P2: Forced Hijab | Mahsa Amini: Islam, Media, Politics & the Hijab | S. Ammar Nakshawani

----
Click Here to Subscribe & keep updated with our latest videos on our Channel:
/ sayedammarnakshawaniof...
Follow Sayed Ammar on our social media pages:
Facebook - / sanakshawani
Instagram - / sayedammarofficial
-----

[@ali_irani]

My view as Iranian youth who supports hijab rule : Recent issues in Iran isn't just about wearing hijab! I defend hijab because I see it as a front-line of Islamic state and If we give it up people may want also open relationships and alcohol and gambling and homosexual rights and all other western diseases! some youth in Iran see West as an utopia and most of them blame Iran for everything from US sanctions and economic crisis to their personal life failures! They are captivated by western media and are suffering from Stockholm syndrome! I don't bluntly defend the Iranian government but I can't stop myself from blaming these people ignorance and awkwardness!

[@corpsefoot758]

And if women violate it, then what? You’ll beat them up?

[@user-el4ht2qd1f]

Stay bleesd

[@mohammedhassanakbari6722]

This situation is in no small part due to Khamenei's High Handed & Domineering Approach. Its like as if he has xXxTopPpeD Mentally ProgresSsing!!!...

[@unconscioususa8903]

@@corpsefoot758 When a person is killed by police no matter the reason I that police should be held accountable, I support the right of Iran to enforce the hijab but not beat someone if it not worn properly fine them , jail them couple days or community service

[@aliraza44315]

coulnt have said any better 👍

[@whitehorse9545]

Mr Ammar by this speech you have declared " Your War" against the Iran's Islamic Republic and you declared you support the enemies of Iran, who are Israel and USA also you proofed you have not knowledge of why in Iran is obligatory to wear hijab. instead you shamlessly appear in public and share your own miss undrestanding about the law of Hijab in Iran. by this speech you also declared to your listeners that you are not someone they can trust anymore!!

[@corpsefoot758]

Stop typing your nonsense novel and answer this simple question: Are you able to show us a single example from Quran or Ahlul Bayt of physical punishment being promoted against improper hijab? And make sure to cite the exact text & source in your answer

[@alimoeed2577]

You have answered all my questions without me even asking any. I am a Shia coz I studied Islam not coz I was born in a Shia family. You make so much sense with everything you say.

[@fakhrunnisaversi5796]

Agree

[@thecominglightofgood583]

If you are a Shia then you must know Hijab is indispensable. Secondly, before deciding on a matter you need to check all angles. Propaganda against countries and cultures isn't a new thing.

[@alimoeed2577]

@@thecominglightofgood583 My brother I’ know what Iranians are like and if they get slight bit of freedom Iran will be like France or even worst. Islam says follow the law of the land

[@thecominglightofgood583]

@@alimoeed2577 You are right. 🇮🇷 should overcome this propaganda threat. Long live Iran.

[@thecominglightofgood583]

@@alimoeed2577 The law is one and only. The law of Allah. But one should respect the laws of a country one lives in till they are not contrary to Islam. Iran has every right to emphasize on the compliance of it's laws.

[@moaleali]

Some statistics in Iran say that about eighty percent of Iranian women wear hijab and want it. Those you see on the street who don't wear hijab will be naked if there is no hijab law. Hijab is not only a personal law but a social law, it can be implemented in the society. The state of religiosity and hijab of women in Iran is not what the media say. The problem of the western media with Iran is not the hijab, but the Shia Islamic government.

[@brihannelafaque1418]

You are right

[@ShahidR82]

the problem is not with the law. You can't walk around the west naked, that is illegal. Iran has their own dress code laws. The problem is that the judge, jury and executioner is 1 man. Therefore, the punishment doesn't always fit the crime. In fact, it rarely does in these cases. Antagonizing people by harsh punishment's is not effective in accomplishing the goal, in this case being compliance with hijab. Why not issue a ticket and a fine and be done with it? If i speed, i get a speeding ticket. It will prevent me from speeding, but at the end of the day, it's not that big a deal. And i am able to fight the charge if i feel its not warranted. Appropriate and proportional response is key. No society has freedom, but at least have justice. And Iran is certainly not just.

[@tsp320]

Do you know how an Islamic jurisdiction works? There are 10s of institutions and a whole council of professional & scholars who confer before any thing is passed. 1 man is a western fallacy & a narrative that fits many preconceived notions about the islamic REPUBLIC

[@ShahidR82]

@@tsp320 so why didn't she have her day in court? Because the officer who arrested her (one man) decided not to allow it? Was he a scholar? Did he sit on the board of one of these 10's of institutions? Is death justice for her crime?

[@tsp320]

@@ShahidR82 huh? she didn't commit a crime. She broke the minimum covering requirements in an Islamic society.. she didn't follow the law of the land and was taken to the police station for correctional guidance alongside other women just like every other person is. Then collapsed, we've seen the cctv footage countless times and her CT scan showing no signs of physical or bruising as confirmed by her fathers statement, external forces have twisted the situation. What court date were you expecting & for what?

[@ShahidR82]

@@tsp320 so she didn't commit a crime. Yet she was detained at the least. U ask what court date, and for what reason. I have the same question. Why detain, why did it even go as far as taking a sister as a captive for not wearing a head scarf as the arresting officer saw fit. We can complain all day about the west or Saudi or every other place. But why do we not apply the same critisizm to Iran. Laa iqraha fi deen

[@tsp320]

@@ShahidR82 It is not to the 'arresting officers' liking or one 'mans' decision, they are simply carrying out the minimum public covering law mandated in an Islamic society to prevent moral deviance & corruption. If one doesn't follow this, they are not detained and beaten..they are taken to the police station to listen to a lecture on how to adhere to the rule. Please stop believing western saudi financed media machine, surely we'll be held accountable brother. Also it is best if we do not take verses of the holy Qur'aan out of context or to our own liking InshaAllah, just how they have been weaponised by our enemies. What is meant by the ayah according to ulema is not that Islam has no obligations/law or that in Islam one has no legal obligations but that accepting [Islam as a] religion is something that cannot be achieved forcefully considering faith is when the heart leans and actual conviction cannot be imposed. This has nothing in relation to laws or public implementation of islamic legislative code in society but rather beliefs.

[@berthabaig4520]

may Allah will keep you very close to Imam Ali in the hereafter, the veil is a protection for all of us, I was born in a Christian family, been shia for 40 years

[@linusabdulai5030]

wow

[@ahmedelbahja6301]

Alhamdullilah for Sayed Ammar. What a great servant of Allah (SWT).

[@corpsefoot758]

@@Flookiiee Khamenei isn’t even a real Ayatullah or Mujtahid hahaha Their stupid rules-committee had to change their own standards overnight just to squeeze his ignorance onto the throne. What an embarrassment

[@Xena517]

They are always afraid of one who speaks openly. May Allah protect you and increase your knowledge.

[@corpsefoot758]

@@Shia.Ahlulbayt Ironic you pathetically try linking Sayed Ammar to dictators, when an ACTUAL dictator like Khamenei is letting his goons crack civilians’ heads all over his own country while pasting his face all over the buildings like Stalin 🙄 Projection 101. Nice try buddy

[@corpsefoot758]

@@Shia.Ahlulbayt Nobody who beats women for improper hijab is “my brother in faith” Un-Islamic innovation, with zero connection to the Thaqalayn, is a Sunni tradition. You are closer to them if you follow Khamenei’s made-up rules, sorry

[@corpsefoot758]

@@Shia.Ahlulbayt “Accusation”, really?? So are you DENYING that Khamenei’s laws have zero basis in Shi’a literature? Okay: go ahead and PROVE that any of our Ahlul Bayt once physically struck a woman for violating hijab. Go ahead

[@wafaajamshid14]

May Allah bless and protect Dr Sayed Ammar Nakshwani and his family from anything bad 🙌🏻🙏

[@kousarabbas687]

Forced Hijab, Islamist terrorists, etc are terminologies best suited for islamophobia. Why Ammar is using this? No one is forced for wearing an official Chador. Ammar is strengthening western propaganda against Muslims' obligations.

[@corpsefoot758]

So you’re claiming Iran’s morality-police have never ONCE physically beaten a girl for improper hijab? Are you sure about that?

[@kousarabbas687]

@@corpsefoot758 What is happening in Iran is not about Hijab. Many women do not wear official Hijab and Mahsa was not beaten. Separatist elements are benefiting the most those like Kurds and Baloch also get opportunities. Ammar himself is a follower of Sherazi based in UK who has disagreements. Some 40 police officers have been killed. Do you still think, Police are killing and the Rioters are peaceful? Western media is a weapon as in the case of Nayirah's testimony. Iranians are well educated and remained under sanctions by the same powers now crying for women's rights. They will not listen to anyone and keep the country safe from foreigners. 15000 killed was also a good joke recently.

[@corpsefoot758]

@@kousarabbas687 Are you denying physical beatings are a punishment used by morality-police, against women with improper Hijab?

[@kousarabbas687]

@@corpsefoot758 There is no such punishment. In morality centers, they only address about Hijab without any force. I have told you already, Hijab is not an issue but all those propagating all these lies are part of media war against IR. And no police is perfect, we should also keep eyes on behavior of police in USA, France etc Last things, western propaganda machinery is at fore front in spreading disinformation , a good example is Novel, Reading Lolita in Tehran in which it is mentioned that police was raping female prisoners on order of Khomeini. This was lie and all these happening now are same

[@hardcoregym7316]

Islamic societies need public dress codes. This is common sense.... Freedom has no limits. Religion sets the limits.

[@hardcoregym7316]

Sayed, you are a great historian !!!!!!!! Islamic law & politics require another level of wisdom and responsibility.

[@zehranaqvi5341]

May Allah protect you and your family! It’s important to discuss these different points of view.

[@thecominglightofgood583]

Dear Sister. Those matters have already been settled by your great grandfather the Prophet of Allah SAWW

[@corpsefoot758]

@@thecominglightofgood583 The Prophet promoted beating & jailing women for misusing their headscarves? Show me a single piece of evidence from either the Quran or Hadith which proves this is true, otherwise admit you are lying about our own Holy Prophet

[@thecominglightofgood583]

@@corpsefoot758 Since you are a corpse commonsense won't get into you! The Prophet SAWW didn't beat anyone for sure and his station was lofty. But may I ask you how many women came out in the streets throwing off their clothes and other items? Secondly, just because an obscure case is being propagated about Amini who died under circumstances still not distinctly clear gives no right for protests and filthy propaganda.

[@thecominglightofgood583]

Haha misusing their headscarves! That was a good one.

[@thecominglightofgood583]

@@corpsefoot758 The Quran says make a party that enjoins good and forbids evil. This gives an Islamic State the authority to impose law for an effective social order.!

[@abbas-t3140]

Can anyone pls send the link for the first video of this series 🙏

[@konkerkanker8450]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/aZKpf6ejnsSkpcU

[@loverzzone9499]

Search in KZbin it's v.simple

[@hassantalat8238]

MashaAllah. Jazaak Allah khair

[@syedrizvi5387]

In France, hijab is not allowed in government offices, schools and universities. If this law is violated, wouldn't the government take action against that person? So how is it an issue of violating the human rights of that person? One has to abide by the laws of that country or face consequences.

[@corpsefoot758]

Do French cops physically beat women for wearing a hijab? Try to focus on the entirety of details involved, thanks

[@unconscioususa8903]

Amen brother. European countries say you can’t and it’s ok, we’ll were is it’s my right to choose concept the West pushes as one’s freedom. I can’t wear hijab. So do not tell me about human rights when you speak with a fork tongue

[@avrilfatima160]

If France has not allowed then there is a reason ....if anyone has a problem and wants to wear hijab can go and live in Iran...

[@thecominglightofgood583]

@@avrilfatima160 Good. Then please issue passports to these revolting ladies in Iran. Send them to France!

[@corpsefoot758]

@@unconscioususa8903 Two wrongs don’t make a right We can condemn French discrimination and Irani brutality all at the same time

[@alikassar]

Mashallah you’ve hit the nail on the head! May Allah swt bless you and keep you safe sayed ❤

[@MilahanPhilosophersCorner]

Interesting.

[@pinkbbdragon7938]

Salamu alaykum, thank you for speaking about such topics

[@alimoeed2577]

Isn’t Islam which says follow the law of the land so people should follow it

[@Amir_Ali_12]

I believe Sayyid Ammar did "a punch under the belt" before about Imam Khamenei with his speech before about British Shiism, which he also apologized for on his Instagram.

[@KazMaw1]

"Islam as a religion wasn't inspiring anymore" This point is the epitome for the entire topic. We can tell non-muslims about how much friendly Islam is but coercion is one of the main reasons they simply will not convert. Another point no one brings up is we don't punish for other sins that MEN commit but whatever women do we go up in arms as they somehow definitely have to be controlled. And it's only MEN that do this.

[@shadianasralla8407]

May Allah protect you and your family

[@sakeenaraza2625]

Iranian clergy should follow the Prophet's sunnah: lead by example not by forcing religion down people's throats. What is happening in Iran is only a natural consequence of Iran's harsh morality laws and is only going to get worse if Iran does not change its strict policies.

[@corpsefoot758]

Amen. I wonder where these Irani geniuses get their inspiration from, because the entirety of our Ahlul Bayt only showcased the pinnacle of morals

[@ghalibahmed6676]

Are you saying Islamic law and federal law can never and should never coincide?

[@corpsefoot758]

@@ghalibahmed6676 We’re saying Khamenei’s circus-regime is proof you cannot achieve this without an infallible leader, genius Khamenei’s Iran is showing the world WHY human beings should stop trying to enforce Islam without any guidance from Allah whatsoever, and instead spend 100% of our energy in bettering ourselves until Imam Mahdi considers us worthy of his blessed & needed presence

[@razabadass]

Thanks sayed bro :)

[@ALI-om2re]

If there’s no tradition for penalizing Women for not wearing Hijab ( 🧕 ), then there should be no law penalizing women for not wearing Hijab. If there’s no tradition penalizing men for not lowering their gaze ☺️ , then there should be no law penalizing men for not lowering their gaze. Ijthad is meant to simplify Islam not over complicate it or bring your own version. *my family wears Hijab so I’m pro Hijab (meaning pro Allah command) but I don’t like that because of made up penalties it has become politicized and giving a negative image to Islamic Law. Speak a good word, don’t fine, whip and jail, come on now, certain thing aren’t meant to be implemented from fallible human.

[@ghalibahmed6676]

The thing is the consequence of the gaze of the male is dependant upon his intention. But the law is that all females must wear a scarf on their head.

[@ALI-om2re]

@@ghalibahmed6676 I’m speaking on the gaze that are apparent. Either way my point is if there isn’t tradition for penalty that how can there be one that distributed. Let me know if you know why…

[@corpsefoot758]

@@ghalibahmed6676 Can you show me a single example of Ahlul Bayt beating women for improper hijab?

[@Billionaires_Muslimmotivation]

I like his tolerant and liberal view. God bless you Sayed Ammar ! 🕋🤲 Good that you opened the comment section .

[@ItachiAli1993]

I'm sorry my sister but what was so 'liberal' Khahar jan?

[@thecominglightofgood583]

And there are no person views. The views of Masomeen AS are the absolute ones we have to follow.

[@corpsefoot758]

@@thecominglightofgood583 I wonder when Khamenei will finally begin to follow Ahlul Bayt’s example So far he’s a lot more like Stalin. Shame

[@Billionaires_Muslimmotivation]

@@ItachiAli1993 The perception shouldn't be just black or white. There are also grey colors in between. His stance is not radical...like the Wahabi or Salafi worldview!

[@claudiotavares9580]

He is everything but a liberal. He's just being the rational and impartial academic he studied to be.

[@salahuddinmerrill7520]

Thank you so much, dear Sayyed.! I have been waiting for someone in the Shia academic community to courageously speak out on this issue which effects us all. I was so disappointed initially in October to only get limited coverage of the protests from Western media sources, with their own secular/globalist points of view, while our own scholars were silent… I am a new Shia, by the way, having converted from Sunni Islam during last Ramadhan while in Algeria. Your inspirational videos were instrumental in giving me a totally new understanding of the history of our Holy Faith, which is itself veiled in Sunni circles. So thank you for all your hard work over the years. You are true hero to me, and have helped make me a better Muslim, and a stanch follower of Ahul Bayt. Stay strong, my brother! Our prayers are with you. Salaam.

[@nurettinsaiad2270]

MashAllah Brother

[@onlineclasses8222]

786 Merci bien de permettre les commentaires ! Soyez assuré de mes prières quotidiennes pour vous, et ce, depuis plus de 2 ans, cher Sayed : qu’Allah vous garde, vous protège de tout mal et du mauvais œil, que votre honneur demeure intact, qu’Il accroisse votre savoir, vous empêche de faire des fautes , vous accorde la santé et exauce vos vœux les plus chers ! Aameen !

[@alimoeed2577]

If majority Iranians given freedom Iran would be like Dubai and us Shias look up to Iran as the biggest Shia country. May be its best what the Iranian government does. Long live Iran long live Pakistan

[@thecominglightofgood583]

Dubai is the Las Vegas of Middle East. No believer would want that to happen!

[@alimoeed2577]

@@thecominglightofgood583 I totally agree

[@alimoeed2577]

Thanks my brother

[@thecominglightofgood583]

@@alimoeed2577 Bless you brother.

[@corpsefoot758]

Speak for yourself. I “look up to” ONLY the Thaqalayn, not Khamenei and his band of abusive buffoons If he can’t make people come to Islam without beating them senseless, then maybe he needs to ask himself why people don’t take him seriously. His akhlaq is severely lacking, as is his knowledge (he’s not even a real Ayatullah)

[@sadafalnashed2789]

Thanks Sayed I have much respect for you. May Allah swt bless and guide you always 🤲🏻

[@tinalang34]

Thats good, you let people comment now

[@hasanalmosawy7957]

Looking forward to the next lecture. Dont worry Seyad, we will always remember you during our prayers.

[@sayyidyousafkazmi]

November 12, 2022 Was Hijab Compulsory During Prophet Muhammad’s Time? Salam Sheikh, Many people here-and there are saying that hijab was not compulsory during the time of the Prophet (S). They say, the Ayah about wearing the Hijab 24:31 is addressing people who want to be considered Mo’minat (believing women), and not just regular Muslims or even non-Muslims. Others say that the Islamic Hijab was mandatory on ‘believing women’ only to be distinguished from non-believers and hence female slaves did not wear the Hijab at that time. If you could provide some insight especially with references, inshallah, that would be greatly appreciated. Answer: Salam, Thank you for your question. You have quoted several misgivings. For clarity I will deal with each one separately. 1) There are ample historic and biblical evidence that Hijab (i.e., ladies modest dress including a headcover) was common women’s clothing prior to the advent of Islam. Undoubtedly, today’s cosmetic and nude secular culture is unprecedented in human civilization. Therefore, Islam did not initiate the Hijab, rather has modified and improved it. The following are some evidential examples: a) According to the Talmud pious Jewish women would wear shawls over their heads when they would leave their homes. (J.B. Hurely, Man & Woman in Biblical Perspective, p. 270) b) Wearing a veil to cover the hair was also mandatory on Christian women in public places such as churches. St. Paul in his first letter to Corinthians says: “If a woman does not cover her head, she should have her hair cut off; and if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, she should cover her head. (1 Corinthians 11:6) c) Wearing a veil was so commonly practiced prior to Islam that the Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World, though mistakenly, claims that ‘the practice was borrowed from elite women of the Byzantine, Greek, and Persian empires, where it was a sign of respectability and high status.’ d) Please Google the term ‘wimple’ to find out how a typical European woman was covered during the Middle Ages. e) One of the best sources for the study of the Jahiliyya (the pre-Islamic era) culture is the poems of their famous poets. Unlike how it was portrayed in the film ‘the Message’, and similar Hollywood productions, ample evidence from the Jahiliyyah poetry indicate that head covering was a common clothing amongst the women of the Jahiliyyah era. For example, Al-Nābigha, was a very famous poet of the Jahiliyya whose poems were hung in the Ka’ba in Mecca. His death predated Islam. In describing the wife of one of his friends he says: Similarly, Hassān; the famous poet who lived before and after the advent of Islam, in one of his famous poems satirizing Abusufyan says: In conclusion, wearing a veil was already a common practice prior to Islam amongst Jewish, Christian and even pagan women of Quraysh though not to the Islamic requirement. Thus, as mentioned above, Islam has only modified and improved it. 2) As for the Ayah of Hijab 24:31, let’s first read the Ayah: “And tell the believing women… that they must draw their headscarves (Khimar) over their bosoms…” a) The Arabic verb Le yadhreb na is an imperative verb which clearly indicates that Hijab is an obligation not an option. Thus, one of the conditions of embracing Islam for women was to observe the Islamic dress code. Umaima Bint Roqayqa came to the holy Prophet (P) to pay allegiance to him and Islam. Allah’s Messenger (P) said “I pay allegiance to you (in Islam) that you make no partners with Allah, … and that you do not display yourself like that of the times of Jahiliyya.” (Musnad Ahmad, vol. 11, p.437) This evidence indicates that even the Jihiliyya Hijab (i.e., covering the hair but displaying the neck and bosom) was not enough in Islam. b) As mentioned earlier wearing a headscarf was already a common practice. However, women’s necks and bosoms were often uncovered. Thus, the Almighty Allah is asking them to also cover their necks and bosoms with the long ends of their headscarves. c) With regard to the difference between ‘believers’ and ‘Muslims’: In the terminology of the Qur’an, ‘believers’ refers to whom we call today ‘Muslims’, whether fully practicing or not. Hence, the Qur’an often invites the believers to believe (4:136) to repent (66:8), to be pious (57:28), etc. Some of them disliked particular divine orders and even disputed with the Prophet (P) (8:5-6), yet the Qur’an refers to them as ‘believers.’ Similarly, the title of ‘Muslim’ in the Qur’an is used both for those with the least faith (49:14) or the highest level of faith such as the Prophets (2:128). d) The expression of ‘Mo’minat’ (believing women) does not negate the obligation of Islamic Hijab on non-Muslims living in an Islamic society. It is rather used as a motivating factor to encourage Muslim women to observe Hijab. For example, if an Australian PM in his public address says: You Australians give people a fair go! He does not mean non-citizens (PR or tourists) can be unfair! The expression of ‘believing women’ implies that if you do not abide by the law, you are a hypocrite or a disbeliever. To show you how incorrect the differentiation between Mo’minat (believing women), and others is in your quoted question, let’s look at the preceding Ayah where the Almighty Allah says, ‘say to the believing men to lower their gaze and guard their private parts.’ (24:30) If the expression of ‘believers’ excludes non-believers, then there is no obligation on non-believing men to lower their gaze nor to guard their private parts (in avoiding adultery). Because according to this claim, God would only be addressing ‘believing men’ to lower their gaze and guard their private parts! e) Unlike Christianity that deems women’s headscarves as a symbol of man’s authority, women’s headscarves in Islam are part of their modest social behaviour, because clothing is a social behaviour. In order to obtain and maintain a social modesty, Islam has ordered men (and women) to lower their gaze, as it has ordered women to dress modestly. Imam Redha (a.s) in describing the wisdom behind this law says: “Looking at the hair or similar parts of women-married or unmarried- is forbidden, for it provokes men and leads to molestation and sexual corruption.” (‘Elalu-Sharāye’, vol. 2 p.565) 3) As for the Hijab of female slaves: a) Firstly, according to that claim, the exemption from Hijab applies only to female slaves. Thanks to God there is no more slavery and hence no more female slaves such that we would need to discuss their exemption from Hijab. b) The main source of this misconception is a misinterpretation of Ayah 59 in Surah 33 where the Almighty Allah states: “O Prophet! Say to your wives and your daughters and the women of the believers that they must draw their cloaks (Jalābib) close around them (in public). That is closer to be known(as modest women), and thus they may not be molested, and Allah is All-Forgiving (of the past mistakes) Most-Merciful. Some exegeses of the Qur’ān suggested that the phrase ‘closer to be known’ means ‘closer to be distinguished from the female slaves!’ They further claimed a context for the Ayah that when the wives of the Prophet (P) were going out at night, some hypocrites of Medina used to harass them and when one complained to them, they would justify that we assumed they were female slaves. Upon that the above Ayah was revealed to distinguish the outer clothing of free women from female slaves! (Al-Durrul Manthour, vol.5 p.221) They further narrate that whenever Umar ibn Khattab would see a female slave wearing a headscarf, he would pull it off of her head and would not allow her to dress like free women. (Kanzul-‘Ummal, vol.9, p.199)

[@sayyidyousafkazmi]

We cannot agree with the above interpretation and fabricated narrations for a number of reasons: I. This interpretation clearly implies that Islam does not care about the molestation of female slaves! Obviously, this is in conflict with all Islamic standards. Thus, even some scholars have explicitly denounced this interpretation. For example, Ibn Hazm; a renowned scholar in the 5th century (A.H) commenting on the above interpretation says: “As for refuting the claim of distinguishing free women from female slaves, that is because the religion of Allah is the same (for all), and the nature of females (in attracting men) is the same in free women and female slaves… and thus, that interpretation is undoubtedly false… this is a blatant lie of a liar, for it means the Almighty Allah would allow the sinful people to molest female slaves and this (claim) is an everlasting catastrophe. Not even two Muslim scholars have ever disagreed that adultery is forbidden to both free and slave women and the punishment of an adulterer to either is the same. For this and other reasons, this interpretation should not be accepted after having the clear words of Allah’s Messenger (P). Therefore, the words of no one should be accepted unless it is (correctly) quoted from Allah’s Messenger.” (al-Muhallah, vol. 2 pp. 248-249). II. The above interpretation of the Ayah is contrary to some Shi’a and Sunni narrations which indicate Hijab was obligatory on all women whether free or slave. For example, ‘Ayesha; one of the wives of the Prophet (P), narrated that the Prophet (P) came to her and one of her female slaves (whose hair was uncovered) hid herself. The Prophet (P) asked ‘Ayesha if she had reached the age of puberty? She said, yes. Then the Prophet (P) tore a piece of his turban and said to her: Cover your hair with this. إختَمِری بهذا (Ibn Majah, vol. 1 p.517) Another example can be sited from the history of the battle of Camel. Umm Kulthum; the daughter of Imam Ali (a.s) goes to visit other ladies alerting them about the mischief-makers. Sh. Mufid (r.a) narrated: “She accompanied her female slaves whilst there were all fully and modestly dressed [مُتَخَفِّرات].” (Al-Kāfe’a, p. 17) III. The fabricators of the above interpretation have forgotten that ‘not all free women were believers, nor all female slaves were disbelievers! Some female slaves were believers whilst others were not. Therefore, according to the Ayah, the believing female slaves had to wear cloaks (because they were believers), but according to that interpretation they should not have worn it (otherwise they would have been mistaken with free women!) IV. Take a moment and picture an image of a rapist. Without doubt, you are thinking of a man! Perpetrators of sexual violence are almost always men. Statistics beyond doubt show that females are by far more vulnerable than men on sexual assault and hence. “One in five women and one in 71 men will be raped at some point in their lives in the USA.” According to the same report, 91% of victims of rape and sexual assault are female, and 9% are male. (National Sexual Violence Resource Center 2012-2015) Therefore, females need more protection. They need to protect themselves by the way they dress and interact with the opposite sex. Simultaneously, there must be a strict law to prevent molestation and punish its perpetrators. Islam on the one hand has made Hijab, as a modest dress, mandatory on all women, and on the other hand ordered men to lower their gaze and also has announced a severe punishment for perpetrators of molestation. In Chapter 33 after commanding women to cover themselves with their cloaks, the Almighty Allah states: “Now, if the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is a disease and those who spread false rumours in Medina do not cease (from annoying others) We (Majestic Allah) will surely urge you (Muhammad) against them (to punish them), then they will not be your neighours in it except for a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever they are confronted and will be executed forcefully.” (33: 61-62) Unless the above laws are mandatory equally on all members of a society their sexual security will not achieved. V. On a final note, I believe there is a discrepancy between the dress code of female slaves for Salāt and their public dress code. According to authentic narrations [Wasae’lu-Shi’a, vol. 4, p.412] from the Imams of Ahlul-Bayt (p.b.u.t) there has been a leniency on their headscarf only when praying perhaps because they were new to Islam and Islamic practices. There is no evidence from the Qur’an or authentic Ahadith that any group of women were allowed to appear in public without appropriate Hijab. Answered by: Sheikh Mansour Leghaei

[@corpsefoot758]

Did either half of the Thaqalayn prescribe physical beatings for any violations of public hijab? If so, where?

[@Unknown-dp3qy]

@@corpsefoot758 if you mean Basiji Forces, they only confront with the ones who are Harming Iran's Safety, not the ones who do wear hijab. Everyday that I go out I see lots of Woman who aren't wearing Hijab and Literally no one has problem with them, but as you may not know, the Western Medias are Showing the opposite thing!

[@ZwaneMakki]

Oh Allah curse the filthy khomeini and Khamenei and Rais perverts and burn them in the hellfire for murdering little girls. Burn them and whip them daily and every night Allah. Destroy the iranian Qom nazi-aryan hypocrites and their satanic followers. #AMEEN

[@sayyidyousafkazmi]

There are two concepts of punishments in Islamic law. 1. Hudood- Fixed/Prescribed punishments. There are few offences which carry a prescribed punishment. 2. Ta'zir - Punishments determined by judge/jurist/government. Most of the offences are dealt under this head. Any obscenity falling short of Hadd is dealt under this catagory. The punishment may vary on case to case basis. Even traffic offences would be dealt under the concept of Ta'zir. This allows Islam to develop and progress with time and changing circumstances. When it comes to Hijab, public hijab is a universal concept though it's conception varies and so does the punishment. So, any person who defies and challenges the Hijab publicaly, he is punished in every other state, not just in an Islamic state. 👇 Each and every state specifies the 'amount of body concealment' (Hijab). Even in Western countries, it is necessary to cover at least some parts of the body in public, otherwise you get punished. In Islam, the Holy Qur'an has directly prescribed the 'amount of body concealment' (Hijab). You cannot change this limit at your own will, even if you wish to. States primarily based on Islam have no option but to specify public Hijab (amount of body concealment) as per Holy Quran. So, permission cannot be granted to come out publicaly without covering that specified limit. In this, no special clothes are imposed by force, but it is being said that this amount of body should be covered in public places. In an Islamic state, an open, collective and/or public commission of sinful activities is not allowed. This was also the case in intital days of Islam. For example, sinful gatherings etc. were not not allowed. If someone doesn't do Hijab ('cover the specified amount of body) in homes and/or private space, Islamic government won't interfere since that's an individual & private matter. However, this cannot be allowed in public places, since that's a collective and public matter. Things will become evident and clear if you get to comprehend this difference. Otherwise, you will continue to suffer from the problem 'lack of recognition' and keep on confusing the distinct dimensions. > Ayatollah Khamenei has replied to this issue on similar lines (facebook.com/100010526773198/videos/1258796151625327/)

[@corpsefoot758]

Where is it “prescribed” by the Ahlul Bayt or Quran that the punishment for “improper hijab” (and let’s remember, that means LOCKS OF HAIR being marginally misplaced) is public beatings? Be very clear in your citation. Not hearsay or third-party reference, but actual textual citation

[@oryxthetakenking8275]

@@corpsefoot758 Iran's government denies any beatings of Mahsa, and as a Shia, we have to take the word of another momin over the words of non-Muslims. And it's mainly non-Muslim people/agencies that claim she was beat, yet they themselves share no evidence.

[@corpsefoot758]

@@oryxthetakenking8275 No, as a Shi’a I defend ONLY the truth, and nothing else. Even if it’s spoken from an atheist mouth, a pagan mouth, a Sunni mouth, a Shi’a mouth etc. etc. Thank you for clarifying the massive difference between our worldviews, I now understand why Mahsa’s death is no big deal for you (and there are DOZENS more cases like hers at this point, but those don’t bother you either; you apparently just placed your blind trust in the nearest “Shi’a” government a long time ago 🙄)

[@RAY-uc7ye]

@@oryxthetakenking8275 The Iranian government has a track record of lying and concealing, so it's difficult to believe what they say and to potentially go against an innocent person who might have been mistreated by the government? Right is right, wrong is wrong, doesn't matter if it is a Shia mo'min or not. As not all Shia's are perfect unfortunately. Being Shia doesn't give immunity from mistreating others. Salaam.

[@bigabe23]

I never understand why the women went against the hijab but its very very very important for them to protect them from the lurking men.. Most people always fall in their sexual desire to check out. For example, look at America, all boyfriends played around with their girls then discard them like a paper. Listen, hijab is very beautiful to all girls. I always respect that and PLEASE remember do it for Allah. Allah test you. Be smart. Thanks for your lecture video, Sayed!

[@Amir_Ali_12]

34:09 You mean that Islam isn't inspiring anymore in Iran?

[@onlineclasses8222]

786 Au Québec le port de signes religieux est interdit dans plusieurs secteurs, hélas. C’est dommage que le clergé n’opte pas pour le juste milieu, ni pour un autre référendum en Iran. Mille mercis pour ce partage ! 🙏👌👍

[@MK-kf3vn]

Does Saudi Arabia enforce hijab?

[@oryxthetakenking8275]

not in the current day. 5 yrs ago, yes. I think it ended with MbS taking over

[@Unknown-dp3qy]

Saudi Arabia is actually disobeying Islam, Imagine the Heart of Islam is a Secular county right now

[@enigmabeta7893]

For me the question is not about Islam and the hijab. It’s clear that in the Quran it is a requirement. The question is do “religious police” have the authority to kill you if you choose not to wear it. I don’t recall the prophet having his dogs (religious police) going around beating women for not wearing hijab. Is there an episode that Imam Hussain slapped a women in the street because he did not like her style of hijab? Don’t confuse the two issues. It’s not about Islam it’s about the use of force to keep your own power. ayatollah khamenei should not follow the Sunnah of Yazid or copy shah of Iran. Islam was sold to us as being a caring protective religion. Where did it go wrong?

[@tigerizalive2821]

Foreigners have killed civilians in Iran to promote their agenda, just the way they started in Syria and now we see Isarel openly supporting ISIS and attacking Damascus. So this says the whole story!

[@enigmabeta7893]

@@tigerizalive2821 I didn’t understand your point. I’m talking about oppression of Muslim women by Muslim men. Were the religious police in Iran from Israel? Do you really believe that? Ali (as) said don’t argue with ignorant people. I trust his wisdom.

[@corpsefoot758]

Very well said. If the Ahlul Bayt never supported beating women for violating hijab, then I will simply follow their example as a Shi’a I don’t really care what type of stupidity Khamenei is trying to promote instead

[@hannibalbarca2792]

Mashallah Syed...stay strong In my opinion hijab means to dress modestly and the meaning of modesty should not be rigid. I don't think the practice of viel is some divine instruction which came from above...it was just a sign of modesty back then....the viel was also present nonmuslim societies all over the world at some point of time. e.g. Slavery was legal is Islam, but slavery was already present in the Arab society when the Prophet came along and abolishing slavery abruptly in that society would have created ultimate chaos....but Islam did encouraged muslims to free slaves and treat them well...which was revolutionary compared to other societies at that point of time. So does that mean slavery should be legal in today's time as well...absolutely Not So, We should start focusing on the principles of our religion rather than clinging to rules which are several centuries old and can/should change with time and circumstances. I am not suggesting we should go down the path of the west where everything is going to hell in the name of freedom of choice. There should always be rules and restriction in a society but those rules should not be rigid but rather open to intellectual discourse.

[@sereneibrahim2596]

An approach which is truly admirable.

[@ayvesshekh1313]

I think there must be some issues discussed more in detail to clearify further conclusions. 1. Do Shia Muslims need Sharia (where they are significant majority). Is Sharia better than secularism. 2. There should be a clear description of a Sharia based society and most importantly an ideal Sharia law to be governed with. 3. At what extend Sharia law are to be interfered in the population. How much power and authority does the administer of an Islamic society hold? 4. If any ruling is not distinctly mentioned in Hadith or Quran so obviously Faqihs have to do ijtehad to sort the most suitable Islamic instruction. Like if hijab's 'hadh' is not found and you don't punish her because of it and leave it as an individual matter then how do any deal if someone naked is roaming around the streets. Lastly quoting hadith from Usul e Kafi: Narrated from Ahmad ibn Muhammad from Ali ibn al-Hakam from ‘Umar ibn Aban from abu ‘Abd Allah (Imam Jafar as-Sadiq) ‘Alayhi al-Salam, who has said the following: “The Messenger of Allah has said, ‘All good things are with the sword, under the shadow (protection) of sword and people cannot be improved without the sword. Swords are the key to paradise or hellfire.’” Grading: Allamah Baqir al-Majlisi: صحيح - Mir‘at al ‘Uqul Fi Sharh Akhbar Al al Rasul (8/320)

[@corpsefoot758]

Why do you people keep bringing up the idiotic unrelated scenario of “naked in the streets”? We’re talking about improper headscarves, genius. Stick to the topic at hand. Did ANY one of the Ahlul Bayt physically punish women for this “crime”?

[@ayvesshekh1313]

@@corpsefoot758 Dah, hijab already existed in the parts conquered by Arabs and which were inherited by the Caliphate of Ali. You have no idea of Fiqh, you didn't even saw the lecture thoroughly. His whole point was to reopen Ijtehad on this topic. Things that are explicitly not clear in Sunnah and Seerah then Ijtihad generates the closest ruling. If you are not okay with hijab law then plz answer me are you okay with ban of concerts, homosexuality, public dancing, female singing, alcohol, short cloths etc? Islam is a complete guide of every aspect of life. If today it's for hijab then later it will be for other sins and finally downfall of Islamic republic. I also don't support this and that is why I left believing in this religion of Arab dynastic cult "Mazhab e Ahl u l bait".

[@moaleali]

Do not forget that the government of Iran does not force the hijab, but considers the observance of the hijab in the public environment as a law like any other law. You can be naked in private environments!

[@fatemeh9664]

Ahsant

[@pooyanaghavi7554]

Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Revolution, claimed in numerous interviews and speeches before the 1979 establishment of the Islamic Republic that: "We want to act in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” In a speech on February 18, 1978, he said: "The Declaration of Human Rights - its headline - is the freedom of individuals. Every human being is free, he must be free. Everyone must be equal before the law. Everyone should be free ... to live, free in their jobs, free in their behavior.” In an interview with Russell Kerr, in November 1978, Khomeini stated: "The Islamic government is based on consideration for human rights. No other form of government has considered human rights as much as Islam. Freedom and democracy are present in Islamic law in its full sense." He added: "Islam guarantees all human rights and affairs." "Now, under the present government [of the Pahlavi monarchy] in Iran, freedom is neither for men nor for women; in Islam, it is for everyone." The founder of the Revolution also stated to Iranians living abroad, on October 30, 1978, that: "We want to act in accordance with the Declaration of Human Rights. We want to be free. We want independence in our country, we want freedom." But did the Islamic Republic act in accordance with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, as claimed by Ayatollah Khomeini? Did human rights prevail in Iran after the victory of the Islamic Revolution? Ayatollah Khomeini's Promises In his interviews with journalists, recorded speeches that were smuggled into Iran and meetings with leading international figures - especially in the two years immediately before the 1979 Revolution - Khomeini repeatedly emphasized the principles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and presented a picture of a future Iranian government built on human rights and freedoms per the Declaration. He strongly defended the rights of women, minorities, the right to equality, the right to self-determination, the rule of law and freedom of expression. So please research Completely and before 1979 Before the revolution, when Iran was ruled by a secular king Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, many Iranian women actively wore the hijab.

[@corpsefoot758]

I was with you until you brought up the idiot Shah, who also tortured political opponents with his “SAVAK” police I guess the poor Iranis will just be doomed beneath rule from various brands of dictatorship forever 🤷‍♂️

[@NarjisNaqvi]

There is no compulsion in religion. After hearing so many brothers views on women wearing hijab, maybe some womens views won't go amiss! I am a hijabi living in Britain with 2 daughters, Alhamdulillah wearing hijab. Was hijab forced upon me? No. If I forced my children to wear hijab would they have? Probably. I demonstrated its importance and they chose. They had a right to chose as do all women. Islam of force isn't Islam. Logical thought, reasoning, understanding and love is the way to practice any faith. If we don't do this we are failing. I say this as a lover of Iran. Syed-May Allah SWT protect you and all our Alims. Plurality of ideas is a strength not a weakness. Please may we stop this infighting and realise that with 1.7 billion of us we have real strength. Instead we divide and fall at every obstacle.

[@Siddiqa_h]

There is no compulsion in religion, the right direction is clearly distinguished from the wrong. Faith is an intensely personal issue and plainly each person should be allowed to find their own path in life…..

[@thecominglightofgood583]

Compulsion in religion hmmm. Yes but there is no justification going against a state on flimsy basis and creating anarchy. Regarding your saying one should find ones own path then sorry to say we are not playing any hide or seek here are we? The path already laid before us. Divorce your ego and follow that.

[@corpsefoot758]

@@thecominglightofgood583 “La Ikraha fid-Deen” is a direct command from the Quran. Now show me the Quranic evidence for all this stupidity you are spreading here “Going against a state” is what Sunnis warn us against, because they are married to the Khulafa system. Sounds like you’re part of the wrong sect

[@zainabmerali7830]

Thank you our sayyad you look amazing and this explanation is desperately needed may Allah strengthen you and your family to continue serving Islam and protect you Ameen

[@arctos333]

Stop thirsting over men on the internet and get a life. Go learn how to cook or something.

[@salmanchk]

Speaking rationale 👍

[@OrganizedMess0025]

Asalamu Alaikum Coming from the Al al Sunnah side of Islam, there is agreement with Shia scholars regarding the obligatory nature of the hijab by most ulema from Al al sunnah paradigm. And we agree that we should remind others of the virtues of upholding Islamic practices and values in our daily lives and to respectfully correct or at least teach those who may have their different failings in iman and practice. That said, vast majority of Muslims disagree that one who doesn’t necessarily uphold all the various practices or values of Islam should ever be allowed to suffer harm. And Mahsa Amini, regardless of her cause of death, suffered as a result of police brutality. An all too common characteristic of many countries in our world today, both Muslim and non-Muslim. It’s a political problem for the most part, but in both Saudi Arabia and Iran, it involves a religious discussion since those two nations are some of the only ones with a morality police force that enforce religious laws the same as political laws, sometimes even stricter than political laws. Questions like what are the bounds the police have to stay within of all countries and specifically for the morality police forces, should we even have those forces at all? And if you support a country enabling enforcement of the veil, then by basic logic and reasoning, do you allow a country to ban the wearing of the veil? You cannot support one while criticizing the other. It’s either all ok, and countries whether Islamic or not have the right to enforce or ban the wearing certain clothing, or it’s not, and countries of all types should allow the people living within it to do as they wish in their personal lives without facing harm from the governments. And I’m not disagreeing with the notion of how important the veil is as part of modesty; I disagree with countries dictating how people should live their lives and allow their own people to face harm even as part of not upholding what the state declares morality. Allah knows best and regardless of the actions of men, never forget Allah is Ar-Rahman Ar-Raheem. He’s the most beneficent, most merciful. To further add: Fines, having it on your record that you don’t adhere to certain laws are all within bounds since no one is physically harmed. But harming someone for not praying or not wearing the veil especially when they show religiosity in other ways but nonetheless harming people period is what’s unacceptable.

[@ZwaneMakki]

Oh Allah curse Abu Bakr Umar Aisha and Hafsa oh Allah burn them day and night for killing your prophet and Fatima. Oh Allah curse their lovers and followers and humiliate them and raise them with Aisha in the hellfire for fighting against Ali 36 after Hijra battle of Jamal. Ali only fights the kuffar as the sword of Allah. #Ameen

[@unconscioususa8903]

I see nothing wrong with legislate modesty , the problem as you hinted at is the physical abuse and the government not taking a stand to let it be known that it want be tolerated and those who do continue the abuse of its citizens will be held accountable. All other suggestions pertaining the right of the Iranian government is nonstarter as they continue to be the government elected by its people

[@avrilfatima160]

Why don't we understand that God himself said that there is no compulsion in religion then what is hijab....really maniac crazy mad people....

[@corpsefoot758]

People are more concerned with being pro-Khamenei than they are with following the actual Ahlul Bayt We live in a cartoon world

[@eramzehra7093]

Great lecture. Thanks for talking about these. Societies regress when they put a lid on issues. Open debate, facing the change and evolution is important to let Societies progress.

[@sabasabreen5621]

Looking forward for next lecture. The lectures are certainly going to widen perceptions.

[@yaganasyed7627]

Thank you so much for this series, we all really needed it. I am so glad, someone from the scholars community has finally chosen to address this issue of forced hijab. Cannot wait for the upcoming sessions. God bless you Dr. Nakshwani.

[@alimoeed2577]

MashaAllah my brother. My life changed to good since I started listening to you. Keep up the good work. Ali from London uk

[@abbasmurtaza110]

I think Mr scholar is talking Islam from islamicate e.g women in Pakistan in Iraq in Lebanon etc they aren't anything for Deen we take our religion From Quran and Ahlulbayt AS. Not from Tom Dick and Harry.

[@corpsefoot758]

Oh really?? Where did the Ahlul Bayt promote physical punishment for violating hijab, genius? 😂

[@Islamic_video_27]

hey syed how much mi6 paid for this video??

[@user-yi4kj8vc3t]

To equate Pakistan, Taliban and Brunei as Islamic states on par with Iran is a disingenuous assumption to distort reality. Can you give one example for any women in Iran who received 74 lashes for non compliance of hijab??? I have seen so many pictures even in peaceful times where Iranian women are walking around with no proper hijab!!! So you think you have more knowledge then Ayt khamanai you think he doesn't know these half baked arguments of yours??? Why didn't you mention hijab used to be ripped off women's heads when Iranian Monarchy was in power?!? So you want to justify non hijab because non Muslims countries might force non hijab??? So tell us why are Muslim children in U.K. being taught homosexuality in primary schools??? Is that not forced and parents have no choice even if it contradicts fundamental values of Islam, Christianity and Judaism???? Why haven't you addressed this issue which is forced upon Muslims??? But you jump on forced hijab in Iran because you won't receive backlash......

[@corpsefoot758]

Are you denying that morality-police in Iran physically strike women for improper hijab?

[@user-yi4kj8vc3t]

@@corpsefoot758 I left so many questions answer those first.

[@corpsefoot758]

@Bahrom Olimov Show me any proof in the Quran or Hadith to support these punishments you just supported Unless you believe Khamenei knows better than our Prophet himself?

[@fakhrunnisaversi5796]

Asalamun Alaikum Sayed You look great,composed and believe me always waiting for your lecture be it Thursdays, Khushiali or Muharram I have stopped listening to any other scholar's lecturer Yes you have come through a lot of criticism, hit by the same people who once claimed to be your fans. This is life When imams were not spared who is Sayed Nakshwani.? However our Duas are with you, keep the good work you are doing an excellent work and this cannot be digested by others so they must slander you.This is life they wash away your sins.so let the barking dogs bark May Allah alivate you to higher level inshallah and you continue your good work With lots and lots of Duas🤲

[@dina_ganzheitlich_gesund83]

May Allah swt bless and reward you Sayyed! ✨🤲🏻✨you really enrich our lives

[@hawraabbas2195]

But why women in the KSA are forced to cover their faces for years now but would never do like what iranian women did in public if we are speaking of forced laws they just simply followed the law but why is it hard for the women in Iran to follow the laws? considering the country is majority muslim ..?

[@corpsefoot758]

It’s a matter of time in Saudi as well. Or did you already forget the country’s most recent stance on female driving? By the way, you are distracting from the core issue: WHY are women in Iran beaten for improper hijab, if the Ahlul Bayt never promoted this?

[@rachoner]

Iran regulated Hijab. Go to Iraq shrine cities without hijab, what would happen ?

[@clementhaa]

Sayed ammar u are a great man may allah give u a good long life with ur family. These lectures help everyone all around the world more than u know. as salamu alaikum from turkey

[@fakhrunnisaversi5796]

Asalamun alaikum Fully agree You are a person who really know the present times and address issues concerning what we are going through in the world today

[@user-yi4kj8vc3t]

Your too predictable Mr Ammar Nakshwani anyone with foresight can see right through you. You should of chosen showbusiness as a career, but here you are defiling Mimbar e Imam Hussain a.s. instead. The list of your very apparent un Islamic behaviour gets longer each day. How many more lies are you going to tell from Mimbar e Imam Hussain a.s. ???

[@corpsefoot758]

Did the Ahlul Bayt ever promote physical punishment for women who violate hijab?

[@user-yi4kj8vc3t]

@@corpsefoot758 I left so many question marks answer those first.

[@taslimkhataw340]

AsSalaam Alaikum Sayed Bless you, always in Duas. 🤲 JAZAKALLAH for all your efforts.🤲

[@user-el4ht2qd1f]

اللہ اکبر خامنہ ای رہبر

[@rizvisyedjaleel8396]

❤✌

[@aliabu-talib332]

I wonder would any one of the Holy Imams call these women who refuse the order of Allah concerning dress, as their Shia.

[@Funnyvidsfun]

Seriously wonder what you would have done at the time of imam Hussain 50 years from the time of prophet SAAW community has changed just because 60 years back model responsibility towards a duty of Islam....

[@fahadalam8322]

Yaaa zuljana madad.. may the pinky toe of abbas aloihisshalom bless you ..owe sayyaaadd ...yow owli madad

[@azataliking8302]

Every Country Have a Law if you don't follow those Certain Laws you will be Punished. I live in America and if you sleep with a girl under 18 and even she wanted to sleep with you and since your not under 18 and over it 18 you will spend 10-20 yrs in Jail. There is 100's of laws this is one example. So every country have a law. You living in Muslim country and society you have to follow these laws such as no alcohol, no drugs, no nightclubs and nude night clubs, no gay and lesbian LGBT clubs. Respect the laws or you will be punishment. We have to give Iran government so much credit for this and Allah Protect them. Iran have enemies all around they would love to destroy Islamic Iran because Iran is a great example around the Muslim world. There is no Movie in Iran without women covered up. Look at all the other Muslim countries all their movies women show their breasts, ass, legs, body, every part. Is this what Allah sent prophets for so we follow some parts of Quran and not follow the rest. The west been trying so hard for the last 40 or 50 yrs to get rid of Islamic Hijab and Islamic identity which is the Hijab. Hijab protects women less rape, harrasment, less cheating on your wife, there are so many benefits of Hijab.

[@g-onlinetv7114]

With all respect Sayyid you're among the people that I respect and always listening to thier lectures, but on this matter actually I'm not agree with your opinion at all, like me we are Shia Muslim, living in the Country that not observe Islamic Shari'a law, there's some certain laws it's not Islamic or our culture, it's just created by some people and force us to abide by it (those laws) and forcefully we accept so that to leave in peace, some law it's against Islamic law... How can you against the Islamic law in the Islamic Country ruling by Islam? Actually I'm not agree with your opinion Sayyid, and you need to review this opinion again.

[@corpsefoot758]

There is no evidence Khamenei enforces “Islam” in Iran. The only true Islam is the Thaqalayn, and they NEVER once promoted physical punishments for improper hijab. So Khamenei’s “Islamic” laws there are simply Bid’a, the same innovations we condemn Sunnis for spreading. So it’s actually YOU who “needs to review” whether being pro-Khamenei is more important to you than being a real Shi’a If Khamenei wants to admit he’s making up his own rules as he goes, then that’s fine! Go ahead and admit it. But stop trying to drag the Ahlul Bayt into this mess already, because they would never behave like this clown currently in charge Imam Ali’s legendary letter to Malik is proof enough of that fact

[@aliabu-talib332]

Believing that what is good for the goose must be good for the rat is not reasonable at all. The goose can be allowed to raise her young on our pond. Not so much, the rat. The Islamic Revolution is being besieged from without and within. It is a theocentric society and a theocratic state. The issue of forced Hijab has been discussed.in the Islamic Republic, and the laws are consequently rarely enforced. The women of The Islamic Republic wear Khimar and Jilbab in various degrees of severity. A whole bunch of these protesters have never worn it properly, and have never been jailed or even given a ticket. The issue here is not just hijab. .It not even a modernist issue, either. The real issue is Theo-centristic mores (social norms) vs. liberal secular mores (social norms). The secular liberal powers are in the business of enshrining what Good Faithful Practicing Muslims (Christians and Jews) consider depraved sexual mores. Islamic revolutionaries are radically against their incursion on our principles, and values. So they cannot water their fat pet rats at our goose's water hole. Dig it. Now if they think that it is therefore logical to force our people not to wear Hijab under pain of being jailed... I say we should fill the jails with our people until these governments practice what they preach. If not, you can keep your hypocritical state. The earth is spacious and filled with bounty,

[@fahadalam8322]

Ya abo Lolo madad

[@noornoorani3506]

I think he's missing the point, What happened in Iran was strictly a law enforcement issue. Maybe the law is disliked, but its still the law of the land

[@corpsefoot758]

Color segregation used to be America’s law of the land. Public drunkenness was Yazid’s law of the land! What a terrible defense you just tried to cobble together for Khamenei and his girl-beaters

[@curiouscognic1600]

@@corpsefoot758 Public drunkenness was not Yazids public order. Allahs laana be upon him but that is not true, he just drank whilst neglecting islamic law Regarding the US example you pointed at: Western countries like France and the US are secular states. When secular states prohibit hijab they are discriminating against a minority. When the US as a secular state had the racial laws they discriminated against part of the population Iran is not claiming to be secular nor is it secular. It is an islamic state, when they make Hijab obligatory they aren’t discriminating against anyone. Everyone are to wear it regardless of background, ethnicity or religion. Your examples are not correctly presented nor are they fare. It is mandatory in Islam to wear the hijab May I ask you, where so we establish “forbidding evil and doing good”, one of the tenets of Shia Islam, if not in dar al-Islam (islamic state). Lets presume we remove the hijab law, where does the ethical and moral boundary go? Do we eventually permit bikinis? Do we enjoy good and forbid evil? Or does secular tolerance have a precedence over Amr bil Marouf wa nahi an al monkar?

[@corpsefoot758]

@@curiouscognic1600 Ok then: Muawiya’s cursing of the Ahlul Bayt was public order. He used to torture and/or kill lovers of Imam Ali during his government tenure. It’s still a BS law As for Iran supposedly being an “Islamic” country, where is the proof of that? Would an “Islamic” country shield child molesters like Saeed Toosi? Would they open fire on civilian protesters, or kill children as young as Kian Parfalak? Imam Ali had no bodyguards even as the ruler, which is why Ibn Muljim was able to reach him at the masjid. So then why does Khamenei hide inside his house behind his bodyguards, when he could be out walking amongst the people like the Imams did instead? I thought he was the “representative of Imam Mahdi”?? 🙄 Simple answer: because Iran is not an “Islamic state”, and has nothing to do with the Ahlul Bayt whatsoever. Unless you can show me a SINGLE example of our Ahlul Bayt enforcing hair-covering with imprisonment and/or beatings?

[@curiouscognic1600]

@@corpsefoot758 Imam Mahdi will have Mikael and Jibril guarding him, so by your standards he is then a coward because he is not like imam Ali who did not have guards? Times change, the lesson has been learnt. In Sweden, swedish prime ministers didn’t have bodyguards until Olof Palme was shot dead by an assassin during the cold war. The Prophet tells us to trust Allah but at the same time to tie our camels, a metaphor for acting before a calamity befalls - same goes with Imam Khamenei, he is a target. The US and the usurper regime is openly assassinating people within Iran, read about Mohsen Fakhirzade, an Iranian scientist assassinated by Mossad (Israeli intelligence services) As for Muawiya cursing imam Ali, his cursing was kufr and did not have any ground in the Quran or sunnah of the prophet and his household. Islamic governance does have a firm ground in the Qur’an and the sunnah of the Prophet and his household. Again akhi, your comparisons are not equally grounded and are illogical.

[@curiouscognic1600]

@@corpsefoot758 Imam Ali had a hisbah by the way, a patrol watching the markets and society and upholding morality. This is not an innovation, even the Qur’an in sura nine forbids people from being naked during the time of the prophet.

[@alexxcostello]

Having open intellectual dialogue is part of Islam and we should never shy away from it because Satan will use those issues to crack the unity of the Muslims. In the holy Quran, God tells us to reflect. This is the basis of our religion. ❤

[@Hehehe-6261]

SYED AMMAR ON TOP>>>>>> COME TO AUSTRALIA UR THE BEST SCHOOLAR EVER BRO

[@stopvision8513]

What u want they should go back in the past ....? Be the same what they were

[@onlineclasses8222]

786 Les Alaouites et les Nizaris ne sont pas forcées de porter le voile.

[@curiouscognic1600]

Regarding the western example you pointed at: Western countries like France are secular states. When secular states prohibit hijab they are discriminating against a minority, a particular group within society. Iran is not claiming to be secular nor is it secular. It is an islamic state, when they make Hijab obligatory they aren’t discriminating against anyone. Everyone are to wear it regardless of background, ethnicity or religion. Your examples are not correctly presented nor are they fare. It is mandatory in Islam to wear the hijab May I ask you, where do we establish “forbidding evil and doing good”, one of the tenets of Shia Islam, if not in dar al-Islam (islamic state). Lets presume we remove the hijab law, where does the ethical and moral boundary go? Do we eventually permit bikinis? Do we enjoy good and forbid evil? Or does secular tolerance have a precedence over Amr bil Marouf wa nahi an al monkar?

[@mohammedhassanakbari6722]

Since when did the Clerical Establishment have the authority to Establish an Islamic State?

[@sygalib]

Exactly brother you are right

[@curiouscognic1600]

@@mohammedhassanakbari6722 since amr bil marouf and nahi an al monkar was one of the furu al-deen in Shia Islam. Open your eyes Even the west is waking up to the degeneracy spread by everyone being tolerant. It’s a matter of time until every muslim man is a deyoth

[@mohammedhassanakbari6722]

@@curiouscognic1600 The question is when did I advocate or condone Degeneracy?

[@curiouscognic1600]

@@mohammedhassanakbari6722 Did I say you condone it? Read again and read better.

[@mohlleal]

Mr. Nakshawani you know you are not a Marja or Ayatullah and you have no qualification on the Islamic sharia but you keep trying your shaytanic art work to deviate the weak shia in to extremism against Islamic Republic of Iran .

[@mohlleal]

Remember the event in Karbala they fought for Hejab and Sala these are the pillars of shia let the grand Ayatullah such as Khomeini or Sistani speak whats right or wrong not you who is no one .

[@corpsefoot758]

May Allah bless Sayed Ammar for tackling such a necessary but contentious topic. ANY government which claims to “represent” our blessed Ma’sumeen MUST uphold the standards of that same Ahlul Bayt, enshrined in such places as Imam Ali’s letter to Malik. And yet what we see right now in Iran is … civilians getting murdered by government employees, unbelievable economic strain, and an overall ego from their dictator so embarrassingly against our beloved Ahlul Bayt & their message that I am surprised this Khamenei doesn’t throw himself down at the feet of his own people and beg for their forgiveness EVERY crime shall be accounted for on the day of Qiyamah, and Allah does not forget anything.

[@mrs8768]

lets not slander sayed khamenei and accuse him of ego. We are not worth a single speck of dust under his feet.

[@corpsefoot758]

@@mrs8768 Prove it. Explain to me how he’s special, in clear & provable detail To me he’s a less-educated cult leader who got out of hand. Not to mention the random way in which Iran dealt with Golpaygani, Ayatollah Montazeri etc. even though their scholarly status outranked his. And so on & so forth When I watch Khamenei, I don’t feel anything close to what I feel towards the Ahlul Bayt, their companions, or even their students. And yet you’re speaking here like he’s some kind of 15th Ma’soom? Please save your deen before it’s too late, brother; there is no correcting your mistakes on Qiyamah

[@oryxthetakenking8275]

economic strain is from US, UK, and co who put horrible sanctions on Iran for not bowing to US and Israel. Blaming Iran for the economy being bad is utterly dumb. And Islam has strict laws, so idk what you mean. Iran only seeks to execute those rebels who started the bloodshed and burned buildings and cars. People don't realise how strict Imam Mahdi AS's reign will be, and how so many so called "Shias" will be executed by him when he returns.

[@corpsefoot758]

@@oryxthetakenking8275 1) The Prophet signed treaties with literal pagans, so there is Islamic precedent for a much more evenhanded approach than the tack chickenhawks like Khamenei try to take 2) Islam does not enforce those “strict laws” in the way these chimps in Iran are operating. Show me a SINGLE example of any Ma’soom beating a girl for wearing no covering on her head, and be very specific with your literary citation 3) Where is your proof Imam Mahdi’s executions will mirror all the killings committed by Basij forces etc.? Are you willing to gamble your ENTIRE Akhirah on this hypothetical universe in which Khamenei’s actions today mirror the Imam’s reign tomorrow? Show some humility. Khamenei wasn’t even the most educated scholar of his time, let alone this pathetic 15th Infallible you’re trying to paint him as Someone like Sayed Ali Qadhi was a hundred times the believer Khamenei will ever be. Learn from the superiors

[@user-gf9iy6yq7o]

@@corpsefoot758 His knowledge alone is worth our respect. If you have something else to present then by all means go ahead and present it. I’m no follower of his teachings but I wouldn’t dare question his knowledge of Islam. I’m as ignorant as you are compared to him. Stay humble and let those who know lead us forward.

[@aijaz619]

I'm Unsubscribing here.

[@corpsefoot758]

Goodbye, innovator The Ahlul Bayt never promoted physical beatings against improper hijab. I follow the Thaqalayn, you can go follow Khamenei instead

[@farhaanrizvivlogs5193]

Dear Mr. Nakshawani, I would request you to watch a podcast hosted by Sabeel Media on KZbin where they supported Iran's forced hijab policy and the morality police. The podcast is in urdu but the aforesaid group has a great influence on Indian shia muslims which is the largest shia population in the world. Furthermore, opposite views on Iran's current situation is disturbing since majority of the Maulana's study from Iran. Therefore, I would request you to have dialogues or comment or make a reply video on their views. Regards,

[@mimimiraj7351]

Salaam....hijab is similar to wearing a wedding band....an outer symbol of an inner grace....

[@shha1417]

#freeiran

[@shukeelc5177]

From what?

[@zgheibali9118]

Exaxtly from what!!! I live in europe and i regret being free:))) soo as an engineer i will be free sleping on the streets:)))) my gov pay 500€ per ukraine citizen and my daughter gets from my gov 100€ per month,i m soooo free:))))))))

[@corpsefoot758]

@@shukeelc5177 From suffering: at the hands of the Shah, of Khamenei, of bloodthirsty foreign governments etc. etc. Iran’s people have suffered enough

[@zgheibali9118]

@@corpsefoot758 bro what the hell are you speaking about? Tell me more about those atrocity of khamenei please

[@Jamess3900]

#Troll

[@zond7290]

Imam Khamenei is the just leader of the Muslim Ummah. The Iranian nation is the pride of Islam in the world today. Anyone who condemns them is speaking nonsense.

[@zond7290]

@@zaydmaybe4075 How are we supposed to obey Imam al-Mehdi (ع) while he's in occultation? By obeying the scholars. And who's the greatest scholar of our time? Imam Khamenei (ق).

[@minecraft4444100]

@@zond7290 greatest scholar of our time?

[@RyuFan1999]

Lanat on any unjust government with blood on their hands, who claim to be the government of the Imam (ajtfs)

[@wafaabatooll]

ahsant!!! may Allah (swt) bless u

[@zond7290]

@@minecraft4444100 Is there any other scholar who leads an entire nation on the path of Islam against America and Israel? Does Sadiq Shirazi do that? Perhaps Ayatollah al-Sistani (q) led the Iraqis against ISIS, but he still doesn't command the power and respect of Imam Khamenei (q).

[@Funnyvidsfun]

He is mocking himself...what a waste of talent

[@Funnyvidsfun]

Next time don't recite Bibi zainab behijab as masaib

[@sardarhossieni4607]

How much is Britain paying you to speak so much about Iran.

[@juhifatima3031]

According to your speech the ayatollah of that time was wrong to imposed hijab or wht u called forced hijab ?? Ayatollah who is a connection between imam of our time and people was wrong …you knw better than ayatollah??? why did u choose this topic in these difficult times of our religion

[@ZwaneMakki]

Oh ALLAH the ALL Conqueror CURSE Khomeini and Khamenei and Raisi and throw these devils and their satanic 1979 devil cult into the hellfire with Aisha who they love and defend. #AMEEN

[@iReaper69]

When you choose to follow Islam you don't get to pick and choose according to your liking. If you think not wearing hijab is okay you are a dubious hypocrite.

[@mohammedhassanakbari6722]

But comitting violence to enforce it is not islamic

[@iReaper69]

@@mohammedhassanakbari6722 Call out the countries that ban hijab and use violence to make sure it isn't worn. Call a spade a spade. Don't target Iran just because your interests align with the West.

[@tsp320]

@@mohammedhassanakbari6722 there is no violence brother except from those foreign financed rioters who are brutally murdering innocent civilians and security personnel, burning looting buildings in the name of womens right and human rights.

[@mohammedhassanakbari6722]

@@tsp320 SO why this frustration in the 1st Place? - Lets Call a Spade a Spade & Acknowledge that the Regime made peoples lives Frustratingly miserable by its heavy handed & aggressive policies whose burden like indirect taxation is borne by the people. Also Most Iranians Associate with their National & cultural Identity as opposed to religion so you seriously need to stop talking here.

[@mohammedhassanakbari6722]

@@iReaper69 2 Wrongs don't make a right