Sigma 16mm 30mm 56mm F1.4 | WHAT ONE SHOULD YOU BUY?

  Рет қаралды 28,001

TCM Reviews

TCM Reviews

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 28
@666tonsofsquirrels
@666tonsofsquirrels Жыл бұрын
4:57 FINALLY a video where I'm shown the distance to camera. THANK YOU my friend 💪
@crowking76
@crowking76 2 жыл бұрын
I also have all three lenses. I could stay with only 30mm which is most versalite and beautifuly neutral. I am a bit disappointed with 16mm, it's to wide for me also introduces too much distortion, so I do not use it very often. I would love 24mm instead (~35mm FF equivalent). Personally for portraits I prefer 30mm instead 56mm but I love using this short Tele occasionally to catch special perspective in landscape photography but finally I also use it less than expected.
@TheCameraManReviews
@TheCameraManReviews 2 жыл бұрын
I think you summed it up perfectly^
@BOGZTER9Artist
@BOGZTER9Artist 2 жыл бұрын
I have the 16mm and 56mm .16 awesome for wideshot like Labdscape and Architectures ,56mm is Brilliant for Portrait shots.
@Rental-
@Rental- Жыл бұрын
I recently bought the 16mm and I am pretty satisfied with it and Im searching for 30 and 56 for resales. Anyways, I appreciated your video with these comparisons which I used for research and made decisions :)
@imanagementbrazil4845
@imanagementbrazil4845 2 жыл бұрын
I have the entire trio since two years now. The quality of images taken is very superb compared to other lenses. During the past 6 months several times I thought about a change to an equivalent zoom lens, e.x. the new Sigma 18-50mm or the Sony 16-55mm. The Sony offers the better image quality, but the f2.8 is a certain disadvantage compared to the f1.8 of the trio. As I’m using the lenses for night/street photography, the trio offers better quality. If I compare the Sigma trio with the new Sigma zoom 18-50, without any doubt, I stay with the trio. Overall, the trio comes with the best image quality.
@justdiyit9683
@justdiyit9683 2 жыл бұрын
You mean f1.4 of the trio not 1.8
@saifaldin_
@saifaldin_ Жыл бұрын
30mm: weakest in terms of performance, but most versatile. Easiest to compose with too. 16mm: mid level in terms of performance, but very niche in usage. Largest and heaviest of the three. 56mm: best in terms of performance, but also more specific use. Smallest and lightest of the three. In summary: (for me personally) choose based on the angle of view needed first; then consider either quality/ size & weight.
@domesdayfilms3165
@domesdayfilms3165 3 ай бұрын
Great content. How would you say the auto focus is? Would you recommend the 30mm and 56mm for shooting a two camera interview? (on say an fx30)
@TheCameraManReviews
@TheCameraManReviews 3 ай бұрын
That is an interesting question with so many variables, I personally would go for the 18-50 sigma f2.8 and then 1 prime, prob 56mm then you are covered with all options.
@daoui19
@daoui19 2 жыл бұрын
The best video for Sigma 1.4 comparaison. Thnx a lot.
@TheCameraManReviews
@TheCameraManReviews 2 жыл бұрын
My pleasure!
@JustinBee369
@JustinBee369 2 жыл бұрын
By far best review on the three lense- very concise. Thanks 👍
@adamsjohnathan57
@adamsjohnathan57 Жыл бұрын
If you were making a movie and forced to use the m50, which lense would you get first? I'm torn between the 30mm for intimate scenes and detail and the 16mm any guidance would be appreciated! God bless
@babyboy1971
@babyboy1971 29 күн бұрын
About to hop into Sony, can’t decide if my Sigma “trilogy” will be the 23, 30 and 56 or the 16, 23 and 56. Or…the 18-50, 23 and 56!!!
@sunwalker4017
@sunwalker4017 2 жыл бұрын
i have the 16mm, great for landscape
@shirakawanaoya
@shirakawanaoya 6 ай бұрын
Buy all of them. They are worth it.
@ethanadams9135
@ethanadams9135 2 ай бұрын
How would you compare the Viltrox 13, 27, and 75 to the Sigma trio?
@TheCameraManReviews
@TheCameraManReviews 2 ай бұрын
Yeah Viltrox are producing some stunning lenses at the moment, defienletey worth considering.
@iamwanderingby
@iamwanderingby 2 жыл бұрын
Hi. Have 30 mm on my A6600 for videos - nice sharp image, but better use with manual focus, especially in low light conditions.
@grainfrizz
@grainfrizz 11 ай бұрын
the 23mm + 56mm are the ones that you should buy
@GregBrecker
@GregBrecker 2 жыл бұрын
I have the 16mm, don’t know if I’ll go 30 & 56 or get the 18-50 f2.8.
@angelofaria6339
@angelofaria6339 Жыл бұрын
Agree
@viratsinha23
@viratsinha23 3 ай бұрын
i own 56mm and its the best
@iloveyouQuran
@iloveyouQuran Жыл бұрын
I HAD 16MM BUT NOW I WANT TO SELL IT AND BUY 30 MM
@igoryudnikov6198
@igoryudnikov6198 2 жыл бұрын
The best one is 56, 30mm loses contrast in counter light, 16 was not very useful, sold all of them
@sbsid1994
@sbsid1994 2 жыл бұрын
You still on apsc or upgraded to full frame?
@thedarknightgamer9930
@thedarknightgamer9930 2 жыл бұрын
Brother please tell me 30 mm is better than Sigma zoom 1850 reply soon please
Sigma 16, 30 & 56mm 1.4. My Advice.
13:14
Stuart Rodwell
Рет қаралды 154 М.
Quilt Challenge, No Skills, Just Luck#Funnyfamily #Partygames #Funny
00:32
Family Games Media
Рет қаралды 55 МЛН
How to treat Acne💉
00:31
ISSEI / いっせい
Рет қаралды 42 МЛН
人是不能做到吗?#火影忍者 #家人  #佐助
00:20
火影忍者一家
Рет қаралды 15 МЛН
Sigma Lenses RESCUED CANON | 16mm, 30mm, 56mm f/1.4 Review
23:05
Tech Gear Talk
Рет қаралды 256 М.
Sigma Trio & ZV-E10 Comparison | Sharpest APS-C lenses?
11:30
The Film Alliance
Рет қаралды 73 М.
Sigma 56mm F1.4 Lens Review: It's Perfect.
10:21
Arthur R
Рет қаралды 305 М.
BEST Sigma Lenses for Video (Compare 16mm, 30mm, 56mm)
6:36
Live Streaming Pros
Рет қаралды 24 М.
Sigma 18-50mm 2.8 vs The Sigma Primes (16, 30 & 56mm 1.4)
5:33
Stuart Rodwell
Рет қаралды 187 М.
Sigma 56mm F1.4 vs Sony 50mm F1.8 OSS | Which One?
13:37
that1cameraguy
Рет қаралды 49 М.
Sigma, Viltrox, TTArtisan: The Ultimate Budget 56mm Lens Test
21:13
Sigma 16mm vs 30mm - What's my Favorite Lens for Sony E-Mount?
7:31
Adrian Salisbury Training
Рет қаралды 23 М.