Specs for the Guide 17 Price: $139.95 at Running Warehouse Weight: 9.4 oz, 269 g (men's size 9), 8.1 oz, 232 g (women's size 8) Stack Height: 35 mm / 29 mm Drop: 6mm
@save8217 ай бұрын
😊
@stubestrong6 ай бұрын
Any thoughts with ASICS GT2000/12 vs Guide17 ? I use the GT2000 but find heel strike to far back makes pure gel redundant. Great on mid and fore foot. Switch into guide15 for more support when fatigued as it’s supportive and smooth.
@crawdaddy0195 ай бұрын
Thanks Matt!
@jvl483225 күн бұрын
I’ve been using the Guide for several weeks now and do really love them. They do their job when it comes stability(really! ) and feel very light and extremely comfortable without sacrificing stability. Nice laces that are somewhat elastic and stretch lightly for a snug fit. I do recommend trying this shoe.
@wreaverfizzlefen32347 ай бұрын
Matt, would you consider this the natural successor to the stable neutral Endorphin Shift, or would you recommend another model for Shift runners now that it's being discontinued?
@ireadandplay6364 ай бұрын
I Just got these love them!!!
@davidclark70507 ай бұрын
Matt, will appreciate a Guide 17 vs GT 2000 v12 (your favorite) comparison review. Thanks
@DoctorsofRunning7 ай бұрын
Out later this week
@jenniferring64102 ай бұрын
I finally had to tap out on this shoe. I've worn many Guide versions over the years but this one just isn't working. I'm blaming it for my post-tib flaring up again. As comfortable as it feels for long runs, the drop is too low for me and as a heel striker, the rocker just seems to make my foot work harder to move forward. I get that we're 'rolling' forward but when you start on your heel it feels like I have to run up and over the shoe on every step. I was in Hoka shoes for a couple of years but due to their lack of durability switched back to shoes that lasted longer (Saucony) and hadn't had an issue since. I get what they're saying with the stability engineering, but in reality it feels like it's a stability shoe for someone who really doesn't need stability.
@Echom4-kr5el2 ай бұрын
Lower drop shoes always irritates my post tib. I’d love to try the Hoka arahi though, but… I’m sorry to see a lot of companies going lower drop and less stability. Had some luck with the kayano 30 but they’re a bit bulky. I’ll try the 31s.
@BlackPawGaming2 ай бұрын
@@Echom4-kr5el thery are all bulky now, see the guide 17 is now bulky same as Kayano. 16 is better.
@jakej7227 ай бұрын
One thing that drove me slightly mad in the last two Guide models had nothing to do with performance: The powerrun-PB removable insole squeaked with every single step. Does the 17 suffer from the same problem?
@jenniferring64106 ай бұрын
Same experience! Over time it also sounded like there was a suction cup on the bottom of my left one.
@MadLadsAnonymous6 ай бұрын
Hope you compare this to the Tempus 2 when it comes out!
@Adamas114 ай бұрын
Yes, please! I’ve been running in the Tempus for about 1.5 years. I really like it but looking for something with a little more support and thinking the Guide 17 could be a good choice.
@jenniferring64106 ай бұрын
This sounds perfect for my long, easy runs again. Love the Endorphin series but couldn't deal with the Shift and I do need guidance. I've been using the Tempus for longer races and long runs but I needed more of a plus, easy run shoe. I got the Asics Gel Kayano 30 for that purpose but I've never been in love with it. Looks like this is my answer.
@BlackPawGaming2 ай бұрын
this thing is same concept of control as Kayano, if you hate Kayano. you will hate this one.
@markspinozzi28826 ай бұрын
Stability is going in a new direction with a wider platform, more stack height. I haven't tried the Kayano 30 or Guide 17 yet but curious what they're about. I did see one review about the Kayano 30 , after 100 miles the heel started to wear because of the extra foam.
@BlackPawGaming2 ай бұрын
I hate the way it going. now every shoes going higher becoming all Hoka .:D
@themanorruns7 ай бұрын
Great video! Do you feel like with the more pwrrun plus that the ride 17 lost its stability?
@grey_fox76 ай бұрын
Guide 16 was way to firm to enjoy any runs longer than 8 miles for me. Sad to see they kept the same midsole. Not sure if a new sockliner is enough to change things enough to make this shoe more comfortable for longer runs?
@jakej72225 күн бұрын
My impression is the 17 feels more plush than the 16. The 16 also had some sort of PB-Sockliner.
@amymcdonald20507 ай бұрын
Thanks! On a scale of 1-10, if I loved the 16 (on my third pair!) and adore the Tempus…how much will I like the 17? Can’t wait to try on foot here in Australia soon
@jes288997 ай бұрын
How would this compare to the Gel Kayano 30?
@Adamas114 ай бұрын
Guide 17 or Tempus 1 (or 2)?
@shrewseddy7 ай бұрын
How does it compare with the Tempus?
@snowwalker99997 ай бұрын
Wasn’t Tempus made for faster runs?
@shrewseddy7 ай бұрын
@@snowwalker9999I guess, but it will do slow runs too so I'm not sure why the guide still exists.
@mikepenn50367 ай бұрын
I train exclusively in Guide 15s and Glycerin GTS. I'm currently training for my first marathon and wish I had shoes that were nearly as comfortable as the Glycerins, but over the same amount of mileage as the Guides, though without the intrusive shove away from medial (flat feet and pronate, but only mildly). I hear your suggestion of this new Guide 17 for long runs-- Would you consider it for an easy-pace marathon or would it become uncomfortable after 20 miles?
@yocjyo2 ай бұрын
Can this be used as a daily or just race shoe?
@javierparedes18986 ай бұрын
How does this show compare to the brooks glycerin gts
@pervyducky3 ай бұрын
Guide 17, hoka arahi 7 or brooks adrenaline 23?
@erinmalette72767 ай бұрын
How does it compare to the gt2000 v12? The rocker looks better on this one.
@DoctorsofRunning7 ай бұрын
Will be out later this week!
@erinmalette72767 ай бұрын
@@DoctorsofRunningperfect!!
@kuriosites7 ай бұрын
So, Saucony will have the Guide, the Hurricane, and the Tempus.
@DoctorsofRunning7 ай бұрын
We’re not sure, but our understanding is that the Hurricane is not a stability shoe any more.
@kuriosites7 ай бұрын
@@DoctorsofRunning Based on what I saw from TRE videos, it's at lease a very stable neutral, like the Shift 3.
@Carlosediaz5437 ай бұрын
There’s no way this is still a stability model?! Right? Like is it in a max cushion category. To me it’s wild they made a true max cushion , rockered, stiff.. etc. seems to me like a bondi really
@BlackPawGaming2 ай бұрын
they change guide series to be max cushion line.
@Carlosediaz5432 ай бұрын
@@BlackPawGaming ik, so did the kayano and pretty much everything else. It might just be but I’m kinda tired of the whole 40mm max cushion,rocker with toe spring and heavy shoes
@jakej72225 күн бұрын
What's interesting is that the Guide 17 is noticeably a fairly flexible shoe for something labeled "stability". Comparable models from Asics, Hoka, etc are quite a bit stiffer in construction. You can see this for yourself with a *gentle* in hand bend-test and twist test. It seems that Saucony is approaching stability in their new way this time around, really prioritizing the wide platform to shape the running mechanics.
@grcigar99117 ай бұрын
Moving the Guide away from traditional stability is asinine. It’s like Saucony discontinued the Guide and slapped the name on a new neutral rocker shoe with barely there foam sidewalls. Also, the rubber on the sole appears almost nonexistent which is also asinine. This shoe should have been a new model and is a slap in the face to loyal Guide customers. 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
@DoctorsofRunning7 ай бұрын
The new Omni 22 essentially role swaps with the Guide, so for the moment Guide fans will still have an option just with a new name.
@erinmalette72765 ай бұрын
@@DoctorsofRunningI’d love to see an Omni 22 review then
@BlackPawGaming2 ай бұрын
Guide series is now max cusion shoes... shame.
@stubestrong6 ай бұрын
returned my guide17, its a odd shoe. over engineered bulky upper, grip poor. GT2000/12 better shoe in all areas