Sigma 60-600mm vs 150-600mm: Which is Worth It? | Wildlife Photography

[@Inuhater]

I’ve been eyeing both of these lenses specifically for wildlife and nature photography and am now definitely sold on the 150-600. Over the years I’ve acquired a fleet of vintage telephoto lenses so the 150-600 will be my first telephoto with autofocus. Very excited to get my paws on that lens 🎉

[@JosephValenti]

You won’t regret it! It’s a beauty.

[@ActionXander]

I've rented both lenses and I'm still trying to decide which one to buy for my S5II. This was a helpful video!

[@JosephValenti]

Do you think you have a leaning yet?

[@ActionXander]

@@JosephValenti I actually pulled the trigger on the 150-600mm sports lens. I have the 70-300mm macro Lumix so I didn't want the extra weight of the 60-600mm. Price and weight were definitely factors. Both lenses are extremely capable.

[@JosephValenti]

@@ActionXander that’s how I went!

[@pablosirreno]

@@ActionXander Thanks for the update and rationale.

[@alikamuneli]

I got the 60-600mm for my S5iix. They work together perfectly fine. The image quality is fine. Not the sharpest lens on the market but certainly sharp enough for a 10x lens. Best for sports (outdoor), wildlife, events (wedding, etc), and portraits. Night performance is okay, the dual native iso from the S5iix is really a major factor when it comes to low light shooting with the lens. Autofocus at night can be hunting at times so I prefer shooting manually at night most of the times. Overall, you can’t go wrong with this lens. It is very versatile and functions like two telephoto lenses in one. That alone I think speaks for itself.

[@AranzamendiPodcast]

I grabbed a 150-600mm F/5-6.3 DG Contemporary, new in the box, for $500. A friend received it as a gift but did not plan to use it, so he sold it to me! I took a few photos at night, and I was pleased. I will test it during the next few days on my R6 during daylight to see what I come up with. Thank you for the video!

[@JosephValenti]

Sounds like you got a great deal!

[@mauriciolee7349]

Thank Joseph for pointing out the Sigma 60-600mm is for someone who needs to shoot sports & wildlife. That's exactly what I need. I wish you tested it in low light condition too. I know it is not good as a f2.8 lens but I need to see its sample to make an informed decision before buying it.

[@JosephValenti]

Hey glad it helped, question - how much low light we talkin here ;p

[@mauriciolee7349]

@@JosephValenti Thanks for your quick response. When I say low light, I mean for example shooting sports event in an indoor stadium like a basket ball match, or hockey match.

[@JosephValenti]

@@mauriciolee7349 with Sony I can speak that you will have a decent time. ISO bumping isn’t that bad these days and those events should be lit well enough that you should be good

[@mauriciolee7349]

@@JosephValenti Excellent. That's exactly what I need to know before buying this lens. Thanks again.

[@JosephValenti]

@@mauriciolee7349 you’re welcome !

[@ChuckJ7777]

I am debating between the two myself. This information is helping.

[@D.D.M.SPORTS]

I just picked up the 60-600 this Tuesday and so far so good! I've really been enjoying it, however it is not light so if you go that way be ready lol

[@JosephValenti]

its sooooo heavy lol

[@alantessier1577]

I use a Monopod with my 60-600.

[@JosephValenti]

I like that. I love my mono pod I’ve never really used it for photo work tho. I might try this.

[@hititoffroad4545]

Nicely done, great honest review

[@JosephValenti]

Thank you I am glad you liked it!!

[@personallycatholic]

So helpful. Thank you.

[@JosephValenti]

I’m glad it helped out! Let me know if you have any questions

[@DocAlexB]

After two months of consuming endless KZbin videos on this debate, it's this video that has me convinced. 150-600 it is!!!

[@JosephValenti]

@@DocAlexB oof that’s actually a big compliment , thanks !!!!!!

[@DocAlexB]

@JosephValenti you're welcome. And thank goodness I made a decision. Mine was the last unit for the l mount on eBay that was under $1,000.