Shooting expired Fujifilm Provia 100F - Pentax 67

[@rafaelfrontadogomez2745]

The first portrait of your friend is really food. I like it. Thanks for your video.

[@olivercurson]

Nice man, real nice. Can’t wait to see more! Love that shot of the purple flowers, and those sea blues! And nailing portraits as per.

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

thanks my dude, pushing hp5 (120) to iso 3200 in the next vid so stay tuned

[@ruffprophetproductions]

really beautiful portraits. and when you said the blues were intense i was like "yeah yeah slide film" but then my jaw dropped when i saw that photo at 3:13 lol

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

thanks man, and yeah hahaha

[@ramiromaya]

My God man, the quality in this photos. 2021 and stil hitting

[@stevenpam]

Encouraging! I have some Provia and Velvia that expires 2005 and 2003, respectively. Wasn't sure about it but I'll give it a go!

[@retter2critical]

Very impressive portraits.

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

Thank you! Cheers!

[@MJLyon100]

Love the vid man - and the portraits, that bookeh is so silky smooth Wowza.

[@goldenfilmsuk3286]

really loved this one

[@eyesonly4451]

Outside, on a bright day with lots of white, you can always spot meter the sky and add two stops to protect your highlights.

[@edwardstewart4430]

Great images, I think that is what shooting film is all about, the highs and lows. I found that I love slide film, because of the small margin of error, but when you get it right, negative film can't compare, and digital can't equal the satisfaction I'm sure the ones you weren't totally happy with made you think,, with digital, we just shoot 20 shots of the same composition, and let the camera think for us, why not, it cost you nothing. Film keeps you on your toes, with the fear you might be wasting money, where digital eliminates that fear, and will hardly improve our total skills for shooting. I'm going to subscribe so I can see your progress. Oh, just wondering what scanner are you using for your images?

[@N199UA]

Nice idea to shoot portraits in the grass.

[@splootan]

Great video 👍 quick question what scanner did you use? Thanks 🙏

[@arcp_]

dude, these shots are amazing

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

thankyou !

[@sleepless5555]

love ALL your videos. i'm subscribing your channel.. please keep up the good work👌🏼

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

thanks!

[@KeelinProductions]

these images are so so incredible :~0

[@camillemartin193]

Merci ! I really like your video. :-)

[@FloraGaohehe]

Can you try 90mm,then compare with 105mm？

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

will be making a video soon comparing the two I think !

[@FloraGaohehe]

Samson Arnett-Roughley Thanks so much,I recently want to sale my 90mm,I still don’t know whether I should do that.

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

@@FloraGaohehe wym ? ha

[@randallstewart175]

Unless you prefer the longer focal length of the 105mm, keep the 90mm. It is optically superior tot he 105mm, although if you scan and do modest digital prints or just view on a monitor, you would see no quality difference.That the beauty of 6x7cm format. The image is so large to begin with, lens quality tends to become a secondary consideration.

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

@@randallstewart175 Depends on which 90mm or 105 you have !

[@J0shuaHurd]

Awesome vid! Where do you get ur film developed?

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

Colour stream in brighton

[@randallstewart175]

Most of the non-portrait images appear to be significantly over-exposed. If you are metering with your TTL metering on this camera, you need to modify your metering procedure to account for the fact that the meter measures light levels equally across the full screen without "center weighting" like almost all other TTL cameras in the last 40 years. Also, with slide film, you reverse the metering process compared to negative film. Rather than metering the shadows and exposing to optimize those parts of the image, you have to meter the highlights, exposing to place them no more than 1 stop over-exposed, and let the shadows fall where they may.

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

Yeah, thankyou. I knew this before but I tried a different exposure for some shots just incase the film was very unreactive

[@me.my.son.and.i]

Extra sensory perception 🤘

[@edwardstewart4430]

scratch that, just saw your video on scanning.

[@jmguitarnavy]

If you want an extra 9 stops of dynamic range use cinestill's cs6 E6 kit with the D9 developer. Many people talk wonders about it.

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

ooo will give that a look. Thanks

[@gabsl6483]

which iso did you rate it at? i have 400f expired in 2003 and im in doubt

[@LaughingStock_]

Box-speed.

[@roiloubia4483]

Sorry, but I am a bit confused. In one hand you are saying you are shooting expired Provia 100, and you talked about Portra. Are these images shit with Provia 100 or with Portra? Have you shot them at box speed (ISO 100) or have you over-exposed. I have a lot of Velvia and Provia (120 format) 6 to 10 years expired, but kept in my freezer. I am trying to figure out how to shoot them. Said that, I thank you for sharing your experience.

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

Only shots shown in this video are shot with Provia 100F! Shot at just below box speed... turns out I didn't need to over expose them in the end (hence whites clipping).

[@roiloubia4483]

@@SamsonArnettRoughley Thank you Samson for your prompt reply. That's really helps me. Take care

[@zaleskikrzysztof]

Rule of thumb with slides is to underexpose - this way you secure bright part of image from clipping

[@davidellinsworth22]

I think the rule of thumb with slides is to expose as correctly as you possibly can, not underexpose

[@ReubenJBrown]

yo yo yo, very nice. love the portraits - be interesting to consider wardrobe in relation to natural lighting conditions with this film: thinking about what you can get out of the vibrancy, and trying to more closely match the reflectivity of the clothes to the average light intensity you’re shooting in (darker clothes at sunset, brighter at mid day) to avoid clipping.

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

very good point, and something I didn't think about. and thankyou matey

[@joehearsey4740]

nice oneeee

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

Joe Hearsey joeeyy

[@dabzvapelord]

clipping isn't always bad my guy. that full length photo looks fine and unless you're printing would not be able to see that loss of data.

[@AdamWilkoszarski]

I don't agree about Provia not beeing good for a harsh light pictures. Some of your exaples proofs my point. It's the best all around slide out there. Just need to put some work into metering. Some of your pictures came out really good!

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

and yes i'd have to agree with you there, Just meant it's risky due to the amount of care you have to take over metering vs portra for example where you can just meter for the shadows and everything will be fine. Thankyou ! I'm very happy with a few of them.

[@denniswilliams4789]

Too bad about the blown whites. Not uncommon to see a shooter meter off a part of the subject rather than the light itself. Once you make this adjustment to your methodology you will be able to nail film exposure frame after frame roll after roll and always be spot on regardless of what you are shooting.

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

Was very out of date when I shot the roll, I tried some shots +1 stop over and some +2 to see if the film had become less reactive because I had a box of the stuff. If the +1 shot came out perfect then it would have let me know what to shoot the other rolls at.

[@1911geek]

No you metered average had you metered center or stopped down -1/2 to 1 stop you it would have worked

[@abdelkadernazef6999]

The Title is Shooting expired Fujifilm Provia 100F - Pentax 67. You talked more about Portra than about expired Provia during this video. Next time stick on the subject. Very disappointing.. I hate putting negative comments, but Sorry that's the way it is.

[@SamsonArnettRoughley]

I am so sorry for disappointing you, I can refund you if you want? oh wait