. Not on msm where the consensus is innocent till proven guilty.

[@ibme6073]

But people are complaining about trial by media so surely you cannot have him pleading his case on a social media platform while being paid for it.

[@leefair9598]

Only way they can shut him down !

[@viorica8402]

Why so late, 11-17 years later? Why not going to the police first? Why going first to the mass media, knowing the very unfair treatment by the tabloids of everything, in UK? It's disgusting! Hit job.

[@fineweather4569]

I should think those women would have lost count of the number of c%@#s they’ve had…

[@wboyle9721]

Justice is done by a court of law not by media outlets

[@alexbowman7582]

Brand should sue the government who sent a letter to Rumble in an attempt to stop him being paid.

[@petecoventry6858]

Look what they did to Sir Cliff... says it all

[@martinheath5947]

I am no fan Of Russell Brand But who were those guests On Ep Steen Eye Land

[@stevenclarkson1853]

The Damage is done.

[@janeburgess50]

I think Russell Brand is being slaughtered in a trial by media and it’s absolutely appalling. Whether he’s innocent or guilty is a matter for the law to decide. I personally don’t particularly like his old persona, but channel 4 made a fortune out of his seedy, pervy persona…..they were happy then to support him..then he broke away, got healthy and started to help people to become healthy…and spoke out against the corporations and individuals causing huge harm for mankind. Timing is everything isn’t is! Trial by media will backfire on everyone either way, guilty or innocent..the media will ensure it. Anyone defending Russell is receiving warning shots across the bows…Beverley Turner was ambushed by her odious co host on live tv…was he paid extra to do it, no coincidence that Bev is outspoken against the very topics Russell is!

[@theco-conspiriters]

We are not stupid… this feels like a set up to shut him up!!!!

[@annstar4306]

I stand with Russell , he is not a rapist or any other term used 😡. Long ago he had addiction issues and after this protocol he came good and has dealt with relapsed and overcome and Russell always been transparent in all his interviews and books 😀. Go Russell !!! You wont lose us will always be with! you ! Thanku Russell for standing for truth and along with us all WE DISCOVERED THE LIE ! 🙋

[@littlejosunnyshine]

Xxxx

[@Jack-fs2im]

I have an addiction to abortion and drugs and alchohol and bully dogs and gambling and porn and supporting criminals but I have changed

[@janncoons7445]

We respect and love Russell Brand❤

[@TheDerangedBlood]

All this is shedding a light on the real issue. Guilty until proven innocent. All they got to do is create a documentary, make some accusations and then watch the media fuel it like wild fire. No trial, no arrest....scary times.

[@teslaandhumanity7383]

Govt trying to remove him from Rumble now .

[@Ndev725]

MPs should know better that trial by media is not the right way and if they can’t deal with that they need to stand down

[@alanserjeant4947]

But the odius "Online Safety" (censorship) bill slid through while the plebs were redirected and distracted. You can't make this stuff up.

[@barbaragillett9904]

Totally agree with you Dan 🙏🙏🙏🇬🇧

[@JoeBlowUK]

All I can do is recall my own experience with some gold digging women. They hear you have a few bob, then lead you along, even get engaged... then drain you of every penny, then when the money has gone they drop you like a hot potato. I suspect that some of those types might have latched onto Russell, thinking they would have a future with a rich and powerful man, then when HE dropped them, they were full of anger, so now it's payback time.

[@Felled-angel]

Oh thats so said 😥 😔 you poor man..I've got an idea ! Let's put all our money in one pile and split it Jokes aside It is a sh*ty thing that happened to you though.

[@wattage2007]

The tool of choice for angry women; reputation destruction.

[@pearlford121]

There is certainly a lot of men with grudges against women on here.but let me tell u it also works the other way around men that use women for money.I for one dont give a dam about money it doesnt make for happiness!!

[@shaunussy]

Whatever is said on these videos, the comments sections are very telling. There is no death by fire here. Nobody is believing anything right now - the common and overwhelming thread is that Russell is being attacked and is innocent until proven otherwise. I firmly believe that Russell will live through this and come back stronger in the event nothing is proved.

[@alangriffiths2100]

If you go through the process and subsequently proved innocent people will still say,”there is no smoke without fire.”

[@conscienceaginBlackadder]

Not just people. Do you know the America-compliant media never challenge or report? that since at least the 80s, US border control violates presumption of innocence, gives a worse entry status to folks with an innocent arrest record and is allowed to judge their character from it, and asks "Have you ever been arrested or convicted?" as a single question? Because the political and media elites have no interest in fighting it, since as recently as 2016 Canada has started doing it too.​

[@walterkaiyuenpang3556]

Hey Dan ... Did you apologise to Mr Depp yet ???!!! 🤔🧐

[@markennyee]

why is there not a time limit law of statute like there is if you get horribly injured and badly represented by greedy solicitors either scarp all time limits of apply them to everything that is life changing prove it or be arrested and charged for making false allegations

[@iainbaker2742]

​@@ekl2947with the obvious exception of children, adults shd feel a moral responsibility to report these crimes to police for the sake of future victims, whether they want to bring fwd charges or not. Also, and on a serious note, how could anyone prove consent 10yrs plus after a one night stand?....

[@markennyee]

@@ekl2947 so myself being battered black and blue sometimes with weapons as a child by my farther is ok ? or should I sue him before he dies I haven't spoken to him for over 35 years for that very reason

[@markennyee]

@@iainbaker2742 I do hope he sues C4 for millions

[@Anonymous56657]

Stop introducing Jim Davidson as a legend. He is a legend in his own mind.

[@ingerlander]

Russel Brand was once a rabid pinko, then he grew up. Becoming conservative gave him morality and he confessed his sins. Unfortunately for Brand, it wasn't what he may or may not have done to women that was his crime, he had left the reservation and that is the ultimate sin. Bollocks to the women, they are merely props in the never ending persecution of those who do not obey and submit to the 1984 agenda

[@zoltan-zq3xe]

100%

[@carly2981]

Innocent until proven guilty. A few h..... got paid so he is guilty !!!!!! Shame on all these women