3. Finding Pure Strategy Nash Equilibrium in Finite Simultaneous-Move Games (Game Theory Playlist 3)

[@shinoon8801]

you are such a life save professor!! Thanks for the lesson!

[@sachim9332]

This is one of the best explanations I have seen- thank you!

[@captainlevi864]

Do u have exam at 10

[@thepotterheadful]

your lectures are a blessing

[@jackwong590]

very clear explanation

[@meixichen1514]

Thank you so much! Watching this before my midterm!

[@Jasmine-tt4nq]

Hocam zor bir şey sanmıştım ama sizin sayenizde anladım. Kolay açıklamanız için teşekkür ederim.

[@alanfeng2628]

WOW it is helpful! thanks! this concept has bothered me for two days

[@NIWUYUMarieGorette-g9q]

Wow! Thank you for your explanation. It's too clear , actually you're talented to.

[@maicylungatso8245]

Very clear and helpful 😊

[@rokeebatolamide1253]

Thank you for this comprehensive explanation

[@anasbenhachem5889]

that was verry helpful thanks a lot

[@Eda-gm7oy]

That was very clear and helped a lot in understanding the concept, thank you!

[@germaindoko3910]

You are the BEST.

[@paulrhyne4]

RIP Dr. John Forbes Nash and Alicia Nash 🙏❤

[@SIXCODM]

Your explanations are very clear and to the point. Thanks.

[@tomaszjankowski3878]

God bless you Selcuk

[@barsaslan8273]

Türk olarak gurur duydum hocam elinize sağlık

[@ipsitadutta7634]

Thank you very much Sir ❤ (From India)

[@Bass_Fishing_101]

finally, a large game!

[@xastgamogaming8104]

Finally I understood, thanks!!!!

[@emptyxnes]

Does Nash equilibrium only apply to simultaneous game? Can it also apply to sequential? Or if its sequential, it becomes a cooperative game?

[@beataszendrey786]

Hi! Is it sensible to rank the Nash e.s? Like which one is the best one, and the worst common solution.

[@danielberndsen490]

Great, Thanks!!

[@salmaabdelwahab549]

AWESOME JOB, Thank you so much!

[@konekosamvs3264]

Thank you this was an awesome video!

[@kerevizseverim8661]

you are awesome, çok teşekkür ederim.

[@jeeenniie]

I can’t thank you enough!

[@beataszendrey786]

Hi! Thank you for the great explanaiton! A question: can we still call it dominant strategy if only one single cell of a row (out of four) has the highest number? Or only if ALL numbers of a row contains the highest figures?

[@mertyildirir]

I guess we can call it a strictly dominant strategy only if all payoffs(numbers) of a row are higher than the other rows.

[@beataszendrey786]

@@mertyildirir yes, I think so too, thank you very much!!!

[@mertyildirir]

@@beataszendrey786 you're welcome :))

[@channingphil186]

I think, not a row, but a total plane

[@beataszendrey786]

@@channingphil186 a row - or a column it can be either

[@vincenarh8317]

That is helpful. Thank you

[@vincenarh8317]

Do you have any video on dominated strategies in 3 player games? I would be grateful to have a look

[@charitymbatudde7733]

Thank you

[@devarshiraval1006]

Hello, for the game with X,Y,Z - ABCD , what would the focal point be? appreciate it if you get back to me asap!

[@ahumuzadoreen7475]

Thank alot

[@xuweiqin8237]

that is helpful, thank you sir

[@Mdroni-bw4zx]

Thank u so much

[@erenmetu]

Hocam Türk oldugunuzu görünce cok sasirdim. Cok tesekkurler. Arcaba find mixed nash eq. Sorulariyla ilgili videonuz da var mi. Pure olani sayenizde anladim