Science Backs Churchill Hand In Bengal Famine Deaths

[@DreaminNirvana]

He IS RESPONSIBLE

[@andrejt8160]

Nah

[@shaskins15]

No hes not

[@AMAN-xg8ub]

He is

[@andrejt8160]

@@AMAN-xg8ub no lol

[@ukrainianbloke9676]

A bit, the Indian governments choice to burn all the railways in the region was the biggest contributor., (scorch earth tactics, like the Russians in ww2).

[@venkatramapuneeth6265]

And this guy got nobel

[@paromita10]

For Literature! Not peace !

[@venkatramapuneeth6265]

@@radking9854 one great work can't tally his entire life of crimes

[@venkatramapuneeth6265]

@@radking9854 killed millions of innocent indians. Left millions to starve during a famine ,so he could sell and supply to his army. When told about deaths in that famine , his reply was did gandhi die? Tell me only then

[@nayan7398]

@@radking9854 stfu

[@cadds8055]

@@venkatramapuneeth6265 listen man I’m Indian and I agree when you said he wasn’t good but he wasn’t the cause of it just alleviated the disaster further, he needed some of the ships for soldiers to help the war in Europe at the time

[@SureshSingh-ev2ki]

Bengal Famine and Bangladesh Separation (East Pakistan-1971) are two suppressed issues in Geopolitics. Bollywood does neither have the balls to produce films on these issues nor they have close to reality. I must say somebody from Hollywood should depict this at least in cinematic reality. I am enthusiastically waiting for someone will make a movie showing the truth of these two tragic histories...Thank You

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

Exactly Bollywood should tell the truth about how Hindus were the government of Bengal ruling over Muslims and didn't feed the Muslims and let them starve The Bengal Famine of 1942 was a severe food shortage crisis that occurred in India's Bengal during World War II. The famine was caused by a combination of factors, including drought, the diversion of food to the war effort, and the inability of the Indian government to provide adequate relief. Additionally, the Japanese Empire's occupation of Burma/Myanmar reduced the food supply in Bengal. Marwari traders hoarded grain, exacerbating the food shortage. Canadian Prime Minister McKenzie King offered to send grain to Bengal, but British Prime Minister Winston Churchill ordered that grain be shipped from Australia instead. The ultimate responsibility for the crisis was attributed to the India Bengal government assembly, which failed to provide adequate relief and support to the people of Bengal. The Bengal Legislative Assembly had the power to make laws on agriculture, trade, and commerce, which could have helped to address the food shortage. The Government of India Act 1935 decentralized the administration of food and agriculture to the provincial governments, including Bengal. Natural disasters such as crop disease and cyclones had severely affected Bengal's food production. The Indian Bengal government was mostly made up of Indians, mostly Hindus ruling over Muslims during the famine between 1940 and 1945. The Hindu-majority party in power in Bengal, the Krishak Praja Party, had discriminatory policies towards Muslims, who made up a significant portion of Bengal's population. This worsened the famine's impact on the Muslim population. The Bengal Legislative Assembly was dissolved on 11th November 1942 by the British colonial authorities in response to the Quit India Movement. Although the assembly was dissolved, Indians continued to play a role in governing Bengal. Indian political leaders organized protests, strikes, and other forms of civil disobedience to pressure the British colonial authorities to address the pressing issues facing Bengal, such as the food shortage and the need for greater political autonomy. The Bengal Famine was one of the deadliest famines in human history, with an estimated death toll of between 1.5 and 3 million people. The famine affected mostly the rural areas of Bengal, where the poorest and most vulnerable people lived. The British colonial government was criticized for not doing enough to address the crisis and for exacerbating the situation by continuing to export food from India to other parts of the British Empire. Despite the difficult circumstances, many Indian leaders and organizations played an active role in providing relief to the victims of the famine. Some of the notable leaders who played a role in the famine relief efforts include Sarat Chandra Bose, Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy, Khwaja Nazimuddin, Fazlul Haq, and A. K. Fazlul Huq. These leaders organized relief camps, distributed food, and raised awareness about the severity of the crisis. In conclusion, the Bengal Famine of 1942 was a tragic event in Indian history that resulted in the loss of millions of lives. While there were multiple factors that contributed to the crisis, the failure of the India Bengal government to take adequate measures to address the food shortage was a major factor. Despite this, Indian leaders and organizations worked tirelessly to provide relief to the victims of the famine and played an important role in mitigating the severity of the crisis.

[@babababi7911]

Bollywood is owned by punjabis and Sindhi hindus. Thats why most Bollywood film stories belongs to punjab

[@sonamc2932]

When we were younger our grand parents used to tell about stories of "Anikal" during which mothers used to boil stones and tell her children that the food is being prepared but when the children found out that it was stones only, they died. It was the only hope of the food that kept them alive. Just imagine the level of hunger those children were going through. Now I know "anikal" they used to talk about is this famine. In my place people eat himalayan nettle ( leaves which has little thorns in it) soup. And different types of roots that are found in forest. I suppose they started to eat all these things during that famine only (I personally feel so).

[@chigasakinanami9100]

same in uttrakhand, its good for join pain

[@newsjunkieish]

@@donkeydesiamericanprofessor Yes, but the massive level of deaths due to starvation never happened again. That's the difference between parasitic colonial rule and self-rule.

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

@@newsjunkieish 93% of the death during the Bengal family were due to disease not from starvation. You don't know what you're talking about. And it's the British famine relief efforts that the Indian government continued that prevented for their family relief even though there were other famous after 1947 just not to the severity

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

My father was a prisoner of war worker during world war II and they would boil stones and eat them so that they wouldn't have hunger pains they were eating rocks, nothing different between Germany and India. Except that India is responsible not managing an eradicating famine in Bengal

[@newsjunkieish]

@@donkeydesiamericanprofessor The thing is you are claiming to be a Desi, an American, a German, I don't know what to believe. I know what India as a whole and Bengalis in particular went through under British rule. I don't need an upstart on the Internet to tell me about it. Your father didn't die from eating boiled stones, good for him.

[@jyotibarman3099]

Can't believe people are capable of such horrific doings.. and live like nothing has happened. Such a shame

[@bagwankshindouchbag3615]

Talk about your caste system and deva dassi

[@jyotibarman3099]

@@bagwankshindouchbag3615 of course we are dealing with the flaws of our religion & our country and trying to become what a decent society should be, unlike you, who doesn't even want to know about their flaws.

[@dhrupadsah9215]

@@bagwankshindouchbag3615 talk about your racial discrimination and witch hunting chomu

[@jyotibarman3099]

Dude... Just read my previous reply carefully.

[@dhrupadsah9215]

@@jyotibarman3099 didi muje pata hai aap nai kya likha hai par highlight karne ke liye tho inko pata chale aap kiski bat kar rahe hai

[@mursalinkhan5126]

हिंदूस्तान अंग्रेजो की इस क्रूरता को हमेशा याद रखेगा ।

[@goodguyyt]

You indian

[@moemoe7082]

@@goodguyyt India and bengal was under control of British

[@RahulKumar-bu8st]

@@goodguyyt that's matter ??

[@goodguyyt]

@@RahulKumar-bu8st doesn't it do?

[@ashokn32]

@@goodguyyt bhag idhar se bc

[@myblueandme]

Thank you for making this and keeping the Truth. Please use uninvolved music background to honour the deaths.

[@jamesmoylan2861]

There was food in India grain hoarders had it and put the price up.

[@smh2431]

@@jamesmoylan2861 just stfu

[@jamesmoylan2861]

@Bill Slim thanks I simply put what was promised to the troops 3 weeks after D-Day and why ,to prevent fascism(which is really just mafia with the us Constitution ignored and International law ignored for the benefit of 1 tyrant)and of course world war.

[@rishav_killerx6011]

@@jamesmoylan2861 nice Conspiracy you can't Brainwash others

[@jamesmoylan2861]

@@rishav_killerx6011 Luckily for me it's not my opinion. It's the opinion of all major world leaders and parliaments except Hitler and Stalin And president Obama Putin and Xiao xi Ping. And any one who can see further than the next bit of cash for themselves. If X sees Y buying anthrax Novichok bombs etc on the dark web with crypto, should X cash in,the more dead the bigger the profits on $7TN a day FX or ring Interpol? Professor Kailash Chand RIP ❤️this question. Please discuss,and criticise,my comments he❤️on his Twitter feed. ☮️

[@redstarfarms2778]

Never heard this in school, I'm 24, and learned of this through r/communism. But never heard the end of Stalin's famine, which the more i look into it the more it doesn't make sense

[@cghygyy]

COMMIE SWINE OFF OUR STREETS

[@charananekibalijaun8837]

@@The-Great-Brindian kzbin.info/www/bejne/j16lhYR_f5yDfLs You're welcome, bhai. You might learn something today.

[@OoooAMDG]

Communist using reddit (made by CAPTALISTS)

[@gottod6895]

@@OoooAMDG Which must be public space.

[@dexorne9753]

@@OoooAMDG your name reveals that you're brain-dead, and your opinion does not matter outside of cars and probably "football"

[@rootical2331]

Don't trust anybody in power

[@bagwankshindouchbag3615]

Especially mouldi modi

[@jamesmoylan2861]

Unless they support the American constitution and promises to the troops 3 weeks after D-Day for stabilization of world currencies as a foundation for a lasting peace. Listen to Eisenhower Roosevelt Truman and the Kennedys and respect the international cooperation in the United Nations cooperation machine to prevent world war , pandemic and global warming pollution. I would suggest. Furthermore if Boris walks over International law for his master's in the billionaire taxation without representation cash collection Forex machine wave Bretton Woods and the us Constitution article 1 section 8 in his face please for the good of world peace and the defeat of tyranny for which do many us soldiers lay down their lives in ww2. Though some mock their sacrifice.

[@gamesmackdown1571]

@@bagwankshindouchbag3615 and stale Margaret pizza

[@scgamerchannel1276]

@@gamesmackdown1571 Lmao

[@marcusbrownly5509]

I don't see any hero on this ww2 fight, just giant powers fighting recklessly to over through each other and in the middle my bangali people dying a horrible death. Just like so many other innocent souls. Nor Church Hill nor Hitler I cheer for. They were fighting for their people and land. And I still see people choosing one of them. One of their total win would have send us back to slavery. Thank god for no one of them could win a total victory by themselves. We even got freedom. But at what cost?

[@jaibhavani6454]

You said the truth man, it was their greed for colonies which caused the war

[@MuhammadIqbal-xe1yv]

Well said bro. I actually also think the same.

[@spacecowboy5274]

Britian had a total win,it didnt send the world to slavery? Britian had abolished slavery long time before world war

[@newsjunkieish]

We should thank the Americans also for joining War effort late in the day and allowing Germany and Great Britain to nearly destroy each other. This decimated the old imperial master Britain and created new superpowers, the USA and USSR. That in turn led to the Cold War Era. So, it literally is a case of ants being squashed in the wrestling of giants.

[@evanwilliamson3602]

From a British man, I hold Churchill responsible. How can a man maintain such obesity when the country that he oversees perishes to shit? Wake up guys. Take off your Empire glasses for a second.

[@sharadjain2463]

This western channel is glorifying him Prager U kzbin.info/www/bejne/mpu6ZGl5aNmSmrM

[@sharadjain2463]

Hollywood always glorify Prager u

[@thomaskennedy5728]

@FIGHTFANNERD10 cant blame victims. Indians were sufficient to take care of themselves before Europeans came. Indian region had 24% part in World economy that time and after European it was below 2%

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

Why don't you go learn about the Bengal famine

[@AzureImperialism]

​@@thomaskennedy5728 Look at the GDP per capita, please. It was super low. India only held 25 percent of the world's economy because it also held 25 percent of the world's population.

[@havock89]

This is contradictory... the cause of the famine was a flood not a drought.. what are these peope talking about? The text claims that churchhill said a drought caused it but science underminds that idea by saying there was not a shortage of rainfall, however the news articles cites a flood, which would also destroy crops...?

[@seanprice7980]

He was evil

[@uppitywhiteman6797]

He saved Britains ass or they would be speaking German.

[@Regular93]

@Don Fisher Churchill was a man that faced the one the greatest military powers in history . A country that conquared France in a matter of weeks , the thing that made Churchill a great man was that he was stubborn , his country faced a country that had overwhelming numbers of tanks , men and planes , even when the threat of invasion looming, and the threat of being cut off of supplies because of the u boat menace , he and his people will never surrender.

[@Utiaux]

@Peter Lustig what Americans suddenly appeared out of nowhere to win us the battle of Brittan You know, a battle fought between an outnumbered RAF and NAZI FUCKING GERMANY despite the war looking as good as over, stopping us negotiating a deal with nazi Germany that would have allowed them to continue a one army attack against those very Russians who you say did all the work for us in saving us. now tell me where was russia or America in that battle? yeah exactly be grateful your not speaking german.

[@AvanRoyOfficial]

@Stephen LeftfieldUSSR single-handedly defeated Germany Britain was well shit

[@gordonculp8364]

@@Utiaux were speaking english because of the same sort of power. except britain was worse.

[@rodneymarsden3003]

Churchill has made mistakes. The Gallipoli mess during WW1 was down to him. Australians have not forgotten. Americans remember Churchill calling for an invasion of southern Italy in 1943 that led to many allied deaths. There was also the invasion of Norway by British soldiers that was also a disaster because it was so badly planned. The Bengal famine new to me but it does make sense. More lives lost. Churchill made decisions affecting the lives of millions and he wasn't always right.

[@Abhayji7531]

Biggest empire shrink to tiny island Karma hit back hard

[@srinivas6104]

@joe mama do you admit that the British Empire did many horrific things in India? I know that your school history is altered.

[@srinivas6104]

@joe mama good to know that mate. We only hate ignorant and arrogant brits. Our ancestors fought and sacrificed their lives for future generations. And future generations are us. That is why we are proud Indians. We can not tolerate anyone disrespecting them. And please don't discriminate our people. 🙏

[@cghygyy]

@@srinivas6104 Any sane person would acknowledge that the British empire did bad. I don't deny that at all. I respect India and your ambition, however accusing us of an intentional genocide in bad faith is not acceptable. WW2 was ongoing, Japanese submarines blockaded and sunk and supply ships delivering food, before that a typhoon destroyed the harvest in India, with Indian merchants bought up much of the remaining supplies. Churchill ordered over 300,000 tonnes of wheat & barley to India & got troops to move food from rich areas to poor areas. It's hardly like the video says. There's a full in-depth video here citing all historical sources: kzbin.info/www/bejne/j16lhYR_f5yDfLs&ab_channel=Settler%27sLament

[@amitakalanikalani5369]

@@cghygyy British empire is responsible for everything horrible happening in India . They taught Indians corruption , greed and divided the community and the country to strengthen their future .India was a land of extreme wealth and resources. Who took all those? Brits and never acknowledge colonies for extravagant buildings of london and south England. Colonizers all over the world thought that uncultivated land should be taken over so that that could be used for more commercial purposes. The production of commercial crops like jute, sugar, wheat and cotton increased during this period. This happened because of increasing demand from a growing population in Europe. Food-grain was required to feed the growing population and raw materials were needed for the growing industries. The cultivated area increased by 6.7 million hectares between 1880 and 1920 in India. Shipping Industry in England: The oak forests were disappearing in England by the early twentieth century. This created scarcity for the ship building industry in Britain. Ships were quite important for military power of the British. They found good source of wood for shipbuilding in the Indian forests. This resulted in large scale deforestation in the Indian forests. Railways: The spread of railways from the 1850s created new demand for timber. Timber was required for making sleepers for the railway line. Each mile of railway track needed 1,760 to 2,000 sleepers. About 25,500 km of track had been laid by 1890. You can calculate the number of sleepers needed to 25,500 km of railway line and number of trees which were chopped for this. Plantations The British also introduced large plantations for growing tea, coffee and rubber. European planters were given vast areas of land at cheap rates so that they could develop plantations. The area was cleared of forests to make way for tea or coffee plantations. To properly control and manage the forest resources in India, the British appointed a German expert, Dietrich Brandis, as the first Inspector General of Forests in India. Brandis introduced a new system and began to train people in conservation of forest resources. The Indian Forest Service was set up in 1864 and the Indian Forest Act was introduced in 1865. Grazing, felling of trees and any use of forest produce was made illegal and punishable offence. In the name of scientific forestry, they replaced natural vegetation with single type of trees like sal or eucalyptus. The modern conservationists tell this system as monoculture and argue that it is not good for the environment. The Indian Forest Act was amended twice, once in 1878 and then in 1927. The 1878 Act divided forests into three categories: reserved, protected and village forests. Now, people could not take anything from reserved forests. However, they could take forest produce from protected and village forests. Earlier, people used to take food, medicines, firewood and many other raw materials from forests. The new laws made their life miserable. They could no longer take their herds for grazing nor collect firewood. They were now forced to steal wood from the forests. But there always was the risk of being caught and harassed by the forest guards. Forest Rules and Cultivation Shifting cultivation has been prevalent among many tribal communities in India. This is a type of subsistence farming in which a small patch of land is cleared by slashing and burning the vegetation. Ash is then mixed with the soil and seeds are sown after the first rain of the monsoon. The patch of land is utilised for a couple of years and is then left fallow for 10 to 12 years. The colonial officials regarded this practice as harmful for the forests. They were afraid that an accidental fire could destroy valuable timber. Moreover, the shifting cultivators were difficult to control in revenue collection. The government hence banned shifting cultivation. This affected many families. Many people were forced to work in low paying jobs and some others were forced to migrate to cities in search of jobs. However, some people tried to resist the new laws through small and large rebellions.

[@amitakalanikalani5369]

@@cghygyy From the East India Company to the Raj, India was a British colony until the mid-20th century. And despite nostalgic imperialists extolling the virtues of the empire's rule, it left behind millions of victims. The 1919 Amritsar massacre, the grim anniversary of which India marked on Saturday, is one of the best-known examples of the atrocities committed by the British during their two-century colonial rule of India. But, numerically, its total of 1,600 victims looks like a small blot among the millions of deaths India suffered during the empire's prolonged misrule and exploitation. From the 18th to the 20th century, various parts of India endured over a dozen devastating famines, which killed tens of millions of people, most of the events exacerbated, if not outright caused, by the colonial administration. The East India Company (EIC), merchants with their own army who ruled India on behalf of the British crown, were ruthlessly effective in generating exports and profits from the colonized land - ruthlessness being a key part of the efficiency. Exports of Indian produce - rice, tea, wheat, and even, illegally, opium - were a vital boost for the British economy, helping keep food prices low at home and generating income from sales to other nations, like China.The EIC did not hesitate to decrease the areas for food crops and even destroy food plants to make room for other crops needed for export, including opium poppies. Many scholars agree that in a lot of the cases, famine would have come anyway, considering the poor rainfall and underdeveloped transportation, among other things - but it was made that much worse by the Brits, who exploited agriculture while failing to offset its troubles with proper investment. The British response to famine was often inaction, at least until their troops were affected, like in Orissa in 1865, where a third of the regional population died before aid was finally sent in. As the Great Famine of 1876-78 struck Madras and Bombay, the British administration thought the free market would sort it out and government interference would only hurt in the long run. It took 5.5 million deaths for the Brits to begin relief work. At the turn of the century, the British Viceroy cut rations (saying famine relief was "philanthropy" and "complacency"), which resulted in another million deaths.Partitioning of India The same ruling that brought India independence also resulted in one of, if not the worst instances of mass migration in history, a division of enormous territories along religious lines and a scar on both the land and the collective consciousness of two peoples - as well as over a million deaths and thousands of stories of atrocities and hardship which could have been avoided with better planning on the part of the retreating Brits.The British government decided to cede power to Indian leadership in 1946, but the initial plan was to keep the country whole - merely designating grouped provinces as majority Muslim and majority Hindu, to accommodate the deepening split between the country's two major religious groups, represented by the two largest political parties - the Muslim League and the Indian National Congress. That plan came crashing down when in August communal tensions boiled over into what is now known as the Great Calcutta Killings. The Muslim League staged a Direct Action Day, ostensibly a peaceful protest to demand a separate homeland for Muslims, which spiraled into a massacre of an estimated 4,000 people over the span of days. The British plan was then altered and accelerated - India would be split, Pakistan would be created, and independence would come several months earlier. The sometimes-voiced trope that the fate of the partition was decided over a single lunch is a bit of an embellishment - but several weeks of planning hardly proved a better time frame.The partition plan, with the border slashing through the mixed Hindu-Muslim regions of Punjab and Bengal, was presented in June 1947 by the last British viceroy, Louis Mountbatten, who did not see the need to organize an orderly transfer of populations, believing local authorities would sort it out as needed. What resulted was the uprooting of 15 million people and the deaths of over a million. Let loose by the officially announced religious divide, yesterday's neighbors began killing each other and taking away each other's homes and livelihoods, settling old feuds with blood and perpetrating localized ethnic cleansing. Afraid of becoming minorities in what used to be their own land, people fled in both directions across the border, as well as out of the regions altogether. Punjab and Bengal, as well as Sindh, Uttar Pradesh, and Kashmir (a disputed flashpoint to this day) were among the worst affected areas.

[@sundarjee3274]

The real face of British: During Bengal famine 1943, Churchill deliberately ordered the diversion of food from starving Indian civilians to well-supplied British soldiers and even to top up European stockpiles. Churchill even blamed Indians that they "breed like rabbits" The character of Indians: India provided Cuba with 10,000 tonnes of wheat and 10,000 tonnes of rice in 1992 when Cuba was undergoing hardship. Fidel Castro termed the donation as the "Bread of India", because it was sufficient to provide one loaf of bread to each Cuban citizen.

[@sharadjain2463]

And British try everything to defend their hero and british empire by their stupid logics

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

Are you confusing India with the Bengal region of india?

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

You think the Indians that exported rice and wheat from India weren't paid? They took the money instead of sending grain food surplus rice wheat to Muslim bengal

[@aaronb2779]

There was no diversion of food to India. That complete fantasy and incorrect. In fact Churchill sent huge amounts of aid to India once Whitehall realised how severe it was, despite the fact Britain has severe food rationing.

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

@@aaronb2779 Bengal Rice yield was 300 tons and they exported 100, but to be fair they also imported 75 tons of wheat from Burma. Churchill sent 750 tons of wheat from Ceylon Sri Lanka and Australia, 3 years of grain yield 3 years do I need to repeat myself

[@atlasatc]

My opinion of Winston Churchill is this: I don't like him, nor do I dislike him. he's neither evil nor good, but evil and good, he did commit. He's no better than Hitler, that's for sure.

[@leeshaumark]

No better than hitler?? A most agreeable statement until you said that. Don't be ridiculous.

[@cadds8055]

@@leeshaumark hitler commissioned a genocide against jews, churchill commissioned one against indians and was directly responsible for taking care of a country he had slaved over

[@leeshaumark]

@@cadds8055 be careful of your words "commissioned" is a rediculous one to use, to suggest churchills actions were pre-meditated such as hitlers borders on fantasy. This is no defence of them rather a defence of history and what actually happened, don't let your agenda change facts.

[@cadds8055]

@@leeshaumark this was premeditated by the fact of his outward views that were even considered quite blasphemy and extremist to his closest supporters

[@michaelmonaghan2717]

Equanimity, You had an objective reasonable statement until the end! That was asinine, and wrong!

[@janpiwowarczyk2858]

It was done same in Ireland.

[@mukeshjain01]

He was a demon killed so many can’t be counted bcz 3m was just a Britishers Counting just like Jallianwala 1300, no one can trust them,

[@shahzebshabbir9361]

Irish potato femine

[@travisbickle3835]

@@mukeshjain01 but it wasn't done by Churchill

[@mukeshjain01]

@@travisbickle3835 just search what he did in Bengal

[@anupamtiwari5587]

@@travisbickle3835 Yeah it wasn't as per the WHITE-washed history books. it wasn't......

[@victor256in]

@ 38 seconds: Churchill walking his dog Nehru

[@syphexlol]

U can just put 0:38

[@paruluniversity9739]

@@syphexlol ya even I din't knew that just clicking on 0:01 something like this youtube makes video at that time. I was shocked when I got to know 😂

[@justarandomguywithoutaname8719]

Hey i was not churchill's dog I was edwina's dog

[@victor256in]

@@justarandomguywithoutaname8719 Lol. Woof!

[@victor256in]

@@syphexlol i would… most people dont understand the decimal system though.😂

[@apollocreed5391]

If youre happy 😃and you know it spend your loot 🤑👏🏻👏🏻🇬🇧 If youre happy 😃and you know it spend your loot 🤑👏🏻👏🏻🇬🇧 If youre happy😃 and you know it and you really Want to show it, spend your loot!!! 🤑👏🏻👏🏻🇬🇧

[@christiancaspillo8584]

If your happy and you know Britain is falling down......

[@rob12x56]

​​@@christiancaspillo8584 says an American. You are failing even harder 😂?

[@taleswithtea3964]

ek din Britain jroor bhart k saamne ghutne k bal apni kartoot pr maafi maangega🙂 ye hmare aatmsamman Ka sawal h🙂

[@sharadjain2463]

Tata ki britain ki badi companies m malik h, Tata steel, Jaguar land rover, tetley. 1.50 lakh angrez kam kar rhe h in sb factories m.

[@OurBeautifulEngland]

This was in the middle of a world war, when Japanese controlled most of the routes into the country and a typhoon had destroyed important crops, people’s homes. Rice also shot up in price, while lots of the rice was ruined by a disease. There were tons of factors that led to the famine and I repeat, this was during a world war. I don’t believe the blame should be pinned on Winston Churchill, despite his Victorian views on race etc. His actions during world war 2 contributed massively to saving the world.

[@wolfmangoland7972]

Indian government must make a museum highlighting the atrocities Indians faced from the British.

[@insidiousantimason2025]

Among other “war time hero’s” such as Stalin and Mao... the Germans never called themselves nazis.

[@kh-fk3ko]

The 30 famines that india had to go through during the British reign still has effects on South Asians and others who relied on their food production. That is why South Asians have such a high risk of heart disease, stroke and diabetes.

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

The Bengal Famine of 1942 was a severe food shortage crisis that occurred in India's Bengal during World War II. The famine was caused by a combination of factors, including drought, the diversion of food to the war effort, and the inability of the Indian government to provide adequate relief. Additionally, the Japanese Empire's occupation of Burma/Myanmar reduced the food supply in Bengal. Marwari traders hoarded grain, exacerbating the food shortage. Canadian Prime Minister McKenzie King offered to send grain to Bengal, but British Prime Minister Winston Churchill ordered that grain be shipped from Australia instead. The ultimate responsibility for the crisis was attributed to the India Bengal government assembly, which failed to provide adequate relief and support to the people of Bengal. The Bengal Legislative Assembly had the power to make laws on agriculture, trade, and commerce, which could have helped to address the food shortage. The Government of India Act 1935 decentralized the administration of food and agriculture to the provincial governments, including Bengal. Natural disasters such as crop disease and cyclones had severely affected Bengal's food production. The Indian Bengal government was mostly made up of Indians, mostly Hindus ruling over Muslims during the famine between 1940 and 1945. The Hindu-majority party in power in Bengal, the Krishak Praja Party, had discriminatory policies towards Muslims, who made up a significant portion of Bengal's population. This worsened the famine's impact on the Muslim population. The Bengal Legislative Assembly was dissolved on 11th November 1942 by the British colonial authorities in response to the Quit India Movement. Although the assembly was dissolved, Indians continued to play a role in governing Bengal. Indian political leaders organized protests, strikes, and other forms of civil disobedience to pressure the British colonial authorities to address the pressing issues facing Bengal, such as the food shortage and the need for greater political autonomy. The Bengal Famine was one of the deadliest famines in human history, with an estimated death toll of between 1.5 and 3 million people. The famine affected mostly the rural areas of Bengal, where the poorest and most vulnerable people lived. The British colonial government was criticized for not doing enough to address the crisis and for exacerbating the situation by continuing to export food from India to other parts of the British Empire. Despite the difficult circumstances, many Indian leaders and organizations played an active role in providing relief to the victims of the famine. Some of the notable leaders who played a role in the famine relief efforts include Sarat Chandra Bose, Huseyn Shaheed Suhrawardy, Khwaja Nazimuddin, Fazlul Haq, and A. K. Fazlul Huq. These leaders organized relief camps, distributed food, and raised awareness about the severity of the crisis. In conclusion, the Bengal Famine of 1942 was a tragic event in Indian history that resulted in the loss of millions of lives. While there were multiple factors that contributed to the crisis, the failure of the India Bengal government to take adequate measures to address the food shortage was a major factor. Despite this, Indian leaders and organizations worked tirelessly to provide relief to the victims of the famine and played an important role in mitigating the severity of the crisis.

[@teecarter4900]

Who are we? A comment on the covid-19 situation brought me here. I had no idea? People really need to do there research. Concerning this pandemic.

[@Knightx392]

Greed

[@itsme6461]

I love how Jewish film industry constantly reminds the world of their story... It's shame on Indian film industry that even after 80 years of the famine, except Satyajit Ray no other director or producer ever produced a film on this.

[@sounakmukherjee2300]

see pic of churchill... ....dog or frog....

[@404epnf7]

He exactly looks like "Boar"...

[@humgurung1594]

This is a perfect lesson for the dictators of today, you will not be in peace lond after your death if you have lost your wisdom, humanity and ethic. Come on! wake up.

[@anglobhodaighosh6472]

Well explained . Churchill was possibly the most Brutal ruler in the world . He gave false promises to the Indian people'If you support us in WW II , you will be given freedom '. SHAME TO HIM .

[@MikeisVS]

Didn't the British leave 2 years after the war?

[@anglobhodaighosh6472]

@@MikeisVS Before they left India , British made it sure that ruling power would be in their stooges' hands . Also they had to distort Indian history sufficiently !!

[@geevikram2]

@@MikeisVS They didn't have much choice. They were almost bankrupt.

[@MikeisVS]

@@geevikram2 If that was true they wouldn't have left. The main reason to colonize a country is for profit. You're not going to let go of a revenue stream if you're bankrupt.

[@geevikram2]

You also need money to rule over a population(pay wages, logistics etc.). Britain absolutely did not leave out of moral conscience they just had no other choice.

[@toha1729]

We had similar mad-made famine in Ukraine (USSR) in 1932-1933. Joseph Stallin killed 9 millions of Ukrainians with famine

[@johnrichard2019]

That why he is considered as dictator and de Stalinsation happend in USSR after Stalin rule

[@ksenijaksenija8666]

​@@johnrichard2019 The massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia (Polish: rzeź wołyńska, lit. 'Volhynian slaughter'; Ukrainian: Волинська трагедія, romanized: Volynska trahediia, lit. 'Volyn tragedy'), were carried out in German-occupied Poland by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army, or the UPA, with the support of parts of the local Ukrainian population against the Polish minority in Volhynia, Eastern Galicia, parts of Polesia and Lublin region from 1943 to 1945.[7] The peak of the massacres took place in July and August 1943. Most of the victims were women and children.[8] Many of the Polish victims regardless of age or gender were tortured before being killed; some of the methods included rape, dismemberment or immolation, among others.[5] The UPA's actions resulted in between 50,000[1] and 100,000 deaths.[3][4][9]

[@ksenijaksenija8666]

The massacres of Poles in Volhynia and Eastern Galicia (Polish: rzeź wołyńska, lit. 'Volhynian slaughter'; Ukrainian: Волинська трагедія, romanized: Volynska trahediia, lit. 'Volyn tragedy'), were carried out in German-occupied Poland by the Ukrainian Insurgent Army, or the UPA, with the support of parts of the local Ukrainian population against the Polish minority in Volhynia, Eastern Galicia, parts of Polesia and Lublin region from 1943 to 1945.[7] The peak of the massacres took place in July and August 1943. Most of the victims were women and children.[8] Many of the Polish victims regardless of age or gender were tortured before being killed; some of the methods included rape, dismemberment or immolation, among others.[5] The UPA's actions resulted in between 50,000[1] and 100,000 deaths.[3][4][9]

[@johnrichard2019]

@@ksenijaksenija8666 did u mean Stephan Bandera and his ultranational shit army

[@kiranrajswastik3369]

Such a cruel man, may God will never forgive him for what he did to us Indian. You will always remember as a enemy for us Indian

[@rohitchakraborty6914]

Who do you mean by ' He ' , Winston Churchill, if you are talking about him then you should be more specific he did that to Bengalis, to take about Indian Bengalis would be wrong they are just Bengalis

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

@@rohitchakraborty6914 Indian newspapers say there was a drought Indian newspapers say there was cyclone hurricane Indian newspapers say there was a flood Indian newspapers say there was fungus Indian newspaper say there was hoarding Indian newspapers say there was Indian army in Burma who needed food from Bengali Indian newspapers are liars according to Indians

[@aryanaman7]

@@donkeydesiamericanprofessor scientific studies shows the rainfall was above average unlike british claims that there were droughts

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

@@aryanaman7 have you read Indian news paper? Double check your facts

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

@@aryanaman7 there had been almost 10 years of drought in Bengal and then there was cyclone and flood

[@नमोनारायण1]

It's not 3million people its 10 million people who died to hunger get your fact right karma will hunt you down this war crime how could this man escape without any serious punishment 😡

[@captainrogercall5742]

Nehi nehi 4 million tha

[@muhammadafnan6220]

And they said Hitler was evil and they were good the Bengal famine was one example of British barbarianism and there was Irish famine too and numerous other atrocities committed by the Brits they probably killed alot more than Hitler

[@Mr.Mister420]

0:38 Look at his Lap Dog

[@justarandomguywithoutaname8719]

Be respectful, i wasn't churchill's lapdog I was edwina's lapdog

[@o_o747]

Don't disrespect Mr nehru like that

[@Mr.Mister420]

@@o_o747 let me change it for u... His Very Lap dog

[@o_o747]

@@Mr.Mister420 why are you calling him like that?

[@Pranav4434]

@@o_o747 he deserve that title.

[@silverk1341]

These kind of things are happening now

[@DakeZak]

How many people died ? Wiki says 3.8 million

[@AnimatedBlast]

See the dailymail article

[@bold810]

There has NEVER been a leader whose hands didn't pour Rivers of Blood. Never.

[@ralphbernhard1757]

Actually, it was quite easy solve. What lacked was willpower. As the definition "famine" already suggests, it is man-made, and not entirely natural. Even worse than that, it would have been easy to avoid millions of deaths. Maybe not every death, but certainly many. *With a pot of ink and a table.* Certainly, even with a war going on (like during the 1943 famine), the most powerful empire in the world should have been able to do that. Line up the people, sell them a few kilos of rice/food at a government set price, finger in the pot, on your way... Note also, when food shortages *did* seem imminent or predictable for themselves, like during WW1 and WW2, food rationing *was* introduced. Strange, that it wasn't left to "market forces" to sort that out... So much for the "well, we didn't know it was going to be so bad"-excuses... But, of course Operation Legacy meant "winners" can sink evidence of crimes "to the bottom of the deepest oceans", or burn it, with instructions to ensure that ashes are ground to dust, and are not readable. I wonder what "evidence" was so embarrassing, that it had to be burnt to cinders? The construction of roads and schools maybe? Luckily for the British and *their* "popular or narrative history", most people are biased. Most people consider it "not so bad" letting people die of starvation, as opposed to actively murdering them. I assume, to the victim the effect is the same (perspective). You die. A bias known as "omission bias", and it's easy to fool people.

[@vyoshen4563]

Spare us the lecture and accept and open an investigation so we can all move on with facts. If he was found responsible then he would be if not equal but worse than Hitler. If he was not found responsible - it would close this matter

[@mitul206350]

A piece meal fasting will surely cease a body suffered through starvation. It's a science like we usually have seen in piece meal acquisition. It will also help one to go for greater protests by stoping meal completely. Thus, the cumulative effect of long starvation will make them "MURDERER". Note that, from today or TOMORROW, you will definitely see a different ME. Quote: Collected/Unknown

[@johnbrereton5229]

What nonsense ! Whose hand was in the 1770 famine ? The 1878 famine ? The 1978 famine ? Bengal suffered famines long before Churchill in 1943 the middle of WW2 and long after him.

[@herrhelmerich]

And actually, the same study shows that almost all of the previous famines in India (before the 1943 bengal famine), were caused by droughts. It also found that the chances of famine caused by drought, steadily decreased towards the end of the 19th and early 20th centuries. This was in part due to the enormous capital invested by the British into Irrigation projects (the large irrigation network in the world was created by the British government in the gangetic valley), Famine Codes, Railways, scientific methods of stockpiling, etc, all to eradicate famines in india-- which they essentially did. There was not a single famine in India from 1900 to 1943, and no large-scale famine since the 1890s. This comprises 50 years of famine-free British india, making up more than half of the entire duration (90 years) of the British Raj. Another contribution toward preventing famines came from the introduction and use of fertilisers.

[@siddxk]

His statement is noted and it shows how he cruelly ignored it.

[@johnbrereton5229]

@@siddxk In 1943 the British Empire was halfway through fighting WW2 where 2 million Indians VOLUNTEERED to fight for them. In the largest non conscripted army in history. Hardly the actions of a brutalised people as you are ridiculously claiming.

[@anshbali5623]

​​@@johnbrereton5229come on don't give shit to those who suffered because of you ....your bloody british empire army took our men at war forcefully wether they wanted or not .........even in ww1 we were forced in a war that meant nothing to us...no one damn volunteered for it

[@lovindersingh8714]

@@johnbrereton5229volunteered? Cut the crap. We know how you britishers forced our people to fight for them and also knew that we don’t eat beef. Still asked our soldiers to bite off the cover of the grenade required before throwing it which was made of cow’s flesh! When are you going to accept the war crimes committed by the United Fucking Kingdom?????

[@andishae2699]

India and Pakistan got their independence using the issue of Bengal Famine. The whole world will suffer for that

[@swagatamwbcs]

India must never forgive UK for what they did

[@laughube]

Just imagine once the pain and feeling parents were going through at that time. The feeling of seeing your children die of hunger. Winston Churchill comitted the barbaric crime that even it cant be forgiven ever

[@hasanimam8905]

I hope bengal will make them know how does it feels oneday I hope.

[@sinapreneur__]

Hope he is chilling like a chilli pepper in the hottest part of hell right now

[@udith]

Soviets and Americans won the war not UK Churchil is a villain

[@UpYours011]

Not even the Americans dude, they just took all the credit while Russia did all their dirty work... and after the war they turned against communism

[@yigon5412]

true

[@Utiaux]

ok battle of brittan if we did surrender to nazi germany then he would have invaded those said soviets

[@EliasRoy]

@@Utiaux Still would’ve nonetheless

[@rob12x56]

Uk definitely did help And don't forget Stalin and Roosevelt weren't too different

[@emiliobello2538]

Was Churchill a bad guy?

[@ritikagoel5271]

exactly bro

[@Fantastycustom]

Yes

[@dipakbharvad172]

BBC vale isse dikhaye.....

[@Louisdegalfilla7]

When peoplle consistently treat you badly its very hard not to take it personally, but when you look at their history it makes understand its not personal that is just who they are, Winston churchill starved 2 million people to death Without a drop of guilt. You have to be soulless to overlook killing of 2 million people because they was a different colour from you and you shouldn't be in position to say what is wrong and what is right because you proved you dont know the difference between wrong and right.

[@paromita10]

Racist to the tips of his toes was Churchill 😡

[@delvadebruyn1870]

Indeed I agree. But It seemed all politicians or at least most of the western country nations had questionable leaders at the time of the world wars.

[@1Redsaphir1]

This helped to win WW2. Yeah, 3 million people died, it's sad, but they would die anyway by the hands of Third Reich. After the battle, everyone is a general.

[@paromita10]

Redsaphir I am talking about the millions of people who died in Bengal India of starvation, as Churchill didn’t want the grains to be given to the Indians but kept in the coffers of the British as backup during the war!

[@paromita10]

Redsaphir DescriptionThe Bengal famine of 1943 was a famine in the Bengal province of British India during World War II. An estimated 2.1-3 million, out of a population of 60.3 million, died of starvation, malaria, or other diseases aggravated by malnutrition, population displacement, unsanitary conditions and lack of health care under the British Raj!

[@1Redsaphir1]

@@paromita10 yes? I know. You think Hitler would stop at the borders of Europe? Not.

[@d.tim1989]

There were probably thousands of people involved and to blame everything on Churchill is weak.

[@JB-if5or]

Not going to talk about Japanese invasion of Burma then which inevitably started the famine

[@Nothing_to_write0]

Thàt british propaganda to blame it on the Japanese

[@captainrogercall5742]

That is your fake history

[@rob12x56]

​​@@captainrogercall5742it's truth

[@karan_93]

We're focusing on why the BBC documentary was banned in India. While actually we should be making a full feature film exposing Churchill's hatred for Indians, how he is the biggest monster UK has ever produced. I really hope someone has the money and guts to make this film. And then the government should make it tax free so more n more people can go n watch it in theaters

[@vatsal7640]

Except bbc already did a video on Winston Churchill and Bengal famine . It's given KZbin

[@jimm6095]

Churchills did not create the famine but he refused to help those starving and suffering knowing that they would die! He hated Indians and when Canada, Australia and South Africa offered many tons of wheat for India in 1943 Churchill refused them all!

[@captainrogercall5742]

UK basically gave us English language, railways (that too unintentionally) and built some rules(that too applicable mostly for Indians).

[@ColonelFluffles]

They did a similar thing with the Irish

[@Officialnrb]

@@ColonelFluffles Scotland is part of the UK 🙄

[@ColonelFluffles]

@@Officialnrb i meant to say Irish Corrected*

[@sharadjain2463]

@@captainrogercall5742 English was not intended to be given . They want English speaking people to communicate between them and indian people and that's why it was taught to some very narrow class. Railways were gigantic colonial scam when it was built for the transport of exploited goods like cotton and coal to the port . British private investor made huge profits at the risk of indian public because Indians financed all the construction of railways . Shashi tharoor also said that kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWezkKuwo66pask

[@ArunUdai]

Did I just saw our PM 0:38

[@girishpalav4519]

indian version of grave of the fireflies.

[@d.tim1989]

Are you seriously saying India allowed this to happen and nobody said “hold the shipment of wheat, we will starve to death if the Brits have that” Churchill just like everyone else involved couldn’t possibly have seen into the future. If Indians couldn’t see what would happen how could the brits

[@Redsky973]

They had no say in it

[@d.tim1989]

@matteoferro4599 Are you saying they were gagged? Or did they just have no opinion? Perhaps they were all on holiday at the time these shipments went out. Or they were probably aware and just didn’t have the power of hindsight and, like Churchill, they couldn’t possibly foresee the shortage they would face.

[@Redsky973]

@d.tim1989 they were under british domination, their opinion wasn't taken into account

[@d.tim1989]

@matteoferro4599 That still doesn’t make Churchill to blame for the famine.

[@Redsky973]

@d.tim1989 Actually, it does. Everyone begged him to send food to india, but he didn't because hr thought indians were a "beastly people" and that he "wished the RAF sent one of the spare bombers to eliminate them". He was the one in charge, and his policy in india caused the famine

[@vietashroffoliver2521]

Unfortunately people are not awakened to the true nature of life. Life energy is eternal and cannot be destroyed. The law of cause and effect is a fact. One reaps what one sows however that works. Perpetrators of unfeeling cruelty will face the same one day. I hope we all are filled with altruism and empathy for each other.

[@krishnamohan1481]

Your words mean shit.

[@space4166]

Don’t let emotion cloud your judgement

[@rishu7880]

Why not

[@majorsid8]

Y'all will get what you deserve

[@sovietunion7101]

There is a quote that WINNERS WRITE THE HISTORY

[@theajitmore]

History is written by the victor

[@cosmicheathen1955]

This only talk about rainfall but famine had several cause, this report ignored the fungal infection spread in the crops which significantly destroyed the harvest, it also ignored the cyclone which also damaged the harvest, Japanese invasion on Burma and of-course the negligence by local authorities which were warned many times that something like this might happen.

[@rosesprog1722]

These may have played a part in it but Churchill's seizure of crops and refusal to allow the Canadiians and Australians to deliver their cargo to Indian ports WAS the cause of the famine. Remember his words: If there is a famine why isn't Ghandi dead? and They are a ghastly people with a ghastly religion. Churchill was a bloody bastard who had no respect whatsoever for all human life but his own.

[@WojtekTheBear2005]

As a Bengali, you white privileged Britishers shouldn't even talk about it. It's between churchill and bengalis, it's the verdict of us BENGALIS which is FINAL. White britishers sitting comfortable in London with their buildings made of stolen money should have NO SAY in a famine where bengalis were the victim. Malcom X was truly correct about you guys

[@GokuBlack-sn5dr]

may god punish him for eternity

[@historicalfacts-rv4qf]

No

[@GokuBlack-sn5dr]

@@historicalfacts-rv4qf thankfully god decides and not you

[@rob12x56]

​​@@GokuBlack-sn5dryou don't speak for thw god 😂😂 So stfu

[@sachindawer6026]

Wo insaan hi kya jiske andar daya bhawana na ho Aaj kal ye sab m khtm ho rahi h

[@aaronabreu6316]

The h royals or government going to apologies at all. Or mention they started concentration camps. Hustler Churchill only difference one has funny facial hair.

[@superiorbeing95]

Lots of lies about this on both sides, I don't know what to believe, what I do know is that this video is so shallow and the science so flimsy and meaningless that it's about as much use as a lettuce leaf fly swat as far as helping to draw any conclusive opinion.

[@Conn30Mtenor]

There are problems with this claim. For one, the Allies didn't yet have the numbers of ships available to divert to famine relief. They were still losing large numbers of ships to the U-Boat offensive and to the Japanese. Churchill asked FDR for ships but FDR had none to give at that point. Second, famines were not an unknown event in Bengal. Yes, Churchill's war cabinet (not just Churchill himself) were slow to react to the crisis but there was a lot on their "to do list" in 1943. I think that he could have done more but to suggest that Churchill alone was responsible is ridiculous.

[@vyoshen4563]

If it hurts too much. Its ok. Science proved there was no drought.

[@kyleebrahim8061]

@@vyoshen4563 it's more than just a drought in good production, is there data on production increasing? Were there any issues with produce quality, movement of surplus food by government to areas that most needed it? I'd be interested in that type of evidence

[@michaelmonaghan2717]

Thank you Charles. I thought your response was much more objective than the other's!

[@geevikram2]

@@kyleebrahim8061 Which part about British buying all the food supplies from Bengal therefore starving Bengali's is not clear? Why do you think there would be a sudden drop in produce quality that year? I realize truth hurts, but come-on, Britan was the super-power of the world at that time with the World's largest navy. What's ironic, Chruchill specifically instructed an Aussie ship that had docked at Calcutta (Bengal's largest port city) to divert grain supplies to Europe and not feed the starving Indians! I guess he is still your hero. And your nonsense about war-cabinet not having time -- I'm sure they would've had time if it were 4M brits dying instead of Indians.

[@kyleebrahim8061]

@@geevikram2 I'm not interested in your talking points, show me why India with the second largest arable land on earth could not provide for its own people, they had to focus their efforts on the war as well but why was it to the extent of a famine? Were other provinces immune to famine? It's not like they were exporting food, the British had no resources to do that. It's okay if you can't explain it but don't give me this Churchill did it BS

[@ananyamaitra2831]

Indian film makers should make films on Bengal's exploitation by British.

[@kishankr8537]

It's not he could be responsible HE IS RESPONSIBLE

[@jacobfield4848]

Over 2.4 million people a year die of starvation in india today. More people died of starvation since 1947 than did under the British or Mughal rule put together. The Bengal famine was caused by the Japanese and the death toll was mainly down to food hoarding by the Muslim League. There was plenty of food in India during the famine, sadly it was being sold at a profit and hoarded by those in charge, all of whom were Indian leaders mainly Muslims and some Hindu's.

[@QsourelConvil]

typical englishman, starts whining when caught

[@scottya3615]

That simply is not true

[@jacobfield4848]

@@scottya3615The Muslim League hoarded food and sold it at a massive profit. This was well accepted at the time and is well documented. The Muslim League refused to call in the Famine Codes soi they could raise inflation and make a profit.

[@theundead1600]

Ok so 1 rain causeing flood doesn't come from churchill 2 droughts werent churchill. 3 his decisions to diver food strained the people of bengal. 4 is my question. Why did the other areas if india not give food to bengal? I am not familiar with this part of 1940s history. ( should be obvious). Unfortunately people are wring as i did hear about the bengal famine in my world history in a Public school in the US. Ill look things up on my own. Its always good to see different sides. We need to remember ine thing learn from history or repeat the same attitudes and habits. Some evidence from churchills close friends and family show his white superiority belief had changed. In that we can see people can be better. But im sure my positve spin wil gain negitive feedback due nit burning him in today. Because his actions lead to events that lead to mass death. Maybe this is why we see many nations do small acts of warfare and not large scale like ww2. Just spit balling.

[@anupamtiwari5587]

Seriously? You do know that the so called other areas were under British control as well and they didn't have the power to do so. Even Australia sent food but that too was diverted from the Indians. Well, can't blame you. Western history books are WHITE-washed whereas we guys have to learn about both sides of the coin.

[@sanjayvaidya4925]

Read up uk sc ruiling in the maumau rebellion judgement. Now 14 carribbean nationa unite to sue their former colonizers.

[@VED036]

There was no invasion of any country in the colonial locations by England. I insist on the word ‘England’. In South Asia, England did have supremacy over a nation called British-India. This nation was less than half of the combined locations of current-day Pakistan, India and Bangladesh. Maybe roughly slightly more than one-third. This nation was not created by conquering any nation called India, in the subcontinent. Instead, when the English East India Company set up trading centres in some of the locations, the French government gave orders to the French trading centres to attack all English trading centres anywhere in the world. In South Asia, the French instigated some of the local rulers to attack the English trading centres. In most of these fights, French soldiers were directly involved. In some of them even Italian soldiers also stood with the French. South Asia at that time was around 2000 small and big kingdoms. However, in all these fights, the English invariably won. That was due to the superb support given to them by the slave populations and some of the kings who saw in them a very refined people. In the subcontinent, refinement is something not seen anywhere. Beyond that the fact that English is a planar language, while the other languages were feudal also was a very powerful deciding factor. As to the Bengal starvation, this is a new bit of history going round on the internet in recent times. The fact is that in the Subcontinent, around 80% of the population were slaves, even though they were generally defined as lower castes. Many of them were seen as half animals or domestic cattle by the higher castes.. The very understanding that they were human beings came with setting up of the British-India. Organisation like the London Missionary Society, though not allowed to work inside British-India was able to free the slave populations in the native-kingdoms with the active support of British-Indian govt. In British-India, around 99.9999999999 of the officials were the local people. And British-India was ruled by elected Cabinet ministers who were south-Asians. Both these people generally do have a disposition to view the lower populations with disdain. This continues to this very day. In current-day India, around 70% of the population live lives in various levels of poverty, starvation and slavery. The languages are terribly feudal and the words have the power to club down the lower placed persons. No one of the higher ups really care about this. They treat the lower classes as dumb animals. They are made to sit on the floor and addressed and referred to with pejorative forms of You, He, She &c. If there was starvation in Bengal, Great Britain or England has nothing to do with it. There was a British-Indian government in the location, which was committed to the welfare of the citizens there. However, the local landlords will not allow the lower populations to escape from their clutches. In the 1960s the lower classes tried to break out in a revolt. For, after the English rule departed, they were literally treated like wild animals. That was the famous Naxalbari movement. Many of them were summarily killed. The intellectual leader of the movement Charumazumdhar was taken to the police station and beat to death. This the reality of current-day India. As to the English rule in the subcontinent, it was built up and maintained by the support of the common people of the nation. No sane person of those times would have supported a shift from English rule to hooligan rule. Both Nehru and Gandhi were not from British-India. They were just individuals from the traditional exploiter classes of the subcontinent. A clear picture of how British-India was created can be seen by Search for Malabar Manual into which I have written a commentary. This book is free for download / reading in academia edu and archive org.

[@rajeshwarijanwadkar9369]

Ha ha LoL . No country will go to other country and do good. The invasion was because India was super rich country when Britishers arrived. They looted India and took heavy taxes from everyone. England will pay for its Karma. We all Indians love our fellow Indians . Islam will take over England , go save your country.

[@VED036]

@@rajeshwarijanwadkar9369 First, your Lol and Ha, Ha could be very disturbing. Generally, as you might know, people do not mix or have a conversation with anyone they see in India. For, the Lol and Ha, Ha is generally used by the relatively low class to distress those who keep a distance. However online, anyone can speak to anyone and use a Ha Ha. Second item is that you are pretty well educated in the history that is taught in common school textbooks. These books are foolish and fooling. As to what really happened cannot be mentioned here in a comment. It is not easy to correct some 10 to 15 years of nonsense taught in school and college books. Since I am from Malabar, which was known as British Malabar, before the idiot known as Clement Atlee handed it over to the low class Hindi folks, there is not need for me to go and save England. It is true that England should be very careful. For people like you will definitely love to go there and make the place similar to India. As to India, it is run on feudal languages. England run on planar language English. The difference is terrific. In India, the officialdom which swallows the whole national wealth are the Aap people. However, below them are several levels of Thoo people. This is the real difference. When people like you move to England, you would love to convert the working class there into the Thoo people. From you Lol and Ha, Ha, it is obvious the power of your Thoo. It is literally like a menial class worker in India addressing his heighest superior with a Thoo. The superior will stink. It is best for England to send home all people from out including India. As to what really took place in South Asia during colonial days, you will get immense information from Malabar Manual written by William Logan. I have done a commentary on this. If you do want to know the incidences, you can read that book (for free). Or else you can continue to believe the nonsense you have been told by the Aap people (govt employees). As to how the Thoo people are treated in India by the Aap people, you can see from how the migrant workers are living now. There was no India or Pakistan or Bangladesh before British-India. There were around 2000 minute kingdoms. Fighting and fighting always. QUOTE: They looted India and took heavy taxes from everyone. END OF QUOTE. You have zero information on what took place inside British-India and what took place in the native-Kingdoms (now part of India and Pakistan). From your Lol and Ha, Ha, it is obvious that these kind of information will come out from your mind. Maybe you do not have any experience of going to an Indian government office like the Sales tax. Take care of you own country run by the Hindi folks. 70% are under the Indians. Only god can save them from Indian officials. QUOTE: We all Indians love our fellow Indians. END OF QUOTE. Do not tell lies. Aap people see the Thoo people as stinks. That is the truth about India. I have not written this much for you to read. It is mainly for others who might see you nonsense.

[@VED036]

@Mahesh M V U I will give nicer try. British India was a nation with its own government and elected cabinet ministers. Bombay, Calcutta and Madras were three presidencies of British India. If the local elected government failed, the blame is with the local government and local officials. As to millions dying, it is a new history. However, in South Asia, no one cares for others. Even now, innumerable other language workers are literally starving, walking and suffering a terrible time on the roads. History writers can blame England for this also. England stole everything! Actual fact is Indian government officials are swallowing up the nation. Their pay and perks are multiple times that of an ordinary workers. British India was handed over to the Hindiwalas without any referendum. No sane person will vote to move from English rule to that under Hindi rule.

[@VED036]

@Mahesh M V U Wonder who will rot in hell for each of poor workers suffering under the Indians!

[@VED036]

@Gutta Shashank There's no need for you to write so much. All of what you wrote are more or less there inside NCERT school textbooks published by the Indian government. And in Wikipedia Indian pages written by useless Indian academicians who are swallowing an astronomically huge pay and perks every month for 13 months a year. Everything you wrote is known to everyone who reads these nonsense. Google search for something different. Search for Malabar Manual. You can download it from archive Org or academia edu or Telegram. You get some information you would not have even dreamt of. You might also get to know what a feudal language is. Without knowing this, it is a very shallow attempt to judge and evaluate English rule

[@aamirnawab3093]

Ppl r still in same condition

[@_Hubal]

It's a result of mass robbery

[@EliasRoy]

If a thing called KARMA exists, the Brits will experience that one day. R.I.P to those people who died in this famine

[@aryanaman7]

i wish they dont, all i wish is they also accept and stop the racism, killing millions again isnt worth and its also gonna affect world economy

[@donkeydesiamericanprofessor]

@@aryanaman7 are you calling British racist compared to Indians?

[@rob12x56]

Yeah, sure pal Keep blaming the present for the past. Real mature

[@osmanamjid2432]

So what's the difference between Churchill and Hitler

[@senor2930]

One fought for the colonizers & NWO Other fought against them. So, you know who is vilified & who is upheld as the hero.

[@TheAArmstrong]

Hitler was evil. 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

[@noahjohnson5312]

one killed white people; the other killed non white people; wait a minute; look at the color of irish people's skin

[@Nat-uw4fs]

I'm fairly sure in 1943 Britain, as did the remainder of the free world, had more important concerns to worry about.

[@captainrogercall5742]

British a backbone less empire

[@SirDrakeFrancis]

it was a decision actually

[@HasntMohi]

So, they decided to starve the Bengali population so they have a food surplus in the warfront.

[@youneedtocalmdown.]

More important concerns than 3 million lives?

[@Nat-uw4fs]

@@HasntMohi The Bengalis starved themselves. When supply was requested it was turned down on the basis of limited shipping supply due to naval buildup for the invasion of Normandy; or would you prefer D-Day to have failed? OK, if so, a failure at Normandy would have crippled Britain, given Hitler the time he required to capitulate Russia and seize the oil supply, drawing out the war and only exacerbating the impacts of the famine; and this time there wouldn't be any hope of a bail out from Britain. Churchill merely chose the lesser evil. Though you indoctrinated fools just need a scapegoat for all your problems.

[@annalehman93941]

Rishi Sunak strikes back!

[@josephstalin6315]

Stalin saved millions of them !

[@deokumarsingh8886]

Not 3 millions but 3-5 millions to be exact 4.3 millions.

[@leighjordine4031]

Indian people still live in poverty. Who you blaming for that then?

[@RedGuy3981]

History Bruh.... Go read some

[@leighjordine4031]

@@RedGuy3981 Let me guess its nothing to do with the Indian poeple.

[@UpYours011]

Let me guess, it has nothing to do with the British ... nooo no no

[@gopro979]

@@leighjordine4031 are you fat and lazy?

[@ShuKranAllaH]

Then, it is ok if you starve and kill more of them? Like there are already many of them starving, lets starve them more to get more power? Since they are already weak, it is ok to destroy and mash them even more for you to get more power?

[@senuoyyounes7639]

western humanity

[@devanshchauhan3149]

If I had to read I would from an article not from a video.

[@shrayoseemanna6281]

He is responsible!!!

[@tariq-z3d]

He was a monster not a hero

[@AdityAditi2018]

The whole great Britain should be ashamed of what their folks did in the past. I am sure they are paying back for their sins in someway or the other

[@notyourtypefan7743]

Battle of britian is karma of britian

[@TheAArmstrong]

Yer we’re swamped by Indian scammers

[@ConstructiveMinds100]

What can I add? Psychopaths, dirty human nature, greed. The UK ships carried coffee from South America were often sunken down to keep the coffe price high. Greed, greed greed rising again to mamoth size.

[@nrc5290]

It's not he could be !!!! HE IS and many more !!!!!!!!!!!

[@JohnBrown-sn3kh]

apooR Choz your comment is 8 months old and look what's going on today regarding Churchill wow

[@jamesmoylan2861]

Wrong he has saved millions of not billions of lives. This is nothing more than fascistforexcryptoalliance propaganda machine. There was food in India, Grain hoarding by local Speculators was a problem and other regions of India not wanting to donate food. The original problem terrible crop failure due to bad weather.

[@jamesmoylan2861]

@@JohnBrown-sn3kh I am pleased because hopefully this will highlight the world economic peace treaty promise to the troops 3 weeks after D-Day for stabilization of world currencies as a foundation for a lasting peace. Speculatlon in India by Indian grain Speculators in Bengal famine. Speculatlon causing wallstreet crash/ bonanza and ultimately ww2 that Churchill warned about 1925 .for Stabilization of world currencies, 1944 world economic peace treaty. Stabilization of world currencies no 1.

[@jamesmoylan2861]

Wrong,this is forexfascist cryptocurrencies financing child crime and modern SLAVERY KKK white supramecists encrypted on the dark Web propaganda.

[@jamesmoylan2861]

@Indian Atheist @StephoniX I think I would get a lot more for publication of Bretton Woods not mentioning Stabilization of world currencies and the size of the Forex and a book about Churchill by Boris sayingg Churchill was a speculator but not mentioning his "and we take these measures against speculators of any country of any kind and of any hue.... countries are like ships in a dock tied together by trade and if one falls it can pull down the rest with it" Hansard gold standard 1925. Had they opened the umbrella properly ,not stood around with an unopened umbrella saying it doesn't work. No Wall street bonanza/cash No great happiness/depression No HITLER Blaming innocent people and migrants No.Holocaust No WW2 No Bengal famine,(no grain hoarding by Speculators in India)Hansard grain hoarding 1943. No Bretton woods. But a gold standard or Stabilization of world currencies. "...Any large movements of currency detrimental to the world economy should be outlawed..." Perhaps "No we cannot save that convoy we need to protect ultra to make sure of success of D Day ." We should not let Forex trading flush our war dead down the pan too. Or cryptocurrencies traderd nab children and young girls for the dark Web perhaps tortured live pay per view with cryptocurrencies.

[@DipakBose-bq1vv]

It was not 3 million, but 6 million according to Prof. S. Bhattacharya of Leeds University. According to Prof PC Mahalanobis the founder of the Indian Statistical Institute, at least 5 million were died as the direct result of the famine, and another 5 million died afterwards as a result of the famine related diseases.

[@mrlarolapra6288]

Hi

[@insidiousantimason2025]

The South African Boer suffered the first ever concentration camps under the British, that’s where Churchill cut his teeth as a youth.

[@vaishnav9794]

Hai

[@grandcanyon-d4d]

It doesn't matter which ethnically groups you are or what your skin colour is, this is pure evil.

[@Red.bulldozer3]

What indians had done to demand apology and compensation from British.

[@utcristbamrara3272]

He could be responsible ×. He was responsible.

[@rob12x56]

Nope.

[@johnnyy1186]

Well done

[@pranjalbiswas6886]

#bengalhateschurchill

[@thakur2204]

CHURCHILL " THE FOOL".

[@historicalfacts-rv4qf]

No