Script of the Harappan Civilization | Dr. Nisha Yadav | ASC IITGN

[@ganapathisrinivasan2002]

The tribal people of Araki valley and Orissa north Andhra border their language and signs and phonetics may be used as a context as they look similar to the figures on the seals and statues etc

[@ganapathisrinivasan2002]

@Soul search Yes Chola kingdom extended upto Vizag .perhaps beyond along the east coast . Sindh and Sindhi culture may also yield some pointer to the Harappan script decipherment hopefully cheers

[@manishkushwaha7629]

If most scripts found on seal, which mostly make mirror impressions on object where they are pressed. If writing showing right to left moving but actually they will be left to right on impression.

[@n.dasilvasantosjunior1796]

They take into account the impression, not the original seals, so it is definitely right to left. Mrs. Yadav said it: 1:02:08

[@PradeepSharmaPlus]

There is a very good video about deciphering the syllables and relation of the devnagari script with indus valley symbols by "Sangam Talks" - Decipherment of the Indus Script | Praveen Kumar Mishra | #SangamTalks there are a lot of sounds that are sanskrit words based. Its Sanskrit to a good extent.

[@gyanendrasinha3120]

before sanskrit and devnagri there was dhamm and pali and kharosthi. Devnagri is much recent

[@kanishkgulwadi9245]

@@gyanendrasinha3120 He never talked about devnagri idiot. Sanskrit is older than pali and all prakrits ancient Prakrit scholars themselves confirmed this.

[@gyanendrasinha3120]

@El Malakh Feo any proofs? Any inscription? In India the oldest inscriptions decoded so far are from Pali language in dhamm script? What was the original script of Sanskrit? The word sanskrit contains the letter ri which itself didn't existed before devnagari. Give proofs.

[@kanishkgulwadi9245]

@@gyanendrasinha3120 Hemchandra a medieval Prakrit scholar himself wrote in his book that Prakrits came from Sanskrit. The ṚgVeda, oldest Indian text is in Archaic Sanskrit.

[@gyanendrasinha3120]

@@kanishkgulwadi9245 my friend, where is the archeological evidence? Someone writing something doesn't make it history. Where is linguistic evidence? Where is proof of dating of rigveda. The manuscript refered is itself on paper and birch leaf dated 1464 AD in Sharda script. Anywhere you go in India, 3000 years old stone inscriptions are all prakrit, Pali and in dhamm Buddhists scripts. Taxsila, Nalanda, Vikramshila, Sarnath, etc.all are Buddhists.

[@ranapratapsingh3416]

Nice research work. Consistency is what is important in applying a language to the Indus script.

[@anupkumar6714]

Dr. Nisha Yadav thank you for this talk. When one of the first studies looking at structure and hierarchy, similar to contemporary languages, among symbols on seals was published by you and Rajesh Rao in 2009 its potential was obvious. By the way love the kitchen kiddo with his shadow play

[@AbleLawrence]

Since seals are used to make impressions, shouldn’t we take the direction of writing as the opposite of the seals.

[@johnprakashrajkumarr1131]

The script is similar to finding in Keeladi Tamilnadu

[@jitendrasemil342]

use gondi lipi to decipher indius script many similarities bw them....plz check...

[@torontodough2755]

maybe it can be left to right because thats what the animal direction is facing :D @13:53

[@utubetruthteller]

This shows current writing of language evolved over millennium after so much evolution that we simply take this for granted

[@Joseph-yu4lx]

They were trading community people of Ancient Tamilnadu who had settled there for conducting trade with western developed nations like Sumeria. As for as their convenient trading was safe and prosperous they remained there. When declining trends were there they started their migrations towards their original homeland Tamilnadu.

[@Joseph-yu4lx]

Of course the migration journey was tedious. On the way some people stayed in preferable places. The Lingayats history may be connected and considered here. But the nucleus of the group the traders reach ed another port city in the eastern region Kaveripoompattinam that was growing then. There they stayed and continued their born trading activities with the eastern countries.

[@sheikhjavedalisindhi3289]

The wearing of Bangles may be done by Tamil women in their pregnancy in India but here around Mohenjodaro (Sindh) women wear iron bangles in their feet for safe birth of their babies🙏❤😊

[@ankithooda1536]

I think it is better to assume various contexts and then check which are compatible. Don't know how far not assuming any context can decipher the information.

[@colorguppies]

One should never assume. One should hypothesize and then prove it wrong or right.

[@shivPrakashPal108]

YOU SAID THAT SEALS MIGHT PROBABLY USED FOR CLAY PUNCHING GOODS AND WRITING IS FROM RIGHT TO LEFT FOR SEALS SO THAT MEANS THAT SEALS WERE WRITTEN RIGHT TO LEFT BUT READ LEFT TO RIGHT ONLY FOR SEALS BUT FOR THE STUFF OTHER THAN SEAL THEY NOT ONLY READ IT FROM LEFT TO RIGHT BUT ALSO WRITTEN INTENTIONALLY. AM I RIGHT?

[@abhinav9374]

Yea I thought the same lol

[@ajaysinghmankotia2253]

Thank you. please think, if i got a tamil script, but i do not know, tamil. how can i understand tamil words and the meaning of tamil words, untill and unless any body teach me tamil. how to pronunciate a letter or words. what it means.

[@vipulchaturvedi7390]

Are there any signs corresponding to grain crops or something signifying a river or water body? Can this model be applied to a known script i.e. brahmi to test the veracity of surmises it can offer? The process itself will bring out new dimensions to work on.

[@Rick1234567S]

I only know one clan who was in the Indus Valley. And really trade with Mesopotamia and Egypt probably goes way back so they may have migrated there for the farm land and from where who knows. It is not hard to read. I watched a video today which was about copper and bronze production items they were making and shipping. I couldn't understand his symbolism. The unicorn is part of the flood myth and Noah of course which before that was Gilgamesh, and before that in India it was a unicow. So it gradually goes from a realistic unicow to an abstract unicorn so one thing we agreed on, it means horses and cows as in livestock. Now in front of the early one you see Noah;s ark. That becomes the ark of the covenant so a sign of truth and honesty in advertising which much of the seals were. Like labels on a box of tomatoes. I broke it down quite clearly in another video if you can find my comments there. search this Rajesh Rao: Computing a Rosetta Stone for the Indus script So what I show is that it was not enough to just say tea. We grow tea. No you had to say fertilized and irrigated and other things to tell the middleman, who does the selling. And farmed not gathered. Fresh and pure and all those things you say on a box of tomatoes.

[@rehanansari009]

Thanks you dr Nisha yadav

[@AbleLawrence]

We need more excavations to discover more seals and writings

[@panderichthys_rhombolepis]

@Lawrence, would you be @able to help out on this front?

[@GlimpseofSindh]

Thanks for sharing. 🙏🏻❤️

[@nvcworld6423]

@ 20:00 it's not Pashupatinath , I can explain it

[@hrithikmaity609]

are u archeologist ? it is accepted by ncert and historians as pashupati but when the entire script will be deciphered it will be clear if it is or not but for now it is pashupati

[@nvcworld6423]

@@hrithikmaity609 if it's Pashupatinath than there is no temple found, how strange right, there are many Thory by main stream guys got failed so you can't trust them and it's a Gonda god you can search you will come to know

[@zojozojo-ox6wj]

​@@hrithikmaity609 😂😂 🤣🤣

[@risingsun9064]

Excellent talk! very rigorous research.

[@SwapnilNarayan9]

Is it true that a person name Samar is mentioned in Mesopotamian record from Meluha?

[@shivagill3133]

I enjoyed the comment section (full of baseless claims)

[@latha0]

Nice talk and excellent replies. From linguistic point of view the signs as graphemes and allographs it was found that it follows regular pattern apart from other non script symbols Patterned linear arrangement suggests language communication. Being interested in indus script and it's decipherment I have gone through several papers. What has been found that there is a clear indication of kharoshthi script especially in one seal of two letters only.. Single sign maay look deviated due to individual handling. Has to check for kharoshthi and evolution of kharoshthi language. Works on kharoshthi.

[@1joshjosh1]

Dr. Nisha is a smoke show. 😍😃

[@hscplusclinics3661]

Though no one is talking about ship building in relation to Dholavira, the Dholavira signboard reads: (shipbuilding)(yard)(longlive)

[@krishanuganguly6831]

Tremendous endeavour... Keep it up. All the best.

[@sonarbangla8711]

Nisha is right, deciphering the Indus script probably related to the spoken language of the region, like Gujrati prakrit/Sanskrit or Vedic.

[@shivagill3133]

Prakrit is a group of languages not equivalent of sanskrit

[@gbhargavi4744]

This seals are business and intiligence department codes ,between one ruling part to another ruling parts.

[@indusscriptandindianhistor605]

Nice research

[@utubetruthteller]

Is it possible these seals were coins of indus Valley civilization

[@RajuSagiGayatriMata]

Dr. Nisha Yadav did not show any meaningful movement towards the "Goal Post" of deciphering "Script of the Harappan Civilization". I am afraid that the title is too far fetched to justify the content.

[@ajaysinghmankotia2253]

Very soon. We will be able to deciferment of indus script.

[@praveepronoff]

At the 12 th minute , I see something very wrong in the logical decoding of the words .. we don’t use 2 meanings of a picture to define a new word rather we use two pictures to define a new word .. for example.. yeah man holding a chicken will be called as poultry.. a man holding a fish will become a fisherman … that’s how we should decode

[@ParikshitBhujbal]

What we really need is an Indian version of Rosetta stone

[@jamjamg111]

Hello, The below punctures,debunks the theory that "Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) is Aryan or North Indian and not Dravidian or South Indian". I'm a south indian Tamil and I really pity with the north indians (shoulder to shoulder) for all the war atrocities that happened to north indians' ancestors & women long back due to the islamic invasions. But that's not the excuse,reason to claim that "IVC is Aryan or North Indian" by some unfair North Indians who are pro-sanskrit & pro-hindi & think that they gave,taught culture to south indians. Now let me come to the point. How do u explain the white skin of north, north-west indians , their european-like looks ? So the black man from africa directly came & settled here in North India, then he turned white over 1000s of yrs without roaming in the indian sun, then he directly started speaking (proto-)sanskrit & became an Aryan & then spread to the rest of the world and that the population of the whole world descended from North Indians ? Unbelievable lies or that u r living in another world ! Skin turns white only when a life lives in temperate,polar regions where sunlight is minimum.Actually the skin craves to absorb sunlight for vitamin D and when there is less sunlight, it sheds the black melanin pigment (that acts as an inhibitor,protector of skin from harmful UV) and turns white over a period of time.If u don't trust me on this, then have u ever noticed the skin turning white right/only under ur wristwatch ? So the north indians' ancestors lived there somewhere in,near steppe pastoral regions (yamna) long enough for their skin to turn white, then only they migrated into india. I believe they didn't invade india/kill dravidians or south indians. Dravidians were the original inhabitants,builders of Indus valley civilisation(IVC).Till now there is no sign,no trace,no evidence(not even 0.0000001%) of Vedas,vedic gods(Indra,Varuna,Laxmi, Sarasvathi etc....),vedic rituals(fire based),ramayana(Ram,Sita,Hanuman etc...),mahabharata(Pandavas etc...) in IVC despite so many,decent levels of excavation till now.Whatever little evidence,proof given by all the supporters of the theory that "IVC is aryan" or say "aryan IVC theory" is flimsy like showing some terracotta dolls in various postures & saying that it represents yoga, pasupathinath statue which can be claimed by historians as that of a chieftain or by south indians also as their primitive,native,non-vedic gods like Iyappan or Karuppanasami etc.... There is a clear difference between vedic gods of north indians and the non-vedic gods of south indians(like maariamman in tamilnadu, Maramma in Karnataka,murugan,karuppanasaami god's worship in tamilnadu,cobra worship,phallus or masculinity,femininity,fertility worship (linga, stone carving which shows 2 cobras coiled together) etc...) On the contrary, IVC is irreligious(not even a single,small temple was found in IVC just like in TamilNadu's Keeladi civilisation) and jallikattu (bull taming sport of Tamils) seal was discovered at IVC, proving that "IVC is Dravidian" or say "Dravidian IVC theory". scroll.in/article/827497/is-jallikattu-hindu-or-dravidian-an-indus-valley-seal-might-have-the-answer No other proof can be more damaging, devastating to the claim of some(not all) unfair North Indian-Hindi-Sanskrit-Hindutva zealots that "IVC is Aryan or North Indian" than the above "Jallikattu" seal found in IVC. We all know that not even a single Pakistani village or a citizen or a single North Indian village or a North Indian played or plays the bull taming sport of Jallikattu which only South Indians esp. Tamils play. Forget all other proofs. Forget cracking IVC's script.This Jallikattu seal is more than enough to categorically state that "IVC is Dravidian". It's all written on the wall that "IVC is Dravidian" & still those Northy and brahmin(ism) zealots are pretending not to read it. Another clinching proof. Do u know ? Brahui is actually a Dravidian/South Indian language (remnant of ancient proto-dravidian language of IVC) that's still being spoken by a minority in Pakistan. The Brahui people chose to stay there in IVC after it's collapse and got converted into muslims due to islamic invasions. But biologically they are south Indians. Ever asked a Q "How the hell did a south indian language land right in the middle of pakistan ?". South Indians/dravidians abandoned IVC around 1900BCE and migrated deep into south india (most probably due to drought) shortly before Aryans or north indians (not invaded but) walked into india with their (horses,?) cattle around 1500BCE. The IVC dravidians mixed with aadhi-dravidians of south india after they migrated deep into south india since there was no caste, no discrimination at that time. They make up today's entire south indian population who are a mix of fair & dark-skinned people. Later the south indians learnt about caste, discrimination from the vedic north indians & they too started practising it. Note that sanskrit has borrowed from Tamil, the way tamil has also borrowed from sanskrit.These borrowings of loan words don't make 1 language as superior or mother of other language. IVC's undeciphered script is proto-dravidian rebus script. Tamil scholar Iravatham Mahadevan and Finnish Indologist Asko Parpola are the foremost authorities on this script and Asko had provided a good rebus explanation of part of the script based on Tamil words (Min or (vin)meen which means shine or fish or star in Tamil). Plus see below other (Hindi video) proofs. kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWLOn3igp91-ndE kzbin.info/www/bejne/j5KpdXiNmcqEntk Piliru in literary, ancient Tamil means elephant. Pall or Pallu means tooth in not just Tamil but in most of the south indian languages. Ivory (& it's products') exports from IVC were called as words resembling "Piliru,Pillu,Pallu etc..." in neighbouring civilisations. Pls see below another (Tamil Video) proof. This is Balakrishnan IAS officer who had uploaded his proof - "The Pot Route" in harappa.com in full support of "Dravidian IVC theory". His proof is about how the black and redware pottery of IVC and the pottery of tamilnadu are one and the same and can be manufactured by only one type of reverse method. kzbin.info/www/bejne/hIusaoanh8iAgMU Also, Lion is the darling of north indians (u can see that in ashoka chakra - national emblem of India) whereas tiger is the darling of south indians. And India is,was a land of tigers. For the north indians, the knowledge about the tiger came late since they came late into india. For the south indians, tiger is/was an inseparable part of their culture as can be seen in village festivals where a man disguising as a tiger often appears to please the crowds,kids.IVC has many tiger inscribed seals, no lion was found in IVC. Birth of Hinduism : There were no major fights,wars between Aryans or North Indians and Dravidians or South Indians except few,minor skirmishes,fights,wars. Why ? How ? If there were major wars, then I'm sure either the north indian ancient literary works or the ancient Tamil literary works would have spoken volumes about it. Also, u need both the intention to kill & iron for wars,mass killing. The iron age too had not reached it's prime time then. So there was no major fights,wars between them. Rather friendly,mutual exchange of rudimentary religious practices,trade, exchange of writing systems,words,ideas,inventions like pots,wheels,axle etc... happened between them. They both by working together forged hinduism and other india-based religions only during the last 3500 yrs(from 1500BCE onwards) and not before that. Finally, if Aryans didn't build IVC, only Dravidians did, then it means that the north indians were migratory pastoralists who lacked a civilisation and walked into india and saw/observed the south indians and learnt what settling in 1 place means,what agriculture is,what house is etc... & then they built their villages,towns,cities etc.... Evolution of Tamil script : Tamil script has evolved a lot over millennia just like a worm to a butterfly evolution. 1)Proto-dravidian or proto-tamil used in Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) by IVC south indians/tamils used the Indus (rebus) script during those times. 2) Later, the early and medieval tamil used pallava script,vatteluththu - another type of script and only historians specialised in it can read it. Modern day tamil script is different from even vatteluththu and we in modern times can only read the modern tamil script. Got the point ? Don't ask stupid Q's like "If IVC or Indus script is Tamil, then why are the tamils not able to read it ?".

[@jamjamg111]

@Vaishali Pedram First I tell u 1 interesting fact. Pls have this below real, science-supported story in mind before reading further. We all evolved from apes in Africa & moved out from there in different waves of migration. The evolution period of homo-sapiens occurred from some 2 million yrs ago to 2 lakh yrs ago. By around 2 lakh yrs ago, humans/homo-sapiens reached how we all look like today. The 1st wave of migration into india from africa was done by aadhi-dravidians(who are the SC/ST/Tribal communities,castes of India) some 1 lakh yrs ago. They settled mostly in southern/coastal india & also in hilly regions & some of them only later migrated (using small boats) to indonesia, australia (who became Australian aboriginees) & to many Pacific islands some 50000 yrs to 1 lakh yrs ago (not exactly accurate time periods but tentative, approximate time periods). These migrations happened so long back that they developed their own language, culture etc... in Indonesia, in Australia etc.... that's distinct from our/India's aadhi-dravidians) But the fact is, they are closely related to our/India's aadhi-dravidians. The second wave of (proper) migration into (south)India was done by dravidians from IVC(Indus Valley Civilisation) after IVC's collapse in 1900BCE due to severe drought. The third wave of migration into India was done by Aryans/North Indians few 100 yrs after the collapse of IVC.

[@jamjamg111]

@Vaishali Pedram Tx Vaishali. Pls find below my findings, observations, inferences. It was a distress migration from North(-west) IVC to south india that was done by dravidians. The IVC collapsed due to severe drought that was prevailing around it's final days/yrs. Recently IITians & other geographists, climatologists had proved that there was severe drought that prevailed around 2000BCE that caused large-scale migration of humans not just in/from IVC but all over the world. Actually the dravidians of IVC & aadhi-dravidians of south india were thorough with, familiar with the landscape of entire India & knew each other. Surely they were undertaking exploratory, adventurous expeditions throughout india & it's jungles. Just 1 month ago, some burial urns have been found in assam / North East India. Note that it was the ancient practice of tamils to bury their dead inside burial urns. So it clearly indicates that they were even roaming in North East India. That's why u can see rhino inscribed seals in IVC. Here is the link for that. Burial urns, jars found in NE India in Assam : www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/an-ancient-people-lost-to-time-mystery-of-giant-sandstone-jars-found-in-assam/ar-AAVRY4l?ocid=entnewsntp&cvid=611a7b6004394860a01f71bb79a0401b

[@guharup]

Like in every worship you have to invoke ganesha, in every discussion of history of india there has to be a long thamiz rant

[@jamjamg111]

@@guharup Unlike the north indians or the brahmins, we south indians don't invoke,worship ganesha in each and every worship of non-vedic south indian gods & goddesses. History of India should be written from south to north & not the other way round.

[@guharup]

@@jamjamg111 extended rant hinting of borderline racial/ethnic bias

[@yajnadevam]

Script has been deciphered kzbin.info/www/bejne/pJSng3eJgNFrq80

[@gandamallamadhukumar4995]

Indus valley civilization people migrated from elam and scripts and languages matches for both elamites and indus valley civilization

[@AbleLawrence]

Elamite period comes after the Indus decline and so it is probably impossible to hypothesise without more Elamite excavations.

[@HARRAPANBALL]

​@@descendedofrigvedicclans2216 😂 harrapan civilization

[@jaganr77]

The IVC language is ancient Tamil and already been deciphered by Mr Poorna Chandra Jeeva. However congrats to Dr Nisha Yadav for her tremendous work.

[@dheera8889]

It's ancient Japanese

[@maaz87]

Any link for his work ?

[@dheera8889]

@@maaz87 there's no such proof but you can find links of many propaganda articals and some hypothesis. No one yet knows what language harappans spoke, until some Rosetta stone is found. Though there is cultural as well as material continuity in punjab, sindh, gujarat, haryana and rajasthan. some says if you have cultural and material continuity, possibility of linguistic continuity too, by that logic they spoke pre Vedic indo aryan languages but some argue that they spoke proto Dravidian languages but no continuity in culture and material. Some argue they was proto munda speakers as there are some words of munda origin in Rig-Veda. Tamilanadu is too far from punjab to have linguistic continuity, also very low presence of Y haplogroup H1a.

[@maaz87]

@@dheera8889 Valid reason Cultural continuity but no lingual continuity. May be Tamil or Bruhui people also have the same culture of beads bangles Mattkas and necklaces. Tilak and Yoga Swastika , priest king is beard and bawled ,may be he is a Haji:) many chootia attempts of appropriation , Do you any book which is more accurate in your estimation

[@jaganr77]

@@dheera8889 Rakhigarhi Results announced in September 2018, and a paper published in Cell Magazine in 2019, show that the DNA did not include any traces of steppe ancestry, in line with the Aryan migration theory, which says that Indo-Aryans migrated to India from the steppes after the Harappan civilization had started to disintegrate.[50][51][52][53][54][55][56] The DNA of a male skeleton (classified as 'I4411') shows affinity with present-day South Indian tribal populations,[57] most notably the Irula people.[58] A total of 61 skeletons were found till 2016.

[@kishanraj8865]

Boy, if this is deciphered and it is related to Sanskrit, that will be last nail in the left historians of this country...

[@ajithmarvel]

You are not even fit for historical studies.

[@mlucasGrindstone]

Yes, proto-Sanskrit

[@aruchase]

Sanskrit by its name means Reformed and refined language. It differs from the archaic Rigvedic language by borrowing elements of grammer and root words from classical languages like Greek, Arabic , Persian , Tamil ( or Protodravidian ) and Munda languages. Sanskrit is an artificial language crafted from the admix of Rigvedic language with local dialects. The mix of Rigvedic languages with local dialects are collectively called Prakrit , the earlier older colloquium. Sanskrit is dated around 400 BC. It was originally a Sruti language, like the Rgvedic language , passed orally from generation to generation by the priestly class , accumulating the best of grammer , vocabulary and literature from wherever possible. It became Smriti , Written language , when it adopted the Naga or Nagari script from Present Maratta area some time in 2 nd century AD. The script is now called Deva Nagari. Though an artificial language , its refinement , beauty and richness is commendable and its originators must be quite a brilliant scholars.

[@vkumarsharma1]

Imagine if it turns otherwise

[@babahanuman83]

a: why? b: there is no left or right science. science is either politically neutral or propaganda.

[@ramputluri]

Google search/Indus era 8000 years old

[@jaimelicauco9104]

I can't understand his accent! Was he speaking in English or Tamil?

[@vanniking8183]

I can't understand her language

[@fartywood3917]

Its funny that, modern day "machine learning" algos fail to decipher a 5000 year old language. Does that mean our ancestors were advanced than us?

[@neodwija]

I think the only two words we have are Meluha and the name of the individual who was the interpreter from Meluha.

[@jogindersagar2629]

plz deciphered it ....its reallu imp for Indian people identity crisis, i dont when we will understand this what our Descendants or ancestors want to say to us. this is the most needful civilization which has need to deciphered

[@michaelrajamirtharaj]

According to linguistic scholar DR.D.N. PAVAANAR, people of IVC are actually migrants from KUMARY CONTINENT, submerged into indian ocean 1000s of years ago,& referred to in EPIC SILAPPATHIKARAM ( KUMARIKKOADUM KODUNGADAL KOLLA); AS SUCH THEIR LANGUAGE CAN ONLY BE DECIPHRED WITH PERSONS WHO ARE FAMILIAR WITH THOSE PEOPLE,THEIR CUSTOMS ,TRADITIONS,PRACTICES,GODS as well as their language!u can never find facts by simply looking at digitalised lines , far away from real symbols & the people who used those symbols!!!

[@krishnamohan1065]

😢brilliant explanation

[@prashantvanave8504]

❤

[@adwaitvedant3297]

Its ashwamedha/gomedha ritual...and not unicorn....its a bull only...listen to mrugendra vinod....on sangam talks...he has given proper logics....and reference to contemporary seals of different civilizations

[@aruchase]

Bull not cow. Nowhere cows are depicted. Even in so-called " Pashupati" seal nocow or domestic animals - only wild animals. When we have biased thinking we conjure up reasons that conforms and satisfies our beliefs.

[@cskcmp5009]

Aryans don't know how to build the buildings.They were poojari in temple.can a Brahmin build a building today

[@bobgiddings0]

The two speakers are entirely too confident of their ability to communicate with English speakers outside their native region. The introductory speaker has such a heavy accent that it renders English into gibberish. I'm sure he thinks he is doing fine. The main speaker is better, but both would benefit by closed caption translation into English. The subject matter is interesting to me, but is inaccessible without a text translation.

[@johnskuttysabu7915]

The language.is.different.dont.compare it.with.sanskrit.tamil.and.prakrit.and.gondi.it.has.no.relationship.with.south.indian.languages..

[@gbhargavi4744]

This fish symbol intiligence symbol of pandyas in South part of India

[@utubetruthteller]

Statistical study is less effective here

[@georgekaithayil4366]

this is thebest method to start a scientific approach to decode the language.

[@hsmishra8749]

No it is not yet proved that which language it was.....

[@abymon222]

Hope for a rosetta

[@sau002]

Very meticulous

[@AbhishekTiwari1111]

It is sanskrit indeed.

[@rajuswami991]

kzbin.info/door/6niXXOKzLh8dA-B4_Mux_g यदि जिज्ञासु हैं तो अवश्य मेरे दावे की जाँच उपरोक्त लिंक द्वारा कर सकते हो। राजर्षिराजूस्वामीजी, DYS-REC chanel