Sea Power - Unit Guide

Рет қаралды 21,522

Stealth17 Gaming

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 101

@acceptablecasualty5319 2 ай бұрын

Congratulations on being picked as an official Rep of Sea Power!

@dennislp3 Ай бұрын

I guess if he says something we don't like we can actually call him a shill now lol

@Zadlo14 2 ай бұрын

6:51 76mm is 3", not 4" 11:32 SS-N-3 has to be launched from the surface. This mast behind the turret is for radio mid-course guidance of these missiles. 12:55 In case of SET torpedos the number is very useful in the identification of the Soviet submarine. SET-40 is a 400mm torpedo, SET-53 is a 533mm torpedo and SET-65 is a 650mm torpedo. Only a few submarines have 400mm and 650mm torpedo tubes. 15:55 SS-N-2 missiles are both radar guided and heat seeking guided. It depends on the version of these missiles. 16:15 SA-N-5 are useless against anti-ship missiles. They can be used only against aircrafts. 19:00 SS-N-14A is only anti-submarine weapon. BUT SS-N-14B can be launched also against surface targets. You also forgot about one important thing. Any weapon having mid-course guidance can be guided by a player. Just click on the torpedo / missile and click where you want to send it before it finds the target.

@christopherchartier3017 2 ай бұрын

That whole mid course guidance function is probably what makes American Mk.46 wire guided torpedoes so deadly

@Zadlo14 2 ай бұрын

@@christopherchartier3017 But on the other side you can spare some anti-air missiles

@CecilioSprayetti 2 ай бұрын

Friendly AI/player feedback is definitely my biggest problem with the game. Friendly AI completely ignoring movement commands, changing speeds on their own, refusing to fire certain weapons when they 100% have the perfect conditions to do so, and so on. Friendly AI is more of a struggle than the actual enemies are. Hope thats resolved, really my only issues with the game so far besides performance

@bruces1g 2 ай бұрын

To me, this appears to be a modernized version of Harpoon, a DOS game from way back in 1989. Very similar time frame, ships, controls, etc. Which makes me very excited to try this as I had a ton of hours playing Harpoon. Can anyone offer a comparison between the two?

@kondor99999 2 ай бұрын

Just woke up and got it the moment it became available! Been waiting for this since 1983 lol. CMO is awesome but more like a professional tool than a game.

@CrazyChemistPL 2 ай бұрын

Apparently Echo, needs not only to surface to fire, but remain on the surface for the duration of missile's flight.

@mtbuvk4894 2 ай бұрын

😮 wouldn't want to be on that submarine haha

@Marx.Lenin.Stalin 2 ай бұрын

@@mtbuvk4894это лодка очень старая. Первое поколение лодок с ракетами.

@CrazyChemistPL 2 ай бұрын

@mtbuvk4894 Disposable submarine. Position, surface, fire missiles, guide missiles, abandon ship.

@johnvanantwerp2791 Ай бұрын

Doctrine was to always have at least 1 attack sub attached to a carried task group, FWIW.

@AZO2922 2 ай бұрын

Hope you guys will make the aerial refuelling in game later! With A6 + Tomcats that would be awesome.

@GiangNg320 2 ай бұрын

Funny that the soviet doesn’t have Kh-35 despite the devs allowing the Orel. As of now Harpoon are the deadliest threat in this game. Of course the Soviet have P-700 but it will be nice to see Harpoonski in this game.

@Zadlo14 2 ай бұрын

Kh-35 is de facto the post-Cold War weapon

@taiko1237 2 ай бұрын

The Orel is a hypothetical 'what if Project 1153 or a derivative was actually built in the late 1970s/early 1980s', not based off of the Kuznetsov or related later projects, so it doesn't have late Soviet-era tech. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_1153_Orel )

@ClevorBelmont 3 күн бұрын

Just got this. So excited.

@TechJoe1994 2 ай бұрын

Bought and downloaded it soon as it was available. Did a mission in the straight of Hormuz, killed everything except the airbase and only lost one helicopter with everything else intact. Quite enjoyed it. But I do get bad performance drops if ships in a formation are too close incase anyone has the same.

@Stealth17Gaming 2 ай бұрын

Yeah I've also noticed some pretty bad FPS issues.

@TechJoe1994 2 ай бұрын

@Stealth17Gaming yeah sure that'll get sorted. I mean I wanted the ships as close together as I could to protect the tankers better. But it really suffered. Spaced them out gradually and the performance got better and better. Bit of an odd thing really. But other than that it ran perfectly. I split off the 3rd ship to go hunting the land batteries whilst the missile cruiser and 2nd escorted the tankers. Had it on 100x speed in-between taking out missiles. But only 3x whilst having the ship fire it's 76mm gun on the air base. In the end gave up shooting at it 😂

@AZO2922 2 ай бұрын

@@Stealth17Gaming I also noticed heavy ram usage too. I have 32 and that was not enough and the game crashed.

@dadoogie 2 ай бұрын

I'm sure carrier groups do have a sub escort as standard.

@redgriffindiver7740 2 ай бұрын

Nobody would tell you if they did ;)

@AAhmou 2 ай бұрын

@@redgriffindiver7740 Military enthusiasts and historians would beg to differ.

@yester8039 2 ай бұрын

@@redgriffindiver7740 They do and they told us MANY MANY times lol

@Zadlo14 2 ай бұрын

They're not standard. And if there's any sub in the group then it's the only one.

@redgriffindiver7740 2 ай бұрын

@@yester8039 Three major deployments as an S-3 NFO and carrier TAO. If there was a sub with the battegroup nobody told me/us.

@andrewdixson8504 2 ай бұрын

Loving the game so far but I just wish you could que aircraft on the flight deck.

@Stealth17Gaming 2 ай бұрын

You can. You can give multiple launch orders

@andrewdixson8504 Ай бұрын

@@Stealth17Gaming I mean more of individual cat control. Like have cat 1 and 2 be used for the flight ops but have cat 3 have F14s sitting there waiting for launch orders but are already on the deck with engines on and ready to go.

@Stealth17Gaming Ай бұрын

@andrewdixson8504 I have a video on exactly that coming out today ;)

@redstar956 2 ай бұрын

Lovely. Are there any new units in the early access release?

@Stealth17Gaming 2 ай бұрын

They are adding units all the time. There are definitely units that I haven't shown on screen yet, or even seen myself.

@dragonslayer2107 2 ай бұрын

The Kirov Class definitely has a lot of missiles from the looks of it but I wonder if that is problematic should it get hit with an anti-ship missile. With that many missiles the chances of a secondary explosion, in my opinion, seem high. So, it seems high risk, high reward but it fits with the Soviet Naval Doctrine of trying to overwhelm the enemy's defense systems.

@pluemas 2 ай бұрын

Considering what happened to the Moskva, I think survivability was not a strong design parameter for soviet ships...

@Likeaworm 2 ай бұрын

💥💥💥

@syndragon7204 27 күн бұрын

can u do a video about the different fighter loadouts? still confusing to me to distinguish these nuances.

@redgriffindiver7740 2 ай бұрын

Good overview. Thanks!

@Ragefps Ай бұрын

Just remember radar can be detected around 3x the range that you can pick targets up. See it like a giant rotating searchlight

@billclarke5916 2 ай бұрын

Great info vid mate 👍

@Turfy2 Ай бұрын

hey having trouble finding assault rafts, or rafts in general in the editor, could you plz make a tutorial on them

@Stealth17Gaming Ай бұрын

They aren't in the game as far as I know

@Turfy2 Ай бұрын

@@Stealth17Gaming they're listed in the unit reference, but sice makin that comment ive noticed transport options for some helis too so maybe deploying infantry is a future feature or somthin

@Simo1000rr-y2n Ай бұрын

13k views and only 630 likes , this channel should get more likes . Viewers are very stingy nowadays

@SWBB1000 2 ай бұрын

I’m surprised, they didn’t add the Ski-Ramp carrier for the USSR, including the MiG-29/SU-33. Will the F-18, will be added in the game for later 80s scenario? Since Marines had a squadron in 83 n Navy in 85(aboard two aircraft carries) would help the anti-ship role. Anti-Air not much since it carried AIM-7 along with the AIM-9. But would be wonderful for SEAD missions.

@bigpoppa1234 2 ай бұрын

They invented (or consider the game an alt-universe) the Russian supercarrier instead.

@SWBB1000 2 ай бұрын

@ that sucks, would love to see the aircraft taking off from the ski-ramps.

@yester8039 2 ай бұрын

They entered service in the 90's

@SWBB1000 2 ай бұрын

@ was 1983 with Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 314 and Navy in 1985 on board their aircraft carriers Oh trust me I use google to see when/what squadron had them. Plenty of navy and marine squadron had the FA-18A in the mid 80s

@yester8039 2 ай бұрын

@@SWBB1000 i mean the kuznetsov russian aricraft carrier, its not in game cause entered service in the 90's

@2rhx 2 ай бұрын

Do you know Triassic Games uploaded this same video as "Sea Power Tutorial 2 Battlegroups"?

@alexspec1772 Ай бұрын

This is an amazing game.

@lordsylph414 2 ай бұрын

18:39 wait. didn't you say the Kirov *wasn't* a battlecruiser in an earlier video? :-D

@12thFan23 Ай бұрын

How do you get your carriers to auto populate static planes on deck? My carriers always spawn with an empty deck.

@Stealth17Gaming Ай бұрын

It's just the unit model. They might have changed it. You didn't install any mods did you?

@12thFan23 Ай бұрын

@@Stealth17Gaming I just installed some game scenarios.

@neiljopling4693 Ай бұрын

Do they have USSR SSK? Do they have limited battery and need to snorkel?

@Stealth17Gaming Ай бұрын

Yes and yes

@blezzleSR20 2 ай бұрын

how do towed decoys work?

@Marshal_Dunnik 2 ай бұрын

Downloading now!

@NCdtEski Ай бұрын

How is your flight deck populated like that

@Stealth17Gaming Ай бұрын

That's the regular model

@TyphoonBlast Ай бұрын

No iowas?

@theannihilator9167 2 ай бұрын

what is the "Ferry" loadout on some planes?

@Stealth17Gaming 2 ай бұрын

Basically as much fuel as possible to rebase them to a far away airfield.

@theannihilator9167 2 ай бұрын

@@Stealth17Gaming i guess most times its not needed in the actual gameplay...!?

@Kagayaki74 2 ай бұрын

@@theannihilator9167 but can be in the campaign, when that comes out

@MarkoDash 2 ай бұрын

a travel loadout, maximum fuel load with external tanks and such. not really any combat use.

@liquidgoose1518 2 ай бұрын

@@Kagayaki74 You can rebase aircraft already, there is an option to do that There isnt a single mission where its needed tho

@kineuhansen8629 2 ай бұрын

the prober turn for a russian aircraft carrier is aircraft carrying cruiser

@stastu6484 2 ай бұрын

Very dissapointed to see the price. I will not be buying until it is either reduced or the game gets more features to justify it. I'm sure that I'm not the only one who thinks this, lowering the price could get them many more customers.

@vito7428 2 ай бұрын

Or you could like you said,wait until it's more cooked. This is an early access release after all to help them gain some more development funds as opposed to having to go bankrupt and scrapping everything

@stastu6484 2 ай бұрын

@vito7428 the price should still match the reduced amount of features you're getting.

@user-dx6bv2pe1s 2 ай бұрын

I agree. The game has a solid foundation but is very buggy and needs playable tutorials. I think charging 40 pound to playtest the game is ridiculous. To me the game is disappointing in its current state and is vastly overpriced. Having said that I would recommend people try the game to make up their own minds.

@trickythefox9598 2 ай бұрын

The price is making me rather distressed

@benjaminburns4412 2 ай бұрын

Especially with stalker 2 coming out soon...

@trickythefox9598 2 ай бұрын

@@benjaminburns4412 Fun Fact! Buying Stalker 2 in Russia may be illegal, as it supports UAF

@pluemas 2 ай бұрын

@@trickythefox9598 you didn't need to promote it more, I'm already excited for it!

@christopherchartier3017 2 ай бұрын

@@trickythefox9598boo hoo Russians

@vito7428 2 ай бұрын

@@trickythefox9598I mean the creator behind the franchise was literally killed in battle with Russian forces

@OfficialUSKRprogram 2 ай бұрын

I really hope they add nuclear weapons, this isn't a kid's game, we're all adults here, we know what are nuclear weapons, let us use them. Maybe add a "nuclear war" checkmark when building a scenario. Nuclear warheads aren't that powerful especially in naval warfare, so battles might still devolve into naval gun battles, it's not "less fun" in fact it's much more entertaining to see big booms at the peak of a battle, and it's still not enough to sink a whole fleet.