Why are historians working so hard to excuse Henry's actions? Henry pursued Anne, Anne wanted nothing to do with Henry. Henry forced Anne to marry him. When he got tired of her, he killed her, and while she was being killed he got engaged to Jane. It's time to stop excusing Henry and place the blame for the divorces, executions, murders, slaughter, and abuse, where it belongs on Henry.
@louisewilson20444 жыл бұрын
Starkey doesn't. He clearly states that no one could convince Henry of anything. It was Henry's decision.
@ButtonsCasey4 жыл бұрын
I thought most people knew Henry was responsible for what happened in his life. I am also so happy to see someone else, that see's the huge possibility ( I am leaning towards it) that Henry forced himself on Anne, and it had little to do with her playing hard to get. I don't believe she was that ambitious, evil woman who wanted to be Queen.
@scallen38414 жыл бұрын
Wasn't it Anne's father her pushed this ?
@louisewilson20444 жыл бұрын
Technically Anne's family weren't in a position to refuse him. Anne was courting Henry Percy and the King had Wolsey look into ending that courtship claiming that Percy was betrothed to another. The King did a lot remove obstacles to have Anne as a mistress but Anne still refused him at great risk to herself and her family.
@scallen38414 жыл бұрын
@@louisewilson2044 Yep still damaged goods
@elisabethblackwood39214 жыл бұрын
Henry didn't deserve any of the amazing women he married. They were all too good for him.
@uwumarii4 жыл бұрын
They are definitely out of his league. He's a disgusting excuse for a human
@xcrystalx6254 жыл бұрын
Except Catherine Howard🤷♀️
@scarletpimpernelagain91244 жыл бұрын
C L why catherine Howard? She was just a young girl when she married an old man - to further her families ambitions.
@puppetguy87264 жыл бұрын
I think Anne and Henry deserved eachother, other than that I agree
@ketreenawilliams13204 жыл бұрын
It's sad that Catherine of Aragon could have been so much more other than just chasing Henry's affections.
@coreyboggs20114 жыл бұрын
He literally warned Jane Seymour not to interfere in politics and reminded her of the "fates of other queens" that meddled in his affairs. I think Henry allowed and wanted it all to happen and didn’t care how it happened.
@glowinggold94884 жыл бұрын
truly horribel man...
@saraleonoramanriquez21684 жыл бұрын
Totally right
@rebekahhakeber50934 жыл бұрын
Someone watched the Tudors- And assumed they entire script is word for word 🤣
@Cissy2cute4 жыл бұрын
He frightened Katherine Parr as well, and also at one point became infuriated with Jane Seymour because she was against the destruction of the monasteries.
@glowinggold94884 жыл бұрын
@@Cissy2cute This man seemed to demand everyone agree with him. Narcissist to the hilt. Im not sure he loved anyone.... ever except him mom
@kathys12854 жыл бұрын
She was murdered point blank and Henry was a narcissist she was domed the moment he saw her
@waterotter36254 жыл бұрын
If it were me, I might have accidentally cut my face a little to reduce my beauty.
@rhondathompson69424 жыл бұрын
@@waterotter3625 i would of got on a boat and sailed off to another land and hide from him for ever
@edennis32024 жыл бұрын
@@waterotter3625 She wasn't all that attractive in the first place, by the most generous contemporary accounts. I can't help thinking that she could have tried harder to make herself less attractive to Henry. There are a lot of ways to do that, usually without resorting to permanent disfigurement. If I wear lemon yellow, for example, my face turns bright yellow, too. The juice from berries can imitate a big bruise, and it won't rub off if someone touches it. Applied around the eyes, it makes you look ill. Ditto whitening on the lips. The whitener they used wasn't very healthy, but it was healthier than decapitation. Yellow teeth. Bad breath. The list is practically endless.
@glowinggold94884 жыл бұрын
@@edennis3202 Hmmmmm.. Not good looking by whos estimation?From what i read back then they were really big into the blonde... fair skin ideal. She was Not that. . That does not mean she was not a beauty in her own right.From what i heard she was quite beguiling and charming.. I think she had black hair that was very long and alluring eyes. She sounds quite enchanting.
@someone31874 жыл бұрын
This is all easy to say in hindsight. Nobody would have thought he would behead her. Anne certainly wouldn't have married him had she known. Let's not forget he wrote so many love letters and seemed genuinely smitten by her.
@judithboltz73184 жыл бұрын
King henry was a spoiled brat from the minute he was born.
@sophiegathercole70254 жыл бұрын
Judith Boltz Well actually he was ignored most of his childhood and was only paid any attention when his older brother died. It was a head injury that turned him into a wife killing brat.
@scallen38414 жыл бұрын
He was born into royalty , people today would act the same
@glowinggold94884 жыл бұрын
@@sophiegathercole7025 I think he was a brat. The injury made him into a monster brat.
@philliphamilton35914 жыл бұрын
Not a brat....a monster!
@cherylrawlings88754 жыл бұрын
Historically he was said to be a good King up until the fall fro his horse. It would seem that a concussion changed his personality drastically! Sad
@shawnmatthews95944 жыл бұрын
None of it is possible without the consent of Henry. Henry gets what he wants
@erikalulea36084 жыл бұрын
exactly
@AshleyLebedev4 жыл бұрын
Bingo
@sueroberts61934 жыл бұрын
Like Royals from every century. 😳
@brianfinnegan6644 жыл бұрын
It's a man's world
@lisaholden71243 жыл бұрын
What if a handful or so were more loyal to her instead? What if she did in fact have a plan to escape bc she knew how hot head he was and how powerful his members loyal to him were. 3rd miscarriage... maybe they wanted her out of pic to bring new wife in to bear a child for the heir. She knew her days were being numbered and a coup would be put in place to bring her to public death. 🤷♀️ who know...
@veronicashertoine18104 жыл бұрын
The fact that Anne's father got her into that mess and thwn turned on her and his son. What a bad parent
@morganmarsh12764 жыл бұрын
just horrible. what a power hungry disgrace. poor kids. ):
@Cissy2cute4 жыл бұрын
@@morganmarsh1276 You cannot expect the mores of yesterday can be compared to those of today.
@pamelaoliver84424 жыл бұрын
Stop reading Phillipa Gregory. There is NO evidence to back that claim up. Contemporary evidence says the Duke of Norfolk wept as he read Anne's sentence. She's a great fiction writer, but please refer to historians like Eric Ives and Alison Weir for more factual information
@oliveoil76423 жыл бұрын
Children were expendable back then how sad
@joshuaowens4011 Жыл бұрын
not true
@whiskeytangofoxtrot25684 жыл бұрын
Cromwell was himself later beheaded by the king.
@LaPetiteBoulin4 жыл бұрын
Its not a fact that Cromwell was the one behind the conspiracy. Most think Henry told him to do it because he didn't want another situation like he had with Catherine of Aragon. I do think Cromwell picked the men he charged with her since their deaths bettered his pockets.
@jophoenix39194 жыл бұрын
AS HE WELL DESERVED!!
@anastasiaisabella73544 жыл бұрын
Yes he was ! That's Karma
@YvetteArby4 жыл бұрын
Anastasia Isabella: Yes! Karma come home to roost on him!!
@karenvalentine73204 жыл бұрын
Good, say I. He was the most brutal & unscrupulous man from the Tudor era. No one deserved it more. Cromwell the coward, who had other people killed at will, wrote Henry a letter from the Tower, begging him for mercy.
@michaeljensen46504 жыл бұрын
Anne Boleyn's father sacrificed his daughter to secure his own position and feed his ambition. How tragic. There are no angels in this story. Anne, Henry and Cromwell were all deeply fearful, greedy, power-hungry and selfish.
@EJayMD-114 жыл бұрын
Sounds like the men of that era
@michaeljensen46504 жыл бұрын
@@EJayMD-11 Yes and their mothers too.
@juanitarichards10744 жыл бұрын
None of them would have had any choice once the king set his sites on Anne. I don't think he did throw her in the kings way. His daughter Mary became an outcast from the family for disgracing them with her affair with the king. Nobody in the family would help her when her first husband died and she was left a young widow with 2 children, living in dire poverty. Anne spoke to the king and he forced her father to give her an allowance, he did it only grudgingly because the king ordered him to. Then when she remarried a poor soldier she was cut off from the royal family and all her kith and kin. She never saw Anne or the king again. Anne had learned from Mary's mistake and refused to be the kings mistress. In the very beginning she knew if she did it would prevent her ever making an honourable marriage. She was hoping the king would give up and leave her alone if she ignored his letters and sent back his gifts. Instead it had the opposite effect and she was trapped. However she did come to love Henry deeply and sincerely ("It broke my heart to see you loved others"). So no, her ftaher would not have been happy if she had become the kings mistress as quickly and easily as Mary had done. And because of her affairs at the French court while waiting on the new French queen, Henry's sister, she was sent home in disgrace. Her father was very angry with her and never forgave her.
@firewaterbydesign4 жыл бұрын
He sacrificed both a son and a daughter for his own gain. Her brother was also executed.
@juanitarichards10744 жыл бұрын
@@firewaterbydesign Do you think he had any choice in the matter? The whole court was terrified they'd be next. Anne's secretary was so afraid he left court...........he was forced to return and be examined but nothing was found against him. They examined some but let them go. They imprisoned another 2 - Wyatt was one if them, but Cromwell freed him after the executions were over. This was to make it look like a fair trial and to underline the seeming guilt of the others.
@nikitaheredia4164 жыл бұрын
Anne only lost the baby due to shock because Henry was a nob. Corruption is the end of relationships, her own father betrayed her.
@Sweetlyfe3 жыл бұрын
Yeah and him nearly getting killed in the jousting accident, I wonder if he became diabetic and that’s why the wound never healed, or most likely because they didn’t have antibiotics until the 20th century, probably cellulitis where wound healing even today is virtually impossible as the legs become ulcerated, they didn’t understand about sterilisation then.
@CocoCece083 жыл бұрын
I always thought it was Karma from how she treated Catherine of Aragon's death.
@gullwingstorm8573 жыл бұрын
Henry was Kell positive, which meant he could only have one living baby with each woman. All other attempts result in miscarriage or stillbirth. He probably also suffered with McLeod Syndrome, which is unique to Kell positive people, and would explain his terrible behaviour as he got older.
@glen73187 ай бұрын
@@gullwingstorm857 no real evidence to prove this. He had more than one living baby with Kat of Aragon.
@gullwingstorm8577 ай бұрын
@@glen7318 Lol! She gave birth to six babies and only Bloody Mary survived.
@72Yonatan4 жыл бұрын
Thomas Cromwell wasn't a good person. Plotting and scheming until he was undone himself.
@karenvalentine73204 жыл бұрын
Henry had angrily struck him during a dispute, & Cromwell went back to his home & spent days plotting how to get rid of Anne, believing this would get him back in the king's favor. He even later admitted that he had “set himself to devise and conspire the affair” of Anne’s downfall. Which, to me, means he made the whole thing up.
@karmathephoenix24744 жыл бұрын
I hated to see Cromwell die, but karma always catches up to you. Henry needed Cromwell. It was the Boleyns who assisted Cromwell in his rise to prominence. He lost sight of that, and could have turned the whole situation around for Anne. It would not have been the best for Anne, but would have saved her life, perhaps.
@januarysson56334 жыл бұрын
Karma & The Phoenix He differed with Anne on what should happen with the dissolved monasteries and that was a factor in his turning against Anne.
@evaleeturner44144 ай бұрын
Wrong He had so many ideas and plans for helping the poor he feed 200 people outside his home everyday , He lived in a time where unpleasant things were done everyday , But he wanted so much for the people mimnuin wage heath plans etc he wanted then what took hundreds of years to get done people working under Victoria rain an didn't make enough money for a small place to live they rented for a few hours
@allygaffney9624 жыл бұрын
Cromwell recognized annes power with the king and feared it. She brought down Woolsey, his original boss. Eventually he must have worried when will she turn on him. She also disagreed with how the dissolution of monasteries was being carried out, swift and aggressively. He stood to gain from their destruction.
@mcaskey3584 жыл бұрын
None of that was Anne. It was 100% Henry. It's sad that she gets blamed for all of Henry's cruelty and evil acts.
@uofc574 жыл бұрын
“This time, the baby would have been a boy” - that’s a weird way of wording it - the baby WAS a boy, but he was stillborn
@carlv13794 жыл бұрын
Historian activism to further an agenda.
@catwoman90624 жыл бұрын
The pregnancy was about 5 months along, so it was a miscarriage opposed to a stillborn child. But it was already obvious that this would have been a boy at full term.
@mcaskey3584 жыл бұрын
I agree, it should have been, "This time, the fetus would have been a boy." its much more accurate.
@ossia17084 жыл бұрын
Wait how is it a weird way of wording it? What they mean is that nothing would’ve happened to Anne because if the baby boy was born it would’ve saved her from being beheaded.
@gardyloo30934 жыл бұрын
I agree. The baby WAS a boy.
@biancachristie4 жыл бұрын
Henry’s famous leg injury actually dated back to an old jousting accident in 1527. When he had what would be his last jousting accident, his legs were crushed under his horse and the wound, which had already given him a limp, reopened and ulcerated, so he probably had some internal injury that had never properly healed. Cromwell and Anne clashed over many things, but Anne was a very outspoken person with a temper that matched Henry’s and she gave as good as she got. Anne clashed with *everyone*. And she and Cromwell were sometimes allies-he did more to enable her to marry the king than anyone else, so even though he blamed her for Wolsey’s downfall, Cromwell also convinced her ex boyfriend Harry Percy to relinquish his claim that they were “precontracted,” which constituted legal marriage at the time, and he also tried to get Catherine of Aragon to give up her claims on Henry. Anne’s execution was not necessarily Cromwell’s first choice as a means of freeing Henry of his marriage to her. It was not unheard of at all for Royal marriages to be dissolved when viable offspring proved impossible. But Anne would never have gone down without a fight to join a posh convent as an abbess, which was the only socially and culturally acceptable position for an anointed queen and Marquess, at a time and place where rank was essential to one’s identity. Plus she had a child with a legitimate claim to the throne, and Elizabeth had to be put out of the line of succession. Henry, Cromwell, and Anne boxed themselves into that corner. And Henry’s increasingly precarious health might have resulted in Anne as regent and Queen Mum, and she would have eventually killed Cromwell if that happened, as she saw Cromwell’s refusal to forsake Mary Tudor (which he wouldn’t do because she was a possible heir herself, and the kingdom needed the illusion of stability she provided, and also because keeping Mary close was the only way to keep the French, the Holy Roman/Spanish Emperor, and the old nobility from invading England and/or staging a coup) as treasonous-it was her or him, and Cromwell got very lucky when Anne lost her son-had the child lived, Anne would have consolidated her position, and she would have killed him first. Henry, Cromwell, and Anne boxed themselves in. Cromwell tried to play both sides of the fence, and it eventually killed him. A seasoned player like Cromwell knew that the Tudors killed their courtiers, and Anne was as Tudor albeit by marriage as anyone born into the family-almost more Tudor than the blood Tutors, as smart, ambitious, and ruthless as any of them. Court politics were literally cutthroat. If anyone in that situation deserved the most shame, it was Anne’s father, who flung his children into the court for his own gain. He gave Anne’s sister Mary as a mistress first to King Francois, when the Boleyns were still at the French court, and then to Henry when the family came home to England. He expected the same of Anne, but she played her hand with astonishing skill. Still, those girls both worked for him on their backs and he collected the money and titles. His son George did almost as much. What kind of a man could do that? He saved his own skin by allowing both Anne and George to be sacrificed, since George was also executed when Anne was found guilty.
@KareBear-th6vq4 жыл бұрын
1:10 But Henry was unconscious at this point.....why y'all got him screaming???? He was unconscious for nearly 2 hours, his courtiers and doctors thought he was fatally injured until he finally woke up.
@parisLuvsdolls4 жыл бұрын
Men in those days did the same shady thing to Marie Antoinette.
@Sweetlyfe3 жыл бұрын
They still do it, it’s obscene
@glen73187 ай бұрын
huh?
@carlv13794 жыл бұрын
For Tudor information, see anything Claire Ridgway has done, or sift through youngster Claudia Boleyn's KZbin musings to find a few meticulously crafted videos.
@mcaskey3584 жыл бұрын
Her videos have absolutely changed my entire view on this period of time. The sad part is, I can't watch the Tudors anymore without being annoyed. :)
@vloggythevlogger52155 ай бұрын
I love Claire!
@Nick-kz6dg4 жыл бұрын
"These are the original documents" Casually flips through near-500 year old book with her grubby fingers and no gloves.
@jitaamesuluma97304 жыл бұрын
the fingers do not look filthy to me , the tudors deserve to be forgotten , apart from his sisters who did no wrong i know of now , i descend from the stewarts , so there for , Margaret tudor was my many times great grandmother , BUT , i am not proud of having henr as my great grand uncle one bit
@christiandoodles4 жыл бұрын
History Chanel's documentary on this was more placing the blame on one guy ...
@mangot5894 жыл бұрын
Chinomso I Plus the oil from fingers helps keep the pages supple, especially if they’re vellum. I’m sure she knows what’s she’s doing, she is a curator. It’s funny what people say, like she doesn’t.
@mangot5894 жыл бұрын
Lisa Smith Actually, that IS how the Stuart’s used to spell it, before the thrones merged. Just sayin’.
@maxisussex4 жыл бұрын
@@historicalfashionpassion That and the fact the Tudors changed the course of English history, from the establishment of the Church of England to the establishment of the first colony in Virginia.
@user-tl8oj4tv1g4 жыл бұрын
Btw, today is the birthday of Anna of Kleve, another wife of Henry.
@shyfly8254 жыл бұрын
I don’t think they know exactly when her birthday actually was but today is one of the days suspected to be her birthday. June 28 is another day they suspect which is also Henry VIII birthday
@user-tl8oj4tv1g4 жыл бұрын
@@shyfly825 Yes, it's the date you find in most books.
@shyfly8254 жыл бұрын
P Very true, I believe it is stated that it is the more probable date of her birth
@mariagallian80574 жыл бұрын
At least she kept her head and was called "sister" by Henry.
@shyfly8254 жыл бұрын
Maria Gallian Also true and she outlived Henry
@jophoenix39194 жыл бұрын
ANNE BOLEYN WILL REMAIN IN HISTORY AS A INTELLIGENT AND BRAVE WOMAN WHO'S DAUGHTER WAS THE GREATEST QUEEN ENGLAND EVER HAD!
@lillyc92834 жыл бұрын
More like HERstory!!!
@lillyc92834 жыл бұрын
The Funny Side Up really? I don’t see anything indicating that. She was actually a “biblical feminist” and definitely made a change in her society by being one. Spain was actually the first to being slaves to the New World. She was very brave to even let the future know that she was a feminist and wanted equality through all men and women. Obviously the second statement is technically an opinion, but Elizabeth was the first female ruler that didn’t get the nickname of Bloody Mary.
@mcaskey3584 жыл бұрын
@The Funny Side Up How so?
@mcaskey3584 жыл бұрын
@@lillyc9283 And Rome had slaves before, in fact most nations had slavery of some kind or another at some point in their history. But yeah, i have no idea how a woman, who wasn't even allowed the freedom to pick her own husband, in a time when they were debating if women even had souls, could create slavery, all on her own?
@lillyc92834 жыл бұрын
M Caskey I feel that. I’m just speaking for my country (America) and the UK. My favorite subject is actually history (specifically the UK, USA, and other European countries)
@FreeSpirit474 жыл бұрын
Ironic. Since Henry will always be known as a foul tempered narcissist. Anne is remembered as one of Henrys victims who was the mother of a queen.
@juanitarichards10744 жыл бұрын
Cromwell was a hypocrite because he also turned his back on Wolsey. When it came down to his career or his loyalty to Wolsey, he chose his career. Also there are signs that Henry had a tyrannical streak even from a young age. One of his first deeds on becoming king was to have his fathers unpopular ministers and tax collectors, Empson and Dudley executed. Never mind that they were just doing their jobs that the previous king had ordered them to do. This is one of the ways the new king gained the popularity of the people. That ruthless streak was always there and got worse as he became more sanctimonious and thought he WAS God and that whatever he desired God wanted for him. Never mind morals and ethics. The great adulterer/ so pious.......and a murderer and child abuser to boot. A huge hypocrite.....he knew the charges against Anne were impossible.
@glowinggold94884 жыл бұрын
good point... He got some of this from his dad.
@neilbuckley16134 жыл бұрын
@@glowinggold9488 He actually was more like his maternal grandfather both physically and in personality, the ruthless King Edward IV who executed his own brother the Duke of Clarence.
@glowinggold94884 жыл бұрын
I think that Henrys grandfather,,, on his dads side.... did not seem to have s strong clear moral compass. He impregnated a 12 or 13 year old girl. I dont care if it was accepted at the time... i suspect at some level those that do such things know its wrong. Children are innocent of thier parents crimes but it still has a way of clutching at thier heels and effecting them. Henry seem to have a lust problem... and it was his undoing.
@juanitarichards10744 жыл бұрын
@@glowinggold9488 There was no such thing as childhood in those days. Poor children worked like slaves, rich and royal were married off young and expected to take on adult duties. Young princes were expected to entertain foreign ambassadors in style, train for war and to defend their country one day.......girls learned how to run households and estates......childhood is a relatively modern invention.
@glen73187 ай бұрын
@@glowinggold9488 what are you on about?
@Thursdaysindecember4 жыл бұрын
So much pride and a toxic mixture of insecurity and power made Henry a puppet by other to manipulate to throw away Anne. This saddens and sickens me immensely.
@angelartamesia24 жыл бұрын
Anne of Cleves was the smartest out of all of Henry's wives
@thedativecase97334 жыл бұрын
Yes. And the luckiest.
@pamelaoliver84424 жыл бұрын
Idk. Katherine Parr was a published author and managed to save her own skin when she got a little too outspoken..
@graceplaysxrb49624 жыл бұрын
kathrine was the smartest
@KatTheScribe4 жыл бұрын
Not sure we know exactly what prompted it all, but I think the 'evidence' of Anne's 'guilt' was convenient to both Henry VIII and Cromwell. Henry was an immature, selfish punk and, at this point anyway, Cromwell worked him well.
@juliie0074 жыл бұрын
The Tudor series did a great job revealing the conspiracy against Anne Boleyn.
@dkcy57484 жыл бұрын
Head injury & leg wound,.definitely changed his personality
@dkcy57484 жыл бұрын
@strawberry_shortcake4life no he wasn't as it was never expected for him to be king
@christistratton4 жыл бұрын
The title of this is "Shocking Papers Prove Anne Boleyn Conspiracy".. but you never reveal the contents of said papers, only that there are some. This told me nothing more than any other content on the subject, and therefore, the "shocking" was no more than a fizzle.
@christistratton4 жыл бұрын
@Peter Lorimer I see. I used to have a Smithsonian Magazine subscription, it was excellent .
@Punnery4 жыл бұрын
These days there's a lot of confusion about the word "proof." People (or headlines) will claim something to be proof, when in fact it's merely a piece of evidence. To me the choice of the emotive words "shocking" and "conspiracy" in particular make me suspect their line of reasoning.
@thedativecase97334 жыл бұрын
This is part of a much longer BBC documentary.
@christistratton4 жыл бұрын
@@thedativecase9733 OH.. I c.. it was a snippet.. thank you so much.. perhaps i can find the entire somewhere
@christistratton4 жыл бұрын
@@MSBowen-pk6ww Someone said that this was a short bit because there was a longer video which had all the information in it. This was essentially a "teaser trailer".
@crazydougfam4 жыл бұрын
However that document was based on testimony from the minstrel and others. Tbh I think Cromwell was dealt a lucky hand and played it cruelly!
@phishENchimps4 жыл бұрын
Shhh, don't do all the proper reporting. you'll make them look biased
@juanitarichards10744 жыл бұрын
I believe he wouldn't have dared carry out such an audacious plot unless it was on the kings orders.
@patriciastaton61824 жыл бұрын
just horrific how you treat loved ones 😭
@QuantumMechanic_884 жыл бұрын
It's called the "royal family" .
@cassievanbrunt77914 жыл бұрын
I dont think loved ones is the correct term for the period, it's more like progeny. Science project, or futures (in stock market terms).
@gypsysummer40083 жыл бұрын
Anyone who has dealt with brain injury patients/family will know he has classic signs of this after his jousting accident ,where he was unconscious for a long time. personality change/paranoia/ aggression/irritability etc. Why is this rarely ever mentioned?
@Hayata_dair_hersey952 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing!
@conlaiarla4 жыл бұрын
Henry the truth about Anglicanism.
@stephallan25434 жыл бұрын
How SAD 😢. However, the Good News is that LIARS are not Allowed in Heaven.
@glen73187 ай бұрын
what are you on about? the place must be empty then
@bothewolf34664 жыл бұрын
I knew this because of Clair Ridgway's channel. XD
@mcaskey3584 жыл бұрын
I love her channel. She's very well sourced and informed. It's completely changed my view on this period in history.
@beth79354 жыл бұрын
@@mcaskey358 Yeah, hearing the contemporary sources is amazing!
@bothewolf34664 жыл бұрын
@@mcaskey358 It just showed me the political machinations and intrigue today are about the same as have always been going on since the dawn of time, to today. Politics and coveting of power never changes.
@karmathephoenix24744 жыл бұрын
Anne Boleyn did give Henry an heir, Elizabeth. Elizabeth I, although she never married, led her country into the Golden Years of great prosperity. She ruled for 40 years, unlike her sister Mary I who was renown for executions, earning the nickname: Bloody Mary. She died leaving England bankrupt and with no heir. None of Henry's children had heirs, hmmm? I'm almost certain he and his family had a curse on them. Something or someone did not want the Tudors to be successful or happy on the throne.
@chelseajacob5734 жыл бұрын
The Tuddors were never supposed to be on the throne. Henry vii's grandmother engaged in alot of dirty work to get her son (Henry viii's father)on the throne. That most likely had alot to do with it. Not so much a curse but a natural consequence of the action of the Tudors. Being henry, his parents and his grandparents
@Mark-Smeaton2 жыл бұрын
Princess Diana was descended from the Boleyn's via Anne's sister Mary. (Charles is too but I find Diana's link to Anne far more fascinating lol).
@alicejohnson87512 жыл бұрын
Elizabeth killed nearly as many Catholics as Mary killed protestants. Elizabeth was no saint.
@glen73187 ай бұрын
@@Mark-Smeaton No such person
@barbaradenicomedia1144 жыл бұрын
Henry executed in cold blood to Thomas More, someone with far more dignity and honor than Anne Boleyn had ever dreamed of aspiring to, who was his teacher, faithful chancellor, and friend, so if Henry had not scruples had no qualms about executing him, much less someone as daring as Anne Boleyn.
@mcaskey3584 жыл бұрын
Check out the channel, "The Anne Boleyn Files and Tudor Society" I think you'll find your opinion of Anne is a bit off.
@harryfineberg50754 жыл бұрын
He burned protestants at the stake and thought he was doing them a good turn. A catholic fanatic beneath all the piety and scholarship
@Cissy2cute4 жыл бұрын
Sadly in Henry's declining years he much regretted ordering More's execution and too late realized what a tremendous friend More had been.
@Skyblue-fw5rm3 жыл бұрын
And Henry began suppressing monasteries for plundering. I like Thomas More but I respect your different opinion.
@courag14 жыл бұрын
The way women were supposed to dress in many centuries, it is amazing how hard it was for women to carry children. Not so with common-folk. Women have had the short-end of the stick frequently. The toxic medicines of the day also may have prevented a healthy pregnancy due to Henry's health also.
@yvonneb23274 жыл бұрын
I think you are very close to the truth Re toxic medicines .
@gullwingstorm8573 жыл бұрын
Henry was Kell positive, which meant he could only have one living baby with each woman. All other attempts result in miscarriage or stillbirth. He probably also suffered with McLeod Syndrome, which is unique to Kell positive people, and would explain his terrible behaviour as he got older.
@juanitarichards10744 жыл бұрын
Cromwell would not have dared dream up such an audacious plot unless the king ordered him to. Nobody did anything without Henry knowing..........he wanted rid of Anne to marry Jane and have an heir, and he didn't want to wait 7 years like he had to get rid of Katherine of Aragon. He didn't want Anne and her family fighting her corner so he destroyed them all - all of Anne's potential supporters. There was no need to execute Anne as the marriage was annulled days before her execution. Cranmer used the grounds that Henry had had an affair with her sister which put them within illicit degrees of affinity. They tried first of all to make Henry Percy swear there was a precontract between him and Anne, which would have allowed for a quick annulment, but Percy swore 3 times before the clergy and on the Sacrament that they had never been precontracted. I believe him. He could have saved Anne's life if he had lied for her but he would not. Far too much was made of their one time flirtation, but Anne had many admirers at that time and kept them all at a distance, including poet Wyatt. And this was all before the king set his cap for her.
@karenvalentine73204 жыл бұрын
Actually, I believe Percy was lying, because he & Anne had made a marriage vow to each other that was overheard by several witnesses. In those days, that was as good as being married. I think he was afraid of his own skin if he admitted it for the trial, knowing that the King's & Cromwell's will was that Anne had to die. Percy was very ill & collapsed after the death verdict on Anne. A year later, he was dead at age 35.
@dewianjani80214 жыл бұрын
God bless Queen Elizabeth I
@Brahmdagh4 жыл бұрын
Heartbreaking.
@hannahcane6454 жыл бұрын
You'll actually find Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn did give the King sons who either were miscarried or still born- it was God's will for then not to have a son.
@Meow_Zedong_19493 жыл бұрын
The Tudors seemed to have trouble with producing healthy sons with Henry VIII being the only Tudor prince to live beyond 20. His older brother Arthur, his illegitimate son Henry Fitzroy and his heir Edward VI all died in their teens along with the many stillbirths and miscarriages among Catherine of Aragon and Anne Boleyn. Perhaps Richard III cursed the Tudor dynasty with his last breath.
@ckallen15464 жыл бұрын
Let’s not be mellow dramatic. Anne Boleyn was a well educated girl & young woman. Her father, mother, and uncle were people of means and power. With a lot of political allies. And Anne had witnessed what became of the king’s lovers (including her own younger sister). The king’s grandmother had done a lot of fancy footwork to get Henry’s father on the throne. No doubt Henry was aware (at the least) of that. And what it would take for him to hold onto his crown. Anne Boleyn was no innocent servant girl or milk maid...or female of a minor or impoverished house. It’s sad, what happened to her. And wrong. But she went in with eyes wide open. And could have retreated as easily as her younger sister (or Bessie Blount). But didn’t. And can be honored for that.
@stephenenders20664 жыл бұрын
The Smithsonian doesn't have a good track record on being upfront enough to be able to judge conspiracies lol
@kimbyrd22984 жыл бұрын
Mary who was Anne's sister was Henry's mistress.
@thedativecase97334 жыл бұрын
Exactly. That's why Anne didn't deliver the goods until she knew she had Henry hooked. She saw the way he had discarded her sister when he was tired of her.
@glen73187 ай бұрын
we know
@chykim14 жыл бұрын
Had Anne had a son, cromwell wouldn't have been able to touch her, this whole farce would've never taken place.
@glen73187 ай бұрын
but she didnt.
@margo33674 жыл бұрын
I've read two of Hilary Mantel's books about Thomas Cromwell. Just starting on the third (of the trilogy). Fascinating story.
@Saurischian4 жыл бұрын
Which has been your favorite?
@ericloscheider74334 жыл бұрын
Beautiful books.
@margo33674 жыл бұрын
MK Moreland I think the first (Bring Up the Bodies), although it's been awhile since I read the first two. She took several years to come out with the third. Wolf Hall was great too, that's centered on Anne Boleyn. Did you see the series, "Wolf Hall"? It was fabulous. Great cast.
@margo33674 жыл бұрын
Eric Loscheider She takes a more sympathetic tone with Thomas Cromwell than I've seen done in the past. She humanizes rather than demonizes him. I agree. They are beautiful books. I was afraid she wouldn't complete the trilogy, but oh ye of little faith, she did and I'm delighted.
@teewithey58794 жыл бұрын
What happened to the person who jousted Henry and knocked him off?
@whiterabbit-wo7hw4 жыл бұрын
Nothing. It was the kings idea that he wanted to "show off" in front of everyone. He loved the attention.
@teewithey58794 жыл бұрын
white rabbit 1968 ah really? Given that a lot of people call him a tyrannical leader I would of been sure he would of had him killed, as a show of power & “thanks for embarrassing me” even though it was his own idea 😅
@jo-vf8jx4 жыл бұрын
Tee Withey He didn’t really become like that until after his accident.
@Concetta206 ай бұрын
I don’t think they’re excusing him, they’re just providing more clarity to the situation. Henry wasn’t acting alone.
@jenniferwasinski36752 жыл бұрын
Henry the 8th. A true story of spousal abuse in Tudor England. Each and every one of those women were abused horribly by that man
@RaceOplasmaz4 жыл бұрын
Leg looks like he got hit by birdshot.
@adrianmorris37723 жыл бұрын
Very interesting thanks for your video. Greetings from Adrian in Sheffield South Yorkshire England 😀😺
@Ad_Astra20233 жыл бұрын
After all that fuss over gaining a son, the irony is that Anne’s daughter Elizabeth ruled the country just fine in the end. Perhaps she didn’t marry on purpose in order to end her Tudor line against her crazy father’s wish.
@noabatmelech3 жыл бұрын
"It suited the king to belive them" so true!!! All he cared was his line of succession, nothing more
@megantaur36833 жыл бұрын
Queen Elizabeth is Anne’s greatest revenge.
@ripemm57374 жыл бұрын
Looks like a lot of people watched the tudors
@thereforeayam4 жыл бұрын
I like how the injury matches the red ivy on the castle--guy must've been 'built very well'.
@CptnJCFG4 жыл бұрын
True game of thrones level stuff here
@theoldar4 жыл бұрын
Real history is far more interesting than fiction!
@justfine86474 жыл бұрын
Game of Thrones is based on Henry the VIII's reign, actually. ;)
@justfine86474 жыл бұрын
@Ari Renzi-Surprenant you're right! everything about his life and family. It's not an exact copy, plus the dragons and zombies, but it is "inspired" by Henry and that period.
@anneneville62554 жыл бұрын
Just Fine denearys is based on Henry VII (his father)
@pennysunshine52612 жыл бұрын
They always say “how you get ‘‘em is how you lose ‘em”.
@juanitarichards10744 жыл бұрын
All royal courts everywhere were filled with division and intrigue, full of ambitious greedy courtiers trying to outdo the others. Nothing has changed with modern royalty, as we can see.
@moll50862 жыл бұрын
Yes still going on
@sayitlikeitis50263 жыл бұрын
Anyone know where I could watch this in full?
@dawnemile49744 жыл бұрын
Just demonstrates the wickedness of patriarchy.
@sawyerthestarling4 жыл бұрын
Seems fitting after what she did to conspire against Catherine of Aragon and her daughter Mary. She celebrated her death and was a horrible stepwitch so it seems she wasn't a sympathetic victim. Maybe it's what she had to do in a time like that but it obviously came with consequences.
@caitlinallen84004 жыл бұрын
I think that may be a bit harsh. I believe she made mistakes, but she wasn't evil. She was ambitious, and I think she truly believed that Henry's marriage to Katherine of Aragon was unlawful. Therefore, in her eyes, Henry was actually a single man whom she ambitiously set her sights on. But I think she truly loved him also.
@sawyerthestarling4 жыл бұрын
I think she was perfectly evil and never believed the marriage to be unlawful. She wanted what she wanted and took it with no regard for what she left in her wake. She was jealous and threw a party when the true and rightful queen died and that is one of several documented incidents I draw my opinion from.
@caitlinallen84004 жыл бұрын
Perhaps her motives were somewhere in the middle ground of what we each respectively think. Not evil, but not great. Just a thought. 🤷
@karenvalentine73204 жыл бұрын
Actually Anne made 2 pleasant overtures to Princess Mary, asking her to let go of the past & accept Anne's marriage to her father. Anne promised that if she would, she would intervene with Henry to bring her back to the court & would have her be treated well. Mary rebuffed her harshly both times. That's when Anne went off on her & threatened to bring her down from her high horse.
@sawyerthestarling4 жыл бұрын
That was a problem she caused in the beginning and I would've reacted the same way. It was her high horse to be on. She had every right as the daughter of a king and if not for Anne there wouldn't have been anything to forgive or move on from.
@nonononocatvstheworld8044 жыл бұрын
Wow, so people are getting to the point of doing victim blaming on someone who was murdered centuries ago? Yikes. Get a job.
@mermaidmersea71134 жыл бұрын
How can I watch the whole episode?
@annagarza23774 жыл бұрын
The presenter emotes more than Simon Schama.
@bubugullapalli1534 Жыл бұрын
Watch Tudors series. The way Anne, her brother and her father conducted themselves is just very greedy and selfish. They faced consequences of their evil intentions and actions. No one was pure except the first queen Catherine of arogan, she was the real queen who handled herself very gracefully.
@moll50862 жыл бұрын
When I visited the Tower of London the chapel there had a strange uneasy feeling like there were unhappy spirits Many years later I read that Jayne Seymour had been buried beneath the Chapel floor
@cijoyvar90293 жыл бұрын
Old testmanent actually States younger brother to marry widow of a older dead. So Why Henry's marriage to his brothers widow was considered sin? Can someone explain
@amandahealey22163 жыл бұрын
Because Henry VIII's understanding of the Bible wasn't as thorough as he would have liked it to be
@seanmcguire79744 жыл бұрын
Wheres the whole documentary?
@Brown20994 жыл бұрын
I love how everyone in the comments section are all historians now; historical debate has become personal opinion de facto to modern day standards in this comments section. Think a little before you start rambling about something your not completely informed on. Perhaps you’ve been taught aspects of the early Tudors in school, sixth form, collage, university and etc. With this in mind you can make an evidenced deduction, thats how historical interpretation works. Talking more colloquially and generally is fine, just be aware you aren’t speaking with a proposed imperial truth when you say things that have a general social consensus by modern standards or that we perceive in a specific way with limited evidence and sources.
@brianparent3 жыл бұрын
Wasn't George Boleyn, Anne's brother, also accused of committing adultery with Anne Boleyn? Some have said that Anne Boleyn was more Protestant than Martin Luther was who was the first to translate The New Testament into The English Language, but it was John Rogers that finished William Tyndale's work as well as publishing William's New Testament Bible.
@MemineAussi3 жыл бұрын
Cromwell confirmed to Chapuys that Henry ordered the whole charade.
@PrincessofErised4 жыл бұрын
I think he was unpopular for putting Catherine aside and breaking with Rome. Killing Anne, who did not produce a male heir, literally would be killing 2 birds with one sword. He would put the break squarely on her saying he had been bewitched and the lack of a son was proof. the people would never want to blame their king and took the easy scapegoat. Second, he would marry again and get the son he desired.
@naelair4 жыл бұрын
King Henry, the Great delivered us from the Roman church! We should all of us be willing to die, to give our lives for this deliverance. King Henry the eighth was England's greatest king.
@JanMike92 жыл бұрын
Anne educated him on the Reformers-he previously labelled them as blasphemers. All credit rightly to Anne Boleyn for the establishment of The Church of England.
@chickasawstarrmountain97473 жыл бұрын
I cant get over how cruel anne was to mary
@mirora22124 жыл бұрын
Henry could off also fabricated the ‘evidence’
@Pine_pawz13 күн бұрын
could HAVE
@llydrsn4 жыл бұрын
Wasn't it Cromwell also who was behind the beheading of St. Thomas More?
@nameslesss4 жыл бұрын
Was Thomas more the poet who was suspected to be Anne bolyn’s lover?
@nameslesss4 жыл бұрын
I think he was tortured into admitting Anne was in love with him..??
@karenvalentine73204 жыл бұрын
@@nameslesss No, that was Thomas Wyatt. He did love Anne & wrote several poems about her. But she only liked him as a friend. He was sent to the Tower by Cromwell, then let go. While in the Tower, Wyatt had a clear view of the executions & wrote a poignant poem about his experience. Here's some of it: "It is a great loss that you are dead and gone The time you had above your poor degree the fall whereof your friends may well bemoan A rotten twig upon so high a tree has slipped your hold and.. you are dead and gone. These bloody days have broken my heart. My lust, my youth did them depart, And blind desire of ambitious souls who hastes to climb seeks to revert and about the throne, the thunder rolls."
@annieoakley29254 жыл бұрын
@@nameslesss Thomas More was Henry's great friend, philosopher and writer and served in government posts. He refused to recognize Henry's right to divorce Anne and that sealed his fate.
@nameslesss4 жыл бұрын
Karen Valentine dang there are way too many thomases in the Tudor period
@samanthaanderson97434 жыл бұрын
Didn't Henry have his head injury in January 1536 ? And not the leg injury.
@rorygilmore24703 жыл бұрын
yeah.. he did
@shilohstore60864 жыл бұрын
Okay you can make fun of me all you want but it wasn't until now that I realized her name isn't Amber Lynn 😂
@Alex_Karas Жыл бұрын
Even today, Anne Boleyn is rarely portrayed in a positive light. And it is sad. She was extremely brave. It was a man's world after all. The real woman is buried underneath all the biased accounts and propaganda of the era. But we do perhaps get glimpses of the real Anne Boleyn in the final days of her life.
@aaronkaczmarek50324 жыл бұрын
She went after a married man pushed him to find a way to oust his wife to make room for her, ensured a whole countries religion was changed just so she could be queen, was horrible what happened to he but she could have caused the same thing to happen to Catherine by her actions to endure she wasn’t just a mistress, all for power
@si46323 жыл бұрын
Exactly 🤣👏
@aaronkaczmarek50322 жыл бұрын
@anonymous 112 she refused him unless he removed his wife and made her replacement? Lol she knew what she was doing 😂
@erikwilson76224 жыл бұрын
Reading about Henry prior to viewing this, I felt he was the Devil reborn, now convinced,,,,
@Marcus510904 жыл бұрын
Do we actually Know the medical condition that was stopping his leg healing ?
@amysteriouslady82574 жыл бұрын
I thought i red somewhere he suffered from diabetes and later in his life he contracted syphilis
@Marcus510904 жыл бұрын
Amysterious lady syphilis was a common ailment but it wouldn’t impede his regenerative functions
@mcaskey3584 жыл бұрын
I recall a Documentary with Lucy Worsley where they found he most likely had Type II Diabetes. Also I recall reading that even if he'd been alive today, the only option would have been amputation.
@kellydesilva67333 жыл бұрын
Diabetes, which he is thought to have had, can overtime reduce blood flow to the legs and feet. This can lead to ulcers which are notoriously difficult to heal even now. Then medicine could do nothing for it. His only option to be rid of it would have been amputation and given the lack of knowledge at the time would probably lead to sepsis and death.
@edwardpickett17604 жыл бұрын
What all comments haven't taken into consideration is it was always cut throat times throughout the world let alone in England in those times. A son and heir was of paramount importance in every nation that had a king.
@JanMike92 жыл бұрын
Which is just about the dumbest policy monarchies adhered to. England's greatest monarchs are its Queens.
@Miamcoline4 жыл бұрын
Jesus christ, I had no idea the story was that insidious.
@janehaylay11524 жыл бұрын
They stated many facts wrong(so much for doing proper research behind it...). Though I agree, at least Cromwell wanted Anne death.
@Algebrodadio4 жыл бұрын
Should watch "The Tudors" on Netflix. It may not be super historically accurate, but it's entertaining.
@Miamcoline4 жыл бұрын
@@Algebrodadio I will, thank you!
@gavinmillar8164 жыл бұрын
@@Miamcoline Watch Wolf Hall instead. Far more accurate. Better acting. Much better writting and directing. The Tudors is soapy nonsense
@Miamcoline4 жыл бұрын
@@gavinmillar816 I am liking that description. I appreciate those criteria. You sound like a kindred spirit!
@12from1214 жыл бұрын
This is a 21st century retelling of history. Anne was no sweet innocent she played a part in the deaths of Fisher, Moore and Wolsey. She knew the game, the rules and she played it. Stop trying to recast her as a feminist lamb being led to slaughter.
@sheilahunter88073 жыл бұрын
Hahaha!! Love it she even says “Tudor fake news” lol That’s right!
@tammyweaver4552 жыл бұрын
What happened to her Head.🤴 because I was watching documentary and they said 👸her head 💁wasn't buried with her body was she buried in❓❔ Westminster Abbey ✝️ 💂
@janehaylay11524 жыл бұрын
What they said about Henry's jousting incident is wrong. Henry VIII according to English sources fell but was unharmed(or at least not visibly harmed). Source from Rome state his fall was bad and that he was unconscious for 2 hours. His ulcer opened later on-old jousting injury from previous years. But there was a big change in Henry VIII's personality after this jousting incident-but it might have not had anything to do with his physical health but with his psychological health. Because Anne's miscarriage was just five days after he felt(possibly she was not told straight away he was fine), it could be this miscarriage what was the last trigger-of his mental breakdown. He was not acting exactly sane and reasonably since this point, was paranoid, easily manipulated etc. And I agree he was lead by people into believing Anne cheated upon him. (I am not ruling out the possibility of there being some injury from his jousting fall in 1536. But surely documentaries should stop spreading these misconceptions about his last jousting fall. Can't they do proper research behind it?!) ... Also what third miscarriage? We know of only two. Only two are confirmed! The rumoured third in 1535, proper historians rule out as prove of another pregnancy because it is undoubtedly addressed to a man who died in 1534! It was just previously wrongly dated and it was just confirming the pregnancy previous year. Once again can't they do proper research behind it?! ... Producers of this tv show might have access to some original documents, but they don't have basic facts right!!! Because of people like those, misconceptions and total untruths such as Katherine of Aragon fighting personally in Battle of Flodden Field are still spread widely in population.
@poochoes14 жыл бұрын
Did you see the special on the discovery channel? They recreated the jousting accident with a huge piece of beef with sensors. It showed from the force of the fall Henry would have had major brain injuries as well as internal injuries. Pretty gruesome stuff. As for Anne Bolyen, Henry had done some heinous things to break from Rome and force his being head of the church, with or without Cromwell, I think Henry would have had her executed. He did it all for her, she promised him a son, it was all her fault. Henry was seduced by a witch who even slept with her own brother. Poor Henry, was ever a man more poorly done by, blah, blah, blah. Never believed she did anything but failed to produce a son.
@justinlanghorne96114 жыл бұрын
Conspiracies are real. Question everything, especially from governments. When media and government scream conspiracy theorists, no doubt that it had validity.
@FortitudineVincimus4 жыл бұрын
But don't go blindly believing all conspiracies are true though. Just take a look at the garbage that Qanon posts.
@arikosubumo24024 жыл бұрын
House of Cards: Tudor Version
@amandarussell81854 жыл бұрын
hows that evidence of a conspiracy if he was told to do it?? You gave zero "evidence"
@whiterabbit-wo7hw4 жыл бұрын
Talk about politics.
@macintosh464 жыл бұрын
We should look at this through modern eyes!
@zb72934 жыл бұрын
I'm sorry, but what evidence is that we didn't know already, or that show things differently?
@carlv13794 жыл бұрын
Clickbait
@kriegerkaiser4 жыл бұрын
Didn’t we already know all this?
@bradydomann31023 жыл бұрын
I thought Cromwell (being a Reformer and Lutheran) saw Wolsey’s downfall as a good thing for England?
@starflower2583 Жыл бұрын
So fitting that the ivy on Hampton Court Palace looks like a big blood stain.
@shimanopetermann90684 жыл бұрын
Not sure wether this was Cromwell wanting revenge (after all Wolsey died a natural death). It was Cromwell securing the Kings favour by helping Henry VIII. getting what he wanted, which was ending his marriage with Anne. He couldn't have that marriage just annulled. There was no reason. Anne hadn't been married before and Elizabeth and her other pregnancies were prove that the marriage had been consumated. Divorcing Anne without any good reason would've made Henry the clown of Christianity because he went to such great lengths to be able to marry her in the first place. The only acceptable and plausible reason would've been Anne commiting adultery.
@neilbuckley16134 жыл бұрын
I think the idea of Cromwell wanting revenge has come out of the Wolf Hall book and TV series. A much more likely motive was self preservation, he and the Boleyns had fallen out over some issues and they would not have hesitated to destroy him.