Top 5 world fastest commercial planes

[@stephenberry8658]

I flew Concorde once at age 26 in July 1979. Mach 2.02 London to New York in 3 hrs 23 min at 58,000 feet. On the ground I drove a 1978 Citroen 2CV6. Max speed 115 kph and a credit for all the up hills I could not reach the speed limit. On down hills I broke the ear drum sound barrier at 130 hph... Here in Australia.

[@patriciabarkley735]

I lived near Dulles Airport most of my adult life. I always loved watching the jets. The Concorde was my favorite. You could hear it crossing over the house, but you could never see it. It would be gone! Thank you for this. I loved it!! ❤️🌹❤️

[@Somerandomgodzillafan]

2:53 incredible work by the pilot in such a powerful crosswind. you can see the plane literally landing diagonally and the flaps moving like crazy from how strong the crosswind was. Crazy how durable the a380 is in these winds. truly a state of the art in aircraft design.

[@airspeed_alive]

Sadly not, they was both dismissed, he over corrected on the rudder

[@snn7609]

But we could not make a reverse engine, and therefore the Tu-144 had a braking landing parachute in case of wet weather. In addition, the experimental modification of the Tu-144LL with engines from the Tu-160 bomber, accelerated to 2600 km per hour, as a result of which he lost some of the paint and some aluminum wing parts ... but it's cool.

[@isras3780]

And I bet you home boy was texting with the other hand.He can fucken fly,no bull shit.Love those 380's.

[@baomantim953]

I love the Concorde I hope in the future it will come back

[@ridesharephil4240]

The Convair 990A is still the fastest non-supersonic commercial transport to have ever been produced. During May 1961, one of the pre-production 990 prototype aircraft set a record of .97 Mach in level flight at an altitude of 22,500 ft. (6.9 km), equivalent to a true airspeed of 675 mph (1 086 km/h). Wikipedia

[@bruce2357]

Perhaps you should take a reading comprehension course. It dove from a higher altitude and it reached .97 during that dive when it reached 22,000 ft., it's in plain English there is no ambiguity and the source is a magazine article which I looked at and it states the same thing, it was during a dive, not in level flight. During May 1961, one of the pre-production 990 prototype aircraft, while demonstrating the margin between its operating speed and its capability during a dive at .97 Mach from 32,000 ft to 22,500 ft, reached 675 miles per hour (1,086 km/h) at an altitude of 22,000 feet (6.7 km)

[@everettrailfan]

I've seen that first A380 landing before. The crosswind is crazy. I don't blame the pilot for putting her down too hard. I imagine he was fighting a lot of lift under the wings. Also, when he's taxiing down the runway, you can really see the horizontal stabilizers twitching in the wind.

[@rivolibioscoop]

Whish we kept the good things. Nice to go on holliday twice as fast as today.

[@NBMedia8928]

That was some skillful landing by the A380 pilot, I'd never have thought Concorde would be second

[@bucktoothbill5334]

Spoilers

[@sukeshshetty4418]

7

[@leonpona]

And Russian Tupolev 144 was build earlier than Concord....

[@TheRip72]

@@leonpona It was rushed. The result was an aircraft less stable & with less range than Concorde, quickly removed from the duties it was designed for.

[@edwardashton7502]

@@TheRip72 all seem to be forgetting that is crashed at the Paris Airshow and was never certified for use outside Russia.

[@kisubinoah7380]

Its a Wonderful job

[@RKAleemam]

wow Nice Video

[@alfincassimiro4878]

Beautiful ! Wonderful !

[@abitofeverything7892]

I still love the Concord. I wish it could be brought back to use.

[@kennethwood88]

I've heard that they will soon. They fly from NY to LA in 45 minutes.

[@touraneindanke]

Yes but the cost to refurbish them are to big so 💔💔💔

[@touraneindanke]

Darryl daniel george Bish ,There is no ,,old,, Concorde ! omg just to say old and Concorde in one sentence. She is the only type of Concorde there is ❤️ 50 jears on now. A ,,new,, one is never gonna look and feel so special. Visit one at a moment that your the only one present and enjoy. 👍

[@pizzabagerenmujaffa8123]

it only got grounded becouse it was rich folks flying that plane..good luck in the upgrded 737 max9

[@touraneindanke]

Anders Ottosen ,not realy true!

[@armenio1947]

Excellent video, great work. Thank you for sharing.

[@leojennings2438]

Sorry, I know that this is an old video, but it bugs me so much: THE A380 CRUISES AT 576 MPH NOT 676!! DURING SPEED TESTING IN A DIVE IT REACHED ABOUT THIS SPEED!!! IN A DIVE!! >:(

[@NDVC.]

*Thanks for sharing! Great footage! Best regards from Vietnam*

[@pilisuniula6406]

Samoa song

[@ericchen6096]

Speed of sound varies. What this video listed are speeds based on speed of sound at sea level. The speed of sound reduces as altitude increases. For most jet airplanes, mach 1 is at about 660-670 mph. The citation and A380 are not able to fly 700 mph.

[@Zipp0nIc]

It should be always calculated with LSS (local speed of sound), on cruising FL... Are u sure for MSL speed of sound?

[@dorotheaisserstedt9238]

Warum eigentlich wurde die Concorde ausser Dienst gestellt u d nicht weiter entwickelt ?Das Design dieses Flugzeugs war doch Top! Hat mir sehr gut gefallen,weil es an einen Vogel erinnert.

[@A_Man_In_His_Van]

That A380 landing looks like to know drift. Holy crap, I have never seen hundreds of tons just slid around like that. I'll bet that captain had to check his jockey shorts after that.

[@albertchuma4313]

The pilot was struggling with the crosswind, it need brain he's a legend

[@njrailfanner45]

And where is the Convair 990???

[@vieuxbal1253]

I was about to ask the very same question.

[@coronavirus4452]

wow me tooo!!

[@matthiashornbostel8240]

Not only the coronado. The Gulfstream G650 is faster than the Dassault Falcon900.

[@BALLALDEV]

What a great man made technology that heavy of weight Fly in Air in fastest Speed 👍

[@qualityinnsuites6585]

The British Vickers VC-10 still holds the trans-Atlantic speed record for a subsonic aircraft. This was also one of the most beautiful planes ever produced, sadly they have all now been taken out of service

[@VCYT]

coz theyre 60+ yrs old.

[@cashlets1629]

I LOVED NUMBER 1..AMAZING AND UNBELIEVABLE SPEED

[@sekarsanhye3641]

11.

[@jacktherimmer]

Concorde was a good collaboration. Britain did the engineering and France done the in flight catering.

[@julienr8114]

Amazing airplane but a very bad collaboration. That was a nightmare

[@gutorolim7554]

Convair Coronado 990 made 1220km/h cruise speed. VARIG Brasil had two on the Brazil-Europe lines on the early 60's.

[@iandocwra1169]

Absolutely untrue - 1220 km/h is 762.5mph, which at cruising altitude is well over Mach 1. The 990 was fast but it was not supersonic!

[@b-fabbrothersracing6617]

the a380 landing was VERY hard!

[@captainomala5451]

A380 never disappoints, daamn❤️

[@GiorgiosP13]

Really? Maybe you fly these things Captain Omala4727, but there's a reason the're going out of production. Just a big double decker bus, with people squashed in like sardines!

[@captainomala5451]

@@GiorgiosP13 it's killing me they are going out of production, they are my best favourite machines,have you tried business class or first class.? They have one of the world's best.

[@GiorgiosP13]

@@captainomala5451 I understand your point but the A380 never sold very well, plus the fact that many airports were reluctant to spend the money to be able to accept the plane into the terminal. I have only flown first class once when the plane was full and the only available seats were in first class, the airline gave me a first class seat for the price of a regular seat! Melbourne to Hong Kong, magnificent...!

[@captainomala5451]

@@GiorgiosP13 apparently being not small doesn't come cheap, more fuel, more parking, longer runaways, so it might have been like concorde air France which was way ahead of its time. The first class experience, well, that was wonderful from the airliner 💪🏾

[@GiorgiosP13]

@@captainomala5451 One other thing I remember from back in the day. When Boeing first built the 747, they designed the hump at the front to be like a lounge area for first class passengers. As soon as the airlines started buying them they just filled that area with seats!

[@GustavoMartinez-rv5xk]

R.i.p to that Emirates landing it more looked like a Ryanair landing

[@albertchuma4313]

The pilot was struggling with the crosswind, it need brain he's a legend

[@thomashaase8746]

Yeaa Yeaa supersonic bang. everyday the airforces around the wold do it and all is in love with this???????. bur Concorde is not American sooooooooooo

[@isras3780]

Now thats what I call a real pilot landind that A380 with the crosswinds

[@stellarch4986]

Actually, no. That pilot made a serious mistake by trying to catch back the runway centerline at all costs. He created a PIO ( Pilot Induced Oscillation ) which could have had tragic consequences. Every pilot who saw that video said that immediately : PIO ! PIO ! Thanks God, the A-380 is super sturdy and stable so it did not result in an accident or I should better say : a deadly catastrophe. Conclusion : A bad pilot who got reprimanded and had to undergo extra training.

[@maxsjoberg788]

@@stellarch4986 Everyone is an expert pilot when they're on the ground.

[@stellarch4986]

@@maxsjoberg788 I'm sure you're one of those... LoL

[@rafaelbailkebinow4099]

I love Concorde.

[@realLuisGiordano]

The Tu-144 was faster than the Concorde in both speed... And fuel consumption, as it had to fly on full afterburner to keep up it's supersonic cruise speed, greatly reducing it's operational range to just 3400 NM (400 NM shorter than Concorde's)

[@mentalistabohemio9202]

On Top of that they only show an Animated Video, Not an actual and real video. It did not even fly for 27 years like the Concorde.

[@river_salmon]

@@mentalistabohemio9202 "even"? Dude, as for me 27 years of operation is impressive for every aircraft. Anyway, the Concordski flew for 23 years, its final flight was on MAKS aviation...I guess, festival in 1999. I love it, by the way

[@kostaeliseev6292]

@@river_salmon о, величия привалило

[@river_salmon]

@@kostaeliseev6292 ?¿

[@thenitgroupoff]

Thanks for the this video, it is amazing. Just a quick one the music on the background is good also do you mind sharing the link or artist name?

[@luisurbina8424]

Y TC

[@themotownboy1]

The Convair 880 & 990 were the fastest jet airliners before the Concorde and Tu-144.

[@richardmorris7063]

I flew the 880 Convair,Chicago to Tampa ,1220 miles in 1 HR 52 min. In 1968.

[@everestmichael3822]

I will never rest in peace if Concord is not brought back and I use it at least once. My question, does the speed of a plane determined by a pilot as is with cars and drivers or it's automatic it has to reach it's limit no matter which pilot is in control? Help me plz.

[@ryanmailander4970]

You actually have no idea what you’re taking about so you lmao

[@scottlee719]

The tupolev never made it to commercial use 😂😂

[@_b_x_b_1063]

Flying passenger in the USSR

[@scottlee719]

@@_b_x_b_1063 i stand corrected it was cancelled and used for cargo after 55 flights i never knew that bit i do apologise

[@paulm2467]

The reason it was taken out of service is that it failed to complete its flight 80% of the time , not a success, more of a propaganda exercise than an aeroplane.

[@yves3560]

@@scottlee719 NASA used a Tu144 too, check it out. After it was retired. theaviationgeekclub.com/quick-look-nasa-tupolev-tu-144ll-research-program/

[@leonpona]

TU-144 is still flying and is faster (TU-160 ) Concordski was copy of Tupolev 144 , ya , ha ? Van Romondt

[@parinda1001]

Last one Tupolev is animated not the real one.

[@mileshigh1321]

Wow! Really?? LMAO

[@bucktoothbill5334]

Probably cause its dead

[@stoiandaniel0]

The real is here kzbin.info/www/bejne/jXa8lpWMi7Wcd7s

[@michellebrankovic6958]

Cz nobody wanted to film such an ugly plane when they could be filming the concord 🤣

[@sherwinsalvatori6997]

Do you by chance know what a commercial aircraft is .the tri jet falcon is a private jet , not a commercial

[@kennethcampbell7263]

Wonders how business aircrafts, mainly privately owned are called commercial aircraft

[@StallionFX1]

Ummmm The Dassault Falcon, Gulfstream 650, And Cessana Citation are not "commercial". Just FYI...

[@mariegraceroldan8590]

StallionFX1 true

[@matthiashornbostel8240]

I know what you mean, but it is not quite right. Many private airlines using these jets for commercial flights. Expensive, but absolute normal for rich or business people.

[@wms1650]

@@matthiashornbostel8240 I think the business Jets operate under aircraft regs 135. Airliners with scheduled flights operate under 135. I don't know of any scheduled business jets operating under 121. Some may, I just don't know of any.

[@wms1650]

@@matthiashornbostel8240 I should have stated airliners operate under 121.

[@salmanfarooqui9166]

Concorde is as Legend

[@albee8259]

If they just repaired whats wrong with concorde then imagine what kind of planes we have right now

[@dcartellone2659]

@@albee8259 they did, they retired it because it wasn't making enough money for British airways or air French. To bad they didn't keep one air worthy for special occasions. Was and still is the most beautiful plane made. R.i.p. concorde. Sadly missed.

[@menditman2004]

I read a while back there is a fund to put a Concorde back in the air, tbh now I can’t see it happening but I read the pot of money was quite large. Also in the same article they wanted to buy and and put it near the London eye and you could go on it and have a Concorde meal, that was the idea I read.

[@chamikarubasingha5343]

@@albee8259 ll

[@kenvc1016]

Don't forget the BAC VC10 subsonic record holder for the fastest trans Atlantic crossings from London to New York. Don't forget also the Convair C990 Coronado.

[@donaldthomson7682]

Why no Mention of the Engines on the No 1 Russian (Concord )

[@stoiandaniel0]

It 4 X kusnetov NK321 turbofun engine .

[@pb6198]

@@stoiandaniel0 they tried many configurations lol

[@andys3532]

What happened to the VC10? I believe it still holds the record for a transatlantic subsonic flight!

[@AlphaGametauri]

Nice list, but two planes are not commercial planes. They're private

[@fredotlogetswe3047]

The world was not worthy of a concorde. That thing was mighty

[@isras3780]

Homeboy rattles the baby.Id would love to fly that little monster.The A380.

[@isras3780]

Dont understand why they had to retire the concord.Put to proteccions under the wings on top of the wheels in case of any strikes.They should've thought of it from the beginning.

[@fredgrove4220]

They retired Concorde because it was not a feasable plane, it could only maintain supersonic over the ocean. Had to be sub sonic over land, because of the sonic boom. If you are going to go sub sonic, there are a LOT cheaper ways of doing it.

[@quazar912]

isra - competition my friend...rotten masonary capitalist competition...

[@isras3780]

I just love those plane that move. I just see that plane up in flames because it was built wrong.They got most of it right but forget of one of the most important things.Getting airborne. How could they do that.I'll never understand.Or landing.The most important.

[@Hattonbank]

@@isras3780 It was not built wrong. at take off speed it;s main wheels hit a metal part that fell off a preceding MD-11, and propelled it at high velocity and pierced a fuel tank that caused the fire. That badly maintained US airliner wa responsible for the chain of events and the loss of life but they tried to dodge any blame.

[@450sl79]

Just to add, the A380 can fly way past the 12 hours stated on this vídeo.

[@dionlindsay2]

I wondered, because the figures of range 16000 and 12 hours would come out at just over 1300 km per hour, or 800 miles per hour. Sounds improbably quick. If its cruising speed was even 600 mph the range in hours would be approx 16.

[@Cpr1234]

the longest route it flies today is 14 hours from Dubai to Auckland which Emirates does. Interestingly, Emirates also fly the shortest A380 route, a 40 minute shuttle between Dubai and Muscat

[@pooletrainboy]

@@Cpr1234 Interesting I wonder how that is profitable for them?

[@Micija]

14 hours is max

[@philippeciechanski8233]

Concorde is a legend and make many aircraft more sure.

[@ashar1380]

I saw the inaugural take off at Heathrow 1976 it was incredible

[@ibrahimsadika1581]

@@ashar1380 j0m Fire and. Lf

[@JT-cf7dq]

Nice job on the TU-144 landing gear. Crazier than a C-5.

[@tiax0340]

ill this day, I still miss Concorde

[@sharepremium8614]

Me too bro 😭😭

[@loicdubois2929]

Same😢😢:(

[@Nicosshalagalanis]

When the past are what you want in the future:Modifated Concorde !

[@themuscle79BONIFACIO]

Those Emirates A380 on landing it wasn't RR engines , it was alliance engines!!!!!!.

[@isras3780]

That was a real pilot.

[@melkuspinot3678]

Safran ( French SNECMA) and P&W

[@macgyverhighlander296]

Very Nice 👏👏👏

[@TheRealNatNat]

I dream of a Dassault Falcon. Unless my finances improve drastically, it will stay a dream I guess.. :)

[@affanairodgi3411]

😅😅😅😅

[@TheAprizzle92]

I don't see why it should stay a dream, go for it.

[@Gadgetonomy]

There is actual footage of the Tupolev TU-144 you know! Why use a computer game to show the plane??

[@tobymartin6394]

Because in all footage it crashed into the camera 😂😂

[@Gadgetonomy]

@@tobymartin6394 True.

[@awsshahwan645]

@ the end.. Not concorde.. It is tu144

[@goldenstreet8664]

I like the it

[@raultorres3473]

Concorde too advance for his era, even though it was a manual plane it had 4 of the best tubine engines built by no other then R. Royce's. Its till now the best super sonic comercial plane ever built. That says it all.

[@leonpona]

Fastert ? how about TU-144 Concordski was copy of Tupolev 144 , ya , ha ?

[@pb6198]

@daAnder71 no other has since though has it 🤦🤦🤦

[@pb6198]

@@leonpona yeah and it was a death trap. They ran it on 1 route, and people had to pass written notes when sat next to eachother as it was so loud. Even the Russian media ridiculed it😂😂

[@PenzancePete]

@@pb6198 That's because it had to run with it's engines in afterburner to achieve it's speed. It was a total unmitigated disaster of an aeroplane.

[@josesantossanchezgonzales7731]

Why they make lear jets so slow though. They seem so much faster.

[@theknowledge8319]

Tupolev TU -144 ❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@noroar3258]

lived near the flight path of pearson airport in toronto and the concordes were friggin noisey as hell !

[@jeanmariebrion694]

Premier le Concordski !!

[@felix25ize]

lol

[@flyorflying1087]

my favorite plane is the Airbus a380 and the Boeing 737

[@johnnyjjpny7746]

The Tupolev also known at the time as concordski was an aviation failure , Was a copy of the original concorde , crashed twice and decommissioned.

[@flyorflying1087]

5: Deusaut falcon 4: Airbus a380 its incredible 3: Cessna citation 2: Concorde its super fest plane 1: tupolev tu-144

[@markangelopuraso4315]

so cool

[@andrewdoubtfire4700]

Tragic to put the failure that was the TU144 ahead of Concorde. Going fast in a straight line then crashing is not a measure of success.

[@davidmaglov]

I guess you don't know much about Tu-144... Title of this video is making it pretty much, its not about which aeroplane flew longer or which aeroplane you prefer, or me but which one is faster. And Tu-144 flew 300km/h faster... 300

[@andrewdoubtfire4700]

Obviously know a lot more than you. Every plane on the list except the TU144, (which was only built using stolen early development drawings of Concorde), is / was used successfully for international commercial passenger operation over many years. Basically they were proven planes. TU144 was not. It was only used for internal USSR routes for a brief period, (matter of weeks) and then dropped after multiple technical issues. It would never have got international accreditation to fly into the outside world. It also crashed twice. Once through structural failure and once through a fuel leak. It is not comparable to the others in any way. Yes it did briefly fly faster, though never independently verified. Remember there was a lot of USSR propaganda put out about the TU144. By your measure if I put some wings on a sofa and dropped it from the high atmosphere it would out qualify others on the list as it went faster.

[@RB747domme]

D Maglov just so you know, during testing the prototype concordes were flying at 1530 miles per hour. Just saying

[@GrrMeister]

@@davidmaglov *Would you travel on it? - mosty Goods, early Amazon promise 'Next Day Delivery' - you would have been treated like a 'parcel' and trussed up to prevent breakage !*

[@julian8333]

Your birth was a failure

[@ckaviator757]

The Dassault Falcon and Cessna Citation aren't commercial aircraft.

[@danieloshea3326]

Your mom is a commercial aircraft

[@ansarmahmood8603]

Concorde the Symbol of Beauty in the Sky.Still Unbeatable in speed

[@michaelbruce5415]

Woudl the TU144 have taken of with nose DESCENDED! Shame the footage is CGI and not actual video.

[@davidbloxham9920]

Wicked!!!

[@hernandesmedquita1868]

Essa tecnologia super sonica ,porque não é usada mais?

[@八尾隆之]

Concord、and　B747 is mybest plane🥰　in　my life🥰

[@chrislynn8746]

Why no genuine film of the TU-144 instead of computer generated images? It's easy to find online for goodness sake!

[@eugeniodimilano]

facebook.com/100009389871780/videos/1532343330421981/

[@tanujthecoolsometimesafool5184]

I thought they only made propeller ones

[@tanujthecoolsometimesafool5184]

😮😮😱😱😱😲😲😲😰😰😟😶😵😳😧😨😎

[@dhanrajmohan701]

Public comments. Concord is so wonderful to watch take off and landing amazing .I still love the concord plane .

[@leonpona]

but Russians is bigger and faster !

[@garymay799]

Dhanraj Mohan could watch concord all day

[@felix25ize]

@@leonpona Only during some minutes, and slower after.

[@sucaryoayo1892]

Para Pilot penguji pswt trbang mpnyai kmpuan luar biasa dr sgi tekhnik take off dm landing. Aplgi dlm dlm mnrbangkn concorde and tupolev. 144. Smoga sukses slalu. Amiin.

[@shinra5760]

Thing is though Concorde is still better cause Concorde only used its after burners whiles taking off and when getting to Mach 2 after that they shut them down. But the Tupolev used them at max on take off and all the way through the flight till landing

[@bacaagalanaa5438]

Awesome

[@tahititoutou3802]

You forgot the Convair 990 which was the fastest subsonic commercial plane ever. (Its maximum speed was actually transonic.)

[@AA-ss9no]

Also forgot the VC10

[@PabloGonzalez-hv3td]

Transonic speeds begin well below Mach 1 at around Mach 0.72 practically all modern subsonic jets fly at transonic speeds

[@tahititoutou3802]

@@PabloGonzalez-hv3td Not quite. "Transonic" refers to speeds where shock waves form and sticks to the aircraft (or whatever) structure, causing a turbulent airflow and very large drag. This means speeds approximately between 0.95 and 1.05 Mach. So why do we speak of transonic speeds at Mach 0.89 for planes like the Boeing 787, 0.82 for planes like the Convair 880 and 990 and 0.75 for planes like the Spitfire in divings? Because of the form of the wings. The extrados (the upper surface) is curved, forcing the air to go around the wing faster that the plane is flying. Same with the rounded nose. So, at these places, the air moves faster relative to the airplane than at other more flat surfaces (this is why shock waves appear there first). How much faster? It depends on the form of the wing (and the nose). For a "classic" wing like that of a Spitfire it is approximately Mach 0.75. For a critical wing like that of the Convairs, around Mach 0.82 and for a supercritical wing like those of a 787, A-350 and the like, 0.89~0.92. So, at Mach 0.84, a Spitfire is supersonic, a Convair is transonic and a 787 is subsonic.

[@PabloGonzalez-hv3td]

@@tahititoutou3802 - That explanation conflates localized supersonic airflow around an airfoil with the formation of shock waves and while it's true that a conventional airfoil does not like exceeding its critical Mach number by much if any, and that a supercritical airfoil raises the Mcrit, the supercritical airfoil can also tolerate a much larger area of localized supersonic airflow while at the same time further delaying the onset of wave drag so your insinuation that a supercritical airfoil always sees subsonic airflow is incorrect hence the name _super_ critical the critical referring to the critical Mach number at which localized supersonic airflow and the transonic regime begins. Since most modern jets possess some form of supercritical airfoil = most modern jets fly at transonic speeds

[@leonpona]

what you talking about ? Fastert ? how about TU-144 or 160 ? or concord ? ha ?

[@juliamcintyre5012]

Fantastic - thank you so much.

[@johnlow1201]

Julia McIntyre concorde...he.is.pretty.and.fast.airplane

[@CrankCase08]

Airbus is not from France; it's actually a European multinational aerospace corporation.

[@ColetteMain1]

Ehh

[@isras3780]

Almost 20 20 and we are still crawling? ??

[@isentropic_mach_relation]

Isra S it’s because the economics of fast planes is bad for airlines which is why concorde failed

[@dvamateur]

Our culture is collapsing. People want free stuff. The media does not even cover 2024 plan to go back to the Moon.

[@mrgoggles1963]

Statement is inaccurate. The Concorde did not “fail.” I suggest you read up on fact based historical events of the lineage of the Concorde. It will do you some good, son.

[@yves3560]

@@mrgoggles1963 Errr, he obviously means we´re crawling again, son.

[@mrgoggles1963]

Yves no...not at all what is being said. (and you don’t know how to condescend with any effect, obviously) 💃🏾Pushawwww🤦🏾‍♀️

[@MDRCOM-fd6lb]

Is so good!

[@莫狂躁]

Yes good good good

[@stevek3036]

Why no real video of the No.1 fastest 'commercial plane'? Ive never heard of the CCCP plane? did it go into actual service or was it a prototype? its one thing to make a record breaking test flight but another to make a plane a COMMERCIAL plane as the video title states...…..

[@staernpeder]

It was used as a passenger plane for a short period in 77-78 but mostly as a cargo plane. Just google TU-144!

[@Monttukani]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/jHe6k6iBp5pgf5o

[@venomgaming7872]

Airbus A380: MOVE PEEPS! Boeing: Ah shi* here we go again

[@richiesquest3283]

I always feel safer when flying when seeing the Rolls Royce emblem on the engines.

[@isentropic_mach_relation]

richies quest the rolls Royce Trent 1000 engine was very unreliable an some of the 787s and General Electric is usually just as safe or safer

[@amck72]

That vertical landing for the Airbus was pretty bad. The pilot was all over the place.

[@g.l.7151]

For one the way you see it camera using a zoom is different than reality. NOT a vertical landing! Then I'm sure you would have done much better :)

[@coriscotupi]

People can't tell the difference between GENERAL AVIATION business jets and commercial aircraft, yet post videos about the subject. Gotta love KZbin.

[@mastain8227]

Keeerrrreeeennnn

[@dapto234]

@the 7:00 mark the Cessna shown has winglets then the next shot on the ground doesn't have winglets..are they both the same aircraft.

[@ARVINDYADAV-uv7se]

But showing a game play video in the last plane

[@bagula3046]

wuw hes driftting like a maniac mate 2:56

[@noname-yi7em]

2:56 craziest landing

[@panzerkampfwagenivausfuhru7411]

nope

[@panzerkampfwagenivausfuhru7411]

etihad Crosswind landing is much dramatic

[@caesar7734]

How can the A380 fly so fast if it is so heavy?

[@PenzancePete]

Aerodynamics and powerful engines.

[@cocoetoliviermereau1717]

Copieurs ! Boum ! Au bourget ! 🤗

[@mikemortensen4973]

Those mentioning the VC10 having a record for cross Atlantic crossing are correct. I forgot about that one. However, the day they made that record crossing they flew it much faster than normal. It still made it so it counts.

[@richardmorris7063]

Tail winds effect its speed too. Last yr a couple jets caught a big tail wind & actually broke some records.

[@michaelmcgovern1561]

The TU-144 was actually faster than Concorde so is No.1 with Concorde at No.2. The Cessna 750 is the fastest civilian aircraft following the retirement of Concorde so should be at No.3. The Gulfstream 650 is very slightly slower at No.4 The Boeing 747 is faster than the A380 so is at No.5 with the A380 at No.6. The Falcon 900Ex, like all Falcon bizjets is designed in France, and the A380 can fly for longer than 12 hours nonstop.

[@PlanesAndGames732]

What about the CV-990A?

[@matthiashornbostel8240]

That's all right. Especially the 747-400 is faster than the A380.