SAMP/T - Aster 30 | Best air defence system of Europe goes to war in Ukraine

[@WeaponDetective]

Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other French Systems videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LoxjAFtfDr8wwS6K_51gZ0x Please click the link to watch our other Italian Systems videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_Lo5raRe1cYoFJwNqraDhvXk Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Land videos kzbin.info/aero/PLEMWqyRZP_LpFkS9hH3KD9uTEKBDVQZRp

[@radovandoderovic9179]

TOP GUN CONTROL

[@nishantshrivastava9674]

Plz also make a vid on Israeli Spyder and Barak 8 SAMs.

[@MB-em9ek]

A fruitful collaboration between France and Italy.

[@jacoproita9010]

just like with the Horizon class and the FREMMs

[@Strategikos]

Good video as usual! As a sidenote, Aster (Αστήρ) also means "star" in Ancient Greek.

[@Ezekiel903]

French and Italy are very good together, from ships to missiles, they produce high quality weapons

[@thomazbonetti1981]

Always very good videos!! thats why i follow you... really appreciate it!!

[@wiktorberski9272]

Really interesting movie. Btw: I have heard about Operation El Dorado Canyon, but never heard about the Libyan response.

[@lionelroussel7371]

Il en faudrait plus

[@mohammedsaysrashid3587]

It was a great doings by (weapon detective)... informative and clearly introduced of this air defense systems against blastic missiles and other missiles...thank you for sharing

[@rossg4788]

Excellent

[@4evaavfc]

A few of those working together will knock a few imperialist invaders from the sky. Thanks for the well researched video.

[@visualserge]

I hope you featured next Spyder System from Israel 😊

[@aramisone7198]

You are thinking of the upgraded Spyder SR/ER 20-30km range and MR/LR 40-80km .

[@bigmike9128]

I agree

[@aramisone7198]

I would like to hear more about Barak X but also about South korean MANPADS.

[@jean-michelvanpruyssen936]

The latest news from Ukraine is that they like it very much. They have to fire 2 Patriots to get an enemy missile, whereas they only need 1 Aster.It's more efficient and less expensive.

[@MrStrat01]

French technology 👍😍

[@howiehowdy]

Lol not really true

[@jean-michelvanpruyssen936]

@@howiehowdy It's less expensive because it's more efficient. This is what Ukrainians told Xavier Tytelman.

[@arsenijearsen3041]

​​@@jean-michelvanpruyssen936 friend don't believe anything west media say.

[@autoastro8461]

@@howiehowdy This information is correct, only one Aster missile is needed compared to the Patriot system which often requires more than one missile.

[@grzegorzczerwinski9541]

What happens to a missile booster when burned-outed? Does it falls on the ground? Or flies to the target with rest of the missile?

[@SergeNNM]

Retour au lanceur

[@autoastro8461]

Auto destroy systeme

[@eagelseye8089]

It is the best long range air defence system of the west as a direct competitor to MIM-104 Patriot For mid range the best would be either Iris-T SLM or CAMM And for short range Iris-T SLS

[@aramisone7198]

How much does a battery cost ?

[@Leptospirosi]

I think CAMR missile batteries will also be on offer for Ukraine: These missiles are much cheaper and a better option to bring down slow flying drones, while the Expensive Aster 30 will focus on protecting from Ballistic and Cruise missiles shot form far away by ships and Russian bombers. It's a bit cynic to say, but dealing with real weapons will offer invaluable data to tweak and improve performances for MBDA

[@咖哩余]

This begs the market demand for incoming ballistic missiles and drones to be able to broadcast signature signals that show them as drones (for missiles) and as missiles (for drones) so as to trigger the wrong response from the defenders to send the inadequate countermeasures...

[@Leptospirosi]

@@咖哩余 I think speed and distance will dictate the use of the missile, if options are available in place. This being told, missiles are not the solution against slow moving targets: as we are seeing in the red sea, 80% of the drones and cruise missile intercepted were brought down by the 76/62 at about 6km distance, making it the most effective air defence for military objectives, Not so much for large city areas. A Draco 76mm system would do wonders in Ukraine if available, being so much more range effective then the current 25/30mm, especially in round consumption.

[@olivierpuyou3621]

👍👍

[@PpAirO5]

I don't get it. Depending on what video you wathv about the SAMP/T System you see everything from 100km - 1000km range 🤷‍♂️? Why this hugh difference in capability ?

[@derekhenschel3191]

Because it has multiple different missile variants like the patriot system does

[@chayanatchusiangjaew8054]

Can you do s400 or David's sling pls ❤

[@bud4792]

They did s400 about 2 years ago, go to their page and have a look

[@chayanatchusiangjaew8054]

​@@bud4792thank guy❤

[@Remie1529]

Can we have a update video, so we can get to know how it does in Ukraine

[@seinfeld11123]

you said in the video that i can detect ballistic missiles up to 1,000km away. yet the radar can only detect up to 120km. whats the point of having a missile capable of 1000km when the radar is only 120. or did you just make a mistake. cause the missile size is about the same as the patriot which is 250 ish km range

[@derekhenschel3191]

The naval varient can intercept missiles up to 1000km away. With the right radar and boosters the land one probably can aswell but. Since Ukraine doesn't need to cover that much ground with it they use a less expensive shorter range radar rather than wasting a massive one

[@seinfeld11123]

@@derekhenschel3191 no the creator is just wrong. the version in Ukraine has range of 100-120 km so the 1000km is obviously a typo. the NG version which is being made now will increase to 150km its a little weird the wording. it says its capable of tracking and detecting SRBM of 1500km and MRBM of 3000 miles. which is just a way of confusing it. it doesn't matter what range the ballistic missiles have. it only matters when it detects and when it can intercept them. and that is track with radar at 150-100km

[@derekhenschel3191]

@@seinfeld11123 also the reason they use those terms for what range of ballistic missile they can intercept is because ballistic missiles are categorized by there range because the longer range it is the bigger it is. So for instance that means that it can successfully intercept a ballistic missile built to have a range of 3000 km. But if it had to hit a ballistic missile with a range of 10000km then it might not have the mass and explosives to completely destroy it. It's the same reason why in Iraq patriot battery's could intercept iraqi scuds but they would still hit targets because the earlier missiles didn't have the mass, speed, or payload required to completely destroy the entire missile

[@seinfeld11123]

@@derekhenschel3191 i understand it, so do you, but the creator interpreted that as if the air defense system could detect a SRBM at 1000km and intercept out to 1000km. which is just impossible. as i said. the wording they used is a little naughty and its easy to just interpret it at 1000km is the detection range... I doubt even s400/500 cld do those numbers we both have seen how bad the s300/400 has done in Ukraine

[@aramisone7198]

Isnt this a very expensive system ?

[@bertnl530]

One has different types of costs All these systems cost a lot of money, but there are also the running costs and the costs of the people operating it. Such systems have to run 30 or 40 years with updates. 30 years of having people on a system and train them costs also a lot of money.

[@robertnemeth6248]

The British Royal Navy is upgrading its ship based ASTER 30 block 0 to the block 1 land standard.

[@Ezekiel903]

ITA and FRA are highly successful in maritime weapons and ships!

[@gyyaaatt]

i have a realy interesting vehicle for you its georgian APC called LAZIKA made by ccts delta company founded my the georgian millitary i would love it if u make a video about it nobody did it

[@rhoelg]

Damn that amount of money New Zealand has saved for not owning and keeping any of this and any other earlier version like Hawk that most countries are retiring unused lol :) Let just say the strategy is to gamble on low probability of sacrificing civilian life and properties for more guaranteed economic savings given the geographical location! Whereas Singapore might be more vulnerable to air attacks hence it could be a wiser investment for them.

[@derekhenschel3191]

Well actually Australia and the United States are responsible for new zealands long range air defence

[@aceofhearts573]

Do Iris-T. Ukraine got like 2 of them

[@valiantone395]

Had those were destroyed in April

[@aceofhearts573]

@@valiantone395 damn, Russia is working fast

[@Stephanthesearcher]

@@valiantone395 source?

[@kornofulgur]

@@Stephanthesearcher Source: Trust me bro.

[@TheTryingDutchman]

Yeah we make like 200 missiles a year for these things so they aint gonna do much for a long time.

[@majormoolah5056]

One patriot system costs a billion! That is like twice the asking price for a S-400. So I have to wonder about the cheap price you mentioned... it is more likely that people buy Patriot because it is an American system

[@PerSkeles]

10:58 and the second cold war started 24.2.2022

[@bramsamladena6007]

why would turkey buy aster if they already buy s-400? (asking for a friend)

[@benghazi4216]

S-400 is a long range system. This is more of a mid range solution. AA is all about layers.

[@MrRalboi919]

​@benghazi4216 Also the Russian S400 sucks !

[@MrRalboi919]

Russian S400 is Hot Dumpster juice ! TRASH

[@benghazi4216]

@@MrRalboi919 Not at all. It's good system, one of the best in the world. It's older sibling the S300 is preventing both Russia and Ukraine from getting air superiority. What the Soviets did well is AA. It had a key role in their doctrine.

[@IsaacKuo]

I don't know about Turkey's specific situation, but other countries such as India buy from both the Soviet/Russians and the French to reduce their dependence upon a single supplier.

[@radovandoderovic9179]

TOP GUN CONTROL

[@radovandoderovic9179]

HAND MADE USA

[@radovandoderovic9179]

Google maps

[@Rzeznik4]

Its not 3000 km of range, you have lost your mind

[@hilwaamanamankiyar-pp5bf]

66489

[@williamrussell3811]

When this is all over we can strip mine Russia for every resource they have and then Bob Iger can make a real BIG Disney world!!! After all there will be lots of CHEAP labor!!! Can you imagine a vodka infused micky and minnie, worth the price of admission alone!

[@matovicmmilan]

And what happened when you woke up? Wet bed? 🤣

[@williamrussell3811]

rolled over and saw your mom@@matovicmmilan

[@SergeNNM]

Mieux vaut lire comment s'est passé le mot "Bistro"🤣

[@habahan4257]

Good video. Russia can perform 1000 kamikaze drone attacks in a few months. In other words, Ukraine has Aster 30 stock, enough for a few months. It seems to me an expensive and meaningless military aid.

[@jantjarks7946]

Gepard 🤺🪖🤔

[@Aendavenau]

Tell that to the woman and children that are alive thanks to SAMP/T shooting down Russian attacks

[@JD96893]

Not when that drone is about to take out something more valuable than an aster 30... Although I doubt they are being used any where near the front line where you would see these drones. More likely being used to protect bases or ammo dumps where a 100% hit chance is needed and the value of the target is high. I think another reason Ukraine is getting this system is because they are scared things might escalate to nuclear. This system fills a vital role in Ukraine's IADS(integrated air defense systems) providing long range defense against ballistic missiles at ranges around 80km. I don't see why this would be used to take out a drone generally speaking. It would be like hammering a nail with a sledge hammer. The right tool for this job would be SHORAD systems(short range air defense). Something like a gepard or zsu 23, or any number of other systems.

[@yarmud]

i remember macron thinks sampt is equal to patriots or s400 while talking to trump.

[@remistiegler5302]

​@@yarmudwhich caracteristics ? Interception rate, rocket speed ? Price ? Range of the radar ? Its ability to see drones ? We talk about air defence, the missile range alone doesn't make a system good

[@arsenijearsen3041]

You forget that part of Russia is in Europe, so Sampt is funny in comparison.

[@AO-ow6tt]

Best of luck in Ukraine. Even systems claimed to be much better did not survive the Russian missile strikes.

[@derekhenschel3191]

Russia hasn't destroyed very many ukranian air defense systems so I'm not really sure what you are on

[@AO-ow6tt]

@@derekhenschel3191 If they are not able to prevent Russian missiles attacks, that means their defense systems are already "kaput"!

[@derekhenschel3191]

@@AO-ow6tt russia hasnt conducted a successful missile or drone attack on long range targets in 6 months ukraine has been shooting down almost 100% of every attack recently, so i guess by your logic that means the russian rocket force has gone the way there navy has

[@AO-ow6tt]

@@derekhenschel3191 Oh yeah, and that's why thestupid clown in Kiev has been running in an out to beg for more air defense systems from his US-NATO gang bosses?

[@jean-michelvanpruyssen936]

Shut up, Russia is falling apart.

[@tadzdgreat]

Another overrated wonder weapon only to be destroyed by Lancets 😂😂😂

[@habahan4257]

Another overrated wonder commenter only to be destroyed by Lancets 😂😂😂

[@williamrussell3811]

Yes im sure if will fail! because the Russian equipment is working so well🤣🤣🤣and their army is sooo goood!!😝😝

[@remistiegler5302]

With 40 km range ? A SAMP-T battery has 3 times more range than those blyat drones. And the Groud Master 200 radar attached to it can see drones very well as a very modern system. Cope harder Ivan, we all saw the "effectiveness" of the russian wunderweapons on Patriots, very funny😁

[@night8285]

All I see is that the Russian wonder weapon, the almighty, the greatest, *S-400* , can't even intercept a himars rocket and even the storm shadow. 😂😂😂😂😂

[@yfelwulf]

German IRIS T was a dud. Patriot lived up to its reputation and failed miserably AGAIN Stormshadow 😂 what can you say killing civilians it's great against military targets a failure keep up tgecomedy gold

[@bruceyawen6160]

How was IRIS T a dud? The missle performes as advertised and is considerably cheaper than even a PAC-2. Good enough for stuff like cruise missles

[@jantjarks7946]

Source is trust the orc trolls? 🤺🤷🤣

[@night8285]

Bruh! Russian *S-400* can't even intercept HIMARS rockets, the same S-400 system that was touted to have the capability to intercept an F-35. What a joke!

[@YdfGs-sp6cn]

No never .s-400 triumph is best air defense and atack . 🇦🇱🤝🇷🇺💪💪💪💪💪💤💤💤💤💤

[@derekhenschel3191]

Not really but ok

[@jean-michelvanpruyssen936]

They're being wiped out in Crimea. They can't even defend themselves.