thank you for this! I had snatched up a 7900x3d during amz prime day and was debating whether i made a bad choice not waiting for the 9900x, im happy with these results :)
@Wen-k1p2 ай бұрын
Are the results true?The frametime from 9900x is much more stable than 79x3d
@johnpaulbacon83202 ай бұрын
Interesting results. Why is that you put the 1% and 0,1% lows display in the opposite position for each cpu? I feel that makes being able to see the overall comparison not as easy. Maybe this can be fixed in future videos and maybe change the color of the text for those.
@beyondspecs94012 ай бұрын
It happened on some of his recordings to have inverted the 0.1 - 1% on the OSD. It would be insane effort for him to rerun all games just for this, we are seeing the results just fine. Otherwise the results are totally expected. The 3D parts greater strength is average fps. Lows are jittery compared to "usual" cpus (amd non3D-Intel) which use brute frequency to achieve the results and boast more predictable performance. It is common knowledge since the very first 3D model that cache performance is unpredictable and varies depending on the game but these days even a simple reality check on AMDs products is met with a horde of red army attacking you. 😂
@kris-nr5yb2 ай бұрын
Cpu test is only 1080p
@CHERBEUS42Ай бұрын
Ахуенный тест процессоров с 99% нагрузкой на видеокарту, браво🎉
@goldenbird29942 ай бұрын
test cpu, 4k resolution! ok ))
@BudgetGamerz2 ай бұрын
Because he doesn't have a 9900x and is faking the benchmark like everything else on this channel