I think it’s a difficult tool to give a short name to since the process its completing is actually quite complicated for the average shooter that only shoots factory ammunition to comprehend so conveying that much information in a short name is difficult. Good impactful descriptions would be an optimizer or unifier that would catch the attention of the targeted audience because I feel like the vast majority of people understand these terms. Name propositions - type 1 designs bullet seating optimizer/unifier - type 1 designs cartridge optimizer/unifier - type 1 designs ammunition optimizer/unifier - type 1 designs cartridge tuner Just a couple thoughts and suggestions thrown out there, if you have any feedback or your own thoughts feel free to reply. Love the podcast and the tool design, seems very useful. Jared
@jaredfager19012 ай бұрын
Also Type 1 designs ammo tuner/optimizer/unifier
@85ZERO172 ай бұрын
THE PUSH-PULL
@parkerkimber24462 ай бұрын
The Type 1 Unifier
@bobmcmillen45022 ай бұрын
We’ve had this conversation in your shop😂😂😂. I use a tuner to tune factory ammo. Since we spoke I figured out why you and others don’t believe in tuners. I believe It’s because the better the barrel the harder it is to make a difference. You’re always working w good barrels. In budget rifles, tuners are magic. Thanks for not kicking me out of your shop😅. I’ll send you a link to my KZbin when I get it finished. Keep up the good work.
@bobmcmillen45022 ай бұрын
That tool is very intriguing
@parkerkimber24462 ай бұрын
The Type 1 Persuader
@warddanger2 ай бұрын
Type 1 Depth Charge - Type 1 seatibietes
@swarmar30852 ай бұрын
Do you shoot the DTACS with the ring ? How do the work on game? Thank you
@justice13272 ай бұрын
Awesome!
@shoot2hunt2 ай бұрын
They are devastating.
@pabloco0912 ай бұрын
Hammerseater
@VincentStazenski2 ай бұрын
accu tune
@85ZERO172 ай бұрын
BE CURIOUS TO SEE ON AN AMP PRESS
@85ZERO172 ай бұрын
RIP NECK TENSION?
@Type1Designs2 ай бұрын
I was concerned about this as well when I first began testing the process. I've measured seating force with a hydraulic gauge before and after adjusting the seating depth in this way, and there is no measurable discrepancy. I have also recorded a LOT of velocity data; one of the tests I ran included a 20 shot group of factory loads straight out of the box, and a 20 shot group of loads that I partially "pulled," then reseated back to the original nominal depth. The results were identical nominal velocity, SD, and ES values. Those numbers WILL change if you change the seating depth/jump value. As the bullet "slides" in and out of the neck, there is no significant change to the hoop stresses present in the neck. When the bullet is initially seated in the neck, typically the hoop stresses are great enough to yield the brass and the diameter to which the material "springs back" to is set. Unless the bullet is forced out of concentricity within the neck, the load on the brass does not change. If you have conflicting data, I would love to hear it, but in my testing, I have not seen this to be a factor in any measurable way!