Sigma 10-18mm F2.8 | The BEST Ultra Wide Angle Lens for Sony APS-C Cameras! SECRET FULL-FRAME LENS?

Sigma 10-18mm F2.8 | The BEST Ultra Wide Angle Lens for Sony APS-C Cameras! SECRET FULL-FRAME LENS?
📸 Lightroom Presets: www.curtispadley.com/store/p/...
- Sigma 10-18mm F2.8 - geni.us/HoMAPSg
- Sony A6700 Camera Only - geni.us/XxyZ7eT
- Sony A6700 W/16-50 Lens - geni.us/OmB0Sly
Follow & Get Involved
Instagram: / curtispadley
Use #curtispadley Your Work Could Be Featured on the Channel!
What's in my Camera Bag!?
My Camera Bag: geni.us/QhA9IM
Camera One (Video Beast): geni.us/1eeAT
Camera Two (Photo Beast): geni.us/0YNh
APS-C Beast (A6400): geni.us/9HZDjcJ
My Most Used Lens Currently: geni.us/UHnEFn
My Favouite Prime Lens, It's addicting: geni.us/E3TcJ00
The Most Versitle Zoom Lens: geni.us/38z4oe
Incredible portrait & detail (Cheaper alternative) lens: geni.us/ZT7t1S
A Classic Prime Lens, a beauty: geni.us/GDu05
My Wicked Zoom Zoom telephoto Lens: geni.us/tTlGyU
Flying Thing (legal everywhere): geni.us/iAIxS
SD Cards I am using: geni.us/j3L8eU
The Action Camera I use: geni.us/iAIxS
Chest Mount for POVs: geni.us/c4LK
Vlogging Tripod: geni.us/oc9fhWG
Sunglasses for Cameras: amzn.to/42wmr2U
Tripod - geni.us/nNBMg
Gimbal I use: amzn.to/45R0crB
** Please note, clicking any of these links above and buying from Amazon helps support my channel as I get a little commission from each order at no extra cost to you. Thank you for your support. **
Follow Me:
Instagram: / curtispadley
Website: www.curtispadley.com/
Twitter: / curtispadley
•••Music •••
Music - Epidemic Sound, COPYRIGHT FREE MUSIC FOR CREATORS!
Click Here for a 1 Month Free Trial - www.epidemicsound.com/campaig...

[@flossysmith7307]

Morning Curtis. Another indepth, informative and creative video. Your enthusiasm about your work is catching. Thank you Curtis for all your hard work in putting these videos together and MERRY CHRISTMAS to you and your family. All the best, Floss.

[@ikemadethis894]

Thank you for the review!!

[@motanveer]

your personality is awesome.

[@user-mx2qq5oy6f]

Yes! The holy trinity!! I thought the same when this lens came out with the idea hmmm is sigma silently doing something here? I absolutely love the 18-50 and have felt that any “trinity” for Sony APS-C is a Frankenstein mixture…which we make it work, but how killer would that be to get a 50-100+mm f/2.8 sigma lens made for Sony APS-C?!

[@thebirdman612]

Thank you for this review

[@paulm8157]

Quality post, Curtis. Cool train station - nobody else around, nice! Yes, a zoom at the tele end (say, 50 to 150 or 135) would be welcome. When the lens is attached to a full frame camera, what does the EXIF data report? Am thinking that at 10mm on lens divided by 1.5 crop factor the equivalent f/l would be 6.7mm, but the EXIF data might be 10mm. Correct? Cheers!

[@CurtisPadley]

Ayyy thanks Paul! 🤙 From what I know it just shows the focal length and all the other data. Shutterspeed, aperture etc even when on a Fullframe camera which is just awesome! It's slightly different you times the focal length by 1.5x not divide it. On a Fullframe camera it would be 10-18 and on APS-C it would be a 15-27mm. If my maths is correct. Hope that helps! Cheers mate 😁

[@showmoon]

Thank you for the reviıew. I love lens that has a character.

[@alanangelophoto]

Looking forward for your street photography session with this lens. Cheers mate 🍻

[@Natahsz]

for photography the stars? is good?

[@bondgabebond4907]

Now Sigma needs to give us a 50mm to whatever zoom to fill this gap. Their 18-50mm f2.8 is a wonder zoom. It makes photography fun. Looking forward to adding this super wide angle zoom to my collection.

[@alexeipg]

Do you prefer the ultrawide zoom to an f/1.4 wide prime (e.g., sony 15mm, sigma 16mm, viltrox 13mm)? Sigma 10-18 seems more versatile and it's nice and small, but I do like how much light the f/1.4 lets in for night and astro, and how you can get some subject separation with the primes for wide-angle portraiture. Been struggling to decide whether to stick with my prime (sony 15mm) or jump over to the sigma zoom.

[@gamadrid]

I'm on the same question. If I should continue with my sony 11m or change it to the sigma 10-18

[@WillKoz]

What did you end up doing

[@alexeipg]

@@WillKozI’ve stayed with the 15mm. It is just such a nice lens that works so well with the a6700 size- and performance-wise that I can’t give it up.

[@JeffCorcelius]

Had the viltrox 23mm, those older viltrox design lenses aren't that great. Mine broke after warranty with no way to repair. The newer pro versions have a better build quality.

[@Sebartus]

Any information when we see Viltrox 75mm f1.2 vs Sigma 56mm f1.4 in studio and outside as we know that you have both of this lenses ?

[@jorgeherrera8383]

got the viltrox and it’s 🔥

[@CurtisPadley]

It will be out when it's ready 👍

[@thomart-studios]

No problem with Sony A7S3 FULL FRAME?

[@AnthonnyTag]

Amazing video, but one nitpick: shot at 8:20, you're talking about how compact the setup is but then this insane lens flair makes it impossible to see well throughout almost the entire duration of the clip, I get it flairs are cool, but I wanna see what you're saying

[@fishyvlogs290]

I want two lenses for my sony a6700 to shoot event and fashion and also some wide angle underwater and wildlife photography

[@PaulFeinberg]

@kylewattstv was the first person to do that video! Even before Matti! It is a good trick though. Hyper stabilization take most of the vignette away on ZV-E1….good stuff as always!

[@CurtisPadley]

It's a fantastic trick ain't it! This and the ZV-E1 would be an incredible combo! 🤙

[@PaulFeinberg]

@@CurtisPadley your awesome mate!!! #loveyourcreators

[@williamperez8170]

I picked one up the moment it came into my local store. Hoping for a compact telezoom from sigma next, maybe 50-210mm We need a Sigma Zoom Trio

[@davidconti_travels]

A sigma telephoto to finish the trip would be awesome. I would be ok with a 50-150 as long as it keeps the compact form factor.

[@CurtisPadley]

Ayyy that's awesome! Yess that compact zoom lens is definitely needed! What a trio that would be 🤙

[@frankfeng2701]

7:35 Laowa just released a full-frame AF 10mm f/2.8 that takes 77mm filter.

[@AJCoReTV]

Got a link?

[@mussmadeit]

Can't choose between the Sigma 10-18mm f/2.8 or Sony 10-18mm F4 OSS Lens. The Sigma has lower aperture which is cool but what about the OSS of the Sony lens? Going for the Sigma probably

[@juniask]

Go for the sigma !

[@F.elip3]

Does this lens have AF? like if I want to use it to record video?

[@sorokawww]

Of course

[@F.elip3]

@@sorokawww have you tried the tamron 11-20mm?

[@sorokawww]

@@F.elip3 sorry, but not

[@shymlive_studio]

Plece preset yes

[@Eikenhorst]

7:35 this is not entirely true. The 10-18mm on Full Frame has an equivalent field of view of 15-27mm. It is true that on Sony E-mount you can't get a FF lens less than 16mm that accepts filters. On Nikon and Canon you have the 14-30 and 14-35mm respectively, that go even wider and also accept filters.

[@rojoph5297]

What's causing the vlog test to be so shaky?

[@cesarpedraza_cl]

I think because he wanted to show the full wide angle posible, without the active stabilization crop.

[@giovannigio6217]

I read the tamron 11-20mm f/2.8 is slightly better, the sigma is not very sharp. In general I am a big fan of most APS-C Sigma lenses so I understand the hype, this lens is still quite good afterall.

[@alexeipg]

lots of reviews saying tamron slightly sharper in center and sigma sharper in corners. for an ultrawide zoom that will likely be used a fair amount for landscapes, I'd prioritize edge-to-edge sharpness over center sharpness. I believe the Tamron has more robust weather-sealing, though, so that's one point in its favor.

[@Joh146]

The Sigma ist not very sharp? That is nonsens, especially on Sony. That show different reviews. And you can see reviews whiich see the Sigma in front of the Tamron, too.

[@CurtisPadley]

That's Intresting, from my testing I have no complaints about the sharpness from the Sigma. I haven't personally tested the Tamron so maybe a comparison is needed to see the differences. 😁✌️

[@Cthames123]

Isn’t the Tamron longer, heavier, and $100 more expensive?

[@lb_projekt]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jqWscquOn8-FmLcsi=LUvASHi95H1XI32g

[@ChillStudyDate]

Th problem this I that th f2.8 is equal to a 4.2 aperture you don’t get that creamy bokeh. If they made it with a 1.4-1.8 would be a instant buy

[@CurtisPadley]

This is very true, however you need to take into consideration its an ultra wide lens. So it's ideal for landscape, cityscapes, architectural and real estate photography/videography. So within that we may not really notice depth of field cause of the nature the lenses 10-18 focal length. In terms of Aperture for zoom lenses by default are normally either F2.8 or F4. I ain't much of designer but what I understand it's very difficult to make a zoom lens with a shallower Aperture such as F1.4 or F1.8 without making it much bigger, heavier and more expensive. To help you out, what I'd recommend is looking at ultra wide prime lenses. This way you can get those F1.4 or F1.8 apertures. Hope that helps ✌️

[@max-olson]

A 1.4 ultrawide zoom would be enormous.

[@editor4958]

Not sure about that. Mount the lens and put it at say 18mm at a 2.8. Switch from apsc to FF. The field of view changes, not the bokeh right. 2.8 is 2.8. The equivalency conversion is meant to address both FOV and aperture for achieving similar effect. That 18mm 2.8 set in apsc would require a 27mm at f4.5 on a full frame for same field of view/bokeh. 10mm f2.8 apsc would require 15mm f4.5 on a FF lens dig? 2.8=2.8.

[@editor4958]

@@CurtisPadley You: "This is very true," respectfully, it is not. Please see my response to chillstudydate.

[@MBoss-ro6qd]

It would be twice the price at least at that point